Keep calm under pressure: a paradigm shift in managing postsurgical leaks

Endoscopic Management of Surgical Complications of Bariatric Surgery

Bariatric surgery, although highly effective, may lead to several surgical complications like ulceration, strictures, leaks, and fistulas. Newer endoscopic tools have emerged as safe and effective therapeutic options for these conditions. This article reviews post-bariatric surgery complications and the role of endoscopy in their management.

[Bariatric endoscopy-Possibilities and value in obesity medicine and surgery-A separate special field]

Endoscopy has become established as an important component in all preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative areas of bariatric surgery. As guidelines are not yet available, relevant studies and international position papers have been collected in this article. Preoperatively, endoscopy should be performed before sleeve gastrectomy (SG, detection of reflux status) and before bypass procedures (status survey of the postoperatively no longer accessible distal stomach). Routine endoscopic monitoring should be performed 2-3 years after SG and a OAGB (one anastomosis gastric bypass) for recording of the gastroesophageal reflex disease (GERD) status. In the first line complication management of hemorrhage and leakages, endoscopic procedures have prevailed over surgical ones due to more causal therapeutic approaches (except cases of general peritonitis where lavage and drainages are needed). In the treatment of late complications such as dumping, anastomosis dilatation and stenosis, bariatric endoscopy provides versatile, organ-preserving solutions and continues to demonstrate a high degree of innovation. In these postoperative fields of application, especially in the treatment of late complications, specific knowledge of bariatric anatomy and physiology as well as surgical treatment options are required in addition to endoscopic expertise. The special field of bariatric endoscopy has developed and will have an own importance closely linked to the bariatric surgery.

Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy (EVT) for the Treatment of Post-Bariatric Surgery Leaks and Fistulas: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Bariatric surgery remains the most effective treatment for morbid obesity and its comorbidities. However, post-surgical leaks and fistulas can occur in about 1-5% of patients, with challenging treatment approaches. Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) has emerged as a promising tool due to its satisfactory results and accessibility. In this first systematic review and meta-analysis on the subject, EVT revealed rates of 87.2% clinical success, 6% moderate adverse events, and 12.5% system dislodgements, requiring 6.47 EVT system exchanges every 4.39 days, with a dwell time of 25.67 days and a total length of hospitalization of 44.43 days. Although our results show that EVT is a safe and effective therapy for post-surgical leaks and fistulas, they should be interpreted with caution due to the paucity of available data.

Stent Management of Leaks After Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite the low rates of complications of bariatric surgery, gastrointestinal leaks are major adverse events that increase post-operative morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic treatment using self-expanding stents has been used in the therapeutic management of these complications with preliminary good results.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of self-expanding stents placement for the management of gastrointestinal leaks after obesity surgery. Overall proportion of successful leak closure, stent migration, and reoperation were analysed as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes were patients' clinical characteristics, duration and type of stent, other stent complications, and mortality.

RESULTS

A meta-analysis of studies reporting stents was performed, including 488 patients. The overall proportion of successful leak closure was 85.89% (95% CI, 82.52-89.25%), median interval between stent placement and its removal of 44 days. Stent migration was noted in 18.65% (95% CI, 14.32-22.98%) and the overall proportion of re-operation was in 13.54% (95% CI, 9.94-17.14%). The agreement between reviewers for the collected data gave a Cohen's κ value of 1.0. No deaths were caused directly by complications with the stent placement.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic placement of self-expanding stents can be used, in selected patients, for the management of leaks after bariatric surgery with a high rate of effectiveness and low mortality rates. Nevertheless, reducing stent migration and re-operation rates represents an important challenge for future studies.

AGA Clinical Practice Update on Evaluation and Management of Early Complications After Bariatric/Metabolic Surgery: Expert Review

DESCRIPTION

Endoscopic techniques are paramount in the identification and management of complications after surgery, though collaboration with other specialties is obligatory. Unfortunately, the evaluation and treatment algorithms are not standardized and there is a paucity of high-quality prospective studies to provide clarity regarding the best approach. The purpose of this clinical practice update is to apprise the clinician with respect to the endoscopic evaluation and management of patients with early (<90 days) complications after undergoing bariatric/metabolic surgery.

METHODS

The best practice advice outlined in this expert review are based on available published evidence, including observational studies and systematic reviews, and incorporates expert opinion where applicable. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Clinicians performing endoscopic approaches to treat early major postoperative complications should do so in a multidisciplinary manner with interventional radiology and bariatric/metabolic surgery co-managing the patient. Daily communication is advised. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Clinicians embarking on incorporating endoscopic management of bariatric/metabolic surgical complications into their clinical practice should have a comprehensive knowledge of the indications, contraindications, risks, benefits, and outcomes of each of the endoscopic treatment techniques. They should also have knowledge of the risks and benefits of alternative methods such as surgical and interventional radiological based approaches. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: Clinicians incorporating endoscopic management of bariatric/metabolic surgical complications into their clinical practice should have expertise in interventional endoscopy techniques, including but not limited to: using concomitant fluoroscopy, stent deployment and retrieval, managing stenosis, and managing percutaneous drains. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Clinicians should screen all patients undergoing endoscopic management of bariatric/metabolic surgical complications and dietary intolerance for comorbid medical (nutrient deficiencies, infection, pulmonary embolism) and psychological (depression, anxiety) conditions. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: Endoscopic approaches to managing complications of bariatric/metabolic surgery may be considered for patients in the immediate, early and late postoperative periods depending on hemodynamic stability. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: Clinicians incorporating endoscopic management of bariatric/metabolic surgical complications into their clinical practice should have a detailed understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms initiating and perpetuating conditions such as staple-line leaks. This will allow for a prompt diagnosis and appropriate therapy to be targeted not only at the area of interest, but also any concomitant downstream stenosis. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Clinicians should recognize that the goal for endoscopic management of staple-line leaks are often not necessarily initial closure of the leak site, but rather techniques to promote drainage of material from the perigastric collection into the gastric lumen such that the leak site closes by secondary intention.

Endoscopic Double-Pigtail Catheter (EDPC) Internal Drainage as First-Line Treatment of Gastric Leak: A Case Series during Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Learning Curve for Morbid Obesity

OBJECTIVES

The prevalence of morbid obesity has dramatically increased over the last several decades worldwide, currently reaching epidemic proportions. Gastric leak (GL) remains the potentially fatal main complication after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) for morbid obesity. To our knowledge, there are no standardized guidelines for GL treatment after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) yet. The aim of this study was to represent our institutional preliminary experience using the endoscopic double-pigtail catheter (EDPC) as the method of internal drainage and propose it as first-line treatment in case of GL after LSG.

METHODS

One hundred and seventeen patients were admitted to our surgical department and underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) for morbid obesity from March 2014 to June 2019. In 5 patients (4.3%) of our series, GL occurred as a complication of LSG. EPDC was the stand-alone procedure of internal drainage and GL first-line treatment. The internal pig tail was endoscopically removed from 30th to 40th POD in all cases.

RESULTS

Present data (clinical, biochemical, and instrumental tests) showed a complete resolution of GL, with promotion of a pseudodiverticula and complete re-epithelialization of leak. Follow-up was more strict than usual (clinical visit and biochemical test on 7th, 14th, and 21st day after discharge; a CT scan with gastrografin on 30th day from discharge if clinical visit and exams were normal).

CONCLUSION

This was a preliminary retrospective observational study, conducted on 5 patients affected by GL as a complication of LSG for morbid obesity. EDPC maintains the safety, efficacy, and nonexpensive characteristic and may be proposed as better first-line treatment in case of GL after bariatric surgery.

International multicenter expert survey on endoscopic treatment of upper gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks

Background and study aims  A variety of endoscopic techniques are currently available for treatment of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) anastomotic leaks; however, no definite consensus exists on the most appropriate therapeutic approach. Our aim was to explore current management of UGI anastomotic leaks. Methods  A survey questionnaire was distributed among international expert therapeutic endoscopists regarding management of UGI anastomotic leaks. Results  A total of 44 % of 163 surveys were returned; 69 % were from gastroenterologists and 56 % had > 10 years of experience. A third of respondents treat between 10 and 19 patients annually. Fifty-six percent use fully-covered self-expandable metal stents as their usual first option; 80% use techniques to minimize migration; 4 weeks was the most common reported stent dwell time. Sixty percent perform epithelial ablation prior to over-the-scope-clip placement or suturing. Regarding endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT), 56 % perform balloon dilation and intracavitary EVT in patients with large cavities but small leak defects. Regarding endoscopic septotomy, 56 % consider a minimal interval of 4 weeks from surgery and 90 % consider the need to perform further sessions. Regarding endoscopic internal drainage (EID), placement of two stents and shorter stents is preferred. Persistent inflammation with clinical sepsis was the definition most commonly reported for endoscopic failure. EVT/stent placement and EVT/EID were the therapeutic options most often chosen in patients with previous oncologic surgery and previous bariatric surgery, respectively. Conclusions  There is a wide variation in the management of patients with UGI anastomotic leaks. Future prospective studies are needed to move from an expert- to evidence- and personalization-based care.

Role of endoscopic vacuum therapy, internal drainage, and stents for postbariatric leaks

Background and Aims

Therapeutic endoscopy plays a major role in the management of postbariatric anastomotic leaks, offering an effective treatment alternative to repeated surgery. In recent years, management has been moving from bridging and closing the leak’s orifice toward an approach that uses vacuum therapy or internal drainage. Our aim was to demonstrate different treatment options for the management of postbariatric leaks.

Methods

We describe 3 different endoscopic techniques for postbariatric leaks in 2 patients who had undergone Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and 1 patient who had undergone sleeve gastrectomy.

Results

The first patient had a 20-mm early post-RYGB leak with an intra-abdominal associated collection treated with 5 sessions of endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT). The second patient had a 12-mm acute postgastric sleeve leak with an associated collection, in whom therapy with EVT had failed, and who was then treated with endoscopic internal drainage (EID). The last patient had a chronic intra-abdominal collection after RYGB, despite reoperation, in whom therapy with EID and esophageal stent had failed, and who was treated with a diabolo-shaped lumen-apposing metal stent placed between the gastric pouch and the gastric remnant. Weight-loss intention was not compromised in any patient. All patients remain well.

Conclusions

Staple-line or anastomotic leaks are an important cause of morbidity and mortality after surgery. There are myriad endoscopic techniques, with varying reported efficacy. Often, more than one endoscopic approach can be used concomitantly, whereas in other cases, therapies are applied sequentially depending on the initial clinical response. Multiple therapeutic options should be considered before endoscopic failure.

[Endoscopic management of complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy]

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is currently the most commonly performed standalone bariatric procedure worldwide. Gastric staple line leakage is the feared immanent complication of the operation, which is difficult to treat and often persists. This article presents the endoscopic treatment options for complications after laparoscopic SG, particularly the treatment of gastric staple line leakage. Most important for a successful treatment is the understanding of the underlying pathophysiological causes, the exact surgical comprehension of the procedure and advanced endoscopic skills. The choice of endoscopic intervention depends on the available strategies as well as on the skills of the executing endoscopist. Currently, internal drainage seems to be the most expedient method.