1
|
Jawaid S, Aboelezz AF, Daba G, Khalaf M, Ayoub F, Zabad N, Mercado M, Keihanian T, Othman M. Prospective feasibility study of a novel rigidizing stabilizing overtube in the resection of complex gastrointestinal polyps. Endoscopy 2024. [PMID: 38991535 DOI: 10.1055/a-2350-4059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A novel rigidizing overtube (ROT) was developed to facilitate endoscopic removal of complex gastrointestinal polyps. We aimed to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of the device in the management of large gastrointestinal polyps. METHODS A prospective, single-center study, conducted between May 2021 and April 2023, enrolled patients undergoing endoscopic resection of colon/duodenal polyps ≥25 mm. Primary outcomes were safety, technical success, and clinical success defined as the ability of ROT to facilitate endoscopic polyp removal without changing the initial resection method. RESULTS 97 patients (98 polyps), with a mean polyp size of 33.2 mm (median 31.1), were evaluated. Technical and clinical success rates were 100% and 84%, respectively. Ileocecal valve location was the only predictor of clinical failure (P = 0.02). The mean time to reach the lesion was 7.2 minutes (95%CI 5-8), with overall resection and procedure times of 53.6 minutes (95%CI 48-61) and 88.9 minutes (95%CI 79-95), respectively. No device-related adverse events occurred. Lower technical (67%) and clinical (67%) success rates were seen for duodenal polyps (n = 6). CONCLUSION The novel ROT was safe, with high technical and clinical success during resection of complex colon polyps. Future studies will determine timing of implementation during routine endoscopic resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salmaan Jawaid
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
| | - Ahmed F Aboelezz
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
| | - Gehad Daba
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
| | - Mai Khalaf
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
| | - Fares Ayoub
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
| | - Noor Zabad
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
| | - Michael Mercado
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
| | - Tara Keihanian
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
| | - Mohamed Othman
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tankel J, Ijner T, Ferri C, Trottenberg T, Dehghani M, Najmeh S, Fiset PO, Alsaddah S, Cools-Lartigue J, Spicer J, Mueller C, Ferri L. Esophagectomy versus observation following endoscopic submucosal dissection of pT1b esophageal adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:1342-1350. [PMID: 38114878 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10623-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management following endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of pT1b esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) remains controversial. This study compared pathological and survival outcomes of patients after endoscopic resection (ER) of pT1b EAC followed by either en bloc esophagectomy or observation. METHODS From 1/12 to 12/22, all patients with pT1b EAC treated with ER were identified from a prospectively maintained departmental database. ESD was curative (all of: Submucosal invasion < 500 μm; G1/2, LVI/PNI-; deep margin-) or non-curative (one or more of Submucosal invasion ≥ 500 μm; G3; LVI/PNI+; deep margin+). Patients were allocated to observation (OBS) or esophagectomy (SURG) based on patient factors/preference and pathological variables. RESULTS 56/171 ERs met the inclusion criteria. ER was curative in 8/56 (14%) and non-curative in 48/56 (86%). OBS was undertaken after 8/27 (30%) curative and 19/27 (70%) non-curative resections. All 29 SURG patients had non-curative ERs and were younger, had lower Charlson comorbidity scores and had more deep margin + lesions than OBS patients. Post-esophagectomy, 15/29 (52%) had no residual disease within the surgical specimen while pT+N-/pT-N+/pT+N+ occurred in 5/3/6 (17%/10%/21%) patients. Of those with residual disease in the surgical specimen, 12/14 (86%) had deep margin + ERs; however, only ESD instead of EMR was independently associated with a lower risk of residual disease (OR 0.431, 95% CI - 0.016 to 1.234, p = 0.045). OBS and SURG patients had equivalent overall survival outcomes and recurrence was low in both groups even following non-curative ER. Follow-up was 28 months (0-102) and 30 months (0-97), respectively. CONCLUSION In select patients, including some of those with a non-curative ESD resection of pT1B EAC, surveillance alone may be appropriate. Alternatives beyond traditional pathological features is needed to direct patient care more accurately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Tankel
- Division of Thoracic and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Tvisha Ijner
- Division of Thoracic and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Chiara Ferri
- Division of Thoracic and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Talia Trottenberg
- Division of Thoracic and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Mehrnoush Dehghani
- Division of Thoracic and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sara Najmeh
- Division of Thoracic and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Pierre Olivier Fiset
- Department of Pathology, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Saba Alsaddah
- Department of Pathology, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jonathan Cools-Lartigue
- Division of Thoracic and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jonathan Spicer
- Division of Thoracic and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Carmen Mueller
- Division of Thoracic and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Lorenzo Ferri
- Division of Thoracic and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kim YI, Khalaf MA, Keihanian T, Salmaan J, Othman MO. Ambulatory Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastrointestinal Neoplasms: Trends and Associated Factors in the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024:S1542-3565(24)00001-6. [PMID: 38184097 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.12.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Revised: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2024]
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive treatment for superficial gastrointestinal (GI) cancers.1,2 ESD practice is expanding significantly in the United States and Western countries. This is attributed to a shorter hospital stay, better quality of life, and fewer adverse events compared with surgery. In the United States, ESD usually is performed and managed in an outpatient setting (ambulatory ESD) or with an overnight hospital stay. This practice is in contrast to Eastern Asian countries, where 3 to 5 days of hospital stay is a routine process for observation after ESD. A Swedish study showed that patients with well-selected colorectal neoplasms (median tumor size, 37 mm) could be managed safely in an outpatient setting after ESD.3 A North American multicenter ESD study also reported that ambulatory ESD was safe and feasible in selected cases (noninvasive cancers, no adverse events, high-volume endoscopists with short procedure time).4 However, procedural and technical aspects that enable safe outpatient management of patients after ESD need to be investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young-Il Kim
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Center for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Mai A Khalaf
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Tropical Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
| | - Tara Keihanian
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Jawaid Salmaan
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Mohamed O Othman
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jacques J, Schaefer M, Wallenhorst T, Rösch T, Lépilliez V, Chaussade S, Rivory J, Legros R, Chevaux JB, Leblanc S, Rostain F, Barret M, Albouys J, Belle A, Labrunie A, Preux PM, Lepetit H, Dahan M, Ponchon T, Crépin S, Marais L, Magne J, Pioche M. Endoscopic En Bloc Versus Piecemeal Resection of Large Nonpedunculated Colonic Adenomas : A Randomized Comparative Trial. Ann Intern Med 2024; 177:29-38. [PMID: 38079634 DOI: 10.7326/m23-1812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic resection of adenomas prevents colorectal cancer, but the optimal technique for larger lesions is controversial. Piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has a low adverse event (AE) rate but a variable recurrence rate necessitating early follow-up. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can reduce recurrence but may increase AEs. OBJECTIVE To compare ESD and EMR for large colonic adenomas. DESIGN Participant-masked, parallel-group, superiority, randomized controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03962868). SETTING Multicenter study involving 6 French referral centers from November 2019 to February 2021. PARTICIPANTS Patients with large (≥25 mm) benign colonic lesions referred for resection. INTERVENTION The patients were randomly assigned by computer 1:1 (stratification by lesion location and center) to ESD or EMR. MEASUREMENTS The primary end point was 6-month local recurrence (neoplastic tissue on endoscopic assessment and scar biopsy). The secondary end points were technical failure, en bloc R0 resection, and cumulative AEs. RESULTS In total, 360 patients were randomly assigned to ESD (n = 178) or EMR (n = 182). In the primary analysis set (n = 318 lesions in 318 patients), recurrence occurred after 1 of 161 ESDs (0.6%) and 8 of 157 EMRs (5.1%) (relative risk, 0.12 [95% CI, 0.01 to 0.96]). No recurrence occurred in R0-resected cases (90%) after ESD. The AEs occurred more often after ESD than EMR (35.6% vs. 24.5%, respectively; relative risk, 1.4 [CI, 1.0 to 2.0]). LIMITATION Procedures were performed under general anesthesia during hospitalization in accordance with the French health system. CONCLUSION Compared with EMR, ESD reduces the 6-month recurrence rate, obviating the need for systematic early follow-up colonoscopy at the cost of more AEs. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE French Ministry of Health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jérémie Jacques
- Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France (J.J., R.L., J.A., H.L., M.D.)
| | - Marion Schaefer
- Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, CHRU de Nancy, Nancy, France (M.S., J.-B.C.)
| | | | - Thomas Rösch
- Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Hospital, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (T.R.)
| | - Vincent Lépilliez
- Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France (V.L., S.L.)
| | | | - Jérôme Rivory
- Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France (J.R., F.R., T.P., M.P.)
| | - Romain Legros
- Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France (J.J., R.L., J.A., H.L., M.D.)
| | | | - Sarah Leblanc
- Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France (V.L., S.L.)
| | - Florian Rostain
- Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France (J.R., F.R., T.P., M.P.)
| | - Maximilien Barret
- Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France (S.C., M.B., A.B.)
| | - Jérémie Albouys
- Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France (J.J., R.L., J.A., H.L., M.D.)
| | - Arthur Belle
- Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France (S.C., M.B., A.B.)
| | - Anaïs Labrunie
- Centre d'Epidémiologie de Biostatistiques et Méthodologie de la Recherche (CEBIMER), CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France (A.L., P.-M.P., J.M.)
| | - Pierre-Marie Preux
- Centre d'Epidémiologie de Biostatistiques et Méthodologie de la Recherche (CEBIMER), CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France (A.L., P.-M.P., J.M.)
| | - Hugo Lepetit
- Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France (J.J., R.L., J.A., H.L., M.D.)
| | - Martin Dahan
- Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France (J.J., R.L., J.A., H.L., M.D.)
| | - Thierry Ponchon
- Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France (J.R., F.R., T.P., M.P.)
| | - Sabrina Crépin
- Service de Pharmacologie-Toxicologie et Pharmacovigilfance-Unité de Vigilance des Essais Cliniques, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France (S.C.)
| | - Loïc Marais
- Direction de la Recherche et de l'Innovation, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France (L.M.)
| | - Julien Magne
- Centre d'Epidémiologie de Biostatistiques et Méthodologie de la Recherche (CEBIMER), CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France (A.L., P.-M.P., J.M.)
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France (J.R., F.R., T.P., M.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mulki R, Qayed E, Yang D, Chua TY, Singh A, Yu JX, Bartel MJ, Tadros MS, Villa EC, Lightdale JR. The 2022 top 10 list of endoscopy topics in medical publishing: an annual review by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Editorial Board. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98:1009-1016. [PMID: 37977661 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Using a systematic literature search of original articles published during 2022 in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and other high-impact medical and gastroenterology journals, the 10-member Editorial Board of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy composed a list of the 10 most significant topic areas in GI endoscopy during the study year. Each Editorial Board member was directed to consider 3 criteria in generating candidate lists-significance, novelty, and global impact on clinical practice-and subject matter consensus was facilitated by the Chair through electronic voting. The 10 identified areas collectively represent advances in the following endoscopic spheres: artificial intelligence, endoscopic submucosal dissection, Barrett's esophagus, interventional EUS, endoscopic resection techniques, pancreaticobiliary endoscopy, management of acute pancreatitis, endoscopic environmental sustainability, the NordICC trial, and spiral enteroscopy. Each board member was assigned a consensus topic area around which to summarize relevant important articles, thereby generating this précis of the "top 10" endoscopic advances of 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramzi Mulki
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Emad Qayed
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Dennis Yang
- Center of Interventional Endoscopy (CIE) Advent Health, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | - Tiffany Y Chua
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Harbor-University of California Los Angeles, Torrance, California, USA
| | - Ajaypal Singh
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jessica X Yu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | | | - Edward C Villa
- NorthShore University Health System, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jenifer R Lightdale
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Koyama Y, Fukuzawa M, Aikawa H, Nemoto D, Muramatsu T, Matsumoto T, Uchida K, Madarame A, Morise T, Yamaguchi H, Kono S, Nagata N, Sugimoto M, Kawai T, Saito Y, Itoi T. Underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors decreases the incidence of post-electrocoagulation syndrome. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 38:1566-1575. [PMID: 37321649 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection (U-ESD) is a recently developed procedure that has the potential to prevent post-ESD coagulation syndrome (PECS) owing to its heat-sink effect. We aimed to clarify whether U-ESD decreases the incidence of PECS compared with conventional ESD (C-ESD). METHODS A total of 205 patients who underwent colorectal ESD (C-ESD: 125; U-ESD: 80) were analyzed. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to adjust for patient backgrounds. Ten C-ESD and two U-ESD patients with muscle damage or perforation during ESD were excluded when comparing PECS. The primary outcome was to compare the incidence of PECS between the U-ESD and C-ESD groups (54 matched pairs). Secondary outcomes were to compare procedural outcomes between the C-ESD and U-ESD groups (62 matched pairs). RESULTS Among the 78 patients who underwent U-ESD, PECS occurred in only one patient (1.3%). Adjusted comparisons between the U-ESD and C-ESD groups demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of PECS in the U-ESD group (0% vs 11.1%; P = 0.027). Median dissection speed was significantly faster in the U-ESD than in the C-ESD group (10.9 mm2 /min vs 6.9 mm2 /min; P < 0.001). En bloc and complete resection rates were 100% in the U-ESD group. Although perforation and delayed bleeding occurred in one patient each (1.6%) as adverse events in the U-ESD group, there were no differences compared with the C-ESD group. CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrates that U-ESD effectively decreases the incidence of PECS and is a faster and safer method for colorectal ESD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yohei Koyama
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Niizashiki Central General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Masakatsu Fukuzawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Aikawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Niizashiki Central General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Daiki Nemoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Niizashiki Central General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Takahiro Muramatsu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taisuke Matsumoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kumiko Uchida
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akira Madarame
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Morise
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hayato Yamaguchi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shin Kono
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoyoshi Nagata
- Department of Gastroenterological Endoscopy, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mitsushige Sugimoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Endoscopy, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Kawai
- Department of Gastroenterological Endoscopy, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yutaka Saito
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takao Itoi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
King W, Draganov P, Gorrepati VS, Hayat M, Aihara H, Karasik M, Ngamruengphong S, Aadam AA, Othman MO, Sharma N, Grimm IS, Rostom A, Elmunzer BJ, Yang D. Safety and feasibility of same-day discharge after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a Western multicenter prospective cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97:1045-1051. [PMID: 36731578 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.01.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 11/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Recent Western studies support the safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for lesions throughout the GI tract. Although admission for observation after ESD is standard in Asia, a more selective approach may optimize resource utilization. We aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of same-day discharge (SDD) after ESD and factors associated with admission. METHODS This was a post hoc analysis of a multicenter, prospective cohort of patients undergoing ESD (2016-2021). The primary end points were safety of SDD and factors associated with post-ESD admission. RESULTS Of 831 patients (median age, 67 years; 57% male) undergoing 831 ESDs (240 performed in the esophagus, 126 in the stomach, and 465 in the colorectum; median lesion size, 44 mm), 588 (71%) were SDD versus 243 (29%) admissions. Delayed bleeding and perforation occurred in 12 (2%) and 4 (.7%) of SDD patients, respectively; only 1 (.2%) required surgery. Of the 243 admissions, 223 (92%) were discharged after ≤24 hours of observation. Interestingly, larger lesion size (>44 mm) was not associated with higher admission rate (odds ratio [OR], .5; 95% confidence interval [CI], .3-.8; P = .001). Lesions in the upper GI tract versus colon (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.6; P = .01), invasive cancer (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-3.1; P = .01), and adverse events (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.5-4.8; P = .001) were independent factors for admission. Admissions were more likely performed by endoscopists with ESD volume <50 cases (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3-3.3; P = .001) with procedure time >75 minutes (OR, 13.5; 95% CI, 8.5-21.3; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS SDD after ESD can be safe and feasible. Patients with invasive cancer, lesions in the upper GI tract, longer procedure times, or procedures performed by low-volume ESD endoscopists are more likely to be admitted postprocedure. Risk stratification of patients for SDD after ESD should help optimize resource utilization and enhance ESD uptake in the West. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02989818.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William King
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Peter Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - V Subhash Gorrepati
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Maham Hayat
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | - Hiroyuki Aihara
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael Karasik
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
| | - Saowanee Ngamruengphong
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Abdul Aziz Aadam
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern Medicine Digestive Health Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mohamed O Othman
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Section, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Neil Sharma
- Division of Interventional Endoscopic Oncology and Surgical Endoscopy, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alaa Rostom
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - B Joseph Elmunzer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Dennis Yang
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth, Orlando, Florida, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hayat M, Yang D, Draganov PV. Third-space endoscopy: the final frontier. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2023; 11:goac077. [PMID: 36632624 PMCID: PMC9831051 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goac077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the years, our growing experience with endoscopic submucosal dissection along with technological advances has solidified our comfort and knowledge on working in the submucosa, also referred to as the "third space." Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) was the first prototype third-space endoscopy (TSE) procedure, demonstrating the feasibility and clinical utility of endoscopic esophagogastric myotomy via submucosal tunneling. The launch of POEM accelerated the evolution of TSE from a vanguard concept to an expanding field with a wide range of clinical applications. In this review, we discuss the status and future directions of multiple TSE interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maham Hayat
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Dennis Yang
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Peter V Draganov
- Corresponding author. Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Florida, 1329 SW 16th Street, Room #5254, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA. Tel: +1-352-273-9474; Fax: +1-352-627-9002;
| |
Collapse
|