Outcomes associated with deep enteroscopy

Intraoperative Enteroscopy: Is There Still a Role?

Intraoperative enteroscopy (IOE) to explore obscure gastrointestinal bleeding is now rarely indicated. IOE allows complete small bowel exploration in 57% to 100% of cases, finds a bleeding source in 80% of cases, allows the recurrence-free management of gastrointestinal bleeding in 76% of cases, but carries a high morbidity and mortality. IOE only remains indicated to guide the intraoperative treatment of preoperatively identified small bowel lesions when nonoperative treatments are unavailable and/or when intraoperative localization by external examination is impossible.

Video Capsule Endoscopy: Technology, Reading, and Troubleshooting

Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) has completed the endoscopic visualization of the entire luminal gastrointestinal tract. VCE can be performed in inpatients and outpatients, requires appropriate bowel preparation before the study, and can be administered via oral swallowing or endoscopic device placement into the small bowel based on outlined patient-dependent factors. Current commercially available VCE systems were reviewed and compared for individual features and attributes. This article focuses on preparation for VCE, currently available VCE technology, how to read a VCE study, and risks and contraindications to VCE.

Double-balloon enteroscopy and outcomes in patients older than 80

BACKGROUND

double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) is becoming more commonly used for investigation of small bowel pathology. Currently, there are limited data to describe its safety and efficacy in the population over age 65.

AIM

to investigate the indications, findings and outcomes of DBE performed in patients older than 80, as well as the correlation between DBE and prior capsule endoscopy (CE) findings.

METHODS

we retrospectively reviewed our large DBE database, including procedures from January 2006 to September 2012. Patients aged 80 or older at the time of DBE were included in the study. The indications, findings, outcomes and diagnostic yield of DBE were calculated by frequency analysis.

RESULTS

two hundred and fifteen DBEs were performed in 130 patients aged 80 or older. The mean age was 83.6 ± 3.03 years (range: 80-94). Twelve patients (9.2%) were assigned an American Society of Anaesthesiologists score of II prior to procedure, 102 patients (78.4%) were assigned a score of III and 16 patients (12.3%) were given a score of IV. The most common indication for DBE was obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (N = 204, 94.9%). One hundred and fourteen patients (87.7%) underwent CE prior to DBE, and correlation between findings of CE and DBE occurred in 74.6% of these patients. The overall diagnostic yield of DBE was 77.2% (N = 166). There were no immediate post-procedural complications or failed procedures.

CONCLUSION

DBE is a safe and effective technique for investigation of the small bowel in patients aged 80 and older. Age alone should not be a contraindication to performing DBE when clinically indicated.

Clinical value of double balloon endoscopy in small intestinal diseases

AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic and therapeutic value and safety of double balloon endoscopy (DBE) in small intestinal diseases.

METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 123 patients who underwent DBE under conscious sedation anesthesia with suspected small intestinal diseases from January 2009 to February 2013 was performed. Oral and anal DBE was performed in 52 and 55 patients, respectively, while 16 patients underwent a combination of both approaches. Endoscopic tissue biopsy of suspicious lesions was performed routinely.

RESULTS: The overall diagnostic yield of DBE was 75.6% (93/123), with nonspecific intestinal inflammations in 37 patients and Crohn's diseases in 17 patients. There were benign or malignant tumors in 13 patients, including small intestine adenocarcinoma in 5 patients, stromal tumors and lymphomas in 3, lipomas in 2, and polyps in 11 (including inflammatory polyps in 8 and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome in 3), vascular diseases in 6 (including vascular malformations in 4 and angiotelectasia in 2), ulcers in 4 and other lesions in 5 (including lymphangiectasia, small intestinal diverticulum, Behcet's disease, entericintussusception and portal hypertensive enteropathy). In addition, there were three cases of external compressive lesions. The overall therapeutic yield of DBE was 9.8% (12/123), including endoscopic snare and electric coagulation or cutting in all polyps and clipping (with a titanium clip) in one case of vascular malformation with active bleeding. There were no severe complications such as bleeding, perforation, and pancreatitis.

CONCLUSION: DBE is a method with high diagnostic value, safety and reliability for small intestinal diseases, and can be used for endoscopic treatment.

Radionuclide small intestine imaging

The aim of this overview article is to present the current possibilities of radionuclide scintigraphic small intestine imaging. Nuclear medicine has a few methods-scintigraphy with red blood cells labelled by means of (99m)Tc for detection of the source of bleeding in the small intestine, Meckel's diverticulum scintigraphy for detection of the ectopic gastric mucosa, radionuclide somatostatin receptor imaging for carcinoid, and radionuclide inflammation imaging. Video capsule or deep enteroscopy is the method of choice for detection of most lesions in the small intestine. Small intestine scintigraphies are only a complementary imaging method and can be successful, for example, for the detection of the bleeding site in the small intestine, ectopic gastric mucosa, carcinoid and its metastasis, or inflammation. Radionuclide scintigraphic small intestine imaging is an effective imaging modality in the localisation of small intestine lesions for patients in whom other diagnostic tests have failed to locate any lesions or are not available.

Intraoperative enteroscopy in the management of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding

Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding has long been a diagnostic challenge because of the relative inaccessibility of small bowel to standard endoscopic evaluation. Intraoperative enteroscopy indications have been reduced by the development of deep enteroscopy techniques and video capsule endoscopy. In light of the current advances, this review aimed at evaluating the intraoperative enteroscopy technical aspects, study results and an ongoing role for intraoperative enteroscopy in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding management. Intraoperative enteroscopy allows complete small bowel exploration in 57-100% of cases. A bleeding source can be identified in 80% of cases. Main causes are vascular lesions (61%) and benign ulcers (19%). When a lesion is found, intraoperative enteroscopy allows successful and recurrence-free management of gastrointestinal bleeding in 76% of cases. The reported mortality is 5% and morbidity is 17%. The recurrence of bleeding is observed in 13-52% of cases. With the recent development of deep enteroscopy techniques, intraoperative enteroscopy remains indicated when small bowel lesions (i) have been identified by a preoperative work-up, (ii) cannot be definitively managed by angiographic embolization, endoscopic treatment or when surgery is required and (iii) cannot be localized by external examination during surgical explorations. Surgeons and endoscopists must exercise caution with intraoperative enteroscopy to avoid the use of a low yield, highly morbid procedure.

Changes in efficiency and resource utilization after increasing experience with double balloon enteroscopy

AIM: To investigate changes in efficiency and resource utilization as a single endoscopist’s experience increased with each subsequent 100 double balloon enteroscopy (DBE) procedures.

METHODS: We reviewed consecutive DBE procedures performed by a single endoscopist at our center over 4 years. DBE was employed when the clinician deemed the procedure was needed for disease management. The approach (oral, anal or both) was chosen based on suspected location of the target lesion. All DBE was performed in a standard endoscopy room with a portable fluoroscopy unit. Fluoroscopy was used to aid in shortening the small intestine and reducing bowel loops. For oral DBE, measurements were taken from the incisors. For anal DBE, measurements were taken from the anal verge. Enteroscopy continued until the target lesion was reached, until the entire small intestine was examined, or until no further progress was deemed possible. The length of small intestine examined (cm), procedure duration (min), and fluoroscopy time (s) were analyzed for sequential groups of 100 DBE. Sub-groups of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures were analyzed using multivariable linear regression.

RESULTS: 802 consecutive DBE procedures were analyzed. For oral DBE, median [interquartile range (IQR)] length of small bowel examined was 230.8 cm (range: 210-248 cm) and for anal DBE was 143.5 cm (range: 100-180 cm). No significant increase in length examined was noted for either the oral or anal approach with advancing position in series. In terms of duration of procedure, the median (IQR) for oral DBE was 86 min (range: 71-105 min) and for anal DBE was 81.3 min (range: 67-105 min). When comparing by the position in series, there was a significant (P value < 0.001) decrease in procedure duration for both upper and lower procedures with increasing experience. Median (IQR) time of exposure to fluoroscopy for oral DBE was 190 s (114-275) compared to anal DBE which was 196.4 s (312-128). This represented a significant (P value < 0.001) decrease in the amount of fluoroscopy used with increasing position in series. For both oral and anal DBE, fluoroscopy time was reduced by greater than 50% over the course of 802 total procedures performed. Sub-group analysis was conducted on therapeutic and diagnostic groups. Out of 802 procedures, a total of 434 were considered therapeutic. Argon plasma coagulation was by far the most common therapeutic intervention performed. There was no evidence of a difference in length examined or fluoroscopy exposure among oral DBE for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, P = 0.91 and P = 0.32 respectively. The median (IQR) for length was 235 cm (range: 178-280 cm) for diagnostic vs 230 cm (range: 180-275 cm) for therapeutic procedures; additionally, fluoroscopy time median (IQR) was 180 s (range: 110-295 s) and 162 s (range: 102-263 s) for no intervention and intervention. However, there was a significant difference in procedure duration among oral DBE (P < 0.001). The median (IQR) was 80 min (range: 60-97 min) and 94 min (range: 77-110 min) for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions respectively.

CONCLUSION: For a single endoscopist, increased DBE experience with number of performed procedures is associated with increased efficiency and decreased resource utilization.

Distribution of bleeding gastrointestinal angioectasias in a Western population

AIM: To define which segments of the gastrointestinal tract are most likely to yield angioectasias for ablative therapy.

METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for patients treated in the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Gastroenterology clinics between the dates of July 1, 2007 and October 1, 2010. The selection of cases for review was initiated by use of our electronic medical record to identify all patients with a diagnosis of angioectasia, angiodysplasia, or arteriovenous malformation. Of these cases, chart reviews identified patients who had a complete evaluation of their gastrointestinal tract as defined by at least one upper endoscopy, colonoscopy and small bowel capsule endoscopy within the past three years. Patients without evidence of overt gastrointestinal bleeding or iron deficiency anemia associated with intestinal angioectasias were classified as asymptomatic and excluded from this analysis. Thirty-five patients with confirmed, bleeding intestinal angioectasias who had undergone complete endoscopic evaluation of the gastrointestinal tract were included in the final analysis.

RESULTS: A total of 127 cases were reviewed. Sixty-six were excluded during subsequent screening due to lack of complete small bowel evaluation and/or lack of documentation of overt bleeding or iron deficiency anemia. The 61 remaining cases were carefully examined with independent review of endoscopic images as well as complete capsule endoscopy videos. This analysis excluded 26 additional cases due to insufficient records/images for review, incomplete capsule examination, poor capsule visualization or lack of confirmation of typical angioectasias by the principal investigator on independent review. Thirty-five cases met criteria for final analysis. All study patients were age 50 years or older and 13 patients (37.1%) had chronic kidney disease stage 3 or higher. Twenty of 35 patients were taking aspirin (81 mg or 325 mg), clopidogrel, and/or warfarin, with 8/20 on combination therapy. The number and location of angioectasis was documented for each case. Lesions were then classified into the following segments of the gastrointestinal tract: esophagus, stomach, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, right colon and left colon. The location of lesions within the small bowel observed by capsule endoscopy was generally defined by percentage of total small bowel transit time with times of 0%-9%, 10%-39%, and 40%-100% corresponding to the duodenum, jejunum and ileum, respectively. Independent review of complete capsule studies allowed for deviation from this guideline if capsule passage was delayed in one or more segments. In addition, the location and number of angioectasias observed in the small bowel was further modified or confirmed by subsequent device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) performed in the 83% of cases. In our study population, angioectasias were most commonly found in the jejunum (80%) followed by the duodenum (51%), stomach (22.8%), and right colon (11.4%). Only two patients were found to have angioectasias in the ileum (5.7%). Twenty-one patients (60%) had angioectasias in more than one location.

CONCLUSION: Patients being considered for endoscopic ablation of symptomatic angioectasias should undergo push enteroscopy or anterograde DAE and re-inspection of the right colon.

Double-balloon endoscopy in clinical practice: where are we now?

Double-balloon endoscopy (DBE) was developed in 2000 for the diagnosis and treatment of small bowel diseases. Although use rates still differ between Eastern and Western countries, DBE quickly reached a broad global diffusion. Together with capsule endoscopy (CE), DBE represented 'a revolution' for the management of small bowel diseases because of its therapeutic capabilities. At present, the main indications for DBE in clinical practice are obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, Crohn's disease and familial polyposis. In the setting of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, DBE seems to have similar diagnostic performances as capsule endoscopy, but it allows for a more definitive diagnosis and the treatment of identified lesions. The main contribution of DBE in the management of Crohn's disease patients is its therapeutic capabilities. Indeed, several recently published studies have suggested that endoscopic dilation of small bowel strictures can delay or, in the near future, could even replace surgical interventions. Also, for patients with familial polyposis syndromes, DBE can represent a viable alternative to small bowel surgery. The complication rate of DBE appears to be low; major complications, such as pancreatitis, bleeding and perforation, have been reported in approximately 1% of all diagnostic DBE whereas the complication rate for therapeutic procedures is about 5%.

Small intestinal vascular malformation bleeding: diagnosis by double-balloon enteroscopy combined with abdominal contrast-enhanced CT examination

Aim

The purpose of this study was to explore the value of double-balloon enteroscopy combined with abdominal vascular-enhanced CT examination for the diagnosis of intestinal vascular malformation bleeding, to explore a simple and effective method for the diagnosis of small intestinal vascular malformation bleeding.

Methods

Ten patients with intestinal bleeding were first examined with double-balloon enteroscopy. If active bleeding considered as vascular malformation was observed, the patient underwent abdominal vascular-enhanced CT examination. If no active bleeding was observed with double-balloon enteroscopy, the patient also underwent abdominal vascular-enhanced CT examination. When intestinal vascular malformation bleeding was diagnosed with double-balloon enteroscopy and/or abdominal vascular-enhanced CT examination, the patient underwent surgical operation and vascular malformation was confirmed with pathologic diagnosis.

Results

In ten patients who underwent double-balloon enteroscopy examination, active intestinal bleeding was observed in seven patients and no active bleeding was observed in three patients. All ten patients underwent abdominal vascular-enhanced CT examination and vascular malformation was detected in all the patients with confirmation by pathologic diagnosis.

Conclusion

Double-balloon enteroscopy combined with abdominal vascular enhanced CT examination is a simple and effective method for the diagnosis of intestinal vascular malformation bleeding.

Spiral enteroscopy: prospective U.S. multicenter study in patients with small-bowel disorders

BACKGROUND

The performance characteristics of spiral enteroscopy have not been well-described.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the technical performance, diagnostic and therapeutic yields, and safety of oral spiral enteroscopy in patients with suspected or established small-bowel pathology.

DESIGN

Prospective, multicenter, cohort study, with centralized database.

SETTING

Ten U.S. tertiary-care medical centers.

PATIENTS

This study involved 148 participants, of whom 101 were referred for obscure bleeding. All participants referred for antegrade deep enteroscopy were considered eligible.

INTERVENTION

Spiral enteroscopy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Examination duration, depth of insertion, spiral enteroscopy findings, mucosal assessment upon withdrawal, and patient symptom assessment (day 1 and day 7 after the procedure).

RESULTS

Spiral enteroscopy was successful in 93% of patients, with a median depth of insertion beyond the angle of Treitz of 250 cm (range 10-600 cm). The mean (± standard deviation) total procedure time was 45.0 ± 16.2 minutes for all procedures, and 35.4 minutes for diagnostic procedures. The diagnostic yield was 65%, of which 48% revealed more than one abnormality. The most common findings were angiectasias (61.5%), inflammation (7.5%), and neoplasia (6.8%). Argon plasma coagulation ablation accounted for 64% of therapeutic interventions.

LIMITATIONS

This was not a randomized, controlled trial of deep enteroscopy modalities.

CONCLUSION

Spiral enteroscopy appears to be safe and effective for evaluation of the small bowel. The procedure duration, depth of insertion, and diagnostic and therapeutic yields compare favorably with previously published data on other deep enteroscopy techniques such as single-balloon and double-balloon enteroscopy. Comparative studies are warranted.