[Management of preterm premature rupture of membranes (except for antibiotherapy): CNGOF preterm premature rupture of membranes guidelines]

Prediction and prevention of preterm birth: Quality assessment and systematic review of clinical practice guidelines using the AGREE II framework

BACKGROUND

Prediction of pregnancies at risk of preterm birth (PTB) may allow targeted prevention strategies.

OBJECTIVES

To assess quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and identify areas of agreement and contention in prediction and prevention of spontaneous PTB.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched for CPGs regarding PTB prediction and prevention in asymptomatic singleton pregnancies without language restriction in January 2024.

SELECTION CRITERIA

CPGs included were published between July 2017 and December 2023 and contained statements intended to direct clinical practice.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

CPG quality was assessed using the AGREE-II tool. Recommendations were extracted and grouped under domains of prediction and prevention, in general populations and high-risk groups.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 37 CPGs from 20 organizations; all were of moderate or high quality overall. There was consensus in prediction of PTB by identification of risk factors and cervical length screening in high-risk pregnancies and prevention of PTB by universal screening and treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria, screening and treatment for BV in high-risk pregnancies, and use of preventative progesterone and cerclage. Areas of contention or limited consensus were the role of PTB clinics, universal cervical length measurement, biomarkers and cervical pessaries.

CONCLUSIONS

This review identified strengths and limitations of current PTB CPGs, and areas for future research.

Infectious morbidity of speculum versus digital examinations in preterm prelabor rupture of membranes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the effect of speculum examination only versus digital cervical examination on maternal infectious morbidity in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We explored MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies comparing the rate of a composite maternal infectious morbidity (either chorioamnionitis, endometritis or both) in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes that underwent a speculum only versus digital cervical examination at the time of diagnosis. Two reviewers separately ascertained studies, obtained data, and gauged study quality. The rate of a composite maternal infectious morbidity (either chorioamnionitis, endometritis or both) were compared and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated.

RESULTS

Four cohort studies, reporting on 1213 women were identified. The median point prevalence of the composite maternal infectious morbidity was 26% (interquartile range 15-35%) in women who had a speculum examination only compared to 33% (interquartile range 22-42%) in women who underwent a digital examination. The overall maternal composite infectious morbidity rate in women that had a speculum examination only was less compared to women that had undergone a digital examination (pooled OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58-0.98, I² 17%). The weighted mean length of latency in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes was longer in individuals evaluated by speculum only versus digital examination, 6.6 d versus 2.9 d (mean difference 4.5 d, 95% CI 1.4 to 7.8, I² 99%).

CONCLUSION

Speculum examination only in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes is associated with less maternal infectious morbidity and longer latency periods.

[Epidemiology, risk factors and child prognosis: CNGOF Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes Guidelines]

OBJECTIVES

To synthetize the available evidence regarding the incidence and risk factors of preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). To describe the evolution of pregnancy, neonatal outcomes and the prognosis of infants born in a context of PPROM, according to the existence of an associated intrauterine infection and to the latency duration.

METHOD

Consultation of the Medline database, from 1980 to February 2018.

RESULTS

PPROM before 37 and before 34 weeks' gestation occur in 2-3% and <1% of pregnancies, respectively (LE2). Although many risk factors are identified, few are modifiable, and the vast majority of patients have no risk factors (LE2). Consequently, individual prediction of the risk of PPROM and primary prevention measures have not been shown to be effective and are not recommended in clinical practice (Grade B). Most women give birth within the week following PPROM (LE2). The main complications of PPROM are prematurity, intrauterine infection and obstetric and maternal complications (LE2). Latency duration and the frequency of complications decrease with increasing gestational age at PPROM (LE2). Neonatal prognosis is largely conditioned by gestational age at birth, with no apparent over-risk of poor outcomes linked to PPROM compared to other causes of preterm birth (LE2). In contrast, intrauterine infection is associated with an increased risk of in utero fetal death (LE3), necrotizing enterocolitis (LE1) and early-onset sepsis (LE2). The association of intrauterine infection with neurological morbidity remains controversial. Prolongation of latency, from gestational age at PPROM, is beneficial for the child (LE2).

CONCLUSION

PPROM is a major cause of prematurity and short- and long-term mortality and morbidity. Antenatal care is an important issue for obstetric and pediatric teams, aiming to reduce complications and adverse consequences for both mother and child.