Le ganglion sentinelle sans curage systématique dans le cancer du sein : bilan d'une expérience de 1000 interventions

[Breast ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion: pathological review and clinical implications]

PURPOSE

Recent improvements in the detection of breast cancer at an early stage have resulted in a rising incidence of breast ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion. So far, there is no consensus regarding its optimal management. We hereby report on our 10-year single institutional experience in breast ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion including pathological reviewing.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All consecutive patients treated for a ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion at the Institut Claudius-Regaud (Toulouse, France) over a 10-year period were included in this study. We reviewed all available histological materials.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients were eligible for this study. Two patients presented with a lymph node invasion at diagnosis. Each patient benefited from initial surgical management, which consisted either in mastectomy (n=25) or conservative resection (n=37). Axillary exploration was performed in 52 patients (82%). After a median follow-up of 61.3 months [46.9;69], the 5-year overall survival and disease free survival were 98.2 (95% CI=[88.2;99.7]) and 89.5% (95% CI=[76.3;95.6]) respectively. Two delayed invasive relapses occurred leading to one specific death. The pathological review highlighted a trend towards a loss of HR and HER2 expression (9%) in the microinvasive component in comparison with its surrounded in situ carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

The risk of initial lymph node involvement and delayed invasive local relapse deserve an optimal locoregional management including lymph node evaluation. The non-negligible discrepancy's rate between in situ and microinvasive components justifies HR status and HER2 expression assessment on the microinvasive component.

Utility of intraoperative frozen section examination of sentinel lymph nodes in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative frozen section (IFS) examination of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) is useful in selecting patients with invasive breast cancer for immediate axillary lymph node dissection. However, whether IFS evaluation of the SLNs in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast has any value has not been previously assessed.

METHODS

Clinicopathologic data from patients with DCIS who underwent resection with SLN biopsy (2004-2010) were collected to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of IFS, and its impact on axillary management.

RESULTS

A total of 267 patients with DCIS underwent resection with SLN biopsy and IFS evaluation. Preoperative pathology was DCIS (n = 231), DCIS with microinvasion (n = 24), and DCIS with other lesions (n = 12). Fifty-two (19.5%) patients had invasive breast cancer on final pathology. SLN metastases were identified in 13 (4.8%) patients; however, only 4 (1.5%) were IFS positive. IFS examination was negative in 263 (98.5%) patients. Among patients with SLN metastases, the most common pattern of metastases was either micrometastasis (n = 6) or immunohistochemistry-positive individual tumor cells (n = 4), whereas 3 patients had a macrometastasis. IFS examination was falsely negative in 9 of these 13 patients for a false-negative rate of 69.3%, and a sensitivity and specificity of 31% and 100% respectively. Nine of the 13 patients underwent axillary lymph node dissection and only 1 patient had further axillary metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

SLN metastases in DCIS is rare and most commonly involves SLN micrometastasis or immunohistochemistry-positive individual tumor cells. SLN IFS evaluation in DCIS has a low yield and sensitivity, and can be safely omitted to reduce operative duration and cost.

[Intraoperative molecular assessment of sentinel nodes in the breast cancer using the Gene Search BLN Assay technique: our experience about 126 patients]

INTRODUCTION

Intraoperative molecular assay Gene Search BLN Assay (BLN) detects sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis in breast cancer. Our objective was to compare BLN to the definitive conventional histologic methods and to experiment the management of BLN in routine.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Each SLN was cut into alternate slabs. Half slabs were analysed with the intraoperative BLN molecular method, and the other slabs with the definitive histologic method.

RESULTS

Two hundred and thirty four SLN have been analysed (124 patients). Thirty-five SLN had metastasis for 29 patients (23.4%). BLN correctly identified 28 patients. Two cases of discordance between BLN and standard method were found, probably explained by a sample bias. The sensibility of BLN is 96.4%, the sensitivity is 99%, the predictive positive value is 96.4%, the predictive negative value is 99% and the concordance is 98.4%. The surgery time increases and there is a need to adapt the theatre organization accordingly.

CONCLUSION

The Gene Search BLN Assay gives a great interest for the patient, the surgeon and the pathologist because it increases the quality of the intraoperative analysis by comparison with the intraoperative conventional histology.

Cancer canalaire in situ du sein avec micro-invasion. Place du ganglion sentinelle

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy for microinvasive ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2001 to January 2006, lymphatic mapping was performed using radiocolloid and/or blue dye technique. Full axillary lymph node dissection was accomplished systematically in 10 instances at the beginning of the study, and furthermore when the sentinel node was involved (macrometastatic or micrometastatic disease).

RESULTS

Identification rate was 98% (40/41), the unsuccessful procedure occurred after incisional biopsy for diagnosis. The number of sentinel nodes removed was 2 in average (1-5). Sentinel node involvement was found in 10% of cases (4/40): 1 sentinel node macrometastasis pN1, 2 sentinel node micrometastases determined by hematoxylin and eosin staining pN1 (mi), 1 sentinel node micrometastasis detected only by immunohistochemical staining pN0 (mi).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Sentinel lymph node sampling should not be currently applied for management of every ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast but a selective utilization is proposed in documented high risk subset of patients according to clinical, mammographic, and histologic features obtained by percutaneous biopsies. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with proved or suspected microinvasion could be scheduled for sentinel node procedure a fortiori in cases undergoing mastectomy because of extensive DCIS before the occurrence of disturbances of lymphatic drainage induced by surgical breast dissection.

Is there an indication for sentinel node biopsy in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast? A review

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is defined as a proliferation of malignant epithelial cells within breast ducts without evidence of invasion through the basement membrane. The detection rate of DCIS of the breast has dramatically increased since the mid-1980s as the result of the widespread use of screening mammography. DCIS currently represents about 15-25% of all breast cancers detected in population screening programmes. Although inherently a non-invasive disease, occult invasion with the potential of lymph node metastases may occur. Where performing an axillary lymph node dissection-or-not for DCIS used to be an important dilemma, the same now holds for the sentinel node biopsy. This article reviews the potential role of the sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in patients with DCIS. We conclude that based on the current literature, there is in general no role for a SNB in DCIS. A SNB should only be considered in patients with an excisional biopsy diagnosis of high risk DCIS (grade III with palpable mass or large tumour area by imaging) as well as in patients undergoing mastectomy after a core or excisional biopsy diagnosis of DCIS, although SNB may be contraindicated in many of the latter patients because of lesion size and/or multifocality. Even in these patients the value of a positive SN, containing mostly isolated tumour cells, is questionable.

[Is there still a place for extemporaneous exam in breast cancer?]

OBJECTIVE

The rise of preoperative diagnosis thanks to new methods of micro and macrobiopsy and the development of sentinel lymph node have dramatically modified the surgical management of patients with breast tumor. The purpose of this study is to know if extemporaneous exams still have a place in the management of breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective study which compares the qualitiative evolution of frozen sections in breast tumor at Jean-Perrin center before the practice of percutaneous strereotaxic biopsy and after the training of sentinel lymph node operative biopsy.

RESULTS

The results were in favour of a different distribution of anatomocytopathological activity with a decrease of frozen section in breast tumor and an increase of cytological imprints on sentinel nodes.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The interest of histologic preoperative diagnosis and the failure of consensus in the sentinel lymph node just leave a restrictive position to frozen section in breast cancer.