1
|
Pavone M, Jochum F, Lecointre L, Bizzarri N, Taliento C, Restaino S, Vizzielli G, Fagotti A, Scambia G, Querleu D, Akladios C. Efficacy and safety of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in ovarian cancer: a systematic review of current evidence. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2024; 310:1845-1856. [PMID: 38879697 PMCID: PMC11392984 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07586-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 09/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND PIPAC is a recent approach for intraperitoneal chemotherapy with promising results for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. A systematic review was conducted to assess current evidence on the efficacy and outcomes of PIPAC in patients affected by ovarian cancer. METHODS The study adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched up to December 2023. Studies reporting data on patients with OC treated with PIPAC were included in the qualitative analysis. RESULTS Twenty-one studies and six clinical trials with 932 patients who underwent PIPAC treatment were identified. The reported first access failure was 4.9%. 89.8% of patients underwent one, 60.7% two and 40% received three or more PIPAC cycles. Pathological tumour response was objectivated in 13 studies. Intra-operative complications were reported in 11% of women and post-operative events in 11.5% with a 0.82% of procedure-related mortality. Quality of life scores have been consistently stable or improved during the treatment time. The percentage of OC patients who became amenable for cytoreductive surgery due to the good response after PIPAC treatment for palliative purposes is reported to be 2.3%. CONCLUSION The results showed that PIPAC is safe and effective for palliative purposes, with a good pathological tumour response and quality of life. Future prospective studies would be needed to explore the role of this treatment in different stages of the disease, investigating a paradigm shift towards the use of PIPAC with curative intent for women who are not eligible for primary cytoreductive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Pavone
- Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, IHU Strasbourg, 1 place de l'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France.
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
| | - Floriane Jochum
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Lise Lecointre
- Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, IHU Strasbourg, 1 place de l'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- UMR 7357, Laboratoire Des Sciences de l'Ingénieur, de l'Informatique et de l'Imagerie, ICube, Université de Strasbourg, 67000, Strasbourg, France
| | - Nicolò Bizzarri
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Cristina Taliento
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Stefano Restaino
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Maria Della Misericordia University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Vizzielli
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Maria Della Misericordia University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Anna Fagotti
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Denis Querleu
- Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, IHU Strasbourg, 1 place de l'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Cherif Akladios
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Coccolini F, Fugazzola P, Montori G, Ansaloni L, Chiarugi M. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian cancer with peritoneal metastases, systematic review of the literature and focused personal experience. J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 12:S144-S181. [PMID: 33968435 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-2020-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) causes 60% of ovarian cancer cases and is the fourth most common cause of death from cancer in women. The standard of care for EOC includes a combination of surgery followed by intravenous chemotherapy. Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy (CT) has been introduced into the therapeutic algorithm of EOC with positive results. To explore existing results regarding intraperitoneal chemotherapy a systematic review of the literature and an analysis of our own institutional prospective database of patients treated with cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for EOC at different stages were conducted. The focused report concerning our personal experience with advanced EOC treated with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC produced the following results: In 57 patients cisplatin + paclitaxel as HIPEC was the only significant factor improving overall survival (OS) at multivariate analysis (OR 6.54, 95% CI: 1.24-34.47, P=0.027). Patients treated with HIPEC cisplatin + paclitaxel showed a median OS of 46 months (SD 6.4, 95% CI: 33.4-58.6), while patients treated with other HIPEC regimens showed a median OS of 12 months (SD 3.1, 95% CI: 6.0-18.0). The 2y-OS was 72% and 3y-OS was 68% for cisplatin + paclitaxel as HIPEC, while the 2y- and 3y-OS was 0% for other HIPEC regimens. Patients treated with HIPEC cisplatin + paclitaxel showed a median disease-free survival (DFS) of 13 months (SD 1.6, 95% CI: 9.9-16.1), while patients treated with other HIPEC regimens showed a median DFS of 8 months (SD 3.1, 95% CI: 1.9-14.1). In conclusion, HIPEC cisplatin + paclitaxel in ovarian cancer showed positive results that may be considered semi-definitive according to the level of evidence and should be considered a starting point for further investigations. At present HIPEC cisplatin + paclitaxel should be proposed to patients with advanced ovarian cancer as standard treatment at almost all stages of disease. Platinum + taxane-based intraperitoneal regimens demonstrated superior results compared to other regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Paola Fugazzola
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | | | - Luca Ansaloni
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Massimo Chiarugi
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Heated IntraPEritoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for Patients With Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2016; 26:661-70. [DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000000664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundDespite advances in surgical oncology, most patients with primary ovarian cancer develop a recurrence that is associated with a poor prognosis. The aim of this review was to establish the impact of Heated IntraPEritoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the overall survival of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.MethodsA search of PubMed/MEDLINE databases was performed in February 2015 using the terms “recurrent ovarian cancer,” “cytoreductive surgery/cytoreduction,” and “heated/hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.” Only English articles with available abstracts assessing the impact of HIPEC in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer were examined. The primary outcome measure was overall survival, whereas secondary outcomes included disease-free survival and HIPEC-related morbidity.ResultsSixteen studies with 1168 patients were analyzed. Most studies were Level IV, with 4 studies graded as Level III and 1 Level II. Cisplatin was the main chemotherapeutic agent used, but variations were observed in the actual technique, temperature of perfusate, and duration of treatment. In patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC, the overall survival ranged between 26.7 and 35 months, with disease-free survival varying between 8.5 and 48 months. Heated IntraPEritoneal Chemotherapy seems to confer survival benefits to patients with recurrent disease, with a randomized controlled study reporting that the overall survival is doubled when cytoreductive surgery is compared with cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy (13. 4 vs 26.7 months). Heated IntraPEritoneal Chemotherapy–related morbidity ranged between 13.6% and 100%, but it was mainly minor and not significantly different from that experienced by patients who only underwent cytoreduction.ConclusionsCytoreductive surgery and HIPEC seem to be associated with promising results in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. Large international prospective studies are required to further quantify the true efficacy of HIPEC and identify the optimal treatment protocol for a maximum survival benefit.
Collapse
|
4
|
Huo Y, Richards A, Liauw W, Morris D. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2015; 41:1578-89. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.08.172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2015] [Revised: 08/17/2015] [Accepted: 08/24/2015] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
|
5
|
Raherinantenaina F, Rakotomena SD, Hasiniatsy NRE, Rakototiana FA, Rafaramino F, Ratsimba HNR. [A retrospective study of ovarian cancer with a median follow of 42 months]. Pan Afr Med J 2015; 20:211. [PMID: 26113942 PMCID: PMC4470446 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2015.20.211.6113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2015] [Accepted: 02/15/2015] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Florine Rafaramino
- Service d'Oncologie-Hématologie-Radiothérapie, CHUJRA, Antananarivo Madagascar
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Delotte J, Arias T, Guerin O, Boulahssass R, Bereder I, Bongain A, Benchimol D, Bereder JM. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer in elderly women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2015; 94:435-9. [DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2014] [Accepted: 12/29/2014] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jérôme Delotte
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproduction and Fetal Medicine; University Hospital Center of Archet II; University of Nice-Sophia Antipolis; Nice France
| | - Tatiana Arias
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproduction and Fetal Medicine; University Hospital Center of Archet II; University of Nice-Sophia Antipolis; Nice France
| | - Olivier Guerin
- Department of Geriatrics; UCOG Paca-Est; University Hospital Center of Cimiez; University of Nice-Sophia Antipolis; Nice France
| | - Rabia Boulahssass
- Department of Geriatrics; UCOG Paca-Est; University Hospital Center of Cimiez; University of Nice-Sophia Antipolis; Nice France
| | - Isabelle Bereder
- Department of Geriatrics; UCOG Paca-Est; University Hospital Center of Cimiez; University of Nice-Sophia Antipolis; Nice France
| | - André Bongain
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproduction and Fetal Medicine; University Hospital Center of Archet II; University of Nice-Sophia Antipolis; Nice France
| | - Daniel Benchimol
- Department of General Surgery and Digestive Oncology; University Hospital Center of Archet II; University of Nice-Sophia Antipolis; Nice France
| | - Jean Marc Bereder
- Department of General Surgery and Digestive Oncology; University Hospital Center of Archet II; University of Nice-Sophia Antipolis; Nice France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
A critical appraisal of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the treatment of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2014; 136:130-5. [PMID: 25434634 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.11.072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2014] [Revised: 11/13/2014] [Accepted: 11/20/2014] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Our objective was to review the published experiences of the use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the treatment of advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer with a focus on survival outcomes. METHODS A search of the PubMed database (2008-2014) for articles specifically addressing the topic "HIPEC and ovarian cancer" was performed. We found a total of 22 publications that included 1450 patients. A final group of eleven studies (248 patients with advanced ovarian cancer) and eight publications (499 patients with recurrent sensitive ovarian cancer) that included information about survival were reviewed. RESULTS Among patients with primary ovarian cancer who were treated with primary debulking and HIPEC, the weighted median overall survival was 37.3 months (range 27-78), the median disease-free survival was 14.4 months (range 12-30), and the 5-yr-survival rate was 40% (range 28-72). In the recurrent cohort, the overall survival after HIPEC was 36.5 months (range 23-62), and the median disease-free survival was 20.2 months (range 11-29). The rates of severe morbidity were 25 and 19% in the primary and recurrent groups, respectively. CONCLUSION Although randomized trials are ongoing, the recently published retrospective data regarding the use of HIPEC for primary advanced and for recurrent ovarian cancer do not indicate any apparent advantage of this treatment in terms of the survival outcomes in these patients. Therefore, HIPEC cannot be considered a standard treatment and should not be offered outside of clinical trials.
Collapse
|
8
|
Update on the management and the role of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2014; 26:3-8. [PMID: 24247932 DOI: 10.1097/gco.0000000000000034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Ovarian cancer is the commonest gynaecological cancer and the fifth leading cause of cancer death in women worldwide. The majority of patients with ovarian cancer present at an advanced stage, and up to 70% of those treated with a curative approach eventually recur and succumb to their disease. This article examines the management of ovarian cancer over the years and the role of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the treatment algorithm. RECENT FINDINGS The surgical paradigm for ovarian cancer has changed and the goal is optimal cytoreduction with no residual disease. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy has been found to be superior to intravenous treatment alone, and the combination of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has produced encouraging results with improved disease-free and overall survivals at acceptable morbidity and mortality rates. SUMMARY The most important prognostic factor for ovarian cancer survival is the ability to achieve optimal cytoreduction with no residual disease. CRS and HIPEC should be considered as an option for the management of advanced ovarian cancer and further trials are required to determine its role in both the primary and recurrent settings.
Collapse
|