[Double-balloon device and intravaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in women with unfavourable cervix]

Comparing the effectiveness and safety of Dinoprostone vaginal insert and double-balloon catheter as cervical ripening treatments in Chinese patients

Background

This retrospective study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of Dinoprostone vaginal insert vs. double-balloon catheter as cervical ripening agents for labor induction.

Methods

Pregnant women with Bishop score <7, who received either Dinoprostone vaginal insert 10 mg or Cook's double-balloon catheter for labor induction, were studied. The primary outcome was the rate of vaginal delivery within 48 h; the secondary outcomes were the proportion of women undergoing cesarean section, labor duration, oxytocin administration, changes in Bishop score, complications during labor, and maternal/neonatal outcomes.

Results

One hundred and eighty-two women were included in Dinoprostone group, and 199 women were in double-balloon catheter group. The rate of vaginal delivery within 48 h was significantly higher in Dinoprostone group than that in double-balloon catheter group (90.11% vs. 75.38%, P = 0.0002). There were 18 cesarean section deliveries (9.89%) in Dinoprostone group and 49 cesarean section deliveries (24.62%) in double-balloon catheter group, with significant differences between two groups (P = 0.0002). The duration of labor was higher in Dinoprostone group, while the augmentation with oxytocin was significantly lower in Dinoprostone group than in double-balloon catheter group (all P < 0.0001). The incidence of chorioamnionitis was significantly higher in double-balloon catheter group as compared with Dinoprostone group (0 vs. 12, P = 0.0005), while neonatal outcomes were similar in two groups.

Conclusion

Dinoprostone vaginal insert as cervical ripening agent is more effective for labor induction and with lower risks of chorioamnionitis as compared with double balloon catheter in Chinese populations.

Intracervical double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone for cervical ripening in labor induction in pregnancies with a high risk of uterine hyperstimulation

PURPOSE

There are numerous methods for cervical ripening although not all of them are indicated in women presenting a higher risk of uterine hyperstimulation. To compare the efficacy and security of the two methods for cervical ripening in the induction of labor in these pregnancies.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of two cohorts consisting of pregnant women who gave birth from 2016 to 2019 (112 inductions with dinoprostone and 112 with intracervical double- balloon).

RESULTS

There are statistically significant differences in favor of dinoprostone in deliveries that occurred before 12 h since the start of the induction (28.6% vs 13.4%, p = 0.005) and a higher rate of cervical ripening (55.4% vs 33.9%; p = 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in induction time, the percentage of women delivering within 24 h or beyond, nor in the type of delivery. Additionally, a decreased need of oxytocin (60.7% vs 42.9%; p = 0.001) and a lower dose when used has been observed in the dinoprostone group. However, Dinoprostone also has a higher rate of minor maternal complications as uterine hyperstimulation (18.8% vs 3.6%; p = 0.001) and altered cardiotocography (26.8% vs 4.5%; p = 0.001). No significant difference has been found between the two groups regarding severe complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Dinoprostone presents a greater efficacy for cervical ripening and delivery in ≤ 12 h, with less need of oxytocin perfusion than inductions using an intracervical double-balloon. There is no significant difference in severe maternal complications between the two groups. In conclusion, Dinoprostone could be an effective and safe option for patients at risk of uterine hyperstimulation.

[Double-balloon catheter compared to vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in obese women at term]

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of a double-balloon catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 (dinoprostone) for cervical ripening in obese patients with unfavorable cervix at term.

METHODS

The study had an open-label, prospective combined with retrospective, observational design. From January 2013 until May 2016, a prospective cohort study of 46 women with pre-pregnancy BMI>30kg/m², live singleton term fetuses (>37 weeks) in vertex presentation and unfavorable cervix (Bishop score<6), who underwent labor induction for conventional indications using a double-balloon catheter. In the same period, 46 obese women who had undergone cervical ripening using vaginal dinoprostone (3mg) were retrospectively included. Women in groups were paired according to Bishop score before the insertion, pre-pregnancy BMI and parity. The primary outcome was a favorable cervix (Bishop score ≥6) 24h after cervical ripening.

RESULTS

After 24h, there was a significantly higher rate of women with favorable cervix (Bishop score ≥6) in the double-balloon group than in dinoprostone group (80.4% vs 47.8%; P=0.001). After adjustment, a double-balloon catheter was significantly associated with an efficient cervical ripening compared to vaginal dinoprostone (aOR 7.81, 95% CI 2.58-23.60). No difference was observed in cesarean section rate (39.1% in each group; P=0.96) and in mean induction time to vaginal delivery (34.5h in the balloon group vs 36.5h in the dinoprostone group; P=0.53). Maternal and neonatal outcomes were similar.

CONCLUSION

For obese patients at term, cervical ripening using a double-balloon catheter is more efficient on Bishop score after 24h compared to vaginal dinoprostone.