1
|
Nabi Z, Reddy DN. Endoscopic full thickness resection: techniques, applications, outcomes. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 18:257-269. [PMID: 38779710 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2024.2357611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) represents a pivotal advancement in the minimally invasive treatment of gastrointestinal lesions, offering a novel approach for the management of lesions previously deemed challenging or unreachable through conventional endoscopic techniques. AREAS COVERED This review discusses the development, methodologies, applications, and clinical outcomes associated with EFTR, including exposed and device-assisted EFTR, the integration of endoscopic mucosal resection with EFTR in hybrid techniques, and the collaborative approach between laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery (LECS). It encapsulates a comprehensive analysis of the various EFTR techniques tailored to specific lesion characteristics and anatomical locations, underscoring the significance of technique selection based on the lesion's nature and situational context. EXPERT OPINION/COMMENTARY The review underscores EFTR's transformative role in expanding therapeutic horizons for gastrointestinal tumors, emphasizing the importance of technique selection tailored to the unique attributes of each lesion. It highlights EFTR's capacity to facilitate organ-preserving interventions, thereby significantly enhancing patient outcomes and reducing procedural complications. EFTR is a cornerstone in the evolution of gastrointestinal surgery, marking a significant leap forward in the pursuit of precision, safety, and efficacy in tumor management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zaheer Nabi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asian institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India
| | - D Nageshwar Reddy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asian institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang JW, Guo CQ, Zhu SS, Dai N, Liu P, Zhang FB, Zhou HN, Wang JF, Zhou SS, Cao XG. Endoscopic resection of extra-luminal gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors using a snare assisted external traction technique (with video). Dig Liver Dis 2024:S1590-8658(24)00736-9. [PMID: 38744556 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2024.04.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The primary purpose of the study was to explore the clinical efficacy of the novel snare assisted endoscopic resection of extraluminal growing gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (gastric GISTs) using external traction, and the secondary purpose was to compare the novel snare assisted endoscopic resection of extraluminal GISTs with the standard laparoscopic procedure. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the patients who underwent novel external traction assisted endoscopic resection or laparoscopic resection for their extraluminal gastric GIST ≤5 cm in diameter. RESULTS A total of 111 patients (27 in the endoscopic group and 84 in the laparoscopic group) were included in this study. There was no significant difference in tumor diameter and complication rate between the two groups. The overall procedure time was slightly higher in the endoscopic group compared to the laparoscopic group (P = 0.034). However, postoperative hospitalization time (P < 0.001) and postoperative fasting time (P = 0.005) were shorter in the endoscopic group compared to the laparoscopic group. CONCLUSION Snare external traction-assisted endoscopic resection of extraluminal growing gastric GISTs is safe and effective, and it provides a new adjunctive method for endoscopic resection of GIST.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing-Wen Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan, China
| | - Chang-Qing Guo
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan, China
| | - Shan-Shan Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan, China
| | - Nan Dai
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan, China
| | - Ping Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan, China
| | - Fang-Bin Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan, China
| | - Hai-Ning Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan, China
| | - Jian-Feng Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nanyang Central Hospital, Nanyang, 473000, Henan, China
| | - Si-Su Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nanshi Hospital of Nanyang, Nanyang, 473000, Henan, China
| | - Xin-Guang Cao
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li CY, Wang YF, Luo LK, Yang XJ. Present situation of minimally invasive surgical treatment for early gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16:1154-1165. [PMID: 38660633 PMCID: PMC11037069 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i4.1154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Minimally invasive surgery is a kind of surgical operation, which is performed by using professional surgical instruments and equipment to inactivate, resect, repair or reconstruct the pathological changes, deformities and wounds in human body through micro-trauma or micro-approach, in order to achieve the goal of treatment, its surgical effect is equivalent to the traditional open surgery, while avoiding the morbidity of conventional surgical wounds. In addition, it also has the advantages of less trauma, less blood loss during operation, less psychological burden and quick recovery on patients, and these minimally invasive techniques provide unique value for the examination and treatment of gastric cancer patients. Surgical minimally invasive surgical techniques have developed rapidly and offer numerous options for the treatment of early gastric cancer (EGC): endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), underwater EMR (UEMR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR), endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE), submucosal tunnel endoscopic resection), laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS); Among them, EMR, EFTR and LECS technologies have a wide range of applications and different modifications have been derived from their respective surgical operations, such as band-assisted EMR (BA-EMR), conventional EMR (CEMR), over-the-scope clip-assisted EFTR, no-touch EFTR, the inverted LECS, closed LECS, and so on. These new and improved minimally invasive surgeries are more precise, specific and effective in treating different types of EGC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun-Yan Li
- The First Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
| | - Yi-Feng Wang
- The First Clinical Medicine College, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
| | - Li-Kang Luo
- The First Clinical Medicine College, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
| | - Xiao-Jun Yang
- The First Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
- General Surgery Clinical Centre, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
- The Second Department of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
- Lanzhou University People's Clinical Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
- Gansu Research Center of Prevention and Control Project for Digestive Oncology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
- Gansu Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostics and Precision Medicine for Surgical Oncology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lu HF, Li JJ, Zhu DB, Mao LQ, Xu LF, Yu J, Yao LH. Postoperative encapsulated hemoperitoneum in a patient with gastric stromal tumor treated by exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection: A case report. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16:601-608. [PMID: 38463350 PMCID: PMC10921194 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i2.601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric stromal tumors, originating from mesenchymal tissues, are one of the most common tumors of the digestive tract. For stromal tumors originating from the muscularis propria, compared with conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) can remove deep lesions and digestive tract wall tumors completely. However, this technique has major limitations such as perforation, postoperative bleeding, and post-polypectomy syndrome. Herein, we report a case of postoperative serous surface bleeding which formed an encapsulated hemoperitoneum in a patient with gastric stromal tumor that was treated with exposed EFTR. Feasible treatment options to address this complication are described. CASE SUMMARY A 47-year-old male patient had a hemispherical protrusion found during gastric endoscopic ultrasonography, located at the upper gastric curvature adjacent to the stomach fundus, with a smooth surface mucosa and poor mobility. The lesion was 19.3 mm × 16.1 mm in size and originated from the fourth ultrasound layer. Computed tomography (CT) revealed no significant evidence of lymph node enlargement or distant metastasis. Using conventional ESD technology for mucosal pre-resection, exposed EFTR was performed to resect the intact tumor in order to achieve a definitive histopathological diagnosis. Based on its morphology and immunohistochemical expression of CD117 and DOG-1, the lesion was proven to be consistent with a gastric stromal tumor. Six days after exposed EFTR, CT showed a large amount of encapsulated fluid and gas accumulation around the stomach. In addition, gastroscopy suggested intracavitary bleeding and abdominal puncture drainage indicated serosal bleeding. Based on these findings, the patient was diagnosed with serosal bleeding resulting in encapsulated abdominal hemorrhage after exposed EFTR for a gastric stromal tumor. The patient received combined treatments, such as hemostasis under gastroscopy, gastrointestinal decompression, and abdominal drainage. All examinations were normal within six months of follow-up. CONCLUSION This patient developed serous surface bleeding in the gastric cavity following exposed EFTR. Serosal bleeding resulting in an encapsulated hemoperitoneum is rare in clinical practice. The combined treatment may replace certain surgical techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui-Fei Lu
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First People’s Hospital of Huzhou, Huzhou 313000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Jing-Jing Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First People’s Hospital of Huzhou, Huzhou 313000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - De-Bin Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First People’s Hospital of Huzhou, Huzhou 313000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Li-Qi Mao
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First People’s Hospital of Huzhou, Huzhou 313000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Li-Fen Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First People’s Hospital of Huzhou, Huzhou 313000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Jing Yu
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First People’s Hospital of Huzhou, Huzhou 313000, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Lin-Hua Yao
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First People’s Hospital of Huzhou, Huzhou 313000, Zhejiang Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Liu Z, Lin R, Wu R, Li R. Comparison analysis of two different types of endoscopic resection procedures in small gastric subepithelial tumours originating frommuscularis propria. Scand J Gastroenterol 2024; 59:213-217. [PMID: 37698190 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2023.2257826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For small gastric subepithelial tumours originating from the muscularis propria, there is no uniform standard for selecting the best endoscopic resection method. OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic snare resection with a transparent cap (ESR-C) and endoscopic snare resection with an elastic band (ESR-EB) for small gastric subepithelial tumours originating from the muscularis propria to determine which method is more suitable for these tumours. METHODS The data from small gastric subepithelial tumours originating from the muscularis propria treated from Jan 2020 to Dec 2022 were collected. A total of 34 eligible patients were enrolled. Sixteen of these patients were treated with ESR-C, and eighteen were treated with ESR-EB. The general clinical characteristics, tumour location, tumour size,growth pattern,operation time, complete resection rate, and complication rate were compared between the two groups. RESULTS There was no difference in age, sex, tumour location, tumour size, growth pattern, or histological diagnosis after resection (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in operation time, complete resection rate, or follow-up time (p > 0.05). Eight patients (50.5%) in the ESR-C group had complications (6 perforations and 2 bleeding), and 2 (11.11%) in the ESR-EB group had complications (2 perforations). There were significant differences between the two groups (p = 0.037). All perforations were successfully treated. No recurrence or metastasis was observed in either group during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION Both ESR-C and ESR-EB are effective and safe in treating small gastric subepithelial tumours originating from the muscularis propria. However, ESR-EB can significantly reduce the incidence of complications. ESR-EB is likely a better option for small gastric subepithelial tumours originating from the muscularis propria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaohui Liu
- The Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- The Department of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, China
| | - Runhua Lin
- The Department of Pathology, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Immunopathology, Shantou, China
| | - Ruinuan Wu
- The Department of Pathology, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, China
| | - Rui Li
- The Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ni M, Tang D, Ren W, Meng R, Yang J, Yan P, Ding X, Xu G, Lv Y, Chen M, Yang H, Wang L. Risk factors of perforation in gastric stromal tumors during endoscopic resection: a retrospective case-control study. Gastric Cancer 2023; 26:590-603. [PMID: 37061602 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-023-01391-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Perforation is a common complication during endoscopic resection (ER) of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (gGISTs) associated with secondary infections, sepsis, hospitalization time and cost. However, the risk factors of perforation remain controversial. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for perforation during ER of gGISTs. METHODS This retrospective case-control study included consecutive patients with gGISTs who underwent ER between June 2009 and November 2021 at the Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the risk factors for perforation. Sensitivity analyses with propensity scoring (PS) were performed to evaluate the stability of the independent effects. RESULTS In total, 422 patients with gGISTs were included. The following factors were associated with perforation during ER: in the non-intraluminal growth patterns (all confounders adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 5.39, 95% CI 2.99-9.72, P < 0.001), in the gastric fundus (aOR 2.25, 95% CI 1.40-3.60, P = 0.007), sized ≥ 2 cm (aOR 1.70, 95% CI 1.04-2.77, P = 0.035), in the lesser curvature (aOR 0.12, 95% CI 0.05-0.27, P < 0.001), and in the gastric cardia (aOR 0.13, 95% CI 0.04-0.50, P = 0.003). The PS analysis confirmed the stable independent effects of these identified risk factors. CONCLUSIONS ERs of gGISTs in non-intraluminal growth patterns, in the gastric fundus, and with larger tumor size were independent risk factors for perforation. While tumors in the lesser curvature or gastric cardia were independent protective factor for perforation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhan Ni
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, China
| | - Dehua Tang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, China
| | - Wei Ren
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Rui Meng
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jinping Yang
- Oncology Department of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Peng Yan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xiwei Ding
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, China
| | - Guifang Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, China
| | - Ying Lv
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, China
| | - Min Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, China
| | - Hua Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, China
| | - Lei Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Comparison of endoscopic full-thickness resection and ligation-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection for small (≤ 1.5 cm) gastric subepithelial tumors originating from muscularis propria. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:3796-3806. [PMID: 36690893 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-09881-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the treatment of small gastric subepithelial tumors originating from muscularis propria (SET-MPs), endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) has been an effective procedure and ligation-assisted EFTR (EFTR-L) seems a feasible and promising operation. We aimed to compare the therapeutic outcomes of EFTR-L and EFTR to evaluate effect and safety of either method in the treatment of small (≤ 1.5 cm) gastric SET-MPs. METHODS Between January 2018 to May 2022, we retrospectively enrolled a total of 119 patients with gastric SET-MPs treated by EFTR-L (79 patients) or EFTR (40 patients) at Xiangya Hospital Central South University. Clinical characteristics, operation efficacy, adverse events (AEs), and operation cost were compared between the 2 groups. Univariate and multiple logistic and linear regressions were applied to analyze the therapeutic outcomes of the procedure, and covariates were adjusted in the multiple analysis. RESULTS The operation time of EFTR-L group (16.34 ± 5.75 min) was significantly shorter than EFTR group (51.23 ± 21.21 min, P < 0.001), and the difference remained significant after adjusting the covariates (adjusted mean difference, 30.56; 95% confidence interval, 25.65-35.47; P < 0.001). The operation cost of EFTR-L group was lower than EFTR group (1268.52 ± 457.22 vs 1643.18 ± 295.08 $; P < 0.001). The complete resection rate of the EFTR-L group was 98.72% and of the EFTR group 100%. The incidence of abdominal pain in the EFTR-L group (5.06%) was lower than in the EFTR group (27.50%, P = 0.008). A patient in the EFTR group underwent severe pneumoperitoneum and received abdominocentesis during operation. One case of peritonitis occurred in the EFTR-L group but recovered from intensified antibiotic therapy. No delayed blood or perforation occurred. CONCLUSIONS Compared to EFTR, EFTR-L might be a feasible procedure for small (≤ 1.5 cm) gastric SET-MPs due to the acceptable efficacy, shorter operation time, and lower cost.
Collapse
|
8
|
Wang K, Gao P, Cai M, Song B, Zhou P. Endoscopic full-thickness resection, indication, methods and perspectives. Dig Endosc 2023; 35:195-205. [PMID: 36355358 DOI: 10.1111/den.14474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Minimally invasive surgery has emerged as the dominant theme of modern surgery, in which endoscopic surgery plays a key role. The technique of endoscopic surgery has evolved continuously with extensive research, improving the treatment modalities as well as expanding the indications for its use. As an active perforation endoscopic technique, endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is mainly used in the treatment of submucosal tumors (SMTs) of the gastrointestinal tract. With decades of evolution, EFTR has gradually developed into a mature endoscopic operation. Based on clinical experience and current research, indications, techniques, clinical outcomes and future perspectives for EFTR are discussed in this paper. We performed a bibliometric study on EFTR literature and showed robust data through a brief meta-analysis on the topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kehao Wang
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, China
| | - Pingting Gao
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, China
| | - Mingyan Cai
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, China
| | - Baohui Song
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Pinghong Zhou
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kim GE, Kothari S, Siddiqui UD. Nontunneling Full Thickness Techniques for Neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2023; 33:155-168. [PMID: 36375880 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2022.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the world, second in the United States. Although most lesions are managed surgically especially when they have already invaded into the submucosal layer, endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) has become an emerging technique that can serve as a safe and effective alternative management for locally invasive gastrointestinal cancers. This article discusses the indications and various techniques and limitations of nontunneled EFTRs of gastrointestinal cancer and reviews the current literature on the outcomes of EFTR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace E Kim
- Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Chicago, 15841 South Maryland Avenue MC4076, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
| | - Shivangi Kothari
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, University of Rochester Medical Center & Strong Memorial Hospital, 2601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 646, Rochester, NY 14642, USA
| | - Uzma D Siddiqui
- Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Center for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics and Advanced Endoscopy Training, University of Chicago, 35700 South Maryland Avenue MC 8043, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pal P, Ramchandani M, Inavolu P, Reddy DN, Tandan M. Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection: A Systematic Review. JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY 2022. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1755304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background Endoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR) is an emerging therapeutic option for resecting subepithelial lesions (SELs) and epithelial neoplasms. We aimed to systematically review the techniques, applications, outcomes, and complications of EFTR.
Methods A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed. All relevant original research articles involving EFTR were included for the review along with case report/series describing novel/rare techniques from 2001 to February 2022.
Results After screening 7,739 citations, finally 141 references were included. Non-exposed EFTR has lower probability of peritoneal contamination or tumor seeding compared with exposed EFTR. Among exposed EFTR, tunneled variety is associated with lower risk of peritoneal seeding or contamination compared with non-tunneled approach. Closure techniques involve though the scope (TTS) clips, loop and clips, over the scope clips (OTSC), full thickness resection device (FTRD), and endoscopic suturing/plicating/stapling devices. The indications of EFTR range from esophagus to rectum and include SELs arising from muscularis propria (MP), non-lifting adenoma, recurrent adenoma, and even early gastric cancer (EGC) or superficial colorectal carcinoma. Other indications include difficult locations (involving appendicular orifice or diverticulum) and full thickness biopsy for motility disorders. The main limitation of FTRD is feasibility in smaller lesions (<20–25 mm), which can be circumvented by hybrid EFTR techniques. Oncologic resection with lymphadencetomy for superficial GI malignancy can be accomplished by hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) combining EFTR and NOTES. Bleeding, perforation, appendicitis, enterocolonic fistula, FTRD malfunction, peritoneal tumor seeding, and contamination are among various adverse events. Post OTSC artifacts need to be differentiated from recurrent/residual lesions to avoid re-FTRD/surgery.
Conclusion EFTR is safe and effective therapeutic option for SELs, recurrent and non-lifting adenomas, tumors in difficult locations and selected cases of superficial GI carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Partha Pal
- Department of Interventional Endoscopy, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Mohan Ramchandani
- Department of Interventional Endoscopy, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Pradev Inavolu
- Department of Interventional Endoscopy, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Duvvuru Nageshwar Reddy
- Department of Interventional Endoscopy, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Manu Tandan
- Department of Interventional Endoscopy, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Khan S, Cui X, Nasir S, Rafiq SM, Qin B, Bai Q. Advances in endoscopic resection techniques of small gastric tumors originating from the muscularis propria. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1001112. [PMID: 36091154 PMCID: PMC9453668 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1001112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors are common gastrointestinal tumors typically originating from the muscularis propria layer of the stomach. Small gastric stromal tumors are usually detected incidentally during routine endoscopic examination. Although they may have malignant potentially, controversies remain regarding the need for endoscopic resection of small gastric stromal tumors originating from the muscularis propria. According to the guidelines of the European Society of Medical Oncology, all gastrointestinal stromal tumors >2 cm in size should be resected with endoscopic surveillance recommended for tumors <2 cm. Endoscopic resection including endoscopic mucosal dissection (EMD), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection and snare assisted endoscopic resection. However, EMD and ESD procedures may be accompanied with serious complications including perforation, bleeding, and abdominal infection. Snare-assisted endoscopic resection is an alternative approach and has the advantages of a shorter procedure time and a low rate of perforation or bleeding. This study summarizes the safety and feasibility of a novel snare-assisted endoscopic resection technique and highlights the pros and cons of the different endoscopic approaches currently used for subepithelia small gastric tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suliman Khan
- Department of Cerebrovascular Diseases, the Second Affiliated hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Xiaona Cui
- Department of Anesthesiaology, the Second Affiliated hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Safyan Nasir
- Department of Medicine, Allied/District Headquarter Hospital Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan
| | - Shoaib Mohammad Rafiq
- Department of Medicine, District Headquarter Hospital Gujranwala, Gujranwala, Pakistan
| | - Bo Qin
- Translational Medical Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Bo Qin, ; Qian Bai,
| | - Qian Bai
- Department of Anesthesiaology, the Second Affiliated hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Bo Qin, ; Qian Bai,
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lv XH, Lu Q, Yang JL. Cap-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection for small gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95:810-811. [PMID: 35303980 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Xiu-He Lv
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China; Sichuan University-Oxford University Gastrointestinal Cancer Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Qing Lu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China; Sichuan University-Oxford University Gastrointestinal Cancer Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jin-Lin Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China; Sichuan University-Oxford University Gastrointestinal Cancer Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Response. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95:811. [PMID: 35303982 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.12.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
14
|
Endoscopic full-thickness resection for small GI stromal tumors, or should nature take its course? Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95:811-812. [PMID: 35303983 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
|