Will magnet-assisted capsule endoscopy become a viable screening tool for Barrett's esophagus and esophageal varices?

A new artificial intelligence system for both stomach and small-bowel capsule endoscopy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Despite the benefits of artificial intelligence in small-bowel (SB) capsule endoscopy (CE) image reading, information on its application in the stomach and SB CE is lacking.

METHODS

In this multicenter, retrospective diagnostic study, gastric imaging data were added to the deep learning-based SmartScan (SS), which has been described previously. A total of 1069 magnetically controlled GI CE examinations (comprising 2,672,542 gastric images) were used in the training phase for recognizing gastric pathologies, producing a new artificial intelligence algorithm named SS Plus. A total of 342 fully automated, magnetically controlled CE examinations were included in the validation phase. The performance of both senior and junior endoscopists with both the SS Plus-assisted reading (SSP-AR) and conventional reading (CR) modes was assessed.

RESULTS

SS Plus was designed to recognize 5 types of gastric lesions and 17 types of SB lesions. SS Plus reduced the number of CE images required for review to 873.90 (median, 1000; interquartile range [IQR], 814.50-1000) versus 44,322.73 (median, 42,393; IQR, 31,722.75-54,971.25) for CR. Furthermore, with SSP-AR, endoscopists took 9.54 minutes (median, 8.51; IQR, 6.05-13.13) to complete the CE video reading. In the 342 CE videos, SS Plus identified 411 gastric and 422 SB lesions, whereas 400 gastric and 368 intestinal lesions were detected with CR. Moreover, junior endoscopists remarkably improved their CE image reading ability with SSP-AR.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that the newly upgraded deep learning-based algorithm SS Plus can detect GI lesions and help improve the diagnostic performance of junior endoscopists in interpreting CE videos.

Detachable string magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy for the noninvasive diagnosis of esophageal diseases: A prospective, blind clinical study

BACKGROUND

Traditional esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), an invasive examination method, can cause discomfort and pain in patients. In contrast, magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE), a noninvasive method, is being applied for the detection of stomach and small intestinal diseases, but its application in treating esophageal diseases is not widespread.

AIM

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of detachable string MCE (ds-MCE) for the diagnosis of esophageal diseases.

METHODS

Fifty patients who had been diagnosed with esophageal diseases were prospectively recruited for this clinical study and underwent ds-MCE and conventional EGD. The primary endpoints included the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of ds-MCE for patients with esophageal diseases. The secondary endpoints consisted of visualizing the esophageal and dentate lines, as well as the subjects' tolerance of the procedure.

RESULTS

Using EGD as the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of ds-MCE for esophageal disease detection were 85.71%, 86.21%, 81.82%, 89.29%, and 86%, respectively. ds-MCE was more comfortable and convenient than EGD was, with 80% of patients feeling that ds-MCE examination was very comfortable or comfortable and 50% of patients believing that detachable string v examination was very convenient.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that ds-MCE has the same diagnostic effects as traditional EGD for esophageal diseases and is more comfortable and convenient than EGD, providing a novel noninvasive method for treating esophageal diseases.

Clinical guideline on magnetically controlled capsule gastroscopy (2021 edition)

With the development and generalization of endoscopic technology and screening, clinical application of magnetically controlled capsule gastroscopy (MCCG) has been increasing. In recent years, various types of MCCG are used globally. Therefore, establishing relevant guidelines on MCCG is of great significance. The current guidelines containing 23 statements were established based on clinical evidence and expert opinions, mainly focus on aspects including definition and diagnostic accuracy, application population, technical optimization, inspection process, and quality control of MCCG. The level of evidence and strength of recommendations were evaluated. The guidelines are expected to guide the standardized application and scientific innovation of MCCG for the reference of clinicians.

Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy Versus Conventional Gastroscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The introduction of magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy overcame the restriction of passive capsule endoscopy movement, thus allowing an improved visualization of the gastrointestinal lumen, where other imaging studies seem to be unhelpful. The aim of this study is to systematically review the performance of magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy and evaluate its potential as a less invasive diagnostic method in the detection of gastric lesions.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, Google Scholar, Scopus, Who Global Health Library (GHL), Virtual Health Library (VHL), Clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane Library, and ISI Web of Science databases. Proportion meta-analyses were performed to estimate the pooled sensitivity of magnetically controlled capsuled endoscopy in the detection of gastrointestinal lesions.

RESULTS

Among the 3026 studies that were initially assessed, 7 studies were finally included, with a total of 916 patients and 745 gastric lesions. The mean capsule endoscopy examination time was 21.92±8.87 minutes. The pooled overall sensitivity of magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy was 87% [95% confidence interval (CI), 84%-89%]. Subgroup analysis showed that the sensitivity of identifying gastric ulcers was 82% (95% CI: 71%-89%), gastric polyps was 82% (95% CI: 76%-87%), and gastric erosions was 95% (95% CI: 86%-98%). In general, magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy was well tolerated by the participants with minimal adverse events.

CONCLUSION

The magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy demonstrated an acceptable sensitivity of identifying gastric lesions. Further prospective comparative studies are needed to identify the risks and benefits of this new technique, as well as to determine its role as a replacement for conventional gastroscopy.