1
|
Eluri S, Cotton CC, Kaul V, McKinley M, Pleskow D, Nishioka N, Hoffman B, Nieto J, Tsai F, Coyle W, Kothari S, Joshi V, Dumot J, Greenwald B, Habr FG, Shaheen NJ. Liquid nitrogen spray cryotherapy for eradication of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus: results from a multicenter prospective registry. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 100:200-209. [PMID: 38272279 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.01.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Revised: 12/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Liquid nitrogen spray cryotherapy (SCT) is an alternative to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for eradication of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE). We aimed to assess the safety, efficacy, and durability of SCT in a multicenter U.S. registry. METHODS This is a multicenter prospective registry of adults with BE treated with truFreeze Spray Cryotherapy (Steris, Mentor, Ohio, USA) (4 community and 11 academic sites, 2013-2022). Complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CEIM) and dysplasia (CED) were assessed in BE with dysplasia or intramucosal adenocarcinoma. Kaplan-Meier analysis of CEIM and CED was performed. Hazard ratios for CEIM stratified by baseline risk factors were calculated. RESULTS Among 138 subjects with low-grade dysplasia (24%), high-grade dysplasia (49%), and intramucosal adenocarcinoma (27%), 34% received prior RFA therapy. Subjects received a median of 2 SCT sessions. Adverse events were uncommon, with 5.5% reporting strictures and 0.7% a perforation. Rates of CEIM and CED, respectively, were 66% and 84% after 2 years and 67% and 92% after 3 years. In RFA-naïve patients, CEIM was 77% and CED was 96% at 3 years. Increasing BE length (per centimeter: adjusted hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.96) and prior treatment with RFA (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.69) were associated with a lower rate of CEIM. Recurrence occurred in 8.8% (n = 6) at a mean follow-up of 2.5 years after CEIM. CONCLUSION In this largest reported prospective cohort, liquid nitrogen SCT was safe and effective for the treatment of dysplastic and neoplastic BE. Response was lower in those with prior failed RFA; in that cohort, approximately 50% attained CEIM at 3 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swathi Eluri
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
| | - Cary C Cotton
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Vivek Kaul
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Matthew McKinley
- Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, Hempstead, New York, USA
| | - Douglas Pleskow
- Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Norman Nishioka
- Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Brenda Hoffman
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Jose Nieto
- Borland Groover Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | | | | | - Shivangi Kothari
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Virendra Joshi
- Louisiana State University Medical Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
| | - John Dumot
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Bruce Greenwald
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Nicholas J Shaheen
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rubenstein JH, Sawas T, Wani S, Eluri S, Singh S, Chandar AK, Perumpail RB, Inadomi JM, Thrift AP, Piscoya A, Sultan S, Singh S, Katzka D, Davitkov P. AGA Clinical Practice Guideline on Endoscopic Eradication Therapy of Barrett's Esophagus and Related Neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2024; 166:1020-1055. [PMID: 38763697 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) can be effective in eradicating BE and related neoplasia and has greater risk of harms and resource use than surveillance endoscopy. This clinical practice guideline aims to inform clinicians and patients by providing evidence-based practice recommendations for the use of EET in BE and related neoplasia. METHODS The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework was used to assess evidence and make recommendations. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients, conducted an evidence review, and used the Evidence-to-Decision Framework to develop recommendations regarding the use of EET in patients with BE under the following scenarios: presence of (1) high-grade dysplasia, (2) low-grade dysplasia, (3) no dysplasia, and (4) choice of stepwise endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or focal EMR plus ablation, and (5) endoscopic submucosal dissection vs EMR. Clinical recommendations were based on the balance between desirable and undesirable effects, patient values, costs, and health equity considerations. RESULTS The panel agreed on 5 recommendations for the use of EET in BE and related neoplasia. Based on the available evidence, the panel made a strong recommendation in favor of EET in patients with BE high-grade dysplasia and conditional recommendation against EET in BE without dysplasia. The panel made a conditional recommendation in favor of EET in BE low-grade dysplasia; patients with BE low-grade dysplasia who place a higher value on the potential harms and lower value on the benefits (which are uncertain) regarding reduction of esophageal cancer mortality could reasonably select surveillance endoscopy. In patients with visible lesions, a conditional recommendation was made in favor of focal EMR plus ablation over stepwise EMR. In patients with visible neoplastic lesions undergoing resection, the use of either endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection was suggested based on lesion characteristics. CONCLUSIONS This document provides a comprehensive outline of the indications for EET in the management of BE and related neoplasia. Guidance is also provided regarding the considerations surrounding implementation of EET. Providers should engage in shared decision making based on patient preferences. Limitations and gaps in the evidence are highlighted to guide future research opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel H Rubenstein
- Center for Clinical Management Research, Lieutenant Colonel Charles S. Kettles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Barrett's Esophagus Program, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Cancer Control and Population Sciences Program, Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
| | - Tarek Sawas
- Division of Digestive and Liver Disease, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Swathi Eluri
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Shailendra Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia; Advanced Center for Endoscopy, West Virginia University Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Apoorva K Chandar
- Digestive Health Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - John M Inadomi
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Aaron P Thrift
- Section of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Shahnaz Sultan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Siddharth Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - David Katzka
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Perica Davitkov
- Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; Division of Gastroenterology, Veterans Affairs Northeast Ohio Healthcare System, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yoo JW, Laszkowska M, Mendelsohn RB. The Role of Screening and Early Detection in Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2024; 38:693-710. [PMID: 38431494 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2024.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
Upper gastrointestinal cancers are among the leading causes of cancer deaths worldwide with exceptionally poor prognosis, which is largely attributable to frequently delayed diagnosis. Although effective screening is critical for early detection, the highly variable incidence of upper gastrointestinal cancers presents challenges, rendering universal screening programs suboptimal in most populations globally. Optimal strategies in regions of modest incidence, such as the United States, require a targeted approach, focused on high-risk individuals based on demographic, familial, and clinicopathologic risk factors. Assessment of underlying precancerous lesions has key implications for risk stratification and informing clinical decisions to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Woo Yoo
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| | - Monika Laszkowska
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Robin B Mendelsohn
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wani S. Approach to patients with positive vertical margins after endoscopic resection of Barrett's neoplasia. Endoscopy 2024. [PMID: 38714202 DOI: 10.1055/a-2305-6498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/09/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fockens KN, Jukema JB, Jong MR, Boers T, van der Putten JA, Kusters CHJ, Pouw RE, Duits LC, van der Sommen F, de With PH, de Groof AJ, Bergman JJ. The use of a real-time computer-aided detection system for visible lesions in the Barrett's esophagus during live endoscopic procedures: a pilot study (video). Gastrointest Endosc 2024:S0016-5107(24)00228-1. [PMID: 38604297 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS This pilot study evaluated the performance of a recently developed computer-aided detection (CADe) system for Barrett's neoplasia during live endoscopic procedures. METHODS Fifteen patients with a visible lesion and 15 without were included in this study. A CAD-assisted workflow was used that included a slow pullback video recording of the entire Barrett's segment with live CADe assistance, followed by CADe-assisted level-based video recordings every 2 cm of the Barrett's segment. Outcomes were per-patient and per-level diagnostic accuracy of the CAD-assisted workflow, in which the primary outcome was per-patient in vivo CADe sensitivity. RESULTS In the per-patient analyses, the CADe system detected all visible lesions (sensitivity 100%). Per-patient CADe specificity was 53%. Per-level sensitivity and specificity of the CADe assisted workflow were 100% and 73%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In this pilot study, detection by the CADe system of all potentially neoplastic lesions in Barrett's esophagus was comparable to that of an expert endoscopist. Continued refinement of the system may improve specificity. External validation in larger multicenter studies is planned. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT05628441.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiki N Fockens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jelmer B Jukema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn R Jong
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tim Boers
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Joost A van der Putten
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Carolus H J Kusters
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Roos E Pouw
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lucas C Duits
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Fons van der Sommen
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Peter H de With
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - A Jeroen de Groof
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jacques J Bergman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Eisner DC. Esophageal cancer: Treatment advances and need for screening. JAAPA 2024; 37:19-24. [PMID: 38484297 DOI: 10.1097/01.jaa.0001007328.84376.da] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Esophageal cancer is a challenging malignancy that often is diagnosed in advanced stages, resulting in a poor prognosis. This article provides a comprehensive review of the two main types of esophageal cancer, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and esophageal adenocarcinoma, and reviews epidemiology, risk factors, pathogenesis, diagnostic modalities, staging systems, and established and emerging treatments. Recent advancements in treatment for resectable and unresectable esophageal cancer also are explored. These include immunotherapy, targeted therapy, sentinel lymph node mapping, radiogenomics, palliative measures, and screening measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel C Eisner
- Daniel C. Eisner is the owner of Systolica LLC, consulting and medical supplies, based in Bel Air, Md. The author has disclosed no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gomes ILC, de Moura DTH, Ribeiro IB, Marques SB, de Sousa Carlos A, Nunes BCM, Hirsch BS, de Oliveira GHP, Trasolini RP, Bernardo WM, de Moura EGH. Cryotherapy versus radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus with or without early esophageal neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Endosc 2024; 57:181-190. [PMID: 38229440 PMCID: PMC10984752 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2023.065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the first-line therapy for dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE). Therefore, cryotherapy has emerged as an alternative treatment option. This study aimed to compare the efficacies of these two techniques based on the rates of complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) and dysplasia (CE-D). Adverse events and recurrence have also been reported. METHODS An electronic search was conducted using the Medline (PubMed), Embase, LILACS, and Google Scholar databases until December 2022. Studies were included comparing cryotherapy and RFA for treating dysplastic BE with or without early esophageal neoplasia. This study was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS Three retrospective cohort studies involving 627 patients were included. Of these, 399 patients underwent RFA, and 228 were treated with cryotherapy. There was no difference in CE-IM (risk difference [RD], -0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.25 to 0.19; p=0.78; I2=86%) as well as in CE-D (RD, -0.03; 95% CI, -0.15 to 0.09; p=0.64; I2=70%) between the groups. The absolute number of adverse events was low, and there was no difference in the recurrence rate. CONCLUSION Cryotherapy and RFA were equally effective in treating dysplastic BE, with or without early esophageal neoplasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Igor Logetto Caetité Gomes
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Igor Braga Ribeiro
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Sérgio Barbosa Marques
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Alexandre de Sousa Carlos
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Bruno Salomão Hirsch
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Roberto Paolo Trasolini
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Wanderley Marques Bernardo
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mann DR, Engelhardt KE, Gibney BC, Batten ME, Klipsch EC, Mukherjee R, Bostock IC. Defining Pathologic Upstaging in cT1b Esophageal Cancer: Should We Consider Neoadjuvant Therapy? J Surg Res 2024; 295:61-69. [PMID: 37992454 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NCRT) for cT1b esophageal cancer is not recommended despite the risk of pathologic upstaging with increased depth of penetration. We aimed to (1) define the rate of and factors associated with pathologic upstaging, (2) describe current trends in treatments, and (3) compare overall survival (OS) with and without NCRT for surgically resected cT1b lesions. METHODS We used the 2020 National Cancer Database to identify patients with cT1b N0 esophageal cancer with or without pathologic upstaging who underwent removal of their tumor. We built multivariable logistic regression models to assess factors associated with pathologic upstaging. Survival was compared using log-rank analysis and modeled using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regressions. RESULTS Out of 1106 patients with cT1b esophageal cancer, 17.3% (N = 191) had pathologic upstaging. A higher tumor grade (P = 0.002), greater tumor size (P < 0.001), and presence of lympho-vascular invasion (P < 0.001) were associated with pathologic upstaging. 8.0% (N = 114) of patients were treated with NCRT. Five-y OS was 49.4% for patients who received NCRT compared to 67.2% for upfront esophagectomy (P < 0.05). Pathologic upstaging was associated with decreased OS (pathologic upstaging 43.7% versus no pathologic upstaging 67.7%) (hazard ratio 2.12 [95% confidence interval, 1.70-2.65; P < 0.001]). Compared to esophagectomy, endoscopic local tumor excision was associated with a decreased OS (hazard ratio 1.50 [95% confidence interval, 1.19-1.89; P = 0.001]). CONCLUSIONS Pathologic upstaging of cT1b lesions is associated with decreased OS. Esophagectomy is associated with a survival benefit over endoscopic local tumor excision for these lesions. NCRT is not associated with an increase in OS in cT1b lesions compared to upfront esophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David R Mann
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Kathryn E Engelhardt
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Barry C Gibney
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Macelyn E Batten
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Eric C Klipsch
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Rupak Mukherjee
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Ian C Bostock
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kim SE, Schlottmann F, Masrur MA. Management of Long-Segment Barrett's Esophagus. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2023; 33:1201-1210. [PMID: 37796531 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2023.0321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a common gastrointestinal disorder with one of its most feared complications being Barrett's esophagus (BE). Currently, most of the recommendations of BE management are driven by the level of dysplasia. However, the length of BE might also be related to the risk of dysplasia/malignant transformation. We aimed to determine the appropriate management of BE based on its length. Materials and Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted with searches made on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Long-segment BE (LSBE) was defined as 3 cm or longer and short-segment BE (SSBE) as under 3 cm. Studies evaluating the behavior and management of SSBE and/or LSBE were included for analysis. Results: LSBE have greater risk of dysplasia or progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma compared to SSBE. Despite this greater risk, LSBE and SSBE are currently managed similarly based on the presence and degree of dysplasia. Endoscopic and ablative techniques may have higher level of success and less complications in SSBE, compared to LSBE. Decreasing time interval between surveillance may be a viable option for managing LSBE. Conclusions: Although many algorithms of monitoring and treatment of BE remain the same regardless of segment length, current evidence suggests that more aggressive management for LSBE might be needed due to its higher risk of malignant progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Kim
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Francisco Schlottmann
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Mario A Masrur
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Smith ZL, Thorgerson AM, Dawson AZ, Wani S. Incidence of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, Mortality, and Esophagectomy in Barrett's Esophagus Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Eradication Therapy. Dig Dis Sci 2023; 68:4439-4448. [PMID: 37863992 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-023-08107-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) is the preferred treatment for Barrett's esophagus (BE)-related neoplasia patients. However, the impact of EET on critical outcomes, outside of clinical trials and registry data, remains scarcely studied. We aimed to assess real-world practice patterns and clinical outcomes among BE patients undergoing EET. METHODS TriNetX is a large research network comprising linked inpatient and outpatient electronic-health record-derived data from over 80,000,000 patients. Patients with a diagnosis of BE from 2015 to 2020 were identified and included if they underwent EET during the study period. The primary outcome was the progression to EAC after index EET. Secondary outcomes included rate of esophagectomy, and all-cause mortality. All outcomes were stratified by baseline histology. The incidence of EAC and all-cause mortality were reported in person-years and adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS A total of 4114 patients were analyzed. Distribution of baseline histology was as follows: NDBE (11.8%), LGD (21.4%), HGD (26.4%), EAC (20.8%), and unspecified (19.6%). The total incidence of EAC after index EET was 6.01 per 1000 person-years (PY) for the entire cohort with the highest rate in HGD patients (12.9/1000 PY). The incidence of all-cause mortality was 13.23 per 1000 PY with the highest rates in EAC patients (25.1 per 1000 PY). Rates of esophagectomy were < 1% for all grades of dysplasia. CONCLUSION The results of this study provide "real-world" data on critical outcomes for BE patients undergoing EET, demonstrating a low risk of incident EAC, all-cause mortality, and need for esophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary L Smith
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Abigail M Thorgerson
- Center for Advancing Population Science, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Aprill Z Dawson
- Center for Advancing Population Science, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Mail Stop F735, 1635 Aurora Court, Rm 2.031, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Knabe M, Wetzka J, Welsch L, Richl J, Michael F, Blößer S, Heilani M, Kronsbein H, May A. Radiofrequency ablation versus hybrid argon plasma coagulation in Barrett's esophagus: a prospective randomised trial. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:7803-7811. [PMID: 37605011 PMCID: PMC10520130 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10313-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and hybrid argon plasma coagulation (H-APC) are established thermal ablation techniques for eradicating Barrett's esophagus after endoscopic resection. This study aimed to compare RFA with H-APC in relation to safety, effectiveness and eradication rates. METHODS After endoscopic resection, patients were randomly assigned to H-APC or RFA. A simplified H-APC technique was applied at 60 W. RFA was used with a 90° focal catheter and a simplified protocol of 12 J/cm2 × 3 or with a Halo 360° balloon and 10 J/cm2/cleaning/10 J/cm2. Eradication rates and adverse events were recorded. Patients received follow-up examinations after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. RESULTS One hundred and one patients were finally included in the study (RFA N = 47, H-APC N = 54). The median follow-up period for short-term was 6.0 (CI 5.4-6.9) months and for long term 21 (CI 19.2.5-22.7) months. In total 211 ablations were performed. The eradication rates after long-term follow-up were 74.2% in the RFA group and 82.9% in the H-APC group. Post-interventional pain was significantly greater in the RFA group, with a mean score of 4.56/10 and duration of 7.54 days, in comparison with a mean score of 2.07/10 over 3.59 days in the H-APC group. Stenoses requiring intervention were noted in 3.7% of patients in the H-APC arm and 14.9% of those in the RFA arm. CONCLUSIONS Both ablation techniques have good results in relation to the eradication rate, with a slightly better outcome in the H-APC group. The severity and duration of pain were significantly greater in the RFA group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mate Knabe
- Department of Gastroenterology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| | - Jens Wetzka
- Department of Medicine I, Asklepios Paulinen Klinik Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Lukas Welsch
- Department of Gastroenterology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Johannes Richl
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sana Klinikum GmbH Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Florian Michael
- Department of Gastroenterology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Sandra Blößer
- Department of Medicine I, Asklepios Paulinen Klinik Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Myriam Heilani
- Department of Gastroenterology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Holger Kronsbein
- Department of Gastroenterology, Facility Bielefeld-Bethel, University Hospital Ostwestfalen-Lippe, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Andrea May
- Department of Medicine I, Asklepios Paulinen Klinik Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Desai M. Ki-67 overexpression for risk stratification of early dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus: Friend or foe? Dis Esophagus 2023; 36:doac079. [PMID: 36336914 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doac079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Madhav Desai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Federici C, Callea G, Testoni PA, Costamagna G, Trentino P, Repici A. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients With Barrett Esophagus and High-Grade Dysplasia or Low-Grade Dysplasia. Clin Ther 2023:S0149-2918(23)00136-4. [PMID: 37137786 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Clinical guidelines recommend radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for eradication of Barrett esophagus in patients with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) and high-grade dysplasia (HGD), but evidence on whether RFA provides good value for money is still sparse. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of RFA in Italy. METHODS A Markov model was used to estimate lifelong costs and consequences of disease progression with different treatments. RFA was compared with esophagectomy in the HGD group or endoscopic surveillance in the LGD group. Clinical and quality-of-life parameters were derived from a review of the literature and expert opinions, whereas Italian national tariffs were used as a proxy for costs. FINDINGS RFA dominated esophagectomy in patients with HGD with a probability of 83%. For patients with LGD, RFA was more effective and more costly than active surveillance (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, €6276 per quality-adjusted life-year). At a cost-effectiveness threshold of €15,272, the probability of RFA being the optimal strategy in this population was close to 100%. Model results were sensitive to the cost of the interventions and utility weights used in the different disease states. IMPLICATIONS RFA is likely to be the optimal choice for patients with LGD and HGD in Italy. Italy is discussing the implementation of a national program for the health technology assessment of medical devices, requiring more studies to prove value for money of emerging technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Federici
- SDA Bocconi School of Management, Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), Milan, Italy.
| | - Giuditta Callea
- SDA Bocconi School of Management, Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), Milan, Italy
| | - Pier Alberto Testoni
- Division of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Guido Costamagna
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli - IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Center for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training (CERTT), Università Cattolica, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Repici
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Triggs JR, Krogh K, Simon V, Krause A, Kaplan JB, Yang GY, Wani S, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino J, Komanduri S. Novel histologic score predicts recurrent intestinal metaplasia after successful endoscopic eradication therapy. Dis Esophagus 2023; 36:doac078. [PMID: 36446594 PMCID: PMC10150172 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doac078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 09/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) is an effective treatment for Barrett's esophagus (BE); however, disease recurrence remains problematic requiring surveillance post-treatment. While data regarding predictors of recurrence are limited, uncontrolled reflux may play a significant role. Our aim was to develop a scoring system based on histopathologic reflux in surveillance biopsies following EET to identify patients at high risk for recurrence of BE. Patients were identified from two centers in the treatment with resection and endoscopic ablation techniques for BE consortium. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides of surveillance biopsies post-EET were assessed for histologic changes associated with reflux from a cohort of patients who also underwent pH-metry (derivation cohort). We developed a novel scoring system (Recurrent Epithelial Changes from Uncontrolled Reflux [RECUR]) composed of dilated intercellular spaces, epithelial ballooning, basal cell hyperplasia, and parakeratosis, to identify patients with abnormal esophageal acid exposure. This scoring system was then used to grade surveillance biopsies from patients with or without recurrence of BE following EET (validation cohort). Of 41 patients in the derivation cohort, 19.5% had abnormal acid exposure times (AET) while on proton pump inhibitor therapy. The mean (SD) RECUR score for patients with AET <4% was 4.0 (1.6), compared with 5.5 (0.9) for AET ≥4% (P = 0.015). In the validation cohort consisting of 72 patients without recurrence and 64 patients with recurrence following EET, the RECUR score was the only significant predictor of recurrence (odds ratio: 1.36, 95% confidence interval: 1.10-1.69, P = 0.005). Histologic grading of surveillance biopsies using the RECUR scoring system correlates with BE recurrence following EET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph R Triggs
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Katrina Krogh
- Department of Pathology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Violette Simon
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Amanda Krause
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jeffrey B Kaplan
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Guang-Yu Yang
- Department of Pathology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Peter J Kahrilas
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - John Pandolfino
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Srinadh Komanduri
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Iyer PG, Chak A. Surveillance in Barrett's Esophagus: Challenges, Progress, and Possibilities. Gastroenterology 2023; 164:707-718. [PMID: 36746210 PMCID: PMC10079619 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.01.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's esophagus, aiming to detect prevalent dysplasia and adenocarcinoma, followed by effective endoscopic treatment, is an integral part of the esophageal adenocarcinoma prevention paradigm. However, several limitations, such as the subtle appearance of dysplasia, sampling error (inherent in current surveillance protocols), and noncompliance with surveillance recommendations, lead to missed dysplasia and neoplasia, reducing the effectiveness of surveillance as currently practiced. Careful endoscopic assessment with high-resolution white-light endoscopy, dye-based or electronic chromoendoscopy, and comprehensive sampling of the BE mucosa, remains the cornerstone of endoscopic surveillance. Emerging innovations in this area span the gamut of more efficient sampling methods, advanced imaging tools, artificial intelligence, and molecular marker-powered approaches as adjuncts, to identify prevalent and predict incident dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. Development and implementation of validated quality indicators will allow additional advancement of this critical field. These approaches will hopefully enable efficient and effective cancer prevention and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prasad G Iyer
- Barrett's Esophagus Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | - Amitabh Chak
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sharma P, Falk GW, Bhor M, Ozbay AB, Latremouille-Viau D, Guérin A, Shi S, Elvekrog MM, Limburg P. Real-world upper endoscopy utilization patterns among patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett esophagus, and Barrett esophagus-related esophageal neoplasia in the United States. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e33072. [PMID: 36961193 PMCID: PMC10036066 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000033072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023] Open
Abstract
This study fills a gap in literature by providing contemporary real-world evidence on the prevalence of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), Barrett esophagus (BE), and Barrett esophagus-related neoplasia (BERN) and their upper endoscopy utilization patterns in the United States. A retrospective cohort study design was used: adults with GERD, nondysplastic Barrett esophagus (NDBE), and BERN (indefinite for dysplasia [IND], low-grade dysplasia [LGD], high-grade dysplasia [HGD], or esophageal adenocarcinoma [EAC]) were identified from the MarketScan databases (January 01, 2015-December 31, 2019). For each disease stage, prevalence of adults in commercial claims by calendar year, annual number of upper endoscopies per patient and time between upper endoscopies were reported. In 2019, in commercial claims (N = 12,363,227), the annual prevalence rate of GERD was 13.7% and 0.70% for BE/BERN, among which, 87.1% had NDBE, 6.8% had IND, 2.3% had LGD, 1.0% had HGD, and 2.8% had EAC. From 2015-2019, the study included 3,310,385 patients with GERD, 172,481 with NDBE, 11,516 with IND, 4332 with LGD, 1549 with HGD, and 11,676 with EAC. Annual mean number of upper endoscopies was 0.20 per patient for GERD, 0.37 per patient for NDBE, 0.43 for IND, 0.58 for LGD, and 0.87 for HGD. Median time (months) to second upper endoscopy was 38.10 for NDBE, 36.63 for IND, 22.63 for LGD, and 11.90 for HGD. Upper endoscopy utilization increased from GERD to BE to BERN, and time between upper endoscopies decreased as the disease stage progressed from BE to BERN, with less frequent utilization in BERN than what would be expected from guideline recommendations for surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prateek Sharma
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Kansas School of Medicine and VA Medical Center, Kansas City, MO
| | - Gary W. Falk
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zagari RM, Iascone V, Fuccio L, Panarese A, Frazzoni L. Management of Barrett's Esophagus: Practice-Oriented Answers to Clinical Questions. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15071928. [PMID: 37046590 PMCID: PMC10093467 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15071928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Barrett's esophagus is the most important complication of gastro-esophageal reflux disease and the only known precursor of esophageal adenocarcinoma. The diagnosis and treatment of Barrett's esophagus are clinically challenging as it requires a high level of knowledge and competence in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. For instance, endoscopists should know when and how to perform biopsies when Barrett's esophagus is suspected. Furthermore, the correct identification and treatment of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus is crucial to prevent progression to cancer as well as it is the endoscopic surveillance of treated patients. Herein, we report practice-oriented answers to clinical questions that clinicians should be aware of when approaching patients with Barrett's esophagus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rocco Maurizio Zagari
- Department of Digestive Diseases, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Veronica Iascone
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Fuccio
- Department of Digestive Diseases, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Alba Panarese
- Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Department of Medical Sciences, Central Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera, 74100 Taranto, Italy
| | - Leonardo Frazzoni
- Department of Digestive Diseases, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Davis C, Kolb JM. Management of Post Ablative Barrett's Esophagus: a Review of Current Practices and Look at Emerging Technologies. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN GASTROENTEROLOGY 2023; 21:125-137. [PMID: 37284351 PMCID: PMC9999319 DOI: 10.1007/s11938-023-00414-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023]
Abstract
Purpose of review Endoscopic eradication therapy is an effective and durable treatment for Barrett's esophagus (BE) related neoplasia, but even after achieving successful eradication, these patients remain at risk for recurrence and require ongoing routine examinations. The optimal surveillance protocol including endoscopic technique, sampling strategy, and timing are still being refined. The aim of this review is to discuss current management principles for the post ablation patient and emerging technologies to guide clinical practice. Recent findings There is increasing evidence to support less frequent surveillance exams in the first year after complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia and a move towards targeted biopsies of visible lesions and sampling high-risk locations such as the gastroesophageal junction. Promising technologies on the horizon that could impact management include novel biomarkers, personalized surveillance intervals, and non-endoscopic approaches. Summary Ongoing high-quality examinations after endoscopic eradication therapy are key to limiting recurrent BE. Surveillance intervals should be based on the pretreatment grade of dysplasia. Future research should focus on technologies and surveillance practices that are most efficient for patients and the healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Davis
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA
| | - Jennifer M Kolb
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Parenteral Nutrition, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 11301 Wilshire Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90073 USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lee C, Hayat U, Song K, Gravely AA, Mesa H, Peltola J, Iwamoto C, Manivel C, Bilal M, Shaheen N, Shaukat A, Hanson BJ. A Consensus Diagnosis Utilizing Surface KI-67 Expression as an Ancillary Marker in Low-Grade Dysplasia Helps Identify Patients at High Risk of Progression to High-Grade Dysplasia and Esophaegal Adenocarcinoma. Dis Esophagus 2023; 36:doac065. [PMID: 36190180 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doac065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) develops in a step-wise manner, from low-grade dysplasia (LGD) to high-grade dysplasia (HGD), and ultimately to invasive EAC. However, there remains diagnostic uncertainty about LGD and its risk of progression to HGD/EAC. The aim is to investigate the role of Ki-67, immune-histochemical marker of proliferation, surface expression in patients with confirmed LGD, and risk stratify progression to HGD/EAC. A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Patients with confirmed LGD and indefinite for dysplasia (IND), with a mean follow-up of ≥1 year, were included. Pathology specimens were stained for Ki-67 and analyzed for evidence of surface expression. Our results reveal that 29% of patients with confirmed LGD who stained positive with Ki-67 progressed to HGD/EAC as opposed to none (0%) of the patients who stained negative, a statistically significant result (P = 0.003). Similarly, specimens from patients with IND were stained and analyzed revealing a nonsignificant trend toward a higher rate of progression for Ki-67 positive cases versus Ki-67 negative, 30% versus 21%, respectively. Ki-67 expression by itself can identify patients with LGD at a high risk of progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Lee
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, MN, USA
| | - Umar Hayat
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Minnesota & Veterans Administration Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Kevin Song
- Department of Gastroenterolgoy, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Amy A Gravely
- Department of Research, Veterans Administration Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Hector Mesa
- Department of Pathology, Indiana University Medical School, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Justin Peltola
- Department of Pathology, Veterans Administration Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Carlos Iwamoto
- Department of Pathology, Veterans Administration Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Carlos Manivel
- Department of Pathology, Veterans Administration Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Mohammad Bilal
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Minnesota & Veterans Administration Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Nicholas Shaheen
- Department of Gastroenteorlogy and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Aasma Shaukat
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, NYU-Lagone School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Brian J Hanson
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Minnesota & Veterans Administration Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Stawinski PM, Dziadkowiec KN, Kuo LA, Echavarria J, Saligram S. Barrett's Esophagus: An Updated Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13020321. [PMID: 36673131 PMCID: PMC9858189 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13020321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 11/05/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is a change in the distal esophageal mucosal lining, whereby metaplastic columnar epithelium replaces squamous epithelium of the esophagus. This change represents a pre-malignant mucosal transformation which has a known association with the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a risk factor for BE, other risk factors include patients who are Caucasian, age > 50 years, central obesity, tobacco use, history of peptic stricture and erosive gastritis. Screening for BE remains selective based on risk factors, a screening program in the general population is not routinely recommended. Diagnosis of BE is established with a combination of endoscopic recognition, targeted biopsies, and histologic confirmation of columnar metaplasia. We aim to provide a comprehensive review of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, screening and advanced techniques of detecting and eradicating Barrett’s esophagus.
Collapse
|
21
|
Fukami N. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the Esophagus: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2023; 33:55-66. [PMID: 36375886 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2022.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is well-accepted endoscopic resection modality for esophageal lesions with benefits in certain situations. ESD offers potential cure for early esophageal cancer and detailed pathologic information for risk stratification. Techniques are mostly standardized, and the use of traction method is encouraged. Indication and proper techniques of ESD in esophageal disease and clinical outcomes will be discussed in this article with pearls for care planning and management during periprocedural period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norio Fukami
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 13400 E Shea Boulevard, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Liang J, Jiang Y, Abboud Y, Gaddam S. Role of Endoscopy in Management of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers. Diseases 2022; 11:diseases11010003. [PMID: 36648868 PMCID: PMC9844461 DOI: 10.3390/diseases11010003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) malignancy is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Upper endoscopy has an established role in diagnosing and staging upper GI cancers, screening for pre-malignant lesions, and providing palliation in cases of advanced malignancy. New advances in endoscopic techniques and technology have improved diagnostic accuracy and increased the therapeutic potential of upper endoscopy. We aim to describe the different types of endoscopic technology used in cancer diagnosis, summarize the current guidelines for endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of malignant and pre-malignant lesions, and explore new potential roles for endoscopy in cancer therapy.
Collapse
|
23
|
Kahn A, Crook J, Heckman MG, Wieczorek MA, Sami S, Snyder D, Agarwal S, Santiago J, Fernandez-Sordo JO, Tan WK, Lansing R, Wang KK, Ragunath K, DiPietro M, Wolfsen H, Ramirez F, Fleischer D, Leggett CL, Iyer PG. Optimized Surveillance Intervals Following Endoscopic Eradication of Dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus: An International Cohort Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:2763-2771.e3. [PMID: 35245702 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.02.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Recommended surveillance intervals after complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) after endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) are largely not evidence-based. Using recurrence rates in a multicenter international Barrett's esophagus (BE) CE-IM cohort, we aimed to generate optimal intervals for surveillance. METHODS Patients with dysplastic BE undergoing EET and achieving CE-IM from prospectively maintained databases at 5 tertiary-care centers in the United States and the United Kingdom were included. The cumulative incidence of recurrence was estimated, accounting for the unknown date of actual recurrence that lies between the dates of current and previous endoscopy. This cumulative incidence of recurrence subsequently was used to estimate the proportion of patients with undetected recurrence for various surveillance intervals over 5 years. Intervals were selected that minimized recurrences remaining undetected for more than 6 months. Actual patterns of post-CE-IM follow-up evaluation are described. RESULTS A total of 498 patients (with baseline low-grade dysplasia, 115 patients; high-grade dysplasia [HGD], 288 patients; and intramucosal adenocarcinoma [IMCa], 95 patients) were included. Any recurrence occurred in 27.1% and dysplastic recurrence occurred in 8.4% over a median of 2.6 years of follow-up evaluation. For pre-ablation HGD/IMCa, intervals of 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, and then annually, resulted in no patients with dysplastic recurrence undetected for more than 6 months, comparable with current guideline recommendations despite a 33% reduction in the number of surveillance endoscopies. For pre-ablation low-grade dysplasia, intervals of 1, 2, and 4 years balanced endoscopic burden and undetected recurrence risk. CONCLUSIONS Lengthening post-CE-IM surveillance intervals would reduce the endoscopic burden after CE-IM with comparable rates of recurrent HGD/IMCa. Future guidelines should consider reduced surveillance frequency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allon Kahn
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Julia Crook
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Michael G Heckman
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Mikolaj A Wieczorek
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Sarmed Sami
- University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Diana Snyder
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Siddharth Agarwal
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jose Santiago
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - W Keith Tan
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ramona Lansing
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Kenneth K Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | - Herbert Wolfsen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Francisco Ramirez
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - David Fleischer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Cadman L Leggett
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Prasad G Iyer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Muthusamy VR, Wani S, Gyawali CP, Komanduri S. AGA Clinical Practice Update on New Technology and Innovation for Surveillance and Screening in Barrett's Esophagus: Expert Review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:2696-2706.e1. [PMID: 35788412 PMCID: PMC10203866 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 05/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
DESCRIPTION The purpose of this best practice advice (BPA) article from the Clinical Practice Update Committee of the American Gastroenterological Association is to provide an update on advances and innovation regarding the screening and surveillance of Barrett's esophagus. METHODS The BPA statements presented here were developed from expert review of existing literature combined with discussion and expert opinion to provide practical advice. Formal rating of the quality of evidence or strength of BPAs was not the intent of this clinical practice update. This expert review was commissioned and approved by the AGA Institute Clinical Practice Updates Committee (CPUC) and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership, and underwent internal peer review by the CPUC and external peer review through standard procedures of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Screening with standard upper endoscopy may be considered in individuals with at least 3 established risk factors for Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma, including individuals who are male, non-Hispanic white, age >50 years, have a history of smoking, chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease, obesity, or a family history of BE or esophageal adenocarcinoma. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Nonendoscopic cell-collection devices may be considered as an option to screen for BE. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: Screening and surveillance endoscopic examination should be performed using high-definition white light endoscopy and virtual chromoendoscopy, with endoscopists spending adequate time inspecting the Barrett's segment. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Screening and surveillance exams should define the extent of BE using a standardized grading system documenting the circumferential and maximal extent of the columnar lined esophagus (Prague classification) with a clear description of landmarks and the location and characteristics of visible lesions (nodularity, ulceration), when present. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: Advanced imaging technologies such as endomicroscopy may be used as adjunctive techniques to identify dysplasia. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: Sampling during screening and surveillance exams should be performed using the Seattle biopsy protocol (4-quadrant biopsies every 1-2 cm and target biopsies from any visible lesion). BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Wide-area transepithelial sampling may be used as an adjunctive technique to sample the suspected or established Barrett's segment (in addition to the Seattle biopsy protocol). BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: Patients with erosive esophagitis should be biopsied when concern of dysplasia or malignancy exists. A repeat endoscopy should be performed after 8 weeks of twice a day proton pump inhibitor therapy. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: Tissue systems pathology-based prediction assay may be utilized for risk stratification of patients with nondysplastic BE. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 10: Risk stratification models may be utilized to selectively identify individuals at risk for Barrett's associated neoplasia. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 11: Given the significant interobserver variability among pathologists, the diagnosis of BE-related neoplasia should be confirmed by an expert pathology review. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 12: Patients with BE-related neoplasia should be referred to endoscopists with expertise in advanced imaging, resection, and ablation. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 13: All patients with BE should be placed on at least daily proton pump inhibitor therapy. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 14: Patients with nondysplastic BE should undergo surveillance endoscopy in 3 to 5 years. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 15: In patients undergoing surveillance after endoscopic eradication therapy, random biopsies should be taken of the esophagogastric junction, gastric cardia, and the distal 2 cm of the neosquamous epithelium as well as from all visible lesions, independent of the length of the original BE segment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Raman Muthusamy
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado
| | - C Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Srinadh Komanduri
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Taylor AS, Setia N, Alpert L, Zhao L, Lamps LW, Hart J, Waxman I, Hissong E, Choi EYK, Shi J, Owens S, Westerhoff M. Measuring the Submucosal Depth of Invasion in Endoscopic Mucosal Resections for Barrett-associated Adenocarcinoma: Practical Issues and Relevance for the Decision for Esophagectomy. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2022; 146:1338-1344. [PMID: 35213893 PMCID: PMC9402809 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0072-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has made it possible for Barrett esophagus patients with superficial cancers to be treated without esophagectomy. Recent guidelines recommend measuring depth of invasion (DOI) in submucosal cancers based on reports that in low-risk cancers, submucosal invasion 500 μm or less is associated with low nodal metastasis rates. However, pathologists face challenges in reproducibly measuring DOI. OBJECTIVE.— To determine how often DOI measurements could impact treatment and to evaluate reproducibility in measuring submucosal DOI in EMR specimens. DESIGN.— Consecutive adenocarcinoma EMR cases were identified, including cases of "low histologic risk" submucosal cancer, as follows: those with negative deep margins, no high-grade histology (G3), and no lymphovascular invasion. Submucosal DOI was measured by 7 pathologists according to guidelines. RESULTS.— Of 213 cancer EMR cases, 46 were submucosa invasive and 6 cases were low histologic risk submucosal cancers for which measurement could impact decision-making. Of these low histologic risk cases, 3 were categorized as superficial, indicating that measurement would be a clinically actionable decision point in only 1.4% of adenocarcinoma EMRs. Interobserver agreement for in-depth categorization between 7 pathologists was moderate (κ = 0.42), and the range of measurements spanned the 500-μm relevant threshold in 40 of 55 measured samples (72.7%). CONCLUSIONS.— While therapeutic decisions would rarely have depended on DOI measurements alone in our cohort, interobserver variability raises concerns about their use as a sole factor on which to offer patients conservative therapy. Responsibly reporting and clinically using submucosal DOI measurements will require practical experience troubleshooting common histologic artifacts, as well as multidisciplinary awareness of the impact of variable specimen-handling practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander S Taylor
- From the Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, (Taylor, Lamps, Hissong, Choi, Shi, Owens, Westerhoff)
| | - Namrata Setia
- Department of Pathology (Setia, Alpert, Hart), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Lindsay Alpert
- Department of Pathology (Setia, Alpert, Hart), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Lili Zhao
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor (Zhao)
| | - Laura W Lamps
- From the Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, (Taylor, Lamps, Hissong, Choi, Shi, Owens, Westerhoff)
| | - John Hart
- Department of Pathology (Setia, Alpert, Hart), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Irving Waxman
- Department of Gastroenterology (Waxman), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
- Center for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics (Waxman), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Erika Hissong
- From the Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, (Taylor, Lamps, Hissong, Choi, Shi, Owens, Westerhoff)
| | - Eun-Young Karen Choi
- From the Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, (Taylor, Lamps, Hissong, Choi, Shi, Owens, Westerhoff)
| | - Jiaqi Shi
- From the Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, (Taylor, Lamps, Hissong, Choi, Shi, Owens, Westerhoff)
| | - Scott Owens
- From the Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, (Taylor, Lamps, Hissong, Choi, Shi, Owens, Westerhoff)
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Mittal C, Muthusamy VR, Simon VC, Brauer BC, Mullady DK, Hollander T, Sloan I, Kushnir V, Early D, Rastogi A, Hammad HT, Edmundowicz SA, Han S, Thaker AM, Ezekwe E, Wani S, Kwasny MJ, Komanduri S. Threshold evaluation for optimal number of endoscopic treatment sessions to achieve complete eradication of Barrett's metaplasia. Endoscopy 2022; 54:927-933. [PMID: 35135015 DOI: 10.1055/a-1765-7197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) is the standard of care for Barrett's esophagus (BE)-associated neoplasia. Previous data suggest the mean number of EET sessions required to achieve complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) is 3. This study aimed to define the threshold of EET sessions required to achieve CE-IM. METHODS The TREAT-BE Consortium is a multicenter outcomes cohort including prospectively enrolled patients with BE undergoing EET. All patients achieving CE-IM were included. Demographic, endoscopic, and histologic data were recorded at treatment onset along with treatment details and surveillance data. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to define a threshold of EET sessions, with 95 %CI, required to achieve CE-IM. A secondary analysis examined predictors of incomplete response to EET using multiple logistic regression and recurrence rates. RESULTS 623 patients (mean age 65.2 [SD 11.6], 79.6 % male, 86.5 % Caucasian) achieved CE-IM in a mean of 2.9 (SD 1.7) EET sessions (median 2) and a median total observation period of 2.7 years (interquartile range 1.4-5.0). After three sessions, 73 % of patients achieved CE-IM (95 %CI 70 %-77 %). Age (odds ratio [OR] 1.25, 95 %CI 1.05-1.50) and length of BE (OR 1.24, 95 %CI 1.17-1.31) were significant predictors of incomplete response. CONCLUSION The current study found that a threshold of three EET sessions would achieve CE-IM in the majority of patients. Alternative therapies and further diagnostic testing should be considered for patients who do not have significant response to EET after three sessions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chetan Mittal
- Interventional Oncology and Surgical Endoscopy, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States
| | - V Raman Muthusamy
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Violette C Simon
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Brian C Brauer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Daniel K Mullady
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
| | - Thomas Hollander
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
| | - Ian Sloan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
| | - Vladimir Kushnir
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
| | - Dayna Early
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
| | - Amit Rastogi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Kansas University, Kansas City, Kansas, United States
| | - Hazem T Hammad
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Steven A Edmundowicz
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Samuel Han
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Adarsh M Thaker
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Ezenwanyi Ezekwe
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Mary J Kwasny
- Interventional Oncology and Surgical Endoscopy, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States
| | - Srinadh Komanduri
- Interventional Oncology and Surgical Endoscopy, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Qumseya B, Qumsiyeh Y, Sarheed A, Rosasco R, Qumseya A. Barrett’s Esophagus in Obese Patient Post-Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Systematic Review. Obes Surg 2022; 32:3513-3522. [DOI: 10.1007/s11695-022-06272-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
28
|
Wani S, Souza RF, Durkalski VL, Serrano J, Hamilton F, Shaheen NJ. Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Surveillance Versus Endoscopic Therapy for Barrett's Esophagus With Low-grade Dysplasia: The SURVENT Trial: Study Rationale, Methodology, Innovation, and Implications. Gastroenterology 2022; 163:556-562.e4. [PMID: 35679951 PMCID: PMC9398991 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.05.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Revised: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Rhonda F. Souza
- Department of Medicine, Center for Esophageal Diseases, Baylor University Medical Center and Center for Esophageal Research, Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, Texas
| | - Valerie L. Durkalski
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Jose Serrano
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive Kidney Diseases, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Frank Hamilton
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive Kidney Diseases, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Nicholas J. Shaheen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Adverse events associated with EGD and EGD-related techniques. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96:389-401.e1. [PMID: 35843754 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.04.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
30
|
Desai M, Lieberman D, Srinivasan S, Nutalapati V, Challa A, Kalgotra P, Sundaram S, Repici A, Hassan C, Kaminski MF, Sharma P. Post-endoscopy Barrett's neoplasia after a negative index endoscopy: a systematic review and proposal for definitions and performance measures in endoscopy. Endoscopy 2022; 54:881-889. [PMID: 34979570 DOI: 10.1055/a-1729-8066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A high rate of neoplasia, both high grade dysplasia (HGD) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has been reported in Barrett's esophagus at index endoscopy, but precise rates of post-endoscopy Barrett's neoplasia (PEBN) are unknown. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed examining electronic databases (inception to October 2021) for studies reporting PEBN. Consistent with the definitions of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer proposed by the World Endoscopy Organization, we defined neoplasia (HGD/EAC) detected at index endoscopy and/or within 6 months of a negative index endoscopy as "prevalent" neoplasia, that detected after 6 months of a negative index endoscopy and prior to next surveillance interval (i. e. 3 years) as PEBN or "interval" neoplasia, and that detected after 36 months from a negative index endoscopy as "incident" neoplasia. The pooled incidence rates and proportions relative to total neoplasia were analyzed. RESULTS 11 studies (n = 59 795; 61 % men; mean [SD] age 62.3 [3.3] years) met the inclusion criteria. The pooled incidence rates were: prevalent neoplasia 4.5 % (95 %CI 2.2 %-8.9 %) at baseline and an additional 0.3 % (0.1 %-0.7 %) within the first 6 months, PEBN 0.52 % (0.46 %-0.58 %), and incident neoplasia 1.4 % (0.9 %-2.1 %). At 3 years from the index endoscopy, PEBN accounted for 3 % of total Barrett's neoplasia, while prevalent neoplasia accounted for 97 %. CONCLUSION Neoplasia detected at or within 6 months of index endoscopy accounts for most cases of Barrett's neoplasia (> 90 %). PEBN accounts for ~3 % of cases and can be used for validation in future. This highlights the importance of a high quality index endoscopy in Barrett's esophagus and the need to establish quality benchmarks to measure endoscopists' performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madhav Desai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - David Lieberman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Sachin Srinivasan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Venkat Nutalapati
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Abhishek Challa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Pankush Kalgotra
- Raymond J. Harbert College of Business, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA
| | - Suneha Sundaram
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.,Department of Medicine, St. Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.,IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.,IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Michal F Kaminski
- Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, and Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Oncology, Medical Centre for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland.,Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Prateek Sharma
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Guideline to Practice: Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus: An Updated ACG Guideline. Am J Gastroenterol 2022; 117:1177-1180. [PMID: 35467555 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
32
|
Wolfson P, Ho KMA, Wilson A, McBain H, Hogan A, Lipman G, Dunn J, Haidry R, Novelli M, Olivo A, Lovat LB. Endoscopic eradication therapy for Barrett's esophagus-related neoplasia: a final 10-year report from the UK National HALO Radiofrequency Ablation Registry. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96:223-233. [PMID: 35189088 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Long-term durability data for effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to prevent esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE) are lacking. METHODS We prospectively collected data from 2535 patients with BE (mean length, 5.2 cm; range, 1-20) and neoplasia (20% low-grade dysplasia, 54% high-grade dysplasia, 26% intramucosal carcinoma) who underwent RFA therapy across 28 UK hospitals. We assessed rates of invasive cancer and performed detailed analyses of 1175 patients to assess clearance rates of dysplasia (CR-D) and intestinal metaplasia (CR-IM) within 2 years of starting RFA therapy. We assessed relapses and rates of return to CR-D (CR-D2) and CR-IM (CR-IM2) after further therapy. CR-D and CR-IM were confirmed by an absence of dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia on biopsy samples taken at 2 consecutive endoscopies. RESULTS Ten years after starting treatment, the Kaplan-Meier (KM) cancer rate was 4.1% with a crude incidence rate of .52 per 100 patient-years. CR-D and CR-IM after 2 years of therapy were 88% and 62.6%, respectively. KM relapse rates were 5.9% from CR-D and 18.7% from CR-IM at 8 years, with most occurring in the first 2 years. Both were successfully retreated with rates of CR-D2 of 63.4% and CR-IM2 of 70.0% 2 years after retreatment. EMR before RFA increased the likelihood of rescue EMR from 17.2% to 41.7% but did not affect the rate of CR-D, whereas rescue EMR after RFA commenced reduced CR-D from 91.4% to 79.7% (χ2P < .001). CONCLUSIONS RFA treatment is effective and durable to prevent esophageal adenocarcinoma. Most treatment relapses occur early and can be successfully retreated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Wolfson
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional & Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK; Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Kai Man Alexander Ho
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional & Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK; Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK; Gastrointestinal Services, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ash Wilson
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Hazel McBain
- Gastrointestinal Services, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Aine Hogan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Gideon Lipman
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jason Dunn
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rehan Haidry
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK; Gastrointestinal Services, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Marco Novelli
- Research Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Alessandro Olivo
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional & Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Laurence B Lovat
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional & Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK; Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK; Gastrointestinal Services, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Paiji C, Sedarat A. Endoscopic Management of Esophageal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153583. [PMID: 35892840 PMCID: PMC9329770 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Advances in technology and improved understanding of the pathobiology of esophageal cancer have allowed endoscopy to serve a growing role in the management of this disease. Precursor lesions can be detected using enhanced diagnostic modalities and eradicated with ablation therapy. Furthermore, evolution in endoscopic resection has provided larger specimens for improved diagnostic accuracy and offer potential for cure of early esophageal cancer. In patients with advanced esophageal cancer, endoluminal therapy can improve symptom burden and provide therapeutic options for complications such as leaks, perforations, and fistulas. The purpose of this review article is to highlight the role of endoscopy in the diagnosis, treatment, and palliation of esophageal cancer.
Collapse
|
34
|
Wani S. Personalized Approach to the Post-Endoscopic Eradication Therapy Barrett's Esophagus Patient. Gastroenterology 2022; 163:39-42. [PMID: 35526573 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Fasullo M, Shah T, Patel M, Mutha P, Zfass A, Lippman R, Smallfield G. Outcomes of Radiofrequency Ablation Compared to Liquid Nitrogen Spray Cryotherapy for the Eradication of Dysplasia in Barrett's Esophagus. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67:2320-2326. [PMID: 33954846 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-06991-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Current guidelines recommend endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) for Barrett's esophagus (BE) with dysplasia and intramucosal adenocarcinoma using either radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or liquid nitrogen spray cryotherapy (LNSC). The aims of this multicenter study are to compare the rate and number of treatment sessions of RFA vs. LNSC to achieve CE-D and CE-IM and assess outcomes for those who switched therapy. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with BE undergoing EET. Demographics, baseline variables, endoscopy details, and histology information were abstracted. RESULTS One hundred and sixty-two patients were included in this study with 100 patients in the RFA group and 62 patients in the LNSC group. The rate of CE-D and CE-IM did not differ between the RFA group and LNSC group (81% vs. 71.0%, p = 0.14) and (64% vs. 66%, p = 0.78), respectively. The number of sessions to achieve CE-D and CE-IM was higher with LNSC compared to RFA (4.2 vs. 3.2, p = 0.05) and (4.8 vs. 3.5, p = 0.04), respectively. The likelihood of developing recurrent dysplasia was higher among patients who did not achieve CE-IM (12%) compared to those who did achieve CE-IM (4%), p = 0.04. Similar findings were found in those who switched treatment modalities. DISCUSSION EET is highly effective in eradication of Barrett's associated dysplasia and neoplasia. Both RFA and LNSC achieved similar rates of CE-D and CE-IM although LNSC required more sessions. Also, achievement of CE-IM was associated with less recurrence rates of dysplasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Fasullo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, 1200 E. Broad St, PO Box 980341, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA. .,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hunter Holmes-McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA, 23249, USA.
| | - Tilak Shah
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, 1200 E. Broad St, PO Box 980341, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hunter Holmes-McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA, 23249, USA
| | - Milan Patel
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, 1200 E. Broad St, PO Box 980341, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hunter Holmes-McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA, 23249, USA
| | - Pritesh Mutha
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, 1200 E. Broad St, PO Box 980341, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hunter Holmes-McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA, 23249, USA
| | - Alvin Zfass
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hunter Holmes-McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA, 23249, USA
| | - Robert Lippman
- Department of Pathology, Hunter Holmes-McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA, 23249, USA
| | - George Smallfield
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, 1200 E. Broad St, PO Box 980341, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Gotink AW, Peters Y, Bruno MJ, Siersema PD, Koch AD. Nonthermal resection device for ablation of Barrett's esophagus: a feasibility and safety study. Endoscopy 2022; 54:545-552. [PMID: 34521118 DOI: 10.1055/a-1644-4326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several techniques exist for the eradication of Barrett's esophagus (BE); however, all have limitations regarding successful conversion to squamous epithelium and a complication profile. We aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of a new nonthermal device, the EndoRotor, for the eradication of BE as a first-line ablation technique. METHODS Patients with BE were prospectively included at two tertiary referral centers in The Netherlands. INCLUSION CRITERIA BE length 2-5 cm, with low grade dysplasia, high grade dysplasia, or residual BE after endoscopic resection (ER) of a lesion containing early neoplasia. EXCLUSION CRITERIA previous ER > 50 % circumference, or previous ablation therapy. Follow-up endoscopy was performed 3 months after ablation therapy. Outcomes were the percentage of endoscopically visible BE surface regression and complications. RESULTS 30 patients were included (age 66 years, interquartile range [IQR] 59-73, median BE C0M3, 25 male). Overall, 18 patients underwent ER prior to ablation. Median percentage BE ablated was 100 % (IQR 94 %-100 %). Median visual BE surface regression at 3-month follow-up was 80 % (IQR 68 %-95 %). Multiple residual Barrett's islands were commonly seen. Six patients (20 %) had a treatment-related complication requiring intervention, including one perforation (3 %), one postprocedural hemorrhage (3 %), and four strictures (13 %). Post-procedural pain was reported in 18 patients (60 %). CONCLUSIONS Endoscopic ablation of BE using this novel nonthermal device was found to be technically demanding, with a longer procedure time compared with established ablation techniques and a high complication rate. Based on these results, we do not recommend its use as a first-line ablation technique for the eradication of BE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annieke W Gotink
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yonne Peters
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Arjun D Koch
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Maione F, Chini A, Maione R, Manigrasso M, Marello A, Cassese G, Gennarelli N, Milone M, De Palma GD. Endoscopic Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus with Low-Grade Dysplasia. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12051295. [PMID: 35626450 PMCID: PMC9141542 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12051295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2022] [Revised: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Barrett’s Esophagus is a common condition associated with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease. It is well known that it has an association with a higher incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma, but this neoplastic transformation is first preceded by the onset of low and high-grade dysplasia. The evaluation of low grade dysplastic esophageal mucosa is still controversial; although endoscopic surveillance is preferred, several minimally invasive endoscopic therapeutic approaches are available. Endoscopic mucosal resection and radiofrequency ablation are the most used endoscopic treatments for the eradication of low-grade dysplasia, respectively, for nodular and flat dysplasia. Novel endoscopic treatments are cryotherapy ablation and argon plasma coagulation, that have good rates of eradication with less complications and post-procedural pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Maione
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.C.); (A.M.); (G.C.); (N.G.); (M.M.); (G.D.D.P.)
- Correspondence: (F.M.); (R.M.)
| | - Alessia Chini
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.C.); (A.M.); (G.C.); (N.G.); (M.M.); (G.D.D.P.)
| | - Rosa Maione
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.C.); (A.M.); (G.C.); (N.G.); (M.M.); (G.D.D.P.)
- Correspondence: (F.M.); (R.M.)
| | - Michele Manigrasso
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Alessandra Marello
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.C.); (A.M.); (G.C.); (N.G.); (M.M.); (G.D.D.P.)
| | - Gianluca Cassese
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.C.); (A.M.); (G.C.); (N.G.); (M.M.); (G.D.D.P.)
| | - Nicola Gennarelli
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.C.); (A.M.); (G.C.); (N.G.); (M.M.); (G.D.D.P.)
| | - Marco Milone
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.C.); (A.M.); (G.C.); (N.G.); (M.M.); (G.D.D.P.)
| | - Giovanni Domenico De Palma
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.C.); (A.M.); (G.C.); (N.G.); (M.M.); (G.D.D.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Calderwood AH, Sawhney MS, Thosani NC, Rebbeck TR, Wani S, Canto MI, Fishman DS, Golan T, Hidalgo M, Kwon RS, Riegert-Johnson DL, Sahani DV, Stoffel EM, Vollmer CM, Al-Haddad MA, Amateau SK, Buxbaum JL, DiMaio CJ, Fujii-Lau LL, Jamil LH, Jue TL, Law JK, Lee JK, Naveed M, Pawa S, Storm AC, Qumseya BJ. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on screening for pancreatic cancer in individuals with genetic susceptibility: methodology and review of evidence. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95:827-854.e3. [PMID: 35183359 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Audrey H Calderwood
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Mandeep S Sawhney
- Division of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nirav C Thosani
- Center for Interventional Gastroenterology at UTHealth, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Timothy R Rebbeck
- Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Marcia I Canto
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Douglas S Fishman
- Section of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Talia Golan
- Cancer Center, Sheba Medical Center, Yehuda, Israel
| | - Manuel Hidalgo
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Richard S Kwon
- Division of Gastroenterology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Douglas L Riegert-Johnson
- Department of Clinical Genomics and Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Dushyant V Sahani
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Elena M Stoffel
- Division of Gastroenterology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Charles M Vollmer
- Department of Surgery, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mohammad A Al-Haddad
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Stuart K Amateau
- Division of Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - James L Buxbaum
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Christopher J DiMaio
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Larissa L Fujii-Lau
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Queen's Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
| | - Laith H Jamil
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan, and Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan, USA
| | - Terry L Jue
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Permanente Medical Group, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Joanna K Law
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jeffrey K Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Mariam Naveed
- Advent Health Medical Group, Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Advent Health Hospital Altamonte Springs, Altamonte Springs, Florida, USA
| | - Swati Pawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Andrew C Storm
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Bashar J Qumseya
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Mejia Perez LK, Yang D, Draganov PV, Jawaid S, Chak A, Dumot J, Alaber O, Vargo JJ, Jang S, Mehta N, Fukami N, Chua T, Gabr M, Kudaravalli P, Aihara H, Maluf-Filho F, Ngamruengphong S, Pourmousavi Khoshknab M, Bhatt A. Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs. endoscopic mucosal resection for early Barrett's neoplasia in the West: a retrospective study. Endoscopy 2022; 54:439-446. [PMID: 34450667 DOI: 10.1055/a-1541-7659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The difference in clinical outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for early Barrett's esophagus (BE) neoplasia remains unclear. We compared the recurrence/residual tissue rates, resection outcomes, and adverse events after ESD and EMR for early BE neoplasia. METHODS We included patients who underwent EMR or ESD for BE-associated high grade dysplasia (HGD) or T1a esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) at eight academic hospitals. We compared demographic, procedural, and histologic characteristics, and follow-up data. A time-to-event analysis was performed to evaluate recurrence/residual disease and a Kaplan-Meier curve was used to compare the groups. RESULTS 243 patients (150 EMR; 93 ESD) were included. EMR had lower en bloc (43 % vs. 89 %; P < 0.001) and R0 (56 % vs. 73 %; P = 0.01) rates than ESD. There was no difference in the rates of perforation (0.7 % vs. 0; P > 0.99), early bleeding (0.7 % vs. 1 %; P > 0.99), delayed bleeding (3.3 % vs. 2.1 %; P = 0.71), and stricture (10 % vs. 16 %; P = 0.16) between EMR and ESD. Patients with non-curative resections who underwent further therapy were excluded from the recurrence analysis. Recurrent/residual disease was 31.4 % [44/140] for EMR and 3.5 % [3/85] for ESD during a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 15.5 (6.75-30) and 8 (2-18) months, respectively. Recurrence-/residual disease-free survival was significantly higher in the ESD group. More patients required additional endoscopic resection procedures to treat recurrent/residual disease after EMR (EMR 24.2 % vs. ESD 3.5 %; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS ESD is safe and results in more definitive treatment of early BE neoplasia, with significantly lower recurrence/residual disease rates and less need for repeat endoscopic treatments than with EMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dennis Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Peter V Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Salmaan Jawaid
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Amitabh Chak
- Digestive Health Institute, University Hospitals, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - John Dumot
- Digestive Health Institute, University Hospitals, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Omar Alaber
- Digestive Health Institute, University Hospitals, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - John J Vargo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Sunguk Jang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Neal Mehta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Norio Fukami
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Tiffany Chua
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Moamen Gabr
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Praneeth Kudaravalli
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Hiroyuki Aihara
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Fauze Maluf-Filho
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Saowanee Ngamruengphong
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Amit Bhatt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Sawhney MS, Calderwood AH, Thosani NC, Rebbeck TR, Wani S, Canto MI, Fishman DS, Golan T, Hidalgo M, Kwon RS, Riegert-Johnson DL, Sahani DV, Stoffel EM, Vollmer CM, Qumseya BJ. ASGE guideline on screening for pancreatic cancer in individuals with genetic susceptibility: summary and recommendations. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95:817-826. [PMID: 35183358 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mandeep S Sawhney
- Division of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Audrey H Calderwood
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Nirav C Thosani
- Center for Interventional Gastroenterology at UT Health, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Timothy R Rebbeck
- Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Marcia I Canto
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Douglas S Fishman
- Section of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Talia Golan
- Oncology Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Manuel Hidalgo
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Richard S Kwon
- Division of Gastroenterology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Douglas L Riegert-Johnson
- Department of Clinical Genomics and Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Dushyant V Sahani
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Elena M Stoffel
- Division of Gastroenterology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Charles M Vollmer
- Department of Surgery, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Bashar J Qumseya
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Endoscopic Management of Barrett's Esophagus. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67:1469-1479. [PMID: 35226224 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-022-07395-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
|
42
|
Qumseya B, Bukannan A, Rosasco R, Liu X, Qumseya A. Surveillance of Barrett's esophagus using wide-area transepithelial sampling: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E394-E402. [PMID: 35433217 PMCID: PMC9010089 DOI: 10.1055/a-1783-9015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Wide-area transepithelial sampling (WATS) is an emerging technique that may increase dysplasia detection in Barrett's esophagus (BE). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of patients who underwent surveillance for BE assessing the additional yield of WATS to forceps biopsy (FB). Methods We searched Pubmed, Embase, Web of science, and the Cochrane library, ending in January 2021. The primary outcomes of interest were the relative and absolute increase in dysplasia detection when adding WATS to FB. Heterogeneity was assessed using I 2 and Q statistic. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and classic fail-safe test. Results A total of seven studies were included totaling 2,816 patients. FB identified 158 dysplasia cases, whereas WATS resulted in an additional 114 cases. The pooled risk ratio (RR) of all dysplasia detection was 1.7 (1.43-2.03), P < 0.001, I 2 = 0. For high-grade dysplasia (HGD), the pooled RR was 1.88 (1.28-2.77), P = 0.001, I 2 = 33 %. The yield of WATS was dependent on the prevalence of dysplasia in the study population. Among studies with high rates of dysplasia, the absolute increase in dysplasia detection (risk difference, RD) was 13 % (8 %-18 %, P < 0.0001, number needed to treat [NNT] = 8). The pooled RD in HGD was 9 % (2 %-16 %), P < 0.001, NNT = 11. For studies with a low prevalence of dysplasia, RD for all dysplasia was 2 % (1 %-3 %), P = 0.001, NNT = 50. For HGD, the RD was 0.6 % (0.2 %-1.3 %), P = 0.019, NNT = 166. Conclusions In populations with a high prevalence of dysplasia, adding WATS to FB results in a significant increase in dysplasia detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bashar Qumseya
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Aymen Bukannan
- Archbold Gastroenterology Group, Thomasville, Georgia, United States
| | - Robyn Rosasco
- Florida A & M University, 334 Palmer Ave, Tallahassee, Florida, United States
| | - Xiuli Liu
- Department of Pathology, Immunology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Amira Qumseya
- Department of Public Health, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Adherence to Surveillance Endoscopies Posteradication of Barrett's Esophagus With High-grade Dysplasia or Carcinoma In Situ. J Clin Gastroenterol 2022; 57:459-465. [PMID: 35389913 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
GOALS We aimed to evaluate factors associated with patient adherence to recommended surveillance guidelines during the first 3 years after endoscopic eradication of Barrett's esophagus (BE) with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or T1a carcinoma in situ (CIS) and the relationship between adherence and detection of recurrence. BACKGROUND While surveillance endoscopies after treatment of BE with HGD or T1a CIS are an important component of therapy, it is unclear whether these high-risk patients are adhering to recommended surveillance guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 123 BE patients who underwent radiofrequency ablation±endoscopic mucosal resection for biopsy-proven HGD, or CIS between January 2010 and November 2018 underwent retrospective review for adherence to surveillance guidelines, patient factors related to adherence, and recurrence of dysplasia or CIS at 12, 24, and 36 months. RESULTS Of 123 BE patients (89 HGD and 34 CIS), adherence during the first year following treatment was 26.97% for HGD patients and 41.18% for CIS patients, with increasing adherence rates in subsequent years. Patients who received 3 to 4 surveillance endoscopies in the first year posttreatment had significantly higher rates of recurrence detection than patients who received 0 to 2 surveillance endoscopies over this interval (P=0.01). No patient factors were found to impact adherence significantly. CONCLUSIONS Adherence to recommended surveillance intervals after endoscopic treatment of BE with HGD or CIS is low, with poor adherence during the first year associated with decreased detection of recurrence. Future studies are needed to evaluate risk factors and develop a potential intervention for poor adherence in this high-risk population.
Collapse
|
44
|
Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus: An Updated ACG Guideline. Am J Gastroenterol 2022; 117:559-587. [PMID: 35354777 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 142] [Impact Index Per Article: 71.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a common condition associated with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease. BE is the only known precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma, a highly lethal cancer with an increasing incidence over the last 5 decades. These revised guidelines implement Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology to propose recommendations for the definition and diagnosis of BE, screening for BE and esophageal adenocarcinoma, surveillance of patients with known BE, and the medical and endoscopic treatment of BE and its associated early neoplasia. Important changes since the previous iteration of this guideline include a broadening of acceptable screening modalities for BE to include nonendoscopic methods, liberalized intervals for surveillance of short-segment BE, and volume criteria for endoscopic therapy centers for BE. We recommend endoscopic eradication therapy for patients with BE and high-grade dysplasia and those with BE and low-grade dysplasia. We propose structured surveillance intervals for patients with dysplastic BE after successful ablation based on the baseline degree of dysplasia. We could not make recommendations regarding chemoprevention or use of biomarkers in routine practice due to insufficient data.
Collapse
|
45
|
Yang D, King W, Aihara H, Karasik MS, Ngamruengphong S, Aadam AA, Othman MO, Sharma N, Grimm IS, Rostom A, Elmunzer BJ, Jawaid SA, Perbtani YB, Hoffman BJ, Akki AS, Schlachterman A, Coman RM, Wang AY, Draganov PV. Effect of endoscopic submucosal dissection on histologic diagnosis in Barrett's esophagus visible neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95:626-633. [PMID: 34906544 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Data are limited on the role of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as a potential diagnostic and staging tool in Barrett's esophagus (BE) neoplasia. We aimed to evaluate the frequency and factors associated with change of histologic diagnosis by ESD compared with pre-ESD histology. METHODS This was a multicenter, prospective cohort study of patients who underwent ESD for BE visible neoplasia. A change in histologic diagnosis was defined as "upstaged" or "downstaged" if the ESD specimen had a higher or lower degree, respectively, of dysplasia or neoplasia when compared with pre-ESD specimens. RESULTS Two hundred five patients (median age, 69 years; 81% men) with BE visible neoplasia underwent ESD from 2016 to 2021. Baseline histology was obtained using forceps (n = 182) or EMR (n = 23). ESD changed the histologic diagnosis in 55.1% of cases (113/205), of which 68.1% were upstaged and 31.9% downstaged. The frequency of change in diagnosis after ESD was similar whether baseline histology was obtained using forceps (55.5%) or EMR (52.2%) (P = .83). In aggregate, 23.9% of cases (49/205) were upstaged to invasive cancer on ESD histopathology. On multivariate analysis, lesions in the distal esophagus and gastroesophageal junction (odds ratio, 2.1; 95 confidence interval, 1.1-3.9; P = .02) and prior radiofrequency ablation (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-5.5; P = .02) were predictors of change in histologic diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS ESD led to a change of diagnosis in more than half of patients with BE visible neoplasia. Selective ESD can serve as a potential diagnostic and staging tool, particularly in those with suspected invasive disease. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02989818.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - William King
- Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Hiroyuki Aihara
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael S Karasik
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
| | - Saowanee Ngamruengphong
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Abdul Aziz Aadam
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern Medicine Digestive Health Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mohamed O Othman
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Section, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Neil Sharma
- Division of Interventional Endoscopic Oncology and Surgical Endoscopy (IOSE), Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alaa Rostom
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - B Joseph Elmunzer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Salmaan A Jawaid
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Section, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yaseen B Perbtani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Brenda J Hoffman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Ashwin S Akki
- Department of Pathology Immunology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Alexander Schlachterman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Roxana M Coman
- Division of Hospital Gastroenterology, Atrium/Navicent Health, Mercer University, College of Medicine, Macon, Georgia, USA
| | - Andrew Y Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Peter V Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Ishimura N, Okimoto E, Shibagaki K, Ishihara S. Endoscopic diagnosis and screening of Barrett's esophagus: Inconsistency of diagnostic criteria between Japan and Western countries. DEN OPEN 2022; 2:e73. [PMID: 35310704 PMCID: PMC8828243 DOI: 10.1002/deo2.73] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 10/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Barrett's esophagus (BE) is an endoscopically identifiable premalignant condition for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). To diagnose BE precisely, careful inspection of the anatomic landmarks, including the esophagogastric junction and the squamocolumnar junction is important. The distal end of the palisade vessels and the proximal end of the gastric folds are used as the landmark of the esophagogastric junction in endoscopic diagnosis, with the latter solely used internationally, except in some Asian countries, including Japan. In addition, the diagnostic criteria adopted internationally for BE are inconsistent, particularly between Japan and Western countries. Recently updated guidelines in Western countries have included length criteria, with a 1‐cm threshold of columnar epithelium by endoscopic observation and/or histologic confirmation of the presence of specialized intestinal metaplasia. Since BE is endoscopically diagnosed at any length without histologic assessment in Japan, the reported prevalence of short‐segment BE is very high in Japan compared with that in Western countries. Although guidelines on screening exist for BE, the current strategies based on the presence of chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease with multiple risk factors may miss the opportunity for early detection of EAC. Indeed, up to 40% of patients with EAC have no history of chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease. To discuss BE on the same footing worldwide, standardization of diagnostic criteria, screening indication, and establishment of effective techniques for detecting dysplastic lesions are eagerly awaited. Japanese guidelines for BE should be revised regarding the length criteria, including the minimum length and long‐segment BE, in line with the recently updated Western guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norihisa Ishimura
- Second Department of Internal Medicine Shimane University Faculty of Medicine Shimane Japan
| | - Eiko Okimoto
- Second Department of Internal Medicine Shimane University Faculty of Medicine Shimane Japan
| | - Kotaro Shibagaki
- Division of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Shimane University Hospital Shimane Japan
| | - Shunji Ishihara
- Second Department of Internal Medicine Shimane University Faculty of Medicine Shimane Japan
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Nieuwenhuis EA, van Munster SN, Curvers WL, Weusten BLAM, Alvarez Herrero L, Bogte A, Alkhalaf A, Schenk BE, Koch AD, Spaander MCW, Tang TJ, Nagengast WB, Westerhof J, Houben MHMG, Bergman JJ, Schoon EJ, Pouw RE. Impact of expert center endoscopic assessment of confirmed low grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus diagnosed in community hospitals. Endoscopy 2022; 54:936-944. [PMID: 35098524 PMCID: PMC9500007 DOI: 10.1055/a-1754-7309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND : The optimal management for patients with low grade dysplasia (LGD) in Barrett's esophagus (BE) is unclear. According to the Dutch national guideline, all patients with LGD with histological confirmation of the diagnosis by an expert pathologist (i. e. "confirmed LGD"), are referred for a dedicated re-staging endoscopy at an expert center. We aimed to assess the diagnostic value of re-staging endoscopy by an expert endoscopist for patients with confirmed LGD. METHODS : This retrospective cohort study included all patients with flat BE diagnosed in a community hospital who had confirmed LGD and were referred to one of the nine Barrett Expert Centers (BECs) in the Netherlands. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with prevalent high grade dysplasia (HGD) or cancer during re-staging in a BEC. RESULTS : Of the 248 patients with confirmed LGD, re-staging in the BEC revealed HGD or cancer in 23 % (57/248). In 79 % (45/57), HGD or cancer in a newly detected visible lesion was diagnosed. Of the remaining patients, re-staging in the BEC showed a second diagnosis of confirmed LGD in 68 % (168/248), while the remaining 9 % (23/248) had nondysplastic BE. CONCLUSION : One quarter of patients with apparent flat BE with confirmed LGD diagnosed in a community hospital had prevalent HGD or cancer after re-staging at an expert center. This endorses the advice to refer patients with confirmed LGD, including in the absence of visible lesions, to an expert center for re-staging endoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther A. Nieuwenhuis
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne N. van Munster
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter L. Curvers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Bas L. A. M. Weusten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lorenza Alvarez Herrero
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Auke Bogte
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Alaa Alkhalaf
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - B. Ed Schenk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Arjun D. Koch
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manon C. W. Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thjon J. Tang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, IJsselland Hospital, Cappelle aan den Ijssel, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter B. Nagengast
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jessie Westerhof
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Martin H. M. G. Houben
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Haga Teaching Hospital, Den Haag, The Netherlands
| | - Jacques J.G.H.M. Bergman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik J. Schoon
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Roos E. Pouw
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism, Cancer Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Newland JJ, Johnson AM, Feng Z, Kim RE, Williams RT, Hanna NN, Mullins CD, Hu Y. Increasing utilization of endoscopic local excision for early-stage gastric cancers in the United States. Surgery 2022; 172:169-176. [PMID: 35241301 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.01.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2021] [Revised: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Japanese Gastric Cancer Association provided updated criteria for endoscopic local excision of early-stage gastric cancer in 2018. The purpose of this study was to evaluate utilization patterns for endoscopic local excision in the United States for resectable gastric adenocarcinoma. METHODS Patients with resectable gastric adenocarcinoma were identified from the National Cancer Database between 2010 and 2017. Patients were classified into strict appropriate criteria, expanded criteria, and inappropriate based on the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association guidelines. Factors associated with endoscopic local excision were identified using univariate and logistic multivariate regression. RESULTS Within the National Cancer Database, 46,334 patients were stratified into strict appropriate criteria (n = 1,405), expanded criteria (n = 727), and inappropriate (n = 43,675). Annual cases of local excision increased by 76.9% over the study period, from 273 in 2010 to 483 in 2017. Among patients who underwent local excision, 10.1% were classified as strict appropriate criteria, 1.6% were classified as expanded criteria, and 84.5% were classified as inappropriate. Among inappropriate patients, factors associated with endoscopic local excision were: more recent year of diagnosis, increasing age, female sex, tumor located in the cardia, smaller size, low-grade, absence of lymphovascular invasion, and treatment at an academic facility. CONCLUSION The use of endoscopic local excision for gastric cancer has nearly doubled since 2010. However, most patients do not satisfy consensus criteria for endoscopic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John J Newland
- University of Maryland Medical Center, Department of General Surgery, Baltimore, MD
| | - Abree M Johnson
- University of Maryland Baltimore, Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, Baltimore, MD
| | - Zhaoyong Feng
- University of Maryland Baltimore, Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, Baltimore, MD
| | - Raymond E Kim
- University of Maryland Medical Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Baltimore, MD
| | - Richelle T Williams
- University of Maryland Medical Center, Department of General Surgery, Baltimore, MD
| | - Nader N Hanna
- University of Maryland Medical Center, Department of General Surgery, Baltimore, MD
| | - C Daniel Mullins
- University of Maryland Baltimore, Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, Baltimore, MD
| | - Yinin Hu
- University of Maryland Medical Center, Department of General Surgery, Baltimore, MD.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Hall M, Bergman J, Canto MI, Chak A, Corley DA, Falk GW, Fitzgerald RC, Haidry R, Inadomi JM, Iyer PG, Kolb J, Komanduri S, Konda V, Montgomery EA, Muthusamy VR, Rubenstein JH, Schnoll-Sussman F, Shaheen NJ, Smith M, Spechler S, Vajravelu R. Post-endoscopy Esophageal Neoplasia in Barrett's Esophagus: Consensus Statements From an International Expert Panel. Gastroenterology 2022; 162:366-372. [PMID: 34655571 PMCID: PMC8792371 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.09.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Revised: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Hall
- Children’s Hospital Association, Leawood, Kansas
| | - Jacques Bergman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcia I. Canto
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Amitabh Chak
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Douglas A. Corley
- The Permanente Medical Group; Kaiser Permanente, Northern California
| | - Gary W. Falk
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Rebecca C. Fitzgerald
- MRC Cancer Unit, Hutchison-MRC Research Center, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Rehan Haidry
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - John M. Inadomi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Prasad G. Iyer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jennifer Kolb
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California
| | - Srinadh Komanduri
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Vani Konda
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor University Medical Center and Baylor Scott and White Health, Dallas, Texas
| | | | - V. Raman Muthusamy
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Joel H. Rubenstein
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, LTC Charles S. Kettles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor,Michigan Barrett’s Esophagus Program, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Felice Schnoll-Sussman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - Nicholas J. Shaheen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Michael Smith
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mount Sinai West and Mount Sinai Morningside Hospitals, New York, New York
| | - Stuart Spechler
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor University Medical Center and Baylor Scott and White Health, Dallas, Texas
| | - Ravy Vajravelu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Ehlken H, Schmitz R, Riethdorf S, Riethdorf L, Krause J, Karstens KF, Schrader J, Viol F, Giannou A, Sterlacci W, Vieth M, Clauditz T, Kähler C, Mann O, Izbicki JR, Huber S, Pantel K, Rösch T. Possible tumour cell reimplantation during curative endoscopic therapy of superficial Barrett's carcinoma. Gut 2022; 71:277-286. [PMID: 33441377 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopic resection has been established as curative therapy for superficial cancer arising from Barrett's oesophagus (BE); recurrences are very rare. Based on a case series with unusual and massive early recurrences, we analyse the issue of tumour cell reimplantation. METHODS This hypothesis was developed on the basis of two out of seven patients treated by circumferential (n=6) or nearly circumferential (n=1) en bloc and R0 endoscopic resection of T1 neoplastic BE. Subsequently, a prospective histocytological analysis of endoscope channels and accessories was performed in 2 phases (cytohistological analysis; test for cell viability) in 22 different oesophageal carcinoma patients undergoing endoscopy. Finally, cultures from two oesophageal adenocarcinoma cell lines were incubated with different triamcinolone concentrations (0.625-10 mg/mL); cell growth was determined on a Multiwell plate reader. RESULTS Cancer regrowth in the two suspicious cases (male, 78/71 years) occurred 7 and 1 months, respectively, after curative tumour resection. Subsequent surgery showed advanced tumours (T2) with lymph node metastases; one patient died. On cytohistological examinations of channels and accessories, suspicious/neoplastic cells were found in 4/10 superficial and in all 5 advanced cancers. Further analyses in seven further advanced adenocarcinoma cases showed viable cells in two channel washing specimens. Finally, cell culture experiments demonstrated enhanced tumour cell growth by triamcinolone after 24 hours compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS Tumour cell reimplanation from contaminated endoscopes and accessories is a possible cause of local recurrence after curative endoscopic therapy for superficial Barrett carcinoma; also, corticosteroid injection could have promoted tumour regrowth in these cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanno Ehlken
- Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Schmitz
- Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sabine Riethdorf
- Institute of Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Jenny Krause
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Karl-Frederick Karstens
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jörg Schrader
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fabrice Viol
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anastasios Giannou
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Michael Vieth
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Till Clauditz
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Kähler
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Mann
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jakob R Izbicki
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Samuel Huber
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Klaus Pantel
- Institute of Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Rösch
- Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|