Perceptions and Care Recommendations from Previvors: Qualitative Analysis of Female BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers’ Experience with Genetic Testing and Counseling

Intersectionality, BRCA Genetic Testing, and Intrafamilial Communication of Risk: A Qualitative Study

Significant health disparities exist in relation to pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2. This study aimed to better understand the barriers and facilitators to BRCA1/2 genetic testing and intrafamilial communication of risk in racially and ethnically diverse individuals. We conducted qualitative interviews with non-Hispanic White (n = 11) and Black, Indigenous, People of Color (BIPOC) individuals (n = 14) who underwent testing for pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants. We employed template analysis, case study analysis, and comparative case study analysis to examine healthcare experiences related to genetic testing as well as intrafamilial communication of risk. Applying an intersectional lens, we sought to inform more person-centered approaches to precision healthcare and help dismantle disparities in genomic healthcare. Template analysis revealed salient factors at the individual (psychosocial well-being), interpersonal/familial, and healthcare system levels. A two-part case study analysis provided insights into how race/ethnicity, cultural norms, and socioeconomic status interact with systemic and structural inequities to compound disparities. These findings underscore the need for person-centered, tailored, and culturally sensitive approaches to understanding and addressing the complexities surrounding testing and the communication of BRCA risk. Applying an intersectional lens can inform more person-centered approaches to precision healthcare and may help to surmount existing disparities.

Information needs of Lynch syndrome and BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers considering risk-reducing gynecological surgery: a qualitative study of the decision-making process

BACKGROUND

Risk-reducing gynecological surgery (RRGS) is a prophylactic procedure that may be offered to BRCA1, BRCA2, and Lynch syndrome (LS) mutation carriers to reduce the risk of developing gynecological cancer. This study was conducted to better understand patients' information needs and evaluate how patients weigh different sources of information in their decision-making process surrounding RRGS.

METHODS

This study used a qualitative approach to understanding women's perspectives towards RRGS. Semi-structured interviews were conducted virtually with 8 women. Women offered RRGS between 35 and 70 years of age who are English-speaking and have an identifiable BRCA or LS mutation were included. Data from interviews was coded with constant comparative analysis to develop themes.

RESULTS

Of the eight women, six had selected to undergo either prophylactic hysterectomy or oophorectomy: 5 decided yes to RRGS; 1 decided no; 2 were undecided. Thematic analysis found that the key factors affecting women's decisions around prophylactic surgery were cancer risk, surgical menopause, and psychological readiness. To make an informed decision, women relied most heavily on information provided by healthcare professionals (e.g. doctors, genetic counselors) and family members with prior cancer experience. However, some women reported that they did not feel adequately informed enough to make a decision and identified COVID-19 as a significant barrier affecting access to information.

CONCLUSION

This qualitative study revealed the key sources of information influencing attitudes regarding RRGS and how women consulted different sources of information to reach a decision. Results underscore the need for greater attention to women's information needs in the context of psychological readiness, particularly amidst the pandemic. Research involving a larger sample size may help to better inform how support can be provided to individuals with BRCA and LS mutations considering RRGS.

Cancer survivorship care: challenges and opportunities in Japan

This article discusses the current international scope and practices of cancer survivorship care and the challenges and opportunities of survivorship care in Japan. Cancer is a common illness in Japan; however, the national cancer control plan focuses only on limited survivorship-related issues, and there is no official national-level survivorship care strategy that addresses the diverse unmet needs of survivors. There is an urgent need to discuss and implement measures for quality survivorship care delivery under the current healthcare system in Japan. The Development of Survivorship Care Coordination Model Research Group, 2022, organized under the National Cancer Center Japan research grant from 2019 to 2022, identified four tasks that are required to realize quality survivorship care: (i) providing education opportunities for survivorship care stakeholders to raise awareness about the concept and the necessity of cancer survivorship care, (ii) providing training opportunities and cancer survivorship care certification for community healthcare providers, (iii) enforcing the economic basis of survivorship care and (iv) creating simpler systems that are organically linked with existing care systems. Collaboration among multiple players is indispensable to developing the philosophy of survivorship care and efficient care delivery. For this purpose, we need a platform where diverse players can participate equally towards the same goal: cancer survivors' optimal wellness.

Stress, anxiety, and health-related quality of life in BRCA1/2-positive women with and without cancer: A comparison of four US female samples

•

Anxiety and stress were significantly worse in BRCA1/2-positive women compared to comparable US female samples.

•

All health-related quality of life domains were better in BRCA1/2-positive women except energy/vitality, which was lower.

•

Patient-provider training and mental health referrals are needed to lessen psychosocial consequences of genetic testing.

Introduction

Women with BRCA1/2 mutations have a 11–72% increased risk of breast/ovarian cancers throughout their lifetime. The current study examines psychosocial differences between the current sample of BRCA1/2-positive women with and without cancer histories and three comparable United States (US) female samples without BRCA1/2 mutations.

Methods

Sixty BRCA1/2-positive women (with and without cancer histories) were recruited through multiple private online support groups in the US. Participants completed an online survey outlining sociodemographic and genetic counseling information, and anxiety, stress, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes. Outcomes were compared to three similar US female normative samples via independent samples t-test analyses.

Results

State and trait anxiety (p = 0.00) and stress (p = 0.001) were significantly worse in the current sample of BRCA1/2-positive women compared comparable US female samples. All HRQoL domains were significantly better in the current sample except energy/vitality, which was significantly lower (p = 0.02) in the current sample. Results were stratified by cancer and recurrence status.

Conclusions

This study provides insight into how a sample of BRCA1/2-positive women both with and without cancer fare post-genetic counseling as compared to three normative female populations. Results infer the need for additional education, patient-provider training, and mental health referrals to support this population in order to circumvent unintended consequences and to improve psychosocial health in those being tested for, and those who test positive for, BRCA1/2 genetic mutations.