Gastric neoplasms in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: endoscopic and clinicopathologic features

Classification of fundic gland polyps for predicting gastric neoplasms in Helicobacter pylori-negative patients with familial adenomatous polyposis

BACKGROUND

In familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients, fundic gland polyps (FGPs) have been considered a risk factor for gastric neoplasms. We speculated that FGPs in FAP patients spread directionally from the greater to the lesser curvature of the gastric body and investigated the relationship between the distribution of FGPs and gastric neoplasm development.

METHODS

We extracted 195 FAP patients from two institutions and reviewed their medical records. Gastric polyposis was classified based on the FGP distribution (P0, no FGPs; P1, localized in the fundus or greater curvature of the gastric body; P2, spreading to the anterior or posterior wall; P3, involving the proximal half of the lesser curvature; and P4, spreading from P3 to the anal side of the lesser curvature).

RESULTS

The 195 eligible patients were divided into the neoplasm group (n = 54, 28%) and the non-neoplasm group (n = 141, 72%). Overall, 24% of the patients were Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori)-positive. In the FGP distribution, the rate of patients with gastric neoplasm tended to increase significantly with each step towards an increasingly wide distribution from P0 to P4 in H. pylori-negative patients, but not in H. pylori-positive ones. In addition, in H. pylori-negative patients, the likelihood of neoplasm increased consistently from P0 to P4, with the highest odds ratio (95% confidence interval) at P4 of 14.1 (2.5-154.4). Furthermore, multivariate analysis showed P4 and Spigelman stage ≥III were significantly associated with gastric neoplasm development.

CONCLUSION

FGP distribution was correlated with gastric neoplasm development in FAP patients.

Pathology and Clinical Relevance of Gastric Epithelial Dysplasia

Gastric dysplasia is defined as an unequivocally neoplastic epithelium. Dysplastic lesions are characterized by cellular atypia reflective of abnormal differentiation and disorganized glandular architecture. The last few years have been marked by a refinement of the prognosis and risk of progression of gastric dysplasia and the recognition of novel morphologic patterns of dysplasia. Determination of the correct diagnosis and grade of dysplasia are critical steps since it will be predicting the risk of malignant transformation and help tailor appropriate surveillance strategy. This review describes the morphologic characteristics of conventional dysplasia and nonconventional gastric dysplasia that have been more recently characterized.

Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for a residual gastric lesion after unsuccessful endoscopic submucosal dissection in a patient with familial adenomatous polyposis

Watch a video of this article.

Feasibility of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for endoscopic management of gastric neoplasms in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis

BACKGROUND

Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) has been developed as an effective endoscopic intervention for colon, rectum, and duodenum neoplasms. However, there are no comprehensive reports regarding the stomach, and its safety and efficacy are unknown. We aimed to examine the feasibility of UEMR for gastric neoplasms in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP).

METHODS

We retrospectively extracted data of patients with FAP who underwent endoscopic resection (ER) for gastric neoplasms at Osaka International Cancer Institute from February 2009 to December 2018. Elevated gastric neoplasms of ≤ 20 mm in diameter were extracted, and conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (CEMR) and UEMR were compared. Furthermore, outcomes after ER until March 2020 were examined.

RESULTS

91 endoscopically resected gastric neoplasms were extracted from 31 patients with 26 pedigrees, and 12 neoplasms underwent CEMR and 25 neoplasms underwent UEMR was compared. The procedure time was shorter for UEMR than for CEMR. There was no significant difference between en bloc resection and R0 resection rates by EMR methods. CEMR and UEMR showed postoperative hemorrhage rates of 8% and 0%, respectively. Residual/local recurrent neoplasms were identified in four lesions (4%), but additional endoscopic intervention (three UEMR and one cauterization) resulted in a local cure.

CONCLUSION

UEMR was feasible in gastric neoplasms of FAP patients, especially in elevated lesions and those of ≤ 20 mm in diameter.

An update of the variant spectrum of the APC gene in Iranian familial adenomatous polyposis patients

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is an autosomal dominant colorectal cancer syndrome that is characterized by the development of multiple adenomas in the colon and rectum with high penetrance rates. This disease has specific features like the occurrence of pathogenic variations in the APC gene and diverse FAP phenotypes due to the occurrence region. In this study we aimed to evaluate pathogenic variants in exons of the APC gene in Iranian patients with FAP. A total of 35 FAP individuals were referred to the gastroenterology ward of Taleghani Hospital. As the aim of the study was to study the germline variations in the participants, the peripheral blood was collected and after the DNA extraction, PCR, and Sanger sequencing processes for the APC gene, the results were evaluated by the ACMG classification guidelines to report their pathogenicity. Accordingly, out of eight specific detected variants, three of them were novel, and the rest were reported previously. These eight variants were all truncating protein and pathogenic, and they were limited to 849-1378 codons. Overall, detected variants revealed discrepancies and parallels with previous reported cases in terms of quantity, occurrence region, and association with demographic and clinicopathological characteristics of patients. The spectrum of detected variants and the patient's phenotype showed distinct characteristics, such as occurrence in specific regions and the absence of extracolonic symptoms like Congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium (CHRPE). These findings open the path to comprehending the typical symptoms, their rarity, and their occurrence in the Iranian population and also due to the facts, we found that the studying of the APC gene alone for diagnosing FAP disease is not sufficient, and considering other genes are completely rational in the case of sequencing and studying the variants.

Endoscopic findings of gastric neoplasms in familial adenomatous polyposis are associated with the phenotypic variations and grades of dysplasia

Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) are at increased risk of developing gastric neoplasms. However, endoscopic findings have not been sufficiently investigated. We investigated the phenotypic expression of gastric adenoma (low-grade dysplasia) and gastric cancer (high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma) in patients with FAP and clarified their relationships to endoscopic findings. Of 29 patients with FAP who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy between 2005 and 2020, 11 (38%) had histologically confirmed gastric neoplasms, including 23 lesions of gastric adenoma and 9 lesions of gastric cancer. The gastric neoplasms were classified into 3 phenotypes (gastric, mixed, or intestinal type) according to the immunostaining results and evaluated for location (U or M region: upper or middle third of the stomach or L region: lower third of the stomach), color (same as the background mucosa, whitish, or reddish), macroscopic type (elevated, flat, or depressed), background mucosal atrophy (present or absent), fundic gland polyps in the surrounding mucosa (present or absent), and morphologic changes in tumor size. Elevated whitish gastric adenomas were further subdivided by macroscopic type (flat elevated, protruded, or elevated with a central depression) and color (milky- or pinkish-white). The gastric adenomas included gastric (11/23, 48%), mixed (4/23, 17%), and intestinal (8/23, 35%) phenotypes. In contrast, no lesions of gastric cancers showed a gastric phenotype (0/9, 0%), while 5 (56%) and 4 (44%) lesions were intestinal and mixed phenotypes, respectively. Gastric cancers were significantly more likely than gastric adenomas to present as reddish depressed lesions with gastric atrophy. All gastric-type adenomas occurred in non-atrophic mucosa, in mucosa with fundic gland polyps in the periphery, in the U or M region, and as flat elevated or protruded lesions with a milky-white color. Half of the lesions increased in size. Meanwhile, the typical endoscopic features of intestinal-type adenomas included occurrence in the L region and elevated pinkish-white lesions with central depression. None of the intestinal-type adenomas increased in size during the observation period. We believe that these endoscopic features will be useful for the prompt diagnosis and appropriate management of gastric neoplasms in patients with FAP.

Endoscopic Findings and Treatment of Gastric Neoplasms in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

PURPOSE

Gastric neoplasia is a common manifestation of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). This study aimed to elucidate the clinical characteristics, endoscopic features including fundic gland polyposis (FGPsis), and treatment outcomes of gastric neoplasms (GNs) in patients with FAP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 35 patients diagnosed with FAP, including nine patients from four pedigrees who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), were investigated regarding patient characteristics, GN morphology, and treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients (60.0%) had 38 GNs; 33 (86.8%) and 5 (13.2%) were histologically diagnosed with adenocarcinoma and adenoma, respectively. There were no specific patient characteristics related to GNs. Nodule-type GNs were more prevalent in patients with FGP than without (52.2% vs. 0.0%, P=0.002) in the upper body of the stomach. Conversely, depressed-type GNs were fewer in patients with FGPsis than in those without (13.0% vs. 73.3%, P<0.001). Slightly elevated-type GNs were observed in both groups (34.8% vs. 20.0%, P=0.538). Even within pedigrees, the background gastric mucosa and types of GNs varied. In total, 24 GNs were treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and eight with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). EMR was selected for GNs with FGPsis because of the technical difficulty of ESD, resulting in a lower en bloc resection rate (62.5% vs. 100%, P=0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates the necessity of routine EGD surveillance in patients diagnosed with FAP. Notably, the morphology and location of GNs differed between patients with and without FGPsis. Endoscopic treatment and outcomes require more attention in cases of FGPsis.