Influence d’un traitement anticoagulant pendant la grossesse sur l’anesthésie per-partum et les modalités d’accouchement

Induction or spontaneous labor for pregnant patients on anticoagulants?

OBJECTIVE

There are two approaches to peripartum management for pregnant patients undergoing anticoagulation treatments: spontaneous labor or scheduling an induction. A long interval without anticoagulation is a thrombosis risk factor, while a short interval leads to risks of delivery without epidural analgesia or post partum hemorrhage. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of planned induction versus spontaneous labor on obtaining neuraxial analgesia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective single-center study was conducted from 2012 to 2020 including all patients on preventive or curative low molecular-weight heparin at the time of delivery, excluding planned cesarean sections. The rates of neuraxial analgesia were compared between two groups: spontaneous labor and induction, as well as the intervals without anticoagulants.

RESULTS

127 patients were included. In the spontaneous labor group, 78% (44/56) received neuraxial analgesia versus 88% (37/42) in the induction group (p = 0.29). For curative dose treatment, the rate of neuraxial analgesia was 45,5% in the spontaneous group versus 78,6% (p = 0.12). The median time without anticoagulation was 34 h [26-46] in the spontaneous labor group and 43 h [34-54] in the induction group (p = 0.01), without an increased incidence of thrombosis. The rate of postpartum hemorrhage did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Planned induction tended to increase the rate of neuraxial analgesia, without reaching significance, and most women in spontaneous labor accessed analgesia. Peripartum management should be a shared decision with the patient considering the obstetrical and thrombosis risk context for each patient.

Evaluation of Complications in Postpartum Women Receiving Therapeutic Anticoagulation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate complications associated with early postpartum therapeutic anticoagulation.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective cohort study was done to evaluate the association between therapeutic anticoagulation postpartum and major complications (hemorrhagic and wound complications). Secondary outcomes included minor complications, risk factors associated with total complications (including the time to therapeutic anticoagulation resumption after delivery) and recurrent thrombotic events within 6 weeks postpartum.

RESULTS

From 2003 to 2015, 232 consecutive women were treated with therapeutic anticoagulation within 96 hours postpartum; among those treated, 91 received unfractionated heparin, 138 received low-molecular-weight heparin, and three received other anticoagulants. The primary outcome, a composite of major hemorrhagic complications (requiring transfusion, hospitalization, volume resuscitation, transfer to intensive care unit, or surgery) and major wound complications, occurred in 7 of 83 (8.4%) for cesarean deliveries and 9 of 149 (6.0%) for vaginal deliveries (P=.490). Total complications (including major and minor hemorrhagic and wound complications) occurred in 13 of 83 (15.7%) for cesarean deliveries compared with 9 of 149 (6.0%) for vaginal deliveries (P=.016). When comparing cases associated with and without complications, the median delay before resuming anticoagulation was significantly shorter for both cesarean (12 vs 33 hours, P=.033) and vaginal deliveries (6 vs 19 hours, P=.006). For vaginal deliveries, 8 of 51 (15.7%) women had complications when anticoagulation was started before 9.25 hours postpartum, compared with 1 of 98 (1.0%) when started after 9.25 hours. For cesarean deliveries, 7 of 21 (33.3%) of women experienced complications compared with 6 of 62 (9.7%) if anticoagulation was started before or after 15.1 hours, respectively. Two (0.9%) episodes of venous thromboembolism occurred within 6 weeks postpartum.

CONCLUSION

Among postpartum women who received early therapeutic anticoagulation, major complications occurred in 8.4% for cesarean deliveries and 6.0% for vaginal deliveries. Complications were associated with earlier resumption of therapeutic anticoagulation, particularly before 9.25 hours for vaginal deliveries and before 15.1 hours for cesarean deliveries.

Management of Venous Thromboembolism in Pregnancy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This manuscript addresses the risks for venous thromboembolism (VTE) during pregnancy and the associated challenges of both diagnosis and treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

The obstacles to diagnosis given lack of specificity of typical biomarkers to predict VTE in pregnancy, as well as the unique fetal and bleeding risks introduced by managing massive pulmonary embolism (PE) with thrombolytics or thrombectomy are highlighted. VTE during pregnancy and the postpartum window occurs at a 6-10-fold higher rate compared with age-matched peers and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Hypercoagulability persists for 6-8 weeks after delivery with the highest risk of PE being postpartum. The lack of randomized trials in pregnant women leads to variability in practice, which are largely based on expert consensus or extrapolation from non-pregnant cohorts. The standard treatment of VTE in pregnancy is anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), which like unfractionated heparin does not cross the placenta and is not teratogenic. LMWH is preferred given the negligible risk for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and osteoporosis, better bioavailability, and a predictive dose response. Depending on the severity of the VTE, additional treatments including thrombolysis, thrombectomy, inferior vena cava filter placement, or venous stenting may be used. Management requires balancing the competing bleeding and thrombotic risks during labor and delivery and factoring the impact of treatment on the fetus. A multidisciplinary team involving hematology, obstetrics, anesthesia, vascular medicine, and cardiology is critical for safe and timely management. The design and execution of prospective, randomized trials to specifically address optimal diagnosis and management are a top priority in obstetric hematology.

Low molecular weight heparin use during pregnancy and risk of postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide with a prevalence rate of approximately 6%. Although most cases of PPH have no identifiable risk factors, the incidence of PPH has been associated to the thromboprophylaxis in pregnancy with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Thus, the aim of the study is to evaluate the risk of PPH in cases of pregnant women exposed to LMWH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Electronic research was performed in OVID, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, MEDLINE, the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through April 2016. We included randomized controlled trials, cohort and case-control studies of women who underwent thromboprophylaxis with LMWH during pregnancy compared to a control group (either placebo or no treatment). The primary outcome was the incidence of PPH. The summary measures were reported as relative risk (RR) or as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Eight studies including 22,162 women were analyzed. Of the 22,162 women, 1320 (6%) were administered LMWH, 20,842 (94%) women formed the nonexposed group (control group). Women treated with LMWH had a higher risk of PPH (RR 1.45, 95%CI 1.02-2.05) compared to controls; there was no difference in mean of blood loss at delivery (MD -32.90, 95%CI 68.72-2.93) and in risk of blood transfusion at delivery (RR 1.24, 95%CI 0.62-2.51), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Women who receive LMWH during pregnancy have a significantly higher risk of developing PPH. Women who receive LMWH during pregnancy have neither significantly higher mean blood loss at delivery nor higher risk of blood transfusion.