Immunologic Monitoring to Personalize Immunosuppression After Liver Transplant

Overview of therapeutic drug monitoring and clinical practice

With the rapid development of clinical pharmacy in China, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has become an essential tool for guiding rational clinical drug use and is widely concerned. TDM is a tool that combines pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic knowledge to optimize personalized drug therapy, which can improve treatment outcomes, reduce drug-drug toxicity, and avoid the risk of developing drug resistance. To effectively implement TDM, accurate and sophisticated analytical methods are required. By researching the literature published in recent years, we summarize the types of commonly monitored drugs, therapeutic windows, and clinical assays and track the trends and hot spots of therapeutic drug monitoring. The purpose is to provide guidelines for clinical blood drug concentration monitoring, to implement individualized drug delivery programs better, to ensure the rational use of drugs for patients, and to provide a reference for the group to carry out related topics in the future.

Immunosuppression Monitoring-What Clinician Needs to Know?

The liver is well known for its immunotolerance, but rejection without immunosuppression is frequently encountered post liver transplantation, especially in humans.1 Indeed, the amount of immunosuppression required post liver transplant is less compared to other organ transplants like kidney, heart, and intestine.2 Reports of successful weaning of immunosuppression have been reported but are not practiced for fear of unwanted alloimmune response leading to rejection. Life-long immunosuppression is needed in most patients for graft survival but is associated with side effects like renal dysfunction, metabolic abnormalities, or risk of de novo malignancies. Also, the appropriate dose of immunosuppression to achieve adequate graft function and prevention of toxicities is very important. One shoe does not fit all. There are significant individual variations in response and side effect profile. Also, the level of immunosuppression varies with the underlying liver disease like autoimmune disease requires higher immunosuppression. Thus, monitoring the adequate immunosuppression with the minimization of drug toxicity is imperative post-transplant. Unfortunately, the current methods for immunosuppression monitoring rely on testing the immunosuppressive drug levels rather than the immune system activity. We have discussed the concept of alloreactivity, available methods of immunosuppression and drug monitoring and investigational methods in this review.

Recent advances in precision medicine for individualized immunosuppression

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The current tools to proactively guide and individualize immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation are limited. Despite continued improvements in posttransplant outcomes, the adverse effects of over-immunosuppression or under-immunosuppression are common. The present review is intended to highlight recent advances in individualized immunosuppression.

RECENT FINDINGS

There has been a great focus on genomic information to predict drug dose requirements, specifically on single nucleotide polymorphisms of CYP3A5 and ABCB1. Furthermore, biomarker studies have developed ways to better predict clinical outcomes, such as graft rejection.

SUMMARY

The integration of advanced computing tools, such as artificial neural networks and machine learning, with genome sequencing has led to intriguing findings on individual or group-specific dosing requirements. Rapid computing allows for processing of data and discovering otherwise undetected clinical patterns. Genetic polymorphisms of CYP3A5 and ABCB1 have yielded results to suggest varying dose requirements correlated with race and sex. Newly proposed biomarkers offer precise and noninvasive ways to monitor patient's status. Cell-free DNA quantitation is increasingly explored as an indicator of allograft injury and rejection, which can help avoid unneeded biopsies and more frequently monitor graft function.