Future developments in esophageal cancer research

Safety and Efficacy of Self-Expandable Metallic Stent Placement Using Low Radial Force Stent for Malignant Dysphagia after Radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement in patients with prior radiotherapy (RT) using the Niti-S stent, which is characterized by low radial force, in comparison to patients without prior RT.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 83 patients who were treated by SEMS placement using Niti-S stent for severe malignant esophageal obstruction or fistula were enrolled. The adverse event rates and efficacy were retrospectively compared between patients with/without prior RT before SEMS placement (RT group [n = 32] versus non-RT group [n = 51]).

RESULTS

The incidence rate of major adverse events in the RT group was 6.3% and was not significantly different from that in the non-RT group (5.9%, p = 0.95). Among the RT group, 84.4% were able to resume oral intake within a median of 2 days. Among the patients with fistula, 78.6% could resume oral intake and survive for 73 days after SEMS placement. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis identified significant factors affecting overall survival to be prior RT (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.96), low performance status (HR: 3.87), and subsequent anticancer treatment after SEMS placement (HR: 0.41). However, compared to the non-RT group, the RT group had received longer duration of anticancer treatment before SEMS placement and a lower rate of subsequent anticancer treatment after SEMS placement.

CONCLUSIONS

With the Niti-S stent, the incidence of major adverse events was sufficiently low even for patients after RT. SEMS with low radial force would be an effective palliative treatment option for patients, regardless of prior RT.

Road map to esophagectomy for nurses

Esophageal cancer, although considered uncommon in the United States, continues to exhibit increased incidence. Esophageal cancer now ranks seventh among cancers in mortality for men in the United States. Even as treatment continues to advance, the mortality rate remains high, with a 5-year survival rate less than 35%. Esophageal cancer typically is discovered in advanced stages, which reduces the treatment options. When disease is locally advanced, esophagectomy remains the standard for treatment. Surgery remains challenging and complicated. Multiple surgical approaches are available, with the choice determined by tumor location and stage of disease. Recovery is often fraught with complications-both physical and emotional. Nursing care revolves around complex care managing multiple body systems and providing effective education and emotional support for both patients and patients' families. Even after recovery, local recurrence and distant metastases are common. Early diagnosis, surgical advancement, and improvements in postoperative care continue to improve outcomes.

An expert opinion on esophageal cancer therapy

INTRODUCTION

Worldwide, esophageal cancer (EC) is the seventh leading cause of cancer-related death, with its incidence increasing in the US, where a change in its epidemiology has been noted. Most patients present with regional or distant disease and, therefore, have a very poor prognosis.

AREAS COVERED

Progress made over the last 20 years in the diagnosis, staging and management of EC is focused on in this review, with the emphasis on locally-advanced disease treated with curative intent. Evidence is reviewed from prospective randomized trials and meta-analyses and data are presented regarding new therapy with targeted agents. Although surgery has been the mainstay of treatment for EC, survival with this approach alone remains disappointing. As a result, combined modality treatment (CMT) including chemotherapy and radiation has been incorporated into the treatment paradigm for both operable and inoperable disease. The evidence supporting CMT for EC, the role of surgery at different stages, and how treatment strategies differ based on histology are outlined.

EXPERT OPINION

Trends in 5-year overall survival rates over the last 30 years have increased (from 5 to 17%), suggesting that small, yet significant, improvements in diagnosis, staging, treatment and supportive care are being made. Clearly, the choice of treatment should be guided by disease stage, histology and patient co-morbidities.