A morphologic analysis of sessile serrated polyps observed during routine colonoscopy (with video)

Usefulness of magnifying endoscopy for diagnosis of sessile serrated lesion with dysplasia or carcinoma: Large retrospective study

Background and study aims Sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) are precursor lesions in the serrated neoplasia pathway that lead to invasive carcinoma from dysplasia arising from SSLs. This study aimed to elucidate the clinicopathological and endoscopic features of SSLs with and without dysplasia or carcinoma. Patients and methods We reviewed the clinicopathological and endoscopic data from all colorectal lesions pathologically diagnosed as SSLs at Juntendo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, between 2011 and 2022. In addition to conventional endoscopic findings, we retrospectively evaluated magnifying endoscopic findings with narrow-band imaging (NBI) or blue laser imaging (BLI) using the Japan NBI Expert Team system and analyzed pit patterns using magnified chromoendoscopic images. Results Of the 2,132 SSLs, 92.5%, 4.7%, 1.8%, and 0.9% had no dysplasia, low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia, and submucosal invasive carcinoma, respectively. Older age, the proximal colon, and larger lesions were more frequently associated with SSLs with dysplasia or carcinoma. However, 41.3% of the SSLs with dysplasia or carcinoma were ≤ 10 mm in size. Endoscopic findings, such as (semi)pedunculated morphology, double elevation, central depression, and reddishness, were frequently found in SSLs with dysplasia or carcinoma. Furthermore, magnifying endoscopy using NBI or BLI and magnifying chromoendoscopy showed high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for diagnosing dysplasia or carcinoma within SSLs. Conclusions SSLs with and without dysplasia or carcinoma exhibit distinct clinicopathological and endoscopic features. In an SSL series, conventional endoscopic characteristics in addition to use of magnifying endoscopy may be useful for accurately diagnosing advanced histology within an SSL.

Leveraging a realistic synthetic database to learn Shape-from-Shading for estimating the colon depth in colonoscopy images

Colonoscopy is the choice procedure to diagnose, screening, and treat the colon and rectum cancer, from early detection of small precancerous lesions (polyps), to confirmation of malign masses. However, the high variability of the organ appearance and the complex shape of both the colon wall and structures of interest make this exploration difficult. Learned visuospatial and perceptual abilities mitigate technical limitations in clinical practice by proper estimation of the intestinal depth. This work introduces a novel methodology to estimate colon depth maps in single frames from monocular colonoscopy videos. The generated depth map is inferred from the shading variation of the colon wall with respect to the light source, as learned from a realistic synthetic database. Briefly, a classic convolutional neural network architecture is trained from scratch to estimate the depth map, improving sharp depth estimations in haustral folds and polyps by a custom loss function that minimizes the estimation error in edges and curvatures. The network was trained by a custom synthetic colonoscopy database herein constructed and released, composed of 248400 frames (47 videos), with depth annotations at the level of pixels. This collection comprehends 5 subsets of videos with progressively higher levels of visual complexity. Evaluation of the depth estimation with the synthetic database reached a threshold accuracy of 95.65%, and a mean-RMSE of 0.451cm, while a qualitative assessment with a real database showed consistent depth estimations, visually evaluated by the expert gastroenterologist coauthoring this paper. Finally, the method achieved competitive performance with respect to another state-of-the-art method using a public synthetic database and comparable results in a set of images with other five state-of-the-art methods. Additionally, three-dimensional reconstructions demonstrated useful approximations of the gastrointestinal tract geometry. Code for reproducing the reported results and the dataset are available at https://github.com/Cimalab-unal/ColonDepthEstimation.

Clinical and endoscopic characteristics of colorectal sessile serrated lesions with or without dysplasia/carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare the clinical and endoscopic characteristics of sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) with dysplasia/carcinoma (SSLD/Cs) and SSLs without dysplasia in this systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for relevant studies published up to August 28, 2023. The primary outcome was lesion size in SSLD/Cs and SSLs without dysplasia. The secondary outcomes included risk of dysplasia/carcinoma, morphology (classified based on the Paris classification), and lesion features such as mucus cap and nodules/protrusions in the two groups.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies with 14 381 patients were included. The proportion of SSLD/Cs ≥10 mm was significantly higher than that of SSLs without dysplasia (odds ratio [OR] 3.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21-12.02, p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the risk of dysplasia/carcinoma between the proximal (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.57-1.14) and distal colon (OR 1.25, 95% CI 0.88-1.77, p = 0.21). The 0-Ip (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.50-4.09) and 0-IIa + Is (OR 10.38, 95% CI 3.08-34.98) morphologies were more prevalent among SSLD/Cs, whereas the 0-IIa morphology (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.22-0.65) was more prevalent among SSLs without dysplasia (all p < 0.001). Furthermore, mucus cap (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.42-0.89, p = 0.01) was more common among SSLs without dysplasia, whereas nodules/protrusions (OR 7.80, 95% CI 3.07-19.85, p < 0.001) were more common in SSLD/Cs.

CONCLUSION

SSLs >10 mm, 0-Ip or 0-IIa + Is morphologies, and those with nodules/protrusions are significantly associated with dysplasia/carcinoma.

Endoscopic characteristics and performance of WASP classification in the diagnosis of colorectal sessile-serrated lesions in Vietnamese patients

Background/Aims

Sessile-serrated lesions (SSLs) are challenging to detect due to their typically subtle appearance. The Workgroup serrAted polypS and Polyposis (WASP) classification was developed to diagnose SSLs endoscopically. This study aimed to evaluate the endoscopic characteristics of SSLs and the performance of the WASP classification in the Vietnamese population.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was carried out on patients with lower gastrointestinal symptoms who underwent colonoscopy at a Vietnamese tertiary hospital. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify endoscopic features associated with SSLs. The performance of the WASP classification for diagnosing SSLs was assessed, and SSLs were diagnosed according to the 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) criteria.

Results

There were 2489 patients, with a mean age of 52.1 ± 13.1 years and a female-to-male ratio of 1:1.1. A total of 121 specimens from 105 patients were diagnosed with SSLs. According to multivariate analysis, the endoscopic features significantly associated with SSLs were proximal location (odds ratio [OR]: 2.351; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.475-3.746), size >5 mm (OR: 2.447; 95% CI: 1.551-3.862), flat morphology (OR: 2.781; 95% CI: 1.533-5.044), irregular shape (OR: 4.516; 95% CI: 2.173-9.388), varicose microvascular vessels (OR: 5.030; 95% CI: 2.657-9.522), and dark spots inside the crypts (OR: 5.955; 95% CI: 3.291-10.776). The accuracy of the WASP classification for diagnosing SSLs was 94.0% (95% CI: 92.8%-95.0%).

Conclusion

Proximal location, size >5 mm, flat morphology, irregular shape, varicose microvascular vessels, and dark spots inside the crypts were significantly associated with SSLs. The WASP classification had high accuracy in the diagnosis of SSLs.

Sporadic Polyps of the Colorectum

Colorectal polyps are common, and their diagnosis and classification represent a major component of gastrointestinal pathology practice. The majority of colorectal polyps represent precursors of either the chromosomal instability or serrated neoplasia pathways to colorectal carcinoma. Accurate reporting of these polyps has major implications for surveillance and thus for cancer prevention. In this review, we discuss the key histologic features of the major colorectal polyps with a particular emphasis on diagnostic pitfalls and areas of contention.

Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (uEMR) without submucosal injection for sessile colorectal polyps was introduced as a new replacement for conventional EMR (cEMR). However, the optimal resection strategy remains a topic of debate. Hence, this meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of uEMR and cEMR in patients with sessile colorectal polyps.

METHODS

a comprehensive search of the literature from 2000 till January 2022 was performed from Medline, CENTRAL and Embase for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing cEMR vs uEMR for colorectal polyps. The evaluated outcomes included en bloc resection, R0 resection, procedure time, overall bleeding and recurrence. Pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95 % confidence interval were calculated using a random effect model.

RESULTS

six studies were included, out of which four were full-text articles and two were conference abstracts. En bloc resection (RR 1.26, 95 % CI: 1.00-1.60), R0 resection (RR 1.10, 95 % CI: 0.96-1.26), overall bleeding (RR 0.85, 95 % CI: 0.54-1.34) and recurrence rate (RR 0.75, 95 % CI: 0.45-1.27) were comparable between uEMR and cEMR. However, uEMR was associated with a shorter procedure time (mean difference [MD] -1.55 minutes, 95 % CI: -2.71 to -0.39). According to the subgroup analysis, uEMR led to a higher rate of en bloc resection (RR 1.41, 95 % CI: 1.07-1.86) and R0 resection (RR 1.19, 95 % CI: 1.01-1.41) for polyps ≥ 10 mm in size.

CONCLUSION

both uEMR and cEMR have a comparable safety and efficacy. For polyps larger than 10 mm, uEMR may have an advantage over cEMR and should be the topic for future studies.

Current progress on the endoscopic features of colorectal sessile serrated lesions

Along with the discovery and refinement of serrated pathways, the World Health Organization amended the classification of digestive system tumors in 2019, recommending the renaming of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps to sessile serrated lesions (SSLs). Given the particularity of the endoscopic appearance of SSLs, it could easily be overlooked and missed in colonoscopy screening, which is crucial for the occurrence of interval colorectal cancer. Existing literature has found that adequate bowel preparation, reasonable withdrawal time, and awareness of colorectal SSLs have improved the quality and accuracy of detection. More particularly, with the continuous advancement and development of endoscopy technology, equipment, and accessories, a potent auxiliary tool is provided for accurate observation and immediate diagnosis of SSLs. High-definition white light endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and magnifying endoscopy have distinct roles in the detection of colorectal SSLs and are valuable in identifying the size, shape, character, risk degree, and potential malignant tendency. This article delves into the relevant factors influencing the detection rate of colorectal SSLs, reviews its characteristics under various endoscopic techniques, and expects to attract the attention of colonoscopists.

Colorectal sessile serrated lesion detection using linked-color imaging versus narrow-band imaging: a parallel randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

 Previous studies have reported the effectiveness of narrow-band imaging (NBI) and linked-color imaging (LCI) in improving the detection of colorectal neoplasms. There has however been no direct comparison between LCI and NBI in the detection of colorectal sessile serrated lesions (SSLs). The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of LCI and NBI in detecting colorectal SSLs.

METHODS

 A prospective, parallel, randomized controlled trial was conducted. The participants were randomly assigned to the LCI or NBI arms. The primary end point was the SSL detection rate (SDR).

RESULTS

 406 patients were involved; 204 in the LCI arm and 202 in the NBI arm. The total polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and SDR were 54.2 %, 38.7 %, and 10.8%, respectively. The SDR was not significantly different between the LCI and NBI arms (12.3 % vs. 9.4 %; P = 0.36). The differences in the detection rate and the per-patient number of polyps, adenomas, diminutive lesions, and flat lesions between LCI and NBI also were not statistically significant. Multivariate analysis showed that LCI and NBI were not independent factors associated with SDR, whereas Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score (odds ratio [OR] 1.35, 95 %CI 1.03-1.76; P = 0.03), withdrawal time (OR 1.13, 95 %CI 1.00-1.26; P = 0.04), and operator experience (OR 3.73, 95 %CI 1.67-8.32; P = 0.001) were independent factors associated with SDR.

CONCLUSIONS

 LCI and NBI are comparable for SSL detection, as well as for the detection of polyps and adenomas.

Accuracy and Inter-observer Agreement Among Endoscopists for Visual Identification of Colorectal Polyps Using Endoscopy Images

BACKGROUND

It is essential to accurately distinguish small benign hyperplastic colon polyps (HP) from sessile serrated lesions (SSL) or adenomatous polyps (TA) based on endoscopic appearances. Our objective was to determine the accuracy and inter-observer agreements for the endoscopic diagnosis of small polyps.

METHODS

High-quality endoscopic images of 30 small HPs, SSLs, and TAs were used randomly to create two-timed PowerPoint slide sets-one with and another one without information on polyp size and location. Seven endoscopists viewed the slides on two separate occasions 90 days apart, identified the polyp type, and graded their confidence level. Overall and polyp-specific accuracies were assessed for the group and individual endoscopists. Chi-square tests and Kappa (κ) statistics were used to compare differences as appropriate.

RESULTS

When polyp size and location were provided, overall accuracy was 67.1% for TAs, 50.0% for SSLs, and 41.4% for HPs; the corresponding accuracies were 60%, 44.3%, and 34.3% when polyp size and location were withheld (p < .001). Inter-observer agreement was moderate for TAs (κ = 0.50) and fair for SSLs (κ = 0.26) and HPs (κ = 0.29); the corresponding inter-observer agreements were 0.44, 0.31, and 0.17 with polyp size and location withheld. Accuracy was not affected by knowledge of polyp size, location, or confidence level. Endoscopists with ≥ 10 years (vs. < 10 years) of colonoscopy experience had marginally higher (56% vs. 40%, p = 0.05) accuracy for SSL diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The ability to distinguish between small TAs, SSLs, and HPs on their endoscopic appearance is poor regardless of the endoscopists' knowledge of polyp size and location.

Usefulness of Acetic Acid Spray with Narrow-Band Imaging for Identifying the Margin of Sessile Serrated Lesions

BACKGROUND

Sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) are precursors of colon cancer, especially in cases of large, right colon. However, they are difficult to not only detect, but only clarify the margin of the lesion, which can lead to the poor endoscopic treatment outcomes.

AIMS

This study evaluated the usefulness of acetic acid spray with narrow-band imaging (A-NBI) for the better visualization of the margin of SSLs.

METHODS

From January 2013 to March 2022, patients with superficial elevated polyps suspected of being SSLs ≥ 10 mm with an endoscopic diagnosis that had been endoscopically resected at Hiroshima City Hiroshima Citizens Hospital were enrolled. Endoscopic images with white-light imaging (WLI), narrow-band imaging (NBI), indigo-carmine (IC), and A-NBI were recorded in each lesion and were randomly arranged and assessed by 10 endoscopists. We compared the visibility score (1 to 4) and color differences (ΔE) between inside and outside of the lesions among WLI, NBI, IC, and A-NBI.

RESULTS

Forty-one lesions in 33 cases were included, and a total of 164 images were evaluated. As for the visibility score, most of the lesions were scored as 1 or 2 on WLI, whereas most were scored 4 on A-NBI. The median ΔE of A-NBI was also significantly higher than that of WLI, NBI, or IC (20.5 vs. 8.3 vs. 8.2 vs. 12.3, P < 0.01). A significant correlation was observed between the color difference and visibility score (r = 0.53, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

A-NBI may be a useful modality for identifying the margin of SSLs.

Sessile serrated lesion presenting as large pedunculated polyp in the rectum: A case report

RATIONALE

Sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) are serrated polyps (SP) with the typical serrated architecture of the crypt lining epithelium. SSL has an important clinical implication because they are recognized as precursor lesion of sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) through "serrated pathway." SSLs usually appear flat to sessile, and are located in the right colon.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 69-year-old man was referred to a tertiary medical center because of intermittent hematochezia for 2 years.

DIAGNOSIS

Colonoscopy revealed a large, pedunculated polyp in the rectum. The polyp surface was slightly reddish in color and the elongated stalk was covered with almost normal mucosa. Histopathological examination of the resected specimens revealed the typical features of SSL with low-grade dysplasia.

INTERVENTION

Endoscopic mucosal resection using a detachable snare was performed on the tumor for definite diagnosis and treatment.

OUTCOMES

There was no evidence of immediate or delayed bleeding after endoscopic mucosal resection, and the hemoglobin level normalized after a 1-year follow-up.

LESSONS

We report a rare case of a large pedunculated polyp with typical histological features of SSLs in the rectum. Endoscopists should always consider SSLs at any location even with unusual morphological findings.

Third Asia-Pacific consensus recommendations on colorectal cancer screening and postpolypectomy surveillance

The Asia-Pacific region has the largest number of cases of colorectal cancer (CRC) and one of the highest levels of mortality due to this condition in the world. Since the publishing of two consensus recommendations in 2008 and 2015, significant advancements have been made in our knowledge of epidemiology, pathology and the natural history of the adenoma-carcinoma progression. Based on the most updated epidemiological and clinical studies in this region, considering literature from international studies, and adopting the modified Delphi process, the Asia-Pacific Working Group on Colorectal Cancer Screening has updated and revised their recommendations on (1) screening methods and preferred strategies; (2) age for starting and terminating screening for CRC; (3) screening for individuals with a family history of CRC or advanced adenoma; (4) surveillance for those with adenomas; (5) screening and surveillance for sessile serrated lesions and (6) quality assurance of screening programmes. Thirteen countries/regions in the Asia-Pacific region were represented in this exercise. International advisors from North America and Europe were invited to participate.

Sessile serrated lesions: Clinicopathological characteristics, endoscopic diagnosis, and management

The 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System (5th edition) introduced the term "sessile serrated lesion" (SSL) to replace the term "sessile serrated adenoma/polyp" (SSA/P). SSLs are early precursor lesions in the serrated neoplasia pathway that result in colorectal carcinomas with BRAF mutations, methylation for DNA repair genes, a CpG island methylator phenotype, and high levels of microsatellite instability. Some of these lesions can rapidly become dysplastic or invasive carcinomas that exhibit high lymphatic invasion and lymph node metastasis potential. The 2019 WHO classification noted that dysplasia arising in an SSL most likely is an advanced polyp, regardless of the morphologic grade of the dysplasia. Detecting SSLs with or without dysplasia is critical; however, detection of SSLs is challenging, and their identification by endoscopists and pathologists is inconsistent. Furthermore, indications for their endoscopic treatment have not been established. Moreover, SSLs are considered to contribute to the development of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers. Herein, the clinicopathological and endoscopic characteristics of SSLs, including features determined using white light and image-enhanced endoscopy, therapeutic indications, therapeutic methods, and surveillance are reviewed based on the literature. This information may lead to more intensive research to improve detection, diagnosis, and rates of complete resection of these lesions and reduce post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer rates.

Clip Closure Does Not Reduce Risk of Bleeding After Resection of Large Serrated Polyps: Results From a Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Serrated polyps are important colorectal cancer precursors and are most commonly located in the proximal colon, where post-polypectomy bleeding rates are higher. There is limited clinical trial evidence to guide best practices for resection of large serrated polyps (LSPs).

METHODS

In a multicenter trial, patients with large (≥20 mm) non-pedunculated polyps undergoing endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) were randomized to clipping of the resection base or no clipping. This analysis is stratified by histologic subtype of study polyp(s), categorized as serrated [sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) or hyperplastic polyps (HPs)] or adenomatous, comparing clip vs control groups. The primary outcome was severe post-procedure bleeding within 30 days of colonoscopy.

RESULTS

A total of 179 participants with 199 LSPs (191 SSLs and 8 HPs) and 730 participants with 771 adenomatous polyps were included in the study. Overall, 5 patients with LSPs (2.8%) experienced post-procedure bleeding compared with 42 (5.8%) of those with adenomas. There was no difference in post-procedure bleeding rates between patients in the clip vs control group among those with LSPs (2.3% vs 3.3%, respectively, difference 1.0%; P = NS). However, among those with adenomatous polyps, clipping was associated with a lower risk of post-procedure bleeding (3.9% vs 7.6%, difference 3.7%; P = .03) and overall serious adverse events (5.5% vs 10.6%, difference 5.1%; P = .01).

CONCLUSION

The post-procedure bleeding risk for LSPs removed via EMR is low, and there is no discernable benefit of prophylactic clipping of the resection base in this group. This study indicates that the benefit of endoscopic clipping following EMR may be specific for >2 cm adenomatous polyps located in the proximal colon.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov, Number: NCT01936948.

Serrated Colorectal Lesions: An Up-to-Date Review from Histological Pattern to Molecular Pathogenesis

Until 2010, colorectal serrated lesions were generally considered as harmless lesions and reported as hyperplastic polyps (HPs) by pathologists and gastroenterologists. However, recent evidence showed that they may bear the potential to develop into colorectal carcinoma (CRC). Therefore, the World Health Organization (WHO) classification has identified four categories of serrated lesions: hyperplastic polyps (HPs), sessile serrated lesions (SSLs), traditional serrated adenoma (TSAs) and unclassified serrated adenomas. SSLs with dysplasia and TSAs are the most common precursors of CRC. CRCs arising from serrated lesions originate via two different molecular pathways, namely sporadic microsatellite instability (MSI) and the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), the latter being considered as the major mechanism that drives the serrated pathway towards CRC. Unlike CRCs arising through the adenoma-carcinoma pathway, APC-inactivating mutations are rarely shown in the serrated neoplasia pathway.

Endoscopic features of isolated and traditional serrated adenoma-associated superficially serrated adenomas of the colorectum

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Superficially serrated adenoma (SuSA) is a recently proposed subtype of colorectal serrated lesions. It is characterized by distinct clinicopathological and molecular features, including mixed serrated and adenomatous histology and frequent genetic alterations involving KRAS and RSPO. This study aimed to characterize the endoscopic features of isolated and traditional serrated adenoma (TSA)-associated SuSAs.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the endoscopic findings of 25 isolated SuSAs and 21 TSA-associated SuSAs that were histologically and molecularly characterized.

RESULTS

SuSAs appeared as a sessile polyp or slightly elevated lesion located mostly in the sigmoid colon and rectum (88%). The size was between 3 and 20 mm (median, 6 mm). Most of them exhibited KRAS mutations (96%) and RSPO fusions/overexpression (92%). Endoscopically, many lesions had a whitish color (84%), a distinct border (96%), an irregular border (76%), and a lobulated surface (72%). However, diminutive lesions exhibited overlapping features with hyperplastic polyps. On narrow-band imaging, vessel patterns were invisible or appeared as lacy microvessels in most lesions (80%). Chromoendoscopy invariably showed stellar or elongated/branched stellar pits, indicating a serrated microarchitecture. Most TSA-associated SuSAs typically presented as polyps with a two-tier raised appearance, consisting of whitish lower and reddish higher components corresponding to a SuSA and a TSA, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

SuSAs exhibit several characteristic endoscopic features on white-light and image-enhanced endoscopy. Diminutive lesions exhibit endoscopic features overlapping with hyperplastic polyps. Nonetheless, the endoscopic diagnosis of larger and TSA-associated SuSAs may be feasible.

Prevalence of serrated lesions, risk factors, and their association with synchronous advanced colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic screened individuals

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Serrated lesions (SLs) have attracted attention as precursors of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, their prevalence, risk factors, and clinical significance have not been satisfactorily elucidated. This study used high-quality colonoscopy data to determine the prevalence of SLs and to identify their risk factors and relationship with synchronous advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) in asymptomatic screened individuals.

METHODS

This study included data for 5218 individuals who underwent first-time screening colonoscopy by highly experienced endoscopists. The relationships between baseline characteristics and the presence of SLs and those between the presence of SLs and synchronous ACN were assessed using the chi-squared test and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

The proportions of individuals with SLs and right-sided SLs were 23.3% and 7.6%, respectively. Age, sex, family history of CRC, smoking, and body mass index were significantly related with the presence of SLs, and current smoking was most strongly associated with SLs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1-3.2). The aOR (95% CI) of the presence of SLs, SLs sized ≥ 10 mm, and right-sided SLs ≥ 5 mm for synchronous ACN was 1.4 (1.1-1.9), 3.5 (1.3-9.6), and 1.9 (1.0-3.8), respectively. The presence of left-sided SLs ≥ 10 mm (without right-sided SLs) was also significantly associated with ACN (aOR 8.1, 95% CI 2.0-33.7).

CONCLUSIONS

The relatively high prevalence of SLs and risk factors in screened individuals were elucidated and the significant relationship between SLs, particularly SLs ≥ 10 mm and right-sided SLs ≥ 5 mm, and synchronous ACN was confirmed.

Underwater vs conventional endoscopic mucosal resection in treatment of colorectal polyps: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) of colorectal lesions is emerging as an alternative method to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR); however, it is still controversial whether there is a difference in the effectiveness between UEMR and EMR.

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of UEMR in the treatment of colorectal polyps.

METHODS

Clinical studies comparing the effectiveness or safety of UEMR in the treatment of colorectal polyps were searched in medical databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang Data, monographs, theses, and papers presented at conferences. Statistical analyses were performed using Revman 5.3 software.

RESULTS

Seven non-randomized controlled trials and one randomized controlled trial met the inclusion criteria. In total, 1382 patients (1511 polyps) were included in the study, including 722 who received UEMR and 789 who received EMR. In the UEMR and EMR groups, the en bloc resection rates were 85.87% and 73.89%, respectively, with a relative risk (RR) value of 1.14 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.30; P < 0.05). In the sub-group analysis, the en bloc resection rate showed no statistically significant difference between the EMR and UEMR groups for polyps less than 20 mm in diameter. However, a statistically significant difference was found between the EMR and UEMR groups for polyps equal to or greater than 20 mm in diameter. The post-endoscopic resection recurrence rates at 3-6 mo of the UEMR and EMR groups were 3.26% and 15.17%, respectively, with an RR value of 0.27 (95%CI: 0.09-0.83; P < 0.05). The post-endoscopic resection recurrence rates of UEMR and EMR at 12 mo were 6.25% and 14.40%, respectively, with an RR value of 0.43 (95%CI: 0.20-0.92; P < 0.05). Additionally, the incidence of adverse events was 8.17% and 6.21%, respectively, with an RR value of 1.07 (95%CI: 0.50-2.30; P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

UEMR is an effective technique for colorectal polyps and appears to have some advantages over EMR, particularly with regard to some treatment outcomes.

Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Resection of Sessile Serrated Polyps 10 mm or Larger: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The best method for endoscopic resection of sessile serrated polyps (SSP) 10 mm or larger is unclear; studies report variable outcomes in comparison to conventional adenomas. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of resection of SSPs 10 mm or larger in size.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies reporting data on endoscopic resection of SSPs 10 mm or larger, through May 31st, 2019. The primary outcome was rate of residual SSP, which was the rate of residual SSP found at the polypectomy site during the first follow-up colonoscopy. Secondary outcomes were: technical success (rate of complete macroscopic resection), R0 resection rate (complete histological resection with absence of any polyp tissue at the lateral and deep margins after en-bloc resection), and adverse events (immediate or delayed bleeding and perforation). We performed IQR,group analyses for outcomes based on polyp size and resection techniques. Pooled proportion rates (%) or odds ratio with 95% CIs with heterogeneity (I²) and P < .05.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies met the inclusion criteria: 911 patients (50.2% male; mean age, 62.8 ± 4.9 years) who underwent resection of 1137 SSPs (574 SSPs ≥ 20 mm) with a median polyp size of 19.4 mm (interquartile range, 15.9-29.6 mm). Follow-up information was available for 832 SSPs with a median follow-up duration of 12 months (interquartile range, 6-22.5 months). Piecemeal resection was performed in 58.5% SSPs. The pooled residual SSP rate was 4.3% (95% CI, 2%-6.5%). There was a higher residual SSP rate for polyps ≥ 20 mm compared to 10-19 mm (5.9% vs 1.2%; odds ratio, 3.02; 95% CI, 1-9.2; P = .049). Cold endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) had significantly lower rates of delayed bleeding (0 vs 2.3%; P = .03) and residual polyp rate (0.9% vs 5%; P=.01) compared to hot EMR, based on univariate analysis. In multi-variate analysis there was no difference in residual polyp rate. There was no significant difference in other outcomes based on the size or method of resection.

CONCLUSIONS

In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that SSPs ≥ 10 mm can be safely resected with low residual polyp rates. Polyp size ≥ 20 mm is a significant factor for residual polyp. Compared to hot EMR, cold EMR is associated with a lower rate of delayed bleeding. Randomized controlled trials comparing hot and cold resection are needed to standardize techniques and optimize outcomes.

Usefulness of narrow-band imaging for the detection of remnant sessile-serrated adenoma (SSA) tissue after endoscopic resection: the KASID multicenter study

BACKGROUND

A sessile-serrated adenoma (SSA) has a high risk for incomplete resection. Little is known regarding how to immediately detect remnant SSA tissue after endoscopic resection. We investigated the usefulness of narrow-band imaging (NBI) to detect remnant SSA tissue after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR).

METHODS

We performed a prospective randomized study on 138 patients who had suspicious SSA on colonoscopy at five centers. After EMR on the suspected SSA determined on the endoscopic morphology, all lesions were randomized into two inspection methods, NBI and white light endoscopy (WLE), to detect remnant tissue on the resected margin. If remnant tissue was detected, an additional resection was performed. Finally, we obtained quadrant biopsies on the resection margin to evaluate the incomplete resection. The proportion of incomplete resection was calculated by combining the detection of remnant tissue and the positivity of SSA cells on the final quadrant biopsies. The primary outcome was the proportion of remnant tissue detection, and the secondary outcome was the proportion of incomplete resection of SSA.

RESULTS

In all, 145 lesions from 138 patients were removed. The diagnostic rate of SSA was 87.6% (127/145). After randomization, NBI inspection was performed on 69 lesions, and WLE inspection was performed on 76 lesions. The histologic diagnostic rate of SSA was 89.9% (62/69) in the NBI group and 85.5% (65/76) in the WLE group (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in the detection of remnant tissue (12.9% (8/62) vs. 15.4% (10/65), p > 0.05), the proportion of SSA in remnant tissue (11.3% (7/62) vs. 12.3% (8/65), p > 0.05), or the proportion of incomplete resection (6.5 (4/62) vs. 10.8 (7/65), p > 0.05) between the NBI and WLE inspection groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

NBI was not superior to WLE for detecting remnant SSA tissue after EMR and could not decrease the proportion of incomplete resection of SSA.

Usefulness of the Japan narrow-band imaging expert team classification system for the diagnosis of sessile serrated lesion with dysplasia/carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Sessile serrated lesion (SSL) is a colorectal polyp that has malignant potential. However, the dysplastic components within an SSL can be difficult to diagnose with conventional endoscopy, because most SSLs with dysplasia/carcinoma have subtle mucosal features. Many studies have indicated that narrow-band imaging (NBI) observations of colorectal polyps are very useful, accurate predictors of histology. We aimed to verify the usefulness of the Japan NBI Expert Team (JNET) classification system for the diagnosis of SSLs with dysplasia/carcinoma.

METHODS

We examined 709 endoscopically or surgically resected lesions that were pathologically diagnosed as SSL, including 647 with no dysplasia, 37 with low-grade dysplasia, 15 with high-grade dysplasia, and 10 with submucosal invasive carcinoma. We retrospectively evaluated their clinicopathologic characteristics and conventional endoscopic and magnifying NBI endoscopic findings using the JNET system.

RESULTS

Cases in all groups were more frequently located in the proximal colon. Submucosal invasive carcinomas were significantly larger than no dysplasia and low-grade dysplasia lesions. Almost all studied lesions (96.3%) were covered with a mucus cap. Five hundred and eighty (81.8%) lesions exhibited dark spots inside the crypts, which are NBI findings' characteristic of SSL. As for the JNET classification of magnifying NBI endoscopic findings, all 709 lesions showed Type 1. Six hundred and eighteen (95.5%) SSLs with no dysplasia lesions exhibited Type 1 only, whereas 52 (83.9%) SSLs with dysplasia/carcinoma had a combination of Type 1 and Type 2A, 2B, or 3, corresponding to SSL and dysplasia/carcinoma, respectively. The JNET classification had high sensitivity (83.9%), specificity (95.5%), and overall diagnostic accuracy (94.5%) for diagnosing SSLs with dysplasia/carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of magnifying NBI endoscopy with the JNET classification might be useful for diagnosing SSLs with dysplasia/carcinoma. This increased awareness may also improve the recognition of SSLs with dysplasia/carcinoma.

Colorectal Cancer Screening for the Serrated Pathway

Serrated polyps are classified into hyperplastic polyps, sessile serrated adenomas/polyps, and traditional serrated adenomas. Although all serrated polyps share characteristic colonic crypts serrations, distinguishing hyperplastic polyps from sessile serrated adenomas/polyps is challenging. Traditional serrated adenomas are cytologically dysplastic lesions; sessile serrated adenomas/polyps develop cytologic dysplasia as they progress to colorectal cancer. A flat and pale appearance of serrated polyps may make detection difficult. Endoscopic mucosal resection has higher rates of complete resection. Close surveillance is recommended for sessile serrated adenomas/polyps, sessile serrated adenomas/polyp with dysplasia, hyperplastic polyps ≥10 mm, and traditional serrated adenomas.

Serrated polyps of the colon and rectum: Remove or not?

In recent years, the serrated neoplasia pathway where serrated polyps arise as a colorectal cancer has gained considerable attention as a new carcinogenic pathway. Colorectal serrated polyps are histopathologically classified into hyperplastic polyps (HPs), sessile serrated lesions, and traditional serrated adenomas; in the serrated neoplasia pathway, the latter two are considered to be premalignant. In western countries, all colorectal polyps, including serrated polyps, apart from diminutive rectosigmoid HPs are removed. However, in Asian countries, the treatment strategy for colorectal serrated polyps has remained unestablished. Therefore, in this review, we described the clinicopathological features of colorectal serrated polyps and proposed to remove HPs and sessile serrated lesions ≥ 6 mm in size, and traditional serrated adenomas of any size.

Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection

Suitable lesions for endoscopic treatment include not only early colorectal carcinomas but also several types of precarcinomatous adenomas. It is important to establish practical guidelines wherein preoperative diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia and selection of endoscopic treatment procedures are appropriately outlined and to ensure that actual endoscopic treatment is useful and safe in general hospitals when carried out in accordance with guidelines. In cooperation with the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, the Japanese Society of Coloproctology, and the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society compiled colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection guidelines by using evidence-based methods in 2014. The first edition of these guidelines was published 5 years ago. Accordingly, we have published the second edition of these guidelines based on recent new knowledge and evidence.

An update on the morphology and molecular pathology of serrated colorectal polyps and associated carcinomas

Our understanding of serrated colorectal polyps has increased dramatically over the past two decades and has led to a modern classification scheme for these lesions. Sessile serrated polyps with dysplasia represent the most clinically significant serrated polyp; however, the morphologic heterogeneity of dysplasia in sessile serrated polyps has only recently been recognized and correlated with MLH1 immunohistochemistry. Detailed morphologic analysis of traditional serrated adenomas has led to the recognition of flat and early forms of this polyp. Robust data on the risk of metachronous lesions in patients with serrated polyps are also beginning to emerge. This review will summarize our current understanding of serrated polyps and associated carcinomas with a focus on diagnostic criteria, morphologic heterogeneity, molecular findings, and natural history. Controversial issues in the diagnosis and classification of these polyps are also discussed.

Terminology, Molecular Features, Epidemiology, and Management of Serrated Colorectal Neoplasia

In addition to the adenoma to carcinoma sequence, colorectal carcinogenesis can occur via the serrated pathway. Studies have focused on clarification of categories and molecular features of serrated polyps, as well as endoscopic detection and risk assessment. Guidelines from the World Health Organization propose assigning serrated polyps to categories of hyperplastic polyps, traditional serrated adenomas, and sessile serrated lesions (SSLs). Traditional serrated adenomas and SSLs are precursors to colorectal cancer. The serrated pathway is characterized by mutations in RAS and RAF, disruptions to the Wnt signaling pathway, and widespread methylation of CpG islands. Epidemiology studies of serrated polyps have been hampered by inconsistencies in terminology and reporting, but the prevalence of serrated class polyps is 20%-40% in average-risk individuals; most serrated polyps detected are hyperplastic. SSLs, the most common premalignant serrated subtype, and are found in up to 15% of average-risk patients by high-detecting endoscopists. Variations in rate of endoscopic detection of serrated polyps indicate the need for careful examination, with adequate bowel preparation and sufficient withdrawal times. Risk factors for SSLs include white race, family history of colorectal cancer, smoking, and alcohol intake. Patients with serrated polyps, particularly SSLs and traditional serrated adenomas, have an increased risk of synchronous and metachronous advanced neoplasia. Surveillance guidelines vary among countries, but SSLs and proximal hyperplastic polyps require special attention in assignment of surveillance interval-especially in light of concerns regarding incomplete detection and resection.

Clinicopathological features, diagnosis, and treatment of sessile serrated adenoma/polyp with dysplasia/carcinoma

Sessile serrated adenoma/polyps (SSA/Ps) are early precursor lesions in the serrated neoplasia pathway, which results in BRAF-mutated colorectal carcinomas with not only high levels of microsatellite instability but also microsatellite stable. SSA/Ps with advanced histology, including cytological dysplasia or minimally invasive carcinomas, are important lesions because SSA/Ps are considered major contributors to "interval cancers" and these lesions can rapidly become dysplastic or invasive carcinomas. Clinicopathologically, SSA/Ps with dysplasia or invasive carcinoma were associated with advanced age, female sex, and proximal colon. Although SSA/Ps with submucosal invasive carcinoma were smaller and invaded less deeply into the submucosal layer than conventional tubular adenomas with submucosal invasive carcinoma, SSA/Ps with submucosal invasive carcinoma frequently had a mucinous component and exhibited a higher potential for lymphatic invasion and lymph node metastasis. In an SSA/P series, endoscopic characteristics, including (semi)pedunculated morphology, double elevation, central depression, and reddishness, may help accurately diagnose SSA/Ps with advanced histology. Removal of SSA/Ps with dysplasia or invasive carcinoma was recommended. Endoscopic treatment such as endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection is useful for those lesions. However, surgical resection with lymph node dissection might be indicated when SSA/Ps with invasive carcinoma are endoscopically suspected, because these have the high risk of lymph node metastasis. Greater awareness may promote further research into improving the detection, recognition, and complete resection rates of SSA/Ps with dysplasia or invasive carcinoma and reduce the interval cancer rates.

Comparison of Underwater vs Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Intermediate-Size Colorectal Polyps

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with submucosal injection is an established method for removing colorectal polyps, although the en bloc resection rate decreases when polyp size exceeds 10 mm. Piecemeal resection increases local recurrence. Underwater EMR (UEMR) is an effective technique for removal of sessile colorectal polyps and we investigated whether it is superior to conventional EMR (CEMR).

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter randomized controlled trial at 5 institutions in Japan. Patients with endoscopically diagnosed, intermediate-size (10-20 mm) sessile colorectal lesions were randomly assigned to undergo UEMR or CEMR. Only the most proximal lesion was registered. The UEMR procedure included immersion of the entire lumen in water and snare resection of the lesion without submucosal injection of normal saline. We analyzed outcomes of 108 colorectal lesions in the UEMR group and 102 lesions in the CEMR group. R0 resection was defined as en bloc resection with a histologically confirmed negative resection margin. The primary endpoint was the difference in the R0 resection rates between groups.

RESULTS

The proportions of R0 resections were 69% (95% confidence interval [CI] 59%-77%) in the UEMR group vs 50% (95% CI 40%-60%) in the CEMR group (P = .011). The proportions of en bloc resections were 89% (95% CI 81%-94%) in the UEMR group vs 75% (95% CI 65%-83%) in the CEMR group (P = .007). There was no significant difference in median procedure time (165 vs 175 seconds) or proportions of patients with adverse events (2.8% in the UEMR group vs 2.0% in the CEMR group).

CONCLUSIONS

In a multicenter randomized controlled trial, we found that UEMR significantly increased the proportions of R0 resections for 10- to 20-mm sessile colorectal lesions without increasing adverse events or procedure time. Use of this procedure should be encouraged. Trials registry number: UMIN000018989.

Clinical and endoscopic characteristics of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps with dysplasia/adenocarcinoma in a Korean population: A Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases (KASID) multicenter study

Sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/Ps) are precancerous lesions that account for one-third of colorectal cancers. The endoscopic and pathologic differentiation between SSA/Ps without dysplasia (SSA/POs) and SSA/Ps with dysplasia or adenocarcinoma (SSA/PDAs) can be difficult. This study aimed to assess the clinical characteristics of SSA/PDs. This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 532 patients who underwent endoscopic resection and were pathologically diagnosed with SSA/POs and SSA/PDAs. Initially, medical, endoscopic, and histopathological records of patients who underwent endoscopic resection of SSA/POs and SSA/PDAs at eight university hospitals in Korea between January 2005 and December 2015 were reviewed. A total of 307 (57.7%) patients were detected in men and 319 (60.0%) were located in the proximal colon. Most SSA/Ps had a flat, slightly elevated, or sessile morphology. The most prevalent endoscopic findings of SSA/Ps were nodular surface (244, 45.9%), disrupted vascular pattern (232, 43.6%), altered fold contour (141, 26.5%), dome-shaped morphology (135, 25.4%), and pale color (115, 21.6%). SSA/POs were more commonly found in the proximal colon, compared to SSA/PDAs. SSA/PDAs displayed 0-Ip, Isp, IIb or IIa + IIc morphologies more frequently, while SSA/POs displayed 0-Is or IIa morphology more frequently. The frequency of a rim of debris/bubbles was significantly higher in SSA/POs, while nodular surface and disrupted vascular pattern were significantly higher in SSA/PDAs. In the univariate analysis of endoscopic features, SSA/PDAs were significantly associated with the distal colon location, 0-Isp and IIb morphologies, nodular surface, and disrupted vascular pattern. In the multivariate analysis, 0-IIb, nodular surface, and disrupted vascular pattern were significantly associated with SSA/PDAs. SSA/Ps with 0-IIb morphology, nodular surface and disrupted vascular pattern are associated with an increased risk of dysplasia or adenocarcinoma.

Endoscopic features of sessile serrated adenoma/polyps under narrowband imaging: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Sessile serrated adenoma/polyps (SSA/P) are recognized as precancerous lesions in the colon and resemble hyperplastic polyps (HP). Definite endoscopic features under narrow band imaging (NBI) with or without magnification may help differentiate these two lesions. Our study aimed to identify specific endoscopic features of SSA/P by NBI.

METHODS

A total of 199 patients with histopathologically proven colorectal SSA/P or HP after a polypectomy were enrolled. Magnifying and non-magnifying NBI pictures of 206 matching lesions were evaluated by one expert and two non-expert endoscopists using various endoscopic characteristics retrospectively.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis indicated that a clouded surface (odds ratio [OR] 6.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.72-15.44, P = 0.000) and dilated and branching vessels (DBV) (OR 7.95, 95% CI 3.71-17.02, P = 0.000) were significant endoscopic features for diagnosing SSA/P compared with HP. The combination of these two features could improve diagnostic specificity to 96%, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.749. However, it seemed that the presence of dark spots (OR 1.93, 95% CI 0.94-4.00, P = 0.075) was not a definite feature in differentiating these two lesions. Neither a mucus cap nor CP-II meshed capillary vessels showed statistical significance in differentiating SSA/P from HP (P = 0.590 and 0.293, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

A clouded surface and DBV were two indicators for diagnosing SSA/P. Combining these two factors together under NBI with or without magnification achieved better diagnostic performance than when they were used alone.

Volumetric growth rates of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps observed in situ at longitudinal CT colonography

OBJECTIVE

Sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/Ps) are now recognized as potential cancer precursors, but little is known about their natural history. We assessed the in vivo growth rates of histologically proven SSA/Ps at longitudinal CT colonography (CTC) and compared results with non-advanced tubular adenomas (TAs).

METHODS

We identified a cohort of 53 patients (mean age, 54.8 ± 5.5 years; M:F, 26:27) from one center with a total of 58 SSA/Ps followed longitudinally at CTC (mean follow-up interval, 5.3 ± 1.9 years). Initial and final size measurements were determined using dedicated CTC software. Findings were compared with 141 non-advanced TAs followed at CTC (mean, 4.1 ± 2.3 years) in 113 patients (mean age, 56.8 ± 6.9 years).

RESULTS

SSA/Ps were more often flat (62% [36/58] vs. 14% [20/141], p < 0.0001) and right-sided (98% [57/58] vs. 46% [65/141], p < 0.0001) compared with TAs. Initial average diameter was greater for SSA/Ps (9.3 mm vs. 6.3 mm; p < 0.0001). Mean annual volumetric growth was + 12.7%/year for SSA/Ps vs. + 36.4%/year for TAs (p = 0.028). Using a previously defined threshold of + 20% increase in volume/year to define progression, 22% (13/58) of SSA/Ps and 41% (58/141) of TAs progressed (p = 0.014). None of the SSA/Ps had dysplasia or invasive cancer at histopathology.

CONCLUSIONS

Sessile serrated adenoma/polyps demonstrate slower growth compared with conventional non-advanced tubular adenomas, despite larger initial linear size. This less aggressive behavior may help explain the more advanced patient age for serrated pathway cancers. Furthermore, these findings could help inform future colonoscopic surveillance strategies, as current guidelines are largely restricted to expert opinion related to the absence of natural history data.

KEY POINTS

• Sessile serrated adenoma/polyps (SSA/Ps) tend to be flat, right-sided, and demonstrate slower growth compared with conventional non-advanced tubular adenomas. • This less aggressive behavior of SSA/Ps may help explain the more advanced patient age for serrated pathway cancers.

Endoscopic diagnosis of sessile serrated polyp: A systematic review

The aim of the present review was to clarify how we should detect and diagnose sessile serrated polyps (SSP) endoscopically. A systematic search was conducted of MEDLINE from January 2004 through March 2018. Nine findings: (i) proximal location; (ii) size >10 mm; (iii) irregular shape; (iv) indistinctive border; (v) cloud-like surface; (vi) mucus cap; (vii) rim of debris in white-light endoscopy; (viii) dilated vessels; and (ix) dilated crypts (pits) in image-enhanced endoscopy were considered to be candidate discriminators of SSP from hyperplastic polyps. Prospective studies in a general setting are warranted to validate the above-mentioned endoscopic features of SSP during real-time colonoscopy and to determine whether these features are useful for the differential diagnosis of SSP.

The dark side of the colon: current issues surrounding the significance, prevalence, detection, diagnosis and management of serrated polyps

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hyperplastic polyps, once considered to have no malignant potential, are now recognized to be part of a larger group of polyps known as serrated polyps. Serrated polyps can progress to CRC through an epigenetic pathway known as CpG Island Methylator Phenotype (CIMP), characterized by hypermethylation of specific DNA regions such as the promoter regions of the DNA mismatch repair genes like MLH1. The CIMP pathway is tightly linked with mutations of the oncogene BRAF. There are three subtypes of serrated polyps - hyperplastic polyps, sessile serrated polyps (SSPs) and traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs). TSAs harbor cytologic dysplasia whereas hyperplastic polyps and SSPs are nondysplastic lesions. Currently, only SSPs and TSAs are believed to progress to CRC whereas hyperplastic polyps are thought to be benign with no malignant potential. This article will review the current evidence while highlighting some of the issues regarding serrated polyps.

RECENT FINDINGS

One challenge has been pathologically distinguishing hyperplastic polyps from SSPs, which is an important distinction, given the potential for progression of SSPs to CRC. Other challenges regarding serrated polyps include adequate detection and resection. Surveillance guideline recommendations for some serrated polyps have been changed in current guidelines to reflect the malignant potential, recommending closer surveillance intervals than the 10-year follow-up that has been traditionally provided for hyperplastic polyps.

SUMMARY

Given the difficulties in diagnosing as well as resecting, it is important for endoscopists to know how to detect, resect and manage follow-up in patients with serrated polyps.

Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection of serrated adenomas

OBJECTIVES

Serrated polyps, which are considered to be precursors of colorectal carcinoma, include hyperplastic polyps, sessile serrated adenomas and traditional serrated adenomas. With the exception of hyperplastic polyps, all of these lesions must be removed. This study sought to examine whether underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is a safe and effective technique for treating serrated polyps.

METHODS

Cases in which patients were submitted for underwater endoscopic mucosal resection and histologically diagnosed with sessile serrated adenoma were prospectively registered.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 54.5 years (range, 48 to 72 years), and the patients included 4 men (28.5%) and 10 women (71.5%). One lesion (6.2%), 10 lesions (62.5%), 1 lesion (6.2%), 3 lesions (18.8%) and 1 lesion (6.2%) were found in the cecum, the ascending colon, the hepatic flexure, the transverse colon and the descending colon, respectively. The median lesion size was 20 mm (range, 10 to 35 mm). Eight lesions (50%) were removed en bloc, and the remaining eight lesions (50%) were removed using a piecemeal technique. None of the cases were complicated by perforation or delayed bleeding.

CONCLUSION

Underwater resection could be a feasible, safe and effective alternative for the resection of sessile serrated adenomas.

Randomised controlled trial comparing modified Sano’s and narrow band imaging international colorectal endoscopic classifications for colorectal lesions

AIM

To assess the utility of modified Sano′s (MS) vs the narrow band imaging international colorectal endoscopic (NICE) classification in differentiating colorectal polyps.

METHODS

Patients undergoing colonoscopy between 2013 and 2015 were enrolled in this trial. Based on the MS or the NICE classifications, patients were randomised for real-time endoscopic diagnosis. This was followed by biopsies, endoscopic or surgical resection. The endoscopic diagnosis was then compared to the final (blinded) histopathology. The primary endpoint was the sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of differentiating neoplastic and non-neoplastic polyps (MS II/IIo / IIIa / IIIb vs I or NICE 1 vs 2/3). The secondary endpoints were “endoscopic resectability” (MS II/IIo/IIIa vs I/IIIb or NICE 2 vs 1/3), NPV for diminutive distal adenomas and prediction of post-polypectomy surveillance intervals.

RESULTS

A total of 348 patients were evaluated. The Sn, Sp, PPV and NPV in differentiating neoplastic polyps from non-neoplastic polyps were, 98.9%, 85.7%, 98.2% and 90.9% for MS; and 99.1%, 57.7%, 95.4% and 88.2% for NICE, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for MS was 0.92 (95%CI: 0.86-0.98); and AUC for NICE was 0.78 (95%CI: 0.69, 0.88). The Sn, Sp, PPV and NPV in predicting “endoscopic resectability” were 98.9%, 86.1%, 97.8% and 92.5% for MS; and 98.6%, 66.7%, 94.7% and 88.9% for NICE, respectively. The AUC for MS was 0.92 (95%CI: 0.87-0.98); and the AUC for NICE was 0.83 (95%CI: 0.75-0.90). The AUC values were statistically different for both comparisons (P = 0.0165 and P = 0.0420, respectively). The accuracy for diagnosis of sessile serrated adenoma/polyp (SSA/P) with high confidence utilizing MS classification was 93.2%. The differentiation of SSA/P from other lesions achieved Sp, Sn, PPV and NPV of 87.2%, 91.5%, 89.6% and 98.6%, respectively. The NPV for predicting adenomas in diminutive rectosigmoid polyps (n = 150) was 96.6% and 95% with MS and NICE respectively. The calculated accuracy of post-polypectomy surveillance for MS group was 98.2% (167 out of 170) and for NICE group was 92.1% (139 out of 151).

CONCLUSION

The MS classification outperformed the NICE classification in differentiating neoplastic polyps and predicting endoscopic resectability. Both classifications met ASGE PIVI thresholds.

Comparison of Small Versus Large Volume Split Dose Preparation for Colonoscopy: A Study of Colonoscopy Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Split dose bowel preparations (SDP) have superior outcomes for colonoscopy as compared to evening before regimens. However, the association of the actual volume of the SDP to colonoscopy outcome measures has not been well studied.

AIMS

Compare adenoma detection rate (ADR), sessile serrated polyp detection rate (SDR), mean bowel cleanse score, and predictors of inadequate exams between small volume SDP and large volume SDP.

METHODS

We have conducted a retrospective study in patients undergoing colonoscopy with small volume SDP versus large volume SDP between July 2014 and December 2014. Basic demographics (age, gender and BMI) along with clinical co-morbidities were recorded. Quality of the bowel preparation, ADR and SDR was compared between these groups. Univariate and multivariable logistic regressions were used to assess the determinants of inadequate exams in each group.

RESULTS

1573 patients with split dose preparation were included in this retrospective study. 58.4% (920/1573) patients took small volume SDP. There was no difference in ADR (37.9 vs. 38.8%, p = 0.2); however, SDR was higher for small volume SDP compared to large volume SDP (11.9 vs. 7.9% p = 0.005). There was no difference in the rate of inadequate exams between the two groups (p = 0.7). A history of diabetes and constipation was associated with inadequate exams only in the small volume SDP.

CONCLUSIONS

SDR was higher in small volume SDP. There was no difference in rate of inadequate exams between the two groups. A history of diabetes and constipation was associated with inadequate exams only in patients with the small volume SDP.

Endoscopic diagnosis of sessile serrated adenoma/polyp with and without dysplasia/carcinoma

Sessile serrated adenoma/polyps (SSA/Ps) are early precursor lesions in the serrated neoplasia pathway, which results in colorectal carcinomas with BRAF mutations, methylation for DNA repair genes, a CpG island methylator phenotype, and high levels of microsatellite instability. Some of these lesions can rapidly become dysplastic or invasive carcinomas that exhibit high lymphatic invasion and lymph node metastasis potentials. Detecting serrated lesions, including SSA/Ps with and without dysplasia/carcinoma, is critical, but SSA/Ps can be difficult to detect, are inconsistently identified by endoscopists and pathologists, and are often incompletely resected. Therefore, SSA/Ps are considered to be major contributors to “interval cancers”. If colonoscopists can identify the specific endoscopic characteristics of SSA/Ps, their detection and the effectiveness of colonoscopy may improve. Here, the endoscopic features of SSA/Ps with and without dysplasia/carcinoma, including the characteristics determined using magnifying endoscopy, are reviewed in the context of previous reports. Endoscopically, these subtle polyps are like hyperplastic polyps, because they are slightly elevated and pale. Unlike hyperplastic polyps, SSA/Ps are usually larger than 5 mm, frequently covered by a thin layer called the ‘‘mucus cap’’, and are more commonly located in the proximal colon. Magnifying narrow-band imaging findings, which include dark spots inside the crypts and varicose microvascular vessels, in addition to the type II-open pit patterns detected using magnifying chromoendoscopy, effectively differentiate SSA/Ps from hyperplastic polyps. The lesions’ endoscopic characteristics, which include their (semi)pedunculated morphologies, double elevations, central depressions, and reddishness, and the use of magnifying endoscopy, might help to detect dysplasia/carcinoma within SSA/Ps. Greater awareness may promote further research into improving the detection, identification, and complete resection rates of SSA/Ps with and without dysplasia/carcinoma and reduce the interval cancer rates.

Clinical and endoscopic evaluations of sessile serrated adenoma/polyps with cytological dysplasia

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Although sessile serrated adenoma/polyps (SSA/Ps) are considered to be premalignant lesions and rapidly progress to carcinomas after they develop cytological dysplasia (CD), a treatment strategy for SSA/Ps in Asian countries is still being debated and has not yet been established. The present study aimed to propose a treatment strategy for SSA/Ps.

METHODS

Histopathological data of patients, who underwent colonoscopy at our center between January 2011 and December 2016, were reviewed. Data of patients with ≥ 1 SSA/P were retrieved, and clinicopathological characteristics were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 281 patients with 326 SSA/Ps, including 258 patients who had 300 SSA/Ps without CD (SSA/Ps-CD[-]) and 23 patients who had 26 SSA/Ps with CD (SSA/Ps-CD[+]), were evaluated in this study. Although SSA/Ps-CD(+) were often found in older female patients and in the proximal colon, there were no significant differences between SSA/Ps-CD(-) and SSA/Ps-CD(+). Endoscopic morphological findings, such as large or small nodules on the surface and partial protrusion of the lesions, were significantly more common in SSA/Ps-CD(+) than in SSA/Ps-CD(-). Although the diagnostic ability of nodule/protrusion in lesions to predict CD within SSA/Ps was very high with an accuracy of 93.9% and a negative predictive value of 95.4%, sensitivity was low at 46.2%. SSA/Ps-CD(+) were significantly larger than SSA/Ps-CD(-), and the rate of CD within SSA/Ps significantly increased with lesion size (≤ 5 mm, 0%; 6-9 mm, 6.0%; ≥ 10 mm, 13.6%).

CONCLUSION

The study proposes removing all SSA/Ps ≥ 6 mm in order to remove high-risk SSA/Ps-CD(+), with high sensitivity.

Serrated neoplasia pathway as an alternative route of colorectal cancer carcinogenesis

In the past two decades, besides conventional adenoma pathway, a subset of colonic lesions, including hyperplastic polyps, sessile serrated adenoma/polyps, and traditional serrated adenomas have been suggested as precancerous lesions via the alternative serrated neoplasia pathway. Major molecular alterations of sessile serrated neoplasia include BRAF mutation, high CpG island methylator phenotype, and escape of cellular senescence and progression via methylation of tumor suppressor genes or mismatch repair genes. With increasing information of the morphologic and molecular features of serrated lesions, one major challenge is how to reflect this knowledge in clinical practice, such as pathologic and endoscopic diagnosis, and guidelines for treatment and surveillance.

Sessile Serrated Adenomas: How to Detect, Characterize and Resect

Serrated polyps are important contributors to the burden of colorectal cancers (CRC). These lesions were once considered to have no malignant potential, but currently up to 30% of all CRC are recognized to arise from the serrated neoplasia pathway. The primary premalignant lesions are sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/Ps), although traditional serrated adenomas are relatively uncommon. Compared to conventional adenomas, SSA/Ps are morphologically subtle with indistinct borders, may be difficult to detect endoscopically, are more prevalent than previously thought, are associated with synchronous and metachronous advanced neoplasia, and have a higher risk of incomplete resection. Although many lesions remain “dormant,” progressive disease is associated with the development of dysplasia and more rapid progression to CRC. As a result, SSA/Ps are strongly implicated in the development of interval cancers. These factors represent unique challenges that require a meticulous approach to their management. In this review, we summarize the contemporary literature on the characterization, detection and resection of SSA/Ps.

Endoscopic analysis of colorectal serrated lesions with cancer

Serrated lesions, including hyperplastic polyps (HPs), traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs) and sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/Ps), are important contributors to colorectal carcinogenesis. The aim of the present study was to analyze the potential of conventional endoscopy and advanced endoscopic imaging techniques to delineate the characteristic features of serrated lesions with cancer. The present study was a retrospective analysis of the data of 168 patients who had undergone colonoscopy, and a total of 228 serrated lesions (77 HPs, 58 TSAs, 84 SSA/Ps, 9 SSA/P plus TSAs) have been identified in these patients. A cancer component was identified in 2.6% of HPs, 13.8% of TSAs and 10.7% of SSA/Ps, but none of SSA/P plus TSAs. Compared with the lesions without cancer, the lesions with cancer exhibited a larger size (HP, TSA and SSA/P), a reddish appearance (SSA/P), a two-tier raised appearance (HP and SSA/P), a central depression (HP, TSA and SSA/P), the type V pit pattern (HP, TSA and SSA/P), and/or the type III capillary pattern (TSA and SSA/P). Deep invasion was identified in 50.0% of HPs, 12.5% of TSAs and 55.6% of SSA/Ps with cancer. The Ki-67 proliferative zone was distributed diffusely within the area of the cancer, but partially within the non-cancer area of HPs, TSAs and SSA/Ps. The lesion types were also analyzed on the basis of mucin phenotype. The present study suggested that a detailed endoscopic analysis of serrated lesions with cancer is useful for delineating characteristic features, and the analysis aids treatment selection.

Endoscopic Features of Mucous Cap Polyps: A Way to Predict Serrated Polyps

Background/Aims

The aims of the study were to identify whether a mucous-cap predicts the presence of serrated polyps, and to determine whether additional endoscopic findings predict the presence of a sessile serrated adenomas/polyp (SSA/P).

Methods

We analyzed 147 mucous-capped polyps with corresponding histology, during 2011–2014. Eight endoscopic features (presence of borders, elevation, rim of debris, location in the colon, size ≥10 mm, varicose vessels, nodularity, and alteration in mucosal folds) of mucous-capped polyps were examined to see if they can predict SSA/Ps.

Results

A total of 86% (n=126) of mucous-capped polyps were from the right sided serrated pathway (right-sided hyperplastic [n=83], SSA/Ps [n=43], traditional serrated adenoma [n=1]), 10% (n=15) were left-sided hyperplastic polyps, and 3% (n=5) were from the adenoma-carcinoma sequence. The presence of a mucous cap combined with varicose vessels was the only significant predictor for SSA/Ps. The other seven characteristics were not found to be statistically significant for SSA/Ps, although location in the colon and the presence of nodularity trended towards significance.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that mucous-capped polyps have high predictability for being a part of the serrated pathway. Gastroenterologists should be alert for a mucous-capped polyp with varicose veins, as these lesions have a higher risk of SSA/P.

Clinicopathological features of advanced colorectal serrated lesions: A single-center study in China

OBJECTIVE

A growing body of evidence indicates that patients with colorectal serrated lesions, especially advanced serrated lesions (ASLs), are at risk of subsequent malignancy. This study aimed to analyze the clinicopathological features of ASLs and the association between ASLs and synchronous advanced colorectal neoplasia (sACN) in a single center of China.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study of consecutive symptomatic patients and healthy individuals who underwent colonoscopy between January 2010 and March 2016 was performed. Clinicopathological characteritics of the patients with ASLs were documented from the colonoscopy database.

RESULTS

Colorectal serrated lesions were pathologically confirmed in 277 (N = 38 981, 0.7%) cases. Among them, 156 (56.3%) were found to have ASLs, with a total of 161 lesions including 71 sessile serrated adenoma/polyps (SSA/P) and 90 traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs). There were no differences in age and gender between the ASL and non-ASL patients. Among the 161 ASLs, 29 (18.0%) were ≥10 mm in diameter. Compared with non-ASLs, ASLs appeared more in the proximal colon (P = 0.007). Flat and subpedunculated lesions were more commonly found in the ASL group compared with the non-ASL group. Nearly all ASLs (160/161) had dysplasia. Moreover, 16 sACN lesions were found in 156 ASL patients, and large diameter (≥10 mm) might be a significant risk factor for sACN (odds ratio 4.35, 95% confidence interval 1.467-12.894, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

ASLs are more likely to occur in the proximal colon, and mainly present as flat and sub-pedunculated types. Large ASLs are significantly associated with sACN.

Diagnosis and predictors of sessile serrated adenoma after educational training in a large, community-based, integrated healthcare setting

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Sessile serrated adenomas (SSAs) are precursors of 15% to 30% of colorectal cancers but are frequently underdiagnosed. We sought to measure the SSA detection rate (SDR) and predictors of SSA detection after educational training for community gastroenterologists and pathologists.

METHODS

Colonoscopy and pathology data (2010-2014) from 3 medical centers at Kaiser Permanente Northern California were accessed electronically. Gastroenterologists and pathologists attended a training session on SSA diagnosis in 2012. Mean SDRs and patient-level predictors of SSA detection post-training (2013-2014) were investigated.

RESULTS

Mean SDRs increased from .6% in 2010-2012 to 3.7% in 2013-2014. The increase in the detection of proximal SSAs was accompanied by a decrease in the detection of proximal hyperplastic polyps (HPs). Among 34,161 colonoscopies performed in 2013 to 2014, SDRs for screening, fecal immunochemical test positivity, surveillance, and diagnostic indication were 4.2%, 4.5%, 4.9%, and 3.0%, respectively. SSA detection was lower among Asians (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], .46; 95% confidence interval [CI], .31-.69) and Hispanics (aOR, .59; 95% CI, .36-.95) compared with non-Hispanic whites and higher among patients with synchronous conventional adenoma (aOR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.15-1.86), HP (aOR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.30-2.34), and current smokers (aOR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.17-2.72). SDRs varied widely among experienced gastroenterologists, even after training (1.1%-8.1%). There was a moderately strong correlation between adenoma detection rate (ADR) and SDR for any SSA (r = .64, P = .0003) and for right-sided SSAs (r = .71, P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Educational training significantly increased the detection of SSA, but a wide variation in SDR remained across gastroenterologists. SSA detection was inversely associated with Asian and Hispanic race/ethnicity and positively associated with the presence of conventional adenoma, HP, and current smoking. There was a moderately strong correlation between ADR and SDR.

CT colonography interpretation: how to maximize polyp detection and minimize overcalling

This article outlines how to achieve maximum accuracy in interpreting CT colonography (CTC) regarding colonic findings. Interpreting extracolonic findings seen on CTC is a separate diagnostic task and will not be addressed in this article. While many interpretive pitfalls are in fact related to CTC techniques, this article focuses on issues that are related to interpretive knowledge and skills, avoiding in-depth discussions on CTC techniques. Principal methods and further tips for detecting possible polyp candidates and for confirming true soft-tissue polyps will be discussed. Specific points about optimizing interpretation strategies for difficult flat polyps including sessile serrated polyp will be raised. There are numerous interpretive pitfalls regarding the colonic interpretation of CTC. Knowledge of these pitfalls will shorten the learning curve and help achieve accurate reads.

Adjunctive use of chromoendoscopy may improve the diagnostic performance of narrow-band imaging for small sessile serrated adenoma/polyp

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Endoscopic diagnosis of sessile serrated adenoma/polyp (SSA/P) is challenging because of their subtle appearance. Narrow-band imaging (NBI) is useful for diagnosis, but its utility with concurrent chromoendoscopy (CE), especially to detect small SSA/P, is unproven.

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled 367 consecutive patients who underwent screening colonoscopy with the finding of serrated polyps. Patients were divided into derivation and validation cohorts: Diagnostic criteria using different endoscopic modalities were generated by regression analysis in the derivation cohort and were validated in the validation cohort for sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.

RESULTS

There were 180 patients with 119 SSA/P and 147 hyperplastic polyps (HP) in the derivation cohort and 187 patients with 177 SSA/P and 125 HP in the validation cohort. With white-light endoscopy plus NBI, mucus cap, surface grooves, and expanded crypt were most associated with SSA/P. With white-light endoscopy plus CE, II-O pit pattern, mucus cap, and superficial telangiectasia were most associated with SSA/P. With the combined use of these three modalities, II-O pit pattern, mucus cap, and surface grooves were most associated with SSA/P. For large serrated polyp, NBI in combination with CE had a better accuracy than NBI alone (91% vs 86%, P = 0.025) to distinguish SSA/P from HP. CE alone had a better accuracy than NBI alone for distinguishing small SSA/P from small HP (85% vs 72%, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Compared with NBI alone, adjunctive use of CE can improve the diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing SSA/P from HP, especially for small SSA/P.

Utility of the multitarget stool DNA test for detection of colorectal neoplasia

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is an ideal target for screening because it and its precursor lesions are prevalent and can be detected at curable stages among asymptomatic persons. Different screening strategies have been shown to reduce CRC incidence and mortality; therefore, CRC screening is widely recommended. However, despite these demonstrated benefits, a large percentage of the population remains unscreened and efforts are underway in multiple countries to improve screening participation. The multitarget stool DNA test (MT-sDNA) is a new noninvasive option for CRC screening that is a now recommended as a primary CRC screening strategy in the updated guidelines by the US Preventive Services Task Force, American Cancer Society and National Comprehensive Cancer Network. MT-sDNA has high accuracy for detection of both CRC and polyps at the greatest risk of progression, and has potential to improve screening uptake and effectiveness. This review provides a summary of MT-sDNA performance for detection of colorectal neoplasia and a perspective on the value it adds to our screening tool kit.