Efficacy and safety of endoscopic radial incision and cutting for benign severe anastomotic stricture after surgery for lower rectal cancer (with video)

Endoscopic Stricturoplasty with Linear Stapler: An Efficient Alternative for the Refractory Rectal Anastomotic Stricture

INTRODUCTION

Symptomatic anastomotic stricture is a rare but major complication after left-sided colorectal surgery. Hydraulic balloon dilatation is the first-line treatment in cases where the complication occurs, but 20% of patients present with refractory strictures after multiple sessions. Endoscopic stricturoplasty with the use of a linear stapler is a novel therapeutic alternative for those difficult cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified all patients in our department who underwent endoscopic stricturoplasty with a linear stapler between 2004 and 2022. The technical, periinterventional, and follow-up data of the patients were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

We identified nine patients who fulfilled our inclusion criteria. The procedure was technically possible in eight cases, whereas in one case, the anatomy of the anastomosis did not allow for a correct placement of the stapler. All patients with a technically successful procedure were relieved from their symptoms and could have their ostomy reversed. There was no periprocedural morbidity and mortality. Two patients presented with a recurrent stricture eight and 26 months after the initial stricturoplasty, and the procedure was successfully repeated in both cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic stricturoplasty is a feasible, safe, and minimally invasive alternative for the treatment of refractory anastomotic strictures in the distal colon and rectum for patients with a suitable anatomy.

Comparison of the Efficacy of Endoscopic Radial Incision and Cutting Procedure and Endoscopic Balloon Dilation for Benign Anastomotic Stricture After Low Anterior Resection Combined With Preventive Loop Ileostomy in Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic radial incision and cutting procedure is a notable technique in the treatment of benign anastomotic strictures after low anterior resection in rectal cancer. However, the efficacy and safety of the endoscopic radial incision and cutting procedure and traditional endoscopic balloon dilation remain unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of the endoscopic radial incision and cutting procedure and endoscopic balloon dilation in patients with anastomotic stricture after low anterior resection.

DESIGN

Rectal cancer patients with anastomotic stricture after low anterior resection combined with synchronous preventive loop ileostomy between January 2014 and June 2021 were retrospectively collected. These patients underwent the endoscopic radial incision and cutting procedure or endoscopic balloon dilation as an initial treatment. The clinicopathological baseline data of the patients, endoscopic surgery success rate, complications, and restricture rate were analyzed.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at Nanfang Hospital in China.

PATIENTS

A total of 30 patients were eligible after reviewing the medical records. Twenty patients underwent endoscopic balloon dilation, and 10 patients underwent endoscopic radial incision and cutting procedure.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The adverse event rate and stricture recurrence rate.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in patient demographics or clinical features. No adverse events occurred in either of the 2 groups. The mean operation time was 18.9 ± 3.6 minutes in the endoscopic balloon dilation group and 10.2 ± 3.3 minutes in the endoscopic radial incision and cutting procedure group ( p < 0.001). The stricture recurrence rates between the endoscopic balloon dilation group and the endoscopic radial incision and cutting procedure group were significantly different (44.4% vs 0%; p = 0.025).

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective study.

CONCLUSIONS

The endoscopic radial incision and cutting procedure is safe and more efficacious than endoscopic balloon dilation for anastomotic stricture after low anterior resection combined with synchronous preventive loop ileostomy in rectal cancer.

Defunctioning stoma and anastomotic stricture in rectal cancer surgery: a propensity score matching study

BACKGROUND

In cases of rectal cancer surgery, patients at high risk of anastomotic leakage often receive a defunctioning stoma (DS). However, its role in postoperative anastomotic strictures (AS) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between DS and AS and outcomes of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) in treating rectal AS.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted from January 2019 to September 2021 and included patients who underwent rectal cancer surgery. A 1:1 ratio was used for propensity score matching (PSM). Univariate analyses were performed to identify statistically significant variables, and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine the factors affecting AS.

RESULTS

This study included 383 patients. The results of the univariate analysis suggested that surgery time (HR 4.597, 95% CI 1.563-13.525, P=0.006), postoperative anastomotic leakage (HR 11.830, 95% CI 3.773-37.094, P<0.001), and DS (HR 15.475, 95% CI 6.042-39.641, P<0.001) were significantly associated with AS. In the multivariate analysis, postoperative anastomotic leakage (HR 7.596, 95% CI 1.987-29.044, P= 0.003) and DS (HR 11.252, 95% CI 4.113-30.779, P<0.001) were identified as significant risk factors for AS. After matching, the univariate analysis revealed that postoperative anastomotic leakage (HR 8.333, 95% CI 1.541-45.052, P= 0.014) and DS (HR 9.965, 95% CI 2.200-45.142, P= 0.003) were associated with AS. The multivariate analysis indicated that postoperative anastomotic leakage (HR 14.549, 95% CI 1.765-119.913, P= 0.013) and DS (HR 12.450, 95% CI 2.418-64.108, P= 0.003) were significant risk factors for AS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence that DS is independently associated with AS, and postoperative anastomotic leakage increases the risk of AS. Furthermore, this study suggests that TEM could be a valuable treatment option for AS.

Nomogram for benign anastomotic stricture after surgery for rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Benign anastomotic stricture remains among the most prevalent complications following surgery for rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE

This study is aimed at identifying risk factors of anastomotic stricture as well as generating an effective nomogram for the stricture.

METHODS

Design: This is a retrospective study.

SETTING

This study was conducted from January 2015 to December 2019 in a single tertiary center for rectal cancer.

PATIENTS

A total of 117 rectal cancer patients after surgery without recurrence were enrolled in this study, of which 39 with anastomotic stricture and 78 without stricture.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Their clinical and pathological data were collected. Multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify risk factors for anastomotic stricture and to generate the nomogram prediction model.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis of the primary cohort led to the identification of LCA (left colic artery) preservation (OR, 0.074; P = 0.0015), protective stoma (OR, 5.353; P = 0.012), anastomotic leakage (OR, 12.027; P = 0.005), and anastomotic distance (OR, 7.578; P = 0.012) as independent risk factors for anastomotic stricture. The following predictive model was derived: Logit (anastomotic stricture) = 0.074∗ LCA + 5.353∗ Protective stoma +12.027∗ Anastomotic leakage + 7.578∗ Anastomotic distance. Assessment of the predictive model revealed that the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.871, while the cutoff value was 15.444 with a sensitivity of 64.1% and a specificity of 94.8%.

LIMITATIONS

The main limitation is the research design of a retrospective and case-controlled study with a small sample size from a single center.

CONCLUSIONS

LCA preservation, protective stoma, anastomotic leakage, and anastomotic distance may affect the occurrence of anastomotic stricture following surgery for rectal cancer. The nomogram model generated in the present study can be valuable in the prediction of anastomotic stricture. This study has been registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.chictr.org.cn/, ChiCTR 2100043775).

Anastomotic occlusion after laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection: a rare case study and literature review

Background

With the development of laparoscopic techniques and the broad clinical application of various anastomotic types, anal-preserving low anterior rectal resection and ultra-low anterior rectal resection have been popularized. Some patients with rectal cancer have retained their anus and improved their quality of life. Nevertheless, the incidence of postoperative anastomotic stenosis remains high, and anastomotic occlusion is even rarer.

Case presentation

We report a case of anastomotic occlusion in a patient with rectal cancer, which occurred after undergoing laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection + prophylactic terminal ileal fistulation at our department. Under endoscopy, we used a small guidewire to break through the occluded anastomosis, thereby finding the lacuna. After endoscopic balloon dilation, digital anal dilatation, and continuous dilator-assisted dilation, the desired efficacy was achieved, ultimately recovering ileal stoma. Postoperative follow-up condition was generally acceptable, without symptoms like abdominal pain, bloating, or difficulty in defecation.

Conclusion

Numerous factors cause postoperative anastomotic stenosis in patients with rectal cancer. Complete occlusion of anastomosis occurs relatively rare in clinical practice, and is challenging to treat. This case was our first attempt to remove the anastomotic occlusion successfully, which avoided re-operation or pain from the permanent fistula.

Endoscopic Stricturotomy for Patients With Postoperative Benign Anastomotic Stricture for Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Postoperative benign anastomotic stricture is associated with colorectal anastomosis following surgery for colorectal cancer. Endoscopic stricturotomy is a novel technique that has been demonstrated to be safe and effective for the treatment of colorectal anastomotic stricture in several case reports and series.

OBJECTIVE

We designed this study to investigate the efficacy of endoscopic stricturotomy for postoperative benign anastomotic stricture in patients for colorectal cancer. The primary outcomes were stricture-recurrence-free survival and reoperation-free survival.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective study.

SETTING

This study presents a single-center experience.

PATIENTS

This retrospective study included patients with colorectal cancer who underwent surgical resection and developed anastomotic stricture between January 2014 and June 2019 and were treated with endoscopic stricturotomy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Immediate technical success of endoscopic stricturotomy and the factors associated with success and recurrence were investigated.

RESULTS

Endoscopic stricturotomy was performed in 57 patients, and immediate technical success was achieved in 84% of the patients. The mean follow-up was 31.3 (15.8) months (range, 9-74 months). Postoperative benign anastomotic stricture recurred in 11 patients after initial successful endoscopic stricturotomy; 10 of the 11 recurrent patients accepted reoperation. Univariate and multivariate analysis indicated that length of stricture ≥1 cm was an independent risk factor for failure of the initial endoscopic stricturotomy (OR, 9.423; 95% CI, 1.729-51.350; p = 0.010) and the recurrence of postoperative benign anastomotic stricture after the initial endoscopic stricturotomy (OR, 13.521; 95% CI, 2.305-79.306; p = 0.004).

LIMITATIONS

The study was limited by its small sample size and retrospective design.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic stricturotomy is a safe and effective technique for postoperative benign anastomotic stricture. However, if the length of the stricture is ≥1 cm, endoscopic stricturotomy may not be effective, and recurrence of postoperative benign anastomotic stricture is also likely. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B739.

ESTRICTUROTOMA ENDOSCPICA PARA PACIENTES CON ESTRICCIN ANASTOMTICA BENIGNA POSTOPERATORIA PARA EL CNCER COLORRECTAL

ANTECEDENTES:La estenosis anastomótica benigna postoperatoria se asocia con anastomosis colorrectal después de la cirugía para el cáncer colorrectal. La estricturotomia endoscópica es una técnica novedosa que se ha demostrado que es segura y efectiva para el tratamiento de la estenosis anastomótica colorrectal en varios informes de casos o series.OBJETIVO:Diseñamos este estudio para investigar la eficacia de la estricturotomia endoscópica para la estenosis anastomótica benigna postoperatoria en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal. El resultado primario fue la supervivencia libre de restricción estricta y la supervivencia libre de reoperación.DISEÑO:Este es un estudio retrospectivo.CONFIGURACIÓN:Este estudio presenta una experiencia de un solo centro.PACIENTES:Este estudio retrospectivo incluyó pacientes con cáncer colorrectal que se sometieron a resección quirúrgica y desarrollaron estenosis anastomótica entre enero de 2014 y junio de 2019 y tratados con estricturotomia endoscópica.MEDIDAS PRINCIPALES DE RESULTADO:Éxito técnico inmediato y estenosurotomía endoscópica, los factores asociados con el éxito y la recurrencia.RESULTADOS:Se realizó estricturotomia endoscópica en 57 pacientes, y se logró un éxito técnico inmediato en el 84% de los pacientes. El seguimiento medio fue de 31,3 (15,8) meses (rango, 9 a 74 meses), el POBAS se repitió en 11 pacientes después del éxito inicial de ESt. 10 de los 11 pacientes recurrentes aceptaron la reoperación. El análisis univariado y multivariado indicó que la longitud de la estenosis ≥1 cm era un factor de riesgo independiente para el fracaso de la estricturotomia endoscópica inicial (odds ratio = 9,423; IC del 95% = 1.729-51.350; p = 0.010) y la recurrencia de estenosis anastomótica benigna postoperatoria después de la estricturotomia endoscópica inicial (odds ratio = 13,521; IC del 95% = 2,305-79,306; p = 0.004).LIMITACIONES:El estudio estuvo limitado por su pequeño tamaño de muestra y diseño retrospectivo.CONCLUSIONES:La estricturotomia endoscópica es una técnica segura y efectiva para la estructura anastomótica benigna postoperatoria. Sin embargo, si la longitud de la estenosis es ≥1 cm, la estricturotomia endoscópica puede no ser efectiva y también es probable que se repita la estenosis anastomótica benigna postoperatoria. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B739.

Management of benign anastomotic strictures following rectal resection: a systematic review

AIM

Benign anastomotic strictures following colorectal surgical resection are a commonly under-reported complication in up to 30% of patients, with a significant impact upon quality of life. In this systematic review, we aim to assess the utility of endoscopic techniques in avoiding the need for surgical reintervention.

METHOD

A literature search was performed for published full text articles using the PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus databases. Additional papers were found by scanning the references of relevant papers.

RESULTS

A total of 34 papers were included, focusing upon balloon dilatation, endoscopic stenting, electroincision, stapler stricturoplasty and cortiocosteroids alone and in combination, with success rates varying from 20% to 100%. The most challenging strictures were reported as those with a narrow lumen, frequently observed following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or an anastomotic leak. Endoscopic balloon dilatation was the most commonly used first-line method; however, repeated dilatations were often required and this was associated with an increased risk of perforation. Although initial success rates for stents were good, patients often experienced stent migration and local symptoms. Only a small number of patients experienced endoscopic management failure and progressed to surgical intervention.

CONCLUSION

Following identification of an anastomotic stricture and exclusion of underlying malignancy, endoscopic management is both safe and feasible as a first-line option, even if multiple treatment exposures or multimodal management is required. Surgical resection or a defunctioning stoma should be reserved for emergency or failed cases. Further research is required into multimodal and novel therapies to improve quality of life for these patients.

Cutting-Edge Technologies for Gastrointestinal Therapeutic Endoscopy

With advancements in the development of flexible endoscopes and endoscopic devices and the increased demand for minimally invasive treatments, the indications of therapeutic endoscopy have been expanded. Methods of endoscopic treatment used for tissue removal, hemostasis, and dilatation are as follows. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is considered the gold standard curative method for removal of gastrointestinal node-negative neoplasms, regardless of their size or the presence of ulcer formation. Laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS), which incorporates ESD, was introduced for removal of lesions in deeper layers. Another technique is endoscopic full-thickness resection, which is challenging without the assistance of laparoscopy. In terms of hemostasis, management of iatrogenic bleeding after endoscopic treatment is an important issue. Shielding methods and suturing techniques have been introduced for large mucosal defects after ESD, and their efficacy has been investigated clinically. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a new alternative surgical approach for minimally invasive treatment of esophageal achalasia. Furthermore, endoscopic fundoplication after POEM was devised to prevent post-POEM gastroesophageal reflux disease. Many endoscopic treatments, including ESD, LECS, and POEM, have been introduced in Japan. With the aging of the population, more attention will be directed toward therapeutic endoscopy for elderly patients, because it is less invasive. Development of endoscopic treatments with expanded indications is expected.

Endoscopic radial incision and cutting technique for treatment-naive stricture of colorectal anastomosis: Two case reports

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic stenosis (AS) after colorectal surgery was treated with balloon dilation, endoscopic procedure or surgery. The endoscopic procedures including dilation, electrocautery incision, or radial incision and cutting (RIC) were preferred because of lower complication rates than surgery and are less invasive. Endoscopic RIC has a greater success rate than dilation methods. Most reports showed that repeated RICs were needed to maintain patency of the anastomosis. We report that single session RIC was applied only to treatment-naive patients with AS.

CASE SUMMARY

Two female patients presented with AS. One patient had advanced rectal cancer and the other had a refractory stenosis following surgery for endometriosis at sigmoid colon. The endoscopic RIC procedure was performed as follows. A single small incision was carefully made to increase the view of the proximal colon and the incision was expanded until the surgical stapling line. Finally, we made a further circumferential excision with endoscopic knife along the inner border of the surgical staple line. At the end of the procedure, the standard colonoscope was able to pass freely through the widened opening. All patients showed improved AS after a single session of RIC without immediate or delayed procedure-related complications. Follow-up colonoscopy at 7 and 8 mo after endoscopic RIC revealed intact anastomotic sites in both patients. No treatment-related adverse events or recurrence of the stenosis was demonstrated during follow-up periods of 20 and 23 mo.

CONCLUSION

The endoscopic RIC may play a role as one of treatment options for treatment-naive AS with short stenotic lengths.

Endoscopic incision for treatment of benign gastrointestinal strictures

INTRODUCTION

Benign gastrointestinal strictures are common, and can be congenital or acquired (anastomotic, corrosive, induced by Crohn's disease or endoscopic treatments, etc.). Patients usually present with stricture-related symptoms such as vomiting, dysphagia, dyschezia, abdominal pain, which impair their quality of life. Endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) is the first-line treatment for most of the benign strictures; however, long-term efficacy is suboptimal, and the recurrence rate can be up to 38%. Endoscopic incision (EI) was firstly reported for treatment of congenital membranous stricture, and then applied to other benign gastrointestinal strictures.

AREA COVERED

In the present review, we provided a comprehensive review of EI for the treatment of benign gastrointestinal strictures, mainly focus on the technical details, indication, safety, and efficacy of EI. The present review is expected to provide tips for operators who are going to perform EI.

EXPERT OPINION

EI can serve as an alternative method for treatment of gastrointestinal strictures, the best indications are congenital membranous stricture and short-segmental (<1 cm) anastomotic strictures refractory to EBD. EI may also be attempted for strictures induced by other reasons. Combination with other endoscopic methods such as EBD, local steroid injection, stent placement, may improve the efficacy of EI.

Endoscopic radial incision and cutting for Crohn's Disease-associated intestinal stricture: a pilot study

Background and study aims  Intestinal stricture associated with Crohn's disease (CD) is usually treated by endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) or stricture plasty. Although EBD is effective and safe for such strictures, refractory stricture after EBD poses a problem. Hence, other novel approaches for these refractory strictures are required. On the other hand, the efficacy of radial incision and cutting (RIC) method for esophageal stricture after esophagogastric surgery is reported. In this pilot study, we adopted the RIC technique for five CD patients with refractory intestinal stricture to dilate their strictures. We conducted the RIC procedure using an electric needle knife with a ceramic tip on the top of the needle. Four cases were of anastomotic stricture after ileocecal resection and the remaining one case was of stricture due to mucosal healing. The RIC procedure was successful for all five patients. Average procedure time was 18.6 minutes. One patient developed delayed bleeding after RIC. There were no cases of perforation. RIC could be an alternative therapy for intestinal stricture associated with CD. Further studies should be conducted to clarify its efficacy and safety.

Inverted "upside-down" esophageal fully-covered self-expanding metal stent is effective for temporary treatment of colorectal strictures: a pilot case series

Background and study aims  Placement of a fully-covered self-expanding metal stent (FC-SEMS) is a valid alternative for benign and malignant colorectal strictures treatment. Despite the reportedly high technical success rate, stenting is still challenging, due to high rates of adverse events. Migration still represents the main issue, although several anti-migration systems have been proposed. Patients and methods  Before insertion, esophageal Beta Niti-S FC-SEMSs were inverted and reloaded on the deployment device to invert the proximal and distal parts of the stent, with the largest end placed above the stricture to contrast peristaltic activity. The inverted "upside-down" Beta Niti-S FC-SEMS was placed in five consecutive patients: four pts with benign anastomotic stricture unresponsive to repeated balloon dilation and persisting for at least 10 weeks, and one with malignant rectal neoplasia. In five patients, six inverted FC-SEMSs were placed. Results  The modified FC-SEMS did not migrate in 5/6 cases (83 %). Stent migration occurred in the neoplastic case, induced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The "upside-down" esophageal Beta Niti-S FC-SEMS stayed in place for an average of 6 weeks, achieving resolution of stricture in all patients but one, who required an additional stent placement, due to incomplete stricture resolution after 6 weeks. Conclusion  The inverted esophageal Beta Niti-S FC-SEMSs proved to be effective in treating colorectal stricture in all cases, with no spontaneous migration or significant side effects, and achieved resolution of strictures where a traditional approach, recommended by guidelines, failed.

Radial incision and cutting method using a transanal approach for treatment of anastomotic strictures following rectal cancer surgery: a case report

Background

Development of an anastomotic stricture following rectal cancer surgery is not uncommon. Such strictures are usually managed by manual or instrumental dilatation techniques that are often insufficiently effective, as evidenced by the high recurrence rate. Various surgical procedures using minimally invasive approaches have also been reported. One of these procedures, endoscopic radial incision and cutting (RIC), has been extensively reported. However, RIC by transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) is yet to be reported. We here report a novel application of TAMIS for performing RIC for anastomotic rectal stenosis.

Case presentation

A 67-year-old man had suffered from constipation for 6 years after undergoing low anterior resection for stage II rectal cancer 7 years ago. Colonoscopy showed a 1-cm diameter stricture in the lower rectum. Balloon dilatation was performed many times because of repeated recurrences. Thus, surgical management was considered and the stricture was successfully excised via a RIC method using a TAMIS approach. Postoperatively, the patient had minimal leakage that resolved with conservative treatment.

Conclusions

A RIC method using a TAMIS approach is an effective minimally invasive means of managing anastomotic strictures following rectal cancer surgery.

Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic radial incision and cutting for severe benign anastomotic stenosis after surgery for colorectal carcinoma: a three-case series

Benign colonic anastomotic stenosis sometimes occurs after surgical resection and usually requires surgical or endoscopic dilation. Limited data are available on the effectiveness and safety of the endoscopic radial incision and cutting (RIC) method at sites other than the esophagus. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of RIC dilation for severe benign anastomotic colonic stenosis. Subjects were 3 men (median age 72 years, range 65 - 76 years) who developed severe benign anastomotic stenosis after surgical resection for colorectal carcinoma and were subsequently treated by RIC dilation at Hiroshima City Asa Citizens Hospital between May 2014 and December 2016. Severe anastomotic stenosis was defined as a narrowed anastomosis through which a standard colonoscope could not be passed. The median interval from surgery to RIC was 21 months (range 9 - 29 months). RIC was successful in all 3 patients and reduced the severity of dyschezia postoperatively; 2 patients experienced improvement after a single RIC session and the other after 6 RIC sessions. No treatment-related adverse events or re-stenosis requiring repeat dilation was noted during a median follow-up of 27 months (range 8 - 37 months). Our findings indicate that the RIC technique can be applied safely and effectively to various sites in the colon, avoiding the need for reoperation.

The Impact of Anastomotic Leakage on Anal Function Following Intersphincteric Resection

BACKGROUND

Data regarding anastomotic leakage (AL) following intersphincteric resection (ISR) are lacking. We aimed to evaluate the effect of AL on anal function in a retrospective review of patients who developed AL following ISR.

METHODS

We evaluated 341 consecutive patients who underwent ISR between 2000 and 2012. Patients were classified into three groups: anastomotic dehiscence (AD), major AL (Clavien-Dindo grade III+), or control (<grade III or no AL). Functional assessment was performed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after defecation through the preserved anus, and the Wexner score was calculated.

RESULTS

Among patients who underwent ISR for low rectal cancer (anal verge, 3.7 ± 1.3 cm), 59 (17%) developed AL. Of these, 13 patients were classified as AD and 36 as major AL. The rate of the 3-year stomal reversal was significantly lower in the major AL (78.6%) and AD groups (61.5%) than in the control group (88.7%; p < 0.01). Furthermore, the anastomotic stricture rate was higher in the AL and AD groups than in the controls (16.7 and 38.5 vs. 1.8%, respectively; p < 0.01). Wexner scores in the major AL group were poor during the early period, but were similar to the control group at the 2-year follow-up. In contrast, Wexner scores in the AD group remained high, even after 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with major AL following ISR had poor anal function that recovered over 2 years, as long as AD was not present. These findings suggest that patients with major AL require a long-term follow-up for anal function.

Endoscopic electrocautery incision therapy for benign lower gastrointestinal tract anastomotic strictures

Benign anastomotic strictures can occur in up to 22% of patients who undergo colonic or rectal resection. Traditionally, surgery was the preferred method of treatment, but, over time, endoscopic techniques, such as balloon dilation, have become the preferred modality. However, a high stricture recurrence rate of up to 18-20% and the increased risk of perforation due to uncontrolled stretching are its major drawbacks. Endoscopic electrocautery incision (EECI) allows for controlled mucosal incision in predetermined locations of stricture. In this meta-analysis, we have summarized case reports, case series, retrospective studies and prospective studies describing the different endoscopic EECI techniques used for benign lower gastrointestinal tract anastomotic strictures. Our analysis showed that EECI, either alone or in combination with other modalities (e.g. balloon dilation, steroid injection or argon plasma coagulation) is an effective treatment option for both treatment-naïve and refractory short non-inflammatory strictures. The overall success rate for EECI-based therapy for benign colorectal stricture was 98.4%, with a stricture recurrence rate of 6.0%. No major adverse event (bleeding, infection or perforation) was reported. Only minor adverse events (abdominal pain) were reported in 3.8% of the population.