Stents for palliating malignant dysphagia and fistula: is the paradigm shifting?

Palliative radiotherapy combined with stent insertion to relieve dysphagia in advanced esophageal carcinoma patients: A systematic review and meta−analysis

Introduction

Esophageal cancer is one of the most aggressive malignancies with limited treatment options, thus resulting in high morbidity and mortality. For patients with advanced esophageal cancer, the median survival is 3–6 months, with the majority requiring intervention for dysphagia.

Objective

To compare the relief of dysphagia in patients with incurable esophageal cancer treated with stenting alone or a combination of stenting and palliative radiotherapy.

Methods

The protocol of this study was pre-registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022337481). We searched PubMed, Wan Fang, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases. The literature search, quality assessment, and data extraction were conducted by two reviewers independently. The primary endpoints included median overall survival and dysphagia scores. Bleeding events, stent migration, and pain events were secondary outcomes. The meta-analysis results (the primary and secondary outcomes) were pooled by means of a random-effect model or a fixed-effects model.

Results

Nine studies with a total of 851 patients were included in this meta-analysis, consisting of 412 patients in the stenting alone group and 439 patients in the palliative radiotherapy after esophageal cancer stenting (ROCS) group. The ROCS group could significantly improve dysphagia scores (SMD: −0.77; 95% CI: −1.02 to −0.51) and median overall survival (SMD: 1.70; 95% CI: 0.67–2.72). Moreover, there were no significant differences between the two groups in bleeding events, pain events, and stent migration.

Conclusion

Patients with dysphagia in advanced esophageal cancer may benefit further from ROCS in median overall survival and dysphagia scores. However, there was no significant advantage in improving bleeding events, pain events, and stent migration. Therefore, it is urgent to find a better therapy to improve adverse events in the future.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022337481.

Malignant esophagorespiratory fistulas: a comparative effectiveness survival analysis

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the survival of patients with malignant esophagorespiratory fistulas (ERF) and perform a comparative effectiveness analysis of ERF-directed interventions.

METHODS

Fifty-five patients met our inclusion criteria, and data on ERF-directed interventions (stent placement, surgical repair and best supportive care) and their outcomes, along with clinical and treatment details, were recorded. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and survival after developing ERF (F-OS).

RESULTS

The median OS and F-OS for the entire cohort was 299 days (SE=23.2) and 123 days (SE=11.63), respectively. On univariable analysis, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage (I-III vs IV) influenced both OS (403 vs 171 days; p=0.006) and F-OS (129 vs 67 days; p=0.034). Proximal location of ERF influenced OS favourably (494 vs 285 days; p=0.021), whereas patients developing ERF late in their disease course experienced inferior F-OS (96 vs 232 days; p=0.03). On multivariable analysis, the AJCC stage (IV vs I-III, HR=3.03 (1.41-6.50)), time to developing ERF from diagnosis (greater than vs within 3 months, HR=5.82 (1.84-18.36)) and location of ERF (distal vs proximal, HR=2.47 (1.14-5.34)) had a significant impact on F-OS. The comparative efficacy (OS and F-OS) of best supportive care was statistically equivalent to any intervention irrespective of AJCC stage and success/failure of initial or subsequent intervention(s).

CONCLUSIONS

The survival of patients with ERF is dismal, and our analysis suggests that best supportive care results in equivalent OS and F-OS when compared with any intervention.

Massive hemorrhage following definitive esophageal chemoradiation: teaching case of a fatal aortoesophageal fistula and lessons learned

Esophageal self‐expandable metal stents and radiotherapy are valuable in combination for palliation and definitive treatment of esophageal cancer. However, risk of aortoesophageal fistula is significant in patients with evidence of malignant aortic invasion. Use of thoracic endovascular repair may represent an approach to early intervention in high‐risk patients.

Anesthetic Approach for Endoscopic Repair of Acquired Tracheoesophageal Fistula

Tracheoesophageal fistula develops in 5 % to 15 % of patients with esophageal cancer. Metal stent placement can be used for treatment. Stent placement can result in aspiration, hemorrhage, perforation, migration, and pneumonia. Patients may present for medical attention with unanticipated worsening of the fistula and stent displacement requiring special anesthetic care. We discuss the perianesthetic management of a patient with malignant tracheoesophageal fistula and stent migration who presented for endoscopic esophageal stent replacement.

History of the Use of Esophageal Stent in Management of Dysphagia and Its Improvement Over the Years

The art and science of using stents to treat dysphagia and seal fistula, leaks and perforations has been evolving. Lessons learnt from the deficiencies of previous models led to several improvements making stent deployment easier, and with some designs, it was also possible to remove the stents if needed. With these improvements, besides malignant dysphagia, newer indications for using stents emerged. Unfortunately, despite several decades of evolution, as yet, there is no perfect stent that "fits all." This article is an overview of how this evolution process happened and where we are currently with using stents to manage patients with dysphagia and with other esophageal disorders.

Clinical outcomes of esophageal stents in patients with malignant esophageal obstruction according to palliative additional treatment

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of esophageal self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) insertion for malignant esophageal obstruction (MEO) in patients with or without additional palliative treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of the patients with SEMS for MEO. Baseline characteristics, changes in Mellow-Pinkas dysphagia score, and adverse events were collected and compared according to the presence and absence of additional palliative treatment.

RESULTS

Altogether 192 patients underwent 236 SEMS insertion procedures. Esophageal, gastric cardiac and lung cancers were seen in 46.4%, 33.3% and 15.1% of the patients, respectively. Their Mellow-Pinkas score significantly decreased within one week and one month after the SEMS insertion (1.66 ± 0.79 and 1.71  ±  0.87 vs 3.09  ±  0.79, respectively, P =  0.000). Complications occurred in 54 (22.9%) of 236 SEMS insertion; there were 28 (11.9%) stent obstruction, 5 (2.1%) perforation (2.1%), 10 (4.2%) stent migration, 5 (2.1%) tracheoesophageal fistula, but no procedure-related death. Most complications were managed by inserting additional SEMS. The risk of stent obstruction was significantly higher in uncovered stents than in covered SEMS (OR 3.56, 95% CI 1.39-9.12, P = 0.006). Mean duration to the development of complications was 74.8 ± 111.1 days. Overall survival (169.0 ± 127.8 days vs 96.4 ± 90.6 days, P = 0.000) and stent patency (143.3 ± 123.9 days vs 67.6 ± 71.3 days, P = 0.000) were significantly favorable in patients with SEMS and additional palliative treatments compared with those with SEMS alone.

CONCLUSION

SEMS insertion is effective and safe for treating MEO, and additional palliative treatment might lengthen stent patency by prolonging the patient's survival.

Stent-in-stent technique for removal of embedded partially covered self-expanding metal stents

BACKGROUND

Removal of embedded partially covered self-expanding metal stents (PCSEMS) is associated with an increased risk of adverse events compared with removal of fully covered self-expanding stents (FCSES) due to tissue ingrowth. Successful removal of embedded PCSEMS has been described by the stent-in-stent (SIS) technique.

AIMS

To report the first US experience from three high-volume quaternary care centers on the safety and efficacy of the SIS technique for removal of embedded PCSEMS.

METHODS

Retrospective study of outcomes for consecutive patients who underwent the SIS for removal of embedded PCSEMS over a 5-year period.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven embedded PCSEMS were successfully removed using the SIS technique (100 %) from 25 patients (11 males), median age 65 (range 37-80). All stents were successfully removed in one endoscopic session (no repeat SIS procedures were required for persistently embedded stents). The embedded PCSEMS had been in situ for a median of 76 days (range 26-501). Median SIS dwell time (FCSES in situ of PCSEMS) was 13 days (interquartile range 8-16 days; range 4-212 days). One adverse event (self-limited bleeding) occurred during a median follow-up period of 3 months (range 1-32). No patients died, required surgery, or had long-term disability due to adverse events attributed to the SIS technique. Twelve patients required additional interventions following SIS procedure for persistence or recurrence of the underlying pathology.

CONCLUSION

When performed by experienced endoscopists, safe and effective removal of embedded PCSEMS can be achieved via the SIS technique.

Efficacy and safety of a new fully covered self-expandable non-foreshortening metal esophageal stent

BACKGROUND

Fully covered esophageal self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) are potentially removable but can be associated with high migration rates. For precise positioning, non-foreshortening SEMSs are preferred. Recently, a new fully covered non-foreshortening SEMS with anti-migration features was introduced.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of this new esophageal SEMS.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Single, tertiary-care center.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients with malignant and benign strictures with dysphagia grade of ≥3 and patients with fistulas/leaks were studied.

INTERVENTIONS

Stent placement and removal.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Technical success in stent deployment/removal, efficacy in relieving dysphagia and sealing fistulas/leaks, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Forty-three stents were placed in 35 patients (mean [± standard deviation] age 65 ± 11 years; 31 male), 24 for malignant and 11 for benign (5 strictures, 6 leaks) indications. Technical success in precise SEMS placement was 100%. The after-stent dysphagia grade improved significantly (at 1 week: 1.5 ± 0.7; at 4 weeks: 1.2 ± 0.4; baseline: 3.8 ± 0.4; P < .0001). Twenty stents were removed for clinical indications, with technical success of 100%. All leaks sealed after SEMS placement and did not recur after stent removal. All benign strictures recurred after stent removal. Adverse events included migration (14%), chest pain (11%), and dysphagia from tissue hyperplasia (6%). There was no stent-related mortality.

LIMITATIONS

Nonrandomized, single-center study.

CONCLUSION

The new esophageal SEMS was effective in relieving malignant dysphagia, allowed for precise placement, and was easily removable. It was effective in treating benign esophageal fistulas and leaks. Stent-related adverse events were acceptable.

Stents for benign and malignant esophageal strictures

This paper presents commentaries on endotherapy for esophageal perforation/leaks; treatment of esophageal perforation; whether esophageal stents should be used for treating benign esophageal strictures; what determines the optimal stenting period in benign esophageal strictures/leaks; how to choose an esophageal stent; how a new fistula secondary to an esophageal stent should be treated; which strategy should be adopted when a fistula of a cervical anastomosis occurs; intralesional steroids for refractory esophageal strictures; balloon and bougie dilators for esophageal strictures and predictors of response to dilation; whether refractory strictures from different etiologies respond differently to endotherapy; surgical therapy of benign esophageal strictures; and whether stenoses following severe esophageal burns should be treated by esophageal resection or esophageal bypass.

Palliative stenting with or without radiotherapy for inoperable esophageal carcinoma: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

A majority of patients with esophageal cancer present with inoperable disease and require rapid and long-lasting palliation of dysphagia.

STUDY AIM

To compare the duration of relief of dysphagia in patients with inoperable esophageal cancer treated with esophageal stenting alone or a combination of esophageal stenting and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), and to assess overall survival, treatment-related complications, and quality of life (QOL) in the two groups.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with inoperable esophageal cancer and with high grade dysphagia were randomized to receive esophageal stenting with self-expandable metal stent (Ultraflex) alone (Group I), versus a combination of stenting followed by EBRT (30 gray in ten divided fractions over 2 weeks) (Group II). Dysphagia relief, overall survival, QOL (using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30, version 3), and treatment-related complications were assessed in the two groups.

RESULTS

From April 2007 to March 2009, 84 patients were randomized to receive esophageal stent alone (42 patients) or a combination of stent and EBRT (42 patients). The two groups were comparable in demographics, tumor characteristics, indications for palliative treatment, and pretreatment dysphagia score. Dysphagia scores improved significantly in both groups following stent insertion. However, dysphagia relief was more sustained in Group II than in Group I (7 vs. 3 months, p = 0.002). Overall median survival was significantly higher in Group II than in Group I (180 vs. 120 days, p = 0.009). Addition of radiotherapy following stenting prolonged the mean dysphagia-free survival (118.6 ± 55.8 vs. 96.8 ± 43.0 days, p = 0.054). There was significant improvement in all QOL parameters at 1 week after stenting. The QOL, however, significantly declined immediately after radiotherapy. There was no treatment-related mortality, and the incidence of complications was similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Post-stenting EBRT effectively prolongs duration of dysphagia relief and improves overall survival in inoperable esophageal cancer.

Fully covered removable nitinol self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) in malignant strictures of the esophagus: a multicenter analysis

BACKGROUND

Fully covered esophageal self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) often are used for palliation of malignant dysphagia. However, experience and data on these stents are still limited. The purpose of this multicenter study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fully covered nitinol SEMS in patients with malignant dysphagia.

METHODS

37 patients underwent placement of a SEMS during a 3 year period. Five patients underwent SEMS placement as a bridge to surgery: one for tracheoesophageal fistula in the setting of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus, one for perforation in setting of esophageal adenocarcinoma, 27 for unresectable esophageal cancer (16 adenocarcinoma, 11 squamous cell carcinoma), two for lung cancer, and one for breast-cancer-related esophageal strictures.

RESULTS

SEMS placement was successful in all 37 patients. Immediate complications after stent deployment included chest pain (n = 6), severe heartburn (n = 1), and upper gastrointestinal bleeding requiring SEMS revision (n = 1). Dysphagia scores improved significantly from 3.2 ± 0.4 before stent placement to 1.4 ± 1.0 at 1 month (P < 0.0001), 1.1 ± 1.2 (P < 0.0001) at 3 months, and 1.3 ± 1.4 (P = 0.0018) at 6 months. The stent was removed in 11 patients (30%) for the following indications: resolution of stricture (n = 3), stent malfunction (n = 5), and stent migration (n = 3). After stent removal, three patients were restented, three underwent dilation, and two underwent PEG placement. Mean survival for the 37 patients after stent placement was 146.3 ± 143.6 (range, 13-680) days.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that fully covered SEMS placement improve dysphagia scores in patients with malignant strictures, particularly in the unresectable population. Further technical improvements in design to minimize long-term malfunction and migration are required.

[Palliative management of malignant oesophageal strictures with endoprosthesis implantation -- 25 years experience]

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to analyse the feasibility of the use of oesophageal endoprosthesis based on a large series of cases.

METHODS

2952 malignant oesophageal strictures managed between 1984 and 2009 were analysed. While surgical intubation was carried out in 42 patients, endoscopic implantation was feasible in 1143 cases. Patients not eligible for oesophageal stenting were treated with gastrostomy in 125, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in 19, catheter jejunostomy in 9 and supportive therapy in 965 cases, respectively.

RESULTS

Endoprosthesis could have been inserted in 61.2% of the patients. Dysphagia was terminated temporarily in 6.2% and permanently in 93.5%. Complications were detected in 23.7% of the cases, which included stent migration, perforation, bleeding, airway obstruction, early unexpected death, aspiration, stent obstruction, tumor overgrowth, oesophago-respiratory fistula formation and neoformation, and reflux. Complications were treated endoscopically primarily (69.2%). Lethal complication rate was 2.1% (27 cases). Furthermore, complication rate of patients who underwent surgical stent insertion was 21.9%. Mean survival of patients with oesophageal intubation was 5.4 months, with nutritional support via gastrostomy, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy or jejunostomy 3.6 months and with supportive therapy alone 3.2 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Oesophageal endoprosthesis insertion is an effective method for the palliative management of malignant oesophageal strictures. Stent implantation improves survival as well as quality of life. Methods used for nutritional support decreases hungriness but do not influence survival.

The use of self-expanding plastic stents in the management of oesophageal leaks and spontaneous oesophageal perforations

Leakage after oesophageal anastomosis or perforation remains a challenge for the surgeon. Traditional management has been operative repair or intensive conservative management. Both treatments are associated with prolonged hospitalisation and high morbidity and mortality rates. Self-expanding metallic stents have played an important role in the palliation of malignant oesophageal strictures and the treatment of tracheoesophageal fistulae. However, self-expanding metal stents in benign oesophageal disease are associated with complications such as bleeding, food bolus impaction, stent migration, and difficulty in retrieval. The Polyflex stent is the only commercially available self-expanding plastic stent which has been used in the management of malignant oesophageal strictures with good results. This review will consider the literature concerning the use of self-expanding plastic stents in the treatment of oesophageal anastomotic leakage and spontaneous perforations of the oesophagus.

Expandable stents for benign esophageal disease

Partially covered self-expandable esophageal stents have been associated with unacceptable complications when used for benign esophageal disorders. With the introduction of removable or potentially removable fully covered stents and biodegradable stents, interest in using expandable stents for benign indications has been revived. Although expandable stents can offer a minimally invasive alternative to surgery, they can be associated with serious complications; hence, this approach should be considered in carefully selected patients, preferably on a protocol basis.

Self-expanding plastic stent to palliate symptomatic tissue in/overgrowth after self-expanding metal stent placement for esophageal cancer

Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) are used to treat obstructive malignancies of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction; however, a potential complication is recurrent dysphagia because of tissue in/overgrowth. The placement of a second SEMS is one strategy to re-establish patency of the esophageal lumen. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of an alternative and likely less costly approach: placing a self-expanding plastic stent (SEPS) to manage relapsing dysphagia in patients previously treated with a partially covered SEMS. From December 2007 to January 2009, 13 patients previously treated with a SEMS for malignant dysphagia underwent treatment by inserting a SEPS to palliate relapsing dysphagia, as a result of tissue in/overgrowth. Stenosis was located in the upper esophagus in one patient, in the middle in four patients, and in the lower esophagus in eight patients. Clinical evaluation was performed at the time of stent placement, after 1 week, and then, monthly until death. The SEPS was successfully placed in a single treatment session for all patients. No preliminary dilation was required, and no further treatment was necessary for any patient. Before stenting, the median dysphagia score was 4 (range 3-4), and 1 week later the score was 0 for all patients. The resolution of dysphagia persisted until patient death (from tumor progression). The mean survival after the SEPS insertion was 4 months (range 3-8). This case series supports the use of a SEPS to palliate dysphagia from tissue in/overgrowth of a SEMS. Future clinical trials with larger patient samples are warranted.

Characteristics of esophagorespiratory fistulas resulting from esophageal cancers: a single-center study on 243 cases in a 20-year period

BACKGROUND

Esophagorespiratory fistulas are serious complications of esophageal tumors. The main goal of this study was to reveal their characteristics.

METHODS

In the period between 1984 and 2004, 243 fistulas were diagnosed among the 1993 patients with esophageal cancer. Comparing the characteristic data of patients with and without fistula (demographics, symptoms, duration time of symptoms, morphologic features, histology, metastases, staging), multivariance analysis showed significant differences (P < 0.05). Patients with fistula were divided into two additional groups (I, n = 82; II, n = 161 cases) with cluster analysis. The difference between these two groups was also significant.

RESULTS

It was possible to perform a palliative endoscopic intubation in 176 cases, while 62 patients could be treated only supportively. The average survival was 3.4 and 1.2 months, respectively. Fistula was a late complication of tumor in two thirds (66.3%) of the cases, while in 33.7% it was diagnosed in younger patients at the early stage of the disease, with a more aggressive, less differentiated histology. In these patients the weight loss, the grade of dysphagia, and the size of the tumor were smaller, the possibilities of treatment were fewer, and survival time was shorter (2.1 vs. 3.1 months).

CONCLUSIONS

These tumors seem to be specific forms of esophageal cancers. For a better quality of life and longer survival time for these patients, there should be earlier diagnosis and endoscopic intubation as the best palliative treatment should be performed.

[Pathological characteristics of esophago-respiratory fistulas of esophageal tumor origin]

Esophago-respiratory fistulas, evolving as a result of esophageal tumors, are serious and lethal complications on account of the constant respiratory contamination and the inability to swallow. They can develop either as the complication of the end stage disease or sometimes even in the first stage of the malignancy. The objective was to reveal the characteristics of the disease. In a prospective single-center study in the period between 1984 and 2004, 243 fistulas were diagnosed. Their data were analyzed using multivariate analysis. The mean age of patients with fistula was 56.9 years, the male-to-female ratio was 4.3:1. The average time of the complaints was 5.2 months, while the time of manifestation of the fistula was 7.5 months. Dysphagia was diagnosed in 97.5% of the patients, fever in 36.9%, and cachexia in 59.5%, respectively. The average loss of weight was 10.4 kg and the average size of the tumor was 7.7 cm. Endoscopic intubation was performed in 176 cases. The average survival was 3.4 months. Patients with fistula were divided into two groups, where the characteristics of the disease were significantly different. Only in 66.3% was the fistula a late complication. In the other 33.7% of the cases the fistula was diagnosed in younger patients at the early stage of the disease, with a more aggressive, less differentiated histology. In these patients the weight loss, the grade of dysphagia and the size of the tumor were smaller, the possibilities of treatment were fewer, and survival were shorter.

Endoscopic stenting-Where are we now and where can we go?

Self expanding metal stents (SEMS) play an important role in the management of malignant obstructing lesions in the gastrointestinal tract. Traditionally, they have been used for palliation in malignant gastric outlet and colonic obstruction and esophageal malignancy. The development of the polyflex stent, which is a removable self expanding plastic stent, allows temporary stent insertion for benign esophageal disease and possibly for patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to esophagectomy. Potential complications of SEMS insertion include perforation, tumour overgrowth or ingrowth, and stent migration. Newer stents are being developed with the aim of increasing technical and clinical success rates, while reducing complication rates. Other areas of development include biodegradable stents for benign disease and radioactive or drug-eluting stents for malignant disease. It is hoped that, in the future, newer stents will improve our management of these difficult conditions and, possibly, provide prognostic as well as symptomatic benefit in the setting of malignant obstruction.

Stents in the GI tract

The application of stents in the GI tract has expanded tremendously. Stent placement is the most frequently used treatment modality for palliating dysphagia from esophageal or gastric cardia cancer. Newly designed esophageal stents, including the Polyflex stent and the Niti-S double stent, have been introduced to reduce recurrent dysphagia owing to migration or nontumoral or tumor overgrowth. Stents are also the treatment of choice for esophagorespiratory fistulas, for proximal malignant lesions near the upper esophageal sphincter, for recurrent carcinoma after esophagectomy or gastrectomy and for sealing traumatic or iatrogenic nonmalignant ruptures, such as Boerhaave's syndrome and leakages following surgery. Stents in the latter patient group should be removed within 4-8 weeks after placement to prevent the formation of granulation tissue or hyperplasia at the stent ends. For gastric outlet obstruction, many case series have been published. Only two, small, randomized controlled trials have compared stent placement with gastrojejunostomy to date, and a large, randomized trial is currently being conducted in The Netherlands. Obstructive jaundice caused by a malignancy in the common bile duct can be treated effectively with plastic or metal stent placement. However, a prognostic score needs to be developed that guides a treatment decision towards using either of these stents. Finally, colonic stents are applied successfully for acute malignant obstruction as a 'bridge to surgery' in patients with tumors that are deemed to be resectable, or as a palliative treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease.

A randomized prospective comparison of self-expandable plastic stents and partially covered self-expandable metal stents in the palliation of malignant esophageal dysphagia

OBJECTIVES

Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) provide effective palliation in patients with malignant dysphagia, although severe complications and mortality may result. We performed a prospective controlled trial to compare a new self-expanding polyester mesh stent (Polyflex) with SEMS (Ultraflex).

METHODS

One hundred one patients with unresectable esophageal carcinoma were randomized to placement of a Polyflex (N=47) or a partially covered Ultraflex (N=54) stent. Patients with esophagogastric junction (EGJ) malignancy were excluded.

RESULTS

Placement was successful in 46 (98%) patients with the Polyflex and 54 (100%) patients with the Ultraflex stent. In one patient, the Polyflex stent could not be placed. After 1 wk, dysphagia was improved by at least 1 grade in 100% of the Polyflex group and in 94% of the Ultraflex group. Major complications were observed in 48% of the Polyflex group and 33% of the Ultraflex group. Intraprocedural perforation occurred in 1 Polyflex and 1 Ultraflex patient. Two Polyflex patients had postprocedural hemorrhage. Twenty (44%) patients with a Polyflex stent and 18 (33%) with an Ultraflex stent had recurrent dysphagia because of tumor overgrowth, stent migration, hyperplastic granulomatous reaction, or food bolus impaction. Multivariate analysis showed a significantly higher complication rate with Polyflex than with Ultraflex stents (odds ratio 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.4). However, median survival was 134 days with Polyflex and 122 days with Ultraflex stents (P=NS).

CONCLUSIONS

No difference was seen in palliation of dysphagia between the two stents. Significantly more complications, especially late stent migration, were observed in the Polyflex group.