1
|
Xu Y, Han PP, Su XQ, Xue P, Guo YJ. Exploration of decision aids to support advance care planning: A scoping review. J Clin Nurs 2024; 33:3477-3497. [PMID: 38661107 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.17187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Revised: 04/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advance care planning is a process through which people communicate their goals and preferences for future medical care. Due to the complexity of the decision-making process, decision aids can assist individuals in balancing potential benefits and risks of treatment options. OBJECTIVE While decision aids have the potential to better promote advance care planning, their characteristics, content and application effectiveness are unclear and lack systematic review. Therefore, we aimed to explore these three aspects and establish a foundation for future research. DESIGN Scoping review. METHODS This scoping review adheres to the framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley and the PRISMA-ScR list. Six English-language databases were systematically searched from the time of construction until 1 December 2023. Two researchers conducted the article screening and data extraction, and the extracted data was presented in written tables and narrative summaries. RESULTS Of the 1479 titles and abstracts, 20 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Types of decision aids were employed, mainly websites and videos. Decision aid's primary components center around 11 areas, such as furnishing information, exploring treatment and care preferences. The main manifestations were a significant increase in knowledge and improved recognition of patients' target value preferences. Among the aids, websites and videos for advance care planning have relatively high content acceptability and decision-making process satisfaction, but their feasibility has yet to be tested. CONCLUSIONS Decision aids were varied, with content focused on describing key information and exploring treatment and care preferences. Regarding application effects, the aids successfully facilitated the advance care planning process and improved the quality of participants' decisions. Overall, decision aids are efficient in improving the decision-making process for implementing advance care planning in cancer and geriatric populations. In the future, personalised decision aids should be developed based on continuous optimization of tools' quality and promoted for clinical application. REPORTING METHOD The paper has adhered to the EQUATOR guidelines and referenced the PRISMAg-ScR checklist. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION This is a review without patient and public contribution. REGISTRATION https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/YPHKF, Open Science DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/YPHKF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Xu
- School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
| | - Ping-Ping Han
- School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xiao-Qin Su
- School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
| | - Ping Xue
- Office of Joint Medicine, Taizhou Second People's Hospital, Taizhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yu-Jie Guo
- School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Grande SW, Kotzbauer G, Hunt S, Tan KYH, Yagnik S, Ellenbogen M, Pederson J, Hager A, Hoppe H, Sutton L, Villarejo-Galende A, Epperly M. An Environmental Scan of Tools That Help Individuals Living With Mild Cognitive Impairment or Neurocognitive Disorders Achieve Their Preferred Health or Well-Being. THE GERONTOLOGIST 2024; 64:gnae071. [PMID: 38864593 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnae071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Older adults experiencing neurocognitive disease (NCD) contend with complex care often characterized by high emotional strain. Mitigating complex care with decision support tools can clarify options. When used in conjunction with the practice of shared decision making (SDM), these tools can improve satisfaction and confidence in treatment. The use of these tools for cognitive health has increased, but more is needed to understand how these tools incorporate social needs into treatment plans. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We conducted an environmental scan using a MEDLINE-informed search strategy and feedback from an expert steering committee to characterize current tools and approaches for engaging older adults experiencing NCD. We assessed their application and development, incorporation of social determinants, goals or preferences, and inclusion of caregivers in their design. RESULTS We identified 11 articles, 7 of which show that SDM helps guide tool development and that most center on clinical decision making. Types of tools varied by clinical site and those differences reflected patient need. A collective value across tools was their use to forge meaningful conversations. Most tools appeared designed without the explicit goal to elicit patient social needs or incorporate nonclinical strategies into treatment plans. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS Several challenges and opportunities exist that center on strategies to engage patients in the design and testing of tools that support conversations with clinicians about cognitive health. Future work should focus on building and testing adaptable tools that support patient and family social care needs beyond clinical care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart W Grande
- School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Shanda Hunt
- University of Minnesota Libraries, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Karynn Yee-Huey Tan
- Hematology, APAC Disease Area Network, Roche Pharmaceuticals, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Supriya Yagnik
- Clinical Product Development, Genentech, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael Ellenbogen
- International Dementia Advocate and Connecter, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | - Heidi Hoppe
- Orr Memory Clinic, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, USA
| | - Lisa Sutton
- Program for All-Inclusive Care for Elderly, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA
| | - Alberto Villarejo-Galende
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mikele Epperly
- Product Development Medical Affairs, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Riley SR, Voisin C, Stevens EE, Bose-Brill S, Moss KO. Tools for tomorrow: a scoping review of patient-facing tools for advance care planning. Palliat Care Soc Pract 2024; 18:26323524241263108. [PMID: 39045292 PMCID: PMC11265253 DOI: 10.1177/26323524241263108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Advance care planning (ACP) supports individuals in aligning their medical care with personal values and preferences in the face of serious illness. The variety of ACP tools available reflects diverse strategies intended to facilitate these critical conversations, yet evaluations of their effectiveness often show mixed results. Following the Arskey and O'Malley framework, this scoping review aims to synthesize the range of ACP tools targeted at patients and families, highlighting their characteristics and delivery methods to better understand their impact and development over time. Studies included focused on patient-facing ACP tools across all settings and mediums. Exclusions were applied to studies solely targeting healthcare providers or those only aiming at completion of advance directives without broader ACP discussions. Searches were conducted across PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Data were extracted using a predesigned spreadsheet, capturing study population, setting, intervention modality, and intervention theme. Tools were categorized by delivery method and further analyzed through a year-wise distribution to track trends and developments. We identified 99 unique patient-facing tools, with those focusing on counseling (31) and video technologies (21) being the most prevalent while others incorporated online platforms, print materials, games, or some combination of different delivery methods. Over half the tools were designed for specific patient groups, especially for various diseases and racial or ethnic communities. Recent years showed a surge in tool variety and innovation, including integrated patient portals and psychological techniques. The review demonstrates a broad array of innovative ACP tools that facilitate personalized and effective ACP. Our findings contribute to an enhanced understanding of their utilization and potential impacts, offering valuable insights for future tool development and policy making in ACP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean R. Riley
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, 2050 Kenny Road, Columbus, OH 43215, USA
- Center for Health Outcomes in Medicine Scholarship and Service, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
- Division of Health Services Management and Policy, The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Christiane Voisin
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
- Center for Health Outcomes in Medicine Scholarship and Service, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Erin E. Stevens
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
- The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Seuli Bose-Brill
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
- Center for Health Outcomes in Medicine Scholarship and Service, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Karen O. Moss
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
- Center for Health Outcomes in Medicine Scholarship and Service, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
- Center for Healthy Aging, Self-Management, and Complex Care, The Ohio State University College of Nursing, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hayes Bauer E, Schultz ANØ, Brandt F, Smith AC, Bollig G, Dieperink KB. Patient and families' perspectives on telepalliative care: A systematic integrative review. Palliat Med 2024; 38:42-56. [PMID: 38112009 PMCID: PMC10865769 DOI: 10.1177/02692163231217146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Telepalliative care is increasingly used in palliative care, but has yet to be examined from a patient and family perspective. A synthesis of evidence may provide knowledge on how to plan and provide telepalliative care that caters specifically to patients and families' needs. OBJECTIVE To synthesise evidence on patients and families' perspectives on telepalliative care. DESIGN A systematic integrative review (PROSPERO #CRD42022301206) reported in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Inclusion criteria; primary peer-reviewed studies published 2011-2022, patient and family perspective, >18 years, telepalliative care and English/Danish language. Quality was appraised using the mixed-methods appraisal tool, version 2020. Guided by Toronto and Remington, data were extracted, thematically analysed and synthesised. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL were searched in March 2022 and updated in February 2023. RESULTS Forty-four studies were included. Analysis revealed five themes; the effect of the Covid-19 pandemic on telepalliative care, adding value for patients and families, synchronous and asynchronous telepalliative care, the integration of telepalliative care with other services and the tailoring and timing of telepalliative care. CONCLUSION Enhanced access to care and convenience, as attributes of telepalliative care, are highly valued. Patients and families have varying needs during the illness trajectory that may be addressed by early integration of telepalliative care based on models of care that are flexible and combine synchronous and asynchronous solutions. Further research should examine telepalliative care in a post-pandemic context, use of models of care and identify meaningful outcome measures from patient and family perspectives for evaluation of telepalliative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eithne Hayes Bauer
- Institute of Regional Health Research, Hospital Soenderjylland, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Research Unit, Hospital Soenderjylland, University Hospital of Southern Jutland, Aabenraa, Denmark
- Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Research, Family Focused Healthcare Research Centre (FaCe), University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Anders Nikolai Ørsted Schultz
- Institute of Regional Health Research, Hospital Soenderjylland, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Research Unit, Hospital Soenderjylland, University Hospital of Southern Jutland, Aabenraa, Denmark
- Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Frans Brandt
- Institute of Regional Health Research, Hospital Soenderjylland, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Research Unit, Hospital Soenderjylland, University Hospital of Southern Jutland, Aabenraa, Denmark
| | - Anthony C Smith
- Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Australia
| | - Georg Bollig
- HELIOS Klinikum Schleswig, Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Palliative Medicine and Pain Therapy, Schleswig, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Karin Brochstedt Dieperink
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Research, Family Focused Healthcare Research Centre (FaCe), University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|