1
|
Fernandes C, Estevinho M, Marques Cruz M, Frazzoni L, Rodrigues PP, Fuccio L, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Adenoma detection rate by colonoscopy in real-world population-based studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2024. [PMID: 39227020 DOI: 10.1055/a-2382-5795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a quality indicator set at a minimum of 25% in unselected populations by the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). Nevertheless, a lack of pooled observational data resembling real-world practice limits support for this threshold. We aimed to perform a systematic review with meta-analysis to evaluate the pooled rates for conventional adenoma detection, polyp detection (PDR), cecal intubation, bowel preparation, and complications in population-based studies. METHODS The PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched until May 2023 for populational-based studies reporting overall ADR in unselected individuals. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS 31 studies were included, comprising 3 644 561 subjects. A high quality of procedures was noticeable, with a high cecal intubation rate and low complication rate. The overall pooled ADR, PDR, and rate of cancer detection were 26.5% (95%CI 23.3% to 29.7%), 38.3% (95%CI 32.5% to 44.1%), and 2.7% (95%CI 1.5% to 3.9%), respectively. ADR varied according to indication: screening 33.3% (95%CI 24.5% to 42.2%), surveillance 42.9% (95%CI 36.9% to 49.0%), and diagnostic 24.7% (95%CI 19.5% to 29.9%), with subgroup analysis revealing rates of 34.4% (95%CI 22.0% to 40.5%) for post-fecal occult blood test and 26.6% (95%CI 22.6% to 30.5%) for primary colonoscopy screening. Diminutive conventional adenomas yielded a pooled rate of 59.9% (95%CI 43.4% to 76.3%). The pooled rate for overall serrated lesion detection was 12.4% (95%CI 8.8% to 16.0%). Male sex and higher age were significantly associated with an ADR above the benchmark. CONCLUSION This first meta-analysis relying on real-world observational studies supports the ESGE benchmark for ADR, while suggesting that different benchmarks might be used according to indication, sex, and age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Fernandes
- Programme in Health Data Science, University of Porto Faculty of Medicine, Porto, Portugal
| | - Manuela Estevinho
- Department of Gastroenterology, Vila Nova de Gaia Espinho Hospital Center, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
- Department of Biomedicine, Unit of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Porto Faculty of Medicine, Porto, Portugal
| | - Manuel Marques Cruz
- MEDCIDS - Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, University of Porto Faculty of Medicine, Porto, Portugal
- CINTESIS@RISE, MEDCIDS, University of Porto Faculty of Medicine, Porto, Portugal
| | - Leonardo Frazzoni
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Forli-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Italy
| | | | - Lorenzo Fuccio
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Gastroenterology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, S. Orsola Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
- Gastroenterology Department and PreCAM, RISE@CI-IPO (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal
- Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC), Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hsiao BY, Chiang CJ, Yang YW, Lin LJ, Hsieh PC, Hsu TH, Lee WC. Insights Into Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Multidatabase Cohort Study of Over 1.5 Million Taiwanese. Am J Prev Med 2024; 67:339-349. [PMID: 38697323 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2023] [Revised: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a significant public health concern. This study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening on CRC incidence and mortality, leveraging the scale of over 1.5 million randomly selected Taiwanese and more than 11.7 million person-years of follow-up. METHODS This prospective cohort study merges data from 3 robust Taiwanese health databases: the CRC screening program, cancer registration, and death registration databases. Incidence and mortality rates of CRC were calculated based on age, sex, urbanization, and past screening status. Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the association between screening statuses and CRC incidence or mortality, adjusting for age, sex, and urbanization levels. Statistical analysis of the data was conducted in 2021-2022. RESULTS FIT screening was associated with a 33% reduction in CRC incidence and a 47% reduction in mortality. The study identified a dose-response relationship between the fecal hemoglobin concentration (f-HbC) levels and CRC risk. Participants with consistent FIT-negative results had significantly reduced CRC incidence and mortality risks, while those with one or more positive FIT results faced increased risks. Notably, compliance with follow-up examinations after a positive FIT significantly lowered mortality risk. CONCLUSIONS This large-scale study validates the efficacy of FIT screening in reducing CRC incidence and mortality. It offers a nuanced understanding of how various screening statuses impact CRC risks, thus providing valuable insights for public health strategies aimed at CRC prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo-Yu Hsiao
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Ju Chiang
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Taiwan Cancer Registry, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ya-Wen Yang
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Taiwan Cancer Registry, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Li-Ju Lin
- Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Pei-Chun Hsieh
- Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tsui-Hsia Hsu
- Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Chung Lee
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Taiwan Cancer Registry, Taipei, Taiwan; Institute of Health Data Analytics and Statistics, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zarandi-Nowroozi M, Taghiakbari M, Barkun A, Pohl H, Nauche B, Chagnon M, von Renteln D. Effect of fecal immunochemical test cut-off levels on adenoma detection rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2024; 59:882-892. [PMID: 38775234 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2024.2356649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is higher after a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) compared to direct screening colonoscopy. OBJECTIVE This meta-analysis evaluated how ADR, the rates of advanced adenoma detection (AADR), colorectal cancer detection (CDR), and sessile serrated lesion detection (SSLDR) are affected by different FIT positivity thresholds. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and EBM Reviews databases for studies reporting ADR, AADR, CDR, and SSLDR according to different FIT cut-off values in asymptomatic average-risk individuals aged 50-74 years old. Data were stratified according to sex, age, time to colonoscopy, publication year, continent, and FIT kit type. Study quality, heterogeneity, and publication bias were assessed. RESULTS Overall, 4280 articles were retrieved and fifty-eight studies were included (277,661 FIT-positive colonoscopies; mean cecal intubation 96.3%; mean age 60.8 years; male 52.1%). Mean ADR was 56.1% (95% CI 53.4 - 58.7%), while mean AADR, CDR, and SSLDR were 27.2% (95% CI 24.4 - 30.1%), 5.3% (95% CI 4.7 - 6.0%), and 3.0% (95% CI 1.7 - 4.6%), respectively. For each 20 μg Hb/g increase in FIT cut-off level, ADR increased by 1.54% (95% CI 0.52 - 2.56%, p < 0.01), AADR by 3.90% (95% CI 2.76 - 5.05%, p < 0.01) and CDR by 1.46% (95% CI 0.66 - 2.24%, p < 0.01). Many detection rates were greater amongst males and Europeans. CONCLUSIONS ADRs in FIT-positive colonoscopies are influenced by the adopted FIT positivity threshold, and identified targets, importantly, proved to be higher than most current societal recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Zarandi-Nowroozi
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Montreal Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mahsa Taghiakbari
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alan Barkun
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Heiko Pohl
- Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH, USA
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, VA White River Junction, White River Junction, VT, USA
| | - Bénédicte Nauche
- Department of Library, University of Montreal Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Miguel Chagnon
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Daniel von Renteln
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Montreal Hospital Center (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Barnell EK, Wurtzler EM, La Rocca J, Fitzgerald T, Petrone J, Hao Y, Kang Y, Holmes FL, Lieberman DA. Multitarget Stool RNA Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening. JAMA 2023; 330:1760-1768. [PMID: 37870871 PMCID: PMC10594178 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.22231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
Importance Noninvasive tests for colorectal cancer screening must include sensitive detection of colorectal cancer and precancerous lesions. These tests must be validated for the intended-use population, which includes average-risk individuals 45 years or older. Objective To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of a noninvasive, multitarget stool RNA (mt-sRNA) test (ColoSense) test compared with results from a colonoscopy. Design, Setting, and Participants This phase 3 clinical trial (CRC-PREVENT) was a blinded, prospective, cross-sectional study to support a premarket approval application for a class III medical device. A total of 8920 participants were identified online using social media platforms and enrolled from June 2021 to June 2022 using a decentralized nurse call center. All participants completed the mt-sRNA test, which incorporated a commercially available fecal immunochemical test (FIT), concentration of 8 RNA transcripts, and participant-reported smoking status. Stool samples were collected prior to participants completing a colonoscopy at their local endoscopy center. The mt-sRNA test results (positive or negative) were compared with index lesions observed on colonoscopy. Over the course of 12 months, individuals 45 years and older were enrolled in the clinical trial using the decentralized recruitment strategy. Participants were enrolled from 49 US states and obtained colonoscopies at more than 3800 different endoscopy centers. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes included the sensitivity of the mt-sRNA test for detecting colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas and the specificity for no lesions on colonoscopy. Results The mean (range) age of participants was 55 (45-90) years, with 4% self-identified as Asian, 11% as Black, and 7% as Hispanic. Of the 8920 eligible participants, 36 (0.40%) had colorectal cancer and 606 (6.8%) had advanced adenomas. The mt-sRNA test sensitivity for detecting colorectal cancer was 94%, sensitivity for detecting advanced adenomas was 46%, and specificity for no lesions on colonoscopy was 88%. The mt-sRNA test showed significant improvement in sensitivity for colorectal cancer (94% vs 78%; McNemar P = .01) and advanced adenomas (46% vs 29%; McNemar P < .001) compared with results of the FIT. Conclusions and Relevance In individuals 45 years and older, the mt-sRNA test showed high sensitivity for colorectal neoplasia (colorectal cancer and advanced adenoma) with significant improvement in sensitivity relative to the FIT. Specificity for no lesions on colonoscopy was comparable to existing molecular diagnostic tests. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04739722.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica K. Barnell
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
- McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
- Geneoscopy Inc, St Louis, Missouri
| | | | | | | | | | - Yansheng Hao
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | | | | | - David A. Lieberman
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hsu WF, Chiu HM. Optimization of colonoscopy quality: Comprehensive review of the literature and future perspectives. Dig Endosc 2023; 35:822-834. [PMID: 37381701 DOI: 10.1111/den.14627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
Colonoscopy is crucial in preventing colorectal cancer (CRC) and reducing associated mortality. This comprehensive review examines the importance of high-quality colonoscopy and associated quality indicators, including bowel preparation, cecal intubation rate, withdrawal time, adenoma detection rate (ADR), complete resection, specimen retrieval, complication rates, and patient satisfaction, while also discussing other ADR-related metrics. Additionally, the review draws attention to often overlooked quality aspects, such as nonpolypoid lesion detection, as well as insertion and withdrawal skills. Moreover, it explores the potential of artificial intelligence in enhancing colonoscopy quality and highlights specific considerations for organized screening programs. The review also emphasizes the implications of organized screening programs and the need for continuous quality improvement. A high-quality colonoscopy is crucial for preventing postcolonoscopy CRC- and CRC-related deaths. Health-care professionals must develop a thorough understanding of colonoscopy quality components, including technical quality, patient safety, and patient experience. By prioritizing ongoing evaluation and refinement of these quality indicators, health-care providers can contribute to improved patient outcomes and develop more effective CRC screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Feng Hsu
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Han-Mo Chiu
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ebner DW, Burger KN, Mahoney DW, Broderick BT, Eckmann JD, Devens ME, Lowrie KL, League JB, Bering J, Kahn A, Rodriguez EA, Prichard DO, Wallace MB, Kane SV, Leighton JA, Buttar NS, Rutten LJF, Gurudu SR, Kisiel JB. Neoplasia Diagnosis After Multi-target Stool DNA Is Enhanced Among Lowest Baseline Detectors. Dig Dis Sci 2023; 68:3721-3731. [PMID: 37486445 PMCID: PMC10882559 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-023-08038-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Variation in colorectal neoplasia detection limits the effectiveness of screening colonoscopy. By evaluating neoplasia detection rates of individual colonoscopists, we aimed to quantify the effects of pre-procedural knowledge of a positive (+) multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) on colonoscopy quality metrics. METHODS We retrospectively identified physicians who performed a high volume of + mt-sDNA colonoscopies; colorectal neoplasia at post-mt-sDNA colonoscopy was recorded. These colonoscopists were stratified into quartiles based on baseline adenoma detection rates. Baseline colonoscopy adenoma detection rates and sessile serrated lesion detection rates were compared to post-mt-sDNA colonoscopy neoplasia diagnosis rates among each quartile. Withdrawal times were measured from negative exams. RESULTS During the study period (2014-17) the highest quartile of physicians by volume of post-mt-sDNA colonoscopies were evaluated. Among thirty-five gastroenterologists, their median screening colonoscopy adenoma detection rate was 32% (IQR, 28-39%) and serrated lesion detection rate was 13% (8-15%). After + mt-sDNA, adenoma diagnosis increased to 47% (36-56%) and serrated lesion diagnosis increased to 31% (17-42%) (both p < 0.0001). Median withdrawal time increased from 10 (7-13) to 12 (10-17) minutes (p < 0.0001) and was proportionate across quartiles. After + mt-sDNA, lower baseline detectors had disproportionately higher rates of adenoma diagnosis in female versus male patients (p = 0.048) and higher serrated neoplasia diagnosis rates among all patients (p = 0.0092). CONCLUSIONS Knowledge of + mt-sDNA enriches neoplasia diagnosis compared to average risk screening exams. Adenomatous and serrated lesion diagnosis was magnified among those with lower adenoma detection rates. Awareness of the mt-sDNA result may increase physician attention during colonoscopy. Pre-procedure knowledge of a positive mt-sDNA test improves neoplasia diagnosis rates among colonoscopists with lower baseline adenoma detection rates, independent of withdrawal time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek W Ebner
- Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Kelli N Burger
- Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | | | | | - Jason D Eckmann
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Mary E Devens
- Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Kari L Lowrie
- Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - John B League
- Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | | | | | - Eduardo A Rodriguez
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | | | - Sunanda V Kane
- Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - John B Kisiel
- Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hsu WF, Su CW, Hsu CY, Yen AMF, Chen SLS, Chiu SYH, Lee YC, Hsu TH, Lin LJ, Chia SL, Wu MS, Chen HH, Chiu HM. Double-contrast barium enema is no longer justified as a backup examination for colonoscopy in the population screening program: Population study in an organized fecal immunochemical test-based screening program. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 38:1299-1306. [PMID: 37078599 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Revised: 02/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Currently, some countries still acknowledge double-contrast barium enema (DCBE) as a backup confirmatory examination when colonoscopy is not feasible or incomplete in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs. This study aims to compare the performance of colonoscopy and DCBE in terms of the risk of incident CRC after negative results in the fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based Taiwan Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. METHODS Subjects who had positive FITs and received confirmatory exams, either colonoscopy or DCBE, without the findings of neoplastic lesions from 2004 to 2013 in the screening program comprised the study cohort. Both the colonoscopy and DCBE subcohorts were followed until the end of 2018 and linked to the Taiwan Cancer Registry to identify incident CRC cases. Multivariate analysis was conducted to compare the risk of incident CRC in both subcohorts after controlling for potential confounders. RESULTS A total of 102 761 colonoscopies and 5885 DCBEs were performed after positive FITs without neoplastic findings during the study period. By the end of 2018, 2113 CRCs (2.7 per 1000 person-years) and 368 CRCs (7.6 per 1000 person-years) occurred in the colonoscopy and DCBE subcohorts, respectively. After adjusting for major confounders, DCBE had a significantly higher risk of incident CRC than colonoscopy, with an adjusted HR of 2.81 (95% CI = 2.51-3.14). CONCLUSIONS In the FIT screening program, using DCBE as a backup examination was associated with a nearly threefold risk of incident CRC compared with colonoscopy, demonstrating that it is no longer justified as a backup examination for incomplete colonoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Feng Hsu
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chiu-Wen Su
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Yang Hsu
- Graduate Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Amy Ming-Fang Yen
- School of Oral Hygiene, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Sam Li-Sheng Chen
- School of Oral Hygiene, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Sherry Yueh-Hsia Chiu
- Department of Health Care Management, College of Management, Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Chia Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tsui-Hsia Hsu
- Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Li-Ju Lin
- Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Li Chia
- Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Shiang Wu
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsiu-Hsi Chen
- Graduate Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Han-Mo Chiu
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Suzuki S, Aniwan S, Chiu HM, Laohavichitra K, Chirapongsathorn S, Yamamura T, Kuo CY, Yoshida N, Ang TL, Takezawa T, Rerknimitr R, Ishikawa H, Gotoda T. Linked-Color Imaging Detects More Colorectal Adenoma and Serrated Lesions: An International Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21:1493-1502.e4. [PMID: 36328306 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.10.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Revised: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Effects of linked-color imaging (LCI) on colorectal lesion detection and colonoscopy quality remain controversial. This study compared the detection rates of adenoma and other precursor lesions using LCI vs white-light imaging (WLI) during screening, diagnostic, and surveillance colonoscopies. METHODS This randomized controlled trial was performed at 11 institutions in 4 Asian countries/regions. Patients with abdominal symptoms, a primary screening colonoscopy, positive fecal immunochemical test results, or undergoing postpolypectomy surveillance were recruited and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the LCI or high-definition WLI group. The primary outcome was adenoma detection rate (ADR). Secondary outcomes were polyp detection rate, advanced ADR, sessile serrated lesion (SSL) detection rate, and the mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy. The recommended surveillance schedule distribution after trial colonoscopy was analyzed. RESULTS Between November 2020 and January 2022, there were 3050 participants (LCI, n = 1527; WLI, n = 1523) recruited. The LCI group ADR was significantly higher than the WLI group ADR using intention-to-treat (58.7% vs 46.7%; P < .01) and per-protocol analyses (59.6% vs 46.4%; P < .01). The LCI group polyp detection rates (68.6% vs 59.5%; P < .01), SSL detection rates (4.8% vs 2.8%; P < .01), and adenomas per colonoscopy (1.48 vs 1.02; P < .01) also were significantly higher. However, the advanced ADR was not significantly different (13.2% vs 11.0%; P = .06). Significantly more patients in the LCI group had shorter recommended surveillance schedules than the WLI group (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS Compared with WLI, LCI improved adenoma and other polyp detection rates, including SSLs, resulting in alteration of the recommended surveillance schedule after screening, diagnostic, and postpolypectomy surveillance colonoscopies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER UMIN000042432 (https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sho Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, International University of Health and Welfare, School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Satimai Aniwan
- Center of Excellence in Endoscopy for Gastrointestinal Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
| | - Han-Mo Chiu
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | - Sakkarin Chirapongsathorn
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital and College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Takeshi Yamamura
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Chen-Ya Kuo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Naohisa Yoshida
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Tiing Leong Ang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Changi General Hospital, SingHealth, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Takahito Takezawa
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Rungsun Rerknimitr
- Center of Excellence in Endoscopy for Gastrointestinal Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Hideki Ishikawa
- Department of Molecular-Targeting Cancer Prevention, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takuji Gotoda
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Xu H, Tang RSY, Lam TYT, Zhao G, Lau JYW, Liu Y, Wu Q, Rong L, Xu W, Li X, Wong SH, Cai S, Wang J, Liu G, Ma T, Liang X, Mak JWY, Xu H, Yuan P, Cao T, Li F, Ye Z, Shutian Z, Sung JJY. Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21:337-346.e3. [PMID: 35863686 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 56.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted colonoscopy improves polyp detection and characterization in colonoscopy. However, data from large-scale multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCT) in an asymptomatic population are lacking. METHODS This multicenter RCT aimed to compare AI-assisted colonoscopy with conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection in an asymptomatic population. Asymptomatic subjects 45-75 years of age undergoing colorectal cancer screening by direct colonoscopy or fecal immunochemical test were recruited in 6 referral centers in Hong Kong, Jilin, Inner Mongolia, Xiamen, and Beijing. In the AI-assisted colonoscopy, an AI polyp detection system (Eagle-Eye) with real-time notification on the same monitor of the endoscopy system was used. The primary outcome was overall adenoma detection rate (ADR). Secondary outcomes were mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy, ADR according to endoscopist's experience, and colonoscopy withdrawal time. This study received Institutional Review Board approval (CRE-2019.393). RESULTS From November 2019 to August 2021, 3059 subjects were randomized to AI-assisted colonoscopy (n = 1519) and conventional colonoscopy (n = 1540). Baseline characteristics and bowel preparation quality between the 2 groups were similar. The overall ADR (39.9% vs 32.4%; P < .001), advanced ADR (6.6% vs 4.9%; P = .041), ADR of expert (42.3% vs 32.8%; P < .001) and nonexpert endoscopists (37.5% vs 32.1%; P = .023), and adenomas per colonoscopy (0.59 ± 0.97 vs 0.45 ± 0.81; P < .001) were all significantly higher in the AI-assisted colonoscopy. The median withdrawal time (8.3 minutes vs 7.8 minutes; P = .004) was slightly longer in the AI-assisted colonoscopy group. CONCLUSIONS In this multicenter RCT in asymptomatic patients, AI-assisted colonoscopy improved overall ADR, advanced ADR, and ADR of both expert and nonexpert attending endoscopists. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT04422548).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China
| | - Raymond S Y Tang
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Thomas Y T Lam
- Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; Stanley Ho Big Data Decision Analytics Research Centre, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Guijun Zhao
- Department of Endoscopy Center, Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Endoscopic Digestive Diseases, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, China
| | - James Y W Lau
- Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; Department of Surgery, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Yunpeng Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Qi Wu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Endoscopy Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Long Rong
- Endoscopy Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Weiran Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China
| | - Xue Li
- Department of Endoscopy Center, Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Endoscopic Digestive Diseases, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, China
| | - Sunny H Wong
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Shuntian Cai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Jing Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Endoscopy Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Guanyi Liu
- Endoscopy Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tantan Ma
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China
| | - Xiong Liang
- Department of Endoscopy Center, Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Endoscopic Digestive Diseases, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, China
| | - Joyce W Y Mak
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Hongzhi Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Peng Yuan
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Endoscopy Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Tingting Cao
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China
| | - Fudong Li
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China
| | - Zhenshi Ye
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Zhang Shutian
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Joseph J Y Sung
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; Stanley Ho Big Data Decision Analytics Research Centre, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zimmermann-Fraedrich K, Sehner S, Rösch T, Aschenbeck J, Schröder A, Schubert S, Liceni T, Aminalai A, Spitz W, Möhler U, Heller F, Berndt R, Bartel-Kowalski C, Niemax K, Burmeister W, Schachschal G. Second-generation distal attachment cuff for adenoma detection in screening colonoscopy: a randomized multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97:112-120. [PMID: 36030888 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.08.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Randomized studies have demonstrated that a distal attachment cap with rubber side arms, the Endocuff Vision (ECV; Olympus America, Center Valley, Pa, USA), increased colonoscopic adenoma detection rate (ADR) in various mixed patient collectives. This is the first study to evaluate its use in a primary colonoscopic screening program. METHODS Patients over age 55 years undergoing screening colonoscopy in 9 German private offices in Berlin and Hamburg were randomized to either the study group using ECV or the control group using high-definition colonoscopies (standard of care). The main outcome parameter was ADR, whereas secondary outcomes were detection rates of all adenomas per colonoscopy (APCs), of adenoma subgroups, and of hyperplastic polyps. RESULTS Of 1416 patients (mean age, 61.1 years; 51.8% women), with a median of 41 examinations per examiner (n = 23; interquartile range, 12-81), 700 were examined with ECV and 716 without. Adjusting for the effects of the colonoscopies, ADR was 39.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32.6%-46.3%) in the ECV group versus 32.2% (95% CI, 25.9%-38.6%) in the control group, which resulted in an increase of 7.2% (95% CI, 2.3%-12.2%; P = .004). The increase in ADR was mainly because of small polyps, with adjusted ADRs for adenomas <10 mm of 33.3% (95% CI, 26.5%-40.2%) for study patients versus 24.0% (95% CI, 18.2%-29.8%) for control patients (P < .001). APC was also significantly increased (.57 ECV vs .51 control subjects, P = .045). CONCLUSIONS A distal attachment cap with side arms significantly increased the ADR in patients undergoing primary colonoscopic screening. Because of the correlation of ADR and interval cancer, its use should be encouraged, especially in this setting. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03442738.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Susanne Sehner
- Institute for Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Rösch
- Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Guido Schachschal
- Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rondonotti E, Di Paolo D, Rizzotto ER, Alvisi C, Buscarini E, Spadaccini M, Tamanini G, Paggi S, Amato A, Scardino G, Romeo S, Alicante S, Ancona F, Guido E, Marzo V, Chicco F, Agazzi S, Rosa C, Correale L, Repici A, Hassan C, Radaelli F. Efficacy of a computer-aided detection system in a fecal immunochemical test-based organized colorectal cancer screening program: a randomized controlled trial (AIFIT study). Endoscopy 2022; 54:1171-1179. [PMID: 35545122 DOI: 10.1055/a-1849-6878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Computer-aided detection (CADe) increases adenoma detection in primary screening colonoscopy. The potential benefit of CADe in a fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program is unknown. This study assessed whether use of CADe increases the adenoma detection rate (ADR) in a FIT-based CRC screening program. METHODS In a multicenter, randomized trial, FIT-positive individuals aged 50-74 years undergoing colonoscopy, were randomized (1:1) to receive high definition white-light (HDWL) colonoscopy, with or without a real-time deep-learning CADe by endoscopists with baseline ADR > 25 %. The primary outcome was ADR. Secondary outcomes were mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy (APC) and advanced adenoma detection rate (advanced-ADR). Subgroup analysis according to baseline endoscopists' ADR (≤ 40 %, 41 %-45 %, ≥ 46 %) was also performed. RESULTS 800 individuals (median age 61.0 years [interquartile range 55-67]; 409 men) were included: 405 underwent CADe-assisted colonoscopy and 395 underwent HDWL colonoscopy alone. ADR and APC were significantly higher in the CADe group than in the HDWL arm: ADR 53.6 % (95 %CI 48.6 %-58.5 %) vs. 45.3 % (95 %CI 40.3 %-50.45 %; RR 1.18; 95 %CI 1.03-1.36); APC 1.13 (SD 1.54) vs. 0.90 (SD 1.32; P = 0.03). No significant difference in advanced-ADR was found (18.5 % [95 %CI 14.8 %-22.6 %] vs. 15.9 % [95 %CI 12.5 %-19.9 %], respectively). An increase in ADR was observed in all endoscopist groups regardless of baseline ADR. CONCLUSIONS Incorporating CADe significantly increased ADR and APC in the framework of a FIT-based CRC screening program. The impact of CADe appeared to be consistent regardless of endoscopist baseline ADR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dhanai Di Paolo
- Gastroenterology Unit, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy.,Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Milan, Italy
| | - Erik Rosa Rizzotto
- Gastroenterology Unit, St. Antonio Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Padova, Italy
| | | | | | - Marco Spadaccini
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.,Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Silvia Paggi
- Gastroenterology Unit, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy
| | - Arnaldo Amato
- Gastroenterology Unit, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy
| | | | - Samanta Romeo
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera "Ospedale Maggiore", Crema, Italy
| | - Saverio Alicante
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera "Ospedale Maggiore", Crema, Italy
| | - Fabio Ancona
- Gastroenterology Unit, St. Antonio Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Padova, Italy
| | - Ennio Guido
- Gastroenterology Unit, St. Antonio Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Padova, Italy
| | | | - Fabio Chicco
- USD Endoscopia Digestiva, ASST Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Cesare Rosa
- USD Endoscopia Digestiva, ASST Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Loredana Correale
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.,Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.,Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sekiguchi M, Westerberg M, Ekbom A, Hultcrantz R, Forsberg A. Detection rates of colorectal neoplasia during colonoscopies and their associated factors in the SCREESCO study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 37:2120-2130. [PMID: 36062316 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Colonoscopy quality, including lesion detectability, is variable, and factors influencing lesion detection are not fully understood. This study investigated lesion detection rates during colonoscopies and the associated factors in the SCREEning of Swedish COlons (SCREESCO) study. METHODS In this cross-sectional analysis of data from SCREESCO, a large-scale randomized controlled trial of colorectal cancer screening in the Swedish population aged 60 years, we assessed data of first-time colonoscopies performed in both colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical test (FIT) arms. RESULTS This study included 16 552 individuals. The adenoma detection rate was 23.9% and 37.8% in colonoscopy and FIT arms, respectively. Regarding colonoscopy procedures, a withdrawal time ≥ 6 min was associated with higher detection rates of advanced adenomas (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.474, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.295-4.723), adenomas (2.181, 1.515-3.140), and proximal serrated lesions (pSLs) (1.713, 1.007-2.915). Antispasmodic use was associated with higher detection rates of these lesions and sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) (AOR, 95% CI: 1.523, 1.295-1.791; 1.361, 1.217-1.522; 1.450, 1.247-1.687; and 1.810, 1.512-2.167, respectively). Insertion time > 20 min was related to lower detection rates of adenomas, pSLs, and SSLs (AOR, 95% CI: 0.753, 0.639-0.887; 0.640, 0.495-0.828; and 0.704, 0.518-0.955, respectively). The relationship between a recent period and higher detection rates of pSLs and SSLs was also demonstrated. CONCLUSION Lesion detectability in SCREESCO was mostly acceptable with room for improvement. In addition to sufficient withdrawal time, antispasmodic use and acquiring skills enabling short insertion time may improve lesion detection. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02078804.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masau Sekiguchi
- Cancer Screening Center/Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.,Division of Screening Technology, National Cancer Center, Institute for Cancer Control, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Marcus Westerberg
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.,Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anders Ekbom
- Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Rolf Hultcrantz
- Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Forsberg
- Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sung JJY, Chiu HM, Lieberman D, Kuipers EJ, Rutter MD, Macrae F, Yeoh KG, Ang TL, Chong VH, John S, Li J, Wu K, Ng SSM, Makharia GK, Abdullah M, Kobayashi N, Sekiguchi M, Byeon JS, Kim HS, Parry S, Cabral-Prodigalidad PAI, Wu DC, Khomvilai S, Lui RN, Wong S, Lin YM, Dekker E. Third Asia-Pacific consensus recommendations on colorectal cancer screening and postpolypectomy surveillance. Gut 2022; 71:2152-2166. [PMID: 36002247 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
The Asia-Pacific region has the largest number of cases of colorectal cancer (CRC) and one of the highest levels of mortality due to this condition in the world. Since the publishing of two consensus recommendations in 2008 and 2015, significant advancements have been made in our knowledge of epidemiology, pathology and the natural history of the adenoma-carcinoma progression. Based on the most updated epidemiological and clinical studies in this region, considering literature from international studies, and adopting the modified Delphi process, the Asia-Pacific Working Group on Colorectal Cancer Screening has updated and revised their recommendations on (1) screening methods and preferred strategies; (2) age for starting and terminating screening for CRC; (3) screening for individuals with a family history of CRC or advanced adenoma; (4) surveillance for those with adenomas; (5) screening and surveillance for sessile serrated lesions and (6) quality assurance of screening programmes. Thirteen countries/regions in the Asia-Pacific region were represented in this exercise. International advisors from North America and Europe were invited to participate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Han-Mo Chiu
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | | | | | - Finlay Macrae
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | - Vui Heng Chong
- Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Hospital, Brunei, Brunei Darussalam
| | - Sneha John
- Digestive Health, Endoscopy, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jingnan Li
- Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Kaichun Wu
- Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Simon S M Ng
- The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | | | - Murdani Abdullah
- Division of Gastroenterology, Pancreatibiliar and Digestive Endoscopy. Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Dr Cipto Mangunkusumo, Jakarta, Indonesia.,Human Cancer Research Center. IMERI. Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Nozomu Kobayashi
- Cancer Screening Center/ Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.,Division of Screening Technology, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masau Sekiguchi
- Cancer Screening Center/ Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.,Division of Screening Technology, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jeong-Sik Byeon
- University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
| | - Hyun-Soo Kim
- Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
| | - Susan Parry
- National Bowel Screening Programme, New Zealand Ministry of Health, Auckland, New Zealand.,The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | | | | | - Rashid N Lui
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.,Institute of Digestive Disease, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Sunny Wong
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Singapore
| | - Yu-Min Lin
- Shin Kong Wu Ho Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - E Dekker
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fendrick AM, Lieberman D, Vahdat V, Chen JV, Ozbay AB, Limburg PJ. Cost-Effectiveness of Waiving Coinsurance for Follow-Up Colonoscopy after a Positive Stool-Based Colorectal Screening Test in a Medicare Population. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2022; 15:653-660. [PMID: 35768200 PMCID: PMC9530644 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-22-0153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Commercial insurance covers a follow-up colonoscopy after a positive colorectal cancer-screening test with no patient cost-sharing. Instituting a similar policy for Medicare beneficiaries may increase screening adherence and improve outcomes. The cost-effectiveness of stool-based colorectal cancer screening was compared across adherence scenarios that assumed Medicare coinsurance status quo (20% for follow-up colonoscopy) or waived coinsurance. The CRC-AIM model simulated previously unscreened eligible Medicare beneficiaries undergoing stool-based colorectal cancer screening at age 65 for 10 years. Medicare costs, colorectal cancer cases, colorectal cancer-related deaths, life-years gained (LYG), and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) were estimated versus no screening. Scenario 1 (S1) assumed 20% coinsurance for follow-up colonoscopy. Scenario 2 (S2) assumed waived coinsurance without adherence changes. Scenarios 3-7 (S3-S7) assumed that waiving coinsurance increased real-world stool-based screening and/or follow-up colonoscopy adherence by 5% or 10%. Sensitivity analyses assumed 1%-4% increased adherence. Cost-effectiveness threshold was ≤$100,000/QALY. Waiving coinsurance without adherence changes (S2) did not affect outcomes versus S1. S3-S7 versus S1 over 10 years estimated up to 3.6 fewer colorectal cancer cases/1,000 individuals, up to 2.1 fewer colorectal cancer deaths, up to 20.7 more LYG, and had comparable total costs per-patient (≤$6,478 vs. $6,449, respectively) as reduced colorectal cancer medical costs offset increased screening and colonoscopy costs. In sensitivity analyses, any increase in adherence after waiving coinsurance was cost-effective and increased LYG. In simulated Medicare beneficiaries, waiving coinsurance for follow-up colonoscopy after a positive stool-based test improved outcomes and was cost-effective when assumed to modestly increase colorectal cancer screening and/or follow-up colonoscopy adherence. PREVENTION RELEVANCE Follow-up colonoscopy after a positive stool-based test is necessary to complete the colorectal cancer-screening process. This analysis demonstrated that in a simulated Medicare population, waiving coinsurance for a follow-up colonoscopy improved estimated outcomes and was cost-effective when it was assumed that waiving the coinsurance modestly increased screening adherence. See related Spotlight, p. 641.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Mark Fendrick
- Division of General Medicine, Departments of Internal Medicine and Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Corresponding Author: A. Mark Fendrick, University of Michigan, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Rd, Building 16/4th floor, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. Phone: 734-647-9688; Fax: 734-936-8944;
| | - David Lieberman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | | | | | | | - Paul J. Limburg
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Denis B, Gendre I, Tuzin N, Murris J, Guignard A, Perrin P, Rahmi G. Adenoma detection rate is enough to assess endoscopist performance: a population-based observational study of FIT-positive colonoscopies. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E1208-E1217. [PMID: 36118642 PMCID: PMC9473817 DOI: 10.1055/a-1859-8277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Neoplasia-related indicators, such as adenoma detection rate (ADR), are a priority in the quality improvement process for colonoscopy. Our aim was to assess and compare different detection and characterization indicators in fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-positive colonoscopies, to determine associated factors, and to propose benchmarks. Patients and methods Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from all colonoscopies performed between 2015 and 2019 after a positive quantitative FIT in the population-based colorectal cancer screening program conducted in Alsace, part of the French national program. Detection indicators included ADR, mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy, and proximal serrated lesion (SL) detection rate. Characterization indicators included rate of non-neoplastic polyp (NNP) detection. Results Overall, 13,067 FIT-positive colonoscopies were evaluated, performed by 80 community gastroenterologists. The overall ADR was 57.6 %, and a 10 µg/g increase in fecal hemoglobin concentration was significantly associated with higher ADR (odds ratio [95 % confidence interval] = 1.02 [1.02-1.03]). Endoscopists whose ADR was ≥ 55 % were high detectors for all neoplasia, including proximal SLs and number of adenomas. The rate of detection of NNPs was 39.5 % in highest detectors (ADR > 70 %), significantly higher than in lower detectors (21.4 %) ( P < 0.001). There was a strong correlation between detection and characterization indicators, e. g. between rates of detection of proximal SLs and NNPs (Pearson = 0.73; P < 0.01). Conclusions A single indicator, ADR, is enough to assess endoscopist performance for both detection and characterization in routine practice provided the minimum target standard is raised and a maximum standard is added: 55 % and 70 % for FIT-positive colonoscopies, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernard Denis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Pasteur Hospital, Colmar, France,ADECA Alsace, Colmar, France
| | - Isabelle Gendre
- ADECA Alsace, Colmar, France,CRCDC Grand Est, Colmar, France
| | - Nicolas Tuzin
- Department of Public Health, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Juliette Murris
- Inserm, Centre de recherche des Cordeliers, Université de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France,HeKA, Inria, Paris, France
| | - Anne Guignard
- Department of Gastroenterology, Pasteur Hospital, Colmar, France
| | - Philippe Perrin
- ADECA Alsace, Colmar, France,CRCDC Grand Est, Colmar, France
| | - Gabriel Rahmi
- Paris University, PARCC, INSERM, Paris, France,Department of Gastroenterology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pooled rates of adenoma detection by colonoscopy in asymptomatic average-risk individuals with positive fecal immunochemical test: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96:208-222.e14. [PMID: 35413330 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Current adenoma detection rate (ADR) benchmarks for colonoscopy in individuals positive for a fecal immunochemical test (FIT) are ≥45% in men and ≥35% in women. These are based on weak, low-quality evidence. We performed a meta-analysis to ascertain the pooled ADR in FIT-positive colonoscopy. METHODS Major databases like PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched in October 2021 for studies reporting on ADR of colonoscopy in a FIT-positive population. Meta-analysis was performed by standard methodology using the random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by I2 and 95% prediction interval statistics. RESULTS Thirty-four high-quality studies that included more than 6 million asymptomatic average-risk individuals were analyzed; 2,655,345 individuals completed a screening FIT test. The pooled FIT screening rate was 69.8% (95% CI, 62.8-76.1), the pooled FIT positivity rate was 5.4% (95% CI, 4.3-6.9), and the colonoscopy completion rate was 85% (95% CI, 82.8-86.9). The pooled ADR was 47.8% (95% CI, 44.1-51.6), pooled advanced ADR was 25.3% (95% CI, 22-29), and the pooled colorectal cancer detection rate was 5.1% (95% CI, 4.4-5.9). The pooled ADR in men was 58.3% (95% CI, 52.8-63.6) and in women was 41.9% (95% CI, 36.4-47.6). The pooled ADR with qualitative FIT assessment was 67.7% (95% CI, 50.7-81), with 1-stool sample FIT was 52.8% (95% CI, 48.8-56.8), and at a cutoff threshold of 100 ng hemoglobin/mL was 52.1% (95% CI, 47-57.1). Based on time-period cumulative analysis, the ADR improved over time from 30.5% (95% CI, 24.6-37.2) to 47.8% (95% CI, 44.1-51.6). CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis supports the current ADR benchmarks for colonoscopy in FIT-positive individuals. Excellent pooled ADR parameters were demonstrated with qualitative assessment of 1 stool sample at a test cutoff value of 100 ng hemoglobin/mL, and ADR per endoscopist improved over time.
Collapse
|
17
|
Chang YY, Yen HH, Li PC, Chang RF, Yang CW, Chen YY, Chang WY. Upper endoscopy photodocumentation quality evaluation with novel deep learning system. Dig Endosc 2022; 34:994-1001. [PMID: 34716944 DOI: 10.1111/den.14179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2021] [Revised: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Visualization and photodocumentation during endoscopy procedures are suggested to be one indicator for endoscopy performance quality. However, this indicator is difficult to measure and audit manually in clinical practice. Artificial intelligence (AI) is an emerging technology that may solve this problem. METHODS A deep learning model with an accuracy of 96.64% was developed from 15,305 images for upper endoscopy anatomy classification in the unit. Endoscopy images for asymptomatic patients receiving screening endoscopy were evaluated with this model to assess the completeness of photodocumentation rate. RESULTS A total of 15,723 images from 472 upper endoscopies performed by 12 endoscopists were enrolled. The complete photodocumentation rate from the pharynx to the duodenum was 53.8% and from the esophagus to the duodenum was 78.0% in this study. Endoscopists with a higher adenoma detection rate had a higher complete examination rate from the pharynx to duodenum (60.0% vs. 38.7%, P < 0.0001) and from esophagus to duodenum (83.0% vs. 65.7%, P < 0.0001) compared with endoscopists with lower adenoma detection rate. The pharynx, gastric angle, gastric retroflex view, gastric antrum, and the first portion of duodenum are likely to be missed by endoscopists with lower adenoma detection rates. CONCLUSIONS We report the use of a deep learning model to audit endoscopy photodocumentation quality in our unit. Endoscopists with better performance in colonoscopy had a better performance for this quality indicator. The use of such an AI system may help the endoscopy unit audit endoscopy performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan-Yen Chang
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Electronics and Bioinformatics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsu-Heng Yen
- Artificial Intelligence Development Center, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.,Division of Gastroenterology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.,Department of Electrical Engineering, Chung Yuan University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Pai-Chi Li
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Electronics and Bioinformatics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ruey-Feng Chang
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Electronics and Bioinformatics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Artificial Intelligence Development Center, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Chia Wei Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Yang-Yuan Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Yen Chang
- Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lam TY, Wu PI, Tang RS, Tse Y, Lau JY, Wu JC, Sung JJ. Nurse-led reinforced education by mobile messenger improves the quality of bowel preparation of colonoscopy in a population-based colorectal cancer screening program: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud 2022; 133:104301. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
19
|
Zarandi-Nowroozi M, Djinbachian R, von Renteln D. Polypectomy for Diminutive and Small Colorectal Polyps. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2022; 32:241-257. [PMID: 35361334 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2021.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Diminutive and small colorectal polyps are common findings during colonoscopies, and rarely contain dysplastic elements and progress to colorectal cancer. With improving technology and the advent of artificial intelligence, detection rates of small or diminutive polyps and adenomas are rising, resulting in increasing costs associated with colonoscopy. Incomplete resection rates are an outcome of interest because it correlates with interval colorectal cancer. More effort is warranted to standardize training programs and sensitize endoscopists to the importance of personal performance as a quality metric of colonoscopy. This article reviews indications, methods, and recent developments in polypectomy for small and diminutive polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Zarandi-Nowroozi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital (CHUM) and Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), 900 Rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada
| | - Roupen Djinbachian
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital (CHUM) and Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), 900 Rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada
| | - Daniel von Renteln
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Montreal University Hospital (CHUM) and Montreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), 900 Rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC H2X 0A9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hsu WF, Chang CY, Chang CC, Chang LC, Chen CH, Lin CC, Lin YM, Lee CL, Wu HY, Lee HC, Lee YC, Su MY, Lin LJ, Chia SL, Wu MS, Chiu HM. Risk of colonoscopy-related complications in a fecal immunochemical test-based population colorectal cancer screening program. Endoscopy 2022; 54:290-298. [PMID: 33271603 DOI: 10.1055/a-1328-5126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The likelihood of advanced or synchronous neoplasms is significantly higher in fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-positive individuals than in the general population. The magnitude of the colonoscopy-related complication rate in FIT-positive individuals remains unknown. This study aimed to elucidate the colonoscopy-related complication rate after a positive FIT result and compare it with the rate when colonoscopy was performed for other purposes. METHODS Information regarding colonoscopy-related severe complications after a positive FIT result (FIT-colonoscopy) and ordinary colonoscopy during 2010-2014 was collected from the Taiwanese Colorectal Cancer Screening Program Database and National Health Insurance Research Database. Severe complications included significant bleeding, perforation, and cardiopulmonary events ≤ 14 days after colonoscopy. The number of events per 1000 procedures was used to quantify complication rates. Multivariate analysis was conducted to assess the association of various factors with severe complications associated with FIT-colonoscopy compared with ordinary colonoscopy. RESULTS 319 114 FIT-colonoscopies (214 955 patients) were identified, 51 242 (16.1 %) of which included biopsy and 94 172 (29.5 %) included polypectomy. Overall, 2125 significant bleedings (6.7 ‰) and 277 perforations (0.9 ‰) occurred ≤ 14 days after FIT-colonoscopy. Polypectomy, antiplatelet use, and anticoagulant use were associated with higher risk of complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.41, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 4.05-4.81); aOR 1.35, 95 %CI 1.12-1.53; aOR 1.88, 95 %CI 0.61-5.84, respectively). Compared with ordinary colonoscopy, FIT-colonoscopy involved significantly higher risk of significant bleeding (aOR 3.10, 95 %CI 2.90-3.32). CONCLUSIONS FIT-colonoscopy was associated with a more than two-fold risk of significant bleeding, especially when polypectomy was performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Feng Hsu
- Department of Medicine, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan.,College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Yang Chang
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Chao Chang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Li-Chun Chang
- College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Hua Chen
- Digestive Disease Center, Chang-Bing Show-Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Che Lin
- Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Min Lin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Long Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cathay General Hospital Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hong-Yuan Wu
- College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Chung Lee
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Department of Surgery, Hsinchu Cathay General Hospital, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Chia Lee
- College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Yao Su
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Li-Ju Lin
- Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Li Chia
- Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Shiang Wu
- College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Han-Mo Chiu
- College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hammami A, Elloumi H, Bouali R, Elloumi H. Clinical practice standards for colonoscopy. LA TUNISIE MEDICALE 2021; 99:952-960. [PMID: 35288895 PMCID: PMC8972176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Colonoscopy is considered as the most effective tool for preventing, screening, and diagnosing colorectal lesions. Effectiveness of colonoscopy was identified as a major priority, and it strictly depends on quality measures. Therefore, international guidelines were formulated on quality indicators for colonoscopy, aiming to reduce the rate of interval cancers related to missed lesions during colonoscopy. Quality indicators are divided into 3 time periods: preprocedure, intraprocedure, and postprocedure. The main pre-procedural indicators are the assessment of the appropriateness of indication of colonoscopy and the prescription of adequate bowel preparation during a consultation prior to colonoscopy. Per-procedural criteria include all technical aspects of the procedure, which are "endoscopist-dependent" factors, particularly cecal intubation, detection of adenomas and withdrawal time. The main post-procedure indicators are the rate of complications, patient experience and optimal surveillance intervals following removal of colorectal polyps. The implementation of key performance measures in endoscopy practice is increasingly important as it can help improving our care of patients and optimize outcomes. In this review, the "Club d'endoscopie digestive" (CED) presented a summary of the main colonoscopy quality indicators, and suggested recommendations that took into account the particularities of our local conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aya Hammami
- 1-Hôpital SahloulSousse / Université de Sousse, Faculté de médecine de Sousse
| | - Hanen Elloumi
- 2-Hôpital Habib Bougatfa Bizerte / Université Tunis El Manar, Faculté de Médecine de Tunis, Tunisie
| | - Riadh Bouali
- 3-Hôpital militaire / Université Tunis El Manar, Faculté de Médecine de Tunis, Tunisie
| | - Hela Elloumi
- 4-Hôpital Habib Thameur / Université Tunis El Manar, Faculté de Médecine de Tunis, Tunisie
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ladabaum U, Shepard J, Mannalithara A. Adenoma and Serrated Lesion Detection by Colonoscopy Indication: The ADR-ESS (ADR Extended to all Screening/Surveillance) Score. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19:1873-1882. [PMID: 33895358 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.04.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Revised: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The adenoma detection rate at screening (ADR) predicts interval colorectal cancer. Monitoring other lesion detection rates and colonoscopy indications has been proposed. We developed a comprehensive, automated colonoscopy audit program based on standardized clinical documentation, explored detection rates across indications, and developed the Adenoma Detection Rate - Extended to all Screening / Surveillance (ADR-ESS) score. METHODS In a prospective cohort study, we calculated overall and advanced adenoma and sessile serrated lesion (SSL) detection rates among 15,253 colonoscopies by 35 endoscopists from 4 endoscopy units across all colonoscopy indications. We explored correlations between detection rates, and the precision and stability of ADR-ESS versus ADR. RESULTS The overall "screening, first" ADR was 36.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.5%-38.1%). The adenoma detection rate was lower for "screening, not first" (relative rate [RR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.74-0.87) and "family history" (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74-0.96), and higher for "surveillance" (RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.15-1.31) and "follow-up, FIT" (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.07-1.37). For "screening, first," the detection rates for advanced adenoma, SSL, and advanced SSL were 6.7% (95% CI, 5.7%-7.7%), 7.2% (95% CI, 6.2%-8.2%), and 2.6% (95% CI, 2.0%-3.2%), respectively. Adenoma and SSL detection were correlated (r = 0.44; P = .008). ADR-ESS had substantially narrower confidence intervals and less period-to-period variability than ADR, and was not improved by weighting for indication volume and correction for detection by indication. CONCLUSIONS Comprehensive, automated colonoscopy audit based on standardized clinical documentation is feasible. Adenoma detection is a fair but imperfect proxy for SSL detection. ADR-ESS increases the precision of adenoma detection assessments and emphasizes quality across colonoscopy indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uri Ladabaum
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
| | - John Shepard
- Critical Care Quality and Strategic Initiatives, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California
| | - Ajitha Mannalithara
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Reducing adenoma miss rate of colonoscopy assisted by artificial intelligence: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Gastroenterol 2021; 56:746-757. [PMID: 34218329 DOI: 10.1007/s00535-021-01808-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We have developed the computer-aided detection (CADe) system using an original deep learning algorithm based on a convolutional neural network for assisting endoscopists in detecting colorectal lesions during colonoscopy. The aim of this study was to clarify whether adenoma miss rate (AMR) could be reduced with CADe assistance during screening and surveillance colonoscopy. METHODS This study was a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Patients aged 40 to 80 years who were referred for colorectal screening or surveillance at four sites in Japan were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to either the "standard colonoscopy (SC)-first group" or the "CADe-first group" to undergo a back-to-back tandem procedure. Tandem colonoscopies were performed on the same day for each participant by the same endoscopist in a preassigned order. All polyps detected in each pass were histopathologically diagnosed after biopsy or resection. RESULTS A total of 358 patients were enrolled and 179 patients were assigned to the SC-first group or CADe-first group. The AMR of the CADe-first group was significantly lower than that of the SC-first group (13.8% vs. 36.7%, P < 0.0001). Similar results were observed for the polyp miss rate (14.2% vs. 40.6%, P < 0.0001) and sessile serrated lesion miss rate (13.0% vs. 38.5%, P = 0.03). The adenoma detection rate of CADe-assisted colonoscopy was 64.5%, which was significantly higher than that of standard colonoscopy (53.6%; P = 0.036). CONCLUSION Our study results first showed a reduction in the AMR when assisting with CADe based on deep learning in a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Collapse
|
24
|
Ebner DW, Eckmann JD, Burger KN, Mahoney DW, Bering J, Kahn A, Rodriguez EA, Prichard DO, Wallace MB, Kane SV, Finney Rutten LJ, Gurudu SR, Kisiel JB. Detection of Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Neoplasia by Multi-target Stool DNA. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2021; 12:e00375. [PMID: 34140458 PMCID: PMC8216679 DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Significant variability between colonoscopy operators contributes to postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers (CRCs). We aimed to estimate postcolonoscopy colorectal neoplasia (CRN) detection by multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA), which has not previously been studied for this purpose. METHODS In a retrospective cohort of patients with +mt-sDNA and completed follow-up colonoscopy, positive predictive value (PPV) for endpoints of any CRN, advanced adenoma, right-sided neoplasia, sessile serrated polyps (SSP), and CRC were stratified by the time since previous colonoscopy (0-9, 10, and ≥11 years). mt-sDNA PPV at ≤9 years from previous average-risk screening colonoscopy was used to estimate CRN missed at previous screening colonoscopy. RESULTS Among the 850 studied patients with +mt-sDNA after a previous negative screening colonoscopy, any CRN was found in 535 (PPV 63%). Among 107 average-risk patients having +mt-sDNA ≤9 years after last negative colonoscopy, any CRN was found in 67 (PPV 63%), advanced neoplasia in 16 (PPV 15%), right-sided CRN in 48 (PPV 46%), and SSP in 20 (PPV 19%). These rates were similar to those in 47 additional average risk persons with previous incomplete colonoscopy and in an additional 68 persons at increased CRC risk. One CRC (stage I) was found in an average risk patient who was mt-sDNA positive 6 years after negative screening colonoscopy. DISCUSSION The high PPV of mt-sDNA 0-9 years after a negative screening colonoscopy suggests that lesions were likely missed on previous examination or may have arisen de novo. mt-sDNA as an interval test after negative screening colonoscopy warrants further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek W. Ebner
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jason D. Eckmann
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Kelli N. Burger
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Douglas W. Mahoney
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jamie Bering
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Allon Kahn
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Eduardo A. Rodriguez
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - David O. Prichard
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Health System, La Crosse, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Michael B. Wallace
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Sunanda V. Kane
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Suryakanth R. Gurudu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - John B. Kisiel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Fisher DA, Saoud L, Hassmiller Lich K, Fendrick AM, Ozbay AB, Borah BJ, Matney M, Parton M, Limburg PJ. Impact of screening and follow-up colonoscopy adenoma sensitivity on colorectal cancer screening outcomes in the CRC-AIM microsimulation model. Cancer Med 2021; 10:2855-2864. [PMID: 33314646 PMCID: PMC8026922 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Revised: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Real-world data for patients with positive colorectal cancer (CRC) screening stool-tests demonstrate that adenoma detection rates are lower when endoscopists are blinded to the stool-test results. This suggests adenoma sensitivity may be lower for screening colonoscopy than for follow-up to a known positive stool-based test. Previous CRC microsimulation models assume identical sensitivities between screening and follow-up colonoscopies after positive stool-tests. The Colorectal Cancer and Adenoma Incidence and Mortality Microsimulation Model (CRC-AIM) was used to explore the impact on screening outcomes when assuming different adenoma sensitivity between screening and combined follow-up/surveillance colonoscopies. METHODS Modeled screening strategies included colonoscopy every 10 years, triennial multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA), or annual fecal immunochemical test (FIT) from 50 to 75 years. Outcomes were reported per 1000 individuals without diagnosed CRC at age 40. Base-case adenoma sensitivity values were identical for screening and follow-up/surveillance colonoscopies. Ranges of adenoma sensitivity values for colonoscopy performance were developed using different slopes of odds ratio adjustments and were designated as small, medium, or large impact scenarios. RESULTS As the differences in adenoma sensitivity for screening versus follow-up/surveillance colonoscopies became greater, life-years gained (LYG) and reductions in CRC-related incidence and mortality versus no screening increased for mt-sDNA and FIT and decreased for screening colonoscopy. The LYG relative to screening colonoscopy reached >90% with FIT in the base-case scenario and with mt-sDNA in a "medium impact" scenario. CONCLUSIONS Assuming identical adenoma sensitivities for screening and follow-up/surveillance colonoscopies underestimate the potential benefits of stool-based screening strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah A. Fisher
- Department of MedicineDivision of GastroenterologyDuke UniversityDurhamNCUSA
| | | | - Kristen Hassmiller Lich
- Department of Health Policy & ManagementGillings School of Global Public HealthUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
| | - A. Mark Fendrick
- Division of GastroenterologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMIUSA
| | | | - Bijan J. Borah
- Department of Health Services ResearchMayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | | | | | - Paul J. Limburg
- Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Baile-Maxía S, Mangas-Sanjuan C, Medina-Prado L, Martínez-Sempere J, Murcia O, Ruíz-Gómez F, Casellas JA, Zapater P, Jover R. Diagnostic yield of early repeat colonoscopy after suboptimal bowel preparation in a fecal immunochemical test-based screening program. Endoscopy 2020; 52:1093-1100. [PMID: 32583393 DOI: 10.1055/a-1191-3011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current guidelines regarding surveillance after screening colonoscopy assume adequate bowel preparation. However, follow-up intervals after suboptimal cleansing are highly heterogeneous. We aimed to determine the diagnostic yield of early repeat colonoscopy in patients with suboptimal bowel preparation in fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening colonoscopy. METHODS An observational study including patients who underwent colonoscopy with suboptimal bowel preparation after positive FIT screening and then repeat colonoscopy within 1 year. Suboptimal preparation was defined as a Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score of 1 in any segment. Patients with a BBPS score of 0 in any segment or incomplete examination were excluded. The adenoma detection rate (ADR), advanced ADR (AADR), and colorectal cancer rate were calculated for the index and repeat colonoscopies. RESULTS Of the 2474 patients with FIT-positive colonoscopy at our center during this period, 314 (12.7 %) had suboptimal preparation. Of the 259 (82.5 %) patients who underwent repeat colonoscopy, suboptimal cleansing persisted in 22 (9 %). On repeat colonoscopy, the ADR was 38.7 % (95 %CI 32.6 % to 44.8 %) and the AADR was 14.9 % (95 %CI 10.5 % to 19.4 %). The per-adenoma miss rate was 27.7 % (95 %CI 24.0 % to 31.6 %), and the per-advanced adenoma miss rate was 17.6 % (95 %CI 13.3 % to 22.7 %). After repeat colonoscopy, the post-polypectomy surveillance recommendation changed from 10 to 3 years in 14.7 % of the patients with previous 10-year surveillance recommendation. CONCLUSIONS Patients with suboptimal bowel preparation on FIT-positive colonoscopy present a high rate of advanced adenomas in repeat colonoscopy, with major changes in post-polypectomy surveillance recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Baile-Maxía
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain
| | - Carolina Mangas-Sanjuan
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain
| | - Lucía Medina-Prado
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain
| | - Juan Martínez-Sempere
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain
| | - Oscar Murcia
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain
| | - Francisco Ruíz-Gómez
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain
| | - Juan A Casellas
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain
| | - Pedro Zapater
- Clinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica ISABIAL, CIBERehd, Alicante, Spain
| | - Rodrigo Jover
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hsu WF, Cheng SY, Shun CT, Chang LC, Tu CH, Wang HP, Wu MS, Chiu HM. Higher risk of advanced histology in adenoma less than 10 mm in fecal immunochemical test screening: Implication for management. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 35:1738-1745. [PMID: 32187748 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2019] [Revised: 03/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Whether diminutive or small adenomas detected by fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) are associated with a higher risk of advanced histology remains unknown. We investigated the prevalence of advanced histology in diminutive and small adenomas detected by FIT and compared with that detected by colonoscopy screening. METHODS We prospectively compared 1860 FIT-positive patients (FIT-positive cohort) and 6691 average-risk patients (screening colonoscopy cohort). Both groups underwent colonoscopies and were shown to have neoplastic lesions. The prevalence of advanced histology was determined, as was the associations with size and FIT positivity. RESULTS We analyzed 3920 neoplastic lesions from the FIT-positive cohort and 9789 neoplastic lesions from the screening colonoscopy cohort. Eighty (4.3%) diminutive lesions in FIT-positive cohort had advanced histology but without any invasive cancer. Twenty-one patients in the FIT-positive cohort and 49 in the screening colonoscopy cohort with diminutive adenomas displayed advanced histology (3.5% vs 1.2%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.99, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.77-5.06). Sixteen patients in the FIT-positive cohort (2.7%) with diminutive adenomas might have changed the surveillance interval if a resect-and-discard strategy was applied, with a higher likelihood compared with the screening colonoscopy cohort (aOR = 2.76, 95% CI: 1.53-4.99). CONCLUSIONS Fecal immunochemical test screening detected more diminutive and small adenomas with advanced histology compared with colonoscopy screening. Its impact on current management of diminutive polyp is limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Feng Hsu
- Department of Medicine, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shao-Yi Cheng
- Department of Family Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Tung Shun
- Department of Pathology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Li-Chun Chang
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Hung Tu
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsiu-Po Wang
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Shiang Wu
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Han-Mo Chiu
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
González-Suárez B, Pagés M, Araujo IK, Romero C, Rodríguez de Miguel C, Ayuso JR, Pozo À, Vila-Casadesús M, Serradesanferm A, Ginès À, Fernández-Esparrach G, Pellisé M, López-Cerón M, Flores D, Córdova H, Sendino O, Grau J, Llach J, Serra-Burriel M, Cárdenas A, Balaguer F, Castells A. Colon capsule endoscopy versus CT colonography in FIT-positive colorectal cancer screening subjects: a prospective randomised trial-the VICOCA study. BMC Med 2020; 18:255. [PMID: 32943059 PMCID: PMC7500543 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01717-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) and CT colonography (CTC) are minimally invasive techniques for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Our objective is to compare CCE and CTC for the identification of patients with colorectal neoplasia among participants in a CRC screening programme with positive faecal immunochemical test (FIT). Primary outcome was to compare the performance of CCE and CTC in detecting patients with neoplastic lesions. METHODS The VICOCA study is a prospective, single-centre, randomised trial conducted from March 2014 to May 2016; 662 individuals were invited and 349 were randomised to CCE or CTC before colonoscopy. Endoscopists were blinded to the results of CCE and CTC. RESULTS Three hundred forty-nine individuals were included: 173 in the CCE group and 176 in the CTC group. Two hundred ninety individuals agreed to participate: 147 in the CCE group and 143 in the CTC group. In the intention-to-screen analysis, sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values for the identification of individuals with colorectal neoplasia were 98.1%, 76.6%, 93.7% and 92.0% in the CCE group and 64.9%, 95.7%, 96.8% and 57.7% in the CTC group. In terms of detecting significant neoplastic lesions, the sensitivity of CCE and CTC was 96.1% and 79.3%, respectively. Detection rate for advanced colorectal neoplasm was higher in the CCE group than in the CTC group (100% and 93.1%, respectively; RR = 1.07; p = 0.08). Both CCE and CTC identified all patients with cancer. CCE detected more patients with any lesion than CTC (98.6% and 81.0%, respectively; RR = 1.22; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION Although both techniques seem to be similar in detecting patients with advanced colorectal neoplasms, CCE is more sensitive for the detection of any neoplastic lesion. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02081742 . Registered: September 16, 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Begoña González-Suárez
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. .,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain.
| | - Mario Pagés
- Radiology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Isis Karina Araujo
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristina Romero
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Juan Ramón Ayuso
- Radiology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Àngels Pozo
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Vila-Casadesús
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain
| | - Anna Serradesanferm
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Àngels Ginès
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain.,Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Glòria Fernández-Esparrach
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain.,Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Maria Pellisé
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain.,Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - María López-Cerón
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Flores
- Radiology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Henry Córdova
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain
| | - Oriol Sendino
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jaume Grau
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep Llach
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain.,Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Miquel Serra-Burriel
- Center for Research in Health and Economic, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrés Cárdenas
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Francesc Balaguer
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain.,Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Antoni Castells
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain.,Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tseng CW, Koo M, Hsieh YH. Cecal intubation time between the use of one-channel and two-channel water exchange colonoscopy: A randomized controlled trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 35:1562-1569. [PMID: 32203986 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Water exchange (WE) colonoscopy is the least painful insertion technique with high adenoma detection rate but requires a longer intubation time. In the published literature, some investigators used the instrument channel for both infusing and suctioning of water (one channel), while others use colonoscopes with an integrated water-jet channel specifically designed for infusing water (two channel). The aim of this study was to compare cecal intubation time between one-channel and two-channel WE. METHODS A total 120 patients undergoing colonoscopy from May 2017 to April 2019 at a regional hospital in southern Taiwan were randomized to either a two-channel group (n = 60) or a one-channel group (n = 60). The primary outcome was cecal intubation time. RESULTS The mean cecal intubation time was significantly shorter in the two-channel group compared with the one-channel group (14.0 ± 4.0 vs 17.4 ± 6.7 min, P < 0.001). The two-channel group required less water infused during insertion (564.8 ± 232.4 vs 1213.3 ± 467.5 mL, P < 0.001) but achieved a significantly higher Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score (8.4 ± 0.8 vs 7.5 ± 1.1, P < 0.001) than did the one-channel group. The adenoma detection rate was comparable in the two groups (50.0% vs 48.3%, P = 0.855). CONCLUSIONS In comparison with the one-channel WE, two-channel WE showed a shorter cecal intubation time, required less amount of water during insertion, and provided a better salvage cleansing effect. (NCT03279705).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Wei Tseng
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien City, Taiwan
| | - Malcolm Koo
- Graduate Institute of Long-term Care, Tzu Chi University of Science and Technology, Hualien City, Hualien, Taiwan.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yu-Hsi Hsieh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien City, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Núñez Rodríguez MH, Díez Redondo P, Riu Pons F, Cimavilla M, Hernández L, Loza A, Pérez-Miranda M. Proximal retroflexion versus second forward view of the right colon during screening colonoscopy: A multicentre randomized controlled trial. United European Gastroenterol J 2020; 8:725-735. [PMID: 32379535 DOI: 10.1177/2050640620924210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colonoscopy is the gold standard investigation for the detection of colorectal cancer, but the right colon is more difficult to examine than the left colon. A second examination of the proximal colon has the potential to reduce rates of missed pathology. OBJECTIVE To determine whether proximal retroflexion improves the adenoma detection rate or other outcomes in the right colon compared with the forward view. METHODS We performed a multicentre randomized controlled trial of patients from the colorectal cancer screening programme with a positive faecal immunochemical test. Patients were randomized to a second right colon examination using proximal retroflexion or forward view. RESULTS A total of 692 patients were included. A second examination of the right colon, with an average additional procedure time of 1.62 min, increased the adenoma detection rate by 11%, regardless of the method used (9% proximal retroflexion vs. 12% second forward view, p = 0.21). The adenoma miss rate was 19% (17% proximal retroflexion vs. 20% forward view, p = 0.28) The success rate of retroflexion was 83%, without secondary complications. In the 15.6% of patients in whom lesions were detected during the second pass, endoscopic follow-up was modified by reducing the time of the next colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS A second examination of the right colon, either from retroflexion or second forward view, can increase adenoma detection rate and shorten surveillance intervals in patients undergoing screening colonoscopy. This should be emphasized during colonoscopy training and integrated into diagnostic colonoscopy practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Fausto Riu Pons
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.,IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Cimavilla
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Luis Hernández
- Gastroenterlogy Department, Hospital Santos Reyes, Aranda de Duero, Spain
| | - Andrea Loza
- Gastroenterlogy Department, Hospital Santos Reyes, Aranda de Duero, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Mangas-Sanjuan C, Santana E, Cubiella J, Rodríguez-Camacho E, Seoane A, Alvarez-Gonzalez MA, Suárez A, Álvarez-García V, González N, Luè A, Cid-Gomez L, Ponce M, Bujanda L, Portillo I, Pellisé M, Díez-Redondo P, Herráiz M, Ono A, Pizarro Á, Zapater P, Jover R. Variation in Colonoscopy Performance Measures According to Procedure Indication. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18:1216-1223.e2. [PMID: 31446179 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2019] [Accepted: 08/02/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Most fulfillment and benchmarking information for colonoscopy quality indicators has been obtained from studies of primary screening colonoscopies. We analyzed differences in the fulfillment of colonoscopy quality indicators based on the indication for endoscopy. METHODS We performed an observational, multicenter, cross-sectional study of 14,867 patients who underwent endoscopy procedures for gastrointestinal symptoms (40.3%), a positive result from a fecal immunochemical test (36.0%), postpolypectomy surveillance (15.3%), or primary screening (8.4%), from February 2016 through December 2017 at 14 centers in Spain. We evaluated rates of adequate colon cleansing, cecal intubation, adenoma detection, and colorectal cancer detection, among others. We used findings from primary screening colonoscopies as the reference standard. RESULTS Fewer than 90% of patients had adequate bowel preparation; 83.1% of patients with gastrointestinal symptoms had adequate bowel preparation (odds ratio [OR] compared with patients with primary screening colonoscopies, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.49-0.78) and 85.3% of patients receiving postpolypectomy surveillance had adequate bowel preparation (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55-0.91). The cecal intubation rate was also lower in patients with gastrointestinal symptoms (93.1%) (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.22-0.52). The adenoma detection rate was higher in patients with a positive result from a fecal immunochemical test (46.4%) (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.71-2.35) and in patients undergoing postpolypectomy surveillance (48.2%) (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.20-1.67). The highest proportion of patients with colorectal cancer was in the gastrointestinal symptom group (5.1%) (OR, 5.24; 95% CI, 2.30-11.93) and the lowest was in patients undergoing surveillance (0.8%) (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.32-2.14). CONCLUSIONS Fulfillment of colonoscopy performance measures varies substantially by indication. Policies addressing performance measures beyond colonoscopy screening procedures should be developed. Benchmarking recommendations could be adjusted according to colonoscopy indication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina Mangas-Sanjuan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria and Biomédica de Alicante, ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain
| | - Enrique Santana
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria and Biomédica de Alicante, ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain
| | - Joaquín Cubiella
- Department of Gastroenterology, Complexo Hospitalario de Ourense, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Ourense, Pontevedra y Vigo, Ourense, Spain
| | | | - Agustín Seoane
- Department of Gastroenterology, Parc de Salut Mar, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Adolfo Suárez
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | | | - Natalia González
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Instituto Universitario de Tecnologías Biomédicas and Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Canarias, Universidad de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Alberto Luè
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Aragon Health Research Institute, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Lucía Cid-Gomez
- Department of Gastroenterology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica, Xerencia de Xestión Integrada de Vigo, Vigo, Spain
| | - Marta Ponce
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Luis Bujanda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Biodonostia Medical Research Institute, San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Isabel Portillo
- BioCruces Health Research Institute, Colorectal Screening Program, Basque Health Service, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - María Pellisé
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Maite Herráiz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Clínica Universitaria and Medical School, University of Navarra, Navarra, Spain
| | - Akiko Ono
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria, Murcia, Spain
| | - Ángeles Pizarro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Pedro Zapater
- Unit of Clinical Pharmacology, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL) Alicante, Spain
| | - Rodrigo Jover
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria and Biomédica de Alicante, ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain.
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Water Exchange (WE) and Quality Improvement-Enhanced Advanced Adenoma Detection: A Pooled Data Analysis of 6 Randomized Controlled Trials. J Clin Gastroenterol 2020; 54:212-217. [PMID: 31904682 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Advanced adenomas (≥10 mm in diameter, >25% villous, or high-grade dysplasia), a marker of colorectal cancer risk, are used to stratify patients for closer surveillance. Modern accessories, endoscopes, and age-adjusted evaluation have variable impacts on the advanced adenoma detection rate (AADR). In 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing air insufflation (AI) with water exchange (WE), the right colon AADR was significantly increased by WE. Four network meta-analyses reported that WE significantly increased overall adenoma detection rate (ADR), but the impact on AADR was not addressed. AIM The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that WE significantly increased AADR compared with AI. METHOD Six Clinicaltrial.gov-registered RCTs were reported by a group of WE investigators. Data including AADR (primary outcome) and overall ADR (secondary outcome) were pooled. RESULTS A total of 5407 patients were randomized to AI (2699) and WE (2708). Compared with AI, WE significantly increased AADR (5.7% vs. 8.3%, P=0.001) and overall ADR (20.9% vs. 27.4%, P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS In contrast to published reports, which showed variable impacts on AADR, WE was consistent in increasing AADR in 6 reported RCTs. The pooled data confirm that the impact of WE in increasing AADR was significant. The significantly enhanced overall ADR indicated that WE provided a higher quality outcome than AI. The significant improvement in AADR confirmed WE to be clinically relevant and has finally arrived as a timely addition to colorectal cancer prevention programs.
Collapse
|
33
|
Detection Measures for Colonoscopy: Considerations On the Adenoma Detection Rate, Recommended Detection Thresholds, Withdrawal Times, and Potential Updates to Measures. J Clin Gastroenterol 2020; 54:130-135. [PMID: 31851104 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The adenoma detection rate (ADR) was first proposed by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer in 2002 and, subsequently, has been validated as a strong predictor of colorectal cancer risk after colonoscopy. ADR is now widely considered the most important quality measure in colonoscopy. ADR is a surrogate for missed lesions and for cancer incidence after colonoscopy. ADR has weaknesses, and multiple other detection targets have been evaluated as alternatives. This review discusses the history of ADR, the strength and weaknesses of ADR, and proposed alternatives to ADR. Of the alternatives, adenomas per colonoscopy has the most advantages with limited disadvantages relative to ADR and has some potential to eventually replace ADR.
Collapse
|
34
|
Hsieh YH, Tseng CW, Koo M, Leung FW. Feasibility of sedation on demand in Taiwan using water exchange and air insufflation: A randomized controlled trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 35:256-262. [PMID: 31420895 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.14839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2019] [Revised: 08/08/2019] [Accepted: 08/12/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Completion of colonoscopy without sedation eliminates sedation cost and complications. Reported in the United States and Europe, on-demand sedation is not routine practice in Taiwan. Water exchange (WE), characterized by infusion and nearly complete removal of infused water during insertion, reduces insertion pain compared to air insufflation (AI) during colonoscopy. We evaluated the feasibility of on-demand sedation in Taiwan. In a randomized controlled trial of WE vs AI colonoscopy, we also aimed to determine if WE augmented the implementation by reducing insertion pain and decreasing sedation requirement. METHODS This prospective patient-blinded study randomized patients to AI or WE (75 patients/group) to aid insertion. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients completing without sedation. RESULTS In the AI and WE groups, 76.0% and 93.3% (P = 0.006) completed without need for sedation, respectively. The WE group had lower insertion pain score (mean [SD]) (4.0 [2.9] vs 2.1 [2.6], P < 0.001), lower doses of propofol (25.7 [52.7] mg vs 9.1 [35.6] mg, P = 0.012), and less time in the recovery room (3.4 [7.4] vs 1.5 [5.5], P = 0.027) than the AI group. Patient satisfaction scores and willingness to repeat if needed in the future were similar. CONCLUSION On-demand sedation was feasible in Taiwan. The completion rate without sedation was high in patients (76.0% with standard AI) open to the option (no prior intent to receive the standard of full or minimal sedation). WE augmented the implementation by reducing insertion pain and decreasing sedation requirement without adversely affecting patient satisfaction or willingness to repeat.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Hsi Hsieh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Wei Tseng
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Malcolm Koo
- Graduate Institute of Long-term Care, Tzu Chi University of Science and Technology, Hualien, Taiwan.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Felix W Leung
- Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda Ambulatory Care Center, North Hill, California, USA.,David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Braillon A. Patient Characteristics and Adenoma Detection Rates. JAMA Surg 2019; 154:1170-1171. [PMID: 31483453 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.3375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
|
36
|
Braillon A. Improving Adenoma Detection Rates … Without a Benchmark! Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17:2137. [PMID: 30928449 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.03.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2019] [Revised: 03/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/21/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|