Molecular Approaches to Identify Helicobacter pylori Antimicrobial Resistance

Clarithromycin sustained-release tablet may be an improper therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori

Background

Clarithromycin plays an important role in eradicating Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) through quadruple therapy. However, there is limited research on whether different forms of clarithromycin dosage have similar efficacies against H. pylori.

Objective

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different forms of clarithromycin dosage in bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for eradicating H. pylori.

Design

A single-center retrospective analysis comparing the efficacy of different forms of clarithromycin dosage in eradicating H. pylori.

Methods

An analysis was conducted on patients diagnosed with H. pylori infection through the 13C-urea breath test (13C-UBT) at Henan Provincial People's Hospital, China from 2020 to 2022 who were treated with either a dispersible or sustained-release clarithromycin tablet (500 mg each), alongside amoxicillin (1000 mg), a standard dose of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), and bismuth citrate (220 mg), administered twice daily as part of bismuth-containing quadruple therapy. Treatment efficacy was assessed using 13C-UBT at least 4 weeks after treatment completion. The H. pylori eradication rate was the primary outcome of this study, and factors influencing it were analyzed.

Results

Among 2094 screened patients, 307 with H. pylori infection (mean age, 41.8 ± 0.7 years; 43% men) received bismuth-containing quadruple therapy. Univariate analysis of the dispersible and sustained-release tablet groups revealed a lower eradication rate with the sustained-release tablet compared with the dispersible clarithromycin tablet regimen (75.26% (73/97) vs 95.26% (200/210), respectively; p < 0.05). Other factors, such as smoking, age, and PPI type, were not significantly associated with the cure rate. Multivariate analysis identified the form of clarithromycin dosage (dispersible vs sustained-release) to be an independent risk factor for eradication failure using the bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (odds ratio = 0.145, 95% confidence interval: (0.065-0.323); p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The clarithromycin dispersible tablet demonstrated a higher H. pylori eradication rate, and the sustained-release clarithromycin tablet may be inappropriate for H. pylori eradication.

Description of a Case of Helicobacter pylori Infection with In Vitro Resistance to Tetracycline: An Exceptional Event with No Consequences?

Resistance in Helicobacter pylori to tetracycline is rare. We describe the case of an H. pylori strain with a high level of resistance to tetracycline (minimum inhibitory concentration = 12 mg/L). However, despite tetracycline resistance, bismuth quadritherapy was effective. Analysis of the patient's antibiotic treatment history over the previous 25 years revealed repeated 3-month courses of tetracycline for the treatment of acne, suggesting in vivo selection pressure responsible for the emergence of the triple mutation (AGA→TTC) in 16S rDNA associated with tetracycline resistance. This is a rare event but one worth monitoring, especially in view of the widespread use of bismuth quadritherapy for probabilistic treatment in countries where it is available.

Molecular testing-guided therapy versus susceptibility testing-guided therapy in first-line and third-line Helicobacter pylori eradication: two multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trials

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori infection is an important causal factor of gastric cancer and peptic ulcer disease and is associated with immune thrombocytopenic purpura and functional dyspepsia. In H pylori strains, point mutations in the 23S rRNA and gyrA genes are associated with clarithromycin resistance and levofloxacin resistance, respectively. Whether the efficacy of molecular testing-guided therapy is non-inferior to that of susceptibility testing-guided therapy for H pylori eradication is unclear. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of molecular testing-guided therapy and traditional culture-based susceptibility testing-guided therapy in first-line and third-line treatment of H pylori infection.

METHODS

We did two multicentre, open-label randomised trials in Taiwan. In trial 1 (done at seven hospitals), treatment-naive individuals infected with H pylori who were aged 20 years or older were eligible for study inclusion. In trial 2 (done at six hospitals), individuals aged 20 years or older who failed treatment after two or more eradication therapies for H pylori infection were eligible for enrolment. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either molecular testing-guided therapy or susceptibility testing-guided therapy. The randomisation sequence was generated by computer using permuted block randomisation with a block size of 4. All investigators were masked to the randomisation sequence. Clarithromycin and levofloxacin resistance were determined by agar dilution test for measuring minimum inhibitory concentrations in the susceptibility testing-guided therapy group, and by PCR and direct sequencing for detection of 23S rRNA and gyrA mutations in the molecular testing-guided therapy group. Study participants received clarithromycin sequential therapy, levofloxacin sequential therapy, or bismuth quadruple therapy according to the resistance status to clarithromycin and levofloxacin. The 13C-urease breath test was used to determine the status of H pylori infection at least 6 weeks after eradication therapy. The primary outcome was the eradication rate by intention-to-treat analysis. The frequency of adverse effects was analysed in patients with available data. The prespecified margins for non-inferiority were 5% for trial 1 and 10% for trial 2. The trials are ongoing for post-eradication follow-up and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03556254 for trial 1, and NCT03555526 for trial 2.

FINDINGS

Between March 28, 2018, and April 23, 2021, 560 eligible treatment-naive patients with H pylori infection were recruited and randomly assigned to the molecular testing-guided therapy group or the susceptibility testing-guided therapy group in trial 1. Between Dec 28, 2017, and Oct 27, 2020, 320 eligible patients with refractory H pylori infection were recruited and randomly assigned to the molecular testing-guided therapy group or the susceptibility testing-guided therapy group in trial 2. 272 men and 288 women were recruited for trial 1, and 98 men and 222 women were recruited for trial 2. In first-line H pylori treatment, infection was eradicated in 241 (86%, 95% CI 82-90) of 280 patients in the molecular testing-guided therapy group and 243 (87%, 83-91) of 280 patients in the susceptibility testing-guided therapy group by intention-to-treat analysis (p=0·81). In third-line H pylori treatment, infection was eradicated in 141 (88%, 83-93) of 160 patients in the molecular testing-guided therapy group and 139 (87%, 82-92) of 160 patients in the susceptibility testing-guided therapy group by intention-to-treat analysis (p=0·74). The difference in the eradication rate between the molecular testing-guided therapy group and the susceptibility testing-guided therapy group was -0·7% (95% CI -6·4 to 5·0; non-inferiority p=0·071) in trial 1 and 1·3% (-6·0 to 8·5; non-inferiority p=0·0018 in trial 2 by intention-to-treat analysis. We found no difference in adverse effects across both treatment groups in trial 1 and trial 2.

INTERPRETATION

Molecular testing-guided therapy was similar to susceptibility testing-guided therapy in first-line therapy and non-inferior to susceptibility testing guided therapy in third-line treatment of H pylori infection, supporting the use of molecular testing-guided therapy for H pylori eradication.

FUNDING

Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan, and Centre of Precision Medicine of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education of Taiwan.

The State of the Art of Molecular Fecal Investigations for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) Antibiotic Resistances

A new paradigm shift for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection would be timely due to a progressive increase in antibiotic resistance. Such a shift in the perspective of the H. pylori approach should include the preliminary assessment of antibiotic resistance. However, the availability of sensitivity tests is not widespread and the guidelines have always indicated empirical treatments without taking into account the need to make sensitivity tests accessible, i.e., the necessary starting point for improving results in different geographical areas. Currently, the traditional tools for this purpose (culture) are based on performing an invasive investigation (endoscopy) and often involve technical difficulties; thus, they were only confined to the settings where multiple attempts at eradication have failed. In contrast, genotypic resistance testing of fecal samples using molecular biology methods is much less invasive and more acceptable to patients. The purpose of this review is to update the state of the art of molecular fecal susceptibility testing for the management of this infection and to extensively discuss the potential benefits of their large-scale deployment, i.e., novel pharmacological opportunities.

Clinical Implications of Helicobacter pylori Antibiotic Resistance in Italy: A Review of the Literature

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) resistance to antibiotics has increased worldwide in recent decades, especially to clarithromycin. As a result, the World Health Organization (WHO) identified clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori as a "high priority" pathogen in 2017. As international guidelines recommend empirical therapy as first-line treatment, it is crucial to know local resistance rates and history of antibiotic use to determine the most appropriate first-line antibiotic treatment. Italy is one of the European countries with the highest prevalence of H. pylori infection and the highest percentage of antibiotic-resistant H. pylori. The aim of this review is to summarize all data on H. pylori antibiotic resistance in Italy in order to quantify the current rate and determine the most effective therapeutic approach. The study confirms an elevated level of resistance to clarithromycin, metronidazole, and levofloxacin in Italy. In addition, our results show a satisfactory eradication rate for a bismuth-based regimen when used as first- or second-line treatment. Naive patients are also successfully treated with clarithromycin-based quadruple therapies. Considering the good results of bismuth-based therapy as recovery therapy, this argues for the potential use of clarithromycin quadruple therapy as a first-line treatment.

Biomarker Characterization and Prediction of Virulence and Antibiotic Resistance from Helicobacter pylori Next Generation Sequencing Data

The Gram-negative bacterium Helicobacter pylori colonizes c.a. 50% of human stomachs worldwide and is the major risk factor for gastric adenocarcinoma. Its high genetic variability makes it difficult to identify biomarkers of early stages of infection that can reliably predict its outcome. Moreover, the increasing antibiotic resistance found in H. pylori defies therapy, constituting a major human health problem. Here, we review H. pylori virulence factors and genes involved in antibiotic resistance, as well as the technologies currently used for their detection. Furthermore, we show that next generation sequencing may lead to faster characterization of virulence factors and prediction of the antibiotic resistance profile, thus contributing to personalized treatment and management of H. pylori-associated infections. With this new approach, more and permanent data will be generated at a lower cost, opening the future to new applications for H. pylori biomarker identification and antibiotic resistance prediction.

Clinical Effect of Clarithromycin Combined with Tinidazole on Helicobacter pylori-Related Gastritis and Its Influence on COX-2 Expression

Studies have shown that COX-2 expression is upregulated in gastric cancer (GC) as well as in precancerous lesions and in Helicobacter pylori-induced inflammation, suggesting that cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) may play an important role in gastric carcinogenesis. We attempted to investigate the role of clarithromycin with tinidazole on Helicobacter pylori-related gastritis from the aspects of clinical effect and COX-2 expression. From January 2016 to January 2019, 130 patients with Helicobacter pylori-related chronic gastritis were collected and grouped into the observation group (OG) and the control group (CG). Altogether, 80 patients in the OG were treated with clarithromycin with tinidazole, while 50 patients in the CG were treated with amoxicillin with metronidazole. Clinical symptom improvement time, content of COX-2 and B cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2), content of inflammatory factors interleukin-1 (IL-1), IL-4, and C-reactive protein (CRP), expression level of nutritional indicators serum albumin (ALB), realbumin (PA), and transferrin (TF), clearance of Helicobacter pylori, total effective rate, and incidence of adverse reactions were detected. Compared with the CG, the OG had shorter clinical symptom improvement time, lower COX-2 and Bcl-2, lower expression of inflammatory factors IL-1, IL-4, and CRP, higher expression of nutritional indicators ALB, TF, and PA, higher clearance rate of Helicobacter pylori, higher total effective rate, and lower incidence of adverse reactions. Clarithromycin combined with tinidazole can effectively improve the clinical effect of Helicobacter pylori-related gastritis and reduce the expression level of COX-2.

Tailored susceptibility-guided therapy via gastric juice PCR for the first-line H. pylori eradication, a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Clarithromycin-based standard triple therapy is still commonly adopted by 81.4% of physicians in real-world practice but yields low eradication rates. Therefore, we conducted this study to compare the efficacy of gastric juice-guided therapy for first-line eradication with the standard triple therapy, in order to provide an alternative to real-world practice.

METHODS

A total of 182 treatment-naïve Hp-infected patients were included and randomly allocated to either susceptibility-guided therapy (SGT) with gastric juice PCR or Clarithromycin-based standard triple therapy (STT) for 7 days.

RESULTS

The intention-to-treat eradication rates were 89% (81/91) in SGT and 75.8% in STT (p < 0.031). The per-protocol eradication rates were 91.0% (81/89) in SGT and 79.3% (69/87) in STT (p < 0.034). Among the subgroups of different antibiotic resistance, patients with SGT demonstrated superior eradication rates (91.7% vs 45.5%, p < 0.027) in the subgroup of both clarithromycin resistance and levofloxacin resistance.

CONCLUSION

This prospective randomized controlled trial demonstrated the reliable efficacy of susceptibility-guided therapy via gastric juice PCR for the first-line Hp eradication. In Asia-Pacific area, where standard triple therapy is still adopted by the majority of the physicians, it is a recommended alternative to overcome the increasing antibiotic resistance.

Current status of Helicobacter pylori resistance to Clarithromycin and Levofloxacin in Malaysia-findings from a molecular based study

Background

Resistance to clarithromycin and levofloxacin in Helicobacter pylori which resulted in treatment failures has become a major challenge for physicians worldwide. The resistance is mainly mediated by mutations in a specific domain of the 23S rRNA, gyrA and gyrB genes for clarithromycin and levofloxacin respectively. Hence in this study, we aimed to investigate the current status of H. pylori resistance in our hospital to these two antibiotics based on the molecular approach.

Materials and Methods

Gastric biopsy samples were obtained from treatment-naïve patients. Bacterial genomic DNA was extracted using a commercial kit and continued with DNA amplification using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with specific primers. The PCR amplicons were subjected to sequencing on 23S rRNA gene targeting nucleotide positions at 2,146, 2,147, 2,186 and amino acids at gyrA positions 87 and 91 and gyrB positions 436, 438, 481, 484 to investigate the possible mutations or polymorphisms of genes that lead to clarithromycin and levofloxacin resistance respectively.

Results

Sixty-one urease-positive gastric biopsy samples were studied. The findings revealed the primary resistance rates to clarithromycin was 14.8% and to levofloxacin was 3.3% in our current scenario based on detection of reported resistance-related mutations of A2147G and D91N in 23S rRNA and gyrA genes, respectively. Interestingly, we found a high rate of silent mutations of the gyrA codon 87Asn (32.8%, 20/61) and two polymorphisms of the gyrB D481E (16.4%, 10/61) and R484K (21.3%, 13/61). The role of these polymorphisms in gyrB remained to be elucidated whether the levels of levofloxacin resistance are related to the position/amino acid.

Conclusion

The primary resistance rate of H. pylori to clarithromycin has increased compared to the previous report in Malaysia. Therefore, molecular screening could aid and is important for the selection of antibiotics for H. pylori eradication therapies.

Molecular detection of Helicobacter pylori and clarithromycin resistance in gastric biopsies: a prospective evaluation of RIDA®GENE Helicobacter pylori assay

Background: Empirical treatment of Helicobacter pylori (HP) depends on the local prevalence of clarithromycin resistance but data are lacking and culturing of HP is time-consuming. We evaluated RIDA®GENE Helicobacter pylori assay (r-biopharm), a quantitative PCR assay for detecting HP and clarithromycin resistance mutations in gastric biopsies.Material/methods: Gastric biopsies were obtained from each of 436 consecutive patients referred for gastroscopic investigation and results of qPCR were compared to culture and immunohistochemical staining (IHCS).Results: Of 436 samples, 47 were positive for HP by PCR (11%), 42 by culture (9.7%) and 44 by IHCS (10%). Compared to culture, sensitivity and specificity of the qPCR were 100% and 99%, respectively, and 96% and 99% compared to IHCS. The sensitivity and specificity for clarithromycin resistance detection were 92% and 97%, respectively.Conclusions: RIDA®GENE Helicobacter pylori assay reliably and rapidly detects HP and its resistance to clarithromycin in human gastric biopsies.

A comparative study of 14-day dual therapy (esomeprazole and amoxicillin four times daily) and triple plus bismuth therapy for first-line Helicobacter pylori infection eradication: A randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Favorable outcomes in treating H pylori infection using "dual therapy (proton pump inhibitor and amoxicillin four times daily)" have attracted widespread attention. However, there are few reports, and the study results lack agreement. This study aimed to compare the eradication rate, safety, and compliance of naïve-treatment patients with H pylori infection on "dual therapy" with those on "triple plus bismuth (TPB) therapy."

METHODS

This is a non-inferior randomized controlled trial conducted on 760 patients with H pylori infection. The participants were randomly assigned to two eradication groups: dual therapy (esomeprazole 20 mg and amoxicillin 750 mg four times daily) and TPB therapy (esomeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and bismuth potassium citrate 220 mg twice daily) for 14 days. Safety and compliance were assessed within 3 days after eradication. Urea breath test was performed about 8 weeks after eradication to evaluate outcome. Antibiotic resistance and CYP2C19 polymorphism were determined.

RESULTS

Compared with TPB therapy, dual therapy had significantly higher eradication rates in intention-to-treat (87.1% vs 80.5%, rate difference 6.6%), modified intention-to-treat (90.9% vs 85.5%, 5.5%) and per-protocol (92.4% vs 87.8%, 4.7%) analyses, respectively. Adverse reactions in dual therapy group were significantly lower than TPB therapy group (17.6% vs 25.5%, P = .008), and dual therapy group had better compliance (96.3% vs 92.3%, P = .019). Antibiotic resistance and poor compliance were also associated with treatment failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual therapy (esomeprazole and amoxicillin four times daily) was non-inferior to, and even superior to TPB therapy as first-line H pylori eradication.

Evaluation of Antibiotic Resistance of Helicobacter pylori Strains Isolated in Bari, Southern Italy, in 2017-2018 by Phenotypic and Genotyping Methods

Objective: Helicobacter pylori antibiotic resistance is a constantly evolving process and local surveillance is warranted to guide clinicians in the choice of therapy. Materials and Methods: Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed by E-test on 92 H. pylori strains, and resistance to clarithromycin and levofloxacin was also evaluated using a commercially available genotyping method. Results: In naïve patients the resistance to clarithromycin, levofloxacin, and metronidazole was 37.7%, 26.2%, and 16.4%, respectively, significantly lower than the percentage found in treated patients. Concomitant resistance to ≥2 antibiotics was also observed in naïve patients. The A2143G mutation of the 23S-rRNA gene was the most frequently detected, also in naïve patients. The highest minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)₅₀ value (256 mg/L) was associated with A2142 mutations in all the patients carrying them. For levofloxacin resistance a mutation in codon 87 was detected in 63.9% and in codon 91 in 36.1% of the H. pylori strains, without significant differences in the patients groups. A mutation in codon 87 was associated with the highest MIC₅₀ value (32 mg/L). Conclusions: In our area, a high prevalence of H. pylori primary resistance was detected; these rates were higher in patients who had experienced failure of several courses of therapy. A better knowledge of the local epidemiology of resistance, and the genotypes responsible, will improve the H. pylori eradication rates.

Clarithromycin Versus Metronidazole in First-Line Helicobacter Pylori Triple Eradication Therapy Based on Resistance to Antimicrobial Agents: Meta-Analysis

Background: International treatment guidelines for Helicobacter pylori infection recommend a proton pump inhibitor (PPI)/amoxicillin/clarithromycin (CAM) regimen (PAC) or PPI/amoxicillin/metronidazole (MNZ) regimen (PAM) as first-line therapy based on culture and sensitivity testing. As incidence rates of antimicrobial agent-resistant strains are changing year by year, it is important to reevaluate the efficacy of eradication regimens. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PAC and PAM based on different locations categorized by the reported incidence of CAM- and MNZ-resistant strains. Methods: Randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing eradication rates between PAC and PAM first-line treatment up to December 2018 were included. We divided RCTs into four groups based on resistance to CAM (< 15% or ≥ 15%) and MNZ (< 15% or ≥ 15%). Results: A total of 27 studies (4825 patients) were included. Overall eradication rates between PAC and PAM were similar (74.8% and 72.5%, relative risk (RR): 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91–1.39, P = 0.27) in the intention-to-treat analysis. In areas with low MNZ- and high CAM-resistance rates, PAM had a significantly higher eradication rate than PAC (92.5% vs. 70.8%, RR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.13–0.68). In areas with high MNZ- and low CAM-resistance rates, the eradication rate with PAC was only 72.9%. Conclusions: Overall eradication rates with PAC and PAM were equivalent worldwide. In low MNZ-resistance areas, PAM may be recommended as first-line therapy. However, the efficacy of PAC may be insufficient, irrespective of susceptibility to CAM.

Mutations in the Antibiotic Target Genes Related to Clarithromycin, Metronidazole and Levofloxacin Resistance in Helicobacter pylori Strains from Children in China

Purpose

This study aimed to characterize common mutations of antibiotic-resistant gene of clarithromycin, metronidazole and levofloxacin in Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and determine their association with antibiotic resistance of H. pylori for providing a strategy for eradication therapy of H. pylori infection in children.

Patients and Methods

The antibiotic resistance to clarithromycin, metronidazole and levofloxacin for H. pylori strains isolated from children was determined by E-test. The mutation of domain V of 23S rRNA, rdxA and frxA genes, gyrA and gyrB genes was performed by PCR-based sequencing of DNA fragments.

Results

Out of the 79 H. pylori strains examined, 66 (83.5%) were resistant to at least one of the tested antibiotics and 13 (16.5%) were fully sensitive. A total of 29 (36.7%) strains were resistant to clarithromycin. Analysis of the 23S rRNA gene showed that most mutations occurred at the A2143G and T2182C sites, showing a frequency of 82.8% (24/29) and 89.7% (26/29) respectively. In the 11 sensitive strains to clarithromycin, the frequency of A2143G mutation was only 45.5%, which was significantly lower than that in resistant strains (P<0.05). There were 54 strains (68.4%) resistant to metronidazole, with most mutations occurring at G47A and T184G in the rdxA gene. T184G mutation was recognized in metronidazole-sensitive strains, but no G47A mutation was identified. Twelve strains (15.2%) were resistant to levofloxacin. Position 91 mutation of the gyrA gene occurred only in resistant strains, whereas position 87 mutations were detected in both sensitive and resistant strains to levofloxacin.

Conclusion

In H. pylori resistant strains isolated from children in China, most mutations occurred at A2143G of the 23S rRNA gene for clarithromycin; G47A mutation of rdxA gene for metronidazole; and at 91 mutation of gyrA gene for levofloxacin. It is suggested that susceptibility testing together with screening the mutation of antimicrobial-resistant gene prior to treatment is important for the eradication of H. pylori in children.

Susceptibility-guided therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection treatment failures

BACKGROUND

Empirical therapy of Helicobacter pylori frequently results in treatment failure due to unrecognized antimicrobial resistance. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of susceptibility-guided therapy for rescue treatment of H. pylori infection in China.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of consecutive 200 patients infected with H. pylori with one or more treatment failures. The therapy chosen was susceptibility based using the most effective, best-tolerated regimens first and a locally proven, reliably effective regimen for multidrug-resistant infections. All patients received 14-day triple therapy, i.e. esomeprazole 20 mg and amoxicillin 1 g twice a day plus clarithromycin 500 mg twice a day, metronidazole 400 mg twice a day, or levofloxacin 500 mg daily, or, for multidrug-resistant infections, amoxicillin-containing bismuth quadruple therapy with esomeprazole 20 mg twice a day, bismuth 220 mg twice a day, amoxicillin 1 g three times a day, and metronidazole 400 mg four times a day. Antibiotic resistance was determined by agar dilution.

RESULTS

The eradication rate of susceptibility-guided therapy overall was 94.5% (189/200, 95% confidence interval: 90.4-97.2%). Around 28% (56/200) of patients carried strains susceptible to one of the tested antibiotics and were prescribed the triple therapy. A total of 144 multidrug-resistant patients received bismuth quadruple therapy. The eradication rates were all greater than 90%, i.e. 91.7% (11/12), 92.3% (12/13), and 93.5% (29/31) in those who received clarithromycin, metronidazole, and levofloxacin-containing triple therapy and 95.1% (137/144) for the bismuth quadruple therapy. There were no differences in eradication rates between the subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although susceptibility-guided therapy proved high efficacious despite the high proportion of multidrug-resistant strains, the strategy suggested the best approach for this population would be empirical amoxicillin-containing bismuth quadruple therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03413020.

Intraluminal therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Several strategies have been proposed to increase the eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori. However, the widespread increasing resistance rates to current multiple-dose oral antibiotic therapies call for alternative therapeutic approaches. We aim to develop a novel intraluminal therapy for H. pylori infection (ILTHPI).

METHODS

From April 2017 to December 2017, 100 H. pylori-infected treatment-naïve patients with upper abdominal pain or discomfort underwent endoscopic examinations and concomitant ILTHPI, which comprised the control of intragastric pH, the irrigation of gastric mucosal surface with a mucolytic agent, and the application of single-dose medicaments containing antibiotic powders. The safety profiles while conducting ILTHPI and adverse events after ILTHPI were evaluated. The success of eradication was assessed based on the result of the ¹³ C-urea breath test 6 weeks after ILTHPI. In addition, a patient with successful ILTHPI was reconfirmed by a negative H. pylori stool antigen test four to 6 months after ILTHPI to exclude short-term recurrence.

RESULTS

All the 100 enrolled patients completed the ILTHPI with good safety profiles and mild adverse events (6%). Five patients dropped out, and 51 of 95 patients (53.7%) achieved successful eradication immediately after endoscopic examinations. All 51 patients revealed negative stool H. pylori antigen tests four to 6 months after successful ILTHPI. No short-term recurrence was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed a novel therapeutic approach. With the ILTHPI, H. pylori can be eradicated immediately by administrating a single-dose regimen while conducting an endoscopic examination.

CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER

NCT03124420.

Helicobacter pylori Mutations Detected by Next-Generation Sequencing in Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Gastric Biopsy Specimens Are Associated with Treatment Failure

Helicobacter pylori antibiotic resistance is widespread and increasing worldwide. Routine detection of H. pylori mutations that invoke antimicrobial resistance may be a useful approach to guide antimicrobial therapy and possibly avert treatment failure. In this study, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) gastric biopsy specimens from a cohort of individuals from northern Ohio in the United States were examined using a next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay to detect H. pylori mutations that are known to confer resistance to clarithromycin, levofloxacin, and tetracycline. From January 2016 to January 2017, 133 H. pylori-infected gastric biopsy specimens were identified histologically and subsequently analyzed by NGS to detect mutations in gyrA, 23S rRNA, and 16S rRNA genes. The method successfully detected H. pylori in 126 of 133 cases (95% sensitivity). Mutations conferring resistance were present in 92 cases (73%), including 63 cases with one mutation (50%) and 29 cases with mutations in multiple genes (23%). Treatment outcomes were available in 58 cases. Sixteen of the 58 cases failed therapy (28%). Therapy failure correlated with the number of mutated genes: no failure in cases with no mutations (0/15), 19% (5/27) failure in cases with one gene mutation, and 69% (11/16) failure in cases with more than one mutated gene. Common 23S rRNA mutations (A2142G or A2413G) were present in 88% (14/16) of failed cases as opposed to in only 10% (4/42) of eradicated cases (P < 0.001). This NGS assay can be used on remnant specimens collected during standard-of-care testing to detect mutations that correlate with increased risk of treatment failure. A prospective study is needed to determine if the risk of treatment failure can be decreased by using this assay to guide antibiotic therapy.

Helicobacter pylori: Multiple resistance in patients from Bogotá, Colombia

Introduction: The main cause for Helicobacter pylori infection treatment failure is antibiotic resistance, where clarithromycin and metronidazole play the main role. In Colombia, primary resistance as a consequence of the use of these two antibiotics and excessive levofloxacin use is above the accepted limit (13.6%, 83%, and 16%, respectively). Despite this fact, empirical therapies that include the combination of these antibiotics are used in patients with previous therapeutic failure. Objective: To determine antibiotic resistance in patients previously treated for H. pylori in Bogotá, Colombia. Materials and methods: We conducted a descriptive study that included ten isolates obtained from five patients with three or four previous failed treatments for H. pylori. Antibiotic resistance to amoxicillin, clarithromycin, levofloxacin, and metronidazole was investigated by agar dilution and confirmed by DNA sequencing (Magrogen, Korea). Results: Eight isolates were resistant to two or more antibiotics. All isolates were resistant to levofloxacin. Susceptibility patterns in isolates from the gastric antrum and the body of the stomach were different in three patients. Conclusion: As far as we know, this is the first evidence of multiple H. pylori resistance in Colombia in previously treated patients. Results demonstrated the consequences of using an ineffective antibiotic scheme and the need to assess antibiotic susceptibility in different anatomical sites of the stomach. The consequences of multiple resistance decrease possible antibiotic effectiveness to eradicate H. pylori in the future.

Current antimicrobial susceptibility testing for beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in clinical settings

The worldwide prevalence of beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (BL-E) is increasing. Bacterial infections involving ESBLs can be more difficult to treat because of antibiotic resistance, as there are fewer effective antibiotics left to be used. Moreover, treatment failure is often observed. Thus, quick and accurate identification of β-lactamases is imperative to minimize it. This review article describes most commonly used phenotypic techniques and molecular methods for the detection of ESBLs, acquired AmpC β-lactamases, and carbapenemases produced by Enterobacteriaceae. Phenotypic detection tests remain useful and relevant in clinical laboratories while molecular diagnostic methods are less affordable, more technically demanding, and not standardized. Molecular methods could be used to speed up results of bacterial antibiotic resistance or to clarify the results of phenotypic β-lactamases confirmation tests.

Houston Consensus Conference on Testing for Helicobacter pylori Infection in the United States

Despite guidelines for detection and treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection, recommendations to test patients before and after therapy are commonly not followed in the United States. At the Houston Consensus Conference, 11 experts on management of adult and pediatric patients with H pylori, from different geographic regions of the United States, met to discuss key factors in diagnosis of H pylori infection, including identification of appropriate patients for testing, effects of antibiotic susceptibility on testing and treatment, appropriate methods for confirmation of infection and eradication, and relevant health system considerations. The experts divided into groups that used a modified Delphi panel approach to assess appropriate patients for testing, testing for antibiotic susceptibility and treatment, and test methods and confirmation of eradication. The quality of evidence and strength of recommendations were evaluated using the GRADE system. The results of the individual workshops were presented for a final consensus vote by all panel members. After the Expert Consensus Development meeting, the conclusions were validated by a separate panel of gastroenterologists, who assessed their level of agreement with each of the 29 statements developed at the Expert Consensus Development. The final recommendations are provided, on the basis of the best available evidence, and provide consensus statements with supporting literature to implement testing for H pylori infection at health care systems across the United States.

Impact of primary antibiotic resistance on the effectiveness of sequential therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection: lessons from a 5-year study on a large number of strains

BACKGROUND

The increasing prevalence of strains resistant to antimicrobial agents is a critical issue in the management of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection.

AIMS

(1) To evaluate the prevalence of primary resistance to clarithromycin, metronidazole and levofloxacin (2) to assess the effectiveness of sequential therapy on resistant strains (3) to identify the minimum number of subjects to enrol for evaluating the effectiveness of an eradication regimen in patients harbouring resistant strains.

METHODS

Consecutive 1682 treatment naïve H. pylori-positive patients referred for upper GI endoscopy between 2010 and 2015 were studied and resistances assessed by E-test. Sequential therapy was offered, effectiveness evaluated and analysed.

RESULTS

H. pylori-primary resistance to antimicrobials tested was high, and increased between 2010 and 2015. Eradication rates were (estimates and 95% CIs): 97.3% (95.6-98.4) in strains susceptible to clarithromycin and metronidazole; 96.1% (91.7-98.2) in strains resistant to metronidazole but susceptible to clarithromycin; 93.4% (88.2-96.4) in strains resistant to clarithromycin but susceptible to metronidazole; 83.1% (77.7-87.3) in strains resistant to clarithromycin and metronidazole. For any treatment with a 75%-85% eradication rate, some 98-144 patients with resistant strains need to be studied to get reliable information on effectiveness in these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

H. pylori-primary resistance is increasing and represents the most critical factor affecting effectiveness. Sequential therapy eradicated 83% of strains resistant to clarithromycin and metronidazole. Reliable estimates of the effectiveness of a given regimen in patients harbouring resistant strains can be obtained only by assessing a large number of strains.

IVTH BRAZILIAN CONSENSUS CONFERENCE ON HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION

ABSTRACT Significant progress has been obtained since the III Brazilian Consensus Conference on H. pylori infection held in 2012, in Bento Gonçalves, Brazil, and justify a fourth meeting to establish updated guidelines on the current management of H. pylori infection. Therefore, the Núcleo Brasileiro para Estudo do Helicobacter pylori e Microbiota (NBEHPM), association linked to Brazilian Federation of Gastroenterology (FBG) held its fourth meeting again in Bento Gonçalves, RS, Brazil, on August 25-27, 2017. Twenty-six delegates, including gastroenterologists, endoscopists, and pathologists from the five regions of Brazil as well as one international guest from the United States, participated in the meeting. The participants were invited based on their knowledge and contribution to the study of H. pylori infection. The meeting sought to review different aspects of treatment for infection; establish a correlation between infection, dyspepsia, intestinal microbiota changes, and other disorders with a special emphasis on gastric cancer; and reassess the epidemiological and diagnostic aspects of H. pylori infection. Participants were allocated into four groups as follows: 1) Epidemiology and Diagnosis, 2) Dyspepsia, intestinal microbiota and other afections, 3) Gastric Cancer, and, 4) Treatment. Before the consensus meeting, participants received a topic to be discussed and prepared a document containing a recent literature review and statements that should be discussed and eventually modified during the face-to-face meeting. All statements were evaluated in two rounds of voting. Initially, each participant discussed the document and statements with his group for possible modifications and voting. Subsequently, during a second voting in a plenary session in the presence of all participants, the statements were voted upon and eventually modified. The participants could vote using five alternatives: 1) strongly agree; 2) partially agree; 3) undecided; 4) disagree; and 5) strongly disagree. The adopted consensus index was that 80% of the participants responded that they strongly or partially agreed with each statement. The recommendations reported are intended to provide the most current and relevant evidences to management of H. pylori infection in adult population in Brazil.

Randomized Clinical Trial: Esomeprazole, Bismuth, Levofloxacin, and Amoxicillin or Cefuroxime as First-Line Eradication Regimens for Helicobacter pylori Infection

BACKGROUND

The eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection remains a challenge, especially in the patients unsuitable to take penicillin. Cephalosporin has the potential to replace amoxicillin for H. pylori eradication.

AIMS

To compare the effectiveness, safety, and compliance of amoxicillin- and cefuroxime-containing quadruple regimens in treatment-naïve patients.

METHODS

In this open-label randomized control study, 400 patients with H. pylori infection were divided into amoxicillin-containing (esomeprazole 20 mg twice/day, amoxicillin 1000 mg twice/day, levofloxacin 500 mg once/day, and bismuth 220 mg twice/day for 14 days) or cefuroxime-containing (esomeprazole 20 mg twice/day, cefuroxime 500 mg twice/day, levofloxacin 500 mg once/day, and bismuth 220 mg twice/day for 14 days) quadruple therapy groups. The safety and compliance were assessed 1-3 days after eradication. Urea breath test was performed 8-12 weeks after eradication to determine treatment outcome.

RESULTS

The baseline data including antibiotic resistance were well matched between the two groups. The eradication rates between amoxicillin- and cefuroxime-containing quadruple therapy groups were not significantly different [intention-to-treat analysis: 83.5% (95% confidence interval 78.3-88.7%) vs. 81.0% (75.5-86.5%), P = 0.513; modified intention-to-treat analysis: 90.3% (86.0-94.6%) vs. 88.5% (83.9-93.2%), P = 0.586; per-protocol analysis: 91.6% (87.5-95.7%) vs. 89.8% (85.3-94.3%), P = 0.560]. The incidence of adverse effects (18.4 vs. 20.1%, P = 0.678) and compliance (94.7 vs. 94.2%, P = 0.813) were also similar. Variate analyses showed that antibiotic resistance and poor compliance were the independent risk factors for eradication failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Esomeprazole, bismuth, levofloxacin, and amoxicillin or cefuroxime achieved similar and relatively satisfactory cure rates, safety, and compliance in first-line H. pylori eradication. Cefuroxime may be a good alternative medicine for eradication instead of amoxicillin for the patients unsuitable to take penicillin.

A Novel Stool PCR Test for Helicobacter pylori May Predict Clarithromycin Resistance and Eradication of Infection at a High Rate

Clarithromycin-based regimens are commonly used as a first-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori-positive patients; however, resistance to clarithromycin has led to treatment failures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using stool samples to detect the presence of H. pylori DNA while concurrently detecting mutations associated with resistance to clarithromycin. For this purpose, total DNA was extracted from 294 raw stool specimens from H. pylori-positive and -negative patients. TaqMan real-time PCR amplification was used to detect the presence of H. pylori as well as to predict the phenotype of the organism and the related outcome for patients treated with clarithromycin. Clarithromycin resistance was determined upon analysis of the PCR result. Patients were also tested by a urea breath test and were subjected to esophagogastroduodenoscopy, followed by histology, culture, and a rapid urease test, in order to obtain a consensus patient infection status. Of 294 total stool samples, 227 were deemed true positive. The sensitivity of H. pylori detection by PCR was 93.8%. Of 213 true-positive samples that were sequenced, 36.2% showed point mutations associated with clarithromycin resistance (A2142C, A2142G, A2143G). The final correlation of the mutant genotypes as determined by sequencing with the eradication of infection was 86%. We found that Helicobacter pylori DNA can be detected in human stool specimens with high sensitivity and can therefore be used to determine the presence of the bacterium without obtaining a biopsy sample. Moreover, genotypic resistance to clarithromycin can be predicted without obtaining a biopsy sample, facilitating the choice of the right therapeutic approach.

The Irish Helicobacter pylori Working Group consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of H. pylori infection in adult patients in Ireland

BACKGROUND

Irish eradication rates for Helicobacter pylori are decreasing and there is an increase in the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. These trends call into question current management strategies.

OBJECTIVE

To establish an Irish Helicobacter pylori Working Group (IHPWG) to assess, revise and tailor current available recommendations.

METHODS

Experts in the areas of gastroenterology and microbiology were invited to join the IHPWG. Questions of relevance to diagnosis, first-line and rescue therapy were developed using the PICO system. A literature search was performed. The 'Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation' approach was then used to rate the quality of available evidence and grade the resulting recommendations.

RESULTS

Key resultant IHPWG statements (S), the strength of recommendation and quality of evidence include S8: standard triple therapy for 7 days' duration can no longer be recommended (strong and moderate). S9: 14 days of clarithromycin-based triple therapy with a high-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is recommended as first-line therapy. Bismuth quadruple therapy for 14 days is an alternative if available (strong and moderate). S12: second-line therapy depends on the first-line treatment and should not be the same treatment. The options are (a) 14 days of levofloxacin-based therapy with high-dose PPI, (b) 14 days of clarithromycin-based triple therapy with high-dose PPI or (c) bismuth quadruple therapy for 14 days (strong and moderate). S13: culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing should be performed following two treatment failures (weak and low/very low).

CONCLUSION

These recommendations are intended to provide the most relevant current best-practice guidelines for the management of H. pylori infection in adults in Ireland.

Importance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing for the management of eradication in Helicobacter pylori infection

The management of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection treatment differs from the common treatment protocol for other infectious diseases. Because culture- or molecular-guided approaches face several practical issues, such as the invasive procedures required to obtain gastric biopsy specimens and the lack of availability of routine laboratory testing in some places, H. pylori treatment includes the administration of two or three empirically selected antibiotics combined with a proton pump inhibitor rather than evidence-based eradication treatment. The efficacy of empirical therapy is decreasing, mostly due to increasing multiple resistance. Multiresistance to levofloxacin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole, which are commonly used in empirical treatments, appears to have increased in many countries. Mutations play a primary role in the antimicrobial resistance of H. pylori, but many different mechanisms can be involved in the development of antibiotic resistance. Determining and understanding these possible mechanisms might allow the development of new methods for the detection of H. pylori and the determination of antimicrobial resistance. A treatment based on the detection of antimicrobial resistance is usually more effective than empirical treatment. Nevertheless, such an approach before treatment is still not recommended in the Maastricht guidelines due to the difficulty associated with the routine application of available culture- or molecular-based susceptibility tests, which are usually administered in cases of treatment failure. The management of first and rescue treatments requires further research due to the steadily increase in antimicrobial resistance.

Noninvasive molecular analysis of Helicobacter pylori: Is it time for tailored first-line therapy?

The main problem of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection management is linked to antibiotic resistances. This phenomenon has grown in the last decade, inducing a dramatic decline in conventional regimen effectiveness. The causes of resistance are point mutations in bacterial DNA, which interfere with antibiotic mechanism of action, especially clarithromycin and levofloxacin. Therefore, international guidelines have recently discouraged their use in areas with a relevant resistance percentage, suggesting first-line schedules with expected high eradication rates, i.e., bismuth containing or non-bismuth quadruple therapies. These regimens require the daily assumption of a large number of tablets. Consequently, a complete adherence is expected only in subjects who may be motivated by the presence of major disorders. However, an incomplete adherence to antibiotic therapies may lead to resistance onset, since sub-inhibitory concentrations could stimulate the selection of resistant mutants. Of note, a recent meta-analysis suggests that susceptibility tests may be more useful for the choice of first than second-line or rescue treatment. Additionally, susceptibility guided therapy has been demonstrated to be highly effective and superior to empiric treatments by both meta-analyses and recent clinical studies. Conventional susceptibility test is represented by culture and antibiogram. However, the method is not available everywhere mainly for methodology-related factors and fails to detect hetero-resistances. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based, culture-free techniques on gastric biopsy samples are accurate in finding even minimal traces of genotypic resistant strains and hetero-resistant status by the identification of specific point mutations. The need for an invasive endoscopic procedure has been the most important limit to their spread. A further step has, moreover, been the detection of point mutations in bacterial DNA fecal samples. Few studies on clarithromycin susceptibility have shown an overall high sensitivity and specificity when compared with culture or PCR on gastric biopsies. On these bases, two commercial tests are now available although they have shown some controversial findings. A novel PCR method showed a full concordance between tissue and stool results in a preliminary experience. In conclusion, despite poor validation, there is increasing evidence of a potential availability of noninvasive investigations able to detect H. pylori resistances to antibiotics. These kinds of analysis are currently at a very early phase of development and caution should be paid about their clinical application. Only further studies aimed to evaluate their sensitivity and specificity will afford novel data for solid considerations. Nevertheless, noninvasive molecular tests may improve patient compliance, time/cost of infection management and therapeutic outcome. Moreover, the potential risk of a future increase of resistance to quadruple regimens as a consequence of their use on large scale and incomplete patient adherence could be avoided.

Clarithromycin resistance in Helicobacter pylori and its molecular determinants in Northern Spain, 2013-2015

OBJECTIVES

Clarithromycin resistance (CLR-R) is the main reason for failure of Helicobacter pylori infection treatment, which is frequently empirically prescribed due to the erroneous belief that culture for susceptibility testing is difficult. The aim of this study was to determine CLR-R in a region of southern Europe and to evaluate the utility of a PCR sequencing assay applied on gastroduodenal biopsies in detecting H. pylori and clarithromycin (CLR) susceptibility.

METHODS

The susceptibility of all H. pylori isolates obtained by culture during 2013-2015 was determined by Etest. During 2014-2015, H. pylori detection and CLR susceptibility were also studied by PCR followed by sequencing performed on gastroduodenal biopsies. Point mutations in the 23S rRNA gene were studied in all CLR-resistant isolates in 2014.

RESULTS

Of 1986 H. pylori isolates obtained by culture (63 from children and 1923 from adults), 349 (17.6%) were CLR-resistant [21/63 (33.3%) in children and 328/1923 (17.1%) in adults; P<0.001], of which 31.5% were also resistant to levofloxacin. The main mutations detected were A2147G (79.8%), A2146G (17.2%) and A2146C (2%). Concordance between the PCR sequencing assay on biopsies and CLR susceptibility by Etest after culture was 89.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

CLR-R was high in Gipuzkoa, northern Spain. The molecular PCR method performed directly on biopsies was a good alternative to the traditional Etest susceptibility method and was an aid when culture was non-viable.

Molecular detection of Helicobacter pylori antibiotic resistance in stool vs biopsy samples

AIM

To compare (1) demographics in urea breath test (UBT) vs endoscopy patients; and (2) the molecular detection of antibiotic resistance in stool vs biopsy samples.

METHODS

Six hundred and sixteen adult patients undergoing endoscopy or a UBT were prospectively recruited to the study. The GenoType HelicoDR assay was used to detect Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and antibiotic resistance using biopsy and/or stool samples from CLO-positive endoscopy patients and stool samples from UBT-positive patients.

RESULTS

Infection rates were significantly higher in patients referred for a UBT than endoscopy (overall rates: 33% vs 19%; treatment-naïve patients: 33% vs 14.7%, respectively). H. pylori-infected UBT patients were younger than H. pylori-infected endoscopy patients (41.4 vs 48.4 years, respectively, P < 0.005), with a higher percentage of H. pylori-infected males in the endoscopy-compared to the UBT-cohort (52.6% vs 33.3%, P = 0.03). The GenoType HelicoDR assay was more accurate at detecting H. pylori infection using biopsy samples than stool samples [98.2% (n = 54/55) vs 80.3% (n =53/66), P < 0.005]. Subset analysis using stool and biopsy samples from CLO-positive endoscopy patients revealed a higher detection rate of resistance-associated mutations using stool samples compared to biopsies. The concordance rates between stool and biopsy samples for the detection of H. pylori DNA, clarithromycin and fluoroquinolone resistance were just 85%, 53% and 35%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Differences between endoscopy and UBT patients provide a rationale for non-invasive detection of H. pylori antibiotic resistance. However, the GenoType HelicoDR assay is an unsuitable approach.

Helicobacter pylori Eradication with Proton Pump Inhibitors or Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers: The Effect of Clarithromycin Resistance

BACKGROUND

Vonoprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) recently approved for Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in Japan.

AIMS

To compare PPI- and P-CAP-containing triple therapy and vonoprazan-based triple therapy.

METHODS

Two hundred ninety-five initial subjects received a PPI-containing triple therapy; the next 125 subjects received vonoprazan-containing triple therapy. Two sequential groups received 7-day eradication regimens consisting of amoxicillin 750 mg, clarithromycin 200 mg both twice a day with standard dose PPI or vonoprazan (20 mg) each twice daily. H. pylori eradication was confirmed by a 13C-UBT. Clarithromycin susceptibility was evaluated by 23S rRNA PCR.

RESULTS

Population cure rates with clarithromycin susceptible strains were 89.6 versus 100 % for PPI and vonoprazan therapies, respectively. Cure rates with resistant strains were 40.2 % with PPI therapy versus 76.1 % with vonoprazan triple therapy. There was no difference in side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Although 7-day P-CAB triple therapy was superior to 7-day PPI triple therapy, neither was highly effective, or can be recommended, in the presence of clarithromycin-resistant infections.

Detection of Helicobacter pylori resistance to clarithromycin and fluoroquinolones in Brazil: A national survey

AIM

To evaluate bacterial resistance to clarithromycin and fluoroquinolones in Brazil using molecular methods.

METHODS

The primary antibiotic resistance rates of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) were determined from November 2012 to March 2015 in the Southern, South-Eastern, Northern, North-Eastern, and Central-Western regions of Brazil. Four hundred ninety H. pylori patients [66% female, mean age 43 years (range: 18-79)] who had never been previously treated for this infection were enrolled. All patients underwent gastroscopy with antrum and corpus biopsies and molecular testing using GenoType HelicoDR (Hain Life Science, Germany). This test was performed to detect the presence of H. pylori and to identify point mutations in the genes responsible for clarithromycin and fluoroquinolone resistance. The molecular procedure was divided into three steps: DNA extraction from the biopsies, multiplex amplification, and reverse hybridization.

RESULTS

Clarithromycin resistance was found in 83 (16.9%) patients, and fluoroquinolone resistance was found in 66 (13.5%) patients. There was no statistical difference in resistance to either clarithromycin or fluoroquinolones (P = 0.55 and P = 0.06, respectively) among the different regions of Brazil. Dual resistance to clarithromycin and fluoroquinolones was found in 4.3% (21/490) of patients. The A2147G mutation was present in 90.4% (75/83), A2146G in 16.9% (14/83) and A2146C in 3.6% (3/83) of clarithromycin-resistant patients. In 10.8% (9/83) of clarithromycin-resistant samples, more than 01 mutation in the 23S rRNA gene was noticed. In fluoroquinolone-resistant samples, 37.9% (25/66) showed mutations not specified by the GenoType HelicoDR test. D91N mutation was observed in 34.8% (23/66), D91G in 18.1% (12/66), N87K in 16.6% (11/66) and D91Y in 13.6% (9/66) of cases. Among fluoroquinolone-resistant samples, 37.9% (25/66) showed mutations not specified by the GenoType HelicoDR test.

CONCLUSION

The H. pylori clarithromycin resistance rate in Brazil is at the borderline (15%-20%) for applying the standard triple therapy. The fluoroquinolone resistance rate (13.5%) is equally concerning.

Management of Helicobacter pylori infections

BACKGROUND

Infection with Helicobacter pylori is associated with severe digestive diseases including chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer disease, and gastric cancer. Successful eradication of this common gastric pathogen in individual patients is known to prevent the occurrence of peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer.

DISCUSSION

With half of the world's population being infected with H, pylori and only few antibiotics result in an effective eradication, a successful antibiotic driven worldwide eradication program seems unlikely. In addition, H. pylori eradication is not always beneficial as it has been described that eradication can be associated with an increased frequency of other disorders such as pediatric asthma, inflammatory bowel diseases and Barrett's Esophagus. We have to accept that eradication of this infection is a two-edged sword that is both useful and harmful and we should therefore focus our H. pylori eradication policy toward selectively identify and destroy only the virulent strains.

CONCLUSION

In order to still be able to effectively treat H. pylori infections in the future we need an alternative diagnostic/treatment algorithm. This would involve a shift towards more precise and enhanced disease predicting diagnosis that tries to identify patients with chance of developing severe diseases such as gastric cancer, rather than the current regime that is geared towards find and destroy all H. pylori.

Occurrence of Mutations in the Antimicrobial Target Genes Related to Levofloxacin, Clarithromycin, and Amoxicillin Resistance in Helicobacter pylori Isolates from Buenos Aires City

Domain V of 23S rRNA, gyrA and gyrB Quinolones Resistance-Determining Region (QRDR), and pbp-1A gene point mutations were investigated in Helicobacter pylori-resistant isolates from three centres of Buenos Aires. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were performed in 197 isolates from 52 H. pylori-positive naive patients by agar dilution method. Point mutations were achieved by amplification and sequencing of the target genes, and their association with resistance was determined by natural transformation assays. Resistance rates were as follows: metronidazole 28.8%, clarithromycin (CLA) 26.9%, levofloxacin (LEV) 32.7%, and amoxicillin (AMX) 7.6%. Nearly one-third of patients carried multidrug-resistant isolates. A2143G or A2142G in domain V of 23S-rRNA was found in all isolates showing high level of resistance to CLA (MIC >2 mg/L), accounting for 76.0% (38/50) of those with the resistant phenotype. The mutations A2267G or T1861C carried by 8/12 isolates with MIC 1-2 mg/L (low level) did not confer resistance by transformation. Substitutions at GyrA position 87 or 91, mainly N87K and D91G, were found in 92.8% (52/56) of the LEV-resistant isolates: 48 isolates with MIC 4-64 mg/L and 4/8 isolates with MIC 2 mg/L. The remaining four harboured K133N, also present in susceptible isolates. None of the substitutions in GyrB demonstrated to confer resistance. Transformation proved that PBP-1A N562Y and/or T556S substitutions confer the AMX resistance in our isolates, showing an additive effect. In conclusion, the usually reported mutations related to CLA, LEV, and AMX resistance were found in our isolates. However, low-level CLA resistance seems not to be due to mutations in Domain V of 23S rRNA gene.

Failed Eradication for Helicobacter pylori. What Should Be Done?

Failed eradication of Helicobacter pylori occurs when the antibiotic concentration at the site where H. pylori is located is lower than the minimal inhibitory concentration of the antibiotic for this bacterium. The main reason for this is the acquisition of resistance; and in the context of the most common treatment, the main reason is the acquisition of resistance to clarithromycin. Several options can then be followed. The most rational option is to use a tailored therapy, that is, to look for clarithromycin resistance either by culture plus antibiogram or by a molecular method. The standard triple therapy is used only in the case of clarithromycin susceptibility. In case of resistance or if an empiric treatment must be given, a good option is to use a bismuth-based quadruple therapy. If unavailable, clarithromycin-based quadruple therapies can be used either as sequential or 'concomitant' or hybrid. The limit, especially for concomitant therapy, is the use of clarithromycin, which will be inactive in about 2/3 of the cases, adding to cost and adverse events. Recently, the dual therapy proton pump inhibitor-amoxicillin has been revisited especially in the Far East, and increasing the dose and the frequency of administration gives excellent results.

Helicobacter pylori therapy: a paradigm shift

Helicobacter pylori (H. Pylori) is a leading cause of gastroduodenal disease, including gastric cancer. H. pylori eradication therapies and their efficacy are summarized. A number of current treatment regimens will reliably yield >90% or 95% cure rates with susceptible strains. None has proven to be superior. We show how to predict the efficacy of a regimen in any population provided one knows the prevalence of antibiotic resistance. As with other infectious diseases, therapy should always be susceptibility-based. Susceptibility testing should be demanded. We provide recommendations for empiric therapies when that is the only option and describe how to distinguish studies providing misinformation from those providing reliable and interpretable data. When treated as an infectious disease, high H. pylori cure rates are relatively simple to reliably achieve.