Low frequency of bacteremia after an endoscopic resection for large colorectal tumors in spite of extensive submucosal exposure

Post-endoscopic submucosal dissection phlegmonous enteritis: A case report and literature review

Background

This study presents the initial case of phlegmonous enteritis following endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), a rare and potentially fatal complication. Additionally, a comprehensive review of relevant literature is provided.

Case report

A 66-year-old female patient, diagnosed with Hashimoto's thyroiditis and thrombocytopenia, underwent ESD to address a laterally spreading tumor located in the ascending colon. After the procedure, the patient manifested abdominal pain and a high fever, was diagnosed with peritonitis, necessitating an emergency exploratory laparotomy and right hemicolectomy. Subsequent histological examination indicated a significant presence of neutrophil infiltration across all layers of the intestines. The ascites culture yielded the growth of Escherichia coli.

Literature review

A search was conducted in the PubMed database to identify case reports conforming to the definition of phlegmonous enteritis proposed by Rokitansky et al. We retrieved about 30 studies regarding phlegmonous enteritis from 1951 to 2022, with around 39 cases. Among these, only 28 patients had comprehensive medical data available. Subsequently, an examination of the literature was undertaken to explore the pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment of phlegmonous enteritis.

Conclusion

The possibility of phlegmonous enteritis should be taken into consideration in cases of unexplained acute abdomen, particularly in patients with compromised immunity, in order to provide active surgical and antibiotic interventions.

Analysis of Predictors and Risk Factors of Postpolypectomy Syndrome

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Postpolypectomy syndrome (PPS) is a relevant adverse event that can appear after polypectomy. Several publications mention postpolypectomy syndrome using different criteria to define it. The aim of this study is to detect potential risk factors and predictors for developing PPS and to define the main criteria of PPS.

METHODS

In this retrospective monocentric study, 475 out of 966 patients who underwent colonoscopy with polypectomy from October 2015 to June 2020 were included. The main criterion of PPS is defined as the development of postinterventional abdominal pain lasting more than six hours.

RESULTS

A total of 9.7% of the patients developed PPS, which was defined as local abdominal pain around the polypectomy area after six hours. A total of 8.6% of the study population had abdominal pain within six hours postintervention. A total of 3.7% had an isolated triad of fever, leukocytosis, and increased CRP in the absence of abdominal pain. Increased CRP combined with an elevated temperature over 37.5 °C seems to be a positive predictor for developing PPS. Four independent risk factors could be detected: serrated polyp morphology, polypoid configurated adenomas, polyp localization in the cecum, and the absence of intraepithelial neoplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

Four independent risk factors for developing PPS were detected. The combination of increased CRP levels with elevated temperature seems to be a predictor for this pathology. As expected, the increasing use of cold snare polypectomies will reduce the incidence of this syndrome. Key summary: Our monocentric study on 966 patients detected four independent risk factors for developing PPS: pedunculated polyp, resected polyps in the cecum, absence of IEN, and serrated polyp morphology. The combination of increased CRP levels with elevated temperature seems to be a predictor for this pathology.

Antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients undergoing endoscopic mucosal resection for 10- to 20-mm colorectal polyps: A randomized prospective study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is frequently used for the removal of colorectal neoplasms. However, the use of prophylactic antibiotics in patients undergoing EMR is debatable. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to assess whether antimicrobial prophylaxis is crucial in the perioperative period of EMR, especially for 10- to 20-mm lesions in this setting.

METHODS

Two hundred and sixty-four patients were randomized equally into 2 groups, the antibiotic (cefixime) group and the control group. The occurrence of adverse events was examined at 1 to 3 days after EMR. Plasma levels of inflammatory markers were analyzed at pre-operation, 1 day post-operation and 3 days post-operation. Blood samples collected at 1 day post-operation were used for culture.

RESULTS

A total of 264 and 268 polyps were removed by EMR in the antibiotic group and the control group, respectively. There were 5 cases of fever, with 2 in the antibiotic group and 3 in the control group. In the antibiotic group, 12 patients had abdominal pain and 10 suffered bleeding, whereas in the control group, abdominal pain and bleeding were observed in 10 and 11 patients, respectively. There were no significant differences in the proportion of patients with fever or the incidences of postoperative complications between the groups. No significant differences between the groups were reported in plasma levels of white blood cell count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein or procalcitonin at pre-operation or post-operation. No patients provided positive blood cultures.

CONCLUSIONS

The use the prophylactic antibiotics for EMR procedures in the perioperative period is no longer required when the lesions are 10 to 20 mm in size.

Pylephlebitis after sigmoid colonic polypectomy

A man in his 40s presented with a 7-day history of fever and abdominal pain after polypectomy of the sigmoid colon. On physical examination, he had mild tenderness on deep palpation of the left lower abdominal quadrants without guarding, rigidity or rebound tenderness. Contrast-enhanced CT revealed the thrombosis of the inferior mesenteric vein and the portal vein. Blood cultures were positive for Escherichia coli We diagnosed him with pylephlebitis after colonic polypectomy, as a rare complication. He was started on cefmetazole and heparin. Antibiotic and anticoagulation therapy were initiated. He had a complete recovery within 17 days. The patient had no evidence of underlying hypercoagulable condition, and no signs of recurrence at a 3-month follow-up. Pylephlebitis after colonic polypectomy is extremely rare. Although bacteraemia after colonoscopy was a rare complication, phlebitis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients who present with persisted fever and abdominal pain after polypectomy.

Post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome: a clinical overview

INTRODUCTION

Post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome (PEECS) is a rare complication following endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, many aspects of PEECS are still controversial and there is a lack of up-to-date review. The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive review on PEECS.

AREAS COVERED

The English-language literature was searched for articles on PEECS, with a focus on its pathogenesis, definition, and diagnosis, incidence rate, risk factors, prevention, management, and prognosis.

EXPERT OPINION

Many aspects of PEECS are still controversial such as etiology, diagnostic criteria, prevention and management. The recent studies tend to agree on the diagnostic criteria for PEECS, defined as localized abdominal tenderness and fever or inflammatory response without delayed perforation. Most patients with PEECS have a favorable prognosis with conservative treatment and more high-quality studies are needed in the controversial aspects mentioned above.

Influence of Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection on the Changes of Energy Metabolism during the Perioperative Period

Esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is considered to be more complex than gastric ESD. This study aimed to assess the physical invasiveness of esophageal ESD during perioperative periods by measuring resting energy expenditure (REE). The factors affecting REE that could be used to identify patients requiring perioperative management were also investigated. Overall, 75 patients who had undergone esophageal ESD were prospectively enrolled. REE, body weight, and basal energy expenditure were measured on the day of and the day following ESD. The mean REE/body weight was 20.2 kcal/kg/day on the day of ESD and significantly increased to 23.0 kcal/kg/day one day after ESD. The stress factor on the day after ESD was 1.11. White blood cell, neutrophil, and C-reactive protein levels increased on the day after ESD and correlated with the changes in REE. Among the factors including age, body mass index, total resection area, operation time, and sarcopenia, only the total resection area was associated with changes in REE. In conclusion, energy metabolism increases during the perioperative period for esophageal ESD. The increase in the stress factor for esophageal ESD was higher than that in gastric and colorectal ESD. Furthermore, patients with large resection areas require greater attention in perioperative management. 

Hepatic portal venous gas and bacteremia after colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection: A case report

Hepatic portal venous gas (HPVG) is considered to be a sign of poor prognosis in abdominal diseases and a potentially fatal condition. However, HPVG after colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), is an even rarer complication that there is just one report of it at the moment. In this report, we present a case of HPVG and bacteremia that happened a day after colonic ESD in the descending colon. A 79‐year‐old female was referred to perform endoscopic treatment for a 40‐mm elevated tumor in the descending colon and surgery for clinical T1b cancer in the rectosigmoid colon. With a preoperative diagnosis of intramucosal carcinoma in adenoma, we performed ESD using carbon dioxide insufflation. The tumor was resected en bloc without any adverse events including perforation. On the following day, shivering and a fever of 38°C suddenly developed with no abdominal symptoms. Computed tomography revealed the presence of HPVG and gas in the middle colic vein without pneumoperitoneum. The patient was managed conservatively with fasting and intravenous antibiotic treatment. We confirmed the disappearance of the findings with computed tomography on the next day of the first computed tomography and with a colonoscope, we observed the base of ESD ulcer 5 days post‐ESD. HPVG might be treated conservatively, but it might cause more severe conditions such as air embolism, so this rare complication still needs to be thoroughly monitored.

Fever and electrocoagulation syndrome after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for patients with immunosuppressants and steroids

Objectives

Transient fever and electrocoagulation syndrome after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) remain a challenge. The aim of this study was to assess the risk factors of post‐ESD fever and post‐ESD coagulation syndrome (PECS), focusing on the involvement of immunosuppressive drugs and steroids (IM).

Methods

This retrospective analysis included 510 patients who underwent colorectal ESD at Okayama University Hospital from 2015 to 2020. The incidence rate, clinical outcome, and factors associated with post‐ESD fever and PECS were investigated.

Results

Post‐ESD fever and PECS occurred in 63 patients (12.4%) and 43 patients (8.4%), respectively. In multivariate analysis, the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status ≥3, the use of immunosuppressants or prednisolone ≥5mg (IM group), and injury to muscle layer/perforation were significantly associated with post‐ESD fever. In PECS, IM group, tumors located on the right side, treatment time ≥60 min, injury to the muscle layer, and multiple lesions were independent risk factors. Both post‐ESD fever and PECS improved conservatively in the IM group, and no serious complication was observed.

Conclusions

The use of IM was a risk factor for both post‐ESD fever and PECS. However, there were no serious complications in colorectal ESD for patients taking IM.

The Endoscopy Patient as a Vector and Victim

Patient and procedural factors can increase the risk of infectious adverse events during endoscopy. Prophylactic antibiotic use must be judicious and individualized in the era of antibiotic resistance. New and emerging procedures require high-quality studies to elucidate appropriate risk profiles.

The Biology of Anastomotic Healing-the Unknown Overwhelms the Known

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic complications are among the most devastating consequences of gastrointestinal surgery. Despite its high morbidity, the factors responsible for anastomotic regeneration following surgical construction remain poorly understood. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the typical and atypical factors that have been implicated in anastomotic healing.

METHODS

A review and analysis of select literature on anastomotic healing was performed.

RESULTS

The healing of an anastomotic wound mirrors the phases of cutaneous wound healing- inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. The evidence supporting much of the traditional dogma for optimal anastomotic healing (ischemia, tension, nutrition) is sparse. More recent research has implicated atypical factors that influence anastomotic healing, including the microbiome, the mesentery, and geometry. As technology evolves, endoscopic approaches may improve anastomotic healing and in some cases may eliminate the anastomosis altogether.

DISCUSSION

Much remains unknown regarding the mechanisms of anastomotic healing, and research should focus on elucidating the dynamics of healing at a molecular level. Doing so may help facilitate the transition from traditional surgical dogma to evidence-based medicine in the operating room.

Pyogenic Liver Abscess Caused by Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Colon Cancer

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely used for the treatment of colorectal neoplasia in patients who are candidates for endoscopic resection. In particular, pyogenic liver abscess (PLA), although rare, can occur. To our knowledge, there are no reports of PLA cases after ESD. Therefore, we report a rare case of PLA caused by ESD. A 76-year-old man was referred from a local clinic and admitted to our hospital for colonic ESD for a large polypoid mass. During colonoscopy, a 5-cm mass was seen in the cecum. ESD was performed. Four days after the procedure, he complained of myalgia and abdominal discomfort. Computed tomography revealed a 5.4-cm PLA in the medial segments of the liver. He was treated with antibiotics, and a percutaneous drainage catheter was inserted. Here, we report a very rare complication (PLA) after ESD. In conclusion, comprehensive awareness of the development of PLA is needed in ESD cases.

Utility of multi-detector computed tomography scans after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Several reports have described major adverse events after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), such as perforation or bleeding. However, few studies have discussed the occurrence of post-ESD electrocoagulation syndrome (PEECS) after colorectal ESD. In addition, the occurrence of fever without abdominal pain in patients requires postoperative management similar to that required for PEECS. Therefore, we have defined post-ESD inflammatory syndrome (PEIS) composed of both PEECS and fever without abdominal pain. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between the findings of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) imaging and PEIS in patients.

METHODS

Between January 2015 and October 2015, we performed colorectal ESD in 100 patients; after this, all patients underwent abdominal examinations by MDCT scans. Nine patients who experienced intraoperative perforations or penetrations were excluded; 91 patients were enrolled in our prospective study. MDCT findings in patients were classified according to the amount of extraluminal gas. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of extraluminal gas and were assessed for co-occurring PEIS.

RESULTS

Among the 91 patients, extraluminal gas was observed in 31 (34%); of these, PEIS occurred in 14 (15%) patients. Patients with extraluminal gas had increased incidence of PEIS compared with patients without extraluminal gas (29% vs 8%, P = .014).

CONCLUSIONS

Extraluminal gas was detected by MDCT in many cases and significantly correlated with the occurrence of PEIS, even in cases without obvious intraoperative perforation or penetration. MDCT findings after ESD may be useful for predicting PEIS and appropriate perioperative management.

A randomized controlled trial of prophylactic antibiotics in the prevention of electrocoagulation syndrome after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is currently commonly performed, but colorectal ESD has a substantial risk of adverse events, including post-ESD electrocoagulation syndrome (PEECS). We investigated whether the use of prophylactic antibiotics can reduce the occurrence of PEECS.

METHODS

Patients who underwent colorectal ESD were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment regimens. Ampicillin and/or sulbactam mixed with normal saline solution was administered 1 hour before ESD in group 1 then additionally injected every 8 hours twice more. In group 2, normal saline solution without antibiotics was administered following the same schedule. We investigated the characteristics of the patients and tumors, the incidence of PEECS, laboratory findings, and the visual analog scale (VAS) score for abdominal pain measured on the morning after ESD.

RESULTS

A total of 100 cases (50 per group) were finally analyzed, and 97 tumors were successfully resected en bloc. The number of patients having C-reactive protein (CRP) levels ≥1 mg/dL and the number of patients having VAS scores for abdominal pain ≥1 were greater in group 2 than in group 1 (P = .008 and .023, respectively). The incidence of PEECS in group 2 also was higher than that in group 1 (1 and 8 in groups 1 and 2, respectively; P = .031).

CONCLUSIONS

The prophylactic use of ampicillin and/or sulbactam in colorectal ESD is associated with reduced risk of PEECS, decreased CRP levels, and decreased abdominal pain. The use of prophylactic antibiotics in colorectal ESD may be an effective tool for reducing the risk of PEECS. (Clinical trial registration number: KCT0001102.).

The low incidence of bacteremia after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) obviates the need for prophylactic antibiotics in esophageal ESD

BACKGROUND

Although a high incidence of bacteremia after esophageal endoscopic procedures has been reported, the incidence of bacteremia associated with esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) remains unknown. Therefore, we investigated the incidence of bacteremia associated with esophageal ESD.

METHODS

From April 2013 to March 2014, patients who underwent esophageal ESD were enrolled prospectively. Two sets of blood cultures were collected from patients at the following time points: (1) immediately after ESD; (2) the next morning; and (3) when fever ≥38 °C was present after ESD.

RESULTS

A total of 424 blood culture sets were collected from 101 patients. Six patients had positive blood cultures immediately after ESD (4 %, 7/202 sets). Another patient had a positive blood culture the next morning (0.5 %, 1/202 sets). Ten patients (10 %) developed a post-ESD fever ≥38 °C, and blood cultures from these patients were all negative (0/20 sets). The seven patients with positive blood cultures had no post-ESD fever or infectious symptoms. Growth of Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron was only observed in one patient (1 %) with positive blood cultures immediately after ESD, and this patient was diagnosed with transient bacteremia. The other six patients were considered to have contaminants in their blood cultures. Thus, the incidence of bacteremia after esophageal ESD was 1 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0-5 %]. No patient had infectious symptoms, and none required antibiotics after ESD.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of bacteremia after esophageal ESD was low and post-ESD fever was not associated with bacteremia. We conclude that use of routine prophylactic antibiotics to patients undergoing esophageal ESD is unnecessary.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER

UMIN000012908.

Features of electrocoagulation syndrome after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasm

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a promising treatment for large gastrointestinal superficial neoplasms, although it is technically difficult, and perforation and delayed bleeding are well-known adverse events. However, there have been no large studies about electrocoagulation syndrome after colorectal ESD. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and clinical significant risk factors of post-ESD coagulation syndrome (PECS).

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a referral cancer center. A total of 336 patients with colorectal neoplasms (143 adenomas or serrated lesions and 193 carcinomas) underwent ESD from January 2011 to June 2013. Incidence, outcome, and factors associated with occurrence of PECS were investigated.

RESULTS

Occurred in 32 patients (9.5%). The median time until PECS was 15.5 h, and the median period of PECS was 32.5 h. Fever (≥37.6 °C) after ESD was found in 41% of the PECS group and 9% of the non-PECS group (P < 0.001). All PECS cases were managed conservatively. On multivariate analysis, female patients (odds ratio [OR] = 3.2, P = 0.002), lesion location at ascending colon and cecum (OR = 3.5, P = 0.001), and resected specimen ≥40 mm (OR = 2.1, P = 0.05) were independent risk factors for PECS.

CONCLUSIONS

Occurred in 32 patients (9.5%) with colorectal ESD; however, all cases had a good outcome with conservative management. Female sex, tumor location at the ascending colon and cecum, and resected specimen ≥40 mm were independently significant risk factors for PECS.

Coagulation syndrome: Delayed perforation after colorectal endoscopic treatments

Various procedure-related adverse events related to colonoscopic treatment have been reported. Previous studies on the complications of colonoscopic treatment have focused primarily on perforation or bleeding. Coagulation syndrome (CS), which is synonymous with transmural burn syndrome following endoscopic treatment, is another typical adverse event. CS is the result of electrocoagulation injury to the bowel wall that induces a transmural burn and localized peritonitis resulting in serosal inflammation. CS occurs after polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), and even endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The occurrence of CS after polypectomy or EMR varies according previous reports; most report an occurrence rate around 1%. However, artificial ulcers after ESD are largely theoretical, and CS following ESD was reported in about 9% of cases, which is higher than that for CS after polypectomy or EMR. Most cases of post-polypectomy syndrome (PPS) have an excellent prognosis, and they are managed conservatively with medical therapy. PPS rarely develops into delayed perforation. Delayed perforation is a severe adverse event that often requires emergency surgery. Since few studies have reported on CS and delayed perforation associated with CS, we focused on CS after colonoscopic treatments in this review. Clinicians should consider delayed perforation in CS patients.

Post-operative infection of endoscopic submucosal dissection of early colorectal neoplasms: a case-controlled study using a Japanese database

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early colorectal neoplasms (ESD-ECN) is known to be an operation with risk of contamination, possibly requiring pre-operative antimicrobial prophylaxis for the prevention of post-operative infection. However, an evaluation of the need for pre-operative antimicrobial prophylaxis for ESD-ECN has yet to be reported. The objective of this study was to determine whether pre-operative antimicrobial prophylaxis is associated with a reduced incidence of post-operative infection following ESD-ECN.

METHODS

The present retrospective case-controlled study utilized a database built from the medical records of 14 university hospitals throughout Japan. Patients who were admitted and discharged from the hospital from April 2012 to October 2013 and who had undergone ESD-ECN were included in the study. Patients who had been undergone any other operation during their course of hospitalization, and patients who were prescribed antimicrobial agents for reasons other than post-operative infection or for prophylaxis were excluded. Characteristics of the study population, pre-operative antimicrobial prophylaxis and antimicrobial therapy for post-operative infection were investigated. In addition, we compared the characteristics of patients with post-operative infection (PI) and those with no post-operative infection (NPI). Univariate analyses were used to estimate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

We obtained the records of 522 patients who had undergone ESD-ECN from the database. After application of exclusion criteria, 421 patients were enrolled. The post-operative infection rate was 1·2%. Peritonitis was found most to be the most common post-operative infection (44%). Pre-operative antimicrobial prophylaxis was used for 314 patients (75%), with a median duration of 3·0 (range 1-11) days. Cefotiam was most frequently prescribed for pre-operative antimicrobial prophylaxis (56%). Antimicrobial therapies were started 1-10 days after ESD-ECN for a duration of 1-14 days. Pre-operative antimicrobial prophylaxis was not associated with post-operative infection rate, with an OR (95% CI) of 0·73 (0·08-6·61). However, digestive tract perforation was shown to be associated with post-operative infection and had an OR (95% CI) of 17·1 (1·66-176·45).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Post-operative infection is an exceedingly rare event following ESD-ECN. Pre-operative antimicrobial prophylaxis had no significant effect on post-operative infection following ESD-ECN and thus may be unnecessary. Instead, prevention of digestive tract perforation may be more critical for the decrease in post-operative infections.

Bacteremia after Endoscopic Submucosal Excavation for Treating the Gastric Muscular Layer Tumors

Background. The bacteremia is reported as being infrequent and transient in gastric EMR and ESD for treating gastric mucosa lesions or superficial gastric neoplastic lesion. There was no report of it being investigated in ESD for treating gastric muscular layer tumors (endoscopic submucosal excavation, ESE). This study aimed to determine the frequency of bacteremia in gastric ESE. Patients and Methods. A prospective study, in 122 consecutive patients who underwent gastric ESE for treating gastric muscular layer tumors, investigated the frequency of bacteremia before and 15 minutes after the procedure. Results. The median time for the total ESE procedure was 29 min (range from 8 to 62 min). The mean size of the biggest diameter of each resected specimen was 10 ± 2.7 mm (range from 5 mm to 30 mm). Blood cultures obtained before ESE were positive in 0% (0/122) of cases. Blood cultures obtained 15 min after ESE were positive in 2.5% (3/122) of cases. Six blood samples contained Staphylococcus with coagulase negative, which was considered contaminant. No signs of sepsis were seen in all patients. Conclusions. The frequency of bacteremia after gastric ESE was low. ESE for treating gastric lesions is thought to have a low risk of infectious complications; therefore, prophylactic administration of antibiotics may not be warranted.

Postpolypectomy Fever, a rare adverse event of polypectomy: nested case-control study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Although postpolypectomy fever (PPF) without colon perforation or hemorrhage is rare, its incidence and risk factors have not been investigated. The objective of this study was to analyze the incidence and risk factors for PPF among inpatients.

METHODS

Seven patients with PPF were matched with 70 patients without PPF from a total of 3,444 patients who underwent colonoscopic polypectomy. The PPF incidence during index hospitalization after colonoscopy was calculated, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to calculate the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for risk factors.

RESULTS

PPF without bleeding or perforation in the colon occurred in seven patients (0.2%). The median age was 58 years for cases and 61 years for controls. The median interval from polypectomy to occurrence of fever was 7 hours, and the median duration of fever was 9 hours. Polyp size >2 cm (adjusted OR, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 1.15; p=0.02) and hypertension (adjusted OR, 14.40; 95% CI, 1.23 to 180.87; p=0.03) were associated with a significantly increased risk of PPF. PPF increased the length of hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the crude incidence of PPF is low, PPF may prolong hospitalization. Risk factors for PPF include hypertension and large polyps.

Frequent occurrence of fever in patients who have undergone endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumor, but bacteremia is not a significant cause

BACKGROUND

We examined the incidence of and factors associated with fever, as well as the frequency of bacteremia, in patients who had undergone endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal tumor.

METHOD

A total of 199 patients (120 male and 79 female) were included. The patients were classified into two groups based on the body temperature on the day after ESD treatment: group A, body temperature <37 °C; and group B, body temperature ≥37 °C. The following factors were analyzed to determine their potential association with post-ESD fever: gender, age, tumor size, form, location, and presence or absence of intraoperative perforation. In addition, blood samples from 50 patients were obtained for blood culture and 16S rRNA gene analysis by polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

Group A included 106 patients (70 male and 36 female), with a median age of 63 years. Group B included 93 patients (50 male and 43 female), with a median age of 70 years. The incidence of post-ESD fever in the entire cohort was 46.7%. Univariate analysis based on comparison between groups A and B showed that the following factors were significantly associated with post-ESD fever: age [mean ± standard deviation (SD)], 64.5 ± 9.2 versus 68.5 ± 10.8 years, P = 0.006; and tumor size (mean ± SD) 30.6 ± 10.8 versus 39.1 ± 16.6 mm, P < 0.001. Logistic regression analysis for post-ESD fever also found that age {odds ratio 1.04 (95% CI [1.01-1.07], P = 0.009)} and lesion size {odds ratio 1.05 (95% CI [1.03-1.08], P = 0.0002)} were closely associated with post-ESD fever. Of the 50 patients who had blood samples cultured and 16S rRNA gene analyzed, bacteria in blood culture and the 16S rRNA gene were not detectable in any of the samples from the 50 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicated that older patients and patients with large tumors were more likely to develop post-ESD fever, but there was a low probability that bacteremia was the cause of fever.

Advanced mucosal neoplasia of the anorectal junction: endoscopic resection technique and outcomes (with videos)

BACKGROUND

EMR at the anorectal junction (ARJ) is technically challenging. Issues of safety and procedural efficacy dictate that surgery is still performed as the primary management for noninvasive lesions in most centers. Modifications to the standard EMR technique may help to address the unique features and achieve safe and curative resection of most lesions.

OBJECTIVE

To describe an effective and safe, modified EMR technique to remove advanced mucosal neoplasia (AMN) of the ARJ.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational cohort study.

SETTING

Academic, tertiary care referral center.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing EMR for AMN at the ARJ over 4.5 years, from June 2008 to December 2012.

INTERVENTIONS

Use of long-acting local anesthetic in the submucosal injectate, endoscopic resection over the dentate line and hemorrhoidal columns, prophylactic antibiotics for resection of lesions at high risk for bacteremia, and cap and gastroscope-assisted resection.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Procedural success and safety.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients with lesions involving the ARJ were referred for EMR (males 53.8%, median age 63, median lesion size 40 mm). Two patients went directly to surgery because of an endoscopic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. EMR was performed in 24 lesions with complete adenoma clearance achieved in 100%. Four patients were admitted to the hospital. Focal adenoma recurrence was seen in 4 of 18 patients (22%) at first surveillance colonoscopy and was managed by snare diathermy resection. No recurrences were found at the second follow-up colonoscopy. Procedural success, adenoma recurrence, and admission rates were similar between EMRs performed at the ARJ and proximal rectum on univariate analysis (all P > .05).

LIMITATIONS

Single tertiary center, nonrandomized study.

CONCLUSIONS

Simple modifications to the EMR technique allow safe and effective treatment of AMN at the ARJ on an outpatient basis and should be the first-line management when the risk of invasive disease is low.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for removal of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms: A technical review

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is now the most common endoscopic treatment in Japan for intramucosal gastrointestinal neoplasms (non-metastatic). ESD is an invasive endoscopic surgical procedure, requiring extensive knowledge, skill, and specialized equipment. ESD starts with evaluation of the lesion, as accurate assessment of the depth and margin of the lesion is essential. The devices and strategies used in ESD vary, depending on the nature of the lesion. Prior to the procedure, the operator must be knowledgeable about the treatment strategy(ies), the device(s) to use, the electrocautery machine settings, the substances to inject, and other aspects. In addition, the operator must be able to manage complications, should they arise, including immediate recognition of the complication(s) and its treatment. Finally, in case the ESD treatment is not successful, the operator should be prepared to apply alternative treatments. Thus, adequate knowledge and training are essential to successfully perform ESD.

[Endoscopic submucosal dissection: only for expert endoscopists?]

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can be applied to early gastrointestinal cancers. This technique was developed to achieve radical curative resection and to reduce unnecessary surgical interventions. ESD was designed in eastern countries and is not widely used in the West. Although ESD represents a major therapeutic advance in endoscopy and is performed with curative intent, the complication rate (hemorrhage, perforation) is higher than reported in other techniques, requiring from endoscopists the acquirement of technical skill and experience through a structured and progressive training program to reduce the morbidity associated with this technique and increase its potential benefits. Although there is substantial published evidence on the applications and results of ESD, there are few publications on training in this technique and a standardized training program is lacking. The current article aims to describe the various proposals for training, as well as the basic principles of the technique, its indications, and the results obtained, since theoretical knowledge that would guide endoscopists during the clinical application of ESD is advisable before training begins. Training in an endoscopic technique has a little value without knowledge of the technique's aims, the situations in which it should be applied, and the results that can be expected.

The feasibility and safety of the endoscopic submucosal dissection of superficial gastric neoplastic lesions in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis: a retrospective study

Background/Aims

When undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) may suffer from a high risk of bleeding, bacteremia and tissue vulnerability. There have been few reports evaluating the efficacy and safety of ESD in patients with LC.

Methods

From January 2004 to March 2010, 23 patients with LC (cirrhosis group) underwent ESD for superficial gastric neoplastic lesions. The number of patients with a liver function in the Child-Pugh classes A and B were 20 and 3, respectively. The clinical outcomes and complications were compared with 69 patients without LC (control group) that were matched for age and sex.

Results

The en bloc resection, R0 resection and en bloc plus R0 resection rates of the cirrhosis group were 82.6%, 91.3%, and 82.6%, respectively, and did not show significant differences from the rates of the control group. No local recurrence was found in either group during the follow-up period. The procedure length of time (41.0 vs 39.0 minutes), rate of bleeding (4.3% vs 7.2%) and rate of perforation (0.0% vs 1.4%) in the cirrhosis group were also comparable to the results from the control group.

Conclusions

ESD was safely performed in patients with LC, and satisfactory outcomes were achieved with high en bloc and R0 resection rates for superficial gastric neoplastic lesions.

Bacteremia and endotoxemia after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasia: pilot study

BACKGROUND

Because the invasive procedure of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) entails a large mucosal defect which is left open, with extensive submucosal exposure to the indigenous bacterial flora, the procedure may have a substantial risk for bacteremia. Our aim was to examine gastric ESD-related bacteremia and endotoxemia in gastric neoplasia patients.

METHODS

In patients who underwent ESD for superficial gastric neoplasia, blood cultures and plasma endotoxin measurements were done before, immediately after, and on day 2 after ESD. Clinically manifest infections and inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cells, were monitored.

RESULTS

Fifty patients (aged 69 ± 8 years; mean ± SD) were enrolled. The diameter of the resected specimens was 38 ± 18 mm and the procedure time of ESD was 66 ± 53 min. Two percent (2/100) of blood cultures after ESD were positive, with findings as follows: Propionibacterium species immediately after ESD, and Enterobacter aerogenes on day 2 after ESD, but no clinically manifest infection was observed. In 30% of the enrolled patients, CRP on day 2 after ESD had increased to levels higher than 1.0 mg/l. Plasma endotoxin levels, immediately after and on day 2 after ESD were correlated with CRP levels on day 2 after ESD.

CONCLUSIONS

In spite of the invasive procedure with massive submucosal exposure to the indigenous bacterial flora, gastric ESD has a low risk for bacteremia. Gastric ESD-related endotoxemia may be linked to inflammatory reactions such as those shown by the increase of CRP or fever observed after ESD.

Low-frequency of bacteremia after endoscopic submucosal dissection of the stomach

BACKGROUND

Mainstream therapy for early gastric cancer in Japan has now shifted from endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) to endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Although bacteremia is reported as being infrequent and transient in gastric EMR, there are no reports of it being investigated in gastric ESD. This study aimed to determine the frequency of bacteremia in gastric ESD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective study, in 46 consecutive patients who underwent gastric ESD, investigated the frequency of bacteremia before and after the procedure.

RESULTS

  The median time for the total ESD procedure was 105min (range 30-400). The median volume of the submucosal injection was 80ml (range 20-260). The mean size of the resected specimen was 40±9.7mm. Blood cultures obtained before ESD were positive in 4.4% (2/45) of cases. Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus spp. were the isolated microorganisms. Blood cultures obtained 10min after ESD were positive in 4.3% (2/46) of cases; with the same microorganisms being isolated. Blood cultures obtained 3h after ESD were all negative. No signs of sepsis were seen in the two patients with a positive blood culture 10min after ESD.

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of bacteremia after gastric ESD was low and transient. ESD for gastric lesions is thought to have a low risk of infectious complications; therefore, prophylactic administration of antibiotics may not be warranted.