A novel endoscopic prototype device for gastric full-thickness biopsy for the histopathologic diagnosis of GI neuromuscular pathology: in vivo porcine long-term survival study (with videos)

Endoscopic techniques for full thickness intestinal biopsy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Accurate diagnosis of gastrointestinal neuromuscular diseases requires full thickness biopsy for adequate histologic evaluation of the enteric neuromuscular and ancillary cells. Historically, this has been achieved by surgical approaches. An overview of procedure evolution and current techniques of endoscopic full thickness biopsy (EFTB) for diagnosis of gastrointestinal neuromuscular disorders will be presented.

RECENT FINDINGS

Emergence and advancement of endoscopic full thickness resection techniques has offered a less invasive, nevertheless an effective modality of tissue acquirement. Recently, clip-assisted close-then-cut EFTB has been utilized in clinical practice under research protocol. Early experience has shown that this technique provides an adequate full-thickness specimen including the myenteric plexus and ganglia cells, with acceptable safety profiles.

SUMMARY

EFTB is a promising means in diagnosing the nature of the disease and guiding therapy. Available animal and human studies have shown the noninferiority of endoscopic methods to surgical ones in term of adequacy of tissue samples, while potentially decreasing the risk and occurrence of complications. Further large prospective studies are needed to assess its efficacy, safety and impacts on patient's outcomes.

Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection

Recent advances in minimally invasive endoscopic approaches have pushed the boundaries of well-established resection techniques for therapeutic and diagnostic applications. Endoscopic full thickness resection techniques are a key development in the management of challenging epithelial and subepithelial lesions that are not amenable to conventional endoscopic resection methods and previously required a surgical approach. Endoscopic full thickness biopsy represents a paradigm shift in tissue acquisition and will enhance our understanding of the pathophysiology, and guide therapy, of gastrointestinal neuromuscular diseases, as well as other inflammatory and neoplastic conditions. This review highlights current tools and techniques available for endoscopic full thickness resection and biopsy, as well as outcomes from such interventions.

Endoscopic versus Laparoscopic Full-Thickness Biopsy in the Pathological Evaluation of the Enteric Nervous System

A full-thickness biopsy of the bowel wall is required to evaluate the enteric nervous system. A patient with aggravating gastrointestinal symptoms underwent a laparoscopic full-thickness biopsy of the ileum and, 1 year later, an endoscopic full-thickness biopsy of the sigmoid colon. Both samples showed enteric neuropathy characterized by vacuolated and enlarged neurons. The length of the myenteric plexus was greater in the endoscopic (23 mm) compared to the laparoscopic (11 mm) biopsy, with fewer tissue artefacts in the laparoscopic approach. Clinical deterioration was paralleled by enteric neuropathy with an increase in the percentage of vacuolated and enlarged enteric neurons from 24 to 35%.

Duodenal endoscopic full-thickness resection (with video)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic resection of duodenal non-lifting adenomas and subepithelial tumors is challenging and harbors a significant risk of adverse events. We report on a novel technique for duodenal endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) by using an over-the-scope device.

METHODS

Data of 4 consecutive patients who underwent duodenal EFTR were analyzed retrospectively. Main outcome measures were technical success, R0 resection, histologic confirmation of full-thickness resection, and adverse events. Resections were done with a novel, over-the-scope device (full-thickness resection device, FTRD).

RESULTS

Four patients (median age 60 years) with non-lifting adenomas (2 patients) or subepithelial tumors (2 patients) underwent EFTR in the duodenum. All lesions could be resected successfully. Mean procedure time was 67.5 minutes (range 50-85 minutes). Minor bleeding was observed in 2 cases; blood transfusions were not required. There was no immediate or delayed perforation. Mean diameter of the resection specimen was 28.3 mm (range 22-40 mm). Histology confirmed complete (R0) full-thickness resection in 3 of 4 cases. To date, 2-month endoscopic follow-up has been obtained in 3 patients. In all cases, the over-the-scope clip was still in place and could be removed without adverse events; recurrences were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

EFTR in the duodenum with the FTRD is a promising technique that has the potential to spare surgical resections. Modifications of the device should be made to facilitate introduction by mouth. Prospective studies are needed to further evaluate efficacy and safety for duodenal resections.

Endoscopic full-thickness resection: Current status

Conventional endoscopic resection techniques such as endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection are powerful tools for treatment of gastrointestinal neoplasms. However, those techniques are restricted to superficial layers of the gastrointestinal wall. Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is an evolving technique, which is just about to enter clinical routine. It is not only a powerful tool for diagnostic tissue acquisition but also has the potential to spare surgical therapy in selected patients. This review will give an overview about current EFTR techniques and devices.

Can we use peripheral tissue biopsies to diagnose Parkinson's disease? A review of the literature

Phosphorylated α-synuclein (phosαSYN) containing inclusions in neurons (Lewy bodies, LB) and nerve terminals (Lewy neurites, LN), the pathological hallmark of Parkinson's disease (PD), are not confined to the central nervous system, but have also been reported in peripheral tissues. However, the usefulness of αSYN/phosαSYN detection in tissues accessible to biopsies as a reliable biomarker for prodromal PD remains unclear. A systematic review of studies using biopsies of skin, olfactory and gastrointestinal (GI) tissues was conducted to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of both αSYN and phosαSYN staining in PD patients. Data analysis was hampered by the diversity of the methods used, e.g. choice of biopsy sites, tissue processing, staining protocols and evaluation of the findings. Tissue obtained from GI tract/salivary glands (13 post-mortem, 13 in vivo studies) yielded the highest overall sensitivity and specificity compared to skin (three post-mortem, eight in vivo studies) and olfactory mucosa/bulb (six post-mortem studies, one in vivo study). In contrast to phosαSYN, αSYN was more consistently detectable in peripheral tissues of healthy controls. GI tract/salivary glands appear to be the most promising candidate tissue for peripheral biopsy-taking. phosαSYN is considered as the marker of choice to delineate pathological aggregates from normal αSYN regularly found in peripheral neural tissues. However, the sensitivity and specificity of phosαSYN are not yet acceptable for using phosαSYN as a reliable peripheral biomarker for PD in clinical routine. Further refinement regarding the interpretation of the peripheral αSYN/phosαSYN burden and the phenotypical definition of peripheral LB/LN is needed to optimize screening methods for prodromal PD.