1
|
Tejedor-Tejada J, Alvarez-Alvarez A, Olmos JM, González-Bernal AC, Jimenez-Jurado A, Robles-Gaitero S, Perez-Pariente JM. Secondary uncovered versus fully-covered metal stents for the management of occluded stent in unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2024:502218. [PMID: 38857753 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2024.502218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2024] [Revised: 05/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) have been widely placed for unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction (UDMBO). However, the dysfunction rate is 19-40% and its treatment is controversial. We aimed asses the efficacy and safety of a secondary biliary stents (uncovered (UC) versus fully-covered (FC) stent) for the management of occluded SEMS. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 2015 and June 2023, 41 patients with UDMBO underwent secondary biliary stent placement as "stent-in-stent" (20 FCSEMS and 21 UCSEMS). The primary outcomes were technical and clinical success of SEMS placement. Secondary outcomes included adverse events (AEs), patency and survival. Patients were prospectively followed until death or loss of follow-up. RESULTS Technical (100% vs 85.5%) and clinical (100% vs 95.2%) success rates were similar in FCSEMS and UCSEMS groups. The median follow-up period was 510 days (range 290-630). The median duration of stent patency of FCSEMS (220 days, IQR 137.5-442.5) was longer than UCSEMS (150 days, IQR 110-362.5) (P=0.395), although stent dysfunction within 6 months was not different between groups. Multivariate analysis indicated that sex (HR=0.909, 0.852-0.970), antitumor treatment (HR=0.248, 0.032-0.441), stent patency (HR=0.992, 0.986-0.998) and clinical success (HR=0.133, 0.026-0.690) were significant factors for overall survival. There were no remarkable differences in AEs. CONCLUSIONS The placement of additional biliary stent using the stent-in-stent method is an effective and safe rescue treatment for patients with UDMBO and occluded stent. In addition, the use of FCSEMS compared UCSEMS has unclear benefits regarding stent patency and overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Tejedor-Tejada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de Cabueñes, Gijón, Asturias, Spain.
| | | | - Jose Manuel Olmos
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de Cabueñes, Gijón, Asturias, Spain
| | | | - Andrea Jimenez-Jurado
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de Cabueñes, Gijón, Asturias, Spain
| | - Samuel Robles-Gaitero
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de Cabueñes, Gijón, Asturias, Spain
| | - Jose M Perez-Pariente
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de Cabueñes, Gijón, Asturias, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Irisawa A. The optimal stent for unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction: Is the exit from the maze of stent selection still not in sight? Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 99:323-325. [PMID: 38368041 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.11.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/19/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Atsushi Irisawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vanella G, Coluccio C, Cucchetti A, Leone R, Dell'Anna G, Giuffrida P, Abbatiello C, Binda C, Fabbri C, Arcidiacono PG. Fully covered versus partially covered self-expandable metal stents for palliation of distal malignant biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 99:314-322.e19. [PMID: 37813199 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) are standardly used for distal malignant biliary obstruction (dMBO). Although data suggest that covered versus uncovered SEMSs increase the time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO), no data are available for fully covered (FC) versus partially covered (PC) designs. METHODS PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were screened up to January 2023 for studies concerning dMBO treated by an FC- or PC-SEMS and describing adverse events (AEs), recurrences, or TRBO for specific design subpopulations. Pooled proportions or means were calculated using a random-effects model. Several subanalyses were preplanned, including a subanalysis restricted to prospective studies and unresectable diseases. Heterogeneity and publication bias were explored. Standardized differences (d-values) were calculated between groups. RESULTS From 1290 records, 62 studies (3327 using FC-SEMSs and 2322 using PC-SEMSs) were included. FC- versus PC-SEMSs showed negligible differences in the rate of total AEs (12% vs 9.9%) and all specific AEs, including cholecystitis (2.5% vs 2.6%). In a subanalysis restricted to prospective studies and unresectable diseases, the rate of RBO was comparable between FC-SEMSs (27.3% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 23.7-31.2], I2 = 35.34%) and PC-SEMSs (25.3% [95% CI, 20.2-30.7], I2 = 85.09%), despite small differences (d-values between .186 and .216) in the rate of ingrowth (.5% vs 2.9%) favoring FC-SEMSs and migration (9.8% vs 4.3%) favoring PC-SEMSs. TRBO was shorter for FC-SEMSs (238 days [95% CI, 191-286], I2 = 63.1%) versus PC-SEMSs (369 days [95% CI, 290-449], I2 = 71.9%; d-value = .116). CONCLUSIONS Despite considerable heterogeneity and small standardized differences, PC-SEMSs consistently exhibited longer TRBO than FC-SEMSs across analyses, without any other differences in AE rates, potentially proposing PC-SEMSs as the standard comparator and TRBO as the primary outcome for future randomized studies on dMBO. (Clinical trial registration number: CRD42023393965.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Vanella
- Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Coluccio
- Gastroenterology Department, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | - Alessandro Cucchetti
- Gastroenterology Department, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy; Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Roberto Leone
- Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; International MD Program, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Dell'Anna
- Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Giuffrida
- Gastroenterology Department, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy; Section of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Health Promotion Sciences Maternal and Infant Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, PROMISE, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Carmela Abbatiello
- Gastroenterology Department, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy; Digestive Disease Postgraduate School, University of Salerno, Italy
| | - Cecilia Binda
- Gastroenterology Department, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Gastroenterology Department, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | - Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono
- Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tsauo J, Fu Y, Liu Y, Zhang X, Zhao H, Li X. Characteristics of four commonly used self-expanding biliary stents: an in vitro study. Eur Radiol Exp 2024; 8:24. [PMID: 38369648 PMCID: PMC10874915 DOI: 10.1186/s41747-024-00425-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Knowledge of the characteristics of self-expanding metal stents (SEMSs) is essential during selection process to ensure the best therapeutic outcomes for patients with malignant biliary obstruction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of four commonly used SEMSs. METHODS This in vitro study analyzed the radial force (RF), crush resistance (CR), axial force (AF), conformability, surface quality, foreshortening, and radiopacity of the following SEMSs: uncovered Wallflex™, EGIS single bare, Zilver 635®, and E-Luminexx™. Two samples of each SEMS type were included in this study, all having identical specifications with a diameter of 10 mm and a length of 6 cm. One sample from each type was analyzed for surface quality, followed by CR, conformability, and foreshortening. The other sample was analyzed for radiopacity, followed by RF and AF. RESULTS The uncovered Wallflex™ exhibited low RF, high CR, high AF, good conformability, poor surface quality, high foreshortening, and good radiopacity. The EGIS single bare demonstrated high RF, high CR, low AF, moderate conformability, good surface quality, high foreshortening, and poor radiopacity. The Zilver 635® displayed moderate RF, low CR, low AF, moderate conformability, moderate surface quality, no foreshortening, and good radiopacity. The E-Luminexx™ showed high RF, moderate CR, high AF, poor conformability, poor surface quality, no foreshortening, and good radiopacity. CONCLUSIONS There was considerable variation in the characteristics among the four evaluated SEMSs. These characteristics should be carefully considered during selection to ensure optimal therapeutic outcomes for patients. RELEVANCE STATEMENT The selection of self-expanding metal stents for treating malignant biliary obstruction requires careful consideration of various characteristics, including their radial force, crush resistance, axial force, conformability, surface quality, foreshortening, and radiopacity. KEY POINTS • The characteristics of self-expanding metal stents (SEMSs) can vary considerably. • Specific situations may warrant the use of SEMSs with particular characteristics over others. • Characteristics of SEMSs must be considered during selection for optimal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaywei Tsauo
- Department of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, China
| | - Yan Fu
- Department of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yue Liu
- Department of Etiology and Carcinogenesis and State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xiaowu Zhang
- Department of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| | - He Zhao
- Department of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xiao Li
- Department of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chung MJ, Park SW, Lee KJ, Park DH, Koh DH, Lee J, Lee HS, Park JY, Bang S, Min S, Park JH, Kim SJ, Park CH. Clinical impact of pancreatic steatosis measured by CT on the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a multicenter prospective trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 99:214-223.e4. [PMID: 37598866 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Pancreatic steatosis (PS) may be a risk factor for acute pancreatitis. Whether it is also a risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) has not been evaluated. This study aimed to determine the impact of PS on PEP development. METHODS This multicenter prospective trial enrolled 786 consecutive patients who underwent contrast-enhanced abdominal CT and subsequent first-time ERCP. PS was evaluated based on pancreatic attenuation on unenhanced CT images. The risk of PS for the development of PEP was evaluated using a logistic regression model. RESULTS Of 527 patients included in the study, 157 (29.8%) had PS and 370 (70.2%) did not. At 24 hours after ERCP, there was a significant difference in the PEP identified in 22 patients (14.0%) in the PS group and 23 patients (6.2%) in the "no PS" (NPS) group (P = .017). Diabetes and hypertension were more common in the PS group than in the NPS group; no differences in dyslipidemia were found. Patients with PS had a higher risk for the development of PEP than those with NPS (odds ratio, 2.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-4.03). No other variables were identified as risk factors for PEP. CONCLUSIONS PS is a significant risk factor for PEP for which preventive measures should be considered. Standardized measurement protocols to assess PS by CT are needed. (Clinical trial registration number: KCT0006068.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moon Jae Chung
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Se Woo Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyong Joo Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea
| | - Da Hae Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Hee Koh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea
| | - Hee Seung Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong Youp Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seungmin Bang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seonjeong Min
- Department of Radiology, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Hoon Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, CHA Ilsan Medical Center, CHA University, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - So Jeong Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chan Hyuk Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Double bare self-expandable metal stent for distal malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97:603. [PMID: 36801021 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
|
7
|
Park SW, Lee KJ, Chung MJ, Jo JH, Lee HS, Park JY, Park SW, Song SY, Kang H, Kim EJ, Kim YS, Cho JH, Bang S. Response. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97:603-604. [PMID: 36801022 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Se Woo Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - Kyong Joo Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - Moon Jae Chung
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Hyun Jo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hee Seung Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Youp Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Woo Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Si Young Song
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Huapyong Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University College of Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea
| | - Eui Joo Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University College of Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea
| | - Yeon Suk Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University College of Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea
| | - Jae Hee Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seungmin Bang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|