1
|
Masgnaux LJ, Grimaldi J, Jacques J, Rivory J, Pioche M. Technical Advances in Endoscopic Resection Techniques for Lower GI Malignancies. Visc Med 2024; 40:128-143. [PMID: 38873630 PMCID: PMC11166901 DOI: 10.1159/000538041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The management of bulky neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract has historically been a surgical pursuit. With advancements in endoscopic techniques, particularly endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), a paradigm shift toward organ preservation has been initiated. These endoscopic methods, developed incrementally since the 1980s, have progressively enabled curative management of lesions with minimal morbidity, challenging the previously unchallenged domain of surgery. Summary This review traces the evolution of endoscopic resection from snare polypectomy and EMR to sophisticated ESD, highlighting the technological innovations that have expanded the scope of endoscopic resection. It discusses the intricacies of various EMR techniques like underwater EMR, anchoring EMR, and hybrid EMR, alongside traction-assisted methods and the use of viscous solutions for submucosal injection. Additionally, the manuscript delves into the advancements in ESD, emphasizing traction strategies, knife technology, and the optimization of endoscopes. The benefits of these advancements are weighed against the challenges in anatomopathological interpretation posed by piecemeal resections. Key Messages The continuous amelioration of endoscopic resection techniques has significantly improved the outcomes of digestive tract lesion management, particularly in achieving R0 resections and reducing recurrence rates. These advancements represent a monumental step toward minimizing the invasiveness of lesion management. However, despite the progress, the necessity for early follow-up post-EMR remains due to the non-negligible recurrence rates, underscoring the need for a rigorous postoperative surveillance regimen. Furthermore, our review suggests that while ESD has transformed the therapeutic landscape, its widespread adoption hinges on further simplification, safety enhancement, and acceleration of the procedure, possibly through innovations like adaptive traction devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis Jean Masgnaux
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Pavillon L, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Jean Grimaldi
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Pavillon L, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Jérémie Jacques
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Jérôme Rivory
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Pavillon L, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Pavillon L, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shigeta K, Kishida Y, Hotta K, Imai K, Ito S, Takada K, Sato J, Minamide T, Yamamoto Y, Yoshida M, Maeda Y, Kawata N, Ishiwatari H, Matsubayashi H, Ono H. Clinical outcomes and learning curve of Tip-in endoscopic mucosal resection for 15-25 mm colorectal neoplasms among non-experts. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024. [PMID: 38646886 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Tip-in endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has a high en bloc resection rate for large colorectal neoplasms. However, non-experts' performance in Tip-in EMR has not been investigated. We investigated whether Tip-in EMR can be achieved effectively and safely even by non-experts. METHODS This retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent Tip-in EMR for 15-25 mm colorectal nonpedunculated neoplasms at a Japanese tertiary cancer center between January 2014 and December 2020. Baseline characteristics, treatment outcomes, learning curve of non-experts, and risk factors of failing self-achieved en bloc resection were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 597 lesions were analyzed (438 by experts and 159 by non-experts). The self-achieved en bloc resection (69.8% vs 88.6%, P < 0.001) and self-achieved R0 resection (58.3% vs 76.5%, P < 0.001) rates were significantly lower in non-experts with <10 cases of experience than in experts, but not in non-experts with >10 cases. Adverse event (P = 0.165) and local recurrence (P = 0.892) rates were not significantly different between experts and non-experts. Risk factors of failing self-achieved en bloc resection were non-polypoid morphology (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.6-7.3, P = 0.001), lesions with an underlying semilunar fold (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.6-7.3, P < 0.001), positive non-lifting sign (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.2-8.0, P = 0.023), and non-experts with an experience of ≤10 cases (OR 3.6, 95% CI 2.1-6.3, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION The clinical outcomes of Tip-in EMR for 15-25 mm lesions performed by non-experts were favorable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kohei Shigeta
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | | | - Kinichi Hotta
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Kenichiro Imai
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Sayo Ito
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Kazunori Takada
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Junya Sato
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | | | - Yoichi Yamamoto
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Masao Yoshida
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Yuki Maeda
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Noboru Kawata
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | | | | | - Hiroyuki Ono
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Okamoto K, Kawaguchi T, Kagemoto K, Kida Y, Mitsui Y, Sato Y, Takayama T. "Tip-in underwater endoscopic mucosal resection" without submucosal injection for superficial nonampullary duodenal adenomas. Endoscopy 2023; 55:E965-E966. [PMID: 37604451 PMCID: PMC10442215 DOI: 10.1055/a-2134-9080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Koichi Okamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Kawaguchi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Japan
| | - Kaizo Kagemoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Japan
| | - Yoshifumi Kida
- Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Mitsui
- Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Japan
| | - Yasushi Sato
- Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Japan
| | - Tetsuji Takayama
- Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Niu C, Bapaye J, Zhang J, Zhu K, Liu H, Farooq U, Zahid S, Elkhapery A, Okolo PI. Tip-in Versus Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Colorectal Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2023; 57:983-990. [PMID: 37389930 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early-stage gastrointestinal neoplasms are frequently treated with conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (C-EMR). However, C-EMR frequently leads to incomplete resection of large colorectal lesions. Tip-in endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), which was recently introduced for en bloc resection of colorectal neoplasms, minimizes slippage during the procedure. METHODS We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies that compared Tip-in EMR with conventional EMR. We searched several electronic databases and included studies that reported on the primary outcomes of en bloc resection rate and complete resection rate, as well as secondary outcomes such as procedure time and procedure-related complications (including perforation and delayed bleeding rate). We used a random effects model to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs for dichotomous data and weighted mean differences with 95% CIs for continuous data. We also conducted several sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of our findings. RESULTS A total of 11 studies involving 1244 lesions (684 in the Tip-in EMR group and 560 in C-EMR group) were included in the meta-analysis. Our meta-analysis showed that compared with conventional EMR, Tip-in EMR significantly increased the en bloc resection rate in patients with colorectal neoplasia (OR=3.61; 95% CI, 2.09-6.23; P <0.00001; I2 =0%) and had a higher complete resection rate (OR=2.49; 95% CI, 1.65-3.76; P <0.0001; I2 =0%). However, the procedure time and rates of procedure-related complications did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS Tip-in EMR outperformed C-EMR for both the en bloc and complete resection of colorectal lesions with similar rates of procedural complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jing Zhang
- Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Patrick I Okolo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pattarajierapan S, Takamaru H, Khomvilai S. Difficult colorectal polypectomy: Technical tips and recent advances. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29:2600-2615. [PMID: 37213398 PMCID: PMC10198056 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i17.2600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Colonoscopy has been shown to be an effective modality to prevent colorectal cancer (CRC) development. CRC reduction is achieved by detecting and removing adenomas, which are precursors of CRC. Most colorectal polyps are small and do not pose a significant challenge for trained and skilled endoscopists. However, up to 15% of polyps are considered “difficult”, potentially causing life-threatening complications. A difficult polyp is defined as any polyp that is challenging for the endoscopist to remove owing to its size, shape, or location. Advanced polypectomy techniques and skills are required to resect difficult colorectal polyps. There were various polypectomy techniques for difficult polyps such as endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), underwater EMR, Tip-in EMR, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), or endoscopic full-thickness resection. The selection of the appropriate modality depends on the morphology and endoscopic diagnosis. Several technologies have been developed to aid endoscopists in performing safe and effective polypectomies, especially complex procedures such as ESD. These advances include video endoscopy system, equipment assisting in advanced polypectomy, and closure devices/techniques for complication management. Endoscopists should know how to use these devices and their availability in practice to enhance polypectomy performance. This review describes several useful strategies and tips for managing difficult colorectal polyps. We also propose the stepwise approach for difficult colorectal polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sukit Pattarajierapan
- Surgical Endoscopy Colorectal Division, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Hiroyuki Takamaru
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Supakij Khomvilai
- Surgical Endoscopy Colorectal Division, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Paspatis GA. Anchoring endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps - keep this weapon in mind. Endoscopy 2023; 55:165-166. [PMID: 36347418 DOI: 10.1055/a-1961-6974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Gregorios A Paspatis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Benizelion General Hospital, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| |
Collapse
|