ERCP in the elderly: how safe is it? (marathons, marathon ERCPs, and marathon ERCPs in the elderly)

Assessment of safety of non-anesthesiologist-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography based on performance status in elderly patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been increasingly performed in the elderly patients, yet little is known concerning objective criteria of safety. This study aimed to determine the potential predictors for the procedure-related outcomes.

METHODS

Two hundred eighty-one patients older than 70 years who were indicated for ERCP (group A [n = 195], 70-79 years of age; group B [n = 86], ≥ 80 years of age) were prospectively enrolled and analyzed for the development of serious adverse events related to ERCP.

RESULTS

ERCP was not performed in six patients at high risk for the procedure. There were significant differences between group A and B in Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) (23.1 vs 14.9, P < 0.01) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (3 and 4, 49/195 vs 33/86, P < 0.05). Major ERCP-related complications (hypotension, severe bradycardia, hypoxia, myocardial infarction, cerebral infarction) occurred in five patients from group B and three from group A. Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in one patient from group A and bleeding in one from group B. In univariate analysis, old age (≥ 80 years), American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥ 3, and DASI < 10 were statistically significant predictors for overall serious events related to ERCP. In the multivariate analysis, DASI < 10 (only manage to ambulate) was independent predictor for overall serious events related to ERCP.

CONCLUSION

DASI score is useful predictor for the feasibility assessment of safe ERCP in the elderly patients.

Combined ERCP and EUS in one session is safe in elderly patients when compared to non-elderly patients: outcomes in 206 combined procedures

AIMS

Combined ERCP/EUS is becoming common. Combined procedures are frequently performed in elderly patients. We hypothesized that combined ERCP/EUS is equally safe in elderly patients when compared to non-elderly patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective single-center study comparing outcomes in elderly and non-elderly patients undergoing combined ERCP/EUS.

RESULTS

A total of 206 patients were included. Mean age was 65 years (M:F 113:93); 99 were <65 years and 107 were >65. Indications included: jaundice (51%), abnormal imaging (17%), pancreatic tumor (11%), abdominal pain (5%), stent placement/change (5%), acute or chronic pancreatitis (5%), other (6%). Fine needle aspiration was performed in 134 (65%) procedures. Malignancy was identified in 142/206 (69%) patients. Mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 7.5 (range 0-22). Among patients <65 years old there were no immediate adverse events. Long-term adverse events in patients <65 (within 30 days) included cholangitis (1), increasing abdominal pain (4), post-ERCP pancreatitis (3), nausea/vomiting (1), increasing fatigue (1), and increasing jaundice (1). A subgroup analysis among geriatric patients (>65) was performed. Mean CCI was 8.2 (range 0-22). There was one immediate adverse event of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia in a 76-year old. Long-term adverse events included increasing fatigue (1), nausea/vomiting (2), increasing abdominal pain (2), urosepsis (1), fever (2) and dehydration (1). There were no statistically significant differences in outcomes in elderly compared to non-elderly patients. Elderly patients had higher CCI scores (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Combined ERCP/EUS in one session is safe in the general population and elderly patients, with no more adverse events than in non-elderly patients.

EUS and ERCP complication rates are not increased in elderly patients

BACKGROUND

Further studies evaluating the safety of advanced endoscopic procedures in elderly patients are needed.

AIM

To evaluate the safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the elderly.

METHODS

The study population, consisting of 1,000 patients who underwent ERCP or EUS, was divided into two cohorts. The elderly cohort consisted of patients ≥ 75 years old. The nonelderly cohort consisted of patients <75 years old. The data collected included demographic information, type of procedure completed, procedure medication used, and endoscopic intervention performed. Complications included any event which occurred during the procedure or up to 1 month post procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 600 ERCPs and 400 EUS were included. The mean age of the elderly cohort was 80 years (range 75-95 years, n = 184) versus 54 years (range 13-74 years, n = 816) for the nonelderly cohort. The ERCP complication rate was 10.0% in the elderly versus 10.6% (P = 1.0) for the nonelderly. The EUS complication rate was 4.8% in the elderly versus 3.1% in the nonelderly (P = 0.49). The overall complication rates were identical at 7.6% (P = 1.0). Sedation doses were lower for the elderly cohort (P < 0.001). There was a higher rate of procedure bleeding in the elderly cohort (P = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

Advanced age is not a contraindication for advanced endoscopic procedures. There is no significant increase in the rate of overall procedure-related complications seen with either ERCP or EUS in elderly patients; however, elderly patients have a higher risk of bleeding. Less procedure-related sedation medication is required for elderly patients.

Updates in biliary endoscopy 2006

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is reserved primarily for therapeutic reasons. Recent literature continues to support therapeutic uses of the technique. This review addresses the literature in the field of biliary endoscopy for the year 2006 and is intended to assist gastroenterologists and gastrointestinal surgeons in everyday practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

Endoscopic management of choledocholithiasis in gallstone pancreatitis, a newer approach in the endoscopic management of malignant biliary strictures, the broadening therapeutic indications including the use of gallbladder stenting and the performance of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass are discussed. Safety of the technique continues to be addressed. The risks of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as well as morbidity in the elderly are addressed.

SUMMARY

Major updates in the management of biliary tract disease using biliary endoscopy are discussed over a broad range of biliary tract diseases. The literature emphasizes the broadening therapeutic role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as well as improvements in our understanding of risk factors for complications and the potential for their prevention.