Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced stage endometrial cancer: A systematic review

Selective utilization of circulating tumor DNA testing enables disease monitoring in endometrial and ovarian carcinomas

OBJECTIVE

Biomarkers reflecting real-time response to therapy and recurrence are lacking. We assessed the clinical value of detecting cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) mutations in endometrial cancer (EC) and ovarian cancer (OC) patients.

METHODS

EC/OC patients undergoing primary surgery were consented for tissue banking and 2-year serial blood draws. Tumor tissue DNA and plasma ctDNA underwent next generation sequencing using a targeted gene panel for somatic mutations.

RESULTS

Of 44 patients (24 EC, 17 OC, 2 synchronous endometrial and ovarian carcinomas [SEOC] and 1 endocervical adenocarcinoma [EA]) at least one somatic mutation was identified in tumor tissue in 40 (91%, 20/24 EC, all OC/SEOC/EA), and in preoperative plasma ctDNA in 12 (27%) patients (6/24 [25%] EC and 6/17 [35%] OC). Detection of preoperative ctDNA mutations was associated with advanced stage, higher preoperative CA125, and subsequent disease recurrence. In 5/12 (42%) patients with preoperative ctDNA mutations, examination/imaging suggested clinical stage I however final pathology revealed stage II/III. In 11 patients where serial timepoints were assessed during treatment for ctDNA and CA125, ctDNA clearance preceded normalization of CA125. Thirteen patients developed recurrent disease (4 EC, 8 OC, 1 EA); 8 in whom ctDNA mutations were detected postoperatively, and 4 followed through time of recurrence with ctDNA mutations identified 2-5 months prior to clinical/radiologic/biomarker progression in 3.

CONCLUSION

ctDNA can reflect larger tumor volume/metastases, treatment response and subsequent disease recurrence in EC and OC. Careful patient selection is critical to direct resources to patients most likely to benefit, considering disease burden and risk group.

Lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves overall survival in clinical stage III endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether performing a lymph node dissection during hysterectomy improves overall survival in patients with clinical stage III endometrial cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried to identify all patients with clinical stage III endometrial cancer who had undergone pre-operative chemotherapy as first course of treatment followed by hysterectomy with or without lymph node dissection between the years 2004 and 2020. Univariable and multivariable models were performed to investigate prognostic factors on overall survival.

RESULTS

This study analyzed 2882 patients with clinical stage III endometrial cancer who received upfront chemotherapy. Among those who underwent lymph node dissection, 38% had positive lymph nodes. Factors found to be independently associated with improved survival included lymph node dissection (p<0.001), adjuvant radiation (p<0.001), histology (p<0.001), tumor grade (p<0.001), pathologic node status (p<0.001), age (p<0.001), type of insurance (p=0.027), and race (p<0.001). Patients who underwent lymph node dissection at time of hysterectomy had a significantly better overall survival (107 vs 85 months; p<0.001). Multivariate and propensity score analyses robustly demonstrated that lymph node dissection significantly improved overall survival (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.84, p<0.001), even among patients with pathologically negative lymph nodes.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that performing lymph node dissection at the time of hysterectomy is associated with improved overall survival in all patients with stage III endometrial cancer who receive upfront chemotherapy, regardless of age, race, insurance status, histologic subtype, tumor grade, pathologic node status, adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy. Notably, patients with high-risk disease may particularly benefit from this approach.

Sociodemographic, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns of endometrial cancer cases in Puerto Rico during the period 2009 to 2015: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Over the past decades, the rising incidence rates of endometrial cancer have made it a significant public health concern for women worldwide. Treatment strategies for endometrial cancer vary based on several factors such as stage, histology, the patient's overall health, and preferences. However, limited amount of research on treatment patterns and potential correlations with sociodemographic characteristics among Hispanics is available. This study analyzes the treatment patterns for patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer in Puerto Rico.

METHODS

A secondary database analysis was performed on endometrial cancer cases reported to the Puerto Rico Central Cancer Registry-Health Insurance Linkage Database from 2009 to 2015 (n = 2,488). The study population's sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were described, along with an overview of the therapy options provided to patients receiving care on the island. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association of sociodemographic/clinical characteristics with treatment patterns stratified by risk of recurrence.

RESULTS

In our cohort, most patients were insured through Medicaid and had a median age of 60 years. Almost 90% of patients received surgery as the first course of treatment. Surgery alone was the most common treatment for low-risk patients (80.2%). High-risk patients were more likely to receive surgery with radiotherapy and chemotherapy (24.4%). Patients with Medicare insurance were five times (HR: 4.84; 95% CI: 2.45-9.58; p < 0.001) more likely to receive surgery when compared with patients insured with Medicaid. In contrast, those with private insurance were twice as likely to receive surgery (HR: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.40-4.04; p = 0.001) when compared to those with Medicaid.

CONCLUSION

These findings provide insight into the treatment patterns for endometrial cancer in Puerto Rico and highlight the importance of considering factors such as disease risk when making treatment decisions. Addressing these gaps in treatment patterns can contribute to effective management of endometrial cancer.

Role of endometrial sampling to differentiate between advanced endometrial versus ovarian malignancy: retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Distinguishing between advanced stage endometrial and ovarian cancer at diagnosis can be challenging, especially when patients do not present with abnormal uterine bleeding. Given emerging systemic therapies specific for ovarian versus endometrial cancers, it has become increasingly critical to establish the correct diagnosis at presentation to ensure appropriate treatment. This study evaluates the frequency with which advanced endometrial cancer is mistakenly presumed to be ovarian cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of patients with a final diagnosis of advanced endometrial cancer treated consecutively at a single academic institution between 2013 and 2022. Variables abstracted included abnormal uterine bleeding, endometrial sampling, and timing of endometrial cancer diagnosis. We quantified incorrect diagnoses made after 2018, when frontline targeted treatments differentiating advanced endometrial from advanced ovarian cancer became available.

RESULTS

We identified 270 patients with an ultimate diagnosis of stage III or IV endometrial cancer. The most common presenting symptom was abnormal uterine bleeding (219/270, 81%), followed by abdominal or pelvic pain (48/270, 18%) and bloating (27/270, 10%). Forty-eight patients (18%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, of whom 11 (23%) had an incorrect diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Since 2018, six patients have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy for presumed ovarian cancer, three of whom received a systemic regimen specific for ovarian cancer when they, in fact, had endometrial cancer.

CONCLUSION

In patients with presumed advanced ovarian cancer dispositioned to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, endometrial sampling can identify some cases that are actually primary endometrial cancers. Correct diagnosis guides the use of appropriate antineoplastic therapies, optimizing response and survival outcomes while minimizing toxicity and cost of unindicated therapies.

Temporal Trends in Treatment and Outcomes of Endometrial Carcinoma in the United States, 2005-2020

Endometrial cancer has continued to see a rising incidence in the US over the years. The main aim of this study was to assess current trends in patients' characteristics and outcomes of treatment for endometrial carcinoma over 16 years. A dataset from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for patients diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma from 2005 to 2020 was used in this retrospective, case series study. The main outcomes and measures of interest included tumor characteristics, hospitalization, treatments, mortality, and overall survival. Then, 569,817 patients who were diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma were included in this study. The mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 62.7 (11.6) years, but 66,184 patients (11.6%) were younger than 50 years, indicating that more patients are getting diagnosed at younger ages. Of the patients studied, 37,079 (6.3%) were Hispanic, 52,801 (9.3%) were non-Hispanic Black, 432,058 (75.8%) were non-Hispanic White, and 48,879 (8.6%) were other non-Hispanic. Patients in the 4th period from 2017 to 2020 were diagnosed more with stage IV (7.1% vs. 5.2% vs. 5.4% vs. 5.9%; p < 0.001) disease compared with those in the other three periods. More patients with severe comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index score of three) were seen in period 4 compared to the first three periods (3.9% vs. ≤1.9%). Systemic chemotherapy use (14.1% vs. 17.7% vs. 20.4% vs. 21.1%; p < 0.001) and immunotherapy (0.01% vs. 0.01% vs. 0.2% vs. 1.1%; p < 0.001) significantly increased from period 1 to 4. The use of laparotomy decreased significantly from 42.1% in period 2 to 16.7% in period 4, while robotic surgery usage significantly increased from 41.5% in period 2 to 64.3% in period 4. The 30-day and 90-day mortality decreased from 0.6% in period 1 to 0.2% in period 4 and 1.4% in period 1 to 0.6% in period 4, respectively. Over the period studied, we found increased use of immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and minimally invasive surgery for the management of endometrial cancer. Overall, the time interval from cancer diagnosis to final surgery increased by about 6 days. The improvements observed in the outcomes examined can probably be associated with the treatment trends observed.

Recent Advances in Endometrial Cancer Prevention, Early Diagnosis and Treatment

Endometrial cancer is the sixth commonest cancer in women worldwide, with over 417,000 diagnoses in 2020. The disease incidence has increased by 132% over the last 30 years and is set to continue to rise in response to an ageing population and increasing global rates of obesity and diabetes. A greater understanding of the mechanisms driving endometrial carcinogenesis has led to the identification of potential strategies for primary disease prevention, although prospective evaluation of their efficacy within clinical trials is still awaited. The early diagnosis of endometrial cancer is associated with improved survival, but has historically relied on invasive endometrial sampling. New, minimally invasive tests using protein and DNA biomarkers and cytology have the potential to transform diagnostic pathways and to allow for the surveillance of high-risk populations. The molecular classification of endometrial cancers has been shown to not only have a prognostic impact, but also to have therapeutic value and is increasingly used to guide adjuvant treatment decisions. Advanced and recurrent disease management has also been revolutionised by increasing the use of debulking surgery and targeted treatments, particularly immunotherapy. This review summarises the recent advances in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of endometrial cancer and seeks to identify areas for future research.

Malignant mixed mullerian tumors: a SEER database review of rurality and treatment modalities on disease outcome

Introduction

Malignant Mixed Mullerian Tumors (MMMT) are rare and poorly understood sarcomas with limited research on risk factors, pathogenesis, and optimal treatments. This study aimed to address this knowledge gap and explore the impact of community size, patient characteristics, disease characteristics, and treatment modalities on MMMT outcomes.

Methods

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER), the largest SEER cohort to date of 3,352 MMMT patients was analyzed for demographic factors, treatment modalities, and histologic characteristics. Data was processed, including the removal of incomplete entries, and analyzed in Python 3.1 using packages scikit-learn, lifelines, and torch; log-rank analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate a number of demographic characteristics and disease characteristics for significance in regard to survival.

Results

Our study found adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy significantly improved survival, with modest benefits from neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Our findings also suggest age at diagnosis, disease grade, and suburban versus rural geographic locations may play key roles in patient prognosis. On multivariable analysis both disease Grade and surgical treatment were significant factors.

Discussion

MMMTs remain challenging, but appropriate treatment appears to enhance survival. The present findings suggest opportunities for improved outcomes and treatment strategies for patients with MMMTs.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IVB uterine serous carcinoma: a Turkish multicentric study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic factors for and determine the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) on oncologic outcome in stage IVB pure serous endometrial carcinoma patients who received taxane and platinum. Forty-two patients with 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IVB uterine serous carcinoma were enrolled from six gynecologic oncology centers and a study group was created. The study group had a 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) of 32% and 2-year disease-specific survival (DSS) of 73%. On univariate analysis; lymphadenectomy (not performed vs. performed), paraaortic lymph node metastasis (positive vs. negative) and number of metastatic lymph node count (≤5 vs. >5) were found to have statistical significance for DFS (p < 0.001, p = 0.026 and p = 0.044, respectively). Adnexal metastasis (positive vs. negative) and type of cytoreductive surgery (maximal vs. optimal and suboptimal) had statistical significance for DSS (p = 0.041 and p = 0.015, respectively). Receiving NACT did not affect DFS and DSS in stage IVB uterine serous carcinoma patients. As our sample size was small, precise conclusions could not be made for suggesting the use of NACT in advanced stage uterine serous carcinoma. For more accurate results, more randomized controlled studies are needed in this patient group.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Endometrial carcinoma is the most common type of gynecologic tract malignancies and usually it is diagnosed at early stages. Although the favorable prognosis, uterine serous carcinoma (USC), one of the rarest subtypes, has a poorer prognosis when compared to other histological subtypes. USC has a propensity to spread beyond pelvis. Due to this aggressive behavior, surgical intervention could not be feasible in advanced stage disease.What do the results of this study add? Our study evaluated the prognostic factors that affect survival in advanced stage USC patients. Also we investigated that neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) could improve oncologic outcomes. Performing lymphadenectomy, presence of paraaortic lymph node and adnexal metastasis, number of metastatic lymph nodes and type of cytoreductive surgery improved survival in advanced stage USC patients. However, NACT did not have a statistical significance as a predictor for disease-specific survival (DSS) and disease-free survival (DFS).What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Maximal surgical effort should be performed in advanced stage USC according to our results. On the other hand, NACT had no impact on DSS and DFS rates. For this reason, we could not be able to suggest the routine use of NACT in advanced stage USC. But more randomized controlled trials are warranted for confirmation of our results.

Optimal Management for Stage IVB Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review

(1) Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) is a common gynecological malignancy, often diagnosed at an early stage with a high overall survival rate. Surgical treatment is the primary approach, guided by pathological and molecular characteristics. Stage IVB EC, characterized by intra and/or extra-abdominal metastasis, presents a significant challenge with no clear consensus on optimal management. (2) Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted from January to May 2023, covering studies from 2000 to 2023. Eligible studies included retrospective case series, prospective trials, and randomized clinical trials. (3) Results: Of 116 studies identified, 21 were deemed relevant: 7 on primary surgery, 10 on neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), and 4 on adjuvant treatment. Notably, the impact of residual tumor after primary surgery was a critical factor affecting survival. The use of NACT followed by interval debulking surgery showed promise, particularly in cases deemed unresectable. Adjuvant treatment, combining radiotherapy and chemotherapy, demonstrated improved survival but lacked consensus regarding its role. (4) Conclusions: Stage IVB EC poses a complex challenge with limited evidence to guide management. Optimal cytoreduction remains crucial, and NACT should be considered for unresectable cases. Multimodality adjuvant therapy may benefit patients, even with disease spread beyond the pelvis. Future advances in molecular classification and targeted therapies are expected to enhance treatment strategies.

Current Evidence-Based Systemic Therapy for Advanced and Recurrent Endometrial Cancer

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy, with worldwide increasing incidence and disease-associated mortality. Although most patients with EC are diagnosed with early-stage disease, systemic treatment options for patients with advanced or recurrent EC have historically been limited. EC-focused clinical trials and the ensuing therapeutic landscape have expanded since The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) identified 4 distinct EC subgroups associated with differential survival. This endeavor revolutionized our understanding of the genomic characterization of EC as well as molecular drivers of this heterogeneous malignancy, leading to precision oncology approaches to therapeutics and advancement in treatment options. This review describes the current status of and recent advancements in therapeutic options for patients with advanced and recurrent EC. The NCCN Guidelines for Uterine Neoplasms provide detailed recommendations regarding the diagnosis, workup, and management of EC.

Deciphering comprehensive features of tumor microenvironment controlled by chromatin regulators to predict prognosis and guide therapies in uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma

Background

Dysregulation of chromatin regulators (CRs) can perturb the tumor immune microenvironment, but the underlying mechanism remains unclear. We focused on uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC) and used gene expression data from TCGA-UCEC to investigate this mechanism.

Methods

We used weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and consensus clustering algorithm to classify UCEC patients into Cluster_L and Cluster_H. TME-associated CRs were identified using WGCNA and differential gene expression analysis. A CR risk score (CRRS) was constructed using univariate Cox and LASSO-Cox regression analyses. A nomogram was developed based on CRRS and clinicopathologic factors to predict patients' prognosis.

Results

Lower CRRS was associated with lower grade, more benign molecular subtypes, and improved survival. Patients with low CRRS showed abundant immune infiltration, a higher mutation burden, fewer CNVs, and better response to immunotherapy. Moreover, low CRRS patients were more sensitive to 24 chemotherapeutic agents.

Conclusion

A comprehensive assessment of CRRS could identify immune activation and improve the efficacy of UCEC treatments.

Beyond Serous: Treatment Options for Rare Endometrial Cancers

OPINION STATEMENT

Rare endometrial cancers are high-grade, aggressive malignancies which are often diagnosed at an advanced stage, and account for disproportionately more deaths than their more common low-grade counterparts. Standard of care includes a combination of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Surgery consists of complete hysterectomy, and more recent evidence supports replacing a full lymphadenectomy with sentinel node mapping. Paclitaxel and carboplatin remain the mainstays of chemotherapy, while current studies incorporating immunotherapy will inform future practice. Whether and how to incorporate radiation remains controversial, and certain histologic subtypes, such as carcinosarcomas, may benefit from radiation more than others. Owing to their relative rarity, it is difficult to conduct clinical trials in this patient population, which has hindered the development of effective therapies for rare malignancies. Molecular profiling has offered insight into the pathogenesis of rare endometrial cancers, providing actionable targets for personalized therapy.

Less is more in endometrial cancer (SLN, conservative treatment, radical hysterectomy, molecular classification)

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The management of endometrial cancer has known many evolutions within the last decades. In this review, we aim to summarize recent evolutions (mainly toward less aggressive management) that have occurred in the management of endometrial cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Enhanced by molecular classification, the determination of lymph node status, in young women, in case of cervical invasion, the treatment is evolving toward a less aggressive strategy.

SUMMARY

The predictive value and the safety of sentinel lymph node biopsy explain why most societies propose to abandon systematic pelvic and para aortic lymphadenectomy. For young women, the safety of fertility preservation is now well established and efficient protocols have been validated. In stage II endometrial cancer (stromal cervical invasion), radical hysterectomy appears excessive. The Cancer Genome Atlas classification increases prognostic evaluation in association with the traditional pathological classification and permits to tailor adjuvant treatment more accurately.