Technique et intérêt de la rotation manuelle en cas de variété postérieure

Internal manual rotation in intrapartal arrest of fetal head engagement

OBJECTIVE

The success of internal manual or digital rotation of the head in mechanical dystocia due to malpresentation, malposition or malrotation is presented in this paper on our own clinical material with reference of today's research and clinical recommendations.

STUDY DESIGN

Through a retrospective bicentric clinical study, we investigated the success of internal head rotation in two University Clinics for gynecology and obstetrics from year 2017 to 2023. In 152 singleton term (37-42 weeks) in cases of persistens intrapartum arrest of the fetal head. After palpatory and ultrasonographically verified arrest of fetal head engagement, a therapeutic manual (Liepmann) or digital rotation was performed.

RESULTS

In 152 cases, manual rotation was performed in 108 (71.05 %) and digital rotation in 44 (28.94 %) cases in 73 (48.02 %) primiparous and 79 (51.97 %) multiparous. Intrapartum identification by digital palpation was done in all cases, and the following are: persistent occipital posterior position in 68 (44.73%), persistent deep transverse head presentation in 12 (7.89%), persistent high (longitudinal) occipital presentation in 64 (42.10 %) and persistent anterior asynclitism in 8 (5.26 %) cases. Episiotomy was used in 36 (23.68%) cases. Vacuum extraction was completed in 14 (9.21 %) deliveries, and cesarean section due to unsuccessful internal rotation in 15 (9.8 %) cases (%) without other indication. We did not record any intrapartum complications or cardiotocographic abnormalities. Cervical lacerations were treated with sutures in 4 cases (2.63 %). Successful correction of internal rotation procedure with spontaneous vaginal delivery was found in 80.92 % of cases. If we exclude delivery assisted by vacuum extraction whose indications were fetal hypoxia or dystocia after successful internal head rotation procedure, then the success rate of this method was 90.13 %.

CONCLUSION

Internal head rotation is a simple, safe and successful obstetric manual intervention that directly increases the rate of vaginal deliveries after correction of the birth mechanism anomaly and directly reduces the percentage of cesarean section. Manual or digital head rotation is an established midwifery/obstetric skill in several centers which, based on numerous clinical researches and experience, should become protocolized and included in the guidelines of professional associations.

Persistent occiput posterior position: predictive factors of spontaneous rotation of the fetal head

OBJECTIVES

To assess factors associated with spontaneous rotation in the occiput anterior position for fetuses in persistent occiput posterior (OP) during the second stage of labor. To evaluate maternal and fetal outcomes after spontaneous rotation of persistent OP.

METHODS

This is a prospective cohort of 495 women with fetuses in persistent OP position, confirmed with ultrasonography during the second stage of labor. We performed simple logistic regressions, followed by multiple logistic regressions.

RESULTS

Among 495 women with fetuses in persistent OP position, 78 fetuses (16%) underwent a spontaneous rotation during the second stage of labor. The multivariate analysis found that a short duration of the first stage of labor (<7 h) was associated with a spontaneous rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor (OR 0.43 [0.23; 0.76. There were fewer episiotomies (25.6% vs 52.3%, p < .01), cesarean sections (0% v. 5.4%, p = .03), and instrumental deliveries (8.9% vs. 50%, p < .01) in the "spontaneous rotation" group, and the two groups were similar regarding post-partum hemorrhage.The newborns in the "spontaneous rotation" group had a higher Apgar score at 1 min (10 v. 9, p = .02). The two groups did not differ for other neonatal parameters, such as arterial pH value, Apgar score at 5 min, birth trauma, or transfer into the pediatric unit.

CONCLUSION

A shorter duration of the first stage of labor (< 7 h) is a predictive factor of spontaneous rotation in the occiput anterior position for fetuses in persistent OP position. A spontaneous rotation in case of an OP position is associated with better maternal and fetal outcomes.

Delivery Mode After Manual Rotation of Occiput Posterior Fetal Positions: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether manual rotation of fetuses in occiput posterior positions at full dilation increases the rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery.

METHODS

In an open, single-center, randomized controlled trial, patients with a term, singleton gestation, epidural analgesia, and ultrasonogram-confirmed occiput posterior position at the start of the second stage of labor were randomized to either manual rotation or expectant management. Our primary endpoint was the rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery. Secondary endpoints were operative vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery, and maternal and neonatal morbidity. Analyses were based on an intention-to-treat method. A sample size of 107 patients per group (n=214) was planned to detect a 20% increase in the percent of patients with a spontaneous vaginal delivery (assuming 60% without manual rotation vs 80% with manual rotation) with 90% power and alpha of 0.05.

RESULTS

Between February 2017 and January 2020, 236 patients were randomized to either manual rotation (n=117) or expectant management (n=119). The success rate of the manual rotation maneuver, defined by conversion to an anterior position as confirmed by ultrasonogram, was 68%. The rate of the primary endpoint did not differ between the groups (58.1% in manual rotation group vs 59.7% in expectant management group (risk difference -1.6; 95% CI -14.1 to 11.0). Manual rotation did not decrease the rate of operative vaginal delivery (29.9% in manual rotation group vs 33.6% in expectant management group (risk difference -3.7; 95% CI -16.6 to 8.2) nor the rate of cesarean delivery (12.0% in manual rotation group vs 6.7% in expectant management group (risk difference 5.3; 95% CI -2.2 to 12.6). Maternal and neonatal morbidity was also similar across the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Manual rotation of occiput posterior positions at the start of second stage of labor does not increase the rate of vaginal delivery without instrumental assistance.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03009435.

[Normal childbirth: physiologic labor support and medical procedures. Guidelines of the French National Authority for Health (HAS) with the collaboration of the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF) and the French College of Midwives (CNSF) - - When and how to take medical action during labor?]

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this chapter is to provide recommendations for good practice regarding drug and technical interventions that may be considered during normal delivery.

METHODS

These recommendations were established by an expert consensus based on an analysis of the scientific literature and the French and international recommendations available on the subject.

RESULTS

Interventions during latent phase of the first stage of labor (up to 5-6cm) must be performed according to the fetal and maternal contraction tolerance (consensus agreement). In the active phase (from 5-6cm to full dilatation), dilation speed under 1cm/4h between 5 and 7cm or under 1cm/2h beyond 7cm is considered abnormal, it is then recommended to propose: an amniotomy if the membranes are intact and administration of oxytocin if membranes are already ruptured and uterine contractions are considered insufficient (consensus agreement). Intravenous (IV) antibiotic prophylaxis (at least four hours before birth) is recommended during labor in women at risk for group B streptococcal (GBS) maternofetal infection (GBS vaginal portage or GBS bacteriuria during pregnancy or history of maternofetal GBS infection) (grade B). In case of rupture of membranes after 37weeks of gestation without spontaneous labor, it is recommended: if the patient has GBS, to begin antibiotic prophylaxis immediately (consensus agreement); if delivery did not occur after 12hours, to start antibiotic prophylaxis (grade A), to set up dedicated patient monitoring (consensus agreement), to screen for an infection (at least a full blood count, a vaginal sample and a dipstick test) (consensus agreement). It is recommended not to start expulsive efforts as soon as a complete dilation is identified but to let the fetal presentation go down (grade A). The administration of oxytocin is recommended if the patient does not feel inclined to push and the presentation has not reached low-pelvic station after two hours of complete dilation in case of insufficient uterine activity (AE). There is no argument for recommending a push technique over another (grade B). It is recommended to inform the gynecologist-obstetrician in case of non-progression of the fetus after two hours of complete dilation with sufficient uterine activity (AE). Prophylactic administration of oxytocin at 5 or 10 IU is recommended to prevent postpartum hemorrhage after vaginal delivery (grade A). Administration could be performed intravenously (slow injection over about a minute) or intramuscularly (AE). In case of placental retention, manual removal of the placenta is recommended (grade A). In absence of bleeding, it must be performed after 30mins after birth, without exceeding 60mins (AE).

CONCLUSION

These recommendations define indications and methods for drug and technical interventions during a normal delivery to prevent poor obstetrical outcomes.

Intra pelvic spontaneous rotation of persistent occiput posterior position in case of operative vaginal delivery with spatulas

OBJECTIVES

In 5 % of vaginal deliveries in case of cephalic presentation there is a persistent occipital posterior position known to be associated with a higher maternal and neonatal morbidity. In these situations, vacuum extractor seems to be the best choice for assisted delivery but it also has limits and contraindications, for example an important caput succadenum or premature birth. The aim of our study was to evaluate the rate of intra-pelvic rotation of persistent occipital posterior position without instrumental rotation in case of operative delivery with spatulas.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, monocentric and descriptive study evaluating the rate of spontaneous intra-pelvic rotation of persistent occipital posterior position in case of assisted delivery with spatulas among all live births at the Besançon University Medical Center between 2010 and 2017.

RESULTS

There were 20 205 births during the study and 81(0,4 %) operative deliveries by spatulas in case of persistent occipital posterior position. Delivery in occiput anterior (OA) position was obtained in 36 cases (44.4 %). There was no significant difference in maternal or neonatal morbidity between both groups and perineum injuries were less severe in case of OA delivery.

CONCLUSION

Operative deliveries by spatulas without instrumental rotation in case of persistent occipital-posterior position seem to be a relevant alternative to vacuum extractor, especially in case of premature birth or important caput succedaneum without altering the maternal or neonatal prognostic.

[Manual rotation in occiput posterior position: A systematic review in 2019]

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and the benefits of manual rotation in the management of Occiput-posterior positions in 2019.

METHODS

A systematic review of literature was performed using the MEDLINE and COCHRANE LIBRARY databases, in order to identify articles concerning maternal and neonatal outcomes after a manual rotation, through January 2019. Information on study characteristics (review, author, year of publication), population, objectives and main neonatal and maternal outcomes were extracted.

RESULTS

A total of 51 articles were identified and 12 articles were selected for the systematic review. The rate of successful manual rotation were about 47 to 90%. There were more success if systematic manual rotation, multiparity, engagement, spontaneous labour and maternal age<35. The 2nd stage of labour was shorter after an attempt of manual rotation. The randomised controlled trials did not find any statistical difference concerning operative deliveries or neonatal and maternal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The manual rotation is an obstetrical manoeuvre which must be regulated and only practiced by trained operators. Currently, the state of science is not sufficient to recommend the manual rotation as a systematic practice in 2019.

[Pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of occiput posterior presentation during labor]

Persistant occiput posterior (OP) positions are the commonest malpresentations of the fetal head during labor and their diagnosis remains challenging. They are associated to prolonged second stage of labor, prolonged expulsive efforts, labor augmentation, cesarean sections and instrumental deliveries. On the maternal side, severe perineal tears, post-partum hemorrhage or chorioamnionitis are more frequent. Currently, prevention of persistent OP positions is based on the maintain of precise maternal positions. Several positions have been evaluated but only lateral position on the same side of the fetal spine has proved its effectiveness. Fetal head rotation can also be achieved with extraction instruments though none has ever been evaluated by a randomized controlled trial. Obstetrical forceps seem more efficient than vacuum but are associated with severe perineal tears. Evaluation of rotation with Thierry's spatulas is scarce. Last, manual rotation is of routine use in many wards. This management is associated with a twofold reduction of operative delivery rate and rare adverse outcomes but has never been evaluated through randomized control trial.

Predictors of successful manual rotation for occiput posterior positions

OBJECTIVE

To identify predictors of the success of manual rotation of fetuses in an occiput posterior position.

METHODS

A prospective, observational, single-center study included all women with a singleton pregnancy at term with a fetus in an occiput posterior position for whom manual rotation was attempted from December 1, 2013, to April 30, 2015 at a tertiary care maternity unit in Nancy, France. Occiput posterior position was confirmed by ultrasonography, and success of manual rotation was defined by the occiput anterior position of the fetus after the attempt.

RESULTS

Occiput posterior position was diagnosed in 233 (9.2%) of the 2522 deliveries during the study period and the majority of cases were managed successfully by manual rotation (167 [71.7%]). Factors associated with successful rotation were fetal engagement (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-4.56), spontaneous labor (aOR 1.85, 95% CI 1.01-3.43), and no failure to progress (aOR 2.01, 95% CI 1.02-3.94). Successful manual rotation was associated with lower rates of cesarean (P<0.001) and instrumental (P<0.001) deliveries.

CONCLUSION

Study findings suggested that manual rotation, especially after fetal engagement, succeeded more often when performed systematically than when it was attempted after failure to progress.

The impact of manual rotation of the occiput posterior position on spontaneous vaginal delivery rate: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial (RMOS)

Background

The frequency of posterior presentations (occiput of the fetus towards the sacrum of the mother) in labor is approximately 20% and, of this, 5% remain posterior until the end of labor. These posterior presentations are associated with higher rates of cesarean section and instrumental delivery. Manual rotation of a posterior position in order to rotate the fetus to an anterior position has been proposed in order to reduce the rate of instrumental fetal delivery. No randomized study has compared the efficacy of this procedure to expectant management. We therefore propose a monocentric, interventional, randomized, prospective study to show the superiority of vaginal delivery rates using the manual rotation of the posterior position at full dilation over expectant management.

Methods

Ultrasound imaging of the presentation will be performed at full dilation on all the singleton pregnancies for which a clinical suspicion of a posterior position was raised at more than 37 weeks’ gestation (WG). In the event of an ultrasound confirming a posterior position, the patient will be randomized into an experimental group (manual rotation) or a control group (expectative management with no rotation). For a power of 90% and the hypothesis that vaginal deliveries will increase by 20%, (10% of patients lost to follow-up) 238 patients will need to be included in the study. The primary endpoint will be the rate of spontaneous vaginal deliveries (expected rate without rotation: 60%). The secondary endpoints will be the rate of fetal extractions (cesarean or instrumental) and the maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality rates. The intent-to-treat study will be conducted over 24 months. Recruitment started in February 2017.

To achieve the primary objective, we will perform a test comparing the number of spontaneous vaginal deliveries in the two groups using Pearson’s chi-squared test (provided that the conditions for using this test are satisfactory in terms of numbers). In the event that this test cannot be performed, we will use Fisher’s exact test.

Discussion

Given that the efficacy of manual rotation has not been proven with a high level of evidence, the practice of this technique is not systematically recommended by scholarly societies and is, therefore, rarely performed by obstetric gynecologists.

If our hypothesis regarding the superiority of manual rotation is confirmed, our study will help change delivery practices in cases of posterior fetal position. An increase in the rates of vaginal delivery will help decrease the short- and long-term rates of morbidity and mortality following cesarean section.

Manual rotation is a simple and effective method with a success rate of almost 90%. Several preliminary studies have shown that manual rotation is associated with reduced rates for fetal extraction and maternal complications: Shaffer has shown that the cesarean section rate is lower in patients for whom a manual rotation is performed successfully (2%) with a 9% rate of cesarean sections when manual rotation is performed versus 41% when it is not performed. Le Ray has shown that manual rotation significantly reduces vaginal delivery rates via fetal extraction (23.2% vs 38.7%, p < 0.01). However, manual rotation is not systematically performed due to the absence of proof of its efficacy in retrospective studies and quasi-experimental before/after studies.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT03009435. Registered on 30 December 2016

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2497-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Influence of ultrasound determination of fetal head position on mode of delivery: a pragmatic randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the influence of ultrasound determination of fetal head position on mode of delivery.

METHODS

This was a pragmatic open-label randomized controlled trial that included women with a singleton pregnancy in the vertex presentation at ≥ 37 weeks' gestation, cervical dilation ≥ 8 cm and who received epidural anesthesia. Women were assigned randomly to undergo either digital vaginal examination (VE group) or both digital vaginal and ultrasound examinations (VE+US group) to determine fetal head position. When the ultrasound and digital vaginal findings were inconsistent in the VE+US group, the ultrasound result was used for clinical management. The primary outcome assessed was operative delivery (Cesarean or instrumental vaginal delivery), and maternal and fetal morbidity were also assessed.

RESULTS

The VE and VE+US groups included 959 and 944 women, respectively. The overall rate of operative delivery was significantly higher in the VE+US group than in the VE group: 33.7% vs 27.1%, respectively (relative risk (RR), 1.24 (95% CI, 1.08-1.43)), as was the rate of Cesarean delivery: 7.8% vs 4.9%, respectively (RR, 1.60 (95% CI, 1.12-2.28)). The rate of instrumental vaginal delivery was also higher, albeit not significantly: 25.8% in the VE+US group vs 22.2% in the VE group (RR, 1.16 (95% CI, 0.99-1.37)). Neonatal outcomes did not differ between the two groups. When analysis was restricted to instrumental vaginal deliveries only, maternal and neonatal morbidity outcomes were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Correction of fetal occiput position, determined initially by digital vaginal examination, using systematic ultrasound examination did not improve management of labor and increased the rate of operative delivery without decreasing maternal and neonatal morbidity.

[What is new about obstetrical interventions during labor and normal delivery?]

This systematic review of the literature reports studies published over the last five years (2008-2013) about interventions during labor and normal delivery. The points made concerning active management of labor, interventions aimed at improving maternal comfort, management of occiput posterior fetal presentations, management of second stage of labor and prevention techniques for perineal lesions. Although obstetrics remains an "art" to which training is mainly based on experience and clinical expertise, this "art" at present cannot live without the evidence-based medicine. Numerous randomized trials published and in process, demonstrate awareness of this reality in our specialty.