Infection after ERCP, and antibiotic prophylaxis: a sequential quality-improvement approach over 11 years

Transmission of oral microbiota to the biliary tract during endoscopic retrograde cholangiography

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) possesses a translocation risk of microbes to the biliary system. We studied bile contamination during ERC and its impact on patients' outcome in a real-life-situation.

METHODS

Ninety-nine ERCs were analyzed and microbial samples were taken from the throat before and from bile during ERC and from irrigation fluid of the duodenoscope before and after ERC.

RESULTS

91.2% of cholangitis patients had detectable microbes in the bile (sensitivity 91%), but the same was true for 86.2% in the non-cholangitis group. Bacteroides fragilis (p=0.015) was significantly associated with cholangitis. In 41.7% of ERCs with contaminated endoscopes these microbes were found in the bile after the procedure. Analysis of duodenoscopes' irrigation liquid after ERC matched the microbial bile analysis of these patients in 78.8%. Identical microbial species were in throat and in bile samples of the same ERC in 33% of all cases and in 45% in the non-cholangitis group. Transmission of microbes to the biliary tract did not result in more frequent cholangitis, longer hospital stays, or worse outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

During ERC bile samples are regularly contaminated with microbes of the oral cavity but it did not affect clinical outcome.

Development of an Online App to Predict Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Adverse Events Using a Single-Center Retrospective Cohort

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a technically demanding procedure with a high risk for adverse events (AEs).

AIM

evaluate patient- and procedure-related risk factors for ERCP-related AEs and develop an online app to estimate risk of AEs.

METHODS

retrospective study of 1,491 consecutive patients who underwent 1,991 ERCPs between 2012 and 2017 was conducted. AEs definition and severity were classified according to most recent ESGE guidelines. Each variable was tested for association with occurrence of overall AEs, post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) and cholangitis. For each outcome, 2 regression models were built, from which an online Shiny-based app was created.

RESULTS

Overall AE rate was 15.3%; in 19 procedures, >1 AE occurred. Main post-ERCP AE was PEP (7.5%), followed by cholangitis (4.9%), bleeding (1.3%), perforation (1%), cardiopulmonary events (0.9%), and cholecystitis (0.3%). Seventy-eight percent of AEs were mild/moderate; of severe (n = 55) and fatal (n = 20) AEs, more than half were related to infection, cardiac/pulmonary AEs, and perforation. AE-related mortality rate was 1%. When testing precannulation, procedural covariates, and ERCP findings, AE occurrence was associated with age (odds ratio [OR] 0.991), previous PEP (OR 2.198), ERCP complexity grade III/IV (OR 1.924), standard bile duct cannulation (OR 0.501), sphincterotomy (OR 1.441), metal biliary stent placement (OR 2.014), periprocedural bleeding (OR 3.024), and biliary duct lithiasis (OR 0.673).

CONCLUSION

Our app may allow an optimization of the patients' care, by helping in the process of decision-making, not only regarding patient or endoscopist's selection but also definition of an adequate and tailored surveillance plan after the procedure.

Significant infections in liver transplant recipients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiography are few and unaffected by prophylactic antibiotics

INTRODUCTION

Current practice guidelines recommend prophylactic antibiotics prior to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in liver transplant recipients (LTR). This study evaluated the risk of clinically significant infections after ERCP in LTR who received antibiotic prophylaxis compared to those who did not.

METHODS

This retrospective case-cohort study evaluated all LTR who underwent elective, outpatient ERCP from 2008 to 2015. Hospitalized patients, pediatric allograft recipients and patients with cholangitis or incomplete biliary drainage were excluded. The primary outcome was unanticipated hospitalization from procedure-related clinically significant infection occurring within 3 days of ERCP.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients (48 males; mean age 60.5 ± 7.4 years) underwent 191 ERCPs after liver transplantation. Prophylactic antibiotics were administered during 82 ERCPs and not administered for 109 ERCPs. Unscheduled admissions for fever within 3 days occurred in 4 patients. Only 2 patients had documented bacteremia, of which only 1 patient received prophylactic antibiotics and also met primary outcome. Interventions during ERCP, patient demographics, and time from transplantation were not associated with increased risk of hospitalization from infections or bacteremia.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of infectious complications after ERCP in LTR is low and not affected by administration of prophylactic antibiotics. A tailored approach to antibiotic prophylaxis may be more appropriate than universal prophylaxis in selected LTR at low risk of infections.