Dermatomyositis - key to diagnosing ovarian cancer, monitoring treatment and detecting recurrent disease: Case report

Research progress on the dermatomyositis specific autoantibodies and malignancy associated dermatomyositis

Dermatomyositis (DM) is an autoimmune disease often complicated with malignant tumors. More than 50% of DM patients have myositis specific autoantibodies in their bodies. DM specific autoantibodies [including anti-migration inhibitory factor (Mi)-2 antibody, anti-nuclear matrix protein (NXP)-2 antibody, anti-transcription intermediary factor (TIF) 1-γ antibody, and anti-small ubiquitin like modifier activating enzyme (SAE) antibody] play important roles in the pathogenesis of malignancy associated DM. Revealing the role of DM specific autoantibodies in the development of malignant tumors in DM patients can provide important evidence for accurately assessing the risk of developing malignant tumors in DM patients, and also provide new ideas for clinical diagnosis of DM and precise treatment.

Thigh Muscle MRI Edema Features of Dermatomyositis Patients With Ovarian Cancer: A Report of Three Cases

Dermatomyositis (DM) is a rare inflammatory disease with systemic manifestations, including internal malignancy. Ovarian cancer is one of the most commonly found tumor types in DM patients. To date, no study has analyzed the MRI signals of dermatomyositis patients with cancer. Thus, in this report, we describe three cases in which we found ovarian cancer after the diagnosis of DM and observed a symmetrical honeycomb pattern edema signal distributed to the peripheral area of vastus laterals while adductors and posterior thigh compartments were relatively spared. Our report has important implications for clinicians to identify patients with dermatomyositis at potential ovarian cancer risk.

The Role of Myositis-Specific Autoantibodies in the Dermatomyositis Spectrum

Dermatomyositis (DM) is a systemic autoimmune disease that affects skeletal muscles, the skin, and the lungs. It is characterized by autoantibodies, tissue inflammation, parenchymal cell damage, death, and vasculopathy. In terms of epidemiology, DM affects both children and adults. The current pathophysiology of DM is described as an autoimmune attack on the afflicted organs driven by environmental variables such as UV exposure, medications, infections, and lifestyle choices in genetically predisposed people. DM is also a paraneoplastic condition, which means that cancer may arise before, along with, or following the development of the symptoms of DM. Myositis-specific autoantibodies are associated with phenotypical features and are used for sub-classification of dermatomyositis patients. Because the risk of interstitial lung disease (ILD), internal malignancy, destructive disease trajectory, and maybe a response to medication differs by DM myositis-specific antibody (MSA) group, a better knowledge of MSAs and the validation and standardization of tests employed for detection is crucial for improving diagnosis and treatment. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of tests for various MSAs are not ideal, just like with any other test. However, more antibody tests are anticipated to make their way into formal schemata for diagnosis and actionable risk assessment in DM due to worldwide standardization and more extensive research. In this review, we outline crucial aspects for interpreting clinical and pathologic relationships with MSA in DM and critical knowledge and practice gaps that will optimize the clinical benefit and utility of MSAs as diagnostic and prognostic markers.

Dermatomyositis and/or polymyositis as a paraneoplastic manifestation of ovarian cancer: a systematic review

Dermatomyositis (DM) is defined as an autoimmune inflammatory disease that affects the skin, the blood vessels and the muscles. It typically presents with erythema affecting mostly the eyes and the hands as well as proximal muscle weakness. It has been also correlated with various types of cancer, including ovarian cancer. A systematic PubMed and Scopus search was conducted. A total of 110 women were included in our review. The median age of the patients was 52.5 years (8-85). The most frequent histological type of malignancy was epithelial (87 cases, 79.1%) and in only one patient (0.9%) DM was co-existing with a cancer recurrence. A clinical diagnosis of DM or PM preceded the diagnosis of ovarian cancer in 69.1% (76/110), while paraneoplastic DM after the diagnosis of ovarian cancer was reported in 31% (34/110). Serum antibodies were present in 22.5% (25/110) and the median creatine kinase during first evaluation was 886 (56.6-16,596). Postoperative improvement of the symptoms was observed in 24.6% (27/110) while also 24.6% (27/110) needed post-treatment rheumatological management. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy was necessary in 58.2% (64/110) and a cancer recurrence was identified in 28.2% (31/110), with a median follow up of 24.5 months (5-210). Finally, 52 (47.3%) deaths were reported in a median follow-up period of 16 months (0-210). It is crucial that DM patients should receive a thorough evaluation for ovarian cancer, among other malignancies, encompassing an abdominal CT or MRI scan and serum Ca-125 marker measurements. Treatment of ovarian cancer is usually accompanied by remission of DM symptoms in most of the cases.

Rapid development and use of patient-specific ctDNA biomarkers to avoid a "rash decision" in an ovarian cancer patient

Epithelial ovarian cancer (OvCa) is the most lethal female reproductive tract malignancy. A major clinical hurdle in patient management and treatment is that when using current surveillance technologies 80% of patients will be clinically diagnosed as having had a complete clinical response to primary therapy. In fact, the majority of women nonetheless develop disease recurrence within 18 mo. Thus, without more accurate surveillance protocols, the diagnostic question regarding OvCa recurrence remains framed as "when" rather than "if." With this background, we describe the case of a 61-yr-old female who presented with a 3-mo history of unexplained whole-body rash, which unexpectedly led to a diagnosis of and her treatment for OvCa. The rash resolved immediately following debulking surgery. Nearly 1 yr later, however, the rash reappeared, prompting the prospect of tumor recurrence and requirement for additional chemotherapy. To investigate this possibility, we undertook a genomics-based tumor surveillance approach using a targeted 56-gene NGS panel and biobanked tumor samples to develop personalized ctDNA biomarkers. Although tumor-specific TP53 and PTEN mutations were detectable in all originally collected tumor samples, pelvic washes, and blood samples, they were not detectable in any biosample collected beyond the first month of treatment. No additional chemotherapy was given. The rash spontaneously resolved. Now, 2 yr beyond the patient's original surgery, and in the face of continued negative ctDNA findings, the patient remains with no evidence of disease. As this single case report suggests, we believe for the first time that ctDNA can provide an additional layer of information to avoid overtreatment.

Effect of dexmedetomidine anesthesia on perioperative levels of TNF-α and IL-6 in patients with ovarian cancer

Effect of continuous use of dexmedetomidine during general anesthesia on perioperative levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in patients undergoing radical resection of ovarian cancer was investigated. The initial treatment of ovarian cancer is mainly radical surgery. Most patients with ovarian cancer radical surgery can achieve good results, but the use of improper anesthetic drugs in radical surgery can easily lead to unstable patient vital signs. Therefore, the selection of appropriate anesthetic drugs has become the key to radical ovarian cancer surgery. There are few reports on the use of dexmedetomidine in anesthesia for ovarian cancer radical surgery. This study was performed to retrospectively analyze the case data of patients undergoing laparoscopic ovarian cancer radical surgery, and to compare the hemodynamics of dexmedetomidine anesthesia with midazolam anesthesia and the concentrations of TNF-α and IL-6, to provide reference for clinical implementation of ovarian cancer radical surgery. The hemodynamics of patients in the dexmedetomidine group were stable compared with the midazolam group. Serum TNF-α and IL-6 levels were significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group than that in the midazolam group. If dexmedetomidine were continuously used during general anesthesia, the perioperative serum levels of TNF-α and IL-6 could be effectively reduced in patients undergoing radical resection of ovarian cancer, and the perioperative stress response was suppressed.