|
1
|
Qi ZP, Xu EP, He DL, Wang Y, Chen BS, Dong XS, Shi Q, Cai SL, Guo Q, Li N, Li X, Huang HY, Li B, Sun D, Xu JG, Chen ZH, Yalikong A, Liu JY, Lv ZT, Xu JM, Zhou PH, Zhong YS. Efficacy of image-enhanced endoscopy for colorectal adenoma detection: A multicenter, randomized trial. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2023; 15:878-891. [PMID: 37275449 PMCID: PMC10237030 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i5.878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improved adenoma detection at colonoscopy has decreased the risk of developing colorectal cancer. However, whether image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE) further improves the adenoma detection rate (ADR) is controversial.
AIM To compare IEE with white-light imaging (WLI) endoscopy for the detection and identification of colorectal adenoma.
METHODS This was a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Participants were enrolled between September 2019 to April 2021 from 4 hospital in China. Patients were randomly assigned to an IEE group with WLI on entry and IEE on withdrawal (n = 2113) or a WLI group with WLI on both entry and withdrawal (n = 2098). The primary outcome was the ADR. The secondary endpoints were the polyp detection rate (PDR), adenomas per colonoscopy, adenomas per positive colonoscopy, and factors related to adenoma detection.
RESULTS A total of 4211 patients (966 adenomas) were included in the analysis (mean age, 56.7 years, 47.1% male). There were 2113 patients (508 adenomas) in the IEE group and 2098 patients (458 adenomas) in the WLI group. The ADR in two group were not significantly different [24.0% vs 21.8%, 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99-1.23, P = 0.09]. The PDR was higher with IEE group (41.7%) than with WLI group (36.1%, 1.16, 95%CI: 1.07-1.25, P = 0.01). Differences in mean withdrawal time (7.90 ± 3.42 min vs 7.85 ± 3.47 min, P = 0.30) and adenomas per colonoscopy (0.33 ± 0.68 vs 0.28 ± 0.62, P = 0.06) were not significant. Subgroup analysis found that with narrow-band imaging (NBI), between-group differences in the ADR, were not significant (23.7% vs 21.8%, 1.09, 95%CI: 0.97-1.22, P = 0.15), but were greater with linked color imaging (30.9% vs 21.8%, 1.42, 95%CI: 1.04-1.93, P = 0.04). the second-generation NBI (2G-NBI) had an advantage of ADR than both WLI and the first-generation NBI (27.0% vs 21.8%, P = 0.01; 27.0% vs 21.2.0%, P = 0.01).
CONCLUSION This prospective study confirmed that, among Chinese, IEE didn’t increase the ADR compared with WLI, but 2G-NBI increase the ADR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi-Peng Qi
- Endoscopy Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China
| | - En-Pan Xu
- Endoscopy Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China
| | - Dong-Li He
- Endoscopy Center, Shanghai Xuhui Central Hospital, Shanghai 200030, China
| | - Yan Wang
- Endoscopy Center, Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, Rongcheng 264300, Shandong Province, China
| | - Bai-Sheng Chen
- Department of Endoscopy Center, Xiamen Branch of Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Xiamen 361000, Fujian Province, China
| | - Xue-Si Dong
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100000, China
| | - Qiang Shi
- Endoscopy Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China
| | - Shi-Lun Cai
- Endoscopy Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China
| | - Qi Guo
- Endoscopy Center, Shanghai Xuhui Central Hospital, Shanghai 200030, China
| | - Ni Li
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100000, China
| | - Xing Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Pingxiang People’s Hospital, Pingxiang 337000, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Hai-Yan Huang
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Xiaogang Hospital, Ningbo 315000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Bing Li
- Endoscopy Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China
| | - Di Sun
- Endoscopy Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China
| | - Jian-Guang Xu
- Endoscopy Center, Quzhou People’s Hospital, Quzhou 324000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Zhang-Han Chen
- Endoscopy Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China
| | - Ayimukedisi Yalikong
- Endoscopy Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China
| | - Jin-Yi Liu
- Endoscopy Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China
| | - Zhen-Tao Lv
- Endoscopy Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China
| | - Jian-Min Xu
- Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China
| | - Ping-Hong Zhou
- Endoscopy Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China
| | - Yun-Shi Zhong
- Endoscopy Center, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China
| |
Collapse
|