1
|
Kundu R, Rana SS, Suneel R, Dey P. EUS-guided FNAC in intra-abdominal lesions: Technique of tissue acquisition, ancillary testing, pearls and perils, and prospects. Diagn Cytopathol 2023. [PMID: 37154168 DOI: 10.1002/dc.25153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound enables visualization of lesions within and in the vicinity of the gastrointestinal tract. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology (EUS-FNAC) helps in targeting various luminal and extraluminal lesions both diagnostically and therapeutically. Various intra-abdominal organs amenable to EUS-FNA include the gastrointestinal tract (GIT), pancreas, kidney, adrenal gland, liver, bile duct, gallbladder, spleen, and lymph nodes. EUS-FNAC is mostly done for pancreatic and intra-abdominal lymph nodal lesions. In the present review, we have discussed various aspects of EUS-FNAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reetu Kundu
- Department of Cytology and Gynecologic Pathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Surinder Singh Rana
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Rachagiri Suneel
- Department of Pathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Pranab Dey
- Department of Cytology and Gynecologic Pathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mie T, Sasaki T, Kanata R, Furukawa T, Takeda T, Kasuga A, Matsuyama M, Ozaka M, Sasahira N. Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition Using a 20-Gauge Menghini Needle with a Lateral Forward Bevel and a 22-Gauge Franseen Needle: A Single-Center Large Cohort Study. Clin Endosc 2021; 54:730-738. [PMID: 33657780 PMCID: PMC8505170 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2020.251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims Several fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needles are available for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition. However, there is disagreement on which type of needle has the best diagnostic yield. The aim of this study was to compare the performance and safety of two commonly used EUS-FNB needles.
Methods We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNB between June 2016 and March 2020 in our hospital. Two types of needles were evaluated: a 20-gauge Menghini needle with a lateral forward bevel and a 22-gauge Franseen needle. Rapid on-site evaluation was performed in all the cases. A multivariate analysis was performed to clarify the negative predictive factors for obtaining a histological diagnosis. Propensity score matching was performed to compare the diagnostic yields of these two needles.
Results We analyzed 666 patients and 690 lesions. The overall diagnostic rate of histology alone was 88.8%, and the overall adverse event rate was 1.5%. Transduodenal access and small lesions (≤2 cm) were identified as negative predictive factors for obtaining a histological diagnosis. After propensity score matching, 482 lesions were analyzed. The diagnostic accuracy rates of histology in the M and F needle groups were 89.2% and 88.8%, respectively (p=1.00). Conclusions Both the needles showed high diagnostic yield, and no significant difference in performance was observed between the two.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takafumi Mie
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Sasaki
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryo Kanata
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takaaki Furukawa
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Takeda
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akiyoshi Kasuga
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masato Matsuyama
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masato Ozaka
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoki Sasahira
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Löhr JM, Beuers U, Vujasinovic M, Alvaro D, Frøkjær JB, Buttgereit F, Capurso G, Culver EL, de-Madaria E, Della-Torre E, Detlefsen S, Dominguez-Muñoz E, Czubkowski P, Ewald N, Frulloni L, Gubergrits N, Duman DG, Hackert T, Iglesias-Garcia J, Kartalis N, Laghi A, Lammert F, Lindgren F, Okhlobystin A, Oracz G, Parniczky A, Mucelli RMP, Rebours V, Rosendahl J, Schleinitz N, Schneider A, van Bommel EF, Verbeke CS, Vullierme MP, Witt H. European Guideline on IgG4-related digestive disease - UEG and SGF evidence-based recommendations. United European Gastroenterol J 2020; 8:637-666. [PMID: 32552502 DOI: 10.1177/2050640620934911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The overall objective of these guidelines is to provide evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related digestive disease in adults and children. IgG4-related digestive disease can be diagnosed only with a comprehensive work-up that includes histology, organ morphology at imaging, serology, search for other organ involvement, and response to glucocorticoid treatment. Indications for treatment are symptomatic patients with obstructive jaundice, abdominal pain, posterior pancreatic pain, and involvement of extra-pancreatic digestive organs, including IgG4-related cholangitis. Treatment with glucocorticoids should be weight-based and initiated at a dose of 0.6-0.8 mg/kg body weight/day orally (typical starting dose 30-40 mg/day prednisone equivalent) for 1 month to induce remission and then be tapered within two additional months. Response to initial treatment should be assessed at week 2-4 with clinical, biochemical and morphological markers. Maintenance treatment with glucocorticoids should be considered in multi-organ disease or history of relapse. If there is no change in disease activity and burden within 3 months, the diagnosis should be reconsidered. If the disease relapsed during the 3 months of treatment, immunosuppressive drugs should be added.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J-Matthias Löhr
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden and Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ulrich Beuers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Miroslav Vujasinovic
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden and Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Domenico Alvaro
- Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Frank Buttgereit
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gabriele Capurso
- PancreatoBiliary Endoscopy and EUS Division Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Emma L Culver
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital and Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Enrique de-Madaria
- Gastroenterology Department, Alicante University General Hospital, ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain
| | - Emanuel Della-Torre
- School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Unit of Immunology, Rheumatology, Allergy and Rare Disease (UnIRAR), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Sönke Detlefsen
- Department of Pathology, Odense Pancreas Center (OPAC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Enrique Dominguez-Muñoz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Piotr Czubkowski
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Nutritional Disorders and Pediatrics, The Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Nils Ewald
- Institute of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, Johannes Wesling University hospital, Minden, Germany and Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Luca Frulloni
- Department of Medicine, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Natalya Gubergrits
- Department of Internal Medicine, Donetsk National Medical University, Lyman, Ukraine
| | - Deniz Guney Duman
- Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Julio Iglesias-Garcia
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Nikolaos Kartalis
- Department of Abdominal Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Andrea Laghi
- Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Frank Lammert
- Department of Medicine II, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany
| | - Fredrik Lindgren
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Grzegorz Oracz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Nutritional Disorders and Pediatrics, The Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Andrea Parniczky
- Institute for Translational Medicine, Szentágothai Research Centre, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary; Heim Pál National Insitute of Pediatrics, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | - Vinciane Rebours
- Pancreatology Department, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, Université de Paris, France
| | - Jonas Rosendahl
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Martin Luther University, Halle, Germany
| | - Nicolas Schleinitz
- Département de Médicine Interne Timone, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Alexander Schneider
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Klinikum Bad Hersfeld, Bad Hersfeld, Germany
| | - Eric Fh van Bommel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dutch National Center of Expertise Retroperitoneal Fibrosis, Albert Schweitzer hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Heiko Witt
- Else Kröner-Fresenius-Zentrum für Ernährungsmedizin, Paediatric Nutritional Medicine, Technische Universität München, Freising, Germany
| | -
- See list at the end of this article
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Conti CB, Cereatti F, Grassia R. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: the fine needle aspiration or fine needle biopsy dilemma. Is the best needle yet to come? World J Gastrointest Endosc 2019. [DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i8.000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|
5
|
Conti CB, Cereatti F, Grassia R. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: the fine needle aspiration or fine needle biopsy dilemma. Is the best needle yet to come? World J Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 11:454-471. [PMID: 31523377 PMCID: PMC6715568 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i8.454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2019] [Revised: 06/30/2019] [Accepted: 07/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is currently the standard of care for sampling pancreatic solid masses by using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). The accuracy of the technique is reported to be high, especially if coupled with the rapid on site evaluation (ROSE), and it has a high safety profile. However, FNA presents some limitations, such as the small amount of tissue that can be collected and the inability of obtaining a core tissue with intact histological architecture, which is relevant to perform immunohistochemical analysis, molecular profiling and, therefore, targeted therapies. Moreover, the presence of the ROSE by an expert cytopathologist is very important to maximize the diagnostic yield of FNA technique; however, it is not widely available, especially in small centers. Hence, the introduction of EUS fine needle biopsy (FNB) with a new generation of needles, which show a high safety profile too and a satisfying diagnostic accuracy even in the absence of ROSE, could be the key to overcome the limitations of FNA. However, FNB has not yet shown diagnostic superiority over FNA. Considering all the technical aspects of FNA and FNB, the different types of needle currently available, comparisons in term of diagnostic yield, and the different techniques of sampling, a tailored approach should be used in order to determine the needle that is most appropriate for the different specific scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Benedetta Conti
- Digestive Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Cremona Hospital, Cremona, Cr 26100, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Cereatti
- Digestive Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Cremona Hospital, Cremona, Cr 26100, Italy
| | - Roberto Grassia
- Digestive Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Cremona Hospital, Cremona, Cr 26100, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Marshall C, Mounzer R, Hall M, Simon V, Centeno B, Dennis K, Dhillon J, Fan F, Khazai L, Klapman J, Komanduri S, Lin X, Lu D, Mehrotra S, Muthusamy VR, Nayar R, Paintal A, Rao J, Sams S, Shah J, Watson R, Rastogi A, Wani S. Suboptimal Agreement Among Cytopathologists in Diagnosis of Malignancy Based on Endoscopic Ultrasound Needle Aspirates of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Validation Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 16:1114-1122.e2. [PMID: 28911946 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2017] [Revised: 08/17/2017] [Accepted: 09/03/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Despite the widespread use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) to sample pancreatic lesions and the standardization of pancreaticobiliary cytopathologic nomenclature, there are few data on inter-observer agreement among cytopathologists evaluating pancreatic cytologic specimens obtained by EUS-FNA. We developed a scoring system to assess agreement among cytopathologists in overall diagnosis and quantitative and qualitative parameters, and evaluated factors associated with agreement. METHODS We performed a prospective study to validate results from our pilot study that demonstrated moderate to substantial inter-observer agreement among cytopathologists for the final cytologic diagnosis. In the first phase, 3 cytopathologists refined criteria for assessment of quantity and quality measures. During phase 2, EUS-FNA specimens of solid pancreatic lesions from 46 patients were evaluated by 11 cytopathologists at 5 tertiary care centers using a standardized scoring tool. Individual quantitative and qualitative measures were scored and an overall cytologic diagnosis was determined. Clinical and EUS parameters were assessed as predictors of unanimous agreement. Inter-observer agreement (IOA) was calculated using multi-rater kappa (κ) statistics and a logistic regression model was created to identify factors associated with unanimous agreement. RESULTS The IOA for final diagnoses, based on cytologic analysis, was moderate (κ = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.43-0.70). Kappa values did not increase when categories of suspicious for malignancy, malignant, and neoplasm were combined. IOA was slight to moderate for individual quantitative (κ = 0.007; 95% CI, -0.03 to -0.04) and qualitative parameters (κ = 0.5; 95% CI, 0.47-0.53). Jaundice was the only factor associated with agreement among all cytopathologists on multivariate analysis (odds ratio for unanimous agreement, 5.3; 95% CI, 1.1-26.89). CONCLUSIONS There is a suboptimal level of agreement among cytopathologists in the diagnosis of malignancy based on analysis of EUS-FNA specimens obtained from solid pancreatic masses. Strategies are needed to refine the cytologic criteria for diagnosis of malignancy and enhance tissue acquisition techniques to improve diagnostic reproducibility among cytopathologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie Marshall
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Rawad Mounzer
- Digestive Institute, Banner - University Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Matt Hall
- Children's Hospital Association, Overland Park, Kansas
| | - Violette Simon
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Barbara Centeno
- Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Katie Dennis
- Department of Pathology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas
| | | | - Fang Fan
- Department of Pathology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Laila Khazai
- Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Jason Klapman
- Gastrointestinal Tumor Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Srinadh Komanduri
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Xiaoqi Lin
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - David Lu
- Department of Pathology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Sanjana Mehrotra
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - V Raman Muthusamy
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Ritu Nayar
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ajit Paintal
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jianyu Rao
- Department of Pathology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Sharon Sams
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Janak Shah
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Rabindra Watson
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Amit Rastogi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mounzer R, Yen R, Marshall C, Sams S, Mehrotra S, Said MS, Obuch JC, Brauer B, Attwell A, Fukami N, Shah R, Amateau S, Hall M, Hosford L, Wilson R, Rastogi A, Wani S. Interobserver agreement among cytopathologists in the evaluation of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology specimens. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4:E812-9. [PMID: 27556103 PMCID: PMC4993880 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-108188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2015] [Accepted: 04/25/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has become the standard of care in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions. Limited data exist on interobserver agreement (IOA) among cytopathologists in assessing solid pancreatic EUS-FNA specimens. This study aimed to evaluate IOA among cytopathologists in assessing EUS-FNA cytology specimens of solid pancreatic lesions using a novel standardized scoring system and to assess individual clinical and cytologic predictors of IOA. METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic lesions at a tertiary care referral center were included. EUS-FNA slides were evaluated by four blinded cytopathologists using a standardized scoring system that assessed final cytologic diagnosis and quantitative (number of nucleated/diagnostic cells) and qualitative (bloodiness, inflammation/necrosis, contamination, artifact) cytologic parameters. Final clinical diagnosis was based on final cytology, surgical pathology, or 1-year clinical follow-up. IOA was calculated using multi-rater kappa (κ) statistics. Bivariate analyses were performed comparing cases with and without uniform agreement among the cytopathologists followed by logistic regression with backward elimination to model likelihood of uniform agreement. RESULTS Ninety-nine patients were included (49 % males, mean age 64 years, mean lesion size 26 mm). IOA for final diagnosis was moderate (κ = 0.45, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.4 - 0.49) with minimal improvement when combining suspicious and malignant diagnoses (κ = 0.54, 95 %CI 0.49 - 0.6). The weighted kappa value for overall diagnosis was 0.65 (95 %CI 0.54 - 0.76). IOA was slight to fair (κ = 0.04 - 0.32) for individual cytologic parameters. A final clinical diagnosis of malignancy was the most significant predictor of agreement [OR 3.99 (CI 1.52 - 10.49)]. CONCLUSIONS Interobserver agreement among cytopathologists for pancreatic EUS-FNA specimens is moderate-substantial for the final cytologic diagnosis. The final clinical diagnosis of malignancy was the strongest predictor of agreement. These results have significant implications for patient management and need to be validated in future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rawad Mounzer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Roy Yen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Carrie Marshall
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sharon Sams
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sanjana Mehrotra
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | - Joshua C. Obuch
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Brian Brauer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Augustin Attwell
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Norio Fukami
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Raj Shah
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Stuart Amateau
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Matthew Hall
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Lindsay Hosford
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Robert Wilson
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Amit Rastogi
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Kansas School of Medicine and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA,Corresponding author Sachin Wani, MD Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical CenterMail Stop F7351635 Aurora CourtRm 2.031AuroraCO 80045USA+1-720-848-2749
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yang Y, Li L, Qu C, Liang S, Zeng B, Luo Z. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle core biopsy for the diagnosis of pancreatic malignant lesions: a systematic review and Meta-Analysis. Sci Rep 2016; 6:22978. [PMID: 26960914 PMCID: PMC4785370 DOI: 10.1038/srep22978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2015] [Accepted: 02/24/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle core biopsy (EUS-FNB) has been used as an effective method of diagnosing pancreatic malignant lesions. It has the advantage of providing well preserved tissue for histologic grading and subsequent molecular biological analysis. In order to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNB for pancreatic malignant lesions, studies assessing EUS-FNB to diagnose solid pancreatic masses were selected via Medline. Sixteen articles published between 2005 and 2015, covering 828 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The summary estimates for EUS-FNB differentiating malignant from benign solid pancreatic masses were: sensitivity 0.84 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.82–0.87); specificity 0.98 (95% CI, 0.93–1.00); positive likelihood ratio 8.0 (95% CI 4.5–14.4); negative likelihood ratio 0.17 (95% CI 0.10–0.26); and DOR 64 (95% CI 30.4–134.8). The area under the sROC curve was 0.96. Subgroup analysis did not identify other factors that could substantially affect the diagnostic accuracy, such as the study design, location of study, number of centers, location of lesion, whether or not a cytopathologist was present, and so on. EUS-FNB is a reliable diagnostic tool for solid pancreatic masses and should be especially considered for pathology where histologic morphology is preferred for diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongtao Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The 306th Hospital of PLA, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Lianyong Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, The 306th Hospital of PLA, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Changmin Qu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The 306th Hospital of PLA, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Shuwen Liang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The 306th Hospital of PLA, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Bolun Zeng
- Department of Gastroenterology, The 306th Hospital of PLA, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Zhiwen Luo
- Department of Gastroenterology, The 306th Hospital of PLA, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Saieg MA, Munson V, Colletti S, Nassar A. The impact of the new proposed Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology terminology for pancreaticobiliary cytology in endoscopic US-FNA: A single-Institutional experience. Cancer Cytopathol 2015; 123:488-94. [DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2015] [Revised: 04/22/2015] [Accepted: 04/23/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mauro Ajaj Saieg
- Department of Pathology; Santa Casa Medical School; Sao Paulo Brazil
- Department of Pathology; Grupo Fleury Laboratories; Sao Paulo Brazil
| | - Valerie Munson
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology; Mayo Clinic; Jacksonville Florida
| | - Shanna Colletti
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology; Mayo Clinic; Jacksonville Florida
| | - Aziza Nassar
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology; Mayo Clinic; Jacksonville Florida
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Grieve K, Palazzo L, Dalimier E, Vielh P, Fabre M. A feasibility study of full-field optical coherence tomography for rapid evaluation of EUS-guided microbiopsy specimens. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81:342-50. [PMID: 25262102 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.06.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2014] [Accepted: 06/18/2014] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rapid on-site evaluation of cytologic specimens is a way of determining the adequacy of fine-needle aspiration (FNA). However, alternatives may be useful when the presence of a cytotechnologist and/or pathologist is not possible. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the feasibility of using full-field optical coherence tomography (FFOCT) for FNA specimen quality assessment. DESIGN FFOCT images were acquired on gastric, pancreatic, pelvic, and lymph-node formalin-fixed FNA specimens and were compared with histology of the same samples. SETTING Pathology suite in a hospital. PATIENTS Fourteen patients undergoing gastric, pancreatic, pelvic, or lymph-node EUS-guided FNA biopsy. INTERVENTIONS FFOCT imaging on formalin-fixed samples before histologic procedures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS FFOCT imaging feasibility and visibility of normal and abnormal features on images. RESULTS FFOCT imaging was possible. Blood, mucus, muscle, collagen, and digestive mucosa could be identified as well as abnormal architectural features including infiltrative pancreatic ductal carcinoma and a neuroendocrine neoplasm. Lesions at the individual cell level could not be detected. LIMITATIONS The study was performed on a limited number of cases. CONCLUSION FFOCT offers rapid, noninvasive, nondestructive imaging of FNA biopsy specimens. In the future, it could be performed in the endoscopy suite to improve detection of satisfactory specimens and obviate the need for rapid on-site evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Grieve
- Institut de la Vision, Centre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Philippe Vielh
- Department of Biology and Pathology, Translational Research Laboratory, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Monique Fabre
- Department of Biology and Pathology, Translational Research Laboratory, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
EUS-guided tissue acquisition: an evidence-based approach (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80:939-59.e7. [PMID: 25434654 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2014] [Accepted: 07/17/2014] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|