1
|
Monreal-Robles R, Jáquez-Quintana JO, Benavides-Salgado DE, González-González JA. Serrated polyps of the colon and rectum: a concise review. REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGÍA DE MÉXICO 2021; 86:276-286. [PMID: 34116964 DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmxen.2021.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
"Serrated polyps" is the term used for epithelial lesions of the colon and rectum that have a "sawtooth" pattern on the polyp's surface and crypt epithelium. The so-called serrated pathway describes the progression of sessile serrated adenomas and traditional serrated adenomas to colorectal cancer. Said pathway is well recognized as an alternative mechanism of carcinogenesis and accounts for 15-30% of the cases of colorectal cancer. It also explains a large number of the cases of interval colorectal cancer. Thus, due to their usually aggressive and uncertain behavior, serrated polyps are of the utmost importance in colorectal cancer screening. Our aim was to review the history, current nomenclature, pathophysiology, morphology, treatment, and surveillance of serrated polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Monreal-Robles
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Universitario Dr. José E. González, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico; Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico.
| | - J O Jáquez-Quintana
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Universitario Dr. José E. González, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
| | - D E Benavides-Salgado
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Universitario Dr. José E. González, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
| | - J A González-González
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Universitario Dr. José E. González, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Monahan KJ, Bradshaw N, Dolwani S, Desouza B, Dunlop MG, East JE, Ilyas M, Kaur A, Lalloo F, Latchford A, Rutter MD, Tomlinson I, Thomas HJW, Hill J. Guidelines for the management of hereditary colorectal cancer from the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG)/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI)/United Kingdom Cancer Genetics Group (UKCGG). Gut 2020; 69:411-444. [PMID: 31780574 PMCID: PMC7034349 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 232] [Impact Index Per Article: 58.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Revised: 10/25/2019] [Accepted: 11/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Heritable factors account for approximately 35% of colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, and almost 30% of the population in the UK have a family history of CRC. The quantification of an individual's lifetime risk of gastrointestinal cancer may incorporate clinical and molecular data, and depends on accurate phenotypic assessment and genetic diagnosis. In turn this may facilitate targeted risk-reducing interventions, including endoscopic surveillance, preventative surgery and chemoprophylaxis, which provide opportunities for cancer prevention. This guideline is an update from the 2010 British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (BSG/ACPGBI) guidelines for colorectal screening and surveillance in moderate and high-risk groups; however, this guideline is concerned specifically with people who have increased lifetime risk of CRC due to hereditary factors, including those with Lynch syndrome, polyposis or a family history of CRC. On this occasion we invited the UK Cancer Genetics Group (UKCGG), a subgroup within the British Society of Genetic Medicine (BSGM), as a partner to BSG and ACPGBI in the multidisciplinary guideline development process. We also invited external review through the Delphi process by members of the public as well as the steering committees of the European Hereditary Tumour Group (EHTG) and the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). A systematic review of 10 189 publications was undertaken to develop 67 evidence and expert opinion-based recommendations for the management of hereditary CRC risk. Ten research recommendations are also prioritised to inform clinical management of people at hereditary CRC risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin J Monahan
- Family Cancer Clinic, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
- Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Nicola Bradshaw
- Clinical Genetics, West of Scotland Genetics Services, Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Sunil Dolwani
- Gastroenterology, Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK
| | - Bianca Desouza
- Clinical Genetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - James E East
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mohammad Ilyas
- Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Nottingham University, Nottingham, UK
| | - Asha Kaur
- Head of Policy and Campaigns, Bowel Cancer UK, London, UK
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Genetic Medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Matthew D Rutter
- Gastroenterology, University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton-on-Tees, UK
- Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ian Tomlinson
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Birmingham, UK
- Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Huw J W Thomas
- Family Cancer Clinic, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
- Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - James Hill
- Genetic Medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sánchez-Montes C, García-Rodríguez A, Córdova H, Pellisé M, Fernández-Esparrach G. Advanced endoscopy technologies to improve the detection and characterisation of colorrectal polyps. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2019; 43:46-56. [PMID: 31813615 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2019.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2019] [Revised: 08/20/2019] [Accepted: 09/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is a major health problem. An improvement to its survival has been demonstrated by performing colonoscopy screenings and removing its precursor lesions: polyps. However, colonoscopy is not infallible and multiple strategies have been proposed aimed at improving the quality thereof. This report describes the endoscopic systems available to improve the detection and characterization of polyps, the different classifications for histological prediction and the current indications of advanced endoscopic diagnostic techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Sánchez-Montes
- Unidad de Endoscopia Digestiva, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Grupo de Investigación de Endoscopia Digestiva, IIS La Fe, Valencia, España
| | - Ana García-Rodríguez
- Unidad de Endoscopia, Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, España
| | - Henry Córdova
- Unidad de Endoscopia, Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, España
| | - María Pellisé
- Unidad de Endoscopia, Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, España
| | - Gloria Fernández-Esparrach
- Unidad de Endoscopia, Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, España.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Atkinson NSS, Ket S, Bassett P, Aponte D, De Aguiar S, Gupta N, Horimatsu T, Ikematsu H, Inoue T, Kaltenbach T, Leung WK, Matsuda T, Paggi S, Radaelli F, Rastogi A, Rex DK, Sabbagh LC, Saito Y, Sano Y, Saracco GM, Saunders BP, Senore C, Soetikno R, Vemulapalli KC, Jairath V, East JE. Narrow-Band Imaging for Detection of Neoplasia at Colonoscopy: A Meta-analysis of Data From Individual Patients in Randomized Controlled Trials. Gastroenterology 2019; 157:462-471. [PMID: 30998991 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2018] [Revised: 03/29/2019] [Accepted: 04/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is an important quality assurance measure for colonoscopy. Some studies suggest that narrow-band imaging (NBI) may be more effective at detecting adenomas than white-light endoscopy (WLE) when bowel preparation is optimal. We conducted a meta-analysis of data from individual patients in randomized controlled trials that compared the efficacy of NBI to WLE in detection of adenomas. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases through April 2017 for randomized controlled trials that assessed detection of colon polyps by high-definition WLE vs NBI and from which data on individual patients were available. The primary outcome measure was ADR adjusted for bowel preparation quality. Multilevel regression models were used with patients nested within trials, and trial included as a random effect. RESULTS We collected data from 11 trials, comprising 4491 patients and 6636 polyps detected. Adenomas were detected in 952 of 2251 (42.3%) participants examined by WLE vs 1011 of 2239 (45.2%) participants examined by NBI (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] for detection of adenoma by WLE vs NBI, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.01-1.29; P = .04). NBI outperformed WLE only when bowel preparation was best: adequate preparation OR, 1.07 (95% CI, 0.92-1.24; P = .38) vs best preparation OR, 1.30 (95% CI, 1.04-1.62; P = .02). Second-generation bright NBI had a better ADR than WLE (second-generation NBI OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.05-1.56; P = .02), whereas first-generation NBI did not. NBI detected more non-adenomatous polyps than WLE (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.06-1.44; P = .008) and flat polyps than WLE (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.02-1.51; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS In a meta-analysis of data from individual patients in randomized controlled trials, we found NBI to have a higher ADR than WLE, and that this effect is greater when bowel preparation is optimal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan S S Atkinson
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Waitemata District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Shara Ket
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Paul Bassett
- Statsconsultancy Ltd, Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK
| | - Diego Aponte
- Gastroenterology Department, Clínica Reina Sofía, Sanitas University Foundation, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Silvia De Aguiar
- General Practice Department, Clínica Reina Sofía, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Neil Gupta
- University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Takahiro Horimatsu
- Department of Therapeutic Oncology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Ikematsu
- Division of Science and Technology for Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takuya Inoue
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tonya Kaltenbach
- San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Wai Keung Leung
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Takahisa Matsuda
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Centre Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Silvia Paggi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy
| | | | - Amit Rastogi
- University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Luis C Sabbagh
- Gastroenterology Department, Clínica Reina Sofía, Sanitas University Foundation, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Yutaka Saito
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Centre Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasushi Sano
- Gastrointestinal Center and Institute of Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Care, Sano Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Giorgio M Saracco
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Brian P Saunders
- Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Carlo Senore
- Epidemiology and Screening Unit, Centro di Prevenzione Oncologica Piemonte, University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Roy Soetikno
- Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Krishna C Vemulapalli
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Vipul Jairath
- Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - James E East
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mir FA, Boumitri C, Ashraf I, Matteson-Kome ML, Nguyen DL, Puli SR, Bechtold ML. Cap-assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy: is the cap beneficial? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Gastroenterol 2017; 30:640-648. [PMID: 29118558 PMCID: PMC5670283 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2017.0180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2017] [Accepted: 06/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: In an effort to improve visualization during colonoscopy, a transparent plastic cap or hood may be placed on the end of the colonoscope. Cap-assisted colonoscopy (CAC) has been studied and is thought to improve polyp detection. Numerous studies have been conducted comparing pertinent clinical outcomes between CAC and standard colonoscopy (SC) with inconsistent results. Methods: Numerous databases were searched in November 2016. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adult subjects that compared CAC to SC were included. Outcomes of total colonoscopy time, time to cecum, cecal intubation rate, terminal ileum intubation rate, polyp detection rate (PDR), and adenoma detection rate (ADR) were analyzed in terms of odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with fixed effect and random effects models. Results: Five hundred eighty-nine articles and abstracts were discovered. Of these, 23 RCTs (n=12,947) were included in the analysis. CAC showed statistically significant superiority in total colonoscopy time (MD -1.51 min; 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.67 to -0.34; P<0.01) and time to cecum (MD -0.82 min; 95%CI -1.20 to -0.44; P<0.01) compared to SC. CAC also showed better PDR (OR 1.17; 95%CI 1.06-1.29; P<0.01) but not ADR (OR 1.11; 95%CI 0.95-1.30; P=0.20). In contrast, on sensitivity analysis, ADR was better with CAC. Terminal ileum intubation and cecal intubation rates demonstrated no significant difference between the two groups (P=0.11 and P=0.73, respectively). Conclusions: The use of a transparent cap during colonoscopy improves PDR while reducing procedure times. ADR may improve in cap-assisted colonoscopy but further studies are required to confirm this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fazia A Mir
- Department of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia (Fazia A. Mir, Christine Boumitri, Imran Ashraf, Michelle L. Matteson-Kome, Matthew L. Bechtold), USA
| | - Christine Boumitri
- Department of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia (Fazia A. Mir, Christine Boumitri, Imran Ashraf, Michelle L. Matteson-Kome, Matthew L. Bechtold), USA
| | - Imran Ashraf
- Department of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia (Fazia A. Mir, Christine Boumitri, Imran Ashraf, Michelle L. Matteson-Kome, Matthew L. Bechtold), USA
| | - Michelle L Matteson-Kome
- Department of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia (Fazia A. Mir, Christine Boumitri, Imran Ashraf, Michelle L. Matteson-Kome, Matthew L. Bechtold), USA
| | - Douglas L Nguyen
- Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine (Douglas L. Nguyen), USA
| | - Srinivas R Puli
- Department of Medicine, University of Illinois, Peoria (Srinivas R. Puli), USA
| | - Matthew L Bechtold
- Department of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia (Fazia A. Mir, Christine Boumitri, Imran Ashraf, Michelle L. Matteson-Kome, Matthew L. Bechtold), USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
East JE, Atkin WS, Bateman AC, Clark SK, Dolwani S, Ket SN, Leedham SJ, Phull PS, Rutter MD, Shepherd NA, Tomlinson I, Rees CJ. British Society of Gastroenterology position statement on serrated polyps in the colon and rectum. Gut 2017; 66:1181-1196. [PMID: 28450390 PMCID: PMC5530473 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 183] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2017] [Revised: 03/31/2017] [Accepted: 04/03/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Serrated polyps have been recognised in the last decade as important premalignant lesions accounting for between 15% and 30% of colorectal cancers. There is therefore a clinical need for guidance on how to manage these lesions; however, the evidence base is limited. A working group was commission by the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) Endoscopy section to review the available evidence and develop a position statement to provide clinical guidance until the evidence becomes available to support a formal guideline. The scope of the position statement was wide-ranging and included: evidence that serrated lesions have premalignant potential; detection and resection of serrated lesions; surveillance strategies after detection of serrated lesions; special situations-serrated polyposis syndrome (including surgery) and serrated lesions in colitis; education, audit and benchmarks and research questions. Statements on these issues were proposed where the evidence was deemed sufficient, and re-evaluated modified via a Delphi process until >80% agreement was reached. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) tool was used to assess the strength of evidence and strength of recommendation for finalised statements. Key recommendation: we suggest that until further evidence on the efficacy or otherwise of surveillance are published, patients with sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) that appear associated with a higher risk of future neoplasia or colorectal cancer (SSLs ≥10 mm or serrated lesions harbouring dysplasia including traditional serrated adenomas) should be offered a one-off colonoscopic surveillance examination at 3 years (weak recommendation, low quality evidence, 90% agreement).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James E East
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Wendy S Atkin
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Adrian C Bateman
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Susan K Clark
- The Polyposis Registry, St. Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Sunil Dolwani
- Cancer Screening, Prevention and Early Diagnosis Group, Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Shara N Ket
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Simon J Leedham
- Gastrointestinal Stem-cell Biology Laboratory, Oxford Centre for Cancer Gene Research, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Perminder S Phull
- Department of Digestive Disorders, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Matt D Rutter
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton-on-Tees, Cleveland, UK
- School of Medicine, Durham University, Durham, UK
| | - Neil A Shepherd
- Gloucestershire Cellular Pathology Laboratory, Cheltenham General Hospital, Cheltenham, UK
| | - Ian Tomlinson
- Oxford Centre for Cancer Gene Research, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Colin J Rees
- School of Medicine, Durham University, Durham, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, South Tyneside NHS Foundation Trust, South Shields, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lahiff C, East JE. Endoscopic approach to polyp recognition. Frontline Gastroenterol 2017; 8:98-103. [PMID: 28839893 PMCID: PMC5369434 DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2016-100777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2016] [Accepted: 12/11/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Identification and complete resection of colorectal polyps provide a significant mortality benefit from colorectal cancer. With improvements in colonoscopic techniques and advanced endoscopic imaging techniques, polyp detection has taken on greater complexity since the establishment of bowel cancer screening programmes internationally. All endoscopists operating within symptomatic and screening populations should be aware of endoscopic features associated with advanced neoplasia. Chromoendoscopy and advanced imaging techniques, such as narrow spectrum technologies (narrow band imaging, flexible spectral imaging colour enhancement (FICE) and i-Scan digital contrast (iSCAN)), have specific classification systems to support accurate lesion characterisation. This review summarises the evidence in relation to polyp detection, recognition and characterisation as well as the identification of features of invasion. Future areas of interest include optimal management of large polyps, incorporation of a 'detect, resect and discard' strategy for small and diminutive polyps, expected wider use of computer decision support tools (artificial intelligence and deep learning) and the use of fluorescently labelled molecular probes to improve detection and assessment of neoplasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conor Lahiff
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - James E East
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Floer M, Meister T. Endoscopic Improvement of the Adenoma Detection Rate during Colonoscopy - Where Do We Stand in 2015? Digestion 2017; 93:202-13. [PMID: 26986225 DOI: 10.1159/000442464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2015] [Accepted: 11/14/2015] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The presence of colorectal adenomas is considered a major risk factor for colorectal cancer development. The implementation of screening colonoscopy programs in the Western world has led to a substantial reduction of colorectal cancer death. Many efforts have been made to reduce the adenoma miss rates by the application of new endoscopic devices and techniques for better adenoma visualization. SUMMARY This special review gives the readership an overview of current endoscopic innovations that can aid in the increase of the adenoma detection rate (ADR) during colonoscopy. These innovations include the use of devices like EndoCuff® and EndoRings® as well as new technical equipment like third-eye endoscope® and full-spectrum endoscopy (FUSE®). KEY MESSAGE Technical improvements and newly developed accessories are able to improve the ADR. However, additional costs and a willingness to invest into potentially expensive equipment might be necessary. Investigator-dependent skills remain the backbone in the ADR detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Floer
- Department of Gastroenterology, HELIOS Albert-Schweitzer-Hospital Northeim, Northeim, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rodríguez-García JL, Carmona-Sánchez R, Rosas-Vitorino C. Usefulness of oil lubrication during colonoscopy: A comparative study with the conventional technique. REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGÍA DE MÉXICO 2016; 81:28-34. [PMID: 26780984 DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmx.2015.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2015] [Accepted: 12/02/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The different forms of lubrication are among the most simple, accessible, and economic techniques that have been implemented for improving the diagnostic performance of colonoscopy. AIM To determine whether the use of oil improved the number of complete colonoscopies, facilitated the procedure, reduced pain, or improved the study's diagnostic performance, compared with the conventional lubrication technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred and seventy-five patients referred for colonoscopy were alternately allocated to receive treatment with the standard lubrication method with chlorhexidine gel (group 1) or lubrication with corn oil administered through the working channel (group II). The number of complete colonoscopies, the length of time needed to reach the cecum, the degree of difficulty estimated by the endoscopist and the assistant, the level of pain at the end of the study estimated by the patient, and the endoscopic findings were all determined. RESULTS Eighty-eight patients made up group I and 87 made up group II. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in relation to general characteristics, the number of complete colonoscopies (93 vs. 97%, respectively), the time needed to reach the cecum (8:00 vs. 8:41min, respectively), the level of pain at the end of the study, or the detection of polyps. The degree of difficulty was slightly lower in group II, but with no statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS Lubrication with oil during colonoscopy did not improve the number of complete colonoscopies, did not facilitate the study, nor did it reduce pain or increase the diagnostic performance of the study, when compared with the conventional technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - C Rosas-Vitorino
- Departamento de Enfermería, Hospital Ángeles-CMP, San Luis Potosí, México
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rodríguez-García J, Carmona-Sánchez R, Rosas-Vitorino C. Usefulness of oil lubrication during colonoscopy: A comparative study with the conventional technique. REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGÍA DE MÉXICO (ENGLISH EDITION) 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmxen.2015.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|