Contrast harmonic EUS for the prediction of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor aggressiveness (with videos)

Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis and local ablative therapy of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Advancements in diagnostic technology have led to the improved detection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) and thus to an increase in the number of reported cases. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) technology, including in combination with contrast-enhanced harmonic imaging, aids in distinguishing PNETs from other tumors, while EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration or biopsy has improved the histological diagnosis and grading of tumors. The recent introduction of EUS-guided ablation using ethanol injection or radiofrequency ablation has offered an alternative to surgery in the management of PNETs. Comparisons with surgery have shown similar outcomes but fewer adverse effects. Although standardized protocols and prospective studies with long-term follow-up are still needed, EUS-based methods are promising approaches that can contribute to a better quality of life for PNET patients.

Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography for differentiating between non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm and intrapancreatic accessory spleen

In pancreatic hypervascular masses, it is often difficult to differentiate pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (PanNEN) and intrapancreatic accessory spleen (IPAS) before surgery because of their similar features, such as a round shape and early enhancement. This study aimed to examine the efficacy of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for differentiating between them. This retrospective pilot study enrolled 136 patients with pathologically confirmed non-functional PanNEN or IPAS who underwent EUS at our institution. The clinical features, conventional EUS findings, EUS elastography (EUS-EG) findings, and contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS) findings were retrospectively evaluated. In conventional EUS, calcification had significant differences between PanNEN and IPAS (P = 0.006). On EUS-EG findings (stiff/soft), patients with PanNEN had softer lesions (6 (25%)/18 (75%)) and those with IPAS had stiffer lesions (3 (100%)/0 (0%)) (P = 0.029). CH-EUS revealed that 4/4 (100%) patients with IPAS had hyperechoic or isoechoic vascular patterns up to 300 s, while only 1/15 (7%) patient with PanNEN had such patterns at 300 s (P = 0.001), resulting in significant washout after 180 s in PanNEN group. This study is the first report on EUS to differentiate between PanNEN and IPAS. It is useful to evaluate calcification with conventional EUS, stiffness with EUS-EG, and enhancement patterns with CH-EUS for that.

Endoscopic Ultrasound armamentarium for precise and early diagnosis of biliopancreatic lesions

The diagnostic paradigm for biliopancreatic lesions has been revolutionized by continuous advancements in endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) technologies and techniques. This review examines the expanding diagnostic toolkit available to clinicians, emphasizing innovations that have significantly enhanced precision and early detection capabilities. One of the most transformative advancements is the development of fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needles. Modern designs, including Franseen, and fork-tip configurations, have optimized tissue sampling, achieving diagnostic accuracies exceeding 90 % while minimizing the number of needle passes required. These innovations facilitate the acquisition of high-quality histological specimens suitable for comprehensive molecular profiling, paving the way for personalized therapeutic approaches. Concurrent advancements in sampling techniques have bolstered these needle design improvements. The fanning technique has been particularly effective, increasing diagnostic yields from 71 % to 88 %. Wet suction methods preserve tissue integrity better than traditional approaches, while standardized protocols for needle passes enhance procedural efficiency. For specimen evaluation, Rapid On-Site Evaluation (ROSE) offers 93 % sensitivity, while alternatives like Macroscopic On-Site Evaluation (MOSE) provide comparable accuracy while reducing dependency on specialized personnel and resources. Image enhancement technologies have markedly improved the ability to characterize lesions. Contrast Harmonic EUS (CH-EUS) is particularly effective in differentiating pancreatic cancer from other solid lesions, with meta-analyses confirming sensitivity and specificity of 94 % and 89 %, respectively. Its ability to detect lesions as small as 15 mm makes it invaluable for early diagnosis. In cystic lesions, CH-EUS excels in identifying malignant mural nodules, with diagnostic accuracies reaching 96 %. The integration of elastography and advanced digital imaging technologies has further expanded diagnostic capabilities. Strain elastography provides qualitative insights into tissue characteristics, while shear wave elastography offers quantitative measurements of stiffness, adding diagnostic precision. Similarly, technologies like detective flow imaging match the accuracy of contrast-enhanced techniques in pancreatic cancer detection and enhance vascular assessment. For cystic lesions, diagnostics have progressed beyond traditional fluid analysis. Techniques such as through-the-needle biopsy (TTNB) have improved diagnostic yields to 74 %, albeit with a modest risk of complications. Incorporating molecular markers and next-generation sequencing allows differentiation between cystic lesion subtypes and more accurate assessment of malignant potential. This array of diagnostic tools offers unprecedented potential for early and precise diagnosis of biliopancreatic lesions. Integrating these innovations into clinical practice requires careful consideration of their strengths and limitations. Future research should aim to standardize protocols and establish evidence-based algorithms for their combined use, with the ultimate goal of improving patient outcomes through earlier detection and tailored management of biliopancreatic pathologies.

Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Classification and Novel Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Diagnosis and Treatment Personalization

The incidence and prevalence of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are steadily increasing. These tumors are highly heterogeneous, with treatment options ranging from observation to surgery, and various medical therapies. The choice of treatment is influenced by factors such as tumor stage, grade (proliferative activity), and the presence of hormone-related syndromes. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is becoming increasingly valuable for assessing pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, offering detailed morphological, vascular, and functional information through techniques such as contrast enhancement and elastography. It also allows biopsies that are useful for both histopathological and molecular analyses. These tumors are highly heterogeneous, with treatment options ranging from observation to various medical therapies and surgery. Recent data suggest that small, non-functioning PanNENs with low proliferation rates may be safely monitored, whereas more aggressive or functioning tumors typically require surgery. EUS-guided ablation is a promising alternative for patients with functional pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms who are unsuitable for surgery, although randomized trials are needed. In non-resectable pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, treatment options include somatostatin analogs, targeted therapies (e.g., everolimus, sunitinib), chemotherapy, and radioligand therapy. This review discusses key factors in planning personalized treatment strategies for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Advances in Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Based Diagnosis of Pancreatic Lesions: Narrative Review

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth deadliest cancer in the U [...].

A convolutional neural network-based system for identifying neuroendocrine neoplasms and multiple types of lesions in the pancreas using EUS (with videos)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

EUS is sensitive in detecting pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (pNEN). However, the endoscopic diagnosis of pNEN is operator-dependent and time-consuming because pNEN mimics normal pancreas and other pancreatic lesions. We intended to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based system, named iEUS, for identifying pNEN and multiple types of pancreatic lesions using EUS.

METHODS

Retrospective data of 12,200 EUS images obtained from pNEN and non-pNEN pancreatic lesions, including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), and pancreatic cystic neoplasm (PCN), were used to develop iEUS, which was composed of a 2-category (pNEN or non-pNEN pancreatic lesions) classification model (CNN1) and a 4-category (pNEN, PDAC, AIP, or PCN) classification model (CNN2). Videos from consecutive patients were prospectively collected for a human-iEUS contest to evaluate the performance of iEUS.

RESULTS

Five hundred seventy-three patients were enrolled in this study. In the human-iEUS contest containing 203 videos, CNN1 and CNN2 showed an accuracy of 84.2% and 88.2% for diagnosing pNEN, respectively, which were significantly higher than that of novices (75.4%) and comparable with intermediate endosonographers (85.5%) and experts (85.5%). In addition, CNN2 showed an accuracy of 86.2%, 97.0%, and 97.0% for diagnosing PDAC, AIP, and PCN, respectively. With the assistance of iEUS, the sensitivity of endosonographers at all 3 levels in diagnosing pNEN has significantly improved (64.6% vs 44.8%, 87.5% vs 71.9%, and 74.0% vs 57.6%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The iEUS precisely diagnosed pNEN and other confusing pancreatic lesions and thus can assist endosonographers in achieving more accessible and accurate endoscopic diagnoses with EUS. (Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR2100049697.).

Contrast-enhanced guided endoscopic ultrasound procedures

Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS) can overcome the limitations of endoscopic ultrasound-guided acquisition by identifying microvessels inside inhomogeneous tumours and improving the characterization of these tumours. Despite the initial enthusiasm that oriented needle sampling under CH-EUS guidance could provide better diagnostic yield in pancreatic solid lesions, further studies did not confirm the supplementary values in cases of tissue acquisition guided by CH-EUS. This review details the knowledge based on the available data on contrast-guided procedures. The indications for CH-EUS tissue acquisition include isoechoic EUS lesions with poor visible delineation where CH-EUS can differentiate the lesion vascularisation from the surrounding parenchyma and also the mural nodules within biliopancreatic cystic lesions, which occur in select cases. Additionally, the roles of CH-EUS-guided therapy in patients whose pancreatic fluid collections or bile ducts that have an echogenic content have indications for drainage, and patients who have nonvisualized vessels that need to be highlighted via Doppler EUS are presented. Another indication is represented if there is a need for an immediate assessment of the post-radiofrequency ablation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours, in which case CH-EUS can be used to reveal the incomplete tumour destruction.

Recent developments in the diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (PanNENs) are characterized by a highly heterogeneous clinical and biological behavior, making their diagnosis challenging. PanNENs diagnostic work-up mainly relies on biochemical markers, pathological examination, and imaging evaluation. The latter includes radiological imaging (i.e. computed tomography [CT] and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]), functional imaging (i.e. 68Gallium [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-peptide PET/CT and Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose [18F]FDG PET/CT), and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with its associated procedures.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides a comprehensive assessment of the recent advancements in the PanNENs diagnostic field. PubMed and Embase databases were used for the research, performed from inception to October 2023.

EXPERT OPINION

A deeper understanding of PanNENs biology, recent technological improvements in imaging modalities, as well as progresses achieved in molecular and cytological assays, are fundamental players for the achievement of early diagnosis and enhanced preoperative characterization of PanNENs. A multimodal diagnostic approach is required for a thorough disease assessment.

European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society (ENETS) 2023 guidance paper for nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

This ENETS guidance paper for well-differentiated nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NF-Pan-NET) has been developed by a multidisciplinary working group, and provides up-to-date and practical advice on the management of these tumours. Using the extensive experience of centres treating patients with NF-Pan-NEN, the authors of this guidance paper discuss 10 troublesome questions in everyday clinical practice. Our many years of experience in this field are still being verified in the light of the results of new clinical, which set new ways of proceeding in NEN. The treatment of NF-Pan-NEN still requires a decision of a multidisciplinary team of specialists in the field of neuroendocrine neoplasms.

A review of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography for pancreatic solid tumors

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is superior to other imaging modalities in the detection of pancreatic masses, although differentiating the types of pancreatic masses detected on EUS remains challenging. However, the value of contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS) using ultrasound contrast agents for this differentiation has been reported. CH-EUS plays a pivotal role in analysis of small lesions that can only be detected with EUS. Recently, CH-EUS was used for staging and/or determining the resectability of pancreatic cancer in several clinical trials. In addition, it is used to estimate the response of pancreatic cancer to chemotherapy and to determine the prognosis in cases of pancreatic cancer and pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. It is also postulated that CH-EUS improves the diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNAB) through complementary diagnoses using CH-EUS and EUS-FNAB, or CH-EUS-guided EUS-FNAB. Thus, CH-EUS has been employed for various qualitative diagnoses, including differentiation of pancreatic masses. Second-generation contrast agents such as Sonazoid are used clinically for ultrasound diagnostic imaging of liver and breast disease. The positioning of CH-EUS with Sonazoid as a test for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic tumors is an issue for further studies.

Current status of the role of endoscopy in evaluation and management of gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

The incidence of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) has increased over the last several decades. In general, NETs are slow-growing neoplasms and the data on the natural history is still evolving. The availability and improved utilization of advanced imaging modalities have allowed the selection of cases suitable for endotherapy. In this regard, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has emerged as a central imaging modality to assess the depth of infiltration in gastroduodenal as well as rectal NETs. Enhanced EUS modalities, including contrast-enhanced EUS and EUS elastography, reliably differentiate pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) from adenocarcinomas and may enable prediction of aggressive PNETs. With recent developments in therapeutic endoscopy, a large proportion of GEP-NETs can be safely managed endoscopically. Endoscopic resection techniques, including endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), allow the safe removal of gastroduodenal and rectal NETs. Recent data indicate that modified EMR techniques may be superior to conventional EMR with regard to histologically complete resection. Device-assisted endoscopic full thickness resection is emerging as a safe and effective technique for upper gastrointestinal as well as rectal NETs. In selected cases with PNETs, who are otherwise unfit for surgery, EUS-guided ablation is increasingly being recognized as a safe treatment option. This review focusses on evidence-based approaches to endoscopic evaluation and the management of GEP-NETs with special emphasis on recent advancements.

Prediction of Pathological Grades of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Based on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Quantitative Analysis

Objective: To investigate whether the dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) analysis and quantitative parameters could be helpful for predicting histopathologic grades of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs). Methods: This retrospective study conducted a comprehensive review of the CEUS database between March 2017 and November 2021 in Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University. Ultrasound examinations were performed by an ACUSON Sequioa unit equipped with a 3.5 MHz 6C−1 convex array transducer, and an ACUSON OXANA2 unit equipped with a 3.5 MHz 5C−1 convex array transducer. SonoVue® (Bracco Inc., Milan, Italy) was used for all CEUS examinations. Time intensity curves (TICs) and quantitative parameters of DCE-US were created by Vuebox® software (Bracco, Italy). Inclusion criteria were: patients with histopathologically proved pNETs, patients who underwent pancreatic B-mode ultrasounds (BMUS) and CEUS scans one week before surgery or biopsy and had DCE-US imaging documented for more than 2 min, patients with solid or predominantly solid lesions and patients with definite diagnosis of histopathological grades of pNETs. Based on their prognosis, patients were categorized into two groups: pNETs G1/G2 group and pNETs G3/pNECs group. Results: A total of 42 patients who underwent surgery (n = 38) or biopsy (n = 4) and had histopathologically confirmed pNETs were included. According to the WHO 2019 criteria, all pNETs were classified into grade 1 (G1, n = 10), grade 2 (G2, n = 21), or grade 3 (G3)/pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (pNECs) (n = 11), based on the Ki−67 proliferation index and the mitotic activity. The majority of the TICs (27/31) of pNETs G1/G2 were above or equal to those of pancreatic parenchyma in the arterial phase, but most (7/11) pNETs G3/pNECs had TICs below those of pancreatic parenchyma from arterial phase to late phase (p < 0.05). Among all the CEUS quantitative parameters of DCE-US, values of relative rise time (rPE), relative mean transit time (rmTT) and relative area under the curve (rAUC) were significantly higher in pNETs G1/G2 group than those in pNETs G3/pNECs group (p < 0.05). Taking an rPE below 1.09 as the optimal cut-off value, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for prediction of pNETs G3/pNECs from G1/G2 were 90.91% [58.70% to 99.80%], 67.64% [48.61% to 83.32%] and 85.78% [74.14% to 97.42%], respectively. Taking rAUC below 0.855 as the optimal cut-off value, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for prediction of pNETs G3/pNECs from G1/G2 were 90.91% [66.26% to 99.53%], 83.87% [67.37% to 92.91%] and 94.72% [88.30% to 100.00%], respectively. Conclusions: Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound analysis might be helpful for predicting the pathological grades of pNETs. Among all quantitative parameters, rPE, rmTT and rAUC are potentially useful parameters for predicting G3/pNECs with aggressive behavior.

Contrast Enhanced EUS for Predicting Solid Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Grade and Aggressiveness

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) behavior assessment is a daily challenge for physicians. Modern PNET management varies from a watch-and-wait strategy to surgery depending on tumor aggressiveness. Therefore, the aggressiveness definition plays a pivotal role in the PNET work-up. The aggressiveness of PNETs is mainly based on the dimensions and histological grading, with sometimes a lack of specificity and sensibility. In the last twenty years, EUS has become a cornerstone in the diagnostic phase of PNET management for its high diagnostic yield and the possibility of obtaining a histological specimen. The number of EUS applications in the PNET work-up has been rapidly increasing with new and powerful possibilities. The application of contrast has led to an important step in PNET detection; in recent years, it has been gaining interesting applications in aggressiveness assessment. In this review, we underline the latest experiences and opportunities in the behavior assessment of PNETs using contact-enhanced EUS and contested enhanced harmonic EUS with a particular focus on the future application and possibility that these techniques could provide.

Differential diagnosis between pancreatic solid pseudopapillary tumors and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors based on contrast enhanced ultrasound imaging features

PURPOSES

To evaluate the application of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in preoperatively differential diagnosis between pancreatic solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPTs) and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was approved by Institutional Review Board. Patients with surgical resection and histopathological diagnosis as SPTs and pNETs were included. All patients underwent B mode ultrasound (BMUS) and CEUS examinations within one week before surgical operation. On BMUS, the size, location, echogenicity, calcification, and margin of lesions were observed and recorded. On CEUS imaging, enhancement patterns, and enhancement degrees were recorded and analyzed. An independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison between continuous variables. Chi-square test was used to compare the CEUS patterns.

RESULTS

From February 2017 to Dec 2022, patients diagnosed as SPTs (n = 39) and pNETs (n = 48) were retrospectively included. On BMUS, anechoic cystic changes (19/39, 48.72%) and hyperechoic calcification (14/39, 35.90%) are more commonly detected in SPTs (P = 0.000). On CEUS imaging, the majority of SPTs (27/39, 69.23%) showed hypo-enhancement in the arterial phase, while most of the pNETs (36/48, 75.00%) showed hyper- or iso-enhancement in the arterial phase (P = 0.000). In the venous phase, most of the SPTs (32/39, 82.05%) showed hypo-enhancement, while over half of pNETs (29/48, 60.42%) showed hyper- or iso-enhancement compared to pancreatic parenchyma (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS is a valuable and non-invasive imaging method to make preoperatively differential diagnoses between SPTs and pNETs.

Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasound for Diagnosis of the Aggressiveness of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasm

The purpose of this study is to clarify the associations between the enhancement patterns on contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS) and the aggressiveness and prognosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs). Patients who underwent CH-EUS and were pathologically diagnosed with PanNEN were included in this study. Patients were divided into three groups according to contrast-enhancement patterns on early-phase and late-phase imaging: “Group A”, vascular rich in both phases; “Group B”, vascular rich and vascular poor in early and late phases, respectively; “Group C”, vascular poor in both phases. Of 39 patients, 25 were assigned to Group A, 7 to Group B, and 7 to Group C. The median overall survival was not reached in Groups A and B and was 335 days in Group C (p < 0.001). The 1-year survival rates were 100% in Group A, 60% in Group B, and 43% in Group C. Patients in Group C showed the shortest overall survival among the three groups. The vascular-poor pattern on late-phase CH-EUS had the highest sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for aggressive PanNENs among the patterns analyzed on CH-EUS and CECT (84.6%, 91.7%, and 89.2%, respectively). CH-EUS is useful for the diagnosis of and predicting the prognosis of PanNENs.

Development and validation of a combined nomogram model based on deep learning contrast-enhanced ultrasound and clinical factors to predict preoperative aggressiveness in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to develop and validate a combined nomogram model based on deep learning (DL) contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and clinical factors to preoperatively predict the aggressiveness of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, consecutive patients with histologically proven PNENs underwent CEUS examination at the initial work-up between January 2010 and October 2020. Patients were randomly allocated to the training and test sets. Typical sonographic and enhanced images of PNENs were selected to fine-tune the SE-ResNeXt-50 network. A combined nomogram model was developed by incorporating the DL predictive probability with clinical factors using multivariate logistic regression analysis. The utility of the proposed model was evaluated using receiver operator characteristic, calibration, and decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 104 patients were evaluated, including 80 (mean age ± standard deviation, 47 years ± 12; 56 males) in the training set and 24 (50 years ± 12; 14 males) in the test set. The DL model displayed effective image recognition with an AUC of 0.81 (95%CI: 0.62-1.00) in the test set. The combined nomogram model that incorporated independent clinical risk factors, such as tumor size, arterial enhancement level, and DL predictive probability, showed strong discrimination, with an AUC of 0.85 (95%CI: 0.69-1.00) in the test set with good calibration. Decision curve analysis verified the clinical usefulness of the combined nomogram.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined nomogram model could serve as a preoperative, noninvasive, and precise evaluation tool to differentiate aggressive and non-aggressive PNENs.

KEY POINTS

• Tumor size (odds ratio [OR], 1.58; p = 0.02), arterial enhancement level (OR, 0.04; p = 0.008), and deep learning predictive probability (OR, 288.46; p < 0.001) independently predicted aggressiveness of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms preoperatively. • The combined model predicted aggressiveness better than the clinical model (AUC: 0.97 vs. 0.87, p = 0.009), achieving AUC values of 0.97 and 0.85 in the training set and the test set, respectively.

Diagnosis, treatment, and current concepts in the endoscopic management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are rare tumors derived from the neuroendocrine cell system, which that have increased in incidence and prevalence in recent years. Despite improvements in radiological and metabolic imaging, endoscopy still plays a pivotal role in the number of GEP-NENs. Tumor detection, characterization, and staging are essential in management and treatment planning. Upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy is essential for correct localization of the primary tumor site of GI NENs. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has an important role in the imaging and tissue acquisition of pancreatic NENs and locoregional staging of GI neuroendocrine tumors. Correct staging and histological diagnosis have important prognostic implications. Endoscopic operating techniques allow the removal of small GI NENs in the early stage of mucosal or submucosal invasion of the intestinal wall. Preoperative EUS-guided techniques may help the surgeon locate small and deep tumors, thus avoiding formal pancreatic resections in favor of parenchymal-sparing surgery. Finally, locoregional ablative treatments have been proposed in recent studies with promising results in selected patients.

Preoperative assessment of microvessel density in nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNETs)

BACKGROUND

Hypervascularization is a typical feature of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, and it frequently allows their recognition at imaging studies. However, the density of microvessels in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors changes according to their biological behavior, and a low microvessel density is associated with higher disease aggressiveness. The primary aim was to investigate the relationship between microvessel density and aggressiveness of nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The secondary aim was to evaluate the ability of contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound in predicting tumor microvessel density.

METHODS

The patients who underwent surgery for nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (n = 66) with an available preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography (n = 39) and/or contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (n = 37) performed at San Raffaele Hospital (2016-2020) were included. The tumor vascularization was assessed by CD-34 staining, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, and contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound. Median microvessel density (165 microvessels/mm²) was chosen as the cutoff to define low microvessel density and high microvessel density.

RESULTS

The patients with a low microvessel density showed a significantly higher frequency of nodal metastases (P = .026), G2-G3 tumors (P = .022), and death domain-associated protein/α-thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked loss (P = .011) compared to patients with high microvessel density. The contrast-enhanced computed tomography tumor density in the arterial phase was significantly higher in patients with high microvessel density compared to those with low microvessel density (P = .016). The patients with a low microvessel density showed a significantly higher frequency of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound arterial hypoenhancement (P = .042) and late washout (P = .034). Contrast-enhanced computed tomography arterial hypoenhancement (P = .007) and contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound late washout (P = .048) independently predicted a low microvessel density in the patients who underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A low microvessel density represents a marker of aggressiveness in the patients with nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound are reliable and easily available tools for preoperative assessment of microvessel density.

Current updates and future directions in diagnosis and management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are a heterogenous group of rare neoplasms that are increasingly being discovered, often incidentally, throughout the gastrointestinal tract with varying degrees of activity and malignant potential. Confusing nomenclature has added to the complexity of managing these lesions. The term carcinoid tumor and embryonic classification have been replaced with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm, which includes gastrointestinal neuroendocrine and pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. A comprehensive multidisciplinary approach is important for clinicians to diagnose, stage and manage these lesions. While histological diagnosis is the gold standard, recent advancements in endoscopy, conventional imaging, functional imaging, and serum biomarkers complement histology for tailoring specific treatment options. In light of developing technology, our review sets out to characterize diagnostic and therapeutic advancements for managing gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, including innovations in radiolabeled peptide imaging, circulating biomarkers, and endoscopic treatment approaches adapted to different locations throughout the gastrointestinal system.

Differentiation Between Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas and Nonfunctional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasm Using Endoscopic Ultrasound

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the utility of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for differentiating between solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas (SPN) and pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (PanNEN).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 29 and 77 consecutive patients with pathologically proven SPN and nonfunctional PanNEN. In patients who underwent contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS), lesions were classified into 3 vascular patterns (hypoechoic/isoechoic/hyperechoic), and the presence of "the alveolus nest sign," which we previously reported as a characteristic feature of SPN on CH-EUS, was also assessed.

RESULTS

Conventional EUS findings showed that calcification echoes were significantly more frequent in SPN lesions than in PanNEN lesions (19/29 [66%] vs 21/77 [27%], P = 0.001) as was internal isoechogenicity or hyperechogenicity (10/29 [34%] vs 11/77 [14%], P = 0.029). Contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS findings showed that SPN lesions more frequently had the isoechoic or hypoechoic vascular pattern, and significantly more frequently had the alveolus nest sign (18/25 [72%] vs 4/60 [7%], P < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis, the presence of the alveolus nest sign contributed the most to the SPN diagnosis (odds ratio, 70; 95% confidence interval, 6.2-786).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic ultrasound, particularly the presence of the alveolus nest sign on CH-EUS, is useful for differentiating SPN from PanNEN.

Differentiation between pancreatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma and pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm using endoscopic ultrasound

OBJECTIVES

Pancreatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) often appear many years after treatment of the primary tumor, and differentiation from pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (PanNEN) can be challenging due to their hypervascularity. Here, we investigated the utility of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for differentiation of these conditions.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed in 17 and 79 consecutive patients with pathologically proven PRCC and non-functional PanNEN who were examined by EUS. In cases examined by EUS elastography or contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS), the lesions were classified as stiff or soft, or into three vascular patterns as hypoechoic, isoechoic, and hyperechoic. CH-EUS images at 20 s, 40 s, 60 s, 3 min and 5 min were used for evaluation. EUS images were independently reviewed by two readers who were blinded to all clinical information.

RESULTS

The patients with PRCC were significantly older than those with PanNEN (median, 71 (range, 45-81) vs. 58 (22-76), P = 0.001) and more often had multiple tumors (6/17 (35%) vs. 7/79 (9%), P = 0.010). In EUS findings, PRCC lesions significantly more frequently had a marginal hypoechoic zone (MHZ) (11/17 (65%) vs. 27/79 (34%), P = 0.028), being classified as soft (12/13 (92%) vs. 26/58 (45%), P = 0.002), and showed sustained hyperechoic vascular patterns at 5 min (7/8 (88%) vs. 4/59 (7%), P < 0.001) compared to PanNEN lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of a MHZ, a soft lesion, and a sustained hyperechoic vascular pattern in EUS may be useful for differentiating PRCC from PanNEN.

Utility of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography for predicting the prognosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs), including Grade 1 (G1) or G2 tumors, can have a poor prognosis. This study investigated the value of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography (CH-EUS) for predicting the prognosis of PanNENs.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective study included 47 consecutive patients who underwent CH-EUS and were diagnosed with PanNEN by surgical resection or EUS-guided fine needle aspiration between December 2011 and February 2016. Patients were divided into aggressive and non-aggressive groups according to the degree of clinical malignancy. CH-EUS was assessed regarding its capacity for diagnosing aggressive PanNEN, the correspondence between contrast patterns and pathological features, and its ability to predict the prognosis of PanNEN.

RESULTS

There were 19 cases of aggressive PanNEN and 28 cases of non-aggressive PanNEN. The aggressive group included three G1, four G2, three G3 tumors, three mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms, and six neuroendocrine carcinomas. CH-EUS was superior to contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the diagnosis of aggressive PanNEN (P < 0.001): hypo-enhancement on CH-EUS was an indicator of aggressive PanNEN, with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of 94.7%, 100%, 100%, 96.6%, and 97.9%, respectively. Among G1/G2 PanNENs, cases with hypo-enhancement on CH-EUS had a poorer prognosis than those with hyper/iso-enhancement (P = 0.0009). Assessment of 36 resected specimens showed that hypo-enhancement on CH-EUS was associated with smaller and fewer vessels and greater degree of fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography may be useful for predicting the prognosis of PanNENs.

Diagnostic and Interventional Role of Endoscopic Ultrasonography for the Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) are relatively rare, but their incidence has increased significantly in the last decades. Precise diagnosis and prognostic stratification are crucial for proper patient management. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is the modality of choice for diagnosis of solid pancreatic tumors, showing a higher tumor detection rate than other imaging modalities, especially for small size lesions. EUS also serves as a guide for preoperative sampling and other interventions. EUS-tissue acquisition is a safe and highly accurate technique for cyto/histological diagnosis of PanNENs with a well-demonstrated correlation between Ki-67 proliferation index values and tumor grading on EUS and surgical specimens according to the WHO 2017 classification. Furthermore, the possibility of a preoperative EUS-guided fine needle tattooing or fiducial markers placement may help the surgeon to locate small and deep tumors, thus avoiding formal pancreatic resections in favor of parenchymal-sparing surgery. Finally, locoregional ablative treatments using either ethanol injection or radiofrequency ablation have been proposed in recent studies with promising results in order to control symptoms or reduce tumor burden in selected patients unfit for surgery with functioning or non-functioning PanNENs. This article review highlights the current role of EUS in PanNENs management, focusing on the present and future applications of EUS-guided interventions.

The Asian Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (AFSUMB) Guidelines for Contrast-Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasound

The Asian Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology aimed to provide information on techniques and indications for contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS), and to create statements including the level of recommendation. These statements are based on current scientific evidence reviewed by a Consensus Panel of 15 internationally renowned experts. The reliability of clinical questions was measured by agreement rates after voting. Six statements were made on techniques, including suitable contrast agents for CH-EUS, differences between contrast agents, setting of mechanical index, dual imaging and duration and phases for observation. Thirteen statements were made on indications, including pancreatic solid masses, pancreatic cancer staging, pancreatic cystic lesions and mural nodules, detection of subtle pancreatic lesions, gallbladder sludge and polyps, hepatic lesions, lymph nodes, subepithelial lesions, visceral vascular diseases, guidance of fine needle aspiration and evaluation for local therapy. These international expert consensus guidelines will assist endosonographers in conducting CH-EUS according to evidence-based information.

Endoscopic Ultrasound Features Associated with Malignancy and Aggressiveness of Nonhypovascular Solid Pancreatic Lesions: Results from a Prospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

 On contrast-enhanced imaging studies, nonhypovascular (i. e., isovascular and hypervascular) patterns can be observed in solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs) of different nature, prognosis, and management. We aimed to identify endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) features of nonhypovascular SPLs associated with malignancy/aggressiveness. The secondary aims were EUS tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) outcome and safety in this setting of patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

 This prospective observational study included patients with nonhypovascular SPLs detected on cross-sectional imaging and referred for EUS-TA. Lesion features (size, site, margins, echotexture, vascular pattern, and upstream dilation of the main pancreatic duct) were recorded. Malignancy/aggressiveness was determined by evidence of carcinoma at biopsy/surgical pathology, signs of aggressiveness (perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and/or microscopic tumor extension/infiltration or evidence of metastatic lymph nodes) in the surgical specimen, radiologic detection of lymph nodes or distant metastases, and/or tumor growth > 5 mm/6 months. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the primary aim.

RESULTS

 A total of 154 patients with 161 SPLs were enrolled. 40 (24.8 %) lesions were defined as malignant/aggressive. Irregular margins and size > 20 mm were independent factors associated with malignancy/aggressiveness (p < 0.001, OR = 5.2 and p = 0.003, OR = 2.1, respectively). However, size > 20 mm was not significant in the subgroup of other-than-neuroendocrine tumor (NET) lesions. The EUS-TA accuracy was 92 %, and the rate of adverse events was 4 %.

CONCLUSION

 Irregular margins on EUS are associated with malignancy/aggressiveness of nonhypovascular SPLs. Size > 20 mm should be considered a malignancy-related feature only in NET patients. EUS-TA is safe and highly accurate for differential diagnosis in this group of patients.

Endoscopic ultrasound elastography for small solid pancreatic lesions with or without main pancreatic duct dilatation

BACKGROUND

/Objectives: Endoscopic ultrasound elastography (EUS-EG) is useful for diagnosis of small solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs), particularly in excluding pancreatic cancer (PC), but its dependence on main pancreatic duct dilatation (MPDD) has not been examined. We aimed to investigate EUS-EG for diagnosis of small SPLs with and without MPDD.

METHODS

Patients with pathologically diagnosed SPLs of ≤20 mm were included and retrospectively analyzed. Using the blue:green ratio, an EUS-EG image was classified as blue-dominant, equivalent, or green-dominant. Using multiple EUS-EG images per patient, a lesion with a greater number of blue-dominant than green-dominant images was classified as stiff, and the others as soft. EUS-EG images in random order were judged by three raters. Considering stiff SPLs as PC, diagnostic performance of EUS-EG was examined for SPLs with and without MPDD.

RESULTS

Of 126 cases analyzed, 65 (52%) were diagnosed as PC, and 63 (50%) had MPDD. A total of 1077 EUS-EG images were examined (kappa coefficient = 0.783). Lesions were classified as stiff in 91 cases and soft in 35 (kappa coefficient = 0.932). The ratio of stiff to soft lesions was significantly higher in PC than in non-PC (62:3 vs. 29:32, P < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value of a stiff lesion with vs. without MPDD for diagnosis of PC were 94%, 23%, and 50% vs. 100%, 60%, and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the EUS-EG stiffness classification for small SPLs, PC can be excluded with high confidence and concordance for a soft lesion without MPDD.

Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Although pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs) are relatively rare tumors, their number is increasing with advances in diagnostic imaging modalities. Even small lesions that are difficult to detect using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging can now be detected with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Contrast-enhanced EUS is useful, and not only diagnosis but also malignancy detection has become possible by evaluating the vascularity of tumors. Pathological diagnosis using EUS with fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is useful when diagnostic imaging is difficult. EUS-FNA can also be used to evaluate the grade of malignancy. Pooling the data of the studies that compared the PNENs grading between EUS-FNA samples and surgical specimens showed a concordance rate of 77.5% (κ-statistic = 0.65, 95% confidence interval = 0.59–0.71, p < 0.01). Stratified analysis for small tumor size (2 cm) showed that the concordance rate was 84.5% and the kappa correlation index was 0.59 (95% confidence interval = 0.43–0.74, p < 0.01). The evolution of ultrasound imaging technologies such as contrast-enhanced and elastography and the artificial intelligence that analyzes them, the evolution of needles, and genetic analysis, will further develop the diagnosis and treatment of PNENs in the future.

Interobserver Reliability of Endoscopic Ultrasonography: Literature Review

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has been applied to the diagnosis of various digestive disorders. Although it has been widely accepted and its diagnostic value is high, the dependence of EUS diagnosis on image interpretation done by the endosonographer has persisted as an important difficulty. Consequently, high interobserver reliability (IOR) in EUS diagnosis is important to demonstrate the reliability of EUS diagnosis. We reviewed the literature on the IOR of EUS diagnosis for various diseases such as chronic pancreatitis, pancreatic solid/cystic mass, lymphadenopathy, and gastrointestinal and subepithelial lesions. The IOR of EUS diagnosis differs depending on the disease; moreover, EUS findings with high IOR and those with IOR that was not necessarily high were used as diagnostic criteria. Therefore, to further increase the value of EUS diagnosis, EUS diagnostic criteria with high diagnostic characteristics based on EUS findings with high IOR must be established.

Advances in Interventional Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS): A Technical Review

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become the therapeutic intervention of choice for multiple diseases and continues to evolve rapidly. Its increasing use has allowed the development and adaptation of multiple, revolutionary devices and tools. Currently, there is paucity of randomized clinical trials evaluating multiple EUS-guided interventions and the vast majority of published data is heterogenous. However, the available literature on EUS-guided therapeutic interventions continues to expand and demonstrate its safety, efficacy and cost effectiveness in carefully selected patients when performed by expert endosonographers. The future of interventional EUS appears to be bright!

Digestive Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (NEN): French Intergroup clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up (SNFGE, GTE, RENATEN, TENPATH, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, SFR)

INTRODUCTION

This document is a summary of the French Intergroup guidelines regarding the management of digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) published in February 2020 (www.tncd.org).

METHODS

All French medical societies involved in the management of NEN took part in this work. Recommendations were graded into four categories (A, B, C or D), according to the level of evidence found in the literature until May 2019.

RESULTS

The management of NEN is challenging because of their heterogeneity and the increasing complexity of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Pathological analysis is required for their diagnostic and prognostic characterization, which mainly relies on differentiation, grade and stage. The two main emergency situations are functioning syndromes and poorly-differentiated carcinoma. Chromogranin A is the main biochemical marker of NET, although of limited clinical interest. Initial characterization relies on morphological and isotopic imaging. The treatment of localized NET relies on watchful follow-up and local or surgical resection depending on its supposed aggressiveness. Treatment options for metastatic disease include surgery, somatostatin analogues, chemotherapy, targeted therapies, organ-driven locoregional therapies and peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy. As specific predictive factors of treatment efficacy are yet to be identified and head-to-head comparisons have not or only rarely been performed, the therapeutic strategy currently depends on prognostic factors. Cumulative toxicity and the impact of treatment on quality of life must be considered since survival is relatively long in most patients with NET.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines are proposed to achieve the most beneficial therapeutic strategy in clinical practice as the therapeutic landscape of NEN is becoming ever more complex. These recommendations are permanently being reviewed.

Calcitonin-negative neuroendocrine tumor of the thyroid with metastasis to liver-rare presentation of an unusual tumor: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine tumors mainly occur in the stomach, intestine, pancreas, and lung and are rarely detected in the thyroid. Thyroid neuroendocrine tumors, designated medullary thyroid carcinoma, generally present with elevated calcitonin. Calcitonin-negative neuroendocrine tumors of the thyroid are extremely rare.

CASE SUMMARY

Here, we present a case report of a 56-year-old female patient with a neck pain complaint. Total thyroidectomy was conducted after comprehensive evaluation, and diagnosis was confirmed as calcitonin-negative neuroendocrine tumor of the thyroid. Two months later, liver metastasis was detected, and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization was subsequently performed to control growth. However, the curative effect was unsatisfactory and multiple intrahepatic metastases occurred after 3 mo.

CONCLUSION

Owing to the rarity of this disease, no clear guidelines are available for treatment. In addition to reporting this rare case, we have reviewed and summarized associated medical literature with an aim to provide a comprehensive reference platform for subsequent research.

Do we need contrast agents for EUS?

We recently introduced a series of articles that dealt with controversies in EUS. In Part I, the authors discussed which clinical information is necessary prior to EUS and whether other imaging modalities are required before embarking on EUS examinations. Part II focuses on technical details and controversies about the use of EUS in special situations. In this article, important practical issues regarding the application of contrast-enhanced EUS in various clinical settings are raised and controversially discussed from different points of view.

Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound using time-intensity curve analysis predicts pathological grade of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm

PURPOSE

Histological grading is important for the treatment algorithm in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNEN). The present study examined the efficacy of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS) and time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis of PNEN diagnosis and grading.

METHODS

TIC analysis was performed in 30 patients using data obtained from CH-EUS, and a histopathological diagnosis was made via EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration or surgical resection. The TIC parameters were analyzed by dividing them into G1/G2 and G3/NEC groups. Then, patients were classified into non-aggressive and aggressive groups and evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were classified as G1/G2, and four as G3/NEC. From the TIC analysis, five parameters were obtained (I: echo intensity change, II: time for peak enhancement, III: speed of contrast, IV: decrease rate for enhancement, and V: enhancement ratio for node/pancreatic parenchyma). Three of these parameters (I, IV, and V) showed high diagnostic performance. Using the cutoff value obtained from the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the correct diagnostic rates of parameters I, IV, and V were 96.7%, 100%, and 100%, respectively, between G1/G2 and G3/NEC. A total of 21 patients were classified into the non-aggressive group, and nine into the aggressive group. Using the cutoff value obtained from the ROC analysis, the accurate diagnostic rates of I, IV, and V were 86.7%, 86.7%, and 88.5%, respectively, between the non-aggressive and aggressive groups.

CONCLUSION

CH-EUS and TIC analysis showed high diagnostic accuracy for grade diagnosis of PNEN. Quantitative perfusion analysis is useful to predict PNEN grade diagnosis preoperatively.

EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation as an alternative to surgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Who should we treat?

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) are rare tumors, but their incidental diagnosis has significantly increased due to the widespread use of imaging studies. Therefore, most PanNENs are now diagnosed when completely asymptomatic and in early stages. PanNENs are classified according to their grade (Ki-67 index) and can be functional (F-) or nonfunctional (NF-) depending on the presence or absence of a clinical, hormonal hypersecretion syndrome. The mainstay treatment of PanNENs is a surgery that is mostly curative but also associated with significant short- and long-term adverse events. Therefore, less invasive alternative locoregional treatment modalities are warranted. Recently, few case reports and two case series have described EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) for the treatment of patients with both F-PanNENs and NF-PanNENs. If for F-PanNENs EUS-RFA can very easily become the standard of care, for NF-PanNENEs it is still controversial how to select patients for EUS-RFA. A balance between overtreatment (i.e., RFA/surgery in patients who will not progress) and undertreatment (locoregional treatments in patients with undetected metastases) needs to be found based on solid data. The decision should also take into account patients’ comorbidity and risk of postoperative death, life expectancy, tumor location, risk of postoperative fistula and postoperative morbidity, and risk of long-term exocrine and/or endocrine insufficiency. To answer the important question on which a patient should be treated with EUS-RFA, properly designed studies to evaluate the efficacy of this treatment in large cohorts of patients with NF-PanNENs and to establish prognostic factors associated with treatment response are urgently needed.

Simple Vascular Architecture Classification in Predicting Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Grade and Prognosis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Vascularity is a critical feature in the evaluation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET). When done by EUS, contrast agents are recommended. However, vascular architecture (VA) can also be evaluated by routine Doppler flow in EUS without contrast agents. Our aim was to provide a simple VA classification in EUS for PNET grade and prognosis.

METHODS

All pathologically proven PNET cases with EUS between 2012 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The Doppler imaging was retrieved for VA classification. Predictive model construction was performed by machine learning algorithms.

RESULTS

A total of 112 PNET cases were evaluated, among which 93 cases were subjected to VA classification. The VA was classified into type A (peritumoral with or without intratumoral vessels [A1 or A2]); type B (only intratumoral vessels); and type C (flow was absent). The VA classification was significantly correlated with tumor grades: 74% type A1 was G1, 73% type B was G2, and 58% type C was G3. Multivariate analysis indicated that elevated serum CA19-9 and type C classification were the independent predictors of G3 tumor. Five machine learning models were constructed, among which random forest was the best one with an AUC of 0.9972. Low-risk patients classified by this model exhibited better prognosis than high-risk patients (p = 0.0087).

CONCLUSIONS

In the novel simple VA classification, peritumoral, intratumoral, and absent vessels are prone to be G1, G2, and G3, respectively. Combined with serum CA19-9 and lesion size, the VA classification could predict tumor grade and prognosis in PNET.