1
|
Tulloch AIT, Borthwick F, Bogueva D, Eltholth M, Grech A, Edgar D, Boylan S, McNeill G. How the EAT-Lancet Commission on food in the Anthropocene influenced discourse and research on food systems: a systematic review covering the first 2 years post-publication. Lancet Glob Health 2023; 11:e1125-e1136. [PMID: 37349038 DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(23)00212-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
In 2019, the EAT-Lancet Commission's report on food in the Anthropocene presented a planetary heath diet to improve health while reducing the environmental effect of food systems globally. We assessed EAT-Lancet's immediate influence on academic research and debate by conducting a systematic review of articles citing the Commission and others published from January, 2019, to April, 2021. The Commission influenced methods, results, or discourse for 192 (7·5%) of 2560 citing articles, stimulating cross-disciplinary research and debate across life sciences (47%), health and medical sciences (42%), and social sciences (11%). Sentiment analysis of 76 critiquing articles indicated that opinions were, on average, more positive than negative. Positive sentiments centred on benefits for informing policy, public health, and raising public awareness. Negative sentiments included insufficient attention to socioeconomic dimensions, feasibility, and environmental effects other than emissions. Empirical articles predominantly evaluated the effects of changed diets or food production on the environment and wellbeing (29%), compared current diets with EAT-Lancet recommendations (12%), or informed future policy and research agendas (20%). Despite limitations in EAT-Lancet's method, scope, and implementation feasibility, the academic community supported these recommendations. A broad suite of research needs was identified focusing on the effects of food processing, socioeconomic and political drivers of diet and health, and optimising consumption or production for environment and health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayesha I T Tulloch
- School of Biology and Environmental Science and Centre for Agriculture and the Bioeconomy, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
| | - Fiona Borthwick
- Global Academy of Agriculture and Food Systems, The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Diana Bogueva
- Centre for Advanced Food Engineering, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Curtin University Sustainability Policy Institute, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
| | - Mahmoud Eltholth
- Global Academy of Agriculture and Food Systems, The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; Hygiene and Preventive Medicine Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El- Sheikh, Egypt; Department of Health Studies, Royal Holloway University of London, London, UK
| | - Amanda Grech
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Dylan Edgar
- Global Academy of Agriculture and Food Systems, The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Sinead Boylan
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Geraldine McNeill
- Global Academy of Agriculture and Food Systems, The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Degrowth in Practice: Developing an Ecological Habitus within Permaculture Entrepreneurship. SUSTAINABILITY 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/su14148938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
The literature on degrowth has suffered from only engaging with normative ideas. More recently the degrowth debate has started moving from a normative perspective to close the wide gap that has existed between normative ideas and is analysing how to link ideas to the institutional and cultural environment that shapes practices. To address this challenge, we draw on the work of Pierre Bourdieu in order to examine transformations in the habitus and forms of capital of those who decide to move into sustainable entrepreneurship through permaculture in Brazil. Permaculture represents a vibrant alternative to industrial food production and addresses fundamental contemporary social problems, such as increasing inequalities, climate change and the loss of biodiversity. The article explores the challenges faced and respective responses of those who decide to change their relationships with nature and society by becoming permaculture entrepreneurs (PEs). The paper shows that, when entering the permaculture universe, individuals start critically examining their values and ways of living, which leads to a disengagement from dominant patterns of behaviour and social expectations in order to pursue sustainable lifestyles and thereby develop an ecological habitus.
Collapse
|
3
|
Nasikh, Kamaludin M, Narmaditya BS, Wibowo A, Febrianto I. Agricultural land resource allocation to develop food crop commodities: lesson from Indonesia. Heliyon 2021; 7:e07520. [PMID: 34307945 PMCID: PMC8287237 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Revised: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
This study estimates agricultural land resource allocation to develop food-crop commodities in order to safeguard food security in Indonesia in the middle of the coronavirus pandemic. The recommended commodities to be developed in Indonesia are corn, soybean, mungbean, peanut, and rice that are produced with advanced technology and input-output coefficient. There are five introduced scenarios namely, basic scenario, I, II, III, and IV. There are problems related to resource allocation such as limited resources, the ways of using it, and time constraints. In order to maintain and improve the comparative advantage of agricultural production as well as to broaden the agricultural activities, agricultural development is directed to increase business efficiency, improvements in agricultural science, technology, and human resource quality. The utilization of agricultural land resources should be well-planned for better development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasikh
- Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
| | - Mahirah Kamaludin
- Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Development, University Malaysia Terengganu, Malaysia
| | | | - Agus Wibowo
- Faculty Economics, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sustainable Agri-Food Systems: Environment, Economy, Society, and Policy. SUSTAINABILITY 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/su13116260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Agri-food systems (AFS) have been central in the debate on sustainable development. Despite this growing interest in AFS, comprehensive analyses of the scholarly literature are hard to find. Therefore, the present systematic review delineated the contours of this growing research strand and analyzed how it relates to sustainability. A search performed on the Web of Science in January 2020 yielded 1389 documents, and 1289 were selected and underwent bibliometric and topical analyses. The topical analysis was informed by the SAFA (Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agriculture systems) approach of FAO and structured along four dimensions viz. environment, economy, society and culture, and policy and governance. The review shows an increasing interest in AFS with an exponential increase in publications number. However, the study field is north-biased and dominated by researchers and organizations from developed countries. Moreover, the analysis suggests that while environmental aspects are sufficiently addressed, social, economic, and political ones are generally overlooked. The paper ends by providing directions for future research and listing some topics to be integrated into a comprehensive, multidisciplinary agenda addressing the multifaceted (un)sustainability of AFS. It makes the case for adopting a holistic, 4-P (planet, people, profit, policy) approach in agri-food system studies.
Collapse
|
6
|
Röös E, Bajzelj B, Weil C, Andersson E, Bossio D, Gordon LJ. Moving beyond organic – A food system approach to assessing sustainable and resilient farming. GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
7
|
City Region Food Systems: Building Resilience to COVID-19 and Other Shocks. SUSTAINABILITY 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/su13031325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Using examples from the COVID-19 pandemic, this paper reviews the contribution a City Region Food Systems (CRFS) approach makes to regional sustainability and resilience for existing and future shocks including climate change. We include both explicit interventions under United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO-RUAF) led initiatives, as well as ad hoc efforts that engage with elements of the CRFS approach. To provide context, we begin with a literature review of the CRFS approach followed by an overview of the global food crisis, where we outline many of the challenges inherent to the industrial capital driven food system. Next, we elaborate three key entry points for the CRFS approach—multistakeholder engagement across urban rural spaces; the infrastructure needed to support more robust CRFS; system centered planning, and, the role of policy in enabling (or thwarting) food system sustainability. The pandemic raises questions and provides insights about how to foster more resilient food systems, and provides lessons for the future for the City Region Food System approach in the context of others shocks including climate change.
Collapse
|
8
|
Pereira LM, Drimie S, Maciejewski K, Tonissen PB, Biggs R(O. Food System Transformation: Integrating a Political-Economy and Social-Ecological Approach to Regime Shifts. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:E1313. [PMID: 32085576 PMCID: PMC7068403 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17041313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2020] [Revised: 02/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Sustainably achieving the goal of global food security is one of the greatest challenges of the 21st century. The current food system is failing to meet the needs of people, and at the same time, is having far-reaching impacts on the environment and undermining human well-being in other important ways. It is increasingly apparent that a deep transformation in the way we produce and consume food is needed in order to ensure a more just and sustainable future. This paper uses the concept of regime shifts to understand key drivers and innovations underlying past disruptions in the food system and to explore how they may help us think about desirable future changes and how we might leverage them. We combine two perspectives on regime shifts-one derived from natural sciences and the other from social sciences-to propose an interpretation of food regimes that draws on innovation theory. We use this conceptualization to discuss three examples of innovations that we argue helped enable critical regime shifts in the global food system in the past: the Haber-Bosch process of nitrogen fixation, the rise of the supermarket, and the call for more transparency in the food system to reconnect consumers with their food. This paper concludes with an exploration of why this combination of conceptual understandings is important across the Global North/ Global South divide, and proposes a new sustainability regime where transformative change is spearheaded by a variety of social-ecological innovations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura M. Pereira
- Centre for Complex Systems in Transition, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa; (S.D.); (K.M.); (R.O.B.)
- Centre for Food Policy, City University of London, London EC1V 0HB, UK
- Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
- Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, 3584 CB Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Scott Drimie
- Centre for Complex Systems in Transition, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa; (S.D.); (K.M.); (R.O.B.)
| | - Kristi Maciejewski
- Centre for Complex Systems in Transition, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa; (S.D.); (K.M.); (R.O.B.)
| | - Patrick Bon Tonissen
- Center for European Integration Research, University of Bonn, 53113 Bonn, Germany;
| | - Reinette (Oonsie) Biggs
- Centre for Complex Systems in Transition, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa; (S.D.); (K.M.); (R.O.B.)
- Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|