Case report of a hemostatic clip being retained for 2 years after deployment

The risk factors for prolonged hemostatic clip retention after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasm

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic hemostatic clipping is a safe and efficient treatment used to manage bleeding or perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric neoplasm. However, the natural history of applied hemoclips during ESD has not been elucidated. As prolonged clip retention limits the use of magnetic resonance imaging and may impede the ulcer healing process, we investigated the factors associated with prolonged hemoclip retention during gastric ESD.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 199 patients who underwent gastric ESD with hemoclip application from January 2006 to January 2019. The primary outcome was the prolonged hemoclip retention rate 3 months after ESD. We examined the records of subjects followed at 3, 6, and 12 months and then annually after ESD to monitor clip retention.

RESULTS

The prolonged hemoclip retention rate at 3 months was 27.1% (54/199). The risk of hemoclip retention was significantly lower at the antrum (19.6%, P = 0.03). Hemoclips at the angle tended to remain longer than other locations in the stomach (40.6%, P = 0.081) while there was no difference in the number of applied clips depending upon the location of the lesion. By Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, clips at the antrum detached significantly earlier than those at other locations (P = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the hemostatic clips attached during ESD were spontaneously removed by 3 months after gastric ESD. However, clips positioned at angle are suspected to have a high probability of prolonged retention. With this in mind, more attention is needed when using hemoclips on angle.

Biomaterials in Gastroenterology: A Critical Overview

In spite of the large diversity of diagnostic and interventional devices associated with gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures, there is little information on the impact of the biomaterials (metals, polymers) contained in these devices upon body tissues and, indirectly, upon the treatment outcomes. Other biomaterials for gastroenterology, such as adhesives and certain hemostatic agents, have been investigated to a greater extent, but the information is fragmentary. Much of this situation is due to the paucity of details disclosed by the manufacturers of the devices. Moreover, for most of the applications in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, there are no studies available on the biocompatibility of the device materials when in intimate contact with mucosae and other components of the GI tract. We have summarized the current situation with a focus on aspects of biomaterials and biocompatibility related to the device materials and other agents, with an emphasis on the GI endoscopic procedures. Procedures and devices used for the control of bleeding, for polypectomy, in bariatrics, and for stenting are discussed, particularly dwelling upon the biomaterial-related features of each application. There are indications that research is progressing steadily in this field, and the establishment of the subdiscipline of "gastroenterologic biomaterials" is not merely a remote projection. Upon the completion of this article, the gastroenterologist should be able to understand the nature of biomaterials and to achieve a suitable and beneficial perception of their significance in gastroenterology. Likewise, the biomaterialist should become aware of the specific tasks that the biomaterials must fulfil when placed within the GI tract, and regard such applications as both a challenge and an incentive for progressing the research in this field.

Mechanical Hemostasis Techniques in Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

One of the most important advances in gastroenterology has been the use of endoscopic hemostasis techniques to control nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding, particularly when high-risk stigmata are present. Several options are available, including injection therapy, sprays/topical agents, electrocautery, and mechanical methods. The method chosen depends on the nature of the lesion and experience of the endoscopist. This article reviews the available mechanical hemostatic modalities.