Sustained response to lenvatinib and pembrolizumab in two patients with KRAS-mutated endometrial mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma

Papillary and ductal patterns of mesonephric-like adenocarcinomas are often overlooked: a retrospective revaluation of over 1000 endometrial carcinomas

AIMS

Mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma (MLA) of the endometrium is often a diagnostic challenge, due to its morphological resemblance to other more common Müllerian neoplasms. This study aimed to retrospectively identify overlooked MLA in a large endometrial carcinoma cohort, using a combination of immunohistochemistry (IHC), morphology and KRAS sequencing.

METHODS AND RESULTS

IHC was conducted on 1094 endometrial carcinomas, identifying 16 potential MLA cases based on GATA3+ and/or TTF1+ and ER- staining patterns, which subsequently underwent detailed histological review, KRAS sequencing and ProMisE molecular classification. Of the IHC screen-positive cases, one was positive for both GATA3 and TTF1, nine were positive for GATA3 only and six were positive for TTF1 only. All IHC screen-positive cases were POLE wild-type. All five tumours in the NSMP category showed morphological features of MLA, while the three MMRd and eight p53abn tumours did not show MLA morphology. The five cases diagnosed as MLA on review were all originally diagnosed as low-grade endometrioid adenocarcinoma probably because of rare morphological patterns, being predominantly papillary or ductal. Four of the five cases harboured a KRAS mutation.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the importance of a comprehensive diagnostic approach for accurately identifying endometrial MLA and for pathologists to be aware of papillary and ductal patterns in endometrial carcinoma assessment. Further exploration into the molecular landscape of MLA is essential for refining diagnostic criteria and developing targeted therapies.

Special Considerations in Classification and Workup of Endometrial Carcinomas

CONTEXT.—

A variety of uncommon malignant endometrial tumors can be challenging to diagnose because of overlapping morphology with more common entities. In some cases, immunohistochemical stains and/or molecular testing allow for more definitive diagnosis or prognostication.

OBJECTIVE.—

To review classic morphologic features of uncommon endometrial tumors, pathologic features of these tumors and their mimics, and the evidence for use of immunohistochemistry and molecular testing in the diagnosis of these tumors.

DATA SOURCES.—

University of Michigan (Ann Arbor) cases and review of pertinent literature about each entity.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Although each of these uncommon endometrial tumors has morphologic mimics, key histologic features, immunohistochemical stains, and molecular testing allow for accurate classification.

Synchronous ovarian and uterine mesonephric-like carcinoma that potentially arose from endometrioid adenofibroma: A case report

Mesonephric-like carcinoma histologically resembles mesonephric adenocarcinoma (MA) of the cervix. MA arises from mesonephric duct remnants. However, the origin of mesonephric-like carcinoma is not extensively studied because of its rarity. Here, we present a case of synchronous ovarian and uterine mesonephric-like carcinoma that potentially arose from endometrioid adenofibroma. A 69-year-old woman presented with an abdominal mass with no genital bleeding. She underwent simple total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral adnexal resection. Histological and immunohistochemical analyses were consistent with mesonephric-like carcinoma involving both ovaries and the uterus. Endometrioid adenofibroma was present in both ovaries, while adenomyosis was observed in the uterus. The glandular duct of the endometrioid adenofibroma in the right ovary had areas suggestive of precursor lesions of mesonephric-like carcinoma. All tumors exhibited the KRAS G12D mutation. These findings suggest that the origin of the mesonephric-like carcinoma was the Müllerian duct, and that the ovarian and uterine tumors were monoclonal.

Mesonephric-Like Adenocarcinoma of Uterine Corpus: A Clinicopathological and Targeted Genomic Profiling Study in a Single Institution

Background

Mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma (MLA) is a recently characterized, rare, and aggressive neoplasm that mostly arises in the uterine corpus and ovary. MLA shows characteristic pathological features similar to mesonephric adenocarcinoma of the cervix. The origin of MLA is still controversial and recognition of it remains challenging for pathologists. The aim of this study was to enrich the clinicopathological features of MLA in the uterine corpus and explore its molecular alterations by targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS).

Methods

Four cases of MLA were identified among a total of 398 endometrial carcinomas diagnosed in our institution between January 2014 and December 2021. Immunohistochemistry and targeted NGS spanning 437 cancer-relevant genes were performed.

Results

The most common symptom was abnormal vaginal bleeding, and the average age was 68 years. Histologically, the tumors showed a mixture of varied growth patterns including papillary, glandular, tubular, cribriform, solid, and slit-like architectures, which were lined by columnar to cuboidal cells with overlapping vesicular nuclei and sometimes nuclear grooves. Intraluminal eosinophilic colloid-like secretions were focally evident in three of the four cases. Immunohistochemically, the MLAs were positive for GATA3 (4/4), TTF-1 (3/3), luminal CD10 (3/3), calretinin (2/3), and patchy P16 (3/3) and were negative for ER (0/4) and PR (0/4). The expression of P53 was “wild type” (4/4). By targeted NGS, 3/4 (75%), 2/4 (50%), and 1/4 (25%) cases harbored PIK3CA, KRAS, and PTEN mutations, respectively. None of the tumors had mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes, ARID1A/B, POLE, CTNNB1, SMARCA4, or TP53. At the time of diagnosis, three were presented with FIGO IB stage and one with IIIC stage. Two patients received postoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy and they were alive without evidence of disease at 8 and 56 months follow-up, respectively. One patient developed pulmonary metastasis 13 months after surgery and chemotherapy, and one was dead of the disease 24 months after the operation without adjuvant therapy.

Conclusions

MLA is a rare and aggressive malignancy, representing approximately 1% of all endometrial carcinomas. It exhibits mixed architectures associated with distinctive immunophenotype and recurrent KRAS and PIK3CA mutations, supporting classified as of Müllerian origin with mesonephric differentiation.

The Evolution of Ovarian Carcinoma Subclassification

Simple Summary

Historically, cancers presenting with their main tumor mass in the ovary have been classified as ovarian carcinomas (a concise term for epithelial ovarian cancer) and treated with a one-size-fits-all approach. Over the last two decades, a growing molecular understanding established that ovarian carcinomas consist of several distinct histologic types, which practically represent different diseases. Further research is now delineating several molecular subtypes within each histotype. This histotype/molecular subtype subclassification provides a framework of grouping tumors based on molecular similarities for research, clinical trial inclusion and future patient management.

Abstract

The phenotypically informed histotype classification remains the mainstay of ovarian carcinoma subclassification. Histotypes of ovarian epithelial neoplasms have evolved with each edition of the WHO Classification of Female Genital Tumours. The current fifth edition (2020) lists five principal histotypes: high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC), mucinous carcinoma (MC), endometrioid carcinoma (EC) and clear cell carcinoma (CCC). Since histotypes arise from different cells of origin, cell lineage-specific diagnostic immunohistochemical markers and histotype-specific oncogenic alterations can confirm the morphological diagnosis. A four-marker immunohistochemical panel (WT1/p53/napsin A/PR) can distinguish the five principal histotypes with high accuracy, and additional immunohistochemical markers can be used depending on the diagnostic considerations. Histotypes are further stratified into molecular subtypes and assessed with predictive biomarker tests. HGSCs have recently been subclassified based on mechanisms of chromosomal instability, mRNA expression profiles or individual candidate biomarkers. ECs are composed of the same molecular subtypes (POLE-mutated/mismatch repair-deficient/no specific molecular profile/p53-abnormal) with the same prognostic stratification as their endometrial counterparts. Although methylation analyses and gene expression and sequencing showed at least two clusters, the molecular subtypes of CCCs remain largely elusive to date. Mutational and immunohistochemical data on LGSC have suggested five molecular subtypes with prognostic differences. While our understanding of the molecular composition of ovarian carcinomas has significantly advanced and continues to evolve, the need for treatment options suitable for these alterations is becoming more obvious. Further preclinical studies using histotype-defined and molecular subtype-characterized model systems are needed to expand the therapeutic spectrum for women diagnosed with ovarian carcinomas.