Natural history of ampullary adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis: a long-term follow-up study

Feasibility of new-generation endocytoscopy for the real-time diagnosis of ampullary lesions: A pilot study (with video)

BACKGROUND AND AIM

An early and accurate diagnosis of ampullary neoplasia is crucial; however, sampling bias is still a major concern. New-generation endocytoscopy enables real-time visualization of cellular structures and enables an accurate pathological prediction; however, its feasibility for small ampullary lesions has never been investigated.

METHODS

We developed a novel endocytoscopic (EC) classification system for ampullary lesions after an expert review and agreement from five experienced endoscopists and one pathologist. We then consecutively enrolled a total of 43 patients with an enlarged ampulla (< 3 cm), all of whom received an endocytoscopic examination. The feasibility of endocytoscopy was evaluated, and the performance of the EC classification system was then correlated with the final histopathology.

RESULTS

In five cases (11.6%), the endocytoscope could not approach the ampulla, and these cases were defined as technical failure. Among the remaining 38 patients, 8 had histopathology-confirmed adenocarcinoma, 15 had adenoma, and 15 had non-neoplastic lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the EC classification system to diagnose ampullary neoplasias were 95.7%, 86.7%, 91.7%, 92.9%, and 92.1%, respectively. Moreover, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the EC classification to diagnose ampullary cancer were 62.5%, 100%, 100%, 90.9%, and 92.1%, respectively. One case with intra-ampullary papillary-tubular carcinoma was classified as having a non-neoplastic lesion by endocytoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

Endocytoscopy and the novel EC classification system demonstrated good feasibility to discriminate ampullary neoplasias from non-neoplastic lesions and may be useful for optical biopsies of clinically suspicious ampullary lesions.

Incidence and risk factors for recurrence of ampullary adenomas after endoscopic papillectomy: Comparative analysis of familial adenomatous polyposis and sporadic ampullary adenomas in an international multicenter cohort

OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) is a minimally invasive therapy for the management of ampullary adenomas (AA). We conducted this multicenter study to assess the incidence of and factors related to the recurrence of AA after EP in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) compared to sporadic AA.

METHODS

We included patients who underwent EP for AA at 10 tertiary hospitals. Adenomatous tissue at the resection site at the time of surveillance endoscopies was considered recurrent disease.

RESULTS

In all, 257 patients, 100 (38.9%) with FAP and 157 (61%) patients with sporadic AA, were included. Over a median of 31 (range, 11-61) months, recurrence occurred in 48/100 (48%) of patients with FAP and 58/157 (36.9%) with sporadic AA (P = 0.07). Two (2%) FAP patients and 10 (6.3%) patients with sporadic AA underwent surgery for recurrence. On multivariable regression analysis, the recurrence in FAP was higher than in sporadic patients after the first year of follow-up. AA size (hazard ratio [HR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.001, 1.056), periampullary extension (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.5, 4.01), and biliary duct dilation (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.2, 3.4) increased the risk, while en bloc resection (HR 0.6, 95% CI 0.41, 0.9) decreased the risk of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Recurrence rates are high after EP. Most recurrences in sporadic patients occur within the first year of follow-up, but after the first year of follow-up in patients with FAP. Recurrences are higher with larger adenomas, biliary duct dilation, and periampullary extensions, and may be mitigated by en bloc resection. These factors should be considered in decision-making with the patients.

Upper Gastrointestinal Neoplasia and Worrisome Thyroid Nodules are Common in Colonic Polyposis of Unknown Etiology (CPUE)

BACKGROUND

Colonic polyposis of unknown etiology (CPUE) is defined as ≥10 cumulative colonic adenomas without a detectable germline pathogenic variant. Surveillance for patients with >100 adenomas is recommended, similar to patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. The utility of extra-colonic screening in patients with 10 to <100 adenomas is not well established.

METHODS

All CPUE patients seen at our center between 2003 and 2022 were included. Patients were categorized based on the range of cumulative colorectal adenoma count: 10 to 19, 20 to 99, and ≥100.

RESULTS

In all, 150 patients were identified of which 20(13.3%) had 10 to 19 cumulative adenomas, 79(52.7%) had 20 to 99 adenomas, and 51(34.0%) had ≥100 adenomas. Compared with patients with 10 to 19 and 20 to 99, patients with ≥100 adenomas were younger (mean 51 vs. 52 vs. 42 y, respectively). Of patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy, duodenal adenomas were found in 33.3%, 10.1%, and 38% in the 3 groups, respectively, P =0.002. Ampullary adenomas were significantly more common in the ≥100 adenoma group (14.8%, P =0.019) compared with 8.3% and 2.9% in the 10 to 19 and 20 to 99 groups, respectively. Thyroid nodules ≥1 cm were not detected in patients with 10 to 19 adenomas but were found in 23.3% and 14.3% of patients with 20 to 99 and ≥100 adenomas, respectively ( P =0.254).

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, duodenal and gastric adenomas occurred in CPUE patients with adenoma count 10 to ≥100 at a relatively high proportion. We recommend a baseline esophagogastroduodenoscopy in all patients with CPUE. While clinically significant thyroid nodules were not detected in patients with 10 to 19 adenomas, they occurred in about one-fifth of the patients with ≥20 adenomas, indicating that thyroid ultrasound is prudent.

Endoscopic scoring indices for assessing disease severity in familial adenomatous polyposis: Systematic review

Background and study aims There is limited consensus on the optimal method for measuring disease severity in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). We aimed to systematically review the operating properties of existing endoscopic severity indices for FAP. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception to February 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that utilized endoscopic outcomes or studies that evaluated the operating properties of endoscopic disease severity indices in FAP. Results A total of 134 studies were included. We evaluated scoring indices and component items of scoring indices, such as polyp count, polyp size, and histology. Partial validation was observed for polyp count and size. The most commonly reported scoring index was the Spigelman classification system, which was used for assessing the severity of duodenal involvement. A single study reported almost perfect interobserver and intra-observer agreement for this system. The InSIGHT polyposis staging system, which was used for assessing colorectal polyp burden, has been partially validated. It showed substantial interobserver reliability; however, the intra-observer reliability was not assessed. Novel criteria for high-risk gastric polyps have been developed and assessed for interobserver reliability. However, these criteria showed a poor level of agreement. Other scoring indices assessing the anal transition zone, duodenal, and colorectal polyps have not undergone validation. Conclusions There are no fully validated endoscopic disease severity indices for FAP. Development and validation of a reliable and responsive endoscopic disease severity instrument will be informative for clinical care and RCTs of pharmacological therapies for FAP.

The Spigelman Staging System and the Risk of Duodenal and Papillary Cancer in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Individuals with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) have an almost 20% lifetime risk of duodenal adenocarcinoma, currently the leading cause of death in FAP. The Spigelman staging system provides guidance on the surveillance intervals and timing of prophylactic surgery. Still, its accuracy in predicting duodenal and papillary cancer development has not been systematically evaluated. We investigated the sensitivity and cancer risk of the Spigelman stages.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review on PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane and used a random-effects model to pool effect sizes.

RESULTS

After removing duplicate entries, we screened 1,170 records and included 27 studies for quantitative analysis. Once duodenal polyposis reaches Spigelman stage IV, the risk of duodenal and papillary cancers increased to 25% (95% confidence interval [CI] 12%-45%). However, the sensitivity of Spigelman stage IV for these cancers was low (51%, 95% CI 42%-60%), especially for papillary adenocarcinoma (39%, 95% CI 16%-68%). We investigated the reasons behind these low values and observed that duodenal cancer risk factors included polyps >10 mm, polyp count >20, and polyps with high-grade dysplasia. Risk factors associated with papillary cancer included a papilla with high-grade dysplasia or >10 mm. The evidence on other risk factors was inconclusive.

DISCUSSION

The current Spigelman staging system had a low sensitivity for duodenal and papillary adenocarcinomas. Two Spigelman variables (duodenal villous histology and polyp count) and the lack of papilla-specific variables likely contributed to the low sensitivity values for duodenal and papillary cancers, respectively. While clinicians may be familiar with its current form, there is an urgent need to update it.

Clinical features and distribution of the APC variant in duodenal and ampullary polyps in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: a multicenter retrospective cohort study in Japan

BACKGROUND

Management of duodenal or ampullary adenomas in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is a major challenge for clinicians. Insufficient data are available to evaluate the clinical manifestations and distribution of adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) variants in these patients.

METHODS

We enrolled 451 patients with data regarding duodenal or ampullary polyps from 632 patients with FAP retrospectively registered in a nationwide Japanese multicenter study. Clinicopathological features and distribution of APC variants were compared between patients with and without duodenal or ampullary polyps.

RESULTS

Duodenal and ampullary polyps were found in 59% and 18% of patients with FAP, respectively. The incidence of duodenal cancer was 4.7% in patients with duodenal polyps, and that of ampullary cancer was 18% in patients with ampullary polyps. Duodenal polyps were significantly associated with the presence of ampullary polyps and jejunal/ileal polyps. Duodenal polyps progressed in 35% of patients with a median follow-up of 776 days, mostly in those with early Spigelman stage lesions. Ampullary polyps progressed in 50% of patients with a follow-up of 1484 days. However, only one patient developed a malignancy. The proportion of patients with duodenal polyps was significantly higher among those with intermediate- or profuse-type APC variants than attenuated-type APC variants. The presence of duodenal polyps was significantly associated with ampullary and jejunal/ileal polyps in patients with intermediate- or profuse-type APC variants.

CONCLUSIONS

Periodic endoscopic surveillance of the papilla of Vater and small intestine should be planned for patients with FAP with duodenal polyps.

Progression of duodenal neoplasia to advanced adenoma in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis

BACKGROUND

Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) have a lifetime risk of developing duodenal adenomas approaching 100%, and the relative risk for duodenal cancer compared with the general population is high. We conducted a retrospective study to investigate the progression of non-ampullary duodenal adenomas (NADAs) and risk factors for advanced lesions in patients with FAP.

METHODS

Of 248 patients with 139 pedigrees at 2 institutes, we assessed 151 patients with 100 pedigrees with a pathogenic germline variant in the adenomatous polyposis coli gene, excluding mosaic variants. We evaluated the prevalence of NADAs in patients with FAP, the progression of these adenomas to advanced adenoma during the observation period, and the risk factors for the lifetime development of high-grade dysplasia (HGD), large (≥ 10 mm) duodenal adenomas, and Spiegelman stage IV.

RESULTS

During the median observation period of 7 years, the incidences of patients with NADAs, with more than 20 polyps, with polyps ≥ 10 mm, with HGD, and with stage IV at the last esophagogastroduodenoscopy were increased 1.6-fold, 1.7-fold, 5-fold, 22-fold, and 9-fold, respectively. Intramucosal cancer occurred in three patients (2%), but no patients developed invasive cancer during the observation period because we performed endoscopic intervention for advanced adenomas. Stage progression was observed in 71% of 113 patients. Stage IV was more common in women, patients with a history of colectomy, and those with a 3' side mutation in their adenomatous polyposis coli gene.

CONCLUSIONS

NADAs in patients with FAP frequently become exacerbated. Our findings suggest that patients with FAP who develop duodenal adenomas should be surveyed to prevent the development of duodenal cancer.

Current clinical practice for familial adenomatous polyposis in Japan: A nationwide multicenter study

Introduction

In Japanese patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), colectomy tends to be postponed or avoided.

Aim

This study aimed to clarify the current clinical practice from a Japanese multicenter cohort study database.

Methods

We analyzed the records of 250 patients with non‐dense FAP who did not require colorectal cancer removal. The clinical outcomes were compared between patients who received colectomy (n = 142) (Group A) and those who did not receive colectomy (n = 108) (Group B).

Results

The colectomy rate based on the age at the final follow‐up examination was 46%, 60%, 54%, 65%, at ≤29, 30–39, 40–49, and ≥ 50 years, respectively (P = .11). The development of colorectal cancer did not differ between Groups A and B (25% vs 22% P = .67); however, colorectal cancer was diagnosed at the Tis stage in 88% of the patients with colorectal cancer in Group B, and 34% of the patients with colorectal cancer in Group A (P < .01). Regarding survival, all patients in Group B were alive at the final follow‐up examination. In contrast, six patients in Group A died, including three patients with desmoid tumors and one with colon cancer.

Conclusion

Over one‐third of patients with non‐dense FAP (polyps ≤ 1000) in Japan did not receive colectomy at >30 years of age, and patients who managed without colectomy showed acceptable survival with the early diagnosis of colorectal cancer, and a very low incidence of desmoid tumor development, indicating that this approach represents a potential option for the management of selected non‐dense FAP patients.

The impact of the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index as a prognostic factor for endoscopic papillectomy in ampullary tumors

BACKGROUND

The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) have been useful for predicting the prognosis based on nutritional condition and comorbidities in surgery and endoscopic mucosal dissection. The age-adjusted CCI (ACCI) has also been reported to be useful in surgery, but it has not been applied to endoscopic treatment. We therefore clarified the prognostic factors associated with ampullary tumors treated with endoscopic papillectomy (EP).

METHODS

From January 2003 to December 2020, 236 patients who underwent EP for sporadic ampullary tumors at Nagoya University Hospital were included in this study. The 5-year survival and ability to predict the prognosis were evaluated in terms of the sex, PNI, ACCI, final pathological diagnosis, and intraductal extension.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up period of 1558 days, 17 patients died. No patient died of the primary disease. The 5-year survival rate was 91.1%. In a univariate analysis, only a high ACCI (≥ 5) was extracted as a significant prognostic factor (Odds ratio, 12.2; 95% confidence interval, 3.81-39.3; p < 0.001). The 5-year survival rates for a low ACCI (≤ 4) and high ACCI were 96.6% and 73.5%, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A high ACCI is an important prognostic factor associated with the 5-year survival and a risk of death from other illness. Ampullary tumors suitable for EP are less likely to be a prognostic factor, and treatment-free follow-up may be acceptable in patients with a high ACCI.