Look, remove, and discard: can narrow-band imaging replace histopathology for small colorectal polyps? It is time to push the button!

Detection and characterization of colorectal polyps using high-definition white light and i-Scan: Evidence-based consensus recommendations using a modified Delphi process

Background

i-Scan is an image enhancement modality, which provides enhanced views of mucosal structures and vascular patterns.

Methods

A modified Delphi process was used to develop a series of evidence-based statements on the role of high-definition white light (HDWL) and i-Scan for the detection and diagnosis of colorectal neoplasms. Each statement was voted to achieve consensus (i.e. >80% agreement).

Results

Seven proposed statements achieved consensus: (1) HDWL is recommended rather than standard definition (SD) for detection and diagnosis of colorectal neoplasms; (2) HDWL colonoscopy with i-Scan improves polyp and adenoma detection rates when compared with SD colonoscopy; (3) HDWL + i-Scan is superior to HDWL alone for the optical diagnosis of colorectal neoplasms; (4) HDWL + i-Scan in expert hands meets American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) in the Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations (PIVI) standards for optical diagnosis of diminutive neoplasms; (5) HDWL + i-Scan in non-expert hands does not meet ASGE PIVI standards for optical diagnosis of diminutive neoplasms; (6) optical diagnosis of polyps with i-Scan has a learning curve and needs systematic training; and (7) the performance of i-Scan for the in vivo diagnosis of colorectal neoplasms is similar to Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) and Fuji Intelligent Chromo Endoscopy (FICE).

Conclusions

Seven proposed statements on the use of HDWL and i-Scan for the detection and diagnosis of colorectal neoplasms achieved consensus.

Optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps using high-definition i-scan: An educational experience

AIM: To examine performances regarding prediction of polyp histology using high-definition (HD) i-scan in a group of endoscopists with varying levels of experience.

METHODS: We used a digital library of HD i-scan still images, comprising twin pictures (surface enhancement and tone enhancement), collected at our university hospital. We defined endoscopic features of adenomatous and non-adenomatous polyps, according to the following parameters: color, surface pattern and vascular pattern. We familiarized the participating endoscopists on optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps using a 20-min didactic training session. All endoscopists were asked to evaluate an image set of 50 colorectal polyps with regard to polyp histology. We classified the diagnoses into high confidence (i.e., cases in which the endoscopist could assign a diagnosis with certainty) and low confidence diagnoses (i.e., cases in which the endoscopist preferred to send the polyp for formal histology). Mean sensitivity, specificity and accuracy per endoscopist/image were computed and differences between groups tested using independent-samples t tests. High vs low confidence diagnoses were compared using the paired-samples t test.

RESULTS: Eleven endoscopists without previous experience on optical diagnosis evaluated a total of 550 images (396 adenomatous, 154 non-adenomatous). Mean sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for diagnosing adenomas were 79.3%, 85.7% and 81.1%, respectively. No significant differences were found between gastroenterologists and trainees regarding performances of optical diagnosis (mean accuracy 78.0% vs 82.9%, P = 0.098). Diminutive lesions were predicted with a lower mean accuracy as compared to non-diminutive lesions (74.2% vs 93.1%, P = 0.008). A total of 446 (81.1%) diagnoses were made with high confidence. High confidence diagnoses corresponded to a significantly higher mean accuracy than low confidence diagnoses (84.0% vs 64.3%, P = 0.008). A total of 319 (58.0%) images were evaluated as having excellent quality. Considering excellent quality images in conjunction with high confidence diagnosis, overall accuracy increased to 92.8%.

CONCLUSION: After a single training session, endoscopists with varying levels of experience can already provide optical diagnosis with an accuracy of 84.0%.

Clinicopathological features of colorectal polyps: evaluation of the 'predict, resect and discard' strategies

AIM

'Predict, resect and discard' strategies for diminutive and small colonic polyps are considered to be cost effective for treating colorectal cancers. The aim of this study was to determine, retrospectively, the histological features of colonic polyps resected by endoscopic procedures or surgery using an updated database.

METHOD

We retrospectively analysed the clinicopathological features of colorectal polyps, less than 20 mm in size, which were removed by endoscopy from January 2009 to November 2011 at the National Cancer Center Hospital (NCCH) in Tokyo, Japan.

RESULTS

Less than 1% of diminutive polyps (≤ 5 mm) were classified as mucosal high-grade neoplasia (Category 4), and no submucosal invasion by carcinoma (Category 5) lesions were noted. However, 3% of small polyps (6-9 mm) were classified as Category 5; of these, 6% were submucosal deep invasive cancers. Morphologically, depressed components were observed more frequently in carcinomas than in adenomas in both small and large polyps (10-20 mm).

CONCLUSION

In light of the 'predict, resect and discard' strategies for small polyps, we should pay attention to the possible clinical malignancy of small and large polyps. We recommend that these strategies should be applied selectively and that they should be informed by accurate endoscopic evaluations.

Meta-analysis for evaluating the accuracy of endoscopy with narrow band imaging in detecting colorectal adenomas

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The aim of this study was to determine whether the use of the narrow band imaging (NBI) system could enhance the accuracy of adenoma detection during an endoscopic examination of the colon and rectum.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched along with a hand search of abstracts from relevant conferences up to June 2011. The rates of adenoma and flat adenoma detection, and withdrawal time were analyzed using Review Manager 4.2.

RESULTS

A total of 3049 subjects in eight trials were included. Meta-analysis revealed that there was no statistically significant difference in the rates of adenoma detection between the NBI group and the white light colonoscopy group (pooled relative risk [RR]: 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-1.19, P = 0.05). However, after exclusion of high-definition television modalities, the rate of adenoma detection by NBI was significantly higher than that by white light, particularly for patients with one adenoma (pooled RR 1.36, 95%CI 1.07-1.71, P = 0.02). Endoscopy with the NBI system significantly increased the rate of flat adenoma detection (pooled RR 1.96, 95%CI 1.09-3.52, P = 0.02). However, endoscopy with NBI had longer withdrawal time than that with white light (pooled weighted mean difference: 0.90, 95%CI: 0.38-1.42, P = 0.0006).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopy with NBI seems to improve the detection of flat adenomas, particularly with high-definition technology, but prolongs the withdrawal time. These results indicate that endoscopy routinely using the NBI system for the surveillance of adenomas may be recommended after the technique is further modified.

Diagnostic accuracy of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy and narrow band imaging for small colorectal polyps: a feasibility study

OBJECTIVES

Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) allows real-time in-vivo microscopic imaging of tissue. Narrow band imaging (NBI) can also classify colorectal lesions. Both systems may allow accurate optical diagnosis of small (6-9 mm) and diminutive (1-5 mm) polyps without histopathology. This study assesses the accuracy of pCLE and NBI for prediction of histology.

METHODS

Participants underwent high-definition colonoscopy. The surface pit pattern of all polyps (1-9 mm) was determined in vivo using NBI. Confocal videos were obtained after administration of IV fluorescein. Recorded videos were subsequently analyzed offline, blinded to endoscopic characteristics, and histopathology. Confocal images were classified as neoplastic and non-neoplastic according to the Miami classification system.

RESULTS

A total of 130 polyps (58 neoplastic, 72 non-neoplastic, mean size 4.6 mm) from 65 patients were assessed. Assuming histopathology as gold standard, pCLE had higher sensitivity than NBI (86% vs. 64%, P=0.008), with lower specificity (78% vs. 92%, p=0.027) and similar overall accuracy (82% vs. 79%, P=0.59). When 65 high-confidence cases were analyzed (polyps diagnosed identically with pCLE and NBI and with high-quality confocal videos), sensitivity and specificity were 94 and 97%.

CONCLUSIONS

pCLE demonstrated higher sensitivity in predicting histology of small polyps compared with NBI, whereas NBI had higher specificity. When used in combination, the accuracy of pCLE and NBI was extremely high, approaching the accuracy of histopathology. Together, they may reduce the need for histological examination. However, further studies are warranted to evaluate the role of these techniques, especially in the population-based colon cancer screening.

Diagnostic performance of chromoendoscopy and narrow band imaging for colonic neoplasms: a meta-analysis

AIM

We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic test performance of chromoendoscopy and narrow band imaging (NBI) for colonic neoplasms.

METHOD

MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched (1966 to March 2009). Articles were included if: (i) chromoendoscopy or NBI was used, (ii) sensitivity and specificity were reported; (iii) absolute numbers of true-positive, false-positive, true-negative and false-negative results were provided or could be calculated; and (iv) pathology was used as the reference standard. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled using random effects model. Secondary analyses were conducted by limiting the studies in which magnifying endoscopy was used alone as a diagnostic modality, and polyp size and macroscopic appearance of lesions were not considered.

RESULTS

Of 1342 screened articles, 27 met the inclusion criteria. Pooled sensitivity for chromoendoscopy and NBI was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.92-0.95) and 0.94 (0.91-0.97), and specificity was 0.82 (0.77-0.88) and 0.86 (0.83-0.89), respectively. There were no differences in sensitivity (P = 0.99) or specificity (P = 0.54) between the two methods. In the secondary analysis, pooled sensitivity for choromoendoscopy and NBI was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90-0.97) and 0.96 (0.93-0.99) and specificity was 0.80 (0.73-0.87) and 0.85 (0.78-0.92). respectively. Overall, the pooled false-negative rate was 0.057 (95% CI, 0.040-0.73) for chromoendoscopy and 0.057 (95% CI, 0.028-0.085) for NBI.

CONCLUSION

Chromoendoscopy and NBI had similar diagnostic test characteristics in the assessment of colonic neoplasms; however, the false-negative rate for both methods of 5.7% is an unacceptably high rate and currently therefore, neither method is ready for general use.

Narrow-band imaging as an alternative to chromoendoscopy for the detection of dysplasia in long-standing inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective, randomized, crossover study

BACKGROUND

Narrow-band imaging (NBI) is a novel technique that may represent an alternative method to chromoendoscopy (CE) for the detection of colitis-associated intraepithelial neoplasia (IN) in patients with long-standing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

OBJECTIVE

To compare NBI with CE for the detection of IN.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, crossover study.

SETTING

Academic hospital.

PATIENTS

Patients with clinically inactive colonic IBD (≥8 years).

INTERVENTION

Patients underwent both CE and NBI in randomized order. Targeted biopsy specimens from abnormal areas were obtained. Pathological examination was regarded as the reference standard.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Number of false-positive and true-positive lesions in patients undergoing CE and NBI were compared as well as the proportion of patients with missed IN lesions.

RESULTS

Eighty patients were screened, of whom 20 were excluded. Mean ± standard deviation withdrawal time for CE was significantly longer than that for NBI (26.87 ± 9.89 minutes vs 15.74 ± 5.62 minutes, P < .01). Thirteen patients had at least 1 IN lesion on 1 of the examinations. In the per-lesion analysis, NBI resulted in a significantly inferior false-positive biopsy rate (P = .001) and a similar true-positive rate. The percentage of missed IN lesions and patients was superior with NBI, albeit without reaching statistical significance.

LIMITATIONS

Lesions were sampled immediately after detection, which precluded the possibility of paired analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

NBI appears to be a less time-consuming and equally effective alternative to CE for the detection of IN. However, given the NBI lesion and patient miss rates, it cannot be recommended as the standard technique.

Computerized virtual chromoendoscopy versus indigo carmine chromoendoscopy combined with magnification for diagnosis of small colorectal lesions: a randomized and prospective study

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Magnifying colonoscopy with indigo carmine dye and the analysis of the capillary and the pit patterns by computed virtual chromoendoscopy (Fujinon Intelligent Color Enhancement, FICE) with magnification are effective for the differential diagnosis of neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of virtual and real chromoendoscopy in differentiating neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal lesions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective randomized trial of magnification colonoscopy with targeted FICE (Group I - 72 patients/111 lesions) versus magnification colonoscopy with targeted indigo carmine dye (Group II - 72 patients/137 lesions) was performed in consecutive patients with lesions 1 cm or less. Histopathology of the specimens was regarded as the gold standard.

RESULTS

In group I, 86 (77.5%) lesions showed an intense vascular pattern (positive capillary meshwork), of which 80 (93%) were histologically confirmed as adenomas. From 25 lesions with negative capillary meshwork, 23 (92%) were non-neoplastic. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values of the capillary meshwork for the differential diagnosis of these lesions was 97.8, 79.3, 92.8, 93 and 92%, respectively. The same parameters for pit pattern analysis by FICE were 92.7, 82.3, 90.1, 93.8 and 80%, respectively. Indigo carmine magnified chromoscopy showed sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values of 97, 88.9, 94.9, 96.1 and 91.4%, respectively in the discrimination between neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions.

CONCLUSION

Magnified virtual chromoendoscopy is as accurate as indigo carmine magnified chromoendoscopy in distinguishing between neoplastic from non-neoplastic small colorectal lesions.

Intraperitoneal virtual biopsy by fibered optical coherence tomography (OCT) at natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES)

INTRODUCTION

Fibered optical coherence tomography (OCT) in conjunction with natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) could provide a facility for rapid, in situ pathological diagnosis of intraperitoneal tissues in a truly minimally invasive fashion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A large porcine model was established to test this hypothesis. A standard double channel gastroscope (Olympus) was used to achieve a transgastric access to the peritoneum and initiate the pneumoperitoneum. Magnetic retraction was used to display the sigmoid colon along with its mesentery. A commercially available fibered OCT probe (NIRIS system, Imalux) was inserted via a working channel of the gastroscope and used to assess intraperitoneal tissues. Separately, OCT images of human tissue specimens ex vivo were contrasted with representative standard histopathological slides.

RESULTS

Intraperitoneal OCT provided clear real-time images of both the serosal and muscularis propria mural layers as well as the submucosal-muscularis interface. Examination of mesenteric lymph nodes (including sentinel nodes) allowed visualization of their subcapsular sinus. Comparison of representative cross-sections however failed to evince sufficient resolution for confident diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

This approach is technically feasible and, if the technology is advanced and proven accurate in human patients, could potentially be used to individualize operative extent prior to definitive resection.

Narrow Band Imaging and Autofluorescence Imaging for the Detection and Optical Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps

Colorectal cancer is the most common cancer in Singapore and polyps which are detected during screening colonoscopy are routinely removed. Conventional white light colonoscopy has a substantial miss-rate for polyps and limited accuracy in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic polyps. Dye-based chromoendoscopy and more recent equipment-based image enhanced endoscopic techniques such as narrow-band imaging (NBI) and autofluorescence imaging (AFI) are promising tools to improve polyp detection and optical diagnosis. Current evidence suggests that NBI may not be superior compared to high definition white-light for polyp detection, but it achieves excellent accuracy in polyp characterisation, approaching that of histopathology. AFI is a wide area scanning modality which functions as a red-flag technique to improve polyp detection, although the evidence is still evolving. The ability to accurately characterise polyps with NBI and AFI will guide the management of polyps and in some cases, avoid unnecessary polypectomy and routine histopathology. This has potential to reduce associated costs and risks of polypectomy, and improves on overall efficiency of screening colonoscopy. The review will discuss the technology, current evidence and the issues relevant to the role of NBI and AFI for the detection and optical diagnosis of polyps in colorectal cancer screening.

Estudo comparativo entre MBI (FICE®) e a magnificação com índigo-carmin no diagnóstico diferencial de lesões neoplásicas e não-neoplásicas de cólon e reto

CONTEXTO: O uso da cromoscopia virtual com sistema de imagem multibanda poderia auxiliar no diagnóstico in vivo de neoplasias colônicas. Objetivo - Avaliar a exatidão da magnificação associada à cromoendoscopia eletrônica ou com índigo-carmin na distinção entre lesões neoplásicas e não-neoplásicas do cólon e reto. MÉTODOS: Foram avaliadas prospectivamente 157 lesões colorretais em 75 pacientes. Empregou-se o sistema FICE® para a análise dos padrões de capilares, com a malha capilar negativa sendo considerada padrão de lesões não-neoplásicas, e a malha capilar positiva, o padrão das neoplasias. Após esta avaliação, ainda usando o sistema FICE®, o padrão de criptas foi definido conforme a classificação de Kudo. Por fim, instilou-se índigo-carmin à 0,8% e outro estudo das criptas foi realizado. RESULTADOS: Entre as 157 lesões colorretais, classificou-se 116 como malha capilar positiva, sendo 115 confirmadas histologicamente como neoplasias. Já entre as 41 lesões com malha capilar negativa, 32 eram não-neoplásicas. A sensibilidade foi de 92,7%, a especificidade de 97% e a precisão de 93,6%. Os padrões de criptas tipo I e II representaram as lesões não-neoplásicas e os tipos III-V, as neoplásicas. Com a utilização da cromoscopia eletrônica, observou-se sensibilidade de 94,4%, especificidade de 97% e precisão de 94,9%. Já com o uso da magnificação associada ao índigo-carmin, a sensibilidade foi de 97,6%, a especificidade de 93,9% e a precisão de 96,8%. CONCLUSÕES: Tanto a cromoendoscopia eletrônica, quanto o uso do índigo-carmin, associados à magnificação de imagens, apresentaram precisão elevada quanto ao diagnóstico histopatológico e não houve diferença estatística entre ambos os métodos.

Meta-analysis: narrow band imaging for lesion characterization in the colon, oesophagus, duodenal ampulla and lung

BACKGROUND

Narrow band imaging is a new endoscopic technology that highlights mucosal surface structures and microcapillaries, which may be indicative of neoplastic change.

AIM

To assess the diagnostic precision of narrow band imaging for the diagnosis of epithelial neoplasia compared to conventional histology both overall and in specific organs.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of studies which compared narow band imaging-based diagnosis of neoplasia with histopathology as the gold standard. Search terms: 'endoscopy' and 'narrow band imaging'.

RESULTS

Five hundred and eighty-two patients and 1108 lesions in 11 studies were included. Overall, sensitivity was 0.94 (95% confidence interval 0.92-0.95), specificity 0.83 (0.80-0.86); weighted area under the curve was 0.96 (standard error 0.02), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) 72.74 (34.11-155.15). DORs were 66.65 (25.84-171.90), 61.19 (7.09-527.97), 69.74 (8.04-605.24) for colon, oesophagus and lung respectively. Studies with more than 50 patients had higher diagnostic precision, relative DOR 4.96 (1.28-19.27), P = 0.022. There was no difference in accuracy between microvessel and mucosal (pit) pattern based measures, relative DOR 1.29 (0.05-35.16), P = 0.87. There was significant heterogeneity overall between studies, Q = 31.2, P = 0.003.

CONCLUSION

Narrow band imaging is accurate with high diagnostic precision for in vivo diagnosis of neoplasia across a range of organs, using simple microvessel-based measures.

A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique

BACKGROUND

Colonoscopy has a known miss rate for polyps and adenomas. High definition (HD) colonoscopes may allow detection of subtle mucosal change, potentially aiding detection of adenomas and hyperplastic polyps.

AIM

To compare detection rates between HD and standard definition (SD) colonoscopy.

METHODS

Prospective, cohort study with optimized withdrawal technique (withdrawal time >6 min, antispasmodic, position changes, re-examining flexures and folds). One hundred and thirty patients attending for routine colonoscopy were examined with either SD (n = 72) or HD (n = 58) colonoscopes.

RESULTS

Groups were well matched. Sixty per cent of patients had at least one adenoma detected with SD vs. 71% with HD, P = 0.20, relative risk (benefit) 1.32 (95% CI 0.85-2.04). Eighty-eight adenomas (mean +/- standard deviation 1.2 +/- 1.4) were detected using SD vs. 93 (1.6 +/- 1.5) with HD, P = 0.12; however more nonflat, diminutive (<6 mm) adenomas were detected with HD, P = 0.03. Twenty-three proximal hyperplastic polyps (0.32 +/- 0.58) were detected with SD vs. 31 (0.53 +/- 0.86) with HD, P = 0.35. Overall prevalence of proximal large (>9 mm) hyperplastic polyps was 7% (0.09 +/- 0.36).

CONCLUSIONS

High definition did not lead to a significant increase in adenoma or hyperplastic polyp detection, but may help where comprehensive lesion detection is paramount. High detection rates appear possible with either SD or HD, when using an optimized withdrawal technique.

Novel approaches in colorectal endoscopy: what do we need biopsies for?

Magnification chromoendoscopy, narrow band imaging (NBI) and confocal endomicroscopy can all provide accurate assessment of small and diminutive colonic lesions for neoplastic change that approaches the accuracy of standard histopathology. It is likely that there will be a move to use these techniques in clinical practice for small and particularly diminutive, non-depressed lesions in the near future. Non-neoplastic lesions would be left in situ, and neoplastic lesions resected and disposed of without histopathological assessment. Histopathology would be reserved for larger lesions, indeterminate lesions or lesions where invasion was suspected. There are potentially significant cost savings and patient benefits, with a focussing of histopathological expertise on higher risk lesions, particularly in the era of bowel cancer screening. These techniques may also help target biopsies in colitis surveillance, removing the need for large numbers of random samples. However, in order to convince patients, histopathologists and those funding healthcare of the validity of this approach, further trial data will be needed, with an accreditation process for endoscopists wishing to take on this responsibility.