Functional assessment and quality of life in patients following replantation of the distal half of the forearm (except fingers): A review of 11 cases

Patient-reported significant disability after major traumatic upper extremity amputation

The aims of this study were to record patient-reported outcomes of treatment of proximal upper extremity amputation injuries and subsequent return to work. A consecutive cohort of 38 patients with a traumatic amputation at or proximal to the carpus had been treated with a replantation or revision (completion) amputation in Tampere University Hospital between 2009 and 2019, and 31 of them participated in this study. The primary outcome was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure (DASH). Patients reported significant disability indicated by DASH score after replantation (median 30; interquartile range [IQR] 21-47) and revision (completion) amputation (median 33; IQR 16-52). Most patients had cold intolerance and reported low hand function and aesthetics scores. Out of 17 working patients, 10 did not return to their previous work. Our study demonstrates the influence of major upper extremity amputation on daily life activities, even after a successful replantation.Level of evidence: IV.

Indications for replantation and factors that predict success

Since the advent of replantation techniques, there has been uneven progress in terms of success-even considering whether success is defined as continued perfusion of the digit or long term functional outcomes. Early enthusiasm and success have not been maintained despite increasing familiarity with microsurgical techniques and greater understanding of how to optimize outcomes for the individual components of replantation such as tendon repair, nerve repair, and osteosynthesis. Practitioners participating in the care of patients undergoing replantation should be familiar with the history and current understanding of both the indications and contraindications for the procedure, post-operative rehabilitation, and factors contributing to functional outcomes. A review of the literature from the first publications on the topic demonstrates evolution in practice and understanding of which patients should be indicated for replantation. Indications can be considered in three broad categories: injury factors, patient factors, and care context factors. These factors intersect with one another and can inform the surgeon pre-operatively regarding the most likely outcome for a given patient. This insight is critical to discuss pre-operatively with the patient in order to make a shared decision about how to manage their injury.

A data set for the design and implementation of the upper limb disability registry

BACKGROUND

If the data elements needed for patient registries are not identified, designing and implementing them can be very challenging. Identifying and introducing a Data Set (DS) can help solve this challenge. The aim of this study was to identify and present a DS for the design and implementation of the upper limb disability registry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, to identify the administrative and clinical data elements required for registry, a comprehensive study was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Then, the necessary data elements were extracted from the studies and a questionnaire was designed based on them. In the second phase, in order to confirm the DS, the questionnaire was distributed to 20 orthopedic, physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians and physiotherapists during a two-round Delphi. In order to analyze the data, the frequency and mean score of each data element were calculated. Data elements that received an agreement more than 75% in the first or two-round Delphi were considered for the final DS.

RESULTS

A total of 81 data elements in five categories of "demographic data", "clinical presentation", "past medical history", "psychological issues", and "pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments" were extracted from the studies. Finally, 78 data elements were approved by experts as essential data elements for designing a patient registry for upper limb disabilities.

CONCLUSION

In this study, the data elements necessary for the design and implementation of the upper limb disability registry were suggested. This DS can help registry designers and health data administrators know what data needs to be included in the registry system in order to have a successful design and implementation. Moreover, this standardized DS can be effective for integrating and improving the information management of people with upper limb disabilities and used to accurately gather the upper limb disabilities data for research and policymaking purposes.

Long-term follow-up of three different nerve repair strategies (repair, autografting and allografting) in one-stage replantation to treat upper extremity amputation

OBJECTIVE

To examine the efficacy of three different nerve repair methods for one-stage replantation to treat complete upper extremity amputation and long-term postoperative functional recovery.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients underwent direct nerve anastomosis (Group A), for patients with nerve defects greater than 3 cm, nerve autograft transplantation be used (Group B), or patients with nerve defects less than 3 cm, nerve allograft transplantation be used (Group C) based on the severity of injury. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score (higher score means poorer function-less than 25 means good effect) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for pain at rest and under exertion were measured. Sensation recovery time and grip function were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 78 ± 29 months. Group A had the lowest DASH score, while Group C had the highest DASH score. DASH score differed significantly between the three groups (P < 0.001). Sensation was not restored in two patients in Group B and two patients in Group C, and there were significant between-group differences in sensation recovery (P = 0.001). Group C had the lowest VAS score, while Group A had the highest, and there were significant differences between groups (P = 0.044). Only one patient in Group C recovered grip function.

CONCLUSION

Direct nerve anastomosis should be performed whenever possible in replantation surgery for complete upper extremity amputation, as the nerve function recovery after direct nerve anastomosis is better than that after nerve autograft transplantation or nerve allograft transplantation. Two-stage nerve autograft transplantation can be performed in patients who do not achieve functional recovery long after nerve allograft transplantation.

Functional Outcomes of Major Upper Extremity Replantation: A Scoping Review

Traumatic upper limb amputations proximal to the carpus are devastating injuries. Existing literature on outcomes following replantation is limited. Our objective was to perform a scoping review of (1) functional outcomes; (2) return to work data; and (3) secondary surgeries required following proximal to carpus replantation.

Outcomes Following Replantation/Revascularization in the Hand

The variability in reported outcomes and outcome measures used in digit replantation makes it difficult to compare results among studies. This article reviews the principles of measuring functional and patient-reported outcomes after replantation, and describes the recommended instruments to use and ways to report results.

Hand, Wrist, Forearm, and Arm Replantation

Level of injury plays a significant role in decisions to perform replantation, with improved function, nerve regeneration, and decreased rate of reperfusion injury for injuries at the distal forearm or wrist compared with proximal injuries. The principles of a functional and sensate outcome dictate replantable parts, whereas patient comorbidity, expectations, and safety dictate patient candidacy. Vascular grafts are an expected part of the operation, and the contralateral arm or a lower extremity should be prepped into the surgical field. Despite diminished function, patient satisfaction and independence remain high after a major upper extremity replantation.