Tumeurs borderline de l’ovaire : état des lieux

Genetic profile of borderline ovarian tumors in the Lebanese population by whole-exome sequencing

OBJECTIVE

To assess the molecular profile of borderline ovarian tumors (BOT) in the Lebanese population by whole-exome sequencing and to correlate the results with the patients' clinical profiles.

METHODS

We included in this retrospective study 33 tumors belonging to 32 Lebanese women presenting with BOT, diagnosed at Hôtel Dieu de France. A total of 234 genes involved in different germinal and somatic types of cancer were analyzed using next-generation sequencing.

RESULTS

Molecular analysis of these tumors allowed us to detect mutations in genes involved in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade in 57.58% of BOT and to identify variants affecting the DNA repair mechanism in 63.89% of samples. Furthermore, our initial analysis revealed an association between defects in DNA double-strand break repair and the occurrence of mucinous BOT, in 75% of the cases.

CONCLUSION

This study reports the molecular profiles of BOT in the Lebanese population and compares them to the literature. This is the first study associating the DNA repair pathway to BOT.

Tumors of low malignant potential a single institution experience

•

The tumors of low malignant potential are an independent group of ovarian epithelial tumors.

•

The overall survival at 5 and 10 years was respectively of 96,9% and 92,8%.

•

After a mean follow up of 10 years, we report 7 cases of locoregional relapse.

•

After conservative surgery two patients achieved full term pregnancies.

•

More studies are required for a higher grade of recommendation.

Background

The tumors of low malignant potential are an independent group of the ovarian epithelial tumors. They represents 10–20% of all ovarian epithelial tumors.

Our aim through this study to determine how to treat this disease in the most suitable way.

Methods

A retrospective study involving 73 patients diagnosed with TLMP and treated at our Institute between September 1975 and June 2010.

Results

The median age was 49 years. In 33% of the cases, the patients were younger than 40 years. Our study included 38 mucinous tumors, 30 serous and 5 mixed. The tumors were stage I in 69% of the cases, stage II in 11% and stage III in 20%.

All patients had surgery as a primary treatment. The surgery was radical in 77% of the cases. Five patients had an adjuvant chemotherapy. After a mean follow up of 10 years, we reported 7 cases of local relapses. The prognostic factors for a disease free survival were: the stage of the tumor and the presence of invasive implants. The overall survival at 5 and 10 years was respectively of 96.9% and 92.8%. The prognostic factors for overall survival were: the age, the stage, the existence of a residual tumor, the presence of pseudomyxoma or peritoneal implants. After having a conservative surgery two patients achieved full term pregnancies.

Conclusion

Randomized studies are required to back-up our findings and give a higher grade of recommendation to the actual standard of care.

[Unilateral borderline ovarian tumor and unilateral adenexectomy?]

To perform an adnexectomy in case of unilateral borderline tumor must consider the risk of recurrence, the preservation of fertility, and to integrate a global comprehensive management of a couple. Adnexectomy can be considering as a legitimate option when the woman desire a pregnancy. The risk of recurrence is low and the global survey high. Identification of woman with a high risk of recurrence is necessary. Adnexectomy can be considering as a legitimate option to preserve fertility in case of unilateral tumor. However, ovarian reserve data are missing after the surgery. Adnexectomy can be considering for the management of infertile woman with unilateral borderline tumor. IVF can be performed in the absence of any poor prognosis factor. Management with ovarian cryopreservation and In vitro Maturation remain unclear.

Laparoscopic restaging of borderline ovarian tumours (BLOT): a retrospective study of 142 cases

OBJECTIVES

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

To analyse the impact of restaging, on recurrences and survival, in BLOT.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVE

To cluster patients who could be exempted from restaging.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective study, included patients operated for a BLOT, between January 1990, and December 2007, in gynaecological surgery units of the University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand. Two groups were evaluated: patients with and without optimal restaging.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-two patients were included. Optimal initial staging rate was 38.7% (n=55). Among the eighty-seven women not initially staged, two groups were compared: restaged (n=45) and non-restaged patients (n=42). Mean follow-up was 80.5 months. Overall survival was 93.7%. Relapse rate was 7.7% (n=11). Disease free survival (DFS) was 88% after a mean follow-up of 80.5 months. One death was noted. Optimal restaging rate was 31.7% (n=45, 43 by laparoscopy). Mean follow-up was of 87.1 months among restaged patients, 84.5 months among non-restaged patients (p=0.93). Relapse incidence was significantly higher in non restaged, than in restaged patients (p=0.008). DFS was significantly longer among restaged than non-restaged patients, (p=0.072). Younger age (p=0.04), conservative treatment (p<10(-4)) or non-diploidy (p=0.04) increased the incidence of relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

When initial staging is missing, restaging improves the patients outcome in comparison to non-restaged groups. Laparoscopy is a valuable surgical option. This study suggests that a selected group of patients, older than 30 years old, submitted to a radical treatment, presenting a diploid, non micropapillar, mucinous BLOT, without visible implants during careful peritoneal inspection, could be exempted from restaging. They represented 11.6% of our population.

Parameters of blood count and tumor markers in patients with borderline ovarian tumors: a retrospective analysis and relation to staging

The aim of this paper was to evaluate the parameters of blood count and tumor markers in borderline ovarian tumors. We evaluated 21 patients who had confirmed histopathologic diagnosis of borderline ovarian tumor. We recorded age, parity, tumor type, stage of cancer, serum levels of tumor markers (CA-125, CA-15.3, CA-19.9, CEA, AFP), and the parameters of blood count, fasting glucose, disease-free survival and overall. The patients were divided into two groups, stage IA (n = 13) and stage IB-IIIC (n = 8). The unpaired t-test and Fisher's exact test were used, with P values of less than 0.05 being considered to indicate statistical significance. Levels of red blood cells, hematocrit, and hemoglobin were significantly higher in stage IA when compared with stage IB-IIIC (P < 0.05). The levels of tumor marker CEA had a tendency to be higher in the group stage IB-IIIC (0.08). Abnormal levels of CEA and CA-19.9 were found more frequently in stages IB-IIIC. Therefore, parameters of blood count, CEA, and CA-19.9 should be targeted for further research in identifying prognostic factors in borderline tumors.