1
|
Vemulapalli KC, Lahr RE, Rex DK. Most large colorectal polyps missed by gastroenterology fellows at colonoscopy are sessile serrated lesions. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E659-E663. [PMID: 35571477 PMCID: PMC9106434 DOI: 10.1055/a-1784-0959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Data on adenoma and sessile serrated lesion (SSL) miss rates for gastroenterology fellows during colonoscopy are limited. We aimed to describe the miss rate of fellows based on a second examination by a colonoscopist with a high rate of detection. Patients and methods Second- and third-year gastroenterology fellows at a single, tertiary center performed initial examinations. A single experienced attending doctor then performed a complete examination of the colon. We recorded the size and pathology of all lesions found at both examinations and calculated the adenoma and SSL miss rates for fellows. Results Ten trainees performed 100 examinations. Miss rates for conventional adenomas and SSLs were 30.5 % and 85.7 %, respectively. Among pre-cancerous polyps ≥ 10 mm, 10 of 14 lesions missed were SSLs. Conclusions While conventional adenoma detection skills of gastroenterology fellows are acceptable, SSL detection is poor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishna C. Vemulapalli
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
| | - Rachel E. Lahr
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
| | - Douglas K. Rex
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cheng CL, Kuo YL, Hsieh YH, Tang JH, Leung FW. Comparison of Right Colon Adenoma Miss Rates Between Water Exchange and Carbon Dioxide Insufflation: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Gastroenterol 2021; 55:869-875. [PMID: 33074950 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
GOALS To test the hypothesis that water exchange (WE), when compared with carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation, significantly reduces the right colon adenoma miss rate (rAMR) in a blinded randomized controlled trial with cap-assisted colonoscopy. BACKGROUND The unblinded consecutive group observational data showed that WE significantly decreased rAMR. The unblinded data are limited by potential bias. STUDY Consecutive patients aged 45 years or more were randomized to undergo insertion with WE or CO2. Withdrawal and polypectomy were performed with CO2 in both groups to the hepatic flexure. The colonoscope was reinserted to the cecum. A second colonoscopist re-examined the right colon. The second colonoscopist was unaware, but made a guess, of the initial insertion method. The number of additional adenomas divided by the total number detected in both examinations equaled rAMR. RESULTS Among 262 patients (131/group), demographic variables were similar. The body mass index was significantly higher in the WE group. Compared with CO2, WE significantly decreased rAMR [18.0% (33/183) vs. 34.6% (62/179), P=0.0025] and right colon serrated polyp miss rate [17.4% (27/155) vs. 39.3% (33/84), P=0.002]. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that WE was an independent predictor of rAMR (odds ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.86), and so was ≥2 adenomas in the right colon (odds ratio, 2.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-4.76). Whether the second colonoscopist guessed the insertion method correctly or not, and demographic and procedure variables were not associated with rAMR. CONCLUSIONS The randomized controlled trial validated unblinded observational data showing that WE significantly decreased rAMR and right colon serrated polyp miss rate (clinical trial registration number: NCT03845933).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yen-Lin Kuo
- Department of Medicine, Evergreen General Hospital, Taoyuan
| | - Yu-Hsi Hsieh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi
| | - Jui-Hsiang Tang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Felix W Leung
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Sepulveda Ambulatory Care Center, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System and David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, North Hills and Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tseng CW, Hsieh YH. Use of water immersion instead of water exchange underlay the unfavourable outcomes in the water-assisted sigmoidoscopy (WAS) study. Gut 2021; 70:1803-1804. [PMID: 33148553 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Wei Tseng
- Department of Medicine, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Hsi Hsieh
- Department of Medicine, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi, Taiwan .,School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cadoni S, Ishaq S, Hassan C, Falt P, Fuccio L, Siau K, Leung JW, Anderson J, Binmoeller KF, Radaelli F, Rutter MD, Sugimoto S, Muhammad H, Bhandari P, Draganov PV, de Groen P, Wang AY, Yen AW, Hamerski C, Thorlacius H, Neumann H, Ramirez F, Mulder CJJ, Albéniz E, Amato A, Arai M, Bak A, Barret M, Bayupurnama P, Cheung R, Ching HL, Cohen H, Dolwani S, Friedland S, Harada H, Hsieh YH, Hayee B, Kuwai T, Lorenzo-Zúñiga V, Liggi M, Mizukami T, Mura D, Nylander D, Olafsson S, Paggi S, Pan Y, Parra-Blanco A, Ransford R, Rodriguez-Sanchez J, Senturk H, Suzuki N, Tseng CW, Uchima H, Uedo N, Leung FW. Water-assisted colonoscopy: an international modified Delphi review on definitions and practice recommendations. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93:1411-1420.e18. [PMID: 33069706 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Since 2008, a plethora of research studies has compared the efficacy of water-assisted (aided) colonoscopy (WAC) and underwater resection (UWR) of colorectal lesions with standard colonoscopy. We reviewed and graded the research evidence with potential clinical application. We conducted a modified Delphi consensus among experienced colonoscopists on definitions and practice of water immersion (WI), water exchange (WE), and UWR. METHODS Major databases were searched to obtain research reports that could potentially shape clinical practice related to WAC and UWR. Pertinent references were graded (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Extracted data supporting evidence-based statements were tabulated and provided to respondents. We received responses from 55 (85% surveyed) experienced colonoscopists (37 experts and 18 nonexperts in WAC) from 16 countries in 3 rounds. Voting was conducted anonymously in the second and third round, with ≥80% agreement defined as consensus. We aimed to obtain consensus in all statements. RESULTS In the first and the second modified Delphi rounds, 20 proposed statements were decreased to 14 and then 11 statements. After the third round, the combined responses from all respondents depicted the consensus in 11 statements (S): definitions of WI (S1) and WE (S2), procedural features (S3-S5), impact on bowel cleanliness (S6), adenoma detection (S7), pain score (S8), and UWR (S9-S11). CONCLUSIONS The most important consensus statements are that WI and WE are not the same in implementation and outcomes. Because studies that could potentially shape clinical practice of WAC and UWR were chosen for review, this modified Delphi consensus supports recommendations for the use of WAC in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Cadoni
- CTO Hospital, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Iglesias, Italy
| | - Sauid Ishaq
- Russell Hall, Dept. of Gastroenterology, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Birmingham City University, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Rome, Italy
| | - Přemysl Falt
- University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic; Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | - Lorenzo Fuccio
- S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Bologna, Italy
| | - Keith Siau
- JAG Clinical Fellow, JAG, Royal College of Physicians, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph W Leung
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sacramento VA Medical Center and University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - John Anderson
- Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom
| | - Kenneth F Binmoeller
- California Pacific Medical Center, Interventional Endoscopy Services, San Francisco, California, United States
| | | | - Matt D Rutter
- University Hospital North Tees NHS, Department of Gastroenterology, Stockton-on-Tees, United Kingdom; Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom
| | - Shinya Sugimoto
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Pradeep Bhandari
- Portsmouth University Hospital, Dept. of Gastroenterology, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
| | | | - Piet de Groen
- University of Minnesota, Division of Gastroenterology, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
| | - Andrew Y Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
| | - Andrew W Yen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sacramento VA Medical Center and University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Chris Hamerski
- California Pacific Medical Center, Interventional Endoscopy Services, San Francisco, California, United States
| | - Henrik Thorlacius
- Lund University Surgery, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Helmut Neumann
- University Medical Center, Interventional Endoscopy Center, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Chris J J Mulder
- VU University Medical Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eduardo Albéniz
- Gastroenterology Department, Endoscopy Unit, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Arnaldo Amato
- Ospedale Valduce, Gastroenterology Unit, Como, Italy
| | - Makoto Arai
- Chiba University, Gastroenterology Department, Chiba, Japan
| | - Adrian Bak
- University of British Columbia, Department of Medicine, Kelowna, Canada
| | | | - Putut Bayupurnama
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Gadjah Mada University, Sardjito General Hospital, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
| | - Ramsey Cheung
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, VA Palo Alto, California, United States
| | - Hey-Long Ching
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Gastroenterology Department, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Hartley Cohen
- Department of Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, United States; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Department of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Sunil Dolwani
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Shai Friedland
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, VA Palo Alto, California, United States
| | - Hideaki Harada
- Department of Gastroenterology, New Tokyo Hospital, Gastroenterology, Matsudo, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yu-Hsi Hsieh
- Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin Township, Taiwan
| | - Bu Hayee
- King's College Hospital NHS foundation Trust, Gastroenterology Department, London, United Kingdom
| | - Toshio Kuwai
- NHO Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Gastroenterology Department, Kure, Japan
| | | | - Mauro Liggi
- ASSL Carbonia, Sirai Hospital, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Carbonia, Italy
| | - Takeshi Mizukami
- NHO Kurihama Medical and Addiction Center, Endoscopy Center, Yokosuka, Japan
| | - Donatella Mura
- ASSL Carbonia, Sirai Hospital, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Carbonia, Italy
| | - David Nylander
- Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Gastroenterology Department, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Snorri Olafsson
- Telemark Hospital, Gastroenterology Department, Skien, Norway
| | - Silvia Paggi
- Ospedale Valduce, Gastroenterology Unit, Como, Italy
| | - Yanglin Pan
- Xijing Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology, Xian, Republic of China
| | - Adolfo Parra-Blanco
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Department of Gastroenterology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Rupert Ransford
- Endoscopy Department Hereford County Hospital, Hereford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Hakan Senturk
- Bezmialem Vakif University Medicine Faculty, Department of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Noriko Suzuki
- Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Chih-Wei Tseng
- Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin Township, Taiwan
| | - Hugo Uchima
- Hospital Germans Triasi i Pujol, Teknon Medical Center, Gastroenterology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Noriya Uedo
- Osaka International Cancer Institute, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka, Japan
| | - Felix W Leung
- Department of Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, United States; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Department of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yang SY, Quan SY, Friedland S, Pan JY. Predictive factors for adenoma detection rates: a video study of endoscopist practices. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9:E216-E223. [PMID: 33553584 PMCID: PMC7857972 DOI: 10.1055/a-1321-0990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims In 2015, the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) and American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) Task Force on Quality in Endoscopy deemed adenoma detection rate (ADR) the most important quality measure for colonoscopy. There has been much interest in factors that can increase ADR. To date, however, few studies have looked at what intra-procedural endoscopist practices are associated with improving ADR. We conducted a retrospective review of colonoscopy videos to evaluate intra-procedural practices that could be associated with ADR. Methods Videos were recorded of colonoscopies performed between September and December 2017 at the Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Health Care System. Colonoscopies for screening and surveillance were included for video review. Factors assessed included withdrawal time, intra-procedural cleaning, inspection technique, and other variables (colon distention, removal of equivocal/hyperplastic polyps). A series of multiple regression analyses was conducted on variables of interest before running a final model of significant predictors. Results A total of 130 videos were reviewed from nine endoscopists whose ADRs ranged between 37.5 % and 73.7 %. The final regression model was significant (F = 15.35, df = 2, P = 0.0044), R 2 = 0.8365) with close inspection of behind folds and quality of cecal inspection being the factors highly correlated with predicting ADR. Withdrawal and inspection times, colonic wall distention, removal of equivocal/hyperplastic polyps, quality of rectal inspection, suctioning, and washing were factors moderately correlated with predicting ADR. Conclusions We found that behind-fold inspection and a meticulous cecal inspection technique were predictive of a high ADR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sun Young Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Susan Y. Quan
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, United States,Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States
| | - Shai Friedland
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, United States,Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States
| | - Jennifer Y. Pan
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, United States,Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
El Rahyel A, McWhinney CD, Parsa N, Lahr RE, Vemulapalli KC, Rex DK. Room temperature water infusion during colonoscopy insertion induces rectosigmoid colon mucus production. Endoscopy 2020; 52:1118-1121. [PMID: 32458999 DOI: 10.1055/a-1182-5211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Water filling during colonoscopy improves several colonoscopy outcomes. We evaluated an anecdotal observation that room temperature water filling during colonoscope insertion results in mucus production in the left colon, which may impair mucosal visualization during withdrawal. METHODS We performed 55 colonoscopies with either water or saline filling during insertion, and video recorded the examinations. Three blinded observers scored the amount of mucus visible on the video recordings. RESULTS 29 patients had water filling and 26 patients had saline filling during insertion. Demographic features, procedure indications, volume of infused fluid, and insertion time to the cecum were similar in the two groups. All three blinded observers rated the mucus as greater after water filling than after saline (median 3 out of 5 vs. 1 out of 5; P < 0.001), with a kappa value for interobserver agreement of 0.364 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Room temperature water filling is associated with mucus production by the rectosigmoid colon, requiring additional cleansing during withdrawal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed El Rahyel
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Connor D McWhinney
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Nasim Parsa
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Rachel E Lahr
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Krishna C Vemulapalli
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hwang JH, Jamidar P, Kyanam Kabir Baig KR, Leung FW, Lightdale JR, Maranki JL, Okolo PI, Swanstrom LL, Chak A. GIE Editorial Board top 10 topics: advances in GI endoscopy in 2019. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92:241-251. [PMID: 32470427 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy's GIE Editorial Board reviewed original endoscopy-related articles published during 2019 in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and 10 other leading medical and gastroenterology journals. Votes from each individual member were tallied to identify a consensus list of 10 topic areas of major advances in GI endoscopy. Individual board members summarized important findings published in these 10 areas of disinfection, artificial intelligence, bariatric endoscopy, adenoma detection, polypectomy, novel imaging, Barrett's esophagus, third space endoscopy, interventional EUS, and training. This document summarizes these "top 10" endoscopic advances of 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joo Ha Hwang
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Priya Jamidar
- Professor of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - Felix W Leung
- Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System and David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
| | - Jennifer R Lightdale
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Umass Memorial Childrens Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | | | - Patrick I Okolo
- Executive Medical Director, Rochester Regional Health Systems, Rochester, NY
| | - Lee L Swanstrom
- Professor of Surgery, Oregon Health and Sciences University: Scientific Director and Chief Innovations Officer, Institutes Hospitalos Universitaires (IHU-Strasbourg) University of Strasbourg
| | - Amitabh Chak
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Anderson JC, Srivastava A. Colorectal Cancer Screening for the Serrated Pathway. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2020; 30:457-478. [PMID: 32439082 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2020.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Serrated polyps are classified into hyperplastic polyps, sessile serrated adenomas/polyps, and traditional serrated adenomas. Although all serrated polyps share characteristic colonic crypts serrations, distinguishing hyperplastic polyps from sessile serrated adenomas/polyps is challenging. Traditional serrated adenomas are cytologically dysplastic lesions; sessile serrated adenomas/polyps develop cytologic dysplasia as they progress to colorectal cancer. A flat and pale appearance of serrated polyps may make detection difficult. Endoscopic mucosal resection has higher rates of complete resection. Close surveillance is recommended for sessile serrated adenomas/polyps, sessile serrated adenomas/polyp with dysplasia, hyperplastic polyps ≥10 mm, and traditional serrated adenomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph C Anderson
- Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT, USA; The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, 1 Rope Ferry Road, Hanover, NH 03755, USA; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT 06030, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Anderson JC. Use of Total Underwater Colonoscopy to Navigate Endoscopic Challenges. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18:1427-1430. [PMID: 32109632 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.02.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2020] [Revised: 02/05/2020] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph C Anderson
- Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont; The Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth Medical, Hanover, New Hampshire; Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Blanco Velasco G, Zamarripa-Mottú RA, Soria-Rodríguez R, Solórzano-Pineda OM, Blancas Valencia JM, Murcio-Pérez E, Hernandez Mondragón ÓV. Efficacy and safety of water-exchange enteroscopy compared to carbon dioxide insufflation during enteroscopy. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS 2020; 112:258-261. [PMID: 32122147 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.6788/2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation during enteroscopy reduces procedure time and subsequent symptoms and increases the insertion depth compared with room air. In colonoscopy, the water-exchange (WE) technique is associated with less pain compared with CO2 insufflation. The WE technique is not well studied in enteroscopy. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of enteroscopy with WE and CO2. METHODS a prospective, comparative and observational study was performed of double balloon enteroscopies (DBE) that were randomized in two groups. The first group used WE while the second group used CO2 insufflation. The data collected was evaluated via univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression (variables with p ≤ 0.10 according to the univariate analysis). RESULTS forty-six DBE were included; 23 in each arm. The median age of cases was 63.5 years and 37% were female. There were no statistical differences between the groups with regard to the access route, findings, therapy and complications. Four patients (20%) in the CO2 group had adverse events (abdominal distension and pain) and one in the WE group (nausea), which was not statistically significant. The median insertion depth was greater in the CO2 group; 260 cm vs 160 cm (p = 0.048). Multiple logistic regression showed a statistically significant difference in the insertion depth using CO2 insufflation (OR 1.009, 1.001-1.017; p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS DBE with a CO2 insufflation technique and WE are safe with a greater insertion depth with CO2.
Collapse
|
11
|
Barclay RL, Percy DB. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection without submucosal injection (UEMR) for large colorectal polyps: A community-based series. Am J Surg 2020; 220:693-696. [PMID: 32061399 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.01.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Revised: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection without submucosal injection (UEMR) is an appealing therapy for large colorectal polyps. However, this technique is not practiced widely and there are limited data evaluating UEMR in community settings. METHODS The study comprised patients undergoing UEMR of large (≥20 mm) sessile colorectal lesions at a community-based center. Residual neoplasia was assessed via follow-up colonoscopy. RESULTS Among 264 lesions (diameter 38 ± 18 mm; range 20-110 mm) 99% were successfully resected with UEMR. Two lesions involving the cecum/IC valve required multiple sessions. There were no cases of perforation or post-polypectomy syndrome. Delayed bleeding occurred in 1.6%, all managed conservatively. Residual neoplasia was present in 5.7% and was amenable to UEMR. CONCLUSION This large community-based series demonstrated high efficacy and safety of UEMR for large sessile colorectal lesions. The results support UEMR as first-line therapy for these lesions. SUMMARY Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection without submucosal injection (UEMR) is a recently developed method that has advantages over conventional EMR for treatment of large colorectal lesions. However, UEMR is not practiced widely and there are limited data evaluating this technique in everyday practice. This large community-based series demonstrated high efficacy and safety of UEMR for large sessile colorectal lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert L Barclay
- Vancouver General Hospital, 899 W.12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada; Pacific Digestive Health, 1590 Cedar Hill Cross Road, Suite 230, Victoria, BC, V8P 2P5, Canada.
| | - Dean B Percy
- Vancouver General Hospital, 899 W.12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zimmermann-Fraedrich K, Sehner S, Rex DK, Kaltenbach T, Soetikno R, Wallace M, Leung WK, Guo C, Gralnek IM, Brand EC, Groth S, Schachschal G, Ikematsu H, Siersema PD, Rösch T. Right-Sided Location Not Associated With Missed Colorectal Adenomas in an Individual-Level Reanalysis of Tandem Colonoscopy Studies. Gastroenterology 2019; 157:660-671.e2. [PMID: 31103625 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2018] [Revised: 05/07/2019] [Accepted: 05/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Interval cancers occur more frequently in the right colon. One reason could be that right-sided adenomas are frequently missed in colonoscopy examinations. We reanalyzed data from tandem colonoscopies to assess adenoma miss rates in relation to location and other factors. METHODS We pooled data from 8 randomized tandem trials comprising 2218 patients who had diagnostic or screening colonoscopies (adenomas detected in 49.8% of patients). We performed a mixed-effects logistic regression with patients as cluster effects with different independent parameters. Factors analyzed included location (left vs right, splenic flexure as cutoff), adenoma size, form, and histologic features. Analyses were controlled for potential confounding factors such as patient sex and age, colonoscopy indication, and bowel cleanliness. RESULTS Right-side location was not an independent risk factor for missed adenomas (odds ratio [OR] compared with the left side, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.75-1.17). However, compared with adenomas ≤5 mm, the OR for missing adenomas of 6-9 mm was 0.62 (95% CI, 0.44-0.87), and the OR for missing adenomas of ≥10 mm was 0.51 (95% CI, 0.33-0.77). Compared with pedunculated adenomas, sessile (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.16-2.85) and flat adenomas (OR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.49-4.10) were more likely to be missed. Histologic features were not significant risk factors for missed adenomas (OR for adenomas with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.34-1.37 and OR for sessile serrated adenomas, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.47-1.64 compared with low-grade adenomas). Men had a higher number of adenomas per colonoscopy (1.27; 95% CI, 1.21-1.33) than women (0.86; 95% CI, 0.80-0.93). Men were less likely to have missed adenomas than women (OR for missed adenomas in men, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57-0.94). CONCLUSIONS In an analysis of data from 8 randomized trials, we found that right-side location of an adenoma does not increase its odds for being missed during colonoscopy but that adenoma size and histologic features do increase risk. Further studies are needed to determine why adenomas are more frequently missed during colonoscopies in women than men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Susanne Sehner
- Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Tonya Kaltenbach
- Veterans Administration San Francisco and University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Roy Soetikno
- Veterans Administration San Francisco and University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Michael Wallace
- Division of and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Wai K Leung
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Chuanguo Guo
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Ian M Gralnek
- Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
| | - Eelco C Brand
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Groth
- Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Guido Schachschal
- Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hiroaki Ikematsu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Rösch
- Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cheng CL, Kuo YL, Hsieh YH, Tang JH, Leung FW. Water exchange colonoscopy decreased adenoma miss rates compared with literature data and local data with CO 2 insufflation: an observational study. BMC Gastroenterol 2019; 19:143. [PMID: 31412789 PMCID: PMC6694537 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-019-1065-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2019] [Accepted: 08/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Reports showed adenoma miss rates (AMRs) of 22.5–27% in the right colon and 23.4–33.3% in the proximal colon. Missed lesions could contribute to postcolonoscopy cancers. Water exchange (WE) with near-complete removal of infused water during insertion increased adenoma detection rate but the impact on AMR had not been reported. We hypothesized that WE could reduce AMRs. Study 1 compared the AMRs of WE with literature data. Study 2 developed local AMR data with CO2 insufflation. Methods The lead author attended a research seminar in 2017 on WE colonoscopy. For performance improvement, study 1 was undertaken. When data in study 1 confirmed WE produced a considerably lower AMRs in the right and proximal colon, study 2 with CO2 insufflation was performed. Results Eighty-six patients completed each study. In study 1, WE removed 89% of infused water upon arrival to the cecum. The AMRs of right colon (17.5%) and proximal colon (15.5%) were considerably lower than those in the literature. Upon completion of study 2, compared with local data of CO2 insufflation, WE showed a significantly lower AMR in the right (17.5% vs. 33.8%, P = 0.034) and proximal (15.5% vs. 30.4%, P = 0.018) colon, respectively. The major limitation was that the investigation consisted of two consecutive observational studies, not a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Conclusions WE with near-complete (89%) removal of infused water during insertion significantly decreased AMRs in the right and proximal colon compared with literature data and those of CO2 insufflation in our hands. The provocative data warrant confirmation in a RCT. Trial registration NCT03832322 (Retrospectively registered on February 2, 2019).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chi-Liang Cheng
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Evergreen General Hospital, 150 Huan-Zhong East Rd., Zhongli District, Taoyuan, 320, Taiwan.
| | - Yen-Lin Kuo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Evergreen General Hospital, 150 Huan-Zhong East Rd., Zhongli District, Taoyuan, 320, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Hsi Hsieh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, 2 Minsheng Rd., Dalin Township, Chiayi County, 622, Taiwan
| | - Jui-Hsiang Tang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, 252 Wuxing St, Xinyi District, Taipei, 100, Taiwan
| | - Felix W Leung
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Sepulveda Ambulatory Care Center, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System and David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 16111 Plummer St, North Hills, CA, 91413, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hsieh YH, Cadoni S, Ishaq S, Leung JW. Total underwater colonoscopy: still murky. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89:1071. [PMID: 31005129 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2018] [Accepted: 12/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Hsi Hsieh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Sergio Cadoni
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, CTO Hospital, Iglesias, Italy
| | - Sauid Ishaq
- Dudley Group of Hospitals, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Joseph W Leung
- Division of Gastroenterology, Sacramento Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Anderson JC, Kahi CJ, Rex DK. Response. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89:1071-1073. [PMID: 31005130 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2019] [Accepted: 01/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph C Anderson
- Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont, USA; The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Charles J Kahi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Leung FW, Jia H. Water infusion without near-complete removal during insertion by any other name is still water immersion. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89:599-601. [PMID: 30784500 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2018] [Accepted: 12/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Felix W Leung
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Sepulveda Ambulatory Care Center, VAGLAHS and David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, North Hills and Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Hui Jia
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Sepulveda Ambulatory Care Center, VAGLAHS and David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, North Hills and Los Angeles, California, USA; Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| |
Collapse
|