1
|
Elli L, Leffler D, Cellier C, Lebwohl B, Ciacci C, Schumann M, Lundin KEA, Chetcuti Zammit S, Sidhu R, Roncoroni L, Bai JC, Lee AR, Dennis M, Robert ME, Rostami K, Khater S, Comino I, Cebolla A, Branchi F, Verdu EF, Stefanolo JP, Wolf R, Bergman-Golden S, Trott N, Scudeller L, Zingone F, Scaramella L, Sanders DS. Guidelines for best practices in monitoring established coeliac disease in adult patients. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 21:198-215. [PMID: 38110546 DOI: 10.1038/s41575-023-00872-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
Coeliac disease (CeD) is an immunological disease triggered by the consumption of gluten contained in food in individuals with a genetic predisposition. Diagnosis is based on the presence of small bowel mucosal atrophy and circulating autoantibodies (anti-type 2 transglutaminase antibodies). After diagnosis, patients follow a strict, life-long gluten-free diet. Although the criteria for diagnosis of this disease are well defined, the monitoring phase has been studied less and there is a lack of specific guidelines for this phase. To develop a set of clinical guidelines for CeD monitoring, we followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. Statements and recommendations with the level of evidence were developed and approved by the working group, which comprised gastroenterologists, pathologists, dieticians and biostatisticians. The proposed guidelines, endorsed by the North American and European coeliac disease scientific societies, make recommendations for best practices in monitoring patients with CeD based on the available evidence. The evidence level is low for many topics, suggesting that further research in specific aspects of CeD would be valuable. In conclusion, the present guidelines support clinicians in improving CeD treatment and follow-up and highlight novel issues that should be considered in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Elli
- Center for Prevention and Diagnosis of Celiac Disease-Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
| | - Daniel Leffler
- Celiac Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christophe Cellier
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, CELAC network, AP-HP Centre, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université de Paris, Cité and Institut National du Cancer, Paris, France
| | - Benjamin Lebwohl
- Celiac Disease Center, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carolina Ciacci
- Center for Celiac Disease, Gastrointestinal Unit, AOU San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D'Aragona and Department of Medicine Surgery Dentistry, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Michael Schumann
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Medizinische Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Infektiologie und Rheumatologie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Knut E A Lundin
- K.G. Jebsen Coeliac Disease Research Centre, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Reena Sidhu
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Diseases, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Leda Roncoroni
- Center for Prevention and Diagnosis of Celiac Disease-Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Julio C Bai
- Department of Medicine, Dr. C. Bonorino Udaondo Gastroenterology Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Anne R Lee
- Celiac Disease Center, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Melinda Dennis
- Celiac Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marie E Robert
- Department of Pathology and Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Kamran Rostami
- Department of Gastroenterology, Palmerston North District Health Board (DHB), Palmerston North, New Zealand
| | - Sherine Khater
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, CELAC network, AP-HP Centre, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université de Paris, Cité and Institut National du Cancer, Paris, France
| | - Isabel Comino
- Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | | | - Federica Branchi
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Medizinische Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Infektiologie und Rheumatologie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Elena F Verdu
- Department of Medicine, Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Juan Pablo Stefanolo
- Department of Medicine, Dr. C. Bonorino Udaondo Gastroenterology Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Randi Wolf
- Program in Nutrition, Department of Health Studies & Applied Educational Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sheba Bergman-Golden
- Program in Nutrition, Department of Health Studies & Applied Educational Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nick Trott
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Diseases, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Luigia Scudeller
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Fabiana Zingone
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
- Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale-Università Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Lucia Scaramella
- Center for Prevention and Diagnosis of Celiac Disease-Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - David S Sanders
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Diseases, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rossi RE, Busacca A, Brandaleone L, Masoni B, Massironi S, Fraquelli M, Repici A. Small Bowel Imaging in Celiac Disease: Is there a role for Small Bowel Ultrasound? Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2023; 25:430-439. [PMID: 37979097 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-023-00907-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The incidence of celiac disease (CD) has increased over the last decades in part due to better disease awareness. Small bowel ultrasound (sb US) enables dynamic assessment of the bowel; although this topic has been addressed, the use of sb US in the diagnosis and in the follow-up of CD patients is limited to a few specialized tertiary referral centers. Herein, we aimed at summarizing the available literature on this topic to better define the potential clinical implications of sb US in CD, also through a comparison with other available diagnostic techniques. RECENT FINDINGS According to available data, sb US can be of help in confirming or excluding CD in patients with clinical suspicion; specifically, the finding of increased gall bladder volume, free abdominal fluid and enlargement of mesenteric lymph nodes reliably and accurately predicts the diagnosis of CD, whereas the absence of bowel dilatation and increased peristalsis may exclude the diagnosis. However, the place of intestinal US in the diagnostic algorithm of CD is likely to vary depending on the probability of the disease in a given population. There are only a few studies on the role of sb US in complicated CD, even if recent reports suggest a possible clinical role. There is a lack of data on follow-up of CD patients, particularly with the aim of detecting a poor diet adherence. According to current data sb US parameters have been shown to be of value in confirming and excluding the diagnosis of CD. Prospective studies with large sample size are warranted to determine whether to include sb US in the available guidelines for CD diagnosis and monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Elisa Rossi
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Anita Busacca
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Brandaleone
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Benedetta Masoni
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Massironi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Center for Autoimmune Liver Diseases, Ospedale San Gerardo, and Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Mirella Fraquelli
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20090, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pennazio M, Rondonotti E, Despott EJ, Dray X, Keuchel M, Moreels T, Sanders DS, Spada C, Carretero C, Cortegoso Valdivia P, Elli L, Fuccio L, Gonzalez Suarez B, Koulaouzidis A, Kunovsky L, McNamara D, Neumann H, Perez-Cuadrado-Martinez E, Perez-Cuadrado-Robles E, Piccirelli S, Rosa B, Saurin JC, Sidhu R, Tacheci I, Vlachou E, Triantafyllou K. Small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2022. Endoscopy 2023; 55:58-95. [PMID: 36423618 DOI: 10.1055/a-1973-3796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 86.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
MR1: ESGE recommends small-bowel capsule endoscopy as the first-line examination, before consideration of other endoscopic and radiological diagnostic tests for suspected small-bowel bleeding, given the excellent safety profile of capsule endoscopy, its patient tolerability, and its potential to visualize the entire small-bowel mucosa.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. MR2: ESGE recommends small-bowel capsule endoscopy in patients with overt suspected small-bowel bleeding as soon as possible after the bleeding episode, ideally within 48 hours, to maximize the diagnostic and subsequent therapeutic yield.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. MR3: ESGE does not recommend routine second-look endoscopy prior to small-bowel capsule endoscopy in patients with suspected small-bowel bleeding or iron-deficiency anemia.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. MR4: ESGE recommends conservative management in those patients with suspected small-bowel bleeding and high quality negative small-bowel capsule endoscopy.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. MR5: ESGE recommends device-assisted enteroscopy to confirm and possibly treat lesions identified by small-bowel capsule endoscopy.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. MR6: ESGE recommends the performance of small-bowel capsule endoscopy as a first-line examination in patients with iron-deficiency anemia when small bowel evaluation is indicated.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. MR7: ESGE recommends small-bowel capsule endoscopy in patients with suspected Crohn's disease and negative ileocolonoscopy findings as the initial diagnostic modality for investigating the small bowel, in the absence of obstructive symptoms or known bowel stenosis.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. MR8: ESGE recommends, in patients with unremarkable or nondiagnostic findings from dedicated small-bowel cross-sectional imaging, small-bowel capsule endoscopy as a subsequent investigation if deemed likely to influence patient management.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. MR9: ESGE recommends, in patients with established Crohn's disease, the use of a patency capsule before small-bowel capsule endoscopy to decrease the capsule retention rate.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. MR10: ESGE recommends device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) as an alternative to surgery for foreign bodies retained in the small bowel requiring retrieval in patients without acute intestinal obstruction.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. MR11: ESGE recommends DAE-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (DAE-ERCP) as a first-line endoscopic approach to treat pancreaticobiliary diseases in patients with surgically altered anatomy (except for Billroth II patients).Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Pennazio
- University Division of Gastroenterology, City of Health and Science University Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Edward J Despott
- Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy, The Royal Free Hospital and UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, London, UK
| | - Xavier Dray
- Sorbonne University, Endoscopy Unit, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Martin Keuchel
- Clinic for Internal Medicine, Agaplesion Bethesda Krankenhaus Bergedorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tom Moreels
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - David S Sanders
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gastroenterology Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Cristiano Spada
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Cristina Carretero
- Department of Gastroenterology. University of Navarre Clinic, Healthcare Research Institute of Navarre, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Pablo Cortegoso Valdivia
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital of Parma, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Luca Elli
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Fuccio
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Gastroenterology Unit, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Begona Gonzalez Suarez
- Gastroenterology Department - ICMDiM, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, DIBAPS, CiBERHED, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anastasios Koulaouzidis
- Centre for Clinical Implementation of Capsule Endoscopy, Store Adenomer Tidlige Cancere Center, Svendborg, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | - Lumir Kunovsky
- 2nd Department of Internal Medicine - Gastroenterology and Geriatrics, University Hospital Olomouc, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.,Department of Surgery, University Hospital Brno, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.,Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Deirdre McNamara
- TAGG Research Centre, Department of Clinical Medicine, Trinity Centre, Tallaght Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Helmut Neumann
- Department of Medicine I, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | | | - Stefania Piccirelli
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Bruno Rosa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira, Guimarães, Portugal.,Life and Health Sciences Research Institute, School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal.,ICVS/3B's, PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal
| | - Jean-Christophe Saurin
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital E. Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - Reena Sidhu
- Academic Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, United Kingdom.,Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Ilja Tacheci
- 2nd Department of Internal Medicine - Gastroenterology, University Hospital Hradec Králové, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | | | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine - Propaedeutic, Research Institute and Diabetes Center, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang Y, Liu X, Liu G, Ji X, Yang H, Liu Z. Design and implementation of a highly integrated dual hemisphere capsule robot. Biomed Microdevices 2022; 24:10. [DOI: 10.1007/s10544-022-00611-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
5
|
Schiepatti A, Cincotta M, Biagi F, Sanders DS. Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2021; 8:bmjgast-2021-000630. [PMID: 34764141 PMCID: PMC8587352 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2021-000630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The differential diagnosis and management of seronegative enteropathies is challenging due to the rarity of these conditions, the overlap of clinical and histopathological features and the current lack of an international consensus on their nomenclature. Design This is a narrative review providing pragmatic guide on the investigation and clinical management of seronegative enteropathies in adults based on the available literature and our clinical experience. Conclusions Seronegative coeliac disease is the most frequent cause among the heterogeneous group of seronegative enteropathies and its diagnosis is confirmed by the clinical and histological response to a gluten-free diet after the exclusion of other causes of villous atrophy. Correct identification and targeted management of seronegative enteropathies is mandatory because of the variation in terms of clinical outcomes and prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annalisa Schiepatti
- Gastroenterology Unit of Pavia Institute, Maugeri Clinical Research Institutes IRCCS, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Marta Cincotta
- Gastroenterology Unit of Pavia Institute, Maugeri Clinical Research Institutes IRCCS, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Federico Biagi
- Gastroenterology Unit of Pavia Institute, Maugeri Clinical Research Institutes IRCCS, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - David S Sanders
- Academic Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kigdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bolwell JG, Wild D. Indications, Contraindications, and Considerations for Video Capsule Endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2021; 31:267-276. [PMID: 33743925 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2020.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Video capsule endoscopy is indicated in a broad range of clinical settings, most commonly in evaluating suspected small bowel bleeding. It is also useful in diagnosing Crohn's disease and monitoring patients with known Crohn's. Video capsule endoscopy has a role in evaluating patients with refractory celiac disease symptoms and in surveying patients with polyposis syndromes. The only absolute contraindication to video capsule endoscopy is luminal gastrointestinal tract obstruction. Despite manufacturer statement, video capsule endoscopy can be used safely in patients with implantable cardiac devices including pacemakers, defibrillators, and ventricular assist devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacquelyn G Bolwell
- Duke University Medical Center, 1151 Duke South, Yellow Zone, Box 3534, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Daniel Wild
- Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zammit SC, Elli L, Scaramella L, Sanders DS, Tontini GE, Sidhu R. Small bowel capsule endoscopy in refractory celiac disease: a luxury or a necessity? Ann Gastroenterol 2021; 34:188-195. [PMID: 33654358 PMCID: PMC7903573 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2021.0586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) has an established role in the management of refractory celiac disease (RCD) for the detection of complications. The aim of this study was to define the role of SBCE in the management of patients with RCD. Method Patients with histologically confirmed RCD who underwent successive SBCEs were recruited retrospectively from 2 tertiary centers. Results Sixty patients with RCD were included. The percentage extent of the affected small bowel (SB) mucosa improved on repeating a second SBCE in 26 patients (49.1%) (median 27.6% vs. 18.1%, P=0.007). Patients with RCD type II had more extensive disease than those with RCD type I on first (41.4% vs. 19.2%, P=0.004) and second (29.8% vs. 12.0%, P=0.016) SBCE. Patients with RCD type I tended to show a greater improvement in percentage of abnormal SB involved on repeat SBCE compared to those with RCD type II (P=0.049). Nine patients (15%) had RCD-related complications. Five patients developed ulcerative jejunoileitis, 3 patients developed enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma, and 1 patient developed cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Conclusions SBCE can be a useful tool for monitoring the effects of treatment, primarily following its initiation. Patients with RCD type II have more extensive SB disease, equating to a more aggressive disease pattern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefania Chetcuti Zammit
- Gastroenterology Department, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, United Kingdom (Stefania Chetcuti Zammit, David S. Sanders, Reena Sidhu)
| | - Luca Elli
- Centre for Prevention and Diagnosis of Coeliac Disease, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Italy (Luca Elli, Lucia Scaramella, Gian Eugenio Tontini)
| | - Lucia Scaramella
- Centre for Prevention and Diagnosis of Coeliac Disease, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Italy (Luca Elli, Lucia Scaramella, Gian Eugenio Tontini)
| | - David S Sanders
- Gastroenterology Department, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, United Kingdom (Stefania Chetcuti Zammit, David S. Sanders, Reena Sidhu)
| | - Gian Eugenio Tontini
- Centre for Prevention and Diagnosis of Coeliac Disease, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Italy (Luca Elli, Lucia Scaramella, Gian Eugenio Tontini)
| | - Reena Sidhu
- Gastroenterology Department, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, United Kingdom (Stefania Chetcuti Zammit, David S. Sanders, Reena Sidhu)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pennazio M, Rondonotti E, Pellicano R, Cortegoso Valdivia P. Small bowel capsule endoscopy: where do we stand after 20 years of clinical use? Minerva Gastroenterol (Torino) 2020; 67:101-108. [PMID: 32677419 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5985.20.02745-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) was introduced into clinical practice almost 20 years ago and, nowadays, it is an essential tool for the study of the small bowel. SBCE allows a radiation-free examination of the entire mucosal surface of the small bowel with high-quality images, limited invasivity and a good safety profile. Nevertheless, the main limitation of SBCE is the lack of any possible direct therapeutic intervention. Indications for SBCE have evolved throughout the years, from "old" ones such as suspected small bowel bleeding (still the main indication for SBCE) to newer ones such as refractory celiac disease, hereditary polyposis syndromes and Crohn's disease. Thus, nowadays SBCE has a key role in the diagnostic algorithms in many conditions. Furthermore, the introduction in the SBCE field of cutting-edge technologies, as artificial intelligence systems, is likely to shorten the reading time making SBCE even more effective and easy to perform. Preliminary data are extremely promising and solid evidence is being gathered by current studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Pennazio
- University Division of Gastroenterology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy -
| | | | - Rinaldo Pellicano
- University Division of Gastroenterology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Pablo Cortegoso Valdivia
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital of Parma, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|