2012 Beers Criteria Update: How Should Practicing Nurses Use the Criteria?

How to Use the American Geriatrics Society 2015 Beers Criteria-A Guide for Patients, Clinicians, Health Systems, and Payors

The Beers Criteria are a valuable tool for clinical care and quality improvement but may be misinterpreted and implemented in ways that cause unintended harms. This article describes the intended role of the 2015 American Geriatrics Society (AGS) Beers Criteria and provides guidance on how patients, clinicians, health systems, and payors should use them. A key theme underlying these recommendations is to use common sense and clinical judgment in applying the 2015 AGS Beers Criteria and to remain mindful of nuances in the criteria. The criteria serve as a "warning light" to identify medications that have an unfavorable balance of benefits and harms in many older adults, particularly when compared with pharmacological and nonpharmacological alternatives. However, there are situations in which use of medications included in the criteria can be appropriate. As such, the 2015 AGS Beers Criteria work best not only when they identify potentially inappropriate medications, but also when they educate clinicians and patients about the reasons those medications are included and the situations in which their use may be more or less problematic. The criteria are designed to support, rather than supplant, good clinical judgment.

Adherence to therapy and adverse drug reactions: is there a link?

INTRODUCTION

Advances in biomedical technology and access to effective medications have resulted in significant improvements in patient survival and quality of life. Patient adherence is crucial to quality healthcare outcomes; however, achievement of consistent adherence remains difficult. Patient non-adherence represents an important health problem, from a clinical/economic viewpoint, being associated with reduced treatment benefits and significant financial burden. Non-adherence potentially leads to adverse drug events (ADEs), which are generally responsible for poorer health outcomes and avoidable resource misuse. Further, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) exemplify one of the most significant barriers to patients' medication-taking behavior with further detrimental clinical/economic outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

The authors review adherence definitions and its measurement, emphasizing the consequences of the New European Pharmacovigilance Legislation on ADR definition. They analyzed the causes and the clinical/economic consequences of non-adherence and ADEs/ADRs in order to highlight a possible causal link.

EXPERT OPINION

Careful assessment of this harmful relationship is crucial in planning for the interventions needed to improve effectiveness of pharmacological care and to safeguard the sustainability of healthcare systems. Finally, through the 'deactivation' of this link, there will be more chance that advances in healthcare technologies will realize their potential to reduce the burden of chronic illness.

Optimizing polypharmacy among elderly hospital patients with chronic diseases--study protocol of the cluster randomized controlled POLITE-RCT trial

Background

Treatment of patients with multimorbidity is challenging. A rational reduction of long-term drugs can lead to decreased mortality, less acute hospital treatment, and a reduction of costs. Simplification of drug treatment schemes is also related to higher levels of patient satisfaction and adherence. The POLITE-RCT trial will test the effectiveness of an intervention aiming at reducing the number of prescribed long-term drugs among multimorbid and chronically ill patients. The intervention focuses on the interface between primary and secondary health care and includes a pharmacist-based, patient-centered medication review prior to the patient’s discharge from hospital.

Methods

The POLITE-RCT trial is a cluster randomized controlled trial. Two major secondary health care providers of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Germany, take part in the study. Clusters are wards of both medical centers. All wards where patients with chronic diseases and multimorbidity are regularly treated will be included. Patients aged 65+ years who take five or more prescribed long-term drugs and who are likely to spend at least 5 days in the participating hospitals will be recruited and included consecutively. Cluster-randomization takes place after a six-month baseline data collection period. Patients of the control group receive care as usual. The independent two main primary outcomes are (1) health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) and (2) the difference in the number of prescribed long-term pharmaceutical agents between intervention and control group. The secondary outcomes are appropriateness of prescribed medication (PRISCUS list, Beers Criteria, MAI), patient satisfaction (TSQM), patient empowerment (PEF-FB-9), patient autonomy (IADL), falls, re-hospitalization, and death. The points of measurement are at admission to (T0) and discharge from hospital (T1) as well as 6 and 12 months after discharge from the hospital (T2 and T3). In 42 wards, 1,626 patients will be recruited.

Discussion

In case of positive evaluation, the proposed study will provide evidence for a sustainable reduction of polypharmacy by enhancing patient-centeredness and patient autonomy.

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN42003273