Hospital-presenting self-harm and ideation: Comparison of incidence, profile and risk of repetition

Self-injurious thoughts and behaviours as the reason for contact to Norwegian emergency primary care centres: an observational study

OBJECTIVE

To describe and compare contacts regarding self-injurious thoughts and behaviours to other contacts to emergency primary care.

DESIGN

Observational study.

SETTING

A sentinel network of seven emergency primary care centres throughout Norway.

SUBJECTS

Initial contacts regarding patients 10 years and older during 12 consecutive months (11/2021-10/2022).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Contacts due to self-injurious thoughts and behaviours.

RESULTS

Self-injurious thoughts and behaviours were the reason for contact for 0.6% (n = 478) of initial contacts for patients aged 10 years or older (n = 77 344). When compared to other contacts, self-injurious thoughts and behaviours were associated with female gender, younger age, occurrence during evening and nighttime, higher urgency, and more physician consultations and call-outs. Of contacts about self-injurious thoughts and behaviours, 58.2% were regarding thoughts and 41.8% about behaviours, and in 75.0% a history of similar contacts was recorded. Contacts regarding thoughts often concerned threats (30.6%) and were more often handled by telephone advice than contacts regarding behaviours. Contacts regarding behaviours with suicidal intent were associated with higher urgency and more physician call-outs than contacts regarding non-suicidal behaviours.

CONCLUSION

Self-injurious thoughts and behaviours are rare reasons for contact to emergency primary care but are assessed as more urgent than other contact reasons and trigger more extensive medical help. Many of the patients are known to the service through a history of similar contacts.

IMPLICATIONS

The infrequency and severity of these encounters might necessitate training, decision support and procedures to compensate for the health care personnel's limited exposure.

Substance use during hospitalisation requiring an urgent clinical response: an opportunity for intervention

BACKGROUND

There are few reports on drug use in patients while hospitalised and none regarding management or clinical outcomes.

AIMS

To describe cases of drug use by inpatients requiring an urgent clinical response.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed cases at a teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia, from February 2019 to March 2021.

RESULTS

Thirty cases were identified, with no deaths. Two patient groups were identified: (i) substance use disorders, using illicit drugs and (ii) self-harm history, using prescribed or over-the-counter drugs. Management involved cardiac monitoring (40%), intensive care (30%), charcoal (20%), antidotes (20%) and intubation (13%). Discharge was planned in 22 of 30 patients, against medical advice in four and directed by medical staff in four.

CONCLUSIONS

Inpatient drug use requiring an urgent clinical response was infrequently recognised but presents a risk of harm to patients and staff and increases service utilisation and costs. Both harm reduction and systematic approaches guided by institutional policy are recommended. Using these events as reachable moments to address driving factors may modify patients' risk from future events.

Near Hanging: Evaluation and Management

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the incidence of self-harm was already on the rise. Hanging/suffocation accounted for 50% of the increase in suicide attempts and remains the second leading cause of death from self-harm in the United States. Studies on the management of near-hanging patients are lacking, and most published literature is retrospective. Following airway and circulation assessment, clinical examination and imaging, namely CT angiography, remain the standard for identifying the injuries associated with near hanging: cervical spine fracture, blunt cerebrovascular injury, laryngeal injury, and injury to the trachea and oropharynx. These injuries, however, are uncommon, and each occur in < 5% of patients in most series. In a large series of critically ill near-hanging patients, > 50% survived to hospital discharge; however, cardiac arrest predicted a poor outcome. The management of asphyxia-related arrest remains controversial. Targeted temperature management has only been studied in a single large multicenter trial, which was retrospective. Given the significant selection bias of targeted temperature management in the treatment of the most ill patients, no firm recommendations can be made. Finally, for survivors, the underlying mental health issues must be addressed to avoid recurrent suicide attempts. Thirty percent of patients in a large near-hanging series were admitted for their second suicide attempt.

Hospital presenting suicidal ideation: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Research indicates that the emergency department is the primary setting for people to present with suicidal ideation. Attempting to provide interventions for this population depends greatly on understanding their needs and life circumstances at the time of presentation to services, therefore enabling more appropriate treatment pathways and services to be provided.

AIM

This review aims to collate, evaluate and synthesize the empirical research focused on the population of people presenting to hospital settings with suicidal ideation.

METHOD

A systematic literature search was performed. Articles that met a specified set of inclusion criteria including participants being over 18, not being admitted to hospital and presenting to an emergency department setting underwent a quality assessment and data analysis. The quality assessment used was the EPHPP Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies (Thomas et al., 2004).

RESULTS

Twenty-seven articles were included in the review. Studies were quantitative and of reasonable methodological quality (Thomas et al., 2004). The literature was characterized by demographic information, mental health factors associated with the presentation to hospital and treatment pathways or outcomes reported. The reviewed research showed that people presenting to emergency departments with suicidal ideation were varying in age, gender, ethnic background and socio-economic status (SES). Large proportions of studies reported psychosocial factors alongside interpersonal struggles as the main presenting reason. The review highlights large variability across these factors. Mental health diagnosis was common, previous suicide attempt was a risk factor, and treatment pathways were unclear. The review identifies the outstanding gaps and weaknesses in this literature as well as areas in need of future research.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the review highlights the prevalence of people reporting interpersonal factors as the reason for suicidal ideation and not mental health disorders or diagnosis. Despite this, no mention of trauma or life stories was made in any study assessing this population. Despite a large variation across studies making synthesis difficult, data proves clinically relevant and informative for future practice and guidance on areas needing further research.

Negative stance towards treatment in psychosocial assessments: The role of personalised recommendations in promoting acceptance

People presenting to the emergency department with self-harm or thoughts of suicide undergo a psychosocial assessment involving recommendations for e.g. contact with other practitioners, charity helplines or coping strategies. In these assessments, patients frequently adopt a negative stance towards potential recommendations. Analysing 35 video-recorded liaison psychiatry psychosocial assessments from an emergency department in England (2018-2019), we ask how these practitioners transform this negative stance into acceptance. We show that practitioners use three steps to anticipate and address negative stance (1) asking questions about the patient's experience/understanding that help the patient to articulate a negative stance (e.g., "what do you think about that"); (2) accepting or validating the reasons underlying the negative stance (e.g., "that's a very real fear and thought to have"); and (3) showing the patient that their reasons were incorporated in the recommendation (e.g., "it's telephone support if you're a bit more uncomfortable with face to face"). These steps personalise the recommendation based on the patient's specific experiences and understanding. When practitioners followed all three of these steps, the patient moved from a negative stance to acceptance in 84% of cases. When practitioners made a recommendation but did not follow all three steps, the patient moved from a negative stance to acceptance in only 14% of cases. It is not the case that each communication practice works on its own to promote patient acceptance, rather Steps 1 and 2 build on each other sequentially to develop and demonstrate shared understanding of the patient's negative stance. In this way, acceptance and validation play an indispensable role in addressing a patient's concerns about treatment.

The acute antisuicidal effects of single-dose intravenous ketamine and intranasal esketamine in individuals with major depression and bipolar disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The efficacy of ketamine in reducing suicidal ideation (SI) has been previously reported. We aimed to evaluate acute anti-SI effects of single-dose ketamine in different formulations/routes of administration by pooling results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A systematic search was conducted on Cochrane, Embase, Medline, and PubMed from inception to July 1st, 2020. Studies were selected based on pre-determined eligibility criteria. Effect sizes of different formulations/routes at various time points were computed using random-effects models. With data from nine eligible RCTs (n = 197), the pooled effect size for anti-SI effects at the 24-h time point was 1.035 (N = 6, CI: 0.793 to 1.277, p < 0.001) for intravenous (IV) racemic ketamine and 1.309 (N = 1, CI: 0.857 to 1.761, p < 0.001) for intranasal (IN) esketamine. An additional five RCTs were available for qualitative analysis. RCTs were identified for oral/sublingual ketamine for depression, however, none of these trials reported anti-SI effects preventing quantitative analysis for these routes of delivery. No RCTs for intramuscular (IM) ketamine were identified. The findings suggest that single-dose IV ketamine/IN esketamine is associated with robust reductions in suicidal thoughts at 2-h, 4-h, and 24-h post-intervention. In addition, future studies on IM/oral/sublingual ketamine and comparative studies are warranted to evaluate the anti-SI efficacy of distinct formulations and routes of administration.

Suicidal Presentations to Emergency Departments in a Large Australian Public Health Service over 10 Years

This paper presents trends and characteristics for 32,094 suicidal presentations to two Emergency Departments (EDs) in a large health service in Australia across a 10-year period (2009–2018). Prevalence of annual suicidal presentations and for selected groups of consumers (by sex, age groups, and ethnicity) was determined from a machine learning diagnostic algorithm developed for this purpose and a Bayesian estimation approach. A linear increase in the number of suicidal presentations over 10 years was observed, which was 2.8-times higher than the increase noted in all ED presentations and 6.1-times higher than the increase in the population size. Females had higher presentation rates than males, particularly among younger age groups. The highest rates of presentations were by persons aged 15–24. Overseas-born persons had around half the rates of suicidal presentations than Australian-born persons, and Indigenous persons had 2.9-times higher rates than non-Indigenous persons. Of all presenters, 70.6% presented once, but 5.7% had five or more presentations. Seasonal distribution of presentations showed a peak at the end of spring and a decline in winter months. These findings can inform the allocation of health resources and guide the development of suicide prevention strategies for people presenting to hospitals in suicidal crisis.

Risk of repetition and subsequent self-harm following presentation to hospital with suicidal ideation: A longitudinal registry study

BACKGROUND

Few studies have focused on those who present to hospital with suicidal thoughts (suicidal ideation). The aim of this study was to establish the risk of repeat presentation to hospital following suicidal ideation and to identify factors which were associated with further ideation or subsequent self-harm.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the Northern Ireland Registry of Self-harm. Risk of repeat presentation following hospital-presenting ideation was analysed using Kaplan Meier analyses, specifically cox proportional hazard models.

FINDINGS

During the period April 2014 to March 2019, a total of 14,695 presentations to hospital due to suicidal ideation were made in Northern Ireland. The cumulative incidence of repeat presentation to hospital was 40·5% within five years, with an 18·3% risk of subsequent self-harm. Previous ideation had the strongest association with repeat presentation. There was evidence of recidivism considering further ideation, with an increased risk according to number of previous presentations. In contrast, risk of subsequent self-harm was highest after the first or second presentation. Male gender and alcohol were associated with further ideation, while females and young people were more likely to re-present with self-harm.

INTERPRETATION

The findings indicate that individuals who present to hospital with suicidal ideation are at risk of repeat presentation and future self-harm, however clinical guidelines do not specifically address hospital-presenting ideation. The transition from ideation to suicidal behaviour is important to consider and research could inform effective screening and early intervention measures.

ROLE OF FUNDING

The Northern Ireland Registry of Self-harm is funded by the Public Health Agency, Northern Ireland.