Prise en charge des lymphocèles après curage axillaire dans le cancer du sein

Reducing the incidence of problematic seroma formation and skin necrosis post-lymphadenectomy: Triple action of topical tranexamic acid, negative pressure wound therapy, and prolonged drainage

BACKGROUND

Axillary and inguinal lymph node dissections are commonly associated with complications that often require additional interventions.

METHODS

Patients who underwent axillary or inguinal lymphadenectomy via standard procedures were compared to an intervention cohort of patients who underwent axillary or inguinal lymphadenectomy with the use of topical tranexamic acid (TXA) to the wound cavity, a PICO (Smith&Nephew UK) closed-incision negative pressure dressing, and discharged early with a drain in-situ.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients in the control group (mean age 65.8 years, mean BMI 28.4 kg/m2) underwent open lymphadenectomy without topical TXA and a simple dressing. Seventy-eight patients were included in the intervention group (mean age 67.1 years, mean BMI 28.5 kg/m2). Patients in the intervention group had an inpatient stay of mean 5.6 days fewer than those in the control group (CI 3.09-5.31; p < .0001), an estimated saving to the healthcare trust of £ 3046.40 (US$3723.61) per patient in "bed days." They had longer drain duration (mean 15 days vs. 8.3 days); however, they had a statistically significant lower risk of seroma formation requiring drainage (6.4% vs. 21%; p = .009), and skin necrosis (0% vs. 6.6%; p = .027). They also had a lower risk of infection (17% vs. 29%), wound dehiscence (15% vs. 25%), and readmission (7.7% vs. 14%), although they were not statistically significant. Patients in the control group were more likely to receive antibiotics as inpatients (51% vs. 7.7%; p < .00001) and on discharge (24% vs. 5%; p < .0011) than those in the intervention group.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical TXA, PICO dressing, and early discharge with a drain following lymphadenectomy results in a reduced rate of complications.

The QUILT study: quilting sutures in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery: a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial study

BACKGROUND

Seroma is the most common complication following breast cancer surgery, with reported incidence up to 90%. Seroma causes patient discomfort, is associated with surgical site infections (SSI), often requires treatment and increases healthcare consumption. The quilting suture technique, in which the skin flaps are sutured to the pectoralis muscle, leads to a significant reduction of seroma with a decrease in the number of aspirations and surgical site infections. However, implementation is lagging due to unknown side effects, increase in operation time and cost effectiveness. Main objective of this study is to assess the impact of large scale implementation of the quilting suture technique in patients undergoing mastectomy and/or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND).

METHODS

The QUILT study is a stepped wedge design study performed among nine teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. The study consists of nine steps, with each step one hospital will implement the quilting suture technique. Allocation of the order of implementation will be randomization-based. Primary outcome is 'textbook outcome', i.e.no wound complications, no re-admission, re-operation or unscheduled visit to the outpatient clinic and no increased use of postoperative analgesics. A total of 113 patients is required based on a sample size calculation. Secondary outcomes are shoulder function, cosmetic outcome, satisfaction with thoracic wall and health care consumption. Follow-up lasts for 6 months.

DISCUSSION

This will be one of the first multicentre prospective studies in which quilting without postoperative wound drain is compared with conventional wound closure. We hypothesize that quilting is a simple technique to increase textbook outcome, enhance patient comfort and reduce health care consumption.

Efficacy and safety of surgical energy devices for axillary node dissection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Various surgical energy devices are used for axillary lymph-node dissection. However, those that reduce seroma during axillary lymph-node dissection are unknown. We aimed to determine the best surgical energy device for reducing seroma by performing a network meta-analysis to synthesize the current evidence on the effectiveness of surgical energy devices for axillary node dissection for breast cancer patients. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Platform Search Portal. Two reviewers independently selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing (EBVS), ultrasonic coagulation shears (UCS), and conventional techniques for axillary node dissection. Primary outcomes were seroma, drained fluid volume (mL), and drainage duration (days). We analyzed random-effects and Bayesian network meta-analyses. We evaluated the confidence of each outcome using the CINeMA tool. We registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022335434). We included 34 RCTs with 2916 participants. Compared to the conventional techniques, UCS likely reduces seroma (risk ratio [RR], 0.61; 95% credible interval [CrI], 0.49-0.73), the drained fluid volume (mean difference [MD], - 313 mL; 95% CrI - 496 to - 130), and drainage duration (MD - 1.79 days; 95% CrI - 2.91 to - 0.66). EBVS might have little effect on seroma, the drained fluid volume, and drainage duration compared to conventional techniques. UCS likely reduce seroma (RR 0.44; 95% CrI 0.28-0.69) compared to EBVS. Confidence levels were low to moderate. In conclusion, UCS are likely the best surgical energy device for seroma reduction during axillary node dissection for breast cancer patients.

Quilting following mastectomy reduces seroma, associated complications and health care consumption without impairing patient comfort

Background

An important complication following mastectomy is seroma formation. Quilting, in which skin flaps are sutured to the underlying muscle, is reported to reduce seroma incidence, but might induce pain and impair shoulder function. Main objective is to compare quilting with conventional wound closure, regarding seroma incidence, health care consumption, and patient discomfort.

Methods

In a combined prospective and retrospective study, 254 patients undergoing mastectomy and/or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) were included. Patients received quilting sutures or conventional closure. Primary outcome was clinical significant seroma (CSS). In prospectively included patients shoulder function and analgesic use was observed.

Results

CSS incidence was 12.9% in the quilted versus 62.3% in the nonquilted cohort (p < 0.001). Surgical site infections were reported significantly less in the quilted cohort. Duration of hospital stay was shorter and outpatient clinic visits were less in the quilted cohort. Surgical procedure required 10 additional minutes for quilting. No significant differences were observed in postoperative shoulder function and analgesic use.

Conclusion

Quilting following mastectomy reduces CSS incidence. Quilting requires 10 additional minutes during surgery. It facilitates day treatment and results in less additional outpatient clinic visits culminating in reduced health care consumption. Shoulder function and pain are not affected by quilting.

Effect of Myofascial Therapy on Pain and Functionality of the Upper Extremities in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

(1) Objective: The purpose was to analyze the effectiveness of myofascial therapy on musculoskeletal pain and functionality of the upper extremities in female breast cancer survivors, and to evaluate the changes in range of motion, quality of life, and mood state of these patients. (2) Methods: Systematic searches were performed on the MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Physiotherapy Evidence Databases for articles published until October 2020, in order to identify randomized controlled trials which analyzed the effectiveness of myofascial therapy as compared to a control group, passive treatment, placebo, or another intervention, and allowed co-interventions on female breast cancer survivors. Two reviewers examined the sources individually, calculated the risk of bias and extracted the data (PROSPERO number CRD42020215823). (3) Results: A total of eight RCTs were included. The results suggested that myofascial therapy does not have a greater statistically significant immediate effect on pain intensity (SMD: −0.15; 95% CI −0.48, 0.19), functionality (SMD: −0.17; 95% CI −0.43, 0.09) and range of motion in flexion (SMD: 0.30; 95% CI −0.13, 0.74) than an inactive, passive treatment or another intervention. However, a statistically significant result was observed for the abduction shoulder in favor of the experimental group (SMD: 0.46; 95% CI 0.05, 0.87; p = 0.03). (4) Conclusion: In general, although we found greater overall effects in support of the intervention with myofascial therapy than other control groups/types of interventions, the subgroup analysis revealed inconsistent results supporting myofascial therapy applied to breast cancer survivors.

Is it really useful the Harmonic scalpel in axillary dissection for locally advanced breast cancer? A case series

BACKGROUND

The seroma is one of the most common complications in the axillary lymph nodal dissection (different surgical approaches have been tried to reduce the seroma incidence). In our study we evaluate the outcome of patients using or not the ultrasonic scalpel (Harmonic scalpel) according to a standardized surgical technique.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2011 to December 2015 120 patients underwent axillary dissection for breast cancer. Patients were divided in two groups: patients belonging to the first group underwent Harmonic scalpel dissection and patients belonging to the second group underwent classical dissection. Each group consisted of 60 patients. Quadrantectomy (QUAD) was performed in 54 patients, 66 women underwent mastectomy. In all patients axillary dissection included the I, II and III level. We compared two groups in terms of: time of surgery, hematoma, drainage volume, days of sealing drainage, seroma formation, number of post-seroma aspirations, upper limb lymphedema, wound infections, post-operative pain.

RESULTS

Statistically significant results were obtained in terms of the total volume of the breast and axillary drainage in the two techniques. There were no significant differences in the two samples in terms of operative time incidence of seroma, post-operative hematoma, wound infection, and lymphedema of the upper limb.

CONCLUSION

The small number of cases did not allow us to reach definitive conclusions. The use of Harmonic scalpel seems to show smaller incidence of seroma and reduction of the amount of both breast and axillary drainages. Further studies are needed to define the real advantage in terms of cost benefit of using these devices in the axillary surgery.

Prospective randomized controlled study to assess the value of a hemostatic and sealing agent for preventing seroma after axillary lymphadenectomy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Postoperative seroma after axillary lymphadenectomy leads to an increased use of resources and an impaired quality of life of patients. This randomized clinical trial was designed to assess the value of a hemostatic and sealing agent for decreasing seroma occurrence after axillary lymphadenectomy.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, blind study was conducted on 91 axillary lymphadenectomies distributed into a control group (n = 47) and a test group in which a collagen sponge coated with human coagulation factors was used (n = 44). Primary end-points were number of days before removal of axillary drainage, axillary drainage output, and occurrence of seroma, wound infection, haematoma, or wound dehiscence, within 8 weeks of surgery. Bivariate and multivariate analyses on seroma occurrence were performed.

RESULTS

Seroma occurred in 29 patients (31.86%). A significant direct relationship (P = 0.002) was only noted between use of the hemostatic and sealing agent and nonoccurrence of seroma. In the multivariate study, the only variable found to be significantly related to seroma occurrence was use of the above agent (P = 0.046; odds ratio: 3.365 [95%CI: 1.024-11.060]).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a collagen sponge coated with human coagulation factors following axillary lymphadenectomy was associated to a lower incidence of postoperative seroma. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:423-427. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[Prevention of seroma post-mastectomy by surgical padding technique]

INTRODUCTION

Every year, 20,000 mastectomy are realized. The most common complication of these surgical procedure is seroma, occurring in a range of 10 to 85% of the cases, which may be responsible for an increased morbidity by complications: disunity of surgical flap, infection, and delay in administrating adjuvant therapies.

OBJECTIVE

We focused on a post-mastectomy padding technique, aiming at decreasing incidence of postoperative seromas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of patients treated with mastectomy from January 2012 to March 2014 in Amiens University Hospital. Forty-two patients were included: 20 to the "padding's" group and 22 to the "control's" group.

RESULTS

Drainage flow was significantly decreased at Day 1, Day 2, Day 3 and throughout hospitalization after padding (358.5mL versus 685mL; P=0.02). Hospital stays were significantly shortened by 2 days (5.3 versus 7.3 days; P<0.05) for patients receiving padding surgery.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Our results show a benefit in the mastectomy padding flap. However, the retrospective character of our study and its strength character imply bias and data not available such as complications in type of wound dehiscence, pain, necrosis, the period from the establishment of the adjuvant therapies and aesthetic evaluation of technique. As such, we initiated a prospective randomized multicenter study late 2013, named PRELYMCA, which should be able to answer the pending questions.

[Prevention of lymphoceles and gynaecologic cancers]

Lymphoceles are the most frequent complications following systematic lymphadenectomy in gynaecologic cancers. Some of them may have clinical significance with high morbidity. Through a review of literature, we describe surgical methods (way of surgery, lymphadenectomy type, sentinel lymph node, peritonization, drainages, lymphostasis, surgical patch) and medical methods (somatostatin analogs and nutrition treatment) which could prevent lymphoceles formation after pelvic and lumboaortic lymphadenectomy.

Incidence of myofascial pain syndrome in breast cancer surgery: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Pain after breast cancer therapy is a recognized complication found to have an adverse impact on patient's quality of life, increasing psychosocial distress. In recent years, case reports about myofascial pain syndrome are emerging in thoracic surgery as a cause of postsurgery pain. Myofascial pain syndrome is a regional pain syndrome characterized by myofascial trigger points in palpable taut bands of skeletal muscle that refers pain a distance, and that can cause distant motor and autonomic effects.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the incidence of myofascial pain syndrome prospectively 12 months after breast cancer surgery.

METHODS

Each participant was assessed preoperatively, postoperatively between day 3 and day 5, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. A physical therapist, expert in the diagnosis of myofascial pain syndrome, performed follow-up assessments. Pain descriptions by the patients and pain pattern drawings in body forms guided the physical examination. The patients were not given any information concerning myofascial pain or other muscle pain syndromes.

RESULTS

One year follow-up was completed by 116 women. Of these, 52 women developed myofascial pain syndrome (44.8%, 95% confidence interval: 35.6, 54.3).

CONCLUSION

Myofascial pain syndrome is a common source of pain in women undergoing breast cancer surgery that includes axillary lymph node dissection at least during the first year after surgery. Myofascial pain syndrome is one potential cause of chronic pain in breast cancer survivors who have undergone this kind of surgery.

Axillary web syndrome after axillary dissection in breast cancer: a prospective study

The axillary web syndrome is a self-limiting and frequently overlooked cause of significant morbidity in the early post-operative period after breast cancer axillary surgery, which is characterized by axillary pain that runs down the medial arm, limited shoulder range of motion affecting mainly shoulder abduction, and cords of subcutaneous tissue extending from axilla into the medial arm, made visible or palpable and painful by shoulder abduction. We evaluated the incidence of axillary web syndrome after axillary lymph-node dissection. Altogether 116 patients who underwent axillary lymph-node dissection were assessed for axillary web syndrome. Range of shoulder abduction, pain, and the subjective feeling of tightness along the arm were recorded. Axillary web syndrome was found in 56 patients, which means an incidence of 48.3% (CI95%: 38.9, 57.7). Axillary web syndrome is a significant self-limited cause of morbidity of axillary surgery ocurring not only in the early post-operative period.