1
|
Pezzoli A, Guarino M, Fusetti N, Pizzo E, Simoni M, Simone L, Cifalà V, Solimando R, Perna B, Testino G, Pellicano R, Caio G, Lungaro L, Caputo F, Zoli G, Merighi A, DE Giorgio R. Efficacy and safety of capsule endoscopy in octogenarian patients: a retrospective study. Minerva Gastroenterol (Torino) 2023; 69:388-395. [PMID: 35708039 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5985.22.03220-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Life expectancy and the number of ultra-octogenarians increased significantly, thus making crucial the appropriateness of several endoscopic procedures in elderly patients. The aim of our study was to provide a retrospective analysis of the efficacy and safety of capsule endoscopy (CE) in patients aged over 80 years. METHODS In this single-centre study, 900 patients underwent capsule endoscopy between 2002 and 2015 for different indications; of these 106 patients aged ≥80 years (group A) and 99 patients aged 40-60 years (control group B) were retrospectively selected. RESULTS Occult gastrointestinal bleeding accounted for 62.1% of all indications for capsule endoscopy in group B, compared to 95.2% in group A (P<0.001). Although not statistically significant, the diagnostic yield was higher in group A (71%) vs. group B (62%). The percentages of reaching the cecum and the median gastric transit time were uniform within the two groups. In contrast, small bowel transit time was longer in group A vs. B. Small bowel preparation was similar in the two groups. The exam was generally well tolerated in both groups, with capsule aspiration being one of the main adverse events, which occurred in two elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS Our data expand previous findings confirming that capsule endoscopy can be performed safely even in very old patients and show that the diagnostic yield is similar to that of younger patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Pezzoli
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Matteo Guarino
- Department of Translational Medicine, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Nadia Fusetti
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Elena Pizzo
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College of London, London, UK
| | - Marzia Simoni
- Epidemiological Unit of CNR Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa, Italy
| | - Loredana Simone
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Viviana Cifalà
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Riccardo Solimando
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Benedetta Perna
- Department of Translational Medicine, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Gianni Testino
- Unit of Addiction and Hepatology, Regional Centre on Alcohol, ASL3 San Martino Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Giacomo Caio
- Department of Translational Medicine, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Lisa Lungaro
- Department of Translational Medicine, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Fabio Caputo
- Department of Translational Medicine, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Giorgio Zoli
- Department of Translational Medicine, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Alberto Merighi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Roberto DE Giorgio
- Department of Translational Medicine, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Skouras T, Sawbridge D, Steel A, Collins P. Aspiration of a small bowel video capsule: a rare complication. BMJ Case Rep 2018; 2018:bcr-2018-224538. [DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2018-224538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
3
|
Rondonotti E. Capsule retention: prevention, diagnosis and management. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2017; 5:198. [PMID: 28567378 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2017.03.15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Capsule retention (CR) has been defined as capsule remaining in the digestive tract for a minimum of two weeks. CR occurs approximately in 2% of all patients undergoing small bowel capsule endoscopy (CE). Prompt diagnosis of CR is important, as it has relevant clinical implications. CR should be suspected in (I) all asymptomatic patients who do not report capsule excretion within 15 days from capsule ingestion; and (II) patients with obstructive or perforation-related symptoms in which the capsule has not been excreted, regardless of the time between the onset of symptoms and capsule ingestion. Abdominal plain X-ray is the preferred test to confirm CR. An abdominal CT scan should be performed, on individual basis, if knowledge of the precise location of the retained capsule is necessary or whenever clinically indicated. Since CR is usually asymptomatic, an initial watchful monitoring is suggested. In inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, a short course of medical therapy may allow capsule excretion. Nevertheless, in long-term CR, some cases of capsule fragmentation, acute obstruction and perforation have been described. Therefore, retrieval of the retained capsule is recommended if asymptomatic CR lasts for long time. A safe capsule retrieval is usually performed by endoscopy, whereas surgery remains a viable alternative if the first is unsuccessful or when clinically indicated. Either Patency Capsule® (PC) or dedicated small bowel cross-sectional imaging techniques have been proposed to prevent CR. Both have pros and cons, but head-to-head comparative studies are lacking.
Collapse
|
4
|
Análisis histórico de la experiencia en cápsula endoscópica de intestino delgado en un hospital terciario español. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2017; 40:70-79. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2016.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2016] [Revised: 03/05/2016] [Accepted: 04/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
5
|
Barkin JA, Barkin JS. Video Capsule Endoscopy: Technology, Reading, and Troubleshooting. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2017; 27:15-27. [PMID: 27908514 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2016.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) has completed the endoscopic visualization of the entire luminal gastrointestinal tract. VCE can be performed in inpatients and outpatients, requires appropriate bowel preparation before the study, and can be administered via oral swallowing or endoscopic device placement into the small bowel based on outlined patient-dependent factors. Current commercially available VCE systems were reviewed and compared for individual features and attributes. This article focuses on preparation for VCE, currently available VCE technology, how to read a VCE study, and risks and contraindications to VCE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jodie A Barkin
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, 1120 North West 14th Street, Clinical Research Building, Suite 1116 (D-49), Miami, FL 33136, USA.
| | - Jamie S Barkin
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, 1120 North West 14th Street, Clinical Research Building, Suite 1116 (D-49), Miami, FL 33136, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Razavi F, Gross S, Katz S. Endoscopy in the elderly: risks, benefits, and yield of common endoscopic procedures. Clin Geriatr Med 2014; 30:133-47. [PMID: 24267608 DOI: 10.1016/j.cger.2013.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
There has been limited research examining the risks, benefits, and use of common endoscopic procedures in the elderly. Furthermore, gastroenterology training programs do not routinely incorporate elderly concerns when dealing with common gastrointestinal issues. There exists a broad array of endoscopic procedures with varying inherent risks that must be weighed with each elderly patient in mind. This article discusses the benefits and drawbacks of the most common procedures and indications for endoscopy including upper endoscopy, colonoscopy, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic ultrasound, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, and deep enteroscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farid Razavi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Langone Medical Center, New York University, 550 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Muhammad A, Vidyarthi G, Brady P. Role of small bowel capsule endoscopy in the diagnosis and management of iron deficiency anemia in elderly: A comprehensive review of the current literature. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:8416-8423. [PMID: 25024599 PMCID: PMC4093694 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i26.8416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2013] [Revised: 01/30/2014] [Accepted: 03/13/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is common and often under recognized problem in the elderly. It may be the result of multiple factors including a bleeding lesion in the gastrointestinal tract. Twenty percent of elderly patients with IDA have a negative upper and lower endoscopy and two-thirds of these have a lesion in the small bowel (SB). Capsule endoscopy (CE) provides direct visualization of entire SB mucosa, which was not possible before. It is superior to push enteroscopy, enteroclysis and barium radiography for diagnosing clinically significant SB pathology resulting in IDA. Angioectasia is one of the commonest lesions seen on the CE in elderly with IDA. The diagnostic yield of CE for IDA progressively increases with advancing age, and is highest among patients over 85 years of age. Balloon assisted enteroscopy is used to treat the lesions seen on CE. CE has some limitations mainly lack of therapeutic capability, inability to provide precise location of the lesion and false positive results. Overall CE is a very safe and effective procedure for the evaluation of IDA in elderly.
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
2013 saw several advances in small bowel endoscopy: new 3D visualization software, increased battery life, side-viewing cameras and higher frame rate. Studies on prokinetics for patient preparation, safety in the elderly, rebleeding after negative capsule endoscopy and defining optimum training requirements for fellows were encouraging. Procedure time and small bowel length evaluated by double-balloon and spiral endoscopy were shown to be comparable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uday C Ghoshal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Raebareli Road, Lucknow 226014, India
| |
Collapse
|