1
|
Denzer UW. Endoscopic Resection of Malignancies in the Upper GI Tract: A Clinical Algorithm. Visc Med 2024; 40:116-127. [PMID: 38873624 PMCID: PMC11166903 DOI: 10.1159/000538040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Malignancies in the upper gastrointestinal tract are amenable to endoscopic resection at an early stage. Achieving a curative resection is the most stringent quality criterion, but post-resection risk assessment and aftercare are also part of a comprehensive quality program. Summary Various factors influence the achievement of curative resection. These include endoscopic assessment prior to resection using chromoendoscopy and HD technology. If resectability is possible, it is particularly important to delineate the lateral resection margins as precisely as possible before resection. Furthermore, the correct choice of resection technique depending on the lesion must be taken into account. Endoscopic submucosal dissection is the standard for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and gastric carcinoma. In Western countries, it is becoming increasingly popular to treat Barrett's neoplasia over 2 cm in size and/or with suspected submucosal infiltration with en bloc resection instead of piece meal resection. After resection, risk assessment based on the histopathological resection determines the patient's individual risk of lymph node metastases, particularly in the case of high-risk lesions. This is categorized according to the current literature. Key Messages This review presents clinical algorithms for endoscopic resection of esophageal SCC, Barrett's neoplasia, and gastric neoplasia. The algorithms include the pre-resection assessment of the lesion and the resection margins, the adequate resection technique for the respective lesion, as well as the post-resection risk assessment with an evidence-based recommendation for follow-up therapy and surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrike Walburga Denzer
- Section of Endoscopy, Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rubenstein JH, Sawas T, Wani S, Eluri S, Singh S, Chandar AK, Perumpail RB, Inadomi JM, Thrift AP, Piscoya A, Sultan S, Singh S, Katzka D, Davitkov P. AGA Clinical Practice Guideline on Endoscopic Eradication Therapy of Barrett's Esophagus and Related Neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2024; 166:1020-1055. [PMID: 38763697 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) can be effective in eradicating BE and related neoplasia and has greater risk of harms and resource use than surveillance endoscopy. This clinical practice guideline aims to inform clinicians and patients by providing evidence-based practice recommendations for the use of EET in BE and related neoplasia. METHODS The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework was used to assess evidence and make recommendations. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients, conducted an evidence review, and used the Evidence-to-Decision Framework to develop recommendations regarding the use of EET in patients with BE under the following scenarios: presence of (1) high-grade dysplasia, (2) low-grade dysplasia, (3) no dysplasia, and (4) choice of stepwise endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or focal EMR plus ablation, and (5) endoscopic submucosal dissection vs EMR. Clinical recommendations were based on the balance between desirable and undesirable effects, patient values, costs, and health equity considerations. RESULTS The panel agreed on 5 recommendations for the use of EET in BE and related neoplasia. Based on the available evidence, the panel made a strong recommendation in favor of EET in patients with BE high-grade dysplasia and conditional recommendation against EET in BE without dysplasia. The panel made a conditional recommendation in favor of EET in BE low-grade dysplasia; patients with BE low-grade dysplasia who place a higher value on the potential harms and lower value on the benefits (which are uncertain) regarding reduction of esophageal cancer mortality could reasonably select surveillance endoscopy. In patients with visible lesions, a conditional recommendation was made in favor of focal EMR plus ablation over stepwise EMR. In patients with visible neoplastic lesions undergoing resection, the use of either endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection was suggested based on lesion characteristics. CONCLUSIONS This document provides a comprehensive outline of the indications for EET in the management of BE and related neoplasia. Guidance is also provided regarding the considerations surrounding implementation of EET. Providers should engage in shared decision making based on patient preferences. Limitations and gaps in the evidence are highlighted to guide future research opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel H Rubenstein
- Center for Clinical Management Research, Lieutenant Colonel Charles S. Kettles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Barrett's Esophagus Program, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Cancer Control and Population Sciences Program, Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
| | - Tarek Sawas
- Division of Digestive and Liver Disease, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Swathi Eluri
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Shailendra Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia; Advanced Center for Endoscopy, West Virginia University Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Apoorva K Chandar
- Digestive Health Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - John M Inadomi
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Aaron P Thrift
- Section of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Shahnaz Sultan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Siddharth Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - David Katzka
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Perica Davitkov
- Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; Division of Gastroenterology, Veterans Affairs Northeast Ohio Healthcare System, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van Munster SN, Verheij EPD, Ozdemir Ö, Toes-Zoutendijk E, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Nieuwenhuis EA, Cotton CC, Weusten BLAM, Alvarez Herrero L, Alkhalaf A, Schenk BE, Schoon EJ, Curvers WL, Koch AD, de Jonge PJF, Tang TJ, Nagengast WB, Westerhof J, Houben MHMG, Shaheen NJ, Bergman JJGHM, Pouw RE. Incidence and Prediction of Unrelated Mortality After Successful Endoscopic Eradication Therapy for Barrett's Neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2024; 166:1058-1068. [PMID: 38447738 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.02.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Follow-up (FU) strategies after endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) for Barrett's neoplasia do not consider the risk of mortality from causes other than esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). We aimed to evaluate this risk during long-term FU, and to assess whether the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) can predict mortality. METHODS We included all patients with successful EET from the nationwide Barrett registry in the Netherlands. Data were merged with National Statistics for accurate mortality data. We evaluated annual mortality rates (AMRs, per 1000 person-years) and standardized mortality ratio for other-cause mortality. Performance of the CCI was evaluated by discrimination and calibration. RESULTS We included 1154 patients with a mean age of 64 years (±9). During median 59 months (p25-p75 37-91; total 6375 person-years), 154 patients (13%) died from other causes than EAC (AMR, 24.1; 95% CI, 20.5-28.2), most commonly non-EAC cancers (n = 58), cardiovascular (n = 31), or pulmonary diseases (n = 26). Four patients died from recurrent EAC (AMR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.1-1.4). Compared with the general Dutch population, mortality was significantly increased for patients in the lowest 3 age quartiles (ie, age <71 years). Validation of CCI in our population showed good discrimination (Concordance statistic, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72-0.84) and fair calibration. CONCLUSION The other-cause mortality risk after successful EET was more than 40 times higher (48; 95% CI, 15-99) than the risk of EAC-related mortality. Our findings reveal that younger post-EET patients exhibit a significantly reduced life expectancy when compared with the general population. Furthermore, they emphasize the strong predictive ability of CCI for long-term mortality after EET. This straightforward scoring system can inform decisions regarding personalized FU, including appropriate cessation timing. (NL7039).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanne N van Munster
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Eva P D Verheij
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Özge Ozdemir
- University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Toes-Zoutendijk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther A Nieuwenhuis
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Cary C Cotton
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Bas L A M Weusten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lorenza Alvarez Herrero
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Alaa Alkhalaf
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - B Ed Schenk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Erik J Schoon
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter L Curvers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Arjun D Koch
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter-Jan F de Jonge
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thjon J Tang
- Ijsselland Ziekenhuis, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter B Nagengast
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jessie Westerhof
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Martin H M G Houben
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Haga Teaching Hospital, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Nicholas J Shaheen
- Department of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Jacques J G H M Bergman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roos E Pouw
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mesureur L, Deprez PH, Bisschops R, Pouw RE, Weusten BLAM, Barret M, Dewint P, Tate D, Leclercq P, Seewald S, Barbaro F, Baldaque-Silva F, Omae M, Pioche M, Figueiredo Ferreira M, Bourke MJ, Haidry R, Snauwaert C, Eisendrath P, De Maertelaer V, Rosewick N, Devière J, Lemmers A. Safety and efficacy of salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection for Barrett's neoplasia recurrence after radiofrequency ablation. Endoscopy 2024. [PMID: 38626891 DOI: 10.1055/a-2307-6949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for Barrett's neoplasia recurrence after radiofrequency ablation (RFA). METHODS Data from patients at 16 centers were collected for a multicenter retrospective study. Patients who underwent at least one RFA treatment for Barrett's esophagus and thereafter underwent further esophageal ESD for neoplasia recurrence were included. RESULTS Data from 56 patients who underwent salvage ESD between April 2014 and November 2022 were collected. Immediate complications included one muscular tear (1.8%) treated with stent (Agree classification: grade IIIa). Two transmural perforations (3.6%; treated with clips) and five muscular tears (8.9%; two treated with clips) had no clinical impact and were not considered as adverse events. Seven patients (12.5%) developed strictures (grade IIIa), which were treated with balloon dilation. Histological analysis showed 36 adenocarcinoma, 17 high grade dysplasia, and 3 low grade dysplasia. En bloc and R0 resection rates were 89.3% and 66.1%, respectively. Resections were curative in 33 patients (58.9%), and noncurative in 22 patients (39.3%), including 11 "local risk" (19.6%) and 11 "high risk" (19.6%) resections. At the end of follow-up with a median time of 14 (0-75) months after salvage ESD, and with further endoscopic treatment if necessary (RFA, argon plasma coagulation, endoscopic mucosal resection, ESD), neoplasia remission ratio was 37/53 (69.8%) and the median remission time was 13 (1-75) months. CONCLUSION In expert hands, salvage ESD was a safe and effective treatment for recurrence of Barrett's neoplasia after RFA treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauriane Mesureur
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, HUB (Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles), Université Libres de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Pierre H Deprez
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Roos E Pouw
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Bas L A M Weusten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Antonius hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Maximilien Barret
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cochin University Hospital, Université Paris Descartes, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Pieter Dewint
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, AZ Maria-Middelares, Ghent, Belgium
| | - David Tate
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Philippe Leclercq
- Department of Gastroenterology, Clinique CHC MontLégia, Liège, Belgium
| | - Stefan Seewald
- Gastroenterology Center, Klinik Hirslanden, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Federico Barbaro
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Center for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCSS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francisco Baldaque-Silva
- Division of Medicine, Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Masami Omae
- Division of Medicine, Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Mariana Figueiredo Ferreira
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, HUB (Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles), Université Libres de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rehan Haidry
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospital (UCLH), London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Christophe Snauwaert
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Sint-Jan Hospital, Bruges, Belgium
| | - Pierre Eisendrath
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, HUB (Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles), Université Libres de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Viviane De Maertelaer
- Institute of Interdisciplinary Research (IRIBHM), Statistical Unit, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nicolas Rosewick
- Laboratory of Experimental Gastroenterology, CUB Erasme Hospital, HUB (Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jacques Devière
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, HUB (Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles), Université Libres de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Arnaud Lemmers
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, HUB (Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles), Université Libres de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gomes ILC, de Moura DTH, Ribeiro IB, Marques SB, de Sousa Carlos A, Nunes BCM, Hirsch BS, de Oliveira GHP, Trasolini RP, Bernardo WM, de Moura EGH. Cryotherapy versus radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus with or without early esophageal neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Endosc 2024; 57:181-190. [PMID: 38229440 PMCID: PMC10984752 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2023.065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the first-line therapy for dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE). Therefore, cryotherapy has emerged as an alternative treatment option. This study aimed to compare the efficacies of these two techniques based on the rates of complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) and dysplasia (CE-D). Adverse events and recurrence have also been reported. METHODS An electronic search was conducted using the Medline (PubMed), Embase, LILACS, and Google Scholar databases until December 2022. Studies were included comparing cryotherapy and RFA for treating dysplastic BE with or without early esophageal neoplasia. This study was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS Three retrospective cohort studies involving 627 patients were included. Of these, 399 patients underwent RFA, and 228 were treated with cryotherapy. There was no difference in CE-IM (risk difference [RD], -0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.25 to 0.19; p=0.78; I2=86%) as well as in CE-D (RD, -0.03; 95% CI, -0.15 to 0.09; p=0.64; I2=70%) between the groups. The absolute number of adverse events was low, and there was no difference in the recurrence rate. CONCLUSION Cryotherapy and RFA were equally effective in treating dysplastic BE, with or without early esophageal neoplasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Igor Logetto Caetité Gomes
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Igor Braga Ribeiro
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Sérgio Barbosa Marques
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Alexandre de Sousa Carlos
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Bruno Salomão Hirsch
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Roberto Paolo Trasolini
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Wanderley Marques Bernardo
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nguyen CL, Tovmassian D, Zhou M, Seyfi D, Gooley S, Falk GL. Durability of radiofrequency ablation for long-segment and ultralong-segment Barrett's esophagus over 10 years. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:1239-1248. [PMID: 38092973 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10608-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term durability data for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to prevent esophageal adenocarcinoma in long-segment (LSBE) and ultralong-segment Barrett's esophagus (ULSBE) is lacking. This study aimed to determine 10-year cancer progression, eradication, and complication rates in LSBE and ULSBE patients treated with RFA. METHODS Single-surgeon prospective database of patients with LSBE (≥ 3 to < 8 cm) and ULSBE (≥ 8 cm) who underwent RFA (2001-2021) were retrospectively analyzed. Ten-year cancer progression calculated with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Eradication rates, including complete remission of dysplasia (CR-D) and intestinal metaplasia (CR-IM), and rates of recurrence and complications, compared between LSBE and ULSBE groups. RESULTS Ten years after starting treatment, the cancer rate was 14.3% in 56 patients. CR-D and CR-IM rates were 87.5% and 67.9%, respectively. Relapse rates from CR-D were 1.8% and 3.6% from CR-IM. Eradication rates for dysplasia in LSBE and ULSBE patients (90.6% versus 83.3%) and IM (71.9% versus 62.5%) were not significantly different. ULSBE patients required higher mean number of ablation sessions for IM eradication (4.7 versus 3.7, p = 0.032), while complication rates including strictures (4.2% versus 6.2%), perforation (0 versus 0), and bleeding (4.2% versus 3.1%), were similar between ULSBE and LSBE patients, respectively. On multivariate analysis, shorter Barrett's segment and baseline low-grade dysplasia were associated with increased likelihood for eradication of IM and dysplasia. A total number of ablation sessions or endoscopic resections ≥ 3 was associated with reduced likelihood for eradication. CONCLUSION RFA was durable in maintaining dysplasia and IM eradication in both LSBE and ULSBE over 10 years, and with low complication rates. IM eradication was more difficult to achieve in ULSBE. Late development of cancer occurred in 14.3%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chu Luan Nguyen
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, NSW, 2139, Australia
- Department of Surgery, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
| | - David Tovmassian
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, NSW, 2139, Australia
- Department of Surgery, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
| | - Michael Zhou
- Department of Surgery, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
| | - Doruk Seyfi
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, NSW, 2139, Australia
- Department of Surgery, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
| | - Suzanna Gooley
- Sydney Heartburn Clinic, Lindfield, NSW, 2070, Australia
| | - Gregory L Falk
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, NSW, 2139, Australia.
- Department of Surgery, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
- Sydney Heartburn Clinic, Lindfield, NSW, 2070, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mulki R, Qayed E, Yang D, Chua TY, Singh A, Yu JX, Bartel MJ, Tadros MS, Villa EC, Lightdale JR. The 2022 top 10 list of endoscopy topics in medical publishing: an annual review by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Editorial Board. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98:1009-1016. [PMID: 37977661 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Using a systematic literature search of original articles published during 2022 in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and other high-impact medical and gastroenterology journals, the 10-member Editorial Board of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy composed a list of the 10 most significant topic areas in GI endoscopy during the study year. Each Editorial Board member was directed to consider 3 criteria in generating candidate lists-significance, novelty, and global impact on clinical practice-and subject matter consensus was facilitated by the Chair through electronic voting. The 10 identified areas collectively represent advances in the following endoscopic spheres: artificial intelligence, endoscopic submucosal dissection, Barrett's esophagus, interventional EUS, endoscopic resection techniques, pancreaticobiliary endoscopy, management of acute pancreatitis, endoscopic environmental sustainability, the NordICC trial, and spiral enteroscopy. Each board member was assigned a consensus topic area around which to summarize relevant important articles, thereby generating this précis of the "top 10" endoscopic advances of 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramzi Mulki
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Emad Qayed
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Dennis Yang
- Center of Interventional Endoscopy (CIE) Advent Health, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | - Tiffany Y Chua
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Harbor-University of California Los Angeles, Torrance, California, USA
| | - Ajaypal Singh
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jessica X Yu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | | | - Edward C Villa
- NorthShore University Health System, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jenifer R Lightdale
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Smith ZL, Thorgerson AM, Dawson AZ, Wani S. Incidence of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, Mortality, and Esophagectomy in Barrett's Esophagus Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Eradication Therapy. Dig Dis Sci 2023; 68:4439-4448. [PMID: 37863992 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-023-08107-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) is the preferred treatment for Barrett's esophagus (BE)-related neoplasia patients. However, the impact of EET on critical outcomes, outside of clinical trials and registry data, remains scarcely studied. We aimed to assess real-world practice patterns and clinical outcomes among BE patients undergoing EET. METHODS TriNetX is a large research network comprising linked inpatient and outpatient electronic-health record-derived data from over 80,000,000 patients. Patients with a diagnosis of BE from 2015 to 2020 were identified and included if they underwent EET during the study period. The primary outcome was the progression to EAC after index EET. Secondary outcomes included rate of esophagectomy, and all-cause mortality. All outcomes were stratified by baseline histology. The incidence of EAC and all-cause mortality were reported in person-years and adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS A total of 4114 patients were analyzed. Distribution of baseline histology was as follows: NDBE (11.8%), LGD (21.4%), HGD (26.4%), EAC (20.8%), and unspecified (19.6%). The total incidence of EAC after index EET was 6.01 per 1000 person-years (PY) for the entire cohort with the highest rate in HGD patients (12.9/1000 PY). The incidence of all-cause mortality was 13.23 per 1000 PY with the highest rates in EAC patients (25.1 per 1000 PY). Rates of esophagectomy were < 1% for all grades of dysplasia. CONCLUSION The results of this study provide "real-world" data on critical outcomes for BE patients undergoing EET, demonstrating a low risk of incident EAC, all-cause mortality, and need for esophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary L Smith
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Abigail M Thorgerson
- Center for Advancing Population Science, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Aprill Z Dawson
- Center for Advancing Population Science, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Mail Stop F735, 1635 Aurora Court, Rm 2.031, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Weusten BLAM, Bisschops R, Dinis-Ribeiro M, di Pietro M, Pech O, Spaander MCW, Baldaque-Silva F, Barret M, Coron E, Fernández-Esparrach G, Fitzgerald RC, Jansen M, Jovani M, Marques-de-Sa I, Rattan A, Tan WK, Verheij EPD, Zellenrath PA, Triantafyllou K, Pouw RE. Diagnosis and management of Barrett esophagus: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2023; 55:1124-1146. [PMID: 37813356 DOI: 10.1055/a-2176-2440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
MR1 : ESGE recommends the following standards for Barrett esophagus (BE) surveillance:- a minimum of 1-minute inspection time per cm of BE length during a surveillance endoscopy- photodocumentation of landmarks, the BE segment including one picture per cm of BE length, and the esophagogastric junction in retroflexed position, and any visible lesions- use of the Prague and (for visible lesions) Paris classification- collection of biopsies from all visible abnormalities (if present), followed by random four-quadrant biopsies for every 2-cm BE length.Strong recommendation, weak quality of evidence. MR2: ESGE suggests varying surveillance intervals for different BE lengths. For BE with a maximum extent of ≥ 1 cm and < 3 cm, BE surveillance should be repeated every 5 years. For BE with a maximum extent of ≥ 3 cm and < 10 cm, the interval for endoscopic surveillance should be 3 years. Patients with BE with a maximum extent of ≥ 10 cm should be referred to a BE expert center for surveillance endoscopies. For patients with an irregular Z-line/columnar-lined esophagus of < 1 cm, no routine biopsies or endoscopic surveillance are advised.Weak recommendation, low quality of evidence. MR3: ESGE suggests that, if a patient has reached 75 years of age at the time of the last surveillance endoscopy and/or the patient's life expectancy is less than 5 years, the discontinuation of further surveillance endoscopies can be considered. Weak recommendation, very low quality of evidence. MR4: ESGE recommends offering endoscopic eradication therapy using ablation to patients with BE and low grade dysplasia (LGD) on at least two separate endoscopies, both confirmed by a second experienced pathologist.Strong recommendation, high level of evidence. MR5: ESGE recommends endoscopic ablation treatment for BE with confirmed high grade dysplasia (HGD) without visible lesions, to prevent progression to invasive cancer.Strong recommendation, high level of evidence. MR6: ESGE recommends offering complete eradication of all remaining Barrett epithelium by ablation after endoscopic resection of visible abnormalities containing any degree of dysplasia or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC).Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence. MR7: ESGE recommends endoscopic resection as curative treatment for T1a Barrett's cancer with well/moderate differentiation and no signs of lymphovascular invasion.Strong recommendation, high level of evidence. MR8: ESGE suggests that low risk submucosal (T1b) EAC (i. e. submucosal invasion depth ≤ 500 µm AND no [lympho]vascular invasion AND no poor tumor differentiation) can be treated by endoscopic resection, provided that adequate follow-up with gastroscopy, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), and computed tomography (CT)/positrion emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is performed in expert centers.Weak recommendation, low quality of evidence. MR9: ESGE suggests that submucosal (T1b) esophageal adenocarcinoma with deep submucosal invasion (tumor invasion > 500 µm into the submucosa), and/or (lympho)vascular invasion, and/or a poor tumor differentiation should be considered high risk. Complete staging and consideration of additional treatments (chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy and/or surgery) or strict endoscopic follow-up should be undertaken on an individual basis in a multidisciplinary discussion.Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence. MR10 A: ESGE recommends that the first endoscopic follow-up after successful endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) of BE is performed in an expert center.Strong recommendation, very low quality of evidence. B: ESGE recommends careful inspection of the neo-squamocolumnar junction and neo-squamous epithelium with high definition white-light endoscopy and virtual chromoendoscopy during post-EET surveillance, to detect recurrent dysplasia.Strong recommendation, very low level of evidence. C: ESGE recommends against routine four-quadrant biopsies of neo-squamous epithelium after successful EET of BE.Strong recommendation, low level of evidence. D: ESGE suggests, after successful EET, obtaining four-quadrant random biopsies just distal to a normal-appearing neo-squamocolumnar junction to detect dysplasia in the absence of visible lesions.Weak recommendation, low level of evidence. E: ESGE recommends targeted biopsies are obtained where there is a suspicion of recurrent BE in the tubular esophagus, or where there are visible lesions suspicious for dysplasia.Strong recommendation, very low level of evidence. MR11: After successful EET, ESGE recommends the following surveillance intervals:- For patients with a baseline diagnosis of HGD or EAC:at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 10 years after last treatment, after which surveillance may be stopped.- For patients with a baseline diagnosis of LGD:at 1, 3, and 5 years after last treatment, after which surveillance may be stopped.Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bas L A M Weusten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, TARGID, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mario Dinis-Ribeiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, and RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto Portugal
| | - Massimiliano di Pietro
- Early Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge and Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Oliver Pech
- Department of Gastroenterology and Interventional Endoscopy, St. John of God Hospital, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Francisco Baldaque-Silva
- Advanced Endoscopy Center Carlos Moreira da Silva, Department of Gastroenterology, Pedro Hispano Hospital, Matosinhos, Portugal
- Division of Medicine, Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Maximilien Barret
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Cochin Hospital and University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Emmanuel Coron
- Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, IMAD, Centre hospitalier universitaire Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, Nantes, France
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Geneva (HUG), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Glòria Fernández-Esparrach
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Biomedical Research Network on Hepatic and Digestive Diseases (CIBEREHD), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rebecca C Fitzgerald
- Early Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge and Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marnix Jansen
- Department of Histopathology, University College London Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Manol Jovani
- Division of Gastroenterology, Maimonides Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ines Marques-de-Sa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, and RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto Portugal
| | - Arti Rattan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - W Keith Tan
- Early Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge and Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Eva P D Verheij
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pauline A Zellenrath
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Roos E Pouw
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Eusebi LH, Telese A, Castellana C, Engin RM, Norton B, Papaefthymiou A, Zagari RM, Haidry R. Endoscopic Management of Dysplastic Barrett's Oesophagus and Early Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4776. [PMID: 37835470 PMCID: PMC10571849 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15194776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Barrett's oesophagus is a pathological condition whereby the normal oesophageal squamous mucosa is replaced by specialised, intestinal-type metaplasia, which is strongly linked to chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux. A correct endoscopic and histological diagnosis is pivotal in the management of Barrett's oesophagus to identify patients who are at high risk of progression to neoplasia. The presence and grade of dysplasia and the characteristics of visible lesions within the mucosa of Barrett's oesophagus are both important to guide the most appropriate endoscopic therapy. In this review, we provide an overview on the management of Barrett's oesophagus, with a particular focus on recent advances in the diagnosis and recommendations for endoscopic therapy to reduce the risk of developing oesophageal adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo Henry Eusebi
- Gastroenterology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (C.C.); (R.M.E.)
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Andrea Telese
- Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute Cleveland Clinic, London SW1X 7HY, UK; (A.T.); (B.N.)
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Chiara Castellana
- Gastroenterology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (C.C.); (R.M.E.)
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Rengin Melis Engin
- Gastroenterology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (C.C.); (R.M.E.)
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Benjamin Norton
- Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute Cleveland Clinic, London SW1X 7HY, UK; (A.T.); (B.N.)
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospital (UCLH), London NW1 2BU, UK;
- Centre for Obesity Research, Department of Medicine, Rayne Institute, University College London, London NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Apostolis Papaefthymiou
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospital (UCLH), London NW1 2BU, UK;
| | - Rocco Maurizio Zagari
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
- Esophagus and Stomach Organic Diseases Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Rehan Haidry
- Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute Cleveland Clinic, London SW1X 7HY, UK; (A.T.); (B.N.)
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London NW1 2BU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Leifeld L, Denzer U, Frieling T, Jakobs R, Faiss S, Lenzen H, Lynen P, Mayerle J, Ockenga J, Tappe U, Terjung B, Wedemeyer H, Albert J. [Structural, procedural, and personnel requirements for cross-sectoral provision of endoscopic gastroenterological procedures]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2023; 61:799-809. [PMID: 37494075 DOI: 10.1055/a-2105-4995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
Gastroenterology has made crucial advances in diagnostic and interventional endoscopic procedures, opening up improvements in the treatment of many patients. Thus, organ-preserving treatments are increasingly being made possible, replacing more invasive organ resecting surgical procedures. At the same time, the degree of complexity and risks varies widely between different endoscopic procedures. In many cases, simpler endoscopic procedures are now offered on an outpatient basis. Further potential for cross-sectoral performance of endoscopic procedures exists in the case of complex endoscopic procedures, which, however, require special structural, procedural and personnel requirements in order to provide quality-assured treatment, enable post-interventional monitoring and, if necessary, take measures to ensure the success of the treatment. We summarize the essential prerequisites and limitations for cross-sector performance of endoscopic procedures in gastroenterology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ludger Leifeld
- Medizinische Klinik 3 - Allgemeine Innere Medizin und Gastroenterologie, St Bernward Krankenhaus, Hildesheim, Deutschland
| | - Ulrike Denzer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gastroenterologie, Endokrinologie, Stoffwechsel und klinische Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg - Standort Marburg, Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Thomas Frieling
- Medizinische Klinik II, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Deutschland
| | - Ralf Jakobs
- Medizinische Klinik C mit Schwerpunkt Gastroenterologie, Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Deutschland
| | - Siegbert Faiss
- Gastroenterologie, Sana Klinikum Lichtenberg, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Henrike Lenzen
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Deutschland
| | - Petra Lynen
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS), Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Julia Mayerle
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, LMU München, Deutschland
| | - Johann Ockenga
- Medizinische Klinik II, Gesundheit Nord, Klinikverbund Bremen, Deutschland
| | - Ulrich Tappe
- Gastropraxis an der St. Barbara Klinik, Hamm, Deutschland
| | - Birgit Terjung
- Klinik für Innere Medizin und Gastroenterologie, GFO Kliniken Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Heiner Wedemeyer
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Deutschland
| | - Jörg Albert
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, gastroenterologische Onkologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie und Pneumologie, Klinikum der Landeshauptstadt Stuttgart gemeinnützige Kommunalanstalt öffentlichen Rechts (gKAöR), Stuttgart, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Davis C, Kolb JM. Management of Post Ablative Barrett's Esophagus: a Review of Current Practices and Look at Emerging Technologies. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN GASTROENTEROLOGY 2023; 21:125-137. [PMID: 37284351 PMCID: PMC9999319 DOI: 10.1007/s11938-023-00414-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023]
Abstract
Purpose of review Endoscopic eradication therapy is an effective and durable treatment for Barrett's esophagus (BE) related neoplasia, but even after achieving successful eradication, these patients remain at risk for recurrence and require ongoing routine examinations. The optimal surveillance protocol including endoscopic technique, sampling strategy, and timing are still being refined. The aim of this review is to discuss current management principles for the post ablation patient and emerging technologies to guide clinical practice. Recent findings There is increasing evidence to support less frequent surveillance exams in the first year after complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia and a move towards targeted biopsies of visible lesions and sampling high-risk locations such as the gastroesophageal junction. Promising technologies on the horizon that could impact management include novel biomarkers, personalized surveillance intervals, and non-endoscopic approaches. Summary Ongoing high-quality examinations after endoscopic eradication therapy are key to limiting recurrent BE. Surveillance intervals should be based on the pretreatment grade of dysplasia. Future research should focus on technologies and surveillance practices that are most efficient for patients and the healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Davis
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA
| | - Jennifer M Kolb
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Parenteral Nutrition, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 11301 Wilshire Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90073 USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Overwater A, Elias SG, Schoon EJ, Bergman JJGHM, Pouw RE, Weusten BLAM. The course of pain and dysphagia after radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's esophagus-related neoplasia. Endoscopy 2023; 55:255-260. [PMID: 36070753 DOI: 10.1055/a-1929-1448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is effective for eradication of Barrett's esophagus (BE) neoplasia, but little is known on the course of pain and dysphagia after RFA. We aimed to describe the course of post-RFA symptoms and to identify possible associated risk factors. METHODS In this multicenter, observational cohort study, all RFA procedures registered in a prospective database were included. Patient and treatment characteristics were collected from medical records and patients self-registered post-procedural symptoms in electronic symptom diaries for 14 days. Mixed model regression was used for the analyses. RESULTS In total, 255 diaries were completed. Post-RFA pain was reported for 95 % (95 %CI 93-98) of procedures (median duration 14 days; 25th-75th percentiles [p25-p75] 11-14) and major pain for 64 % (95 %CI 58-69; median duration 8 days, p25-p75 3-13). Post-procedural pain significantly increased with BE length, younger age, and no prior ablation. Dysphagia was present after 83 % (95 %CI 79-88) of procedures (median duration 13 days, p25-p75 9-14). The risk of dysphagia decreased with age and increased when patients experienced more pain. CONCLUSIONS RFA treatment for BE-related neoplasia seems a significant burden for patients, and post-procedural symptoms should be taken into account when counseling patients before starting endoscopic eradication therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouk Overwater
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd G Elias
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Erik J Schoon
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Jacques J G H M Bergman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Roos E Pouw
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas L A M Weusten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Weiss S, Pellat A, Corre F, Abou Ali E, Belle A, Terris B, Leconte M, Dohan A, Chaussade S, Coriat R, Barret M. Predictive factors of radiofrequency ablation failure in the treatment of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2023; 47:102065. [PMID: 36494071 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2022.102065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has become the recommended endoscopic treatment for flat dysplastic Barrett's esophagus. However, the outcomes of this treatment are variable across European countries. Our aim was to report the results of a French high-volume center, and to investigate factors associated with treatment failure. METHODS We conducted a single-center retrospective study from a prospectively collected database from 2011 to 2020, including all consecutive patients treated with RFA for flat dysplastic Barrett's esophagus. The primary endpoint was the failure rate of esophageal radiofrequency treatment, defined as either persistence of intestinal metaplasia at the end of treatment, or neoplastic progression during RFA. RESULTS 96 patients treated with a median of four RFA sessions for a mean C5M6 Barrett's esophagus were included in the analysis. Complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia were achieved in 59% and 79% of patients, respectively, resulting in a treatment failure rate of 41%. Ten patients experienced neoplastic progression during treatment. We recorded 14% of post-RFA esophageal strictures, all successfully treated by endoscopic dilatation. Univariate analysis identified the length of Barrett's esophagus and the absence of hiatal hernia as predictive factors for treatment failure, however not confirmed in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION In our experience, RFA of flat dysplastic Barrett's esophagus had a 41% treatment failure rate. The length of the Barrett's segment might be associated with treatment failure. Although our results confirm a role for RFA in the management of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus, the treatment failure rate was higher than expected. This suggest that endoscopists, even in high-volume centers, should receive specific training in RFA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Weiss
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, France
| | - Anna Pellat
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, France; Université de Paris Cité, France
| | - Felix Corre
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, France; Université de Paris Cité, France
| | - Einas Abou Ali
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, France; Université de Paris Cité, France
| | - Arthur Belle
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, France
| | - Benoit Terris
- Department of Pathology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, France; Université de Paris Cité, France
| | - Mahaut Leconte
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, France; Université de Paris Cité, France
| | - Anthony Dohan
- Department of Abdominal and Interventional Imaging, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, France; Université de Paris Cité, France
| | - Stanislas Chaussade
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, France; Université de Paris Cité, France
| | - Romain Coriat
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, France; Université de Paris Cité, France
| | - Maximilien Barret
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, France; Université de Paris Cité, France.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Islam MM, Poly TN, Walther BA, Yeh CY, Seyed-Abdul S, Li YC(J, Lin MC. Deep Learning for the Diagnosis of Esophageal Cancer in Endoscopic Images: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14235996. [PMID: 36497480 PMCID: PMC9736434 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Esophageal cancer, one of the most common cancers with a poor prognosis, is the sixth leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Early and accurate diagnosis of esophageal cancer, thus, plays a vital role in choosing the appropriate treatment plan for patients and increasing their survival rate. However, an accurate diagnosis of esophageal cancer requires substantial expertise and experience. Nowadays, the deep learning (DL) model for the diagnosis of esophageal cancer has shown promising performance. Therefore, we conducted an updated meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the DL model for the diagnosis of esophageal cancer. A search of PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science, between 1 January 2012 and 1 August 2022, was conducted to identify potential studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of the DL model for esophageal cancer using endoscopic images. The study was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Two reviewers independently assessed potential studies for inclusion and extracted data from retrieved studies. Methodological quality was assessed by using the QUADAS-2 guidelines. The pooled accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) were calculated using a random effect model. A total of 28 potential studies involving a total of 703,006 images were included. The pooled accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of DL for the diagnosis of esophageal cancer were 92.90%, 93.80%, 91.73%, 93.62%, and 91.97%, respectively. The pooled AUROC of DL for the diagnosis of esophageal cancer was 0.96. Furthermore, there was no publication bias among the studies. The findings of our study show that the DL model has great potential to accurately and quickly diagnose esophageal cancer. However, most studies developed their model using endoscopic data from the Asian population. Therefore, we recommend further validation through studies of other populations as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Md. Mohaimenul Islam
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
- International Center for Health Information Technology (ICHIT), Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
- Research Center of Big Data and Meta-Analysis, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 116, Taiwan
| | - Tahmina Nasrin Poly
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
- International Center for Health Information Technology (ICHIT), Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
- Research Center of Big Data and Meta-Analysis, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 116, Taiwan
| | - Bruno Andreas Walther
- Deep Sea Ecology and Technology, Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung, Am Handelshafen 12, D-27570 Bremerhaven, Germany
| | - Chih-Yang Yeh
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
| | - Shabbir Seyed-Abdul
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Chuan (Jack) Li
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
- International Center for Health Information Technology (ICHIT), Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
- Research Center of Big Data and Meta-Analysis, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 116, Taiwan
- Department of Dermatology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei 116, Taiwan
- TMU Research Center of Cancer Translational Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Chin Lin
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City 23561, Taiwan
- Taipei Neuroscience Institute, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Vantanasiri K, Iyer PG. State-of-the-art management of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2022; 10:goac068. [PMID: 36381221 PMCID: PMC9651477 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goac068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) has become a standard of care for treatment of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE) and early Barrett's neoplasia. EET mainly consists of removal of any visible lesions via endoscopic resection and eradication of all remaining Barrett's mucosa using endoscopic ablation. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection are the two available resection techniques. After complete resection of all visible lesions, it is crucial to perform endoscopic ablation to ensure complete eradication of the remaining Barrett's segment. Endoscopic ablation can be done either with thermal techniques, including radiofrequency ablation and argon plasma coagulation, or cryotherapy techniques. The primary end point of EET is achieving complete remission of intestinal metaplasia (CRIM) to decrease the risk of dysplastic recurrence after successful EET. After CRIM is achieved, a standardized endoscopic surveillance protocol needs to be implemented for early detection of BE recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kornpong Vantanasiri
- Barrett’s Esophagus Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Prasad G Iyer
- Barrett’s Esophagus Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Verheij EP, van Munster SN, Pouw RE. Follow-up after successful endoscopic therapy for early Barrett's neoplasia: Is it time to talk money yet? Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E1331-E1332. [PMID: 36262508 PMCID: PMC9576328 DOI: 10.1055/a-1931-3841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- E. P.D. Verheij
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S. N. van Munster
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,Sint Antonius Hospital, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
| | - R. E. Pouw
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
van Munster SN, Pouw RE. Solving the puzzle of optimal surveillance after endoscopic eradication therapy of Barrett's esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96:234-236. [PMID: 35705389 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sanne N van Munster
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roos E Pouw
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wani S. Personalized Approach to the Post-Endoscopic Eradication Therapy Barrett's Esophagus Patient. Gastroenterology 2022; 163:39-42. [PMID: 35526573 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
| |
Collapse
|