Growth hormone- and pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy evoke different responses to ischemia-reperfusion and mechanical stretch

Metabolic adaptations in pressure overload hypertrophic heart

This review article offers a detailed examination of metabolic adaptations in pressure overload hypertrophic hearts, a condition that plays a pivotal role in the progression of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The paper delves into the complex interplay between various metabolic pathways, including glucose metabolism, fatty acid metabolism, branched-chain amino acid metabolism, and ketone body metabolism. In-depth insights into the shifts in substrate utilization, the role of different transporter proteins, and the potential impact of hypoxia-induced injuries are discussed. Furthermore, potential therapeutic targets and strategies that could minimize myocardial injury and promote cardiac recovery in the context of pressure overload hypertrophy (POH) are examined. This work aims to contribute to a better understanding of metabolic adaptations in POH, highlighting the need for further research on potential therapeutic applications.

Growth hormone replacement delays the progression of chronic heart failure combined with growth hormone deficiency: an extension of a randomized controlled single-blind study

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-term growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy in GH-deficient patients with chronic heart failure (CHF).

BACKGROUND

Recent evidence indicates that growth hormone deficiency (GHD) affects as many as 40% of patients with CHF, and short-term GH replacement causes functional benefit. Whether long-term GH replacement also affects CHF progression is unknown.

METHODS

The study is an extension of a previous randomized, controlled single-blind trial that screened 158 consecutive CHF patients (New York Heart Association classes II to IV) and identified 63 who had GHD by the growth hormone releasing hormone plus arginine test. Fifty-six patients were randomized to receive either GH therapy or standard CHF therapy. Patients were evaluated at baseline and after a 4-year follow-up. The primary endpoint was peak oxygen consumption (VO2). Secondary endpoints included left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction and volumes, serum amino terminal fragment of the pro-hormone brain-type natriuretic peptide, quality of life, and safety.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients in the GH group and 14 in the control group completed the study. In the GH group, peak VO2 improved over the 4-year follow-up. The treatment effect was 7.1 ± 0.7 ml/kg/min versus -1.8 ± 0.5 ml/kg/min in the GH and control groups, respectively. At 4 years, LV ejection fraction increased by 10 ± 3% in the GH group, whereas it decreased by 2 ± 5% in control patients. The treatment effect on LV end-systolic volume index was -22 ± 6 ml and 8 ± 3 ml/m(2) in the GH and control groups, respectively (all p < 0.001). No major adverse events were reported in the patients who received GH.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this is a preliminary study, the finding suggests a new therapeutic approach to a large proportion of GHD patients with CHF.

Growth hormone reduces tissue damage in rat ovaries subjected to torsion and detorsion: biochemical and histopathologic evaluation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of growth hormone (GH) as an antioxidant and tissue-protective agent and analyse the biochemical and histopathological changes in rat ovaries due to experimental ischemia and ischemia/reperfusion injury.

STUDY DESIGN

Forty-eight adult female rats were randomly divided into eight groups. In Group 1, a period of bilateral ovarian ischemia was applied. In Groups 2 and 3, 1 and 2 mg/kg of GH was administered, and 30 min later, bilateral ovarian ischemia was applied (after a 3-h period of ischemia, both ovaries were surgically removed). Group 4 received a 3-h period of ischemia followed by 3h of reperfusion. Groups 5 and 6 received 1 and 2 mg/kg of GH, respectively, 2.5 h after the induction of ischemia. At the end of a 3-h period of ischemia, bilateral vascular clips were removed, and 3h of reperfusion continued. Group 7 received a sham operation plus 2mg/kg of GH. Group 8 received a sham operation only. After the experiments, superoxide dismutase and myeloperoxidase activity and levels of glutathione and lipid peroxidation were determined, and histopathological changes were examined in all rat ovarian tissue.

RESULTS

Ischemia and ischemia/reperfusion decreased superoxide dismutase activity and glutathione levels in ovarian tissue, but increased lipid peroxidation levels and myeloperoxidase activity significantly in comparison to the sham group. The 1 and 2 mg/kg doses of GH before ischemia and ischemia/reperfusion decreased lipid peroxidation levels and myeloperoxidase activity in the experimental groups. The administration of GH before ischemia and ischemia/reperfusion treatments also increased superoxide dismutase and glutathione levels. The histopathological findings also suggested a protective role of GH in ischemia/reperfusion injury. That is, ovarian tissues in the ischemia groups showed histopathological changes, such as haemorrhage, cell degeneration, and necrotic and apoptotic cells, but these changes in the GH groups were lesser. Moreover, in the ischemia/reperfusion groups, acute inflammatory processes--such as neutrophil adhesion and migration, apoptotic and degenerative cells, stromal oedema and haemorrhage--were present. However, the ovarian tissues of the IR+GH (1 mg) group had minimal apoptotic cells, and the IR+GH (2 mg) group had no apoptotic cells. In addition, the general ovarian histological structures of these groups were similar to those of the healthy control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of GH is protective against ischemia and/or ischemia/reperfusion-induced ovarian damage. This protective effect can be attributed to the antioxidant properties of GH.