1
|
Jack S, Andritsch E, Joaquim A, Kreissl M, Locati L, Netea-Maier R, Reverter J, Elisei R. Current landscape and support for practical initiation of oncological prehabilitation translatable to thyroid cancer: A position paper. Heliyon 2024; 10:e30723. [PMID: 38813200 PMCID: PMC11133508 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Despite a growing body of evidence for the effectiveness of prehabilitation, the uptake of prehabilitation in Europe remains low. Contributing factors range from limited awareness and understanding of prehabilitation to a lack of supporting infrastructure and reimbursement challenges. In this position paper, the authors propose a new comprehensive definition of prehabilitation and identify differentiated thyroid cancer as a type of cancer particularly well-suited for prehabilitation. To support clinicians with the implementation of prehabilitation programs in their clinics, the authors discuss the following practical solutions: a) find the most appropriate prehabilitation program for each patient; b) raise awareness among peers; c) develop evidence to demonstrate the effectiveness of prehabilitation; d) expand the interdisciplinary team; e) expand your network and make use of existing assets; f) utilize learnings from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Jack
- Clinical Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
| | - E. Andritsch
- Clinical Department of Oncology, University Medical Centre of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerpl. 2, 8036, Graz, Austria
| | - A. Joaquim
- ONCOMOVE®, Associação de Investigação de Cuidados de Suporte em Oncologia (AICSO), 4410-406, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
| | - M.C. Kreissl
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Otto von Guericke University, Universitatsplätz 2, 39106, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - L. Locati
- Department of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pavia, S. da Nuova, 65, 27100, Pavia, PV, Italy
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS ICS, Maugeri, Via Salvatore Maugeri, 10, 27100 Pavia PV, Italy
| | - R.T. Netea-Maier
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 28, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - J.L. Reverter
- Endocrinology and Nutrition Department, Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Placa Civica, 08193, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - R. Elisei
- Endocrine Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Lungarno Antonio Pacinotti, 43, 56126, Pisa, PI, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shen C, Gu L, Li N, Wang R, Yang X, Chu Z. Attitudes and perceptions of cancer patients and healthcare providers towards prehabilitation: A thematic synthesis. Br J Health Psychol 2024; 29:395-429. [PMID: 37985361 DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prehabilitation, which is the process of enhancing functional capacity before undergoing surgery or other treatments, has been shown to improve cancer patients' outcomes. Patient and healthcare provider attitudes and perceptions are essential factors in the successful implementation of prehabilitation. The purpose of this systematic review is to synthesize qualitative evidence and explore the barriers and facilitators to prehabilitation implementation. METHODS From the earliest available date to October 2023, 7 databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE) were searched for a systematic review. Data were extracted, thematically analysed, and mapped onto the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Model of Behaviour (COM-B). The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool was used to assess the quality of the studies. RESULTS A total of 26 studies were included, involving 377 patients, 51 caregivers, and 156 healthcare providers. 16 factors were identified and mapped onto the COM-B model: reflective/automatic motivation, physical/social opportunity, physical/ psychological capability. CONCLUSIONS Patients and healthcare provides identified a lack of reflective motivation and physical opportunities as the most significant barriers to engagement in prehabilitation. Personalized approaches, social support, and healthcare providers' engagement are key factors for prehabilitation. Future research should focus on developing effective interventions to enhance the uptake and sustainability of prehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Shen
- School of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Lianqi Gu
- School of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Na Li
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Rao Wang
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xin Yang
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zhiping Chu
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fuchs TI, Pfab C, Kiselev J, Schaller SJ, Spies C, Rombey T. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of prehabilitation for elderly frail patients prior to elective surgery: a qualitative study with healthcare professionals. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:536. [PMID: 38671446 PMCID: PMC11046874 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10993-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prehabilitation aims to enhance functional capacity before surgery, minimise complications and achieve a better postoperative outcome. This can be particularly useful for older, frail patients to better tolerate surgery. The aim of this study was to identify what barriers and facilitators healthcare professionals in Germany experienced in the implementation and delivery of the multimodal prehabilitation programme "PRAEP-GO" for (pre-)frail adults aged 70 years and older to inform the implementation of prehabilitation into standard care. METHODS A nested descriptive qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured face-to-face interviews with healthcare professionals involved in the PRAEP-GO trial from the Berlin and Brandenburg region in Germany. Transcripts were analysed using Kuckartz' qualitative content analysis. Results were interpreted and synthesised using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, a theoretical framework to allow their application to a more general context. RESULTS A total of 14 interviews were conducted. Seven therapists (physio-, ergo-, sports therapy), five physicians and two employees from other professions with mainly administrative and organisational tasks in the project. All identified barriers and facilitating factors could be assigned to the themes of organisation, prehabilitation, cooperation and communication between healthcare professionals and with patients. Much optimisation potential was found regarding organisational aspects, e.g. addressing perceived staff shortages and optimising the patient pathway. Furthermore, it became apparent that communication and cooperation between professionals but also with patients need to be improved. More evidence regarding prehabilitation should be provided to convince professionals more. Prehabilitation should be multimodal and individualised, including the programme duration. Officially introducing prehabilitation into standard care would facilitate its delivery. DISCUSSION These findings underscore the fact that successful implementation of prehabilitation programmes, such as PRAEP-GO, requires sufficient organisational infrastructure, human resources, access to knowledge, an adaptable and individualised programme design as well as good communication among professionals and with patients. The transferability of the findings is limited by the absence of nutritionists and resulting overrepresentation of other therapists in the sample. To further convince professionals and patients of the concept of prehabilitation, more research is needed to build a solid evidence base that will ensure greater awareness and, thus, more motivation and cooperation among professionals and patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION Open Science Framework (osf.io/ksfgj).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamina Isabel Fuchs
- Berlin School of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carina Pfab
- Berlin School of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Nöldnerstraße 40-42, 10317, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jörn Kiselev
- Department for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Department for Health Sciences, Hochschule Fulda University of Applied Sciences, Fulda, Germany
| | - Stefan J Schaller
- Department for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str.22, 81675, München, Germany
| | - Claudia Spies
- Department for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tanja Rombey
- Department of Health Care Management, Technische Universität Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van der Velde M, van der Leeden M, Geleijn E, Veenhof C, Valkenet K. What moves patients to participate in prehabilitation before major surgery? A mixed methods systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2023; 20:75. [PMID: 37344902 DOI: 10.1186/s12966-023-01474-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prehabilitation offers patients the opportunity to actively participate in their perioperative care by preparing themselves for their upcoming surgery. Experiencing barriers may lead to non-participation, which can result in a reduced functional capacity, delayed post-operative recovery and higher healthcare costs. Insight in the barriers and facilitators to participation in prehabilitation can inform further development and implementation of prehabilitation. The aim of this review was to identify patient-experienced barriers and facilitators for participation in prehabilitation. METHODS For this mixed methods systematic review, articles were searched in PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they contained data on patient-reported barriers and facilitators to participation in prehabilitation in adults undergoing major surgery. Following database search, and title and abstract screening, full text articles were screened for eligibility and quality was assessed using the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool. Relevant data from the included studies were extracted, coded and categorized into themes, using an inductive approach. Based on these themes, the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour (COM-B) model was chosen to classify the identified themes. RESULTS Three quantitative, 14 qualitative and 6 mixed methods studies, published between 2007 and 2022, were included in this review. A multitude of factors were identified across the different COM-B components. Barriers included lack of knowledge of the benefits of prehabilitation and not prioritizing prehabilitation over other commitments (psychological capability), physical symptoms and comorbidities (physical capability), lack of time and limited financial capacity (physical opportunity), lack of social support (social opportunity), anxiety and stress (automatic motivation) and previous experiences and feeling too fit for prehabilitation (reflective motivation). Facilitators included knowledge of the benefits of prehabilitation (psychological capability), having access to resources (physical opportunity), social support and encouragement by a health care professional (social support), feeling a sense of control (automatic motivation) and beliefs in own abilities (reflective motivation). CONCLUSIONS A large number of barriers and facilitators, influencing participation in prehabilitation, were found across all six COM-B components. To reach all patients and to tailor prehabilitation to the patient's needs and preferences, it is important to take into account patients' capability, opportunity and motivation. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021250273) on May 18th, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam van der Velde
- Research Group Innovation of Human Movement Care, Research Center for Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, NL, Netherlands.
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sports, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, NL, Netherlands.
| | - Marike van der Leeden
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NL, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NL, Netherlands
| | - Edwin Geleijn
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NL, Netherlands
| | - Cindy Veenhof
- Research Group Innovation of Human Movement Care, Research Center for Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, NL, Netherlands
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sports, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, NL, Netherlands
| | - Karin Valkenet
- Research Group Innovation of Human Movement Care, Research Center for Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, NL, Netherlands
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sports, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, NL, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cao A, Cartmel B, Li FY, Gottlieb LT, Harrigan M, Ligibel JA, Gogoi R, Schwartz PE, Irwin ML, Ferrucci LM. Exercise adherence in a randomized controlled trial of exercise on quality of life in ovarian cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 2023; 17:535-543. [PMID: 36550261 PMCID: PMC10038915 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-022-01325-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Factors associated with improving exercise in ovarian cancer survivors remain unknown. We explored characteristics associated with exercise adherence among women treated for ovarian cancer in the Women's Activity and Lifestyle Study in Connecticut (WALC) randomized controlled trial. METHODS We evaluated adherence among women randomized to the WALC exercise intervention (N = 74). Women had to be exercising ≤ 90 min/week and post-treatment. The intervention included 25 telephone-based exercise counseling sessions over 6 months. Adherence was defined as 150 min/week of moderate/vigorous-intensity exercise. We evaluated factors associated with exercise adherence and duration using multivariate logistic and linear regression. The number of sessions sufficient to achieve 150 min/week was modeled with an unadjusted receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS Women were 57.3 ± 8.8 years old and 1.7 ± 1.0 years since diagnosis. The mean exercise time over 6 months was 166.0 ± 66.1 min/week, and 64.9% of women met the 150 min/week goal. Women attended 22.8 ± 3.6 (92%) counseling sessions. No cancer recurrence during the study (OR = 9.15, 95% CI: 1.09-44.02) and greater session attendance (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.02-1.43) were related to meeting the exercise goal. Greater session attendance (P < 0.01) and higher baseline activity level (P = 0.02) were associated with greater average weekly exercise duration. The ROC curve suggested attending 18 counseling sessions was optimal to meet the exercise goal. CONCLUSIONS Women attending more counseling sessions or with no cancer recurrence during the study were more likely to meet the exercise goal. More research is needed to understand ideal counseling intensity for ovarian cancer survivors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Eighteen counseling sessions are sufficient for ovarian cancer survivors to achieve 150 min/week exercise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anlan Cao
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT, 06520-8034, USA.
| | - Brenda Cartmel
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT, 06520-8034, USA
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Fang-Yong Li
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT, 06520-8034, USA
| | - Linda T Gottlieb
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT, 06520-8034, USA
| | - Maura Harrigan
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT, 06520-8034, USA
| | | | | | | | - Melinda L Irwin
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT, 06520-8034, USA
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Leah M Ferrucci
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT, 06520-8034, USA
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Saggu RK, Barlow P, Butler J, Ghaem-Maghami S, Hughes C, Lagergren P, McGregor AH, Shaw C, Wells M. Considerations for multimodal prehabilitation in women with gynaecological cancers: a scoping review using realist principles. BMC Womens Health 2022; 22:300. [PMID: 35854346 PMCID: PMC9294794 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-022-01882-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is increasing recognition that prehabilitation is important as a means of preparing patients physically and psychologically for cancer treatment. However, little is understood about the role and optimal nature of prehabilitation for gynaecological cancer patients, who usually face extensive and life-changing surgery in addition to other treatments that impact significantly on physiological and psychosexual wellbeing.
Review question This scoping review was conducted to collate the research evidence on multimodal prehabilitation in gynaecological cancers and the related barriers and facilitators to engagement and delivery that should be considered when designing a prehabilitation intervention for this group of women.
Methods Seven medical databases and four grey literature repositories were searched from database inception to September 2021. All articles, reporting on multimodal prehabilitation in gynaecological cancers were included in the final review, whether qualitative, quantitative or mixed-methods. Qualitative studies on unimodal interventions were also included, as these were thought to be more likely to include information about barriers and facilitators which could also be relevant to multimodal interventions. A realist framework of context, mechanism and outcome was used to assist interpretation of findings.
Results In total, 24 studies were included in the final review. The studies included the following tumour groups: ovarian only (n = 12), endometrial only (n = 1), mixed ovarian, endometrial, vulvar (n = 5) and non-specific gynaecological tumours (n = 6). There was considerable variation across studies in terms of screening for prehabilitation, delivery of prehabilitation and outcome measures. Key mechanisms and contexts influencing engagement with prehabilitation can be summarised as: (1) The role of healthcare professionals and organisations (2) Patients’ perceptions of acceptability (3) Factors influencing patient motivation (4) Prehabilitation as a priority (5) Access to prehabilitation. Implications for practice A standardised and well evidenced prehabilitation programme for women with gynaecological cancer does not yet exist. Healthcare organisations and researchers should take into account the enablers and barriers to effective engagement by healthcare professionals and by patients, when designing and evaluating prehabilitation for gynaecological cancer patients. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-022-01882-z.
Collapse
|
7
|
Communicating is analogous to caring: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of the patient-clinician communication experiences of individuals with ovarian cancer. Palliat Support Care 2022; 21:515-533. [PMID: 35582975 DOI: 10.1017/s1478951522000621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically review and synthesize the patient-clinician communication experiences of individuals with ovarian cancer. METHODS The CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases were reviewed for articles that described (a) original qualitative or mixed methods research, (b) the experiences of individuals with ovarian cancer, and (c) findings related to patient-clinician communication. Relevant data were extracted from study results sections, then coded for descriptive and analytical themes in accordance with Thomas and Harden's approach to thematic synthesis. Data were coded by two authors and discrepancies were resolved through discussion. RESULTS Of 1,390 unique articles, 65 met criteria for inclusion. Four descriptive themes captured participants' experiences communicating with clinicians: respecting me, seeing me, supporting me, and advocating for myself. Findings were synthesized into three analytical themes: communication is analogous to caring, communication is essential to personalized care, and communication may mitigate or exacerbate the burden of illness. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS Patient-clinician communication is a process by which individuals with ovarian cancer may engage in self-advocacy and appraise the extent to which they are seen, respected, and supported by clinicians. Strategies to enhance patient-clinician communication in the ovarian cancer care setting may promote patient perceptions of patient-centered care.
Collapse
|
8
|
Olaparib for ovarian cancer: a single-institution, multi-site qualitative study. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:4807-4812. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-06879-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
9
|
van der Zanden V, van der Zaag-Loonen HJ, Paarlberg KM, Meijer WJ, Mourits MJE, van Munster BC. PREsurgery thoughts - thoughts on prehabilitation in oncologic gynecologic surgery, a qualitative template analysis in older adults and their healthcare professionals. Disabil Rehabil 2021; 44:5930-5940. [PMID: 34283686 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1952319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to reveal information that can be used for composing a prehabilitation program tailored to elderly gynecological oncological patients and is applicable to healthcare professionals. We investigated possible content and indications for prehabilitation, and what potential barriers might exist. MATERIALS AND METHODS Because of the primary exploratory study aim, inductive thematic template analysis on semi-structured interviews with gynecologic oncological patients aged ≥60 years and healthcare professionals were used. RESULTS 16 patients and 20 healthcare professionals were interviewed. Three themes important for prehabilitation were found: (1) "Motivation," (2) "Practical issues and facilitators," and (3) "Patient-related factors." A short time interval between diagnosis and surgery was reported as a potential barrier for prehabilitation. Given components for a tailor-made prehabilitation program are: (1) The first contact with a nurse who screens the patients, gives tailor-made advice on prehabilitation and keeps patients motivated and supports them mentally; (2) If patients are referred to a more extensive/supervised program, this should preferably be arranged close to a patients' home. CONCLUSION Based on our findings, an outline of a patient-tailored prehabilitation program was developed. The main important themes for prehabilitation were "Motivation," "Practical issues and facilitators," and "Patient-related factors."IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONPatients and healthcare professionals are positive about prehabilitation.Main themes for designing a prehabilitation program are "Motivation," "Practical issues and facilitators," and "Patient-related factors."Nursing staff can play a key role in prehabilitation.It is important to screen patients for specific impairments to obtain a tailor-made prehabilitation program.For some patients, general advice on prehabilitation might be sufficient, while others may need more supervision.The time interval between diagnosis and surgery is often short and is perceived as a potentially significant barrier for an effective prehabilitation program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera van der Zanden
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands.,Department Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Hester J van der Zaag-Loonen
- Department Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - K Marieke Paarlberg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter J Meijer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
| | - Marian J E Mourits
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Barbara C van Munster
- Department Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|